Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Globalist Mind War | 4th Generation Devastation | Great Taking | The Era of the West
#1
Globalists Fear the Unconquerable
J.B. Shurk
December 14, 2023

There are two great battles dominating Western nations today.  The first is political and involves a contest between freedom-minded citizens and an ever-expanding State.  The second is cultural (or perhaps, more accurately, spiritual) and involves a contest between fear-driven dogma and inspiration-driven ideals.  Globalization, or the secular religion dedicated to the concentration of power into the hands of an elite few, runs on the energy of fear.  Liberty movements that abhor the current trend toward a new-world-order framework intent on micromanaging human activity run instead on human ideals.  Of the two battles now raging, the cultural battle is more significant because its capacity for influencing hearts and minds will drive the future political outcome.  In a real sense, we are in a war between what to fear and what to cherish.

There are those who see the rapid advancements of the national security surveillance state, the unveiling of artificial intelligence systems capable of monitoring behavior and censoring speech, and the emergence of central bank digital currencies as determinative proof that a centralized, technocratic “ruling class” will soon be capable of enforcing total social control.  The power of fear-inducing intimidation rests with its appearance of inevitability, if not invincibility. 

Yet personal experience teaches people that fear is no match for inspiration.  The soldier on the battlefield fighting for freedom will charge forward when the conscripted soldier hesitates.  The dissident caught behind another Iron Curtain will risk life and limb when the Iron Curtain’s servants risk neither.  Steadfast service to God will give a man an unearthly armor when belief in nothing gives man nothing.  Citizens threatened into compliance are no match for citizens inspired to reach for higher ideals.  The former will minimize the costs that must be endured, while the latter will come to find no cost too great for success.  Futures founded on fear crumble when tested; societies formed through mutual support of human ideals stubbornly endure.

Before Franklin D. Roosevelt memorialized the phrase at his presidential inauguration, it was the great sixteenth-century French writer, Michel de Montaigne, who expressed the sentiment that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself.  By the time FDR implored Americans to find courage in the face of hardship, the idea that fear should be confronted and vanquished was a common refrain for many great wordsmiths who inspired entire generations.

Victorian-era poet William Ernest Henley urged his countrymen not only to persevere in the face of danger (“In the fell clutch of circumstance / I have not winced nor cried aloud. / Under the bludgeonings of chance / My head is bloody, but unbowed.”), but also to become unconquerable: “It matters not how strait the gate, / How charged with punishments the scroll, / I am the master of my fate, / I am the captain of my soul.”  Rudyard Kipling, one of the most famous writers at the turn of the twentieth century, placed fearlessness at the top of his poetic compilation of heroic virtues: “If you can keep your head when all about you / Are losing theirs and blaming it on you...”  Henley and Kipling echoed Montaigne’s critical observation that nothing shall ever be lost so long as one remains defiant and refuses to capitulate.

In contrast, today’s “ruling class” insists that there is no shortage of things to fear or people to blame, and it seeks humanity’s total capitulation.  “Defiance” has become “politically incorrect.” 

For fifty years, politicians and oligarchs in search of an excuse to seize greater control over economic activity have urged humanity to fear the weather.  If the recent government-induced hyperventilation over COVID is a harbinger of things to come, politicians and oligarchs will continue to urge humanity to fear pathogenic illnesses.  What if the spirit of Montaigne, Henley, or Kipling instead gripped today’s generations as they did in the past?  Children would not be indoctrinated to fear a “climate apocalypse”; they would be assured that humanity is never more ingenious than when it is tested.  Grown adults would not be infantilized to hide under their beds at the sound of a sneeze; they would be encouraged to “keep calm and carry on” for the sake of their families and communities.  Can you imagine political leaders telling those generations who endured the Great Depression and two world wars that the obstacles before them were too daunting to survive?  Yet political “leaders” today throw their hands up in the air at the first sign of trouble and scream for everyone to hear, “We’re all gonna die!” 

