18-year-old making $1.1K monthly

[Breaking News Breaking News]

The above photo of a new gaming app in the iTunes App Store called “Fruit Station” gives us clues as to how some apps are earning money. Simply by looking at the screenshots of the game on iTunes, we can see the telltale hints of in-app purchase income via the “boost store,” which allows gamers to “remove ads” and “double all coin pick ups” for various amounts.


In-app purchases like these are what some developers call “clean” buys – money that the user (or their click-happy kids) intended to spend, proving they like the game at least enough to progress further. Devices like these are helping some app developers clean up in revenue, and are fascinating to witness when you can ferret out the actual income folks are making.

Here are a few app income reports from real people:
#1 – Reality check: $160.78 in one month from gaming apps

A good lesson to learn in the face of all the news about apps like “Make it Rain” making $50,000 per day is that there are still smaller developers like Walkabout Media, LLC making only $160.78 per month as of April 2014, even incorporating the method of re-skinning apps and utilizing in-app purchases.

Despite the “day of small beginnings,” it’s inspiring to see companies like this stick with it, because – who knows – the next app they release could be the one that blows that income amount out of the water.
#2 – Earning $800 in one week with new gaming app monetization methods

“Fun fact – last week the in-app purchases from 3 of my apps made me about $70. The new monetization I’m doing made me $800,” wrote Carter Thomas, waxing nostalgic about how strategies like in-app purchases within gaming apps were dying.

But that was 10 months ago, and reading through the responses on that post shows both how fast the RevMob mentality can shift, along with fascinating comments from the maker of “InstaFit,” who earns approximately $288 per day off the app.
#3 – Thomas Strock: 18-year-old making more than $1,100 per month from apps

I love reading Thomas’ income reports. The most recent one shows that he brought in iOS app income of $1,170 in February 2014. Not one to rest on his laurels, the teenager also brings in a boatload of money from publishing Kindle-edition books on Amazon.

“The vast majority of my money comes from paid apps at the moment,” Thomas wrote in the comments section of that same blog post. Another lesson gleaned from studying his apps is that while some of his previous creations were game-like (such as the now seemingly defunct from the Google Play Store “Madlibs Generator”), the .99 non-gaming ones must be ruling the income roost.

So there’s a good and realistic peek at some real-life income reports from app makers. They might not be the $90,000-per-day earning top iOS apps – at least not yet – but viewing actual moneymakers in the trenches of the gaming app fields helps give us hope and perspective of the industry.

http://venturebeat.com/2014/06/23/real-a...k-per-day/

[Breaking News Breaking News]

There are 1.2 million apps in Apple’s App Store. Most of them you’ve never heard of. Most of them will quietly fade away, lost in a competitive marketplace. For app developers, it’s a daunting task to create something that stands out and gets downloaded by thousands. This makes what’s happened with Yo in the last week so curious.


Yo is a messaging app in which users can hit a button and send each other a “yo,” which arrives on their smartphone as a push notification. The app took only eight hours to build. It was launched on April Fool’s Day. Yo’s logo is as vanilla as possible, simply a shade of purple. Its security was weak enough that a group of college kids hacked it. That led its co-founder to write a post, headline: “We were lucky enough to get hacked.”

Yo does not appear to have a lot going for it. Yet somehow it caught on. The app’s Twitter feed reported Sunday that it has over one million users. Any start-up employees that have toiled away for months on a little-known app can be excused for bashing their heads against a wall in frustration.

Yo appears likely to be a fad. As Robert Scoble put it, Yo is the pet rock of 2014. Sunday it began falling down the list of the most downloaded free apps. It still closed the day in a respectable spot, No. 9 overall.

Whether Yo lasts, its success is a reminder that the digital world remains a place for entertainment, conversation and single-servings. We’ve seen in the past the popularity of single-service Web sites such as barackobamaisyournewbicycle.com, doineedanumbrellatoday.com, sadtrombone.com and howmanypeopleareinspacerightnow.com.

When apps or Web sites are intensely narrow in their focus — and deliver a single serving — success comes easier. We know exactly what we’re going to a site for.

The app Make it Rain, in which users swipe their screens to accumulate dollars, succeeded for similar reasons to Yo. It reportedly was generating $50,000 a day earlier this year. It’s a simple, silly and dumb app.

There’s something humorous about an app that is incredibly focused on something very small. Anything that is funny is worth talking about and sharing, which helped Yo gain that viral traction.

The trend of digital single servings can be seen in Facebook’s strategy. Its recently been unbundling its services into a handful of narrowly focused apps, such as Messenger, Paper and Slingshot.

If there’s a lesson in Yo, it may be this. Apps that do something fun that no one else offers — no matter how dumb the concept – are likely to succeed. Keep it simple, and stupid can — for better or worse — be a winning strategy.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/inno...it-it-big/