Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation

[xanthas]

From The Sunday Times, May 24, 2009, John Harlow, Los Angeles

SOME of America’s leading billionaires have met secretly to [color="#0000ff"]consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population[/color] and speed up improvements in health and education. The [color="#0000ff"]philanthropists[/color] who attended a summit convened [color="#0000ff"]on the initiative of Bill Gates[/color], the Microsoft co-founder, discussed [color="#0000ff"]joining forces to overcome[/color] political and religious [color="#0000ff"]obstacles to change[/color].
[color="#0000ff"]
Described as the Good Club by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America’s wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey. [/color]

These members, along with Gates, have [color="#0000ff"]given away more than £45 billion[/color] since 1996 to causes ranging from health programmes in developing countries to ghetto schools nearer to home.

They gathered at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University, in Manhattan on May 5. [color="#0000ff"]The informal[/color] afternoon [color="#0000ff"]session was so discreet[/color] that some of the billionaires’ aides were told they were at “security briefings”.

[color="#0000ff"]Stacy Palmer, editor of the Chronicle of Philanthropy, said the summit was unprecedented[/color]. “We [color="#0000ff"]only learnt about it[/color] afterwards, [color="#0000ff"]by accident[/color]. Normally these people are happy to talk good causes, but this is different – maybe because [color="#0000ff"]they don’t want to be seen as a global cabal[/color],” he said.

Some details were emerging this weekend, however. The billionaires were each given 15 minutes to present their favourite cause. Over dinner they discussed how they might settle on an “umbrella cause” that could harness their interests.

The issues debated included reforming the supervision of overseas aid spending to setting up rural schools and water systems in developing countries. [color="#0000ff"]Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority.[/color]

This could result in a [color="#0000ff"]challenge to some Third World politicians[/color] who believe contraception and female education weaken traditional values.

[color="#0000ff"]Gates[/color], 53, who is giving away most of his fortune, [color="#0000ff"]argued that healthier families[/color], freed from malaria and extreme poverty, [color="#0000ff"]would change their habits and have fewer children within half a generation[/color].

At a conference in Long Beach, California, last February, he had made similar points. “Official projections say the world’s population will peak at 9.3 billion [up from 6.6 billion today] but with charitable initiatives, such as better reproductive healthcare, we think we can cap that at 8.3 billion,” Gates said then.

Patricia Stonesifer, former chief executive of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which gives more than £2 billion a year to good causes, attended the Rockefeller summit. She said the billionaires met to “discuss how to increase giving” and they intended to “continue the dialogue” over the next few months.

Another guest said there was “nothing as crude as a vote” but [color="#0000ff"]a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat[/color].

“This is something so nightmarish that [color="#0000ff"]everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers[/color],” said the guest. “[color="#0000ff"]They need to be independent of government agencies[/color], which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.”

[color="#0000ff"]Why all the secrecy? “They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government[/color],” he said.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/wo...350303.ece

[AndrewX]

Very interesting article xanthas.

SOME of America’s leading billionaires have met secretly to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population and speed up improvements in health and education. The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change. 

This article is yet another deceitfully blatant attempt at concealing and disguising the heinously criminal beliefs and activities of the Luciferian cult’s fear in losing, amongst all other things, their evil and criminally acquired stronghold on the world as well as ‘their lives and the lives of everyone directly related to them’, in the inevitable event of the masses eventually waking up to their TRUE intent of wanting to cull the world’s population, which they again falsely refer to as ‘reducing the population’,  to a proportion that no longer poses any threat to them in being able to control and easily quash them if need be;  as they know that they cannot do now given that they don’t have an army large enough for such purpose. 

It has been proven beyond any doubt that the world’s entire population can easily be fitted into an area no larger than the State of Texas which clearly shows that the earth is not even close to becoming truly overpopulated by any stretch of the imagination.  Yet these liars insist on bestowing this deceit on everyone in a manner that is not only fallaciously covert but also undermines the foundations of creation to a degree never before seen in our existing history.  This makes them criminals of the highest order who are in reality an enormously far cry from being any sort of philanthropists in any sense of the term; equally so is anyone who aids them in this deceit, including the ‘supposed’ journalist and directors of the organization that pays them to write such knavish articles against humanity. 