State-controlled news media blare continuous warnings that citizens should fear racism, “white supremacy,” misogyny, imperialism, colonialism, paternalism, Christianity, Israel, hydrocarbon energy, heterosexuality, capitalism, exercise, Karens, Chads, Western civilization, personal liberty, country music, Southern states, suburban moms, political speech, scientific debate, masculinity, democratic elections that don’t elect Democrats, Donald Trump, limited government, nuclear families, gun-toting Americans, psychologically healthy adults, Christmas decorations, assimilation, accurate history, cultural appropriation, national borders, due process for conservatives, misinformation, malinformation, disinformation, and stable marriages.  On the flip-side, the atheistic priests of the “woke” church insist that opposition to either gay pseudo-marriage or the new fad of “transgenderism” represents some kind of irrational “phobia” that must be overcome immediately.  In other words, the new world order demands that Westerners fear almost everything except bearded men crushing women half their size in competitive sports.  Talk about lunacy!

Telling people what to fear and whom to blame may be an effective short-term strategy, but it can never convincingly win hearts and minds.  Whatever darkness troubles a man’s soul, further darkness will not lead him to salvation.  You do not forge a community without some ideal flickering in the background for all to see.  You do not convince a fighting force to advance over the next hill, unless they are confident that whatever they find can also be overcome.  You do not produce healthy citizens capable of tackling the impossible unless you first teach children to be resilient and fearless. 

That the Marxist globalists in charge of the West today preach none of these lessons is definitive proof of one thing and one thing alone: they seek timid souls who may be easily conquered, not courageous human beings who can do anything.
Sponsored

If you want to prepare humanity for the battles ahead, you encourage people to value honor, integrity, personal freedom, imagination, initiative, determination, self-respect, and respect for others.  You encourage them to be humble before God and to be eternally grateful for the blessings of life shared by all.  You teach them the difference between right and wrong, vice and virtue, sin and redemption.  You teach them how to pray and how to be repentant.  If you want humanity to fail, curl up in a ball, and wither away, you forbid the teaching of any of these things.  The globalists who despise free speech and adore censorship will continue to claim that they are “protecting” people from harm.  Make no mistake: they are the harm.

So long as we remember what to cherish, no amount of government-engineered fear can succeed in subduing us all.  You will find people who believe all is lost.  You might even begin to wonder if all is lost, as well.  Yet nothing can be lost if you stand firmly beside what is true.  That kind of indomitable spirit is what the globalists most fear.  Even now, as they make plans for the dystopian future that they seek, they see the rumblings of rebellion throughout the West.  They’ve done their best to ignore the Tea Party, Brexit, Trump, and growing freedom movements from the Netherlands to Argentina.  Yet in the dark recesses of their minds, they wonder how many people might resist and refuse to go away.  They are rightly afraid of the unconquerable.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles...rable.html

Are National Governments All Following a Genocide Agenda?
By Julian Rose
December 14, 2023

No thoughtful self-respecting human being can deny that within the political institutions responsible for administrating human affairs today, there are only a tiny fraction of individuals who put responsibility for caring for fellow humans and our planet, at the top of their agenda – if at all.

‘Democracy’ is what many still believe to be the best solution for citizen governance, these same people also hold that the politicians elected via national voting systems are ‘servants of the people’, since constitutionally that is what is indicated. Members of parliament entrusted with responsibility for accounting to those who elect them.

However, is spite of the fact that the general mass of the populace cling to the dream of a world in which democracy means a form of governance being ‘of the people, by the people, for the people’, upon inspection the reality is precisely the opposite.

Those beguiling men and women who portray themselves as saviours and saints of their communities prior to their election, shape shift into self serving parasites to the program of the globalist shadow government as soon as they become elected into office.

And what does the electorate do about this?

Some allow themselves to think that such a state of affairs is somehow inevitable ‘in this corrupted world’.

Others express dismay and loudly proclaim that they will vote for the opposition party at the next election (..and get precisely the same result).  Yet others try to ignore the reality altogether, muttering cynically about ‘not voting at all in the future’.

A very small minority hold their elected representatives to account, demanding that they stand by the policies they promised to support before the election. Not that such determination necessarily produces the desired result; but it is at least honourable.

The net result of all this is that parliamentarians, senators and congressman, each of whom is primarily concerned with making a successful political career, fall instantly in line with the ‘party program’. A top-down fixed agenda, based upon the wishes of the corporate billionaire donors whose fulsome funding comes with an assurance that their support will be properly reciprocated.

Democracy in action, you understand.

