ChatGPT AI Explains Organ Harvesting And The Pandemic

[Hissil]

ChatGPT AI Explains Organ Harvesting And The Pandemic
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Me9hRzsLF1US/

00:00 Intro
01:04 How To Sell Your Body For $46 Million
04:23 Presumed Consent Opt-Out Organ Donation Laws
07:04 Euthanize And Harvest Laws
09:44 Young Blood
17:44 Fetal Tissue Retention Scandals
26:55 Planned Parenthood
29:12 COVID WHO Guidelines; Organs Are Suitable For Transplants
34:14 How COVID Patients Were Over-Treated to Death
40:03 Harvesting Stem Cells From Dead Bodies

#aiexplains how the #pandemic #organharvesting and #abortion are intrinsically connected to recent advances in #biotechnology

Hello and welcome ladies and gentlemen. On today's feature-length documentary, we investigate
an alternative narrative that encompasses and connects organ donation, abortion, the
pandemic, and biotechnology. Perhaps there is a common denominator.
How much is the human body worth? Are we all organ donors by default? Is it okay to euthanize
patients with the intention of harvesting their organs? Is fetal tissue valuable to
the anti-aging industry? Has anyone ever been caught red-handed illegally handling vast
amounts of aborted fetal tissue? Why did the World Health Organization not allow autopsies
on people who died with COVID? Have hospitals over-treated COVID patients to death? Finally,
what is the game-changing advance in biotechnology that has made dead bodies a valuable commodity?
In 2003, Wired magazine published an article titled "How to Sell Your Body" for $46 million.
The writer Patrick D. Justo had done extensive research to conclude how much money can be
made by donating every reusable body part. Of course, there's a catch. The most lucrative
substances are the ones you can't go without. The sources of the article include the National
Center for Research Resources, Oxford Biomedical Research, Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Southeast
Missouri Hospital, United States Biological and other organizations.
Let's explore this article and any implications with what's been going on in the world in
the last couple of years.
Used to be the human body was worth pocket change. 97 cents would buy all the raw carbon,
iron, and calcium a person had to offer. Nowadays, thanks to improved processing, a determined
seller could reap closer to $46 million for donating every reusable part. Of course, there's
a catch. The most lucrative substances are the ones you can't go without.
So the $7 million you'd get for your germ-fighting antibodies would be quickly spent on the plastic
bubble needed to keep you alive. If you want to capitalize on your biology, your best bets
are fluids and soft tissues. A fertile woman between the ages of 18 and 25 can donate one
egg every three months and rake in $7,000 each time. Over eight years, that's 32 eggs
for a total of $224,000. A virile man would have to sell a lot of sperm at $75 a pop to
match that. Male testosterone, the very essence of gynus, yields less than a penny per body.
Get in bone marrow, which goes for $23 a milligram, and things start to add up.
[MUSIC]
[MUSIC]
[MUSIC]
[MUSIC]
Every day across the UK, someone dies waiting for an organ transplant. So, the law around
organ donation in England has changed to allow more people to save more lives. You still
have a choice if you want to be an organ donor or not when you die. You can choose to opt
in or opt out by recording your decision on the NHS Organ Donor Register. Now the law
has changed. It will be considered that you agree to be an organ donor when you die. Now
the law has changed. It will be considered that you agree to be an organ donor when you
die. On May 2020, two months after the first coronavirus lockdown, the United Kingdom has
joined the long list of countries that have an opt-out organ donation system. This new
law made everyone organ and tissue donors, unless individuals specifically register to
withdraw from the program.
[MUSIC]
Because in Spain, more people donate organs after they die than anywhere else in the world.
That's because by law, everyone there is automatically an organ donor, unless they actively opt out.
[MUSIC]
As of 2021, most European countries have adopted the presumed consent, opt-out model for organ
donation. A similar picture emerges worldwide.
[MUSIC]
Dr. Steve Bede runs the Nova Scotia Organ and Tissue Donation Program and is a proponent
of a new law that presumes you are an organ donor upon death, helping families with that
difficult conversation at their worst hour.
