Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dystopian Movies Fit for a Dystopian World
The Future Is Here: Dystopian Movies Fit for a Dystopian World

by John W. Whitehead | The Rutherford Institute

    The Internet is watching us now. If they want to. They can see what sites you visit. In the future, television will be watching us, and customizing itself to what it knows about us. The thrilling thing is, that will make us feel we’re part of the medium. The scary thing is, we’ll lose our right to privacy. An ad will appear in the air around us, talking directly to us.”—Director Steven Spielberg, Minority Report

We have arrived, way ahead of schedule, into the dystopian future dreamed up by such science fiction writers as George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, Margaret Atwood and Philip K. Dick.

Much like Orwell’s Big Brother in 1984, the government and its corporate spies now watch our every move.

Much like Huxley’s A Brave New World, we are churning out a society of watchers who “have their liberties taken away from them, but … rather enjoy it, because they [are] distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing.”

Much like Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale, the populace is now taught to “know their place and their duties, to understand that they have no real rights but will be protected up to a point if they conform, and to think so poorly of themselves that they will accept their assigned fate and not rebel or run away.”

And in keeping with Philip K. Dick’s darkly prophetic vision of a dystopian police state—which became the basis for Steven Spielberg’s futuristic thriller Minority Report which was released 20 years ago—we are now trapped into a world in which the government is all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful, and if you dare to step out of line, dark-clad police SWAT teams and pre-crime units will crack a few skulls to bring the populace under control.

Minority Report is set in the year 2054, but it could just as well have taken place in 2022.

Seemingly taking its cue from science fiction, technology has moved so fast in the short time since Minority Report premiered in 2002 that what once seemed futuristic no longer occupies the realm of science fiction.

Incredibly, as the various nascent technologies employed and shared by the government and corporations alike—facial recognition, iris scanners, massive databases, behavior prediction software, and so on—are incorporated into a complex, interwoven cyber network aimed at tracking our movements, predicting our thoughts and controlling our behavior, Spielberg’s unnerving vision of the future is fast becoming our reality.

Both worlds—our present-day reality and Spielberg’s celluloid vision of the future—are characterized by widespread surveillance, behavior prediction technologies, data mining, fusion centers, driverless cars, voice-controlled homes, facial recognition systems, cybugs and drones, and predictive policing (pre-crime) aimed at capturing would-be criminals before they can do any damage.

Surveillance cameras are everywhere. Government agents listen in on our telephone calls and read our emails. Political correctness—a philosophy that discourages diversity—has become a guiding principle of modern society.

The courts have shredded the Fourth Amendment’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. In fact, SWAT teams battering down doors without search warrants and FBI agents acting as a secret police that investigate dissenting citizens are common occurrences in contemporary America.

We are increasingly ruled by multi-corporations wedded to the police state. Much of the population is either hooked on illegal drugs or ones prescribed by doctors. And bodily privacy and integrity has been utterly eviscerated by a prevailing view that Americans have no rights over what happens to their bodies during an encounter with government officials, who are allowed to search, seize, strip, scan, spy on, probe, pat down, taser, and arrest any individual at any time and for the slightest provocation.

All of this has come about with little more than a whimper from an oblivious American populace largely comprised of nonreaders and television and internet zombies, but we have been warned about such an ominous future in novels and movies for years.

The following 15 films may be the best representation of what we now face as a society.

Fahrenheit 451 (1966). Adapted from Ray Bradbury’s novel and directed by Francois Truffaut, this film depicts a futuristic society in which books are banned, and firemen ironically are called on to burn contraband books—451 Fahrenheit being the temperature at which books burn. Montag is a fireman who develops a conscience and begins to question his book burning. This film is an adept metaphor for our obsessively politically correct society where virtually everyone now pre-censors speech. Here, a brainwashed people addicted to television and drugs do little to resist governmental oppressors.

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). The plot of Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece, as based on an Arthur C. Clarke short story, revolves around a space voyage to Jupiter. The astronauts soon learn, however, that the fully automated ship is orchestrated by a computer system—known as HAL 9000—which has become an autonomous thinking being that will even murder to retain control. The idea is that at some point in human evolution, technology in the form of artificial intelligence will become autonomous and human beings will become mere appendages of technology. In fact, at present, we are seeing this development with massive databases generated and controlled by the government that are administered by such secretive agencies as the National Security Agency and sweep all websites and other information devices collecting information on average citizens. We are being watched from cradle to grave.