The man or woman you thought was going to fight for the electorate’s interests at the local and regional level, turns out to simply be a puppet to those higher up the political pyramid. The new parliamentarians, if they didn’t know already, soon find out that the only way to keep their political prospects alive, is to follow the party agenda and never step out of line.

In the UK, any intention to deviate from the party line is greeted with the threat of being ‘whipped’, meaning being forced to comply with the will of the leaders – or face being expelled from the party.

Now that we grasp the essentially tunnel vision fixation of our party political systems, we can turn our attention to the agenda of the global shadow power nucleus around which everything is actually turning.

For those not fully aware of the motivation of this small but all powerful cabal – which prefers to remain in the shadows – it is a profound shock to be faced with the realisation that everything being visibly played-out under the predominant influence of globalisation, is an ulterior motive and charade for something considerably more sinister hatched out of sight and therefore ‘out of mind’ – of the great majority of world citizens, including most of the politicians they elect.

We don’t need to go into the details of what mainstream media calls ‘fake news’ and ‘conspiracy theories’. Those reading this article will already be more than familiar with the increasingly desperate attempt of the shadow government cabal – and therefore also the national governments they control, to discredit – or in severe cases to dispose of – those armed with truth and the determination to make it known.

Anyone not shaken to the core by events in Gaza since October 7, will also be unlikely to recognise the significance of the abject failure of nation states and their government representatives to step outside their political straightjackets and come to the rescue of a country whose essentially defenceless citizens are being systematically and brutally murdered in their thousands, in full view of everyone with a screen on their living room wall or office desk.

For the cabal, ‘non intervention’ is what it’s all about, because this shadowy sect is the motivating force behind the horror and takes a darkly parasitic interest in benefiting from the consequences.

The inability, or refusal of nations and key spokespeople to take a coordinated, international humanitarian stand in the face of this holocaust, reveals an unbroken chain reaction whose inception can be traced back to the parliamentarian I mentioned earlier, who failed to stand his ground thus capitulating to the will of senior figureheads in order not to jeopardise an overriding ambition to further his all important career.

Here is where the slide into slavery begins and the true expression of human liberty ends; the innate responsibility of the sentient, moral human, to act in the cause of truth and justice – superseded instead by the narcissistic desire to feed the demands of an insatiable ego.

Now juxtapose this with the top of the pyramid cult ambition to live-out the fantasy ‘God-King’ bloodline dream of  attaining ‘absolute power’ through ‘absolute possession’ – and the links in the chain slot into place.

Klaus Schwab’s proclamation “You will own nothing and you will be happy” simply exposes the program whereby our homes and related assets are to be confiscated in the interests of a totalitarian regime declaring itself to be the only authority able to align the whole planet with the ‘sustainable development’ goals of the Great Reset and Green New Deal.

Ironic indeed is the choice of the term ‘sustainable development’ to describe the take-over of the world by a small clique of psychopathic megalomaniacs, using the great global warming deception ‘Net Zero by 2050’ to authenticate the enforcement of its global power grab.

But it was known well in advance that this ploy would be sure to work, because less grandiose versions have already been practised successfully for decades – if not centuries – under the ‘problem, reaction, solution’ formula. Invent a crisis, provoke a reaction and come up with a solution to the problem you created.

How many cabal initiated false flags have been used to catalyse a preplanned outcome over the past twenty five years alone?

The likes of Schwab, Gates, Soros, Rockefeller and Rothschild are the visible end of this control agenda. So are the global institutions like the United Nations, World Economic Forum, World Health Organisation and European Union. Then there are the bankers like Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Layman Brothers that team-up with semi secret societies like the Bilderberg Club, Trilateral Commission, Club of Rome and Chatham House.

Also visible and boasting crushing financial powers are asset management firms like BlackRock, Vanguard and UBS. Not to mention behemoths like the Military Industrial Project and Silicon Valley.

All these, and many more of course, are the outward material expression of an inner compulsion to dominate, and in the process crush the natural order expressed in ecology, family, community, creativity, diversity and spirituality.

Answering to this vast conglomerate of aggressive globalisation parasites, are the parliaments of Nation states, playing out their subterfuge of democratic governance and ‘proper management’ of national resources.

Do they have an agenda in any way separate from the globalist cabal?