We are presuming that if individuals had not registered to opt out or told their families
or loved ones that they did not want to opt out, then we will proceed with donation if
medically appropriate.
But the law still respects those who decide not to donate.
We specifically built an opt-out registry for those individuals who choose that. So
my hope is that...
Are there any other laws or initiatives around the world toward making it easier for patients'
organs to be harvested?
Wesley Smith from the National Review reports.
We have entered the era of what I call "do harm medicine," in which the concept of what
constitutes harming the patient has become entirely malleable and subjective. I even
wrote a book covering that subject.
Here's an example. When organ transplant medicine began, the dead donor rule was instituted
to assure a wary public that people's vital organs would only be procured after the person
was dead. This assures the public that people will not be killed for their body parts.
The dead donor rule has been under attack for some time within the utilitarian bioethics
movement. Many bioethicists are now pushing to allow doctors to kill via organ harvest,
sometimes called organ donation euthanasia or O.D.E.
At first, this proposed killing license was supposed to be limited to patients on the
verge of death or the permanently unconscious. Now, a prominent bioethics journal has published
a piece urging that healthy people be allowed to die by removal of vital organs.
The author claims that because people can instruct life-sustaining treatment to be withdrawn
and can donate their organs after death, that organ donation euthanasia is also okay, because
it will result in death too, and result in more usable organs procured and more lives
saved.
But that's not true. Not everyone dies after having life-sustaining treatment withdrawn.
Once death ceases to be the necessary predicate for donating vital organs and is replaced
with consent, there would be no natural limiting principle. And so it is here. Rather than
being a form of euthanasia to end suffering, the idea is to permit someone to have themselves
killed for the altruistic purpose of saving other people's lives, called living vital
organ donation. All that matters would be consent, and moreover, such a program would
allow for tailored killing by harvesting.
Hospitals across Australia are reportedly being paid to harvest the organs of dead patients
under a $17 million program. According to the Sunday Herald Sun, the scheme has been
set up under the Organ and Tissue Authority, where hospitals could receive more than $11,000
for each patient who becomes a donor. The program is designed to help hospitals cover
the cost of organ transplants. But there's concern from doctors it could be seen as an
incentive for hospitals to pressure patients into giving away their organs. It's believed
the funding has been endorsed by health ministers.
The British Telegraph published an article on May of 2022 titled "Youth Transplants Really
Can Slow the Aging Process." Stanford scientists find infusions of cerebrospinal fluid can
regenerate the brain's memory center and may help to rejuvenate elderly bodies. The Telegraph's
science editor Sarah Napton describes how harvesting the blood and body parts of the
young in the hope of achieving immortality has long been a familiar trope in horror novels
and conspiracy theories. Young people have more powerful cells which operate more efficiently
and could restore vitality to aging systems.
This week Stanford University showed that infusing cerebrospinal fluid of young mice
with old mice improves brain function, a breakthrough which could have enormous implications
for dementia and other neurodegenerative conditions.
Closer examination showed the fluid had woken up processes which regenerate neurons and
myelin, the fatty material that protects nerve cells within the hippocampus, the memory center
of the brain.
Dr. Tony Wisecore of Stanford's School of Medicine in California said the research showed
that the aging process is malleable and that improving the environment in which neurons
live may be a better approach than targeting the cells themselves.
And it's not just in the brain where the regenerating properties of youth are showing promise.
The effect appears to work from head to tail.
Earlier this month, the Quadram Institute in Norwich showed that transplanting fecal
microbes from young mice into old mice reversed hallmarks of aging in the gut, eyes, and brain.
Controversial new treatment that may hold promise but at a price.
It does appear to reverse the aging process.
Dr. Jesse Karmazin is talking about transfusions with the young blood from teenagers and he
says it just may turn back the hands of time.
That blood is going to patients over 35 as part of a clinical trial called Ambrosia where
subjects paid $8,000 to get the rich growth factors found in the platelets in blood's
plasma.