Planet of the Apes (1968). Based on Pierre Boulle’s novel, astronauts crash on a planet where apes are the masters and humans are treated as brutes and slaves. While fleeing from gorillas on horseback, astronaut Taylor is shot in the throat, captured and housed in a cage. From there, Taylor begins a journey wherein the truth revealed is that the planet was once controlled by technologically advanced humans who destroyed civilization. Taylor’s trek to the ominous Forbidden Zone reveals the startling fact that he was on planet earth all along. Descending into a fit of rage at what he sees in the final scene, Taylor screams: “We finally really did it. You maniacs! You blew it up! Damn you.” The lesson is obvious, but will we listen? The script, although rewritten, was initially drafted by Rod Serling and retains Serling’s Twilight Zone-ish ending.

THX 1138 (1970). George Lucas’ directorial debut, this is a somber view of a dehumanized society totally controlled by a police state. The people are force-fed drugs to keep them passive, and they no longer have names but only letter/number combinations such as THX 1138. Any citizen who steps out of line is quickly brought into compliance by robotic police equipped with “pain prods”—electro-shock batons. Sound like tasers?

A Clockwork Orange (1971). Director Stanley Kubrick presents a future ruled by sadistic punk gangs and a chaotic government that cracks down on its citizens sporadically. Alex is a violent punk who finds himself in the grinding, crushing wheels of injustice. This film may accurately portray the future of western society that grinds to a halt as oil supplies diminish, environmental crises increase, chaos rules, and the only thing left is brute force.

Soylent Green (1973). Set in a futuristic overpopulated New York City, the people depend on synthetic foods manufactured by the Soylent Corporation. A policeman investigating a murder discovers the grisly truth about what soylent green is really made of. The theme is chaos where the world is ruled by ruthless corporations whose only goal is greed and profit. Sound familiar?

Blade Runner (1982). In a 21st century Los Angeles, a world-weary cop tracks down a handful of renegade “replicants” (synthetically produced human slaves). Life is now dominated by mega-corporations, and people sleepwalk along rain-drenched streets. This is a world where human life is cheap, and where anyone can be exterminated at will by the police (or blade runners). Based upon a Philip K. Dick novel, this exquisite Ridley Scott film questions what it means to be human in an inhuman world.

Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984). The best adaptation of Orwell’s dark tale, this film visualizes the total loss of freedom in a world dominated by technology and its misuse, and the crushing inhumanity of an omniscient state. The government controls the masses by controlling their thoughts, altering history and changing the meaning of words. Winston Smith is a doubter who turns to self-expression through his diary and then begins questioning the ways and methods of Big Brother before being re-educated in a most brutal fashion.

Brazil (1985). Sharing a similar vision of the near future as 1984 and Franz Kafka’s novel The Trial, this is arguably director Terry Gilliam’s best work, one replete with a merging of the fantastic and stark reality. Here, a mother-dominated, hapless clerk takes refuge in flights of fantasy to escape the ordinary drabness of life. Caught within the chaotic tentacles of a police state, the longing for more innocent, free times lies behind the vicious surface of this film.

They Live (1988). John Carpenter’s bizarre sci-fi social satire action film assumes the future has already arrived. John Nada is a homeless person who stumbles across a resistance movement and finds a pair of sunglasses that enables him to see the real world around him. What he discovers is a world controlled by ominous beings who bombard the citizens with subliminal messages such as “obey” and “conform.” Carpenter manages to make an effective political point about the underclass—that is, everyone except those in power. The point: we, the prisoners of our devices, are too busy sucking up the entertainment trivia beamed into our brains and attacking each other up to start an effective resistance movement.

The Matrix (1999). The story centers on a computer programmer Thomas A. Anderson, secretly a hacker known by the alias “Neo,” who begins a relentless quest to learn the meaning of “The Matrix”—cryptic references that appear on his computer. Neo’s search leads him to Morpheus who reveals the truth that the present reality is not what it seems and that Anderson is actually living in the future—2199. Humanity is at war against technology which has taken the form of intelligent beings, and Neo is actually living in The Matrix, an illusionary world that appears to be set in the present in order to keep the humans docile and under control. Neo soon joins Morpheus and his cohorts in a rebellion against the machines that use SWAT team tactics to keep things under control.