Are they standing-up for their professed ‘democratic’ belief in justice, honour and fundamental human rights?

Are they fighting to protect the sanctity of ownership, privacy and human dignity?

Are they defending the rights of their constituents to have direct access to affordable non-denatured foods free from toxins and laboratory engineered genetic distortions?

Are those who sit in these parliaments setting a worthy example by the way they conduct their own lives?

Apart from those few individuals who determinedly stand their ground and fulfill their duties of office, there is really nothing to distinguish the behaviour and attitude of those in government to those at the forefront of the globalist rape of humanity’s planetary resource base and all life forms that depend on it.

In the end, they too are agents of destruction, apologetically and passively complicit in their failure to take a stand against the crushing of all who resist a life of slavery.

So what really are governments these days?

They are institutions that offer the cowardly pretence of deliberating on the merits or demerits of adopting what is, in reality, a top down fixed and secretive agenda serving the cause of a ‘Great Reset’ and a ‘New World Order’ to be administered by a centralised AI form of robotic technocracy.

Working hand in hand with communication industry masters of mass hypnosis, they spin slavery to the cabal as ‘the proper workings of society’.

Across the world, governments handling of Covid, with very few exceptions, was a collective agreement to engage in genocide.

Is it any wonder then, that these same governments cower behind a veil of collusion in refusing to take action to prevent the mass genocide being perpetrated in Gaza?

‘We the people’ have an extraordinary challenge ahead of us in order to take back control of our destinies and ultimately our planet.

No longer should we hold any illusions about the role of our political institutions. They are a dangerous sham; a dark hypocritical playhouse whose vanity laden games with democracy are rapidly leading to self inflicted collapse.

It is most certainly not our duty to try and save them, but to adopt instead a bold, fresh and inspiring approach that brings out the best qualities of the human race, so as to break through the dystopian matrix and set in motion a true sense of direction and purpose. One able to rise above and eventually vanquish the demonic forces unashamedly intent on our complete impoverishment.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/12/no_a...de-agenda/

4th Generation Devastation: The West Has Been Targeted In A Cowardly Globalist Mind War
Brandon Smith | Alt-Market.us

When I first encountered the concept of 4th Generation Warfare around 20 years ago I was studying the basics of propaganda and how it works. While the core issue is deeply disturbing on a number of levels I also found it fascinating – The ways in which governments and elitists have endeavored to control the masses while at the same time trying to avoid direct confrontation whenever possible.

With the advent of civilian populations armed with military grade weaponry and familiar with the training required for combat, elitist groups realized (post American Revolution) that dominating the public with military might was no longer a sure bet. They had to engage in a new kind of warfare using psychological attacks until they could weaken and disarm the populace. The new system of oppressing was about mental coercion; to make people believe that the authoritarian ideal is inevitable.

One part of this strategy involves using economic leverage for social engineering. A hundred years ago it was more about banks creating an endless series of debt mechanisms and controlling the issuance of currencies. Today, corporate elites are expanding – They want to change the very nature of money through Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). By extension, they’re also trying to influence public behavior by attaching “social justice” ideology to economic participation through ESG.

In other words, if you want to have access to credit or money and have the ability to compete in the new “inclusive” marketplace, you will have to bow to the woke religion. If you refuse, your access to trade could be shut down completely, and you and your family could starve.

A greater factor in the mind war, though, is the shift of the Overton Window by making cultural pillars into cultural villains. This is being accomplished through the creation of the deconstruction religion, or what we sometimes call the “Cult of Woke.”

Name any cultural value or principle that defines the western world, such as meritocracy, independence, self reliance, mental toughness, liberty (with responsibility), legacy through hard work and family, the protection of children from perversions, discipline over hedonism, logic and reason over fanaticism, conservation of heritage and history and for many people the tenets of Christian duty. These are all pillars of our society which the woke cult seeks to destroy. In every way I can imagine it is a psychological war on the west, all of it funded through billions of dollars in grants from globalist think tanks like the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and the Open Society Foundation.

The globalists view public manipulation and social engineering as their birthright. They think it’s their manifest destiny, and they suggest often that humanity would somehow decay and self destruct without their influence.