The brains are younger, hearts, their hair, if it was gray, it just turns dark again.
There has also been encouraging Alzheimer's research using young blood at Stanford.
We found that it was safe and feasible to administer infusions of young plasma weekly.
Dr. Sharon Shaw is a researcher who says they have seen evidence of improved brain health
and evidence of improvement in functional ability.
It's all very exciting that there can be components in blood that could be healing.
Platelet-rich plasma or PRP treatments using a patient's own blood have been in demand
as trendy vampire facials to fight wrinkles and as joint and tissue treatments to accelerate
healing.
A lot of goodies in blood.
A lot of goodies in blood.
If we go back to 2016, the British NHS had already broken ground on getting every bit
of benefit from young blood.
The Mail Online reports, NHS to harvest baby's organs, ghoulish proposal gives mothers pregnant
with a damaged fetus and agonizing choice, abort the dying child or give birth so body
parts can be used for transplants.
Mothers of children with fatal defects will have the option to give birth.
Once the infant has been declared stillborn, doctors will remove its organs.
They will then be used to save the lives of other children who are currently being placed
on 7000 strong waiting list.
The practice could raise ethical questions while alleviating organ shortage.
Dr. Trevor Stammers, director for bioethics, St. Mary's University has made an argument
against the proposed practice.
It would be frankly abhorrent if transplant doctors were to ask women whose unborn children
have been diagnosed with severe defects to let their baby go to term for the sole reason
that its body can be rated for its organs.
Mothers electing to carry babies with such severe defects to term have, up till now,
often been pressured to abort anyway.
They have been regarded as foolish to continue the pregnancy.
It is concerning that mothers will now be encouraged to go to term with the express
intention of the child's organs being taken.
What happens if they change their mind once they see their newborn son or daughter?
The integrity of transplant medicine has already been compromised by using organs from
euthanized adults.
Rating the bodies of children born only for their organs will further tarnish the profession
and could well lead to a broader decrease in the rates of organ donation.
Fast forward to March of 2022, new laws were voted in multiple states of the USA,
including Maryland and California, that changed the legislation around perinatal death.
The Miami Standard reports, "Proposed law in Maryland would allow mothers to kill their
babies up to 28 days after birth.
Senator William Smith has proposed new legislation in Maryland that would legalize abortion
up to 28 days after a child is born."
Senate Bill 669, also called the Pregnant Persons Freedom Act of 2022,
provisions that a newborn baby can be left to die for up to a month after being born
in the event that the mother decides she no longer wants to keep it.
A hearing for the WOKE Bill has been scheduled for March 15, when legislators will debate it.
The bill also proposes a revision of the fetal murder-manslaughter statute that would serve
to block the investigation of infant deaths unrelated to abortion,
Attorney Olivia Summers pointed out.
Soon thereafter, California followed suit and voted California Assembly Bill 2223.
The perinatal death language included in the original bill could lead to an unintended
and undesirable conclusion.
The bill could be interpreted to immunize a pregnant person from all criminal penalties
for all pregnancy outcomes, including the death of a newborn for any reason during the
perinatal period after birth, including a cause of death which is not attributable
to pregnancy complications.
In other words, it could effectively legalize infanticide up to 28 days after the baby is born,
the perinatal period, for any reason.
I contacted my colleague, a well-known person in the criminal underworld,
and simply told him I had a child for sale.
I wanted to sell that child for spare parts, to brothel, to pedophiles.
I didn't give a fu*k where it would go. I just wanted to sell it and make money.
Disposed of? They're usually disposed of because they're no longer eligible for transplants.
Due to drug-related body exhaustion?
Yes.
When the child is no longer attractive, when it's useless and can't be used for spare parts any longer,
they make movies and post them on the darknet. Treated it in such a way
that even I got to detest the kid as a result.
But they gladly accepted it.
She thought the kid was adopted, but in fact, it went for spare parts.
Okay, so what are the options from there? Brothel or spare parts?
It depends. If there's demand, they will even pull a child out of the brothel.