Minority Report (2002). Based on a short story by Philip K. Dick and directed by Steven Spielberg, the film offers a special effect-laden, techno-vision of a futuristic world in which the government is all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful. And if you dare to step out of line, dark-clad police SWAT teams will bring you under control. The setting is 2054 where PreCrime, a specialized police unit, apprehends criminals before they can commit the crime. Captain Anderton is the chief of the Washington, DC, PreCrime force which uses future visions generated by “pre-cogs” (mutated humans with precognitive abilities) to stop murders. Soon Anderton becomes the focus of an investigation when the precogs predict he will commit a murder. But the system can be manipulated. This film raises the issue of the danger of technology operating autonomously—which will happen eventually if it has not already occurred. To a hammer, all the world looks like a nail. In the same way, to a police state computer, we all look like suspects. In fact, before long, we all may be mere extensions or appendages of the police state—all suspects in a world commandeered by machines.

V for Vendetta (2006). This film depicts a society ruled by a corrupt and totalitarian government where everything is run by an abusive secret police. A vigilante named V dons a mask and leads a rebellion against the state. The subtext here is that authoritarian regimes through repression create their own enemies—that is, terrorists—forcing government agents and terrorists into a recurring cycle of violence. And who is caught in the middle? The citizens, of course. This film has a cult following among various underground political groups such as Anonymous, whose members wear the same Guy Fawkes mask as that worn by V.

Children of Men (2006). This film portrays a futuristic world without hope since humankind has lost its ability to procreate. Civilization has descended into chaos and is held together by a military state and a government that attempts to keep its totalitarian stronghold on the population. Most governments have collapsed, leaving Great Britain as one of the few remaining intact societies. As a result, millions of refugees seek asylum only to be rounded up and detained by the police. Suicide is a viable option as a suicide kit called Quietus is promoted on billboards and on television and newspapers. But hope for a new day comes when a woman becomes inexplicably pregnant.

Land of the Blind (2006). In this dark political satire, tyrannical rulers are overthrown by new leaders who prove to be just as evil as their predecessors. Maximilian II is a demented fascist ruler of a troubled land named Everycountry who has two main interests: tormenting his underlings and running his country’s movie industry. Citizens who are perceived as questioning the state are sent to “re-education camps” where the state’s concept of reality is drummed into their heads. Joe, a prison guard, is emotionally moved by the prisoner and renowned author Thorne and eventually joins a coup to remove the sadistic Maximilian, replacing him with Thorne. But soon Joe finds himself the target of the new government.

All of these films—and the writers who inspired them—understood what many Americans, caught up in their partisan, flag-waving, zombified states, are still struggling to come to terms with: that there is no such thing as a government organized for the good of the people. Even the best intentions among those in government inevitably give way to the desire to maintain power and control at all costs.

Eventually, as I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, even the sleepwalking masses (who remain convinced that all of the bad things happening in the police state—the police shootings, the police beatings, the raids, the roadside strip searches—are happening to other people) will have to wake up.

Sooner or later, the things happening to other people will start happening to us.

When that painful reality sinks in, it will hit with the force of a SWAT team crashing through your door, a taser being aimed at your stomach, and a gun pointed at your head. And there will be no channel to change, no reality to alter, and no manufactured farce to hide behind.

As George Orwell warned, “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.”

Original Article:

Battlefield America: The War on the American People
Police forces across the United States have been transformed into extensions of the military. Our towns and cities have become battlefields, and we the American people are now the enemy combatants to be spied on, tracked, frisked, and searched. For those who resist, the consequences can be a one-way trip to jail, or even death. Battlefield America: The War on the American People is constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead’s terrifying portrait of a nation at war with itself. In exchange for safe schools and lower crime rates, we have opened the doors to militarized police, zero tolerance policies in schools, and SWAT team raids. The insidious shift was so subtle that most of us had no idea it was happening. This follow-up to Whitehead’s award-winning A Government of Wolves, is a brutal critique of an America on the verge of destroying the very freedoms that define it. Hands up!—the police state has arrived.