As the famed propagandist Edward Bernays once stated:

    “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. …We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of…

    …In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”

For men like Bernays the purpose of psychological ops was more about maintaining a certain status quo, with the establishment power brokers firmly in charge but shielded from public view (and anger) as much as possible. The methodology of “shadow government” was constructed in the era of Bernays. However, what started as a tactic for keeping the populace in the dark has now become a strategy for waging war on them. 4th Gen Warfare was born from the mire of public perception management.

You might ask, though, how we are being attacked without soldiers, guns, bombs, tanks or drones? Doesn’t this sound a little paranoid?

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e...aquino.pdf

n a once obscure internal US Army document titled ‘From Psyop To Mindwar’, the military value of sabotage through 4th Generation methods is described in detail. The treatise outlines the idea of causing a target population to self enslave by undermining its core structures through psychological warfare. The paper was written in 1980 by Lt. Colonel Michael Aquino, a devout satanist, and Colonel Paul Vallely, who would later become a General.

Aquino’s theory was essentially that the US Army was under-utilizing psychological operations as a background to kinetic operations. He argued that psyops could be used as the front line weapon to destroy an enemy nation (or control a domestic population) without the exploitation of standard munitions. As Aquino suggests in a 2003 preface to Mindwar:

    “Essentially you overwhelm your enemy with argument. You seize control of all of the means by which his government and populace process information to make up their minds, and you adjust it so that those minds are made up as you desire. Everyone is happy, no one gets hurt or killed, and nothing is destroyed.”

The faux benevolence behind this idea is disturbing.  Believe it or not, this was Aquino’s attempt to “soften” the public’s perception of the document. He lamented the exposure of Mindwar among “conspiracy circles” and spent decades trying to downplay the role of occultism in the upper echelons of the military and the government. It was all a “big misunderstanding” according to the satanist.

Mindwar attempts to disconnect itself from the dark and dirty reputation of propaganda efforts among the Nazis or the Communists. Propaganda is commonly, and rightfully, associated with lying. Aquino admits that the new psyops will be used against Americans, not just foreign enemies, but this time he claims they will use “the truth” to manipulate the masses. And who gets to dictate what the truth is? Well, satanist fanatics like Aquino, of course.

The hypocrisy of Mindwar is evident in its underlying premise – That the establishment will always propagandize using the truth, because that which is a lie today can be made into the truth tomorrow. As Aquino notes:

    “Unlike PSYOP, MindWar has nothing to do with deception or even with “selected” – and therefore misleading – truth. Rather it states a whole truth that, if it does not now exist, will be forced into existence by the will of the United States.”

Mindwar as a document is itself a piece of propaganda that can’t help but twist reality to justify the vision of men who seek power above all else. I invite you to read the paper (linked above); nearly every concept described in it is being used against the American people and the western public today. The crooked arguments made in Mindwar are the same exact arguments used by current governments to justify state propaganda and mass censorship of opposing views as essential to security and the greater good.

Not to mention, the woke movement is disturbingly similar in its ideals and goals to the narcissistic religions of satanism and luciferianism that Aquino adores.  I’m sure that’s purely coincidence…

The reason that conservatives and liberty proponents have been at such a disadvantage in the midst of this “mind war” until recently is because we have an OLD way of viewing warfare that assumes a stand-up fight. They point their guns at us and try to control us, we point our guns at them and say no thanks. But not all war is designed to destroy people directly, and some wars are fought in a cowardly fashion in order to avoid direct confrontation.

Mind war proponents would argue that the tactics are similar to guerrilla methods. I would argue they are much more closely related to terrorist methods, and yes, there is a difference.

The globalists know that once the shooting starts they lose the ability to micromanage the outcome and they might become targets. The purpose of psyops is to either terrorize a population into not fighting back at all, or, to shore up popular sentiment through lies and make any potential rebellion as fringe as possible. Hence the reason for funding woke activism and indoctrinating western youth. Given a generation or two, they think they can replace the west by demonizing it in the minds of today’s children. They might never have to fight us at all.

The conflagration goes beyond “left vs right” to be sure – The globalists and their institutions are the root of the disease our civilization faces, and until that cancer is cut out we will never know peace, regardless of which side of the political spectrum comes out on top.