It is also obvious going by what is written in the last line of the first paragraph in this treasonous article that they are the ones who truly control not only a large portion of the world’s wealth, but who also control its political and religious establishments and are in fact openly implying that they are attempting to instill their own beliefs on the world ‘using and via’ these means; but they do so in latent manner.  This is yet another attempt of blinding the populous into falsely believing that these people are ‘somehow’ ABOVE and ‘better than’ the scope of politics, spirituality and creation; which is as inexplicable and pallid as their incomprehensible greed and thirst for absolute control and power over every individual on earth.

Described as the Good Club by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America’s wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.

As with the antagonistic principles and inimical nature of their spirituality, so too the ‘description’ of their ‘club’; truth being it is ‘the Evil Club’.

These members, along with Gates, have given away more than £45 billion since 1996 to causes ranging from health programs in developing countries to ghetto schools nearer to home.

Are we to believe that giving ‘away’ 45billion in a period of time that we’ve effectively stolen hundreds of TRILLIONS is a benevolent act?  That is the same as any individual taking the liberty of exercising a ‘tax write off’ under the guise of ‘giving away’ £45 after immorally and grotesquely acquiring anywhere from ‘½ a million to a few million’ Sterling Pounds.  Such a person would be given a lengthy jail term instead of a pat on the back and they be viewed by all as the criminals that they really are; as many already do view the members of this ‘coveted[/b] and ‘seemingly’ covert’ Club.

They gathered at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University, in Manhattan on May 5. The informal afternoon session was so discreet that some of the billionaires’ aides were told they were at “security briefings”.

 
The informality of the afternoon meeting ‘as such’ was ONLY to the public and not to them, and their aides are always told to treat any of their employers meetings as a security risk to their masters.  So the only real revelation in that statement, if you could call it that, was the mentioning of the meeting place; which no doubt is another lie.

[b]Stacy Palmer, editor of the Chronicle of Philanthropy, said the summit was unprecedented. “We only learnt about it afterwards, by accident. Normally these people are happy to talk good causes, but this is different – maybe because they don’t want to be seen as a global cabal,” he said.

[/b] 
Or maybe it's because they don’t want cameras or ‘‘true and unbiased reporters’ being present’ to expose what they are really talking about?  Stacy Palmer is either a fool or on their payroll.
 
Some details were emerging this weekend, however. The billionaires were each given 15 minutes to present their favourite cause. Over dinner they discussed how they might settle on an “umbrella cause” that could harness their interests. The issues debated included reforming the supervision of overseas aid spending to setting up rural schools and water systems in developing countries. Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority. 

The Rothschild’s and their pets the Rockefeller’s, never seek the opinions of others to decide what should be discussed in any matter, they simple discuss what they wanted to from the onset.  This has obviously been depicted as a meeting of ideas and thought exchanging, when in reality it was a directive briefing.  Very appropriate how they chose a foolish lamb like Bill Gates to use as the escape goat for initiating talks on culling most of the humans on earth.  It may disappoint the Rothschild’s and Rockefeller’s to hear that when the people finally do awaken to them that they will want all of them strung out to dry and not just Bill Gates.

This could result in a challenge to some Third World politicians who believe contraception and female education weaken traditional values.

It may but then again it may not.  One thing it definitely DOESN’T do, unlike the implication it makes, is that it doesn’t mean that only[/b] 3rd world politicians and people believe that contraception and female education weaken traditional values – as well as they themselves know well is the case.  Hence their current smears on people wanting many children and not using contraception; it supports their desire of population reduction.  Hence also them wanting to have women spend their time in an education system that teaches very little because if they didn’t do that then they’d be spending their time at home teaching their children the values of the family entity, which would maintain the children’s allegiance to it instead of the State; those wanting an education could easily seek it anyway, without the ‘Clubs’ persuasion or intervention.

[b]Gates, 53, who is giving away most of his fortune, argued that healthier families, freed from malaria and extreme poverty, would change their habits and have fewer children within half a generation.

[/b] 
If the rest of these scoundrels would also relinquish most of their fortune then no one in the world would suffer from malaria or extreme poverty; and there would never ever be another war.  Yet another deceitful line in this article, as they all are.