From the brothel for spare parts?
Yes.
So the parts are a priority?
Yes, absolutely. They bring in huge money quickly.
It's living by working in a brothel.
And when there's a bid for an organ, it goes on an operating table for disassembly.
The mother also goes for spare parts.
[Music]
Let's have a look at three cases over the years when aborted fetuses were retained illegally,
presumably to benefit financially by selling the fetal tissue to the pharmaceutical industry or other potential buyers.
The Los Angeles fetus disposal scandal was the 1982 discovery of over 16,000 aborted fetuses at Malvin Weisberg's California home.
Malvin Weisberg had operated medical analytic laboratories in Santa Monica from 1976 until March 1981.
He purchased a 20-foot storage container in 1980, delivering it to his Woodland Hills home and paying for it with a bounced check for $1,700.
The container was repossessed on February 3, 1982, by the Martin Container Company, based in the Wilmington area of Los Angeles.
The company opened the container on the following day, discovering the fetuses, which were stored in formaldehyde.
The fetuses resulted from pregnancies terminated by physicians, clinics and hospitals
who contracted with medical analytic laboratories for pathology testing and disposal of the fetuses.
In August 1985, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors ordered the fetuses be turned over to the Garra-Gutierrez-Alexander Mortuary for burial.
The Feminist Women's Health Center petitioned the Los Angeles Superior Court to block the burial, but the courts refused.
Weisberg's medical analytical laboratories received nearly $175,000 in Medi-Cal payments, with $88,000 coming from pathology tests on aborted fetuses.
America today is involved in another desperate conflict.
Much of the action takes place behind the scenes, set in clinics, homes and hospitals.
We made a decision to repossess it because its check did not clear the bank, so we sent the truck out to pick up the container.
I rode out there and took the box up and started pulling it up, and it was so heavy it just broke the winch.
And we couldn't get it off the trailer, so we had to leave it on the trailer because it was too heavy.
So I was asked by Nick to have a crew go down and unload the container at the other yard.
I got a radio call from Ron Gillette, foreman, and he said the men were throwing up and there was something really wrong.
One of them fell down and hit me right in front of my feet, and it was opened up, and there it was.
It was a mutilated body, and the more closer I looked at it, it was a human body.
When I came to work in fall that day, I saw it myself, and I couldn't believe it.
Little babies, you know, just all torn to pieces, heads chopped off, arms, legs, you know, just...
Well, as the supervisor for the county of Los Angeles, we found out through the media that 17,000 infants had been stored in a container.
17,000 infants had been stored in a container.
The Alder Hay Organs Scandal involved the unauthorized removal, retention, and disposal of human tissue, including children's organs, during the period 1988 to 1996.
During this period organs were retained in more than 2,000 pots containing body parts from around 850 infants.
These were later uncovered at Alder Hay Children's Hospital, Liverpool, during a public inquiry into the organ retention scandal.
Until a public inquiry in 1999, the general public was unaware that Alder Hay and other hospitals within the National Health Service (NHS) were retaining patients' organs without family consent.
The inquiry was sparked by the death of 11-month-old Samantha Ricard, who died in 1992 while undergoing open-heart surgery at Bristol Royal Infirmary.
In 1996, four years after Samantha's death, her mother Helen Ricard learned of the allegations of excessive mortality rates for children's heart surgery at this hospital.
Ricard demanded a copy of her daughter's medical records and found a letter from the pathologist, stating that he had retained Samantha's heart.
Confronted with this evidence, the hospital promptly returned the heart.
Ricard quit her job in order to find out exactly what had happened to her daughter.
She set up a support group with other parents and ran a free phone helpline to cater to the many other families affected as well.
A Bristol Heart Children Action Group was set up, and the group embarked on discussions with the hospital to find out how much human material had been kept from children who had died after cardiac surgery.
In February 1999, the Action Group members called a press conference.
As the details of Alder Hay's organ retention began to come to light, the public learned that the program went back decades.
