Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Demons and HELL
#11
Understood, so along the lines of true extra-terrestrial life, do you believe any exists within or past our galaxy? Or are they mere illusions with the sole purpose of confusing humans into believing them to be the alien forms of our indoctrinated media?
Reply

#12
Understood, so along the lines of true extra-terrestrial life, do you believe any exists within or past our galaxy? Or are they mere illusions with the sole purpose of confusing humans into believing them to be the alien forms of our indoctrinated media?
Reply

#13
If there are extra-terresterial life outside our galaxy, I would think they would look human based on my studies in evolution and chemistry.

The same chemical composition that involves carbon is the only stable way of organic beings having organs, protective skin, etc. Life also needed plants and oceans on earth for the same chemical reasons that allowed our animals to strive. Oceans bring carbon to land, plants metabolizes carbon material, and animals eat carbon material (food) from plants (just like how we depend on agriculture, or the meat of animals that ate plants), so that it can be digested into their carbon-like bodies. We eat food so it can be digested into our carbon-like body. Sugar is a form of carbon, and it can be broken down to provide ATP to all our cells, etc. So if somehow far in the galaxy, simple cells involved into animals, we would have a similiar animal kingdom.

How would humans evolve and not reptoids evolve, etc? First of all, for the same reasons that allowed plants to thrive, trees would grow in this other planet. Trees have fruits that animals eat, and then when the animal spits out the seed, another tree grows perhaps in a more favorable area (the same way, flowers would also grow in this other planet because pollinators will carry the pollens of the flowers to other flowers). That's because only monkeys could evolved into humans because of drastic global changes that separates trees apart. Then primates would need a thumb for more grasping ability as they travel, more intelligence, and walking ability to forage for the fruits they need. They need all this to travel longer distances between trees. Only primates have this unique experience that allows them to involve into higher beings. Lizards for example, don't hunt for fruits from trees, and they don't need to travel long distances to reach trees because that does not consist their diet. Drastic global change that pulls the trees further away from each other was the key.

This is of course if you believe in the evolutionary theory. The creationist theory is possible and I can equally argue for both. But if I were to argue for creationsim,
most of my references will be out of the Bible.
Reply

#14
If there are extra-terresterial life outside our galaxy, I would think they would look human based on my studies in evolution and chemistry.

The same chemical composition that involves carbon is the only stable way of organic beings having organs, protective skin, etc. Life also needed plants and oceans on earth for the same chemical reasons that allowed our animals to strive. Oceans bring carbon to land, plants metabolizes carbon material, and animals eat carbon material (food) from plants (just like how we depend on agriculture, or the meat of animals that ate plants), so that it can be digested into their carbon-like bodies. We eat food so it can be digested into our carbon-like body. Sugar is a form of carbon, and it can be broken down to provide ATP to all our cells, etc. So if somehow far in the galaxy, simple cells involved into animals, we would have a similiar animal kingdom.

How would humans evolve and not reptoids evolve, etc? First of all, for the same reasons that allowed plants to thrive, trees would grow in this other planet. Trees have fruits that animals eat, and then when the animal spits out the seed, another tree grows perhaps in a more favorable area (the same way, flowers would also grow in this other planet because pollinators will carry the pollens of the flowers to other flowers). That's because only monkeys could evolved into humans because of drastic global changes that separates trees apart. Then primates would need a thumb for more grasping ability as they travel, more intelligence, and walking ability to forage for the fruits they need. They need all this to travel longer distances between trees. Only primates have this unique experience that allows them to involve into higher beings. Lizards for example, don't hunt for fruits from trees, and they don't need to travel long distances to reach trees because that does not consist their diet. Drastic global change that pulls the trees further away from each other was the key.