Foreword by Dr. Ron Paul PART I  A DECLARATION OF WAR
1 It Can Happen Here
2 Welcome to the Police State
3 A State of Martial Law
4 The Dismal State of Our Freedoms
5 Waking Up to Reality
6 Fascism American Style
7 We Hired Hitler!
8 The Building Blocks Are in Place
9 The Very Definition of Tyranny
10 Robbed Blind by the Government
11 Ravaged, Raped, and Stripped of Our Dignity
12 Lessons in Indoctrination and Compliance
13 Snitches for the Police State
14 The Double Standard in Defense
15 Who’s to Blame for Battlefield America?
16 A Country at War with Itself
17 Vigilantes with a Badge
18 When Police Shoot First and Ask Questions Later
19 In the War Zone
20 America’s Standing Armies
21 The Complicity of the Courts
22 The Mastermind Behind It All
23 The Banality of Evil
24 The Watchers
25 The Abyss of No Return
26 Orwell’s Nightmare: Big Brother Meets Big Business
27 The Twilight Zone Awaits Us
28 The FBI: America’s Thought Police
29 The Brave New World
30 The Matrix
31 Welcome to the Posthuman Era
32 Are You a Slave or Rebel?
33 Militant Nonviolent Resistance
34 Prisons Without Walls

By Dr. Ron Paul
ost  Americans  react  with  confusion,  disbelief,  and
even  hostility  when  told  that  America  is  not  a  free
country. This reaction is quite understandable. After all, we
are continually bombarded with messages from politicians,
the media, and even popular culture about how we are the
“freest nation on Earth.” We are even told that the reason
people from other countries hate us is because they resent
our freedom, not our drones.
But if one puts aside the propaganda and honestly looks
at modern American life, the idea that we are no longer a
free country does not seem so outrageous.
If Americans were truly free, then ...
Would  the  NSA  be  able  to  “monitor”  our  emails  and
other online activity without obtaining a warrant?
Would we have to submit to the TSA’s harassment every
time we boarded an airplane?
Would  local  governments  use  red-light  cameras  to
enrich themselves and deny us due process of law?
Would  we  hear,  on  an  almost  daily  basis,  stories  of
SWAT  teams  terrorizing,  and  even  murdering,  innocent
Americans via no-knock raids?
Would we watch in horror as police respond to peaceful
protesters with military force?
Would  armed  federal  agents  invade  Amish  farms
because  those  farmers  dared  sell  raw  milk  to  willing
Of course, we are told these infringements on liberty are
all for our own good. How else is the government supposed
to protect us from terrorists or stop us from using dangerous
drugs  or  drinking  raw  milk  unless  they  have  the
unrestrained power to spy, harass, and even shoot us with
weapons developed for use in war?
Fortunately, a growing number of Americans, including a
large number of young Americans, are questioning whether
we  are  really  better  off  trading  away  our  liberties  for
phantom  security.  These  people  are  studying  great
libertarian  thinkers  like  Mises,  Hayek,  and  Rothbard.  They
are also organizing with other activists to spread the ideas
of liberty.
Many other Americans who have not yet accepted the
entire libertarian paradigm have been motivated by some
outrageous  examples  of  government  abuses  to  speak  out
against  the  loss  of  our  freedom.  For  example,  Edward
Snowden’s revelations of the extent to which the National
Security  Agency  was  spying  on  Americans  caused  the
debate on the NSA to shift in a more pro-liberty direction,
while  the  events  in  Ferguson,  Missouri,  moved  police
militarization from an issue of concern for a few libertarians
to the center of American political debate.
During my 2012 presidential campaign, I often said that
we do not need a majority to win the battle for liberty, what
we need is an “irate, tireless minority.” The growing liberty
movement is certainly irate and tireless. However, to make
truly  revolutionary  change,  members  of  the  liberty
movement  must  also  have  a  solid  understanding  of  the
freedom philosophy as well as the communication skills to
rebut the arguments thrown at us by the statists of the left
and  right.  Liberty  activists  must  also  have  the  moral
courage  to  stand  by  their  beliefs  when  the  establishment
offers them the carrots of prestige and power or the sticks
of marginalization, ridicule, smears, and even IRS audits in
order to get them to “play ball” with the establishment.
Individuals who wish to move America in a pro-liberty
direction must not only understand how far we have drifted
from a free society, but grasp the true nature of the current
system.  Sadly,  even  many  libertarians  and  others  who
acknowledge how far we have drifted from a free society fail
to understand the nature of the current regime.
Some  engage  in  the  delusion  that  all  it  will  take  to
restore our liberty is replacing a “liberal” Democrat with a
“conservative”  Republican  or  vice  versa.  This  delusion  is
encouraged by the mainstream media, which exaggerates
relatively minor squabbles between the parties into major