An investigation was opened, bringing to light the fact that Alder Hay was not the only Liverpool hospital affected; Walton Hospital had stored the organs of 700 patients.
In January 2001, the official Alder Hay report was published.
The report revealed that over 100,000 organs, body parts, and entire bodies of fetuses and stillborn babies were stored in 210 NHS facilities.
Additionally, 480,600 samples of tissue taken from dead patients were also being held.
Furthermore, it emerged that Birmingham Children's Hospital and Alder Hay Children's Hospital in Liverpool had also given thymus glands, removed from live children during heart surgery, to a pharmaceutical company for research in return for financial donations.
Alder Hay also stored, without consent, 1,500 fetuses that were miscarried, stillborn, or aborted.
Starting on August 5, 2004, the bodies of 50 nameless babies stored for medical research at Liverpool hospitals were buried at Allerton Cemetery.
More funerals followed on the Thursday of each week for several months to come.
Over 1,000 unidentified bodies, most of them fetuses less than 28 weeks old, were buried during this time.
On March 25, 2022, pro-life activists Teresa Bukovinak and Lauren Handy went to Washington's Surgy Clinic, an abortion facility owned and operated by Cesare Santangelo, to engage in anti-abortion advocacy.
A truck from Curtis Bay Medical Waste Services was parked outside.
They noticed two large boxes marked with biohazard symbols next to the truck and asked the driver if he was aware of what was in the boxes.
He told them he didn't know, so they informed him there were likely aborted children inside.
After he confirmed the boxes were from Washington's Surgy Clinic, I asked him, "Would you get in trouble if we took one of these boxes?"
According to the two activists, the driver then gave them permission to take one, so they brought the box to Handy's apartment.
Inside was a red plastic bag in which they discovered the remains of 110 aborted babies, mostly of first trimester age.
[Music]
[Music]
Does it ever like move or anything when it comes out?
That's why I try it and sever the umbilical cord first.
And we wait for that to stop pulsing and that's why the fetus is expired first, so it doesn't.
Usually at this point, in the year before, it's too early to survive usually.
It will expire shortly after birth.
Technically, legally, we would be obligated to help it to survive, but it probably wouldn't.
It's all in how vigorously you do things to help a fetus survive at this point.
There's things you do. Obviously, you're here for a certain procedure.
And if your pregnancy were, let's say you went into labor, the membrane's ruptured,
and you delivered before we got to the termination part of the procedure here,
then we would do things we would not help it.
[Music]
[Music]
Now a story we guarantee most of you have never heard before.
Big money is being made from the sale of fetal body parts.
Even the most ardent pro-choice advocates, like Planned Parenthood president Gloria Felt, are disturbed by what we found.
It seems inappropriate, totally inappropriate.
[Music]
A lot of people want intact parts these days.
They're looking for specific nodes, AV nodes, SNA.
I was like, "Wow, I didn't even know. Good for them."
Yesterday was the first time she said people wanted lungs.
And then she felt like I said, "Always as many intact livers as possible."
Yeah, livers.
People want lower extremities too. That's sensible. I mean, that's easy.
I don't know what they do with it, but I guess they want muscle.
[Music]
[Music]
I'd say a lot of people want liver.
And for that reason, most providers put this piece under ultrasound guidance
so they'll know where they're putting their forceps.
Then a re-limiting step of the procedure is calvarium.
Calvarium, the head, is basically the biggest part.
Most of the other stuff can come out intact.
It's very rare to have enough guidance to evacuate all the other stuff.
To bring the body cavity out intact and all that.
So then you just kind of have this in where you put your brass spurs.
Try to intentionally put it below the thorax so that, you know,
we've been very good at getting parts on the liver.
Because we know that--so I'm not going to crush that part.
I'm going to basically crush below, I'm going to crush above,
and I'm going to see if I can get it all intact.
[Music]
Health Ministry has issued guidelines for the disposal of bodies.
For bodies of dead COVID-19 patients, the WHO is mandating BSL-3.
WHO and AIIMS advise cremation.
The lungs of a dead COVID-19 patient, if not handled correctly during an autopsy,
can be infectious.