That said, it’s lazy to suggest that this conflict is simply a product of the false left/right paradigm. Leftists truly are a mob army fully supported by the globalists and fully serving their interests. To get to the money elites, we will likely have to roll through the leftists. Either by forcefully removing them from positions of influence over the next generation (which is what some conservative states are finally doing), or booting them out of a state or country entirely. In war, the people trying to destroy freedom no longer deserve the benefits of freedom.

The key to grasping the situation is to accept that a war is upon us. Woke is a psychological operation devised by globalists, and it is currently battling to become the one and only system of thought – A morally relativist system of thought. It relies on a specific circumstance in order to succeed: The idea that men of the west will not take on a fighting posture in the face of psychological attack. As long as we continue to see war only as fighting with guns, we will remain docile in the face of a more advanced cultural bombardment.

For 4th Gen Warfare to prevail the target population has to follow a certain set of rules while the other side operates without rules. They have to be allowed to pursue all-out destruction against their enemy while the other side is admonished for doing anything remotely defensive, including speaking up. But what happens when patriots stop caring about being admonished? What happens when the optics are no longer relevant? What happens when the goal goes from winning in politics or in the halls of public discourse to winning the actual conflagration in front of us?

When this happens, everything in America and the western world will change. For good or ill will really depend on who is left to rebuild once the smoke clears.

https://flowofwisdom.files.wordpress.com...aquino.pdf

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/4...t-mind-war

The Great Taking | Intentional Destruction
Intentional Destruction: First COVID, Now Comes "The Great Taking"

Matthew Smith | Doug Casey's Take substack

The Great Depression was a well-executed plan to seize assets, impoverish the population, and remake society. What comes next is worse...

A recent book by David Webb sheds new light on exactly what happened during the Great Depression. In Webb’s view, it was a set up.

Webb is a successful former investment banker and hedge fund manager with experience at the highest levels of the financial system. He published The Great Taking a few months ago, and recently supplemented it with a video documentary. Thorough, concise, comprehensible and FREE. Why? Because he wants everyone to understand what’s being done.

The Great Taking describes the roadmap to collapse the system, suppress the people, and seize all your assets. And it includes the receipts.

You Already Own Nothing

Webb’s book illustrates, among other things, how changes in the Uniform Commercial Code converted asset ownership into a security entitlement. The “entitlement” designation made personal property a mere contractual claim. The “entitled” person is a “beneficial” owner, but not the legal one.

In the event a financial institution is insolvent, the legal owner is the “entity that controls the security with a security interest.” In essence, client assets belong to the banks. But it’s much worse than that. This isn’t simply a matter of losing your cash to a bank bail-in. The entire financial system has been wired for a controlled demolition.

Webb describes in detail how the trap was set, and how the Great Depression provides precedent. In 1933, FDR declared a “Bank Holiday.” By executive order, banks were closed. Later, only those approved by the Fed were allowed to reopen.

Thousands of banks were left to die. People with money in those disfavored institutions lost all of it, as well as anything they’d financed (houses, cars, businesses) that they now couldn’t pay for. Then, a few “chosen” banks consolidated all the assets in the system.

Centralization and Systemic Risk

As Webb shows, the cake has been baked for years. But this week came a sign it’s coming out of the oven. Last Monday, Bloomberg admitted that measures taken to ostensibly “protect the system” actually amplify risk.

In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, G20 'leaders' mandated all standardized Over The Counter (OTC) derivatives be cleared through central counterparties (CCPs), ostensibly to reduce counter party risk and increase market transparency. The best known CCP in the US is the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC), which processes trillions of dollars of securities transactions each day.

Before 2012, OTC derivative trades were bi-lateral and counterparty risk was managed by parties to a transaction. When doing business directly with other firms, each had to make sure it was dealing with reliable parties. If they had a bad reputation or were not creditworthy, counterparties could consider them toxic and shut them out of trades. This, according to the wise G20 leadership, was too risky.

With the introduction of central clearing mandates, counterparty risk was shifted via CCPs away from the firms doing the deal to the system itself. Creditworthiness and reputation were replaced with collateral and complex models.

Brokers, banks, asset managers, hedge funds, corporations, insurance companies and other so-called "clearing parties" participate in the market by first posting collateral in the form of Initial Margin (IM) with the CCP. It's through this IM and a separate and much smaller Default Fund (DF) held at the CCP that counterparty risk is managed.