At a conference in Long Beach, California, last February, he had made similar points. “Official projections say the world’s population will peak at 9.3 billion [up from 6.6 billion today] but with charitable initiatives, such as better reproductive healthcare, we think we can cap that at 8.3 billion,” Gates said then.  Patricia Stonesifer, former chief executive of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which gives more than £2 billion a year to good causes, attended the Rockefeller summit. She said the billionaires met to “discuss how to increase giving” and they intended to “continue the dialogue” over the next few months.

 
The lies and deceit simply don’t stop, one piled on top of the other, a classical example of today’s ‘supposed’ journalism; propaganda personified.  They discussed ‘giving’?  Perhaps they’ve realized what a dangerous position they currently are all in because the masses have wised up as to how greedy and ‘taking’ they all are?  An attempt to save both face and arse done so eloquently as to not require them having to come out and openly force the people to think that they are not greedy and overly ‘taking’.

Another guest said there was “nothing as crude as a vote” but a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.  Ã¢â‚¬Å“This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers,” said the guest. “They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.”

What a bubbly way of saying that we are the real government; they’re a real piece this mob.

[b]Why all the secrecy? “They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government,” he said.

[/b]
First they tell us that they are above the government, and then they try to fool us into thinking that they aren’t.  Perhaps they somehow hope that by squeezing their heads into the bucket of sand as they have, and blabbing all this crap they did, that we’ll all go away and let them do as they please without hindrance once they pull it back out?  They are not only evil and stupid but selectively naive – only where it suits them of course. 

I have no doubt that articles like this will be read by countless future generations as a classical example of how ridiculous our society and those who govern it were once upon a time; a great example of mankind’s stupidity and ignorance that will be deemed as something to be kept well away from. 

The overall impression I get about this article is that it’s an indirect admission by them that the people have started to wake up in numbers that they did not anticipate.  Although this may seem at first to be some sort of victory to the Rothschild’s it is in fact an admission of defeat put forward in a pretentiously victorious manner.  Now where have I seen this before?  My memory somehow fails me at the moment; never mind. 

Isn’t it wonderfully humorous just how deceitful everyone is who is related in any way to the Rothschild’s?icon_lupe  Such deceit, such stupidity, ever so sick and delusional; they will even threaten to hurt innocent bystanders in an effort to get what they want and can’t have, in an effort to curtail those that they cannot defy fairly or otherwise.  They will not last, as Seneca once said, “Unjust domain cannot be eternal.”,  because they behave like spoilt brats, and they prove it unknowingly and openly in many different ways as they have also done with this article. 

Nice article xanthas.icon_wink

[xanthas]

Thanks Andrew.

Don't you just love philanthropists?icon_cuinlove

Bless their little white cotton socks & their putrid rotten hearts! icon_veg The world would indeed be a different place without all their 'goodwill'!icon_greatgrin

[xanthas]

Andrew,

Point is, they're already very successful at achieving their goals, the brown people heading the top of the list. AIDS being a case in point, which, as the aware insider knows, is a lab-created concoction initially 'designed' to target the very particular (read 'disturbing' & unfitting) gay group of people in the US & then kind of went "out of control" (how convenient!) & spread to Africa whereby now about [color="#0000ff"]35 mil[/color] (I think, not sure though...) people from women, babies, old & young [color="#0000ff"]people are affected[/color].

Of course, the pharmaceutical mafia (in line with their 'loyalty' towards their Masters) is withholding the cheap & available medication to help those affected.

Africa being the very 'root chakra' country that it is (survival, primal drives, old superstitions), still has this ingrained belief that if an infected man sleeps with a virgin they will miraculously be 'cured' & healed.

And so, little girls from anywhere between 3 to 10 years & upwards are raped because these men truly believe this nonsense. Another tactic, is to keep them ignorant about the true way of how AIDS is transmitted which 'conveniently' plays into the hands of those 'promoting' the curbing of OP.

AIDS has by now spread to Asia as well as Russia. So, they're full on target. It's of course interesting to note, that the 'initiator' of the is whole 'gratitious meeting' has no kids himself - ever so fitting, isn't it just?

In America, as well as globally, it is the artificially created finanical crisis that has now millions of people homeless, their pensions erased, their livelihood being anything but secure & the young not knowing what's up & coming.