To prevent contact of doctors and mortuary workers with the deceased's body fluids,
an autopsy must be avoided.
An autopsy must be avoided.
In the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, around March and April of 2020,
the World Health Organization issued guidelines about, quote,
"infection prevention and control for the safe management of a dead body in the context of COVID-19."
We have therefore made the assessment that COVID-19 can be characterized as a pandemic.
This guidance stated that because it's not yet known how contagious the virus is,
autopsies can only be performed under special conditions and require, quote,
"adequately ventilated room, at least natural ventilation with at least 160 liters per second
for patient airflow, or negative pressure rooms with at least 12 air changes per hour
and controlled direction of airflow when using mechanical ventilation."
Hospitals around the world interpreted this guidance as prohibitory for autopsies
as such facilities are simply not available in most countries,
only in a few large hospitals in Western countries.
As a result, the process of declaring a COVID-19 death,
handling of the corpse and cremating or burying was greatly expedited,
leaving very little time or making it impossible for loved ones
to come into physical contact with the body of the deceased
from the time of death to the time of cremation or burial.
Articles were published on mainstream media,
normalizing the idea that dead bodies could indeed transmit the virus,
therefore special protocols are needed for handling the deceased.
Fast forward to 2022 and now mainstream media are openly reporting
that the actual death toll of COVID might have been exaggerated
because of policy dictating how the death certificates were filled in.
Back to March of 2020, on the back of the World Health Organization's guidance,
countries issued mandates on whether autopsies are even allowed
and how long a dead body can remain before it is cremated or buried.
India ruled out autopsies unless for "special reasons"
and mandated that negative pressure be maintained in the mortuary.
India and the Philippines mandated that dead bodies from COVID-19
must either either cremated within a few hours from the time of death
or buried in a sealed metal casket within the same time period.
India and Philippines are both countries with widespread organ trafficking.
These scenes from India, with mass cremations and frantic disposal of dead bodies,
are a direct result of these policies.
Fast forward to today, it's widely accepted that people dying from other causes
were falsely labeled as COVID deaths,
thus falling under the special burial protocol where an autopsy was not allowed.
Today, we also know that PCR tests, considered the golder standard
through the early months of the pandemic, are actually wildly inaccurate.
The American Center for Disease Control has admitted to distributing flawed tests
that gave a large number of false positives.
Fast forward to February of 2022,
mainstream media are now reporting that people who die from COVID-19
are viable organ donors, after all.
And even that organs from deceased COVID-positive donors
could lead to an increase in organ transplants and save lives.
There seems to be a discrepancy here.
To sum up, in the early months of the pandemic, in April and March of 2020,
thousands of excess deaths were reported as COVID deaths through inaccurate PCR tests,
and their dead bodies were handled in secrecy and hastily cremated or buried,
because of a special handling and burial protocol dictated by the World Health Organization.
But we've since found out that these people might have died from other causes
and that their organs are actually viable for donation.
Is there any other indication that COVID patients are treated like valuable commodities,
rather than getting the best available treatment?
Dr. Joseph Merkula reports.
Something truly unthinkable is happening in America's hospitals.
Around the country, COVID-19 patients are being killed by inappropriate medical protocols,
and they have no say so in the treatment they receive.
They've literally been stripped of their patient rights.
They're refused basic drugs like antibiotics and steroids.
They're even denied basic nutrition and fluids,
which amounts to a war crime under Rules 531 and 1182 of the Geneva Convention,
which state you may not starve a person and you must provide basic necessities even to prisoners.
Instead, COVID patients are over-treated with dangerous and ineffective therapies like remdesivir,
narcotics and mechanical ventilation, a combination that more often than not results in death.
Many doctors who understand the importance of early and appropriate treatment are perplexed
and horrified by what they're seeing, and for good reason.
It's truly beyond comprehension at this point.
Perhaps the most shocking example I've come across is the case of a perfectly healthy man involved in a car accident.