To ‘Mutualise’ Losses

Shifting risk from individual parties to the collective is a recipe for trouble. But, as explained in a recent report from the BIS, it's worse than that. The structure of CCPs themselves can cause "Margin Spirals" and "wrong-way risk" in the event of market turbulence.

In flight-to-safety episodes, CCPs hike margin requirements.  According to the BIS,

    "Sudden and large IM hikes force deleveraging by derivative counterparties and can precipitate fire sales that lead to higher volatility and additional IM hikes in so-called margin spirals."

We've already gotten a taste of what this can look like.  Similar margin spirals "occurred in early 2020 (Covid-19) and 2022 (invasion of Ukraine), reflecting the risk-sensitive nature of IM models."

Government Bonds as a source of trouble

The second area of systemic risk is the dual use of government bonds as both collateral and as underlying assets in derivatives contracts. Volatility in the government bond market can lead to a demand for more collateral underlying the derivatives markets precisely when government bond prices are declining. Falling bond prices erode the value of the existing IM.  Collateral demands skyrocket just as the value of current and would-be collateral is evaporating.

Again, the BIS:

    Wrong-way risk dynamics appeared to play a role during the 2010–11 Irish sovereign debt crisis. At that time, investors liquidated their positions in Irish government bonds after a CCP raised the haircuts on such bonds when used as collateral. This led to lower prices of Irish government bonds triggering further haircuts, further position closures and ultimately a downward price spiral.

Designed to fail

The BIS doesn’t admit it, but Webb says the CCPs themselves are deliberately under-capitalized and designed to fail. The start-up of a new CCP is planned and pre-funded. When that happens, it’ll be the “secured creditors” who will take control of ALL the underlying collateral.

Once more, the BIS:

    …to mutualise potential default losses in excess of IM, CCPs also require their members to contribute to a default fund (DF). As a result, CCPs are in command of large pools of liquid assets.

That “large pool of liquid assets” is the full universe of traded securities.

In a market collapse, the stocks and bonds you think you own will be sucked into the default fund (DF) as additional collateral for the evaporating value of the derivatives complex. This is “The Great Taking”.

Buffett’s famous line rings true: “You only find out who is swimming naked when the tide goes out.”  Most of us are on the verge of learning that we’re the ones without any clothes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk3AVceraTI

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/i...eat-taking

What Happened? The Disappearing of Heinous Events as Agenda Building Continues
By Gary D. Barnett
December 18, 2023

“When the flood of truth becomes a drought, the lush throats of liars shall shrilly fill the vacuum with their false fruit. None shall taste its maggoty putrescence and devour it whole.”

~ Stewart Stafford

We live in a time where all that seems to exist as ‘news,’ is simply purposely manufactured perception, all predicated on building false narratives meant to disappear before the paint is dry, in order to hide the truth. These past four years have brought about one heinous event after another, and from every angle possible. Most all of these events eventually, if not nearly immediately, disappear from headlines as the next shoe to drop (plotted operation) takes its place. This has become the common denominator of reporting, and since the Zionist Israeli false flag ‘attack,’ the slaughter and brutal murder of innocent Palestinians at the hands of evil Zionists, most all other atrocious past events and false flags have been eliminated from the so-called headlines. It is my opinion, all of this is of course by design; purposely planned long in advance, in order to set up the masses for the imminent global rule that is sought by the ruling class.

Of course along the way more and more restrictive legislation, extreme regulation, mass surveillance methods, monetary, economic, and inflationary policies, and war and the threat of war, continues unabated; merely stages in the conspiracy to control the world and its people. In other words, it is like a step by step vial and corrupt foisting of terroristic events on the commoners in order to advance political agendas based on the stacking of false narratives one after the other; meant to keep the proletariat scared and confused at all times.

I went over the scope of all this intentional State terror used against us just recently, and outlined much of what has been going on consecutively over these past few years in an article I published titled: “The Risks We Face in a World Gone Mad: State Narratives Are Always Lies.” Since these latest and most malevolent attacks against mankind, beginning with the fake ‘covid’ pandemic that launched this final push toward world slavery under the guise of a global one-world governing system, one unrelenting heinous event after another has been evident. The string of atrocities at the hands of the ruling class masters, and their owned and controlled governments since 2020, has been never-ending in nature, which has served to keep the ignorant and indifferent masses off balance, divided, confused, and most importantly for the controllers, compliant.