ideological  clashes.  The  rarely  spoken  truth  is  that  the
establishment  of  both  parties  support  the  welfare-warfare
police state; they just disagree on how best to manage the
federal leviathan.
Those  who  still  believe  there  is  a  serious  difference
between the two parties should ask themselves why there is
such  a  remarkable  similarity  between  the  foreign,  civil
liberties,  and  even  economic  policies  of  the  Bush  and
Obama administrations.
Many  libertarians  and  conservatives  recognize  that
simply  replacing  a  big  government  Democrat  with  a  big
government  Republican  will  not  solve  what  plagues  our
country. Even so, they too still misdiagnose the problem as
being “socialism.” Given the large role government plays in
modern  economic  and  personal  life,  this  may  seem  an
accurate label. However, technically it is quite inaccurate,
as  socialism  describes  a  society  in  which  government
directly  owns  the  major  sectors  of  the  economy.  Since
government  does  not  own  the  “means  of  production,”
America cannot accurately be described as socialist.
In fact, the description that best fits modern America is
fascist. While this description might strike some people as
extreme or even kooky, anyone who considers the historical
definition of a fascist regime sees that fascist may be the
most accurate label to define the current American system.
Under  a  fascist  system,  property  is  nominally  held  in
private  hands  and  the  economy  is  officially  “free.”  All
appearances  to  the  contrary,  however,  the  economy  in  a
fascist system is carefully controlled by government through
a  labyrinth  of  taxes  and  regulations.  This  government
control is usually exercised for the benefit of an economic
elite  that  works  to  perpetuate  the  power  of  the  existing
political class.
Other  characteristics  of  fascist  systems  include  a
militaristic foreign policy and a police state that abuses our
civil  liberties.  Only  the  willfully  ignorant  could  deny  that
America’s foreign policy is militaristic, and we have already
seen the myriad ways in which modern government abuses
our civil liberties.
A fascist system also singles out critics of the regime for
harassment.  From  stopping  scholars  who  are  critical  of
America from entering the country to harassing journalists
whose works displease the current administration to siccing
the  IRS  on  organizations  critical  of  the  current
administration’s  policies,  government  harassment  of  their
political critics has become increasing common.
Just like acknowledging the nature of the problem is the
first  step  in  an  individual’s  recovery  from  alcoholism,
acknowledging  the  fascist  nature  of  modern  America  is  a
necessary step toward restoring American liberty.
This is why John W. Whitehead’s Battlefield America: The
War on the American People is so valuable. Eschewing over-
the-top hysteria in favor of pressing facts and analyses, Mr.
Whitehead  demonstrates  the  fascistic  character  of  the
current  American  government.  One  thing  that  makes  Mr.
Whitehead’s work particularly valuable is the way he draws
comparisons  not  just  from  history,  but  from  dystopian
fiction, to illustrate how America has lost its way. References
to popular works of fiction such as 1984, Brave New World,
and  even  the  classic  Twilight  Zone  episode,  “An  Obsolete
Man,” provide a familiar point of reference for many readers
and help open their minds to Mr. Whitehead’s arguments.
One  thing  that  I  am  particularly  happy  about  is  Mr.
Whitehead’s  recommendation  that  those  opposed  to  the
current  regime  engage  in  some  form  of  nonviolent
resistance.  I  also  endorse  his  recommendation  that
individuals  seek  out  alternative  sources  of  news  and
information  and  avoid  what  are  all  too  often  government
programs that emanate from the mainstream media.
Battlefield America: The War on the American People is
valuable  because  it  does  not  turn  away  from  naming  the
true nature of the American regime. I hope this book finds a
wide  audience.  However,  I  would  caution  readers  of  this
book  to  avoid  the  understandable  temptation  to  become
hopeless  upon  learning  the  magnitude  of  the  challenges
faced by the liberty movement.
The very fact that books like this can still be written and
published  shows  that  we  have  not  lost  all  our  freedoms.
Thanks  to  the  Internet,  it  is  easier  than  ever  before  to
spread the message of liberty and plan ways to challenge
state power. John Whitehead’s work should motivate us all
to redouble our efforts to reclaim our freedoms.
Dr. Ron Paul
January, 2015

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  UNJABBED: A fictional, dystopian future imagined by artist Ken Avidor Hissil 0 238 06-07-2022, 07:41 AM
Last Post: Hissil

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.
This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.