In a talk with Stu Peters on Rumble,
Benjamin Gord claims to have been given an unknown knockout drug by the attending EMT
and woke up on life support in a COVID ward.
He pulled out the vent all by himself, as he was unharmed from the accident.
When he demanded to know why he'd been placed on mechanical ventilation,
the shock staff told him he was being treated for COVID.
In other cases, patients have been put on COVID standard care even though they came in for something else.
Patients are also being denied release and are basically held as prisoners in the hospital.
Many are refused the right to deny treatment.
On the other hand, they're forced to accept "do not resuscitate" orders that they don't want.
There are also reports of COVID patients being given potent central nervous system respiratory depressants
otherwise known as "euthanasia cocktails", combinations of sedatives like morphine, fentanyl, and midazolam.
The medical kidnapping and mistreatment of patients against their will has become so widespread,
human rights attorney Thomas Renz asked the Truth for Health Foundation
to set up a medical advisory team called the COVID Care Strategy Team
to help families physically liberate their loved ones from hospitals where they're kept captive.
While one can speculate about the ethics of hospital administrators and doctors all day long,
one of the most obvious answers to how this could have happened is that hospitals are receiving massive incentives
to over-treat COVID patients to death.
In the simplest terms, every patient has what amounts to a $100,000 bounty on their head.
Hospitals receive bonus payments for
COVID testing and COVID diagnoses.
Hospitals receive a 20% bonus on top of the standard cost for the treatment of a COVID patient.
Admission of a COVID patient
Use of Remdesivir
The US government actually pays hospitals an additional bonus when they use Remdesivir,
and that's in addition to the 20% upcharge.
Remdesivir was developed as an antiviral drug and tested during the Ebola breakout in 2014.
Results were beyond disappointing.
In the early months of 2020, the drug was entered into COVID trials.
Those trials were also beyond disappointing.
Not only was the drug ineffective against the infection,
but it also had significant and life-threatening side effects,
including kidney failure and liver damage.
Despite its clear dangers and lack of effectiveness,
the US Food and Drug Administration authorized Remdesivir for emergency use against COVID in May 2020
and then gave it full approval in October 2020.
Use of mechanical ventilation, which CMS whistleblowers claim kill 84.9% of COVID patients within as few as 96 hours.
COVID deaths
In August 2020, former director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Robert Redfield,
agreed hospitals had a financial incentive to overcount COVID deaths.
According to RENS, hospitals are raking in a minimum of $100,000 extra for each and every COVID patient
when they follow the directive to only treat with Remdesivir and ventilation.
On the other hand, hospitals that refuse to follow this deadly protocol
and use things like ivermectin, antibiotics and steroids, forfeit all government payments.
Other countries are reporting similar trends.
The Canadian press reports that COVID-19 patients are often given excessive doses of medications
such as opioids, benzodiazepines and anticholinergics that could result in a lethal overdose.
In the UK, senior care homes have been accused of killing off COVID patients with midazolam, a powerful sedative.
In April 2020, 38,352 out-of-hospital prescriptions for midazolam were issued,
while the monthly average for the five years before was only 15,000.
Midazolam depresses respiration and it hastens death.
"It changes end-of-life care into euthanasia," retired neurologist Dr. Patrick Pulacino told Mail Online.
And speaking of euthanasia, at the end of 2021,
the government of New Zealand okayed voluntary euthanasia by lethal injection for COVID patients
if the doctor believes the COVID patient won't recover.
The doctor performing the euthanasia gets paid $1,087 by the government for this service.
Everywhere you look, the focus seems to be on maximizing the death toll, not saving lives.
Have any recent advances in biotechnology or medical science made dead bodies a valuable commodity?
Stem cell research is one of the most fascinating areas of contemporary biology.
Donating her own stem cells to treat... stem cell technology... to assess the safety of the stem cell treatment...
...donating blood stem cells... first FDA approved stem cell trial... they replaced it with stem cells...
We're back now with the controversy over stem cell clinic.
Stem cells are the body's raw materials, special human cells that are able to develop into many different cell types
under the right conditions in the body or a laboratory.