This is a nice little 'preview' of Obama's "approach" to deal with America's OP 'problem' as he sees fit.

[color="#0000ff"][size="2"]Obama Has Revived Hitler's Genocide Program[/size] [size="-1"]by John Hoefle

[/size][/color]http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2009/36...itler.html

[color="#0000ff"]Excerpt:[/color]
[size="-1"]Hitler's murder spree started with the mentally ill, the terminally ill, invalids, and the disabled, and eventually spread to millions of Jews, Gypsies, and other "[color="#0000ff"]undesirables[/color]"—worked to death or exterminated in concentration camps.[/size]

[size="-1"][color="#0000ff"]This monstrous program was initially sold as an economic measure: "The economic burden represented by people suffering from hereditary diseases is a danger for the State and society[/color]," Nazi Dr. Gerhard Wagner said at the [color="#0000ff"]Nazi party congress in 1934. The Nazis required all state institutions to report on patients who were chronically ill, and used those reports as the basis to decide which patients should be killed[/color].[/size]

[size="-1"]Today [color="#0000ff"]the Obama Administration is[/color] beginning to descend down that same road, [color="#0000ff"]promising to make the "tough choices" to cut entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security to save money[/color]—at precisely the time in which an increasing number of Americans are forced to depend on them as the economy slides deeper into Depression. [color="#0000ff"]Obama is willing to spend trillions of dollars to bail out the financial markets, and pay for it by slashing programs which keep ordinary Americans alive[/color].[/size]

[size="-1"]Think we're exaggerating? Take the case of a paper entitled [color="#0000ff"]"What Are the Potential Cost Savings from Legalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide?" [/color]It sounds like something that might have been written by Jeremy Bentham, or Aldous Huxley, or maybe Nazi doctor Karl Brandt, but [color="#0000ff"]it was actually co-authored in 1998 by "bio-ethicist" Ezekiel Emanuel, brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel[/color], a leading advisor to Obama's budget director Peter Orszag, and a member of t[color="#0000ff"]he 15-person Federal Coordinating Council on Comparative Effectiveness Research, the group which has been designated to prepare the list of which medical procedures will henceforth be permitted, and which will not.[/color]

Emanuel's co-author, [color="#0000ff"]Margaret Battin, has written other papers promoting[/color] suicide and [color="#0000ff"]selective refusal of medical treatment. The pair are really just echoing Karl Brandt's defense of euthanasia at Nuremberg: "Death can mean deliverance. Death is life—just as much as birth.[/color][/size]

[color="#0000ff"][size="2"]Outlaw the HMOs[/size][/color] [size="-1"]One instrumentality of this Nazi policy is the health insurance sector, led by the pharmaceutical companies and the Health Maintenance Organization companies. HMOs, which were started during the Nixon Administration, [color="#0000ff"]are the health-care equivalent of an Enron, a vehicle inserting a financial middleman between doctor and patient, for the purposes of jacking up the costs while reducing the quality of health-care delivered[/color]. [color="#0000ff"]The main role of the HMO sector is to break the control of doctors over health care, and transfer control to corporate cartels[/color].[/size]
[size="-1"]HMOs make their profits by siphoning off some of the cash flow intended for treatment of patients, and thus [color="#0000ff"]reducing the amount of money available for health care[/color]. The more they cut the care, the more left for them. But the [color="#0000ff"]money is only part of it. The real goal of this health system is to increase the death rate by depriving citizens of proper health care measures. Ultimately, the HMOs are part of the Anglo-Dutch financial empire's genocide machine[/color].[/size]

Did I say South Africa? One of the worst affected by the AIDS virus? Oh, and of course, Apartheid was the precursor (Israeli supported & funded, no surprise there, really - them are busy eliminating the Palestine people) to this...never mind the ANC (what a joke!).

Don't you just love Obama's big grin?icon_megagrin

He's the [color="#0000ff"]perfect[/color] frontman for the job because he's coloured himself so nobody catches on to the trap. Can't beat it, can ya?

Make no mistake, them goodwill 'Lords' (lording it on us by left, right & centre) are rubbing their greedy hands while conning the public with media disinfo.