This is of course if you believe in the evolutionary theory. The creationist theory is possible and I can equally argue for both. But if I were to argue for creationsim,
most of my references will be out of the Bible.
Reply

#15
Very Interesting, does the theory of ancient astronauts hold any truth in your thoughts.  If the evolution of our ape-like ancestors was the direct link to us, what happened in the evolutionary process of the remaining monkeys.  Is the possibility of ancient humanoid beings participating in the speedy evolution of "humans" through genetic manipulation a plausible idea?
Reply

#16
Very Interesting, does the theory of ancient astronauts hold any truth in your thoughts.  If the evolution of our ape-like ancestors was the direct link to us, what happened in the evolutionary process of the remaining monkeys.  Is the possibility of ancient humanoid beings participating in the speedy evolution of "humans" through genetic manipulation a plausible idea?
Reply

#17
RoqEL22 Wrote:Very Interesting, does the theory of ancient astronauts hold any truth in your thoughts.  If the evolution of our ape-like ancestors was the direct link to us, what happened in the evolutionary process of the remaining monkeys.  Is the possibility of ancient humanoid beings participating in the speedy evolution of "humans" through genetic manipulation a plausible idea?
IMO, it is completely plausible. Our scientists have mapped out the human genome, can have genetic tests, can clone animals like sheeps, and finally, can inject DNA into embryos. All this can be confirmed in mainstream media. We just haven't inject DNA into human embryos for ethical reasons, and companies afraid of damaging their public image wouldn't fund these clinics to do it.

Advance humans could advance their genome knowledge and techniques to inject DNA into human embryos. They could even make DNA strands. I imagine in the future making DNA strands artificially is not hard (if you look up the chemical structure of DNA, it's basically a chain of the same group of chemical compounds that tend to stick together in a spiral fashion. So if you have ATG, or TGA as part of your genetic strand, A is one chemical compound, T is another, and G is another. There are only a few possible letter combinations that make up our entire DNA). And since these advance humans would be similar to our monkeys and even us genetically, then they could easily inject DNA into the embryos of our ancestors to accelerate the evolution from looking at their own genomes.

I believe if they had intervened in our evolution, they simply accelerated it. Scientists are dead set on the theory of evolution even with the missing link because the natural evolution of our ancestors would eventually adapt human traits. They were already adapting human traits before the missing link.

If they had intervened in our evolution and accelerated it, then that is one possibility why we have a missing link. The other possibility is that the missing link is obscured by mother nature.
Reply

#18
RoqEL22 Wrote:Very Interesting, does the theory of ancient astronauts hold any truth in your thoughts.  If the evolution of our ape-like ancestors was the direct link to us, what happened in the evolutionary process of the remaining monkeys.  Is the possibility of ancient humanoid beings participating in the speedy evolution of "humans" through genetic manipulation a plausible idea?
IMO, it is completely plausible. Our scientists have mapped out the human genome, can have genetic tests, can clone animals like sheeps, and finally, can inject DNA into embryos. All this can be confirmed in mainstream media. We just haven't inject DNA into human embryos for ethical reasons, and companies afraid of damaging their public image wouldn't fund these clinics to do it.

Advance humans could advance their genome knowledge and techniques to inject DNA into human embryos. They could even make DNA strands. I imagine in the future making DNA strands artificially is not hard (if you look up the chemical structure of DNA, it's basically a chain of the same group of chemical compounds that tend to stick together in a spiral fashion. So if you have ATG, or TGA as part of your genetic strand, A is one chemical compound, T is another, and G is another. There are only a few possible letter combinations that make up our entire DNA). And since these advance humans would be similar to our monkeys and even us genetically, then they could easily inject DNA into the embryos of our ancestors to accelerate the evolution from looking at their own genomes.

I believe if they had intervened in our evolution, they simply accelerated it. Scientists are dead set on the theory of evolution even with the missing link because the natural evolution of our ancestors would eventually adapt human traits. They were already adapting human traits before the missing link.

If they had intervened in our evolution and accelerated it, then that is one possibility why we have a missing link. The other possibility is that the missing link is obscured by mother nature.
Reply

#19
So how can we explain the origin or purpose of these demonic entities we talked about earlier.  What is their purpose, or more importantly what do they want from us?  If demons are separate from the "extra-terrestrials" previously mentioned, what is going on in the present.  Is it a battle for souls, an experiment, what are your thoughts regarding this?
Reply

#20
So how can we explain the origin or purpose of these demonic entities we talked about earlier.  What is their purpose, or more importantly what do they want from us?  If demons are separate from the "extra-terrestrials" previously mentioned, what is going on in the present.  Is it a battle for souls, an experiment, what are your thoughts regarding this?
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.