This can range from muscle cells to brain cells.
In some cases, they can also fix damaged tissues.
This is called regenerative medicine.
Regenerative medicine is based on the generation and use of therapeutic stem cells,
tissue engineering, and the production of artificial organs.
There are several sources of stem cells.
Embryonic stem cells come from discarded embryos that are 3 to 5 days old and originate from in vitro fertilization clinics.
These are the most valuable and versatile type of stem cell because they can become any type of cell in the body.
Perinatal stem cells are collected from umbilical cord of a baby immediately after birth.
Researchers have discovered stem cells in amniotic fluid as well as umbilical cord blood.
These stem cells also have the ability to change into specialized cells.
Adult stem cells
These stem cells are found in small numbers in most adult tissues, such as bone marrow.
Adult stem cells have recently become more important in stem cell research
as scientists were able to alter genes and reprogram these to act similarly to embryonic stem cells.
Nowadays, bioengineering companies have been developing a new source of stem cells.
Osseum has created a new paradigm for cell therapy development
by bringing the deceased donor transplant ecosystem into the fight against diseases of the blood and immune systems.
Our therapeutics platform is built on our bone marrow bank,
a first-of-its-kind solution for processing, banking, and deploying bone marrow-derived cell therapies at industrial scale.
The United States Department of Health and Human Services has awarded multiple grants to Osseum,
including a $1.6 million grant for optimizing industrial-scale GMP processes
for recovering and banking deceased donor bone marrow.
The procurement, processing, and banking bone marrow from cadaveric vertebral bodies in Ilea,
which were shown to produce high yields of viable hematopoietic stem cells and other bone marrow cells from donors
after varying lengths of warm and cold ischemic times.
Another grant for $1.4 million is for
novel strategies for storage and recovery of cadaveric bone marrow stem cells.
Osseum Health has developed a robust system for obtaining living bone marrow cells
from the 60,000 donors each year who gift organs and tissues following their death.
Osseum is proposing to develop innovative methods that will reduce the costs of deceased donor bone marrow cell isolation,
resulting in one-third the cost and one-fifth the time to process each specimen.
These cells will be banked and made available to physicians and biomedical researchers.
In their own words, they are extracting whole bone marrow from dead organ donor vertebral bodies,
cryopreserving it, banking it and selling it to health care providers.
Bone marrow is a tissue that can be cryopreserved indefinitely.
We can freeze bone marrow for decades, thaw it later and transplant it effectively.
And yet there was still this massive shortage.
And one of the reasons for that was that we weren't recovering bone marrow from deceased donors,
largely because there was nowhere to put it and, you know, there wasn't good infrastructure for it.
You know, the basic idea is recover bone marrow from deceased organ donors.
Recover bone marrow from deceased organ donors.
Deceased organ donors means virtually everyone, because of presumed consent, opt-out organ donation laws.
Freeze it, you know, do some testing and evaluation on it, make sure it's good, it's healthy, it's sterile.
Get the HLA type of a donor and then use it for transplant later.
One of the advantages of recovering bone marrow from deceased donors is they don't need it anymore.
And so we can recover far more, a much higher volume of cells from them than you would ever ethically take from a living donor.
And so in the bone marrow itself, we get about five-fold the cell volume you would get from a typical living donor aspiration.
And then also we don't just get the bone marrow, we actually get the bone itself from the organ procurement organizations.
And then mesenchymal stem cells, for example, they're naturally, they're adherent to the bone.
And we can enzymatically digest those off of it and get massive populations of MSCs.
[BEEPING]
[BEEPING]
[SPEAKING FOREIGN LANGUAGE]
[BEEPING]
[SPEAKING FOREIGN LANGUAGE]
[BEEPING]
[MUSIC PLAYING]
[MUSIC PLAYING]
[MUSIC PLAYING]
[MUSIC PLAYING]
[MUSIC PLAYING]
[MUSIC PLAYING]
[MUSIC PLAYING]
[MUSIC PLAYING]