What has happened to all the families devastated due to the ‘covid’ scam? Where are all the stories of families torn apart, of the death of loved ones, of the sickness and horrendous health consequences of all those who fell prey to the State’s bioweapon injections, and what about the rampant hatred bred by this plot to destroy humanity? What happened due to all the planned and staged riots and destruction caused by State actors like BLM and Antifa, the mass inflationary storm that has destroyed so many, and what happened to all those who lost their businesses due to this government’s purposeful gross mandates and intervention? How are all these people who were financially destroyed able to feed themselves and their families?

What have been the consequences of this government’s intentional promotion of immoral and illicit behaviors, especially on the young and impressionable, due to the pushing of transgender identity idiocy, gruesome sex-change surgeries, and the planned extermination of biologic men and women in favor of mindless neutered beings?

What has happened to the brutalized and poisoned victims of East Palestine, Ohio, as they have been ignored and forgotten because it is now old news. This is in the midst of extreme sickness there, and high levels of toxic dioxins, up 14,000%. Why is this coverup allowed, especially given that Norfolk Southern is eliminating all its relocation aid, even though they are responsible for this atrocity? And what about all the other very suspicious train derailments and chemical spills all over this country these past few years?

What has happened to the false flag ‘war’ between Russia and Ukraine, especially since the U.S. with your money and in your name, has given billions upon billions of taxpayer dollars to the fraudulent war in Ukraine? How many innocents have died due to U.S. funding and weaponizing of Zelinskyy and his terrorists whose job it is to prolong this farce, while getting rich in the process?

What happened to all the reporting about the horrendous ‘fires’ that consumed Lahaina, (Maui) Hawaii? What happened to all those people, and the 2,000 missing children? Why has this been eliminated from most all news reports and hidden from the world? What happened to all the stories of intentionally set fires in California, Canada, Hawaii, Greece, Turkey, China, and many other places

These are but a very few of all the stories that have disappeared from view. There are a multitude of new reports, new war risks, new atrocities, and new threats on a constant basis, all meant to claim your immediate attention, while the real agendas are continually pursued, mostly without critical exposure or scrutiny. The recent ‘news’ of course, has been related to the slaughter and genocide by Zionist Israel of mostly innocent Palestinian people. This is a joint effort between Israel and the U.S., working hand in hand to commit mass murder on a monumental scale. While many rulers in the West joined hands with Israel,  the blatant genocide has caused some to back away; not because they care about the Palestinians mind you, but because the obvious brutality has turned some against this barbarism due to fear of reprisal. But do not worry, the next false flag, the next big report, will at some point replace this one, and the elimination of the Palestinians will also fade away as if it never happened.

I have barely scratched the surface of all that is happening today. This assault against humanity will continue on, until its finality of a complete takeover of mankind is fulfilled. The final push toward global rule of everyone and everything will culminate with the fake ‘climate change’ agenda, when all is digital, when rule is universal, when all currency is centrally controlled, when most all wars will be waged against the masses by their own countries, all in a democidal effort to not only lower world populations dramatically, but to transform those remaining populations into machine-like beings, both physically and psychologically, in a world consumed by transhuman alteration through AI technology.

Pay attention to each and every transgression by nation-state players, as it is likely meant to distract, while causing the latest atrocity to be forgotten. New stories that consume the ‘news’ cycles, every new so-called threat, every new risk of war, any claimed weather anomaly, any geo-political catastrophe or assassination, will be used to divert your attention. Never forget all that has happened and is still happening to destroy humanity and any remaining freedom or dissent that is still active.

There is reason behind this madness being perpetrated by the State, as the ruling segment of society and the governments they control, know exactly how to manipulate the minds of the mindless, keeping them occupied with new atrocities and threats constantly, thus allowing for ease of control. Do not forget the real victims, or you will lose everything by becoming just another victim yourself.

“We have reached a point in history where intellectual incapacitation feels like wholeness, and where forgetting trumps remembering.”

~ Antonella Gambotto

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/12/gary...continues/
Reply

#2
The Era of the West Has Passed
Paul Craig Roberts

Globalists, who intend the destruction of sovereign nations, have labeled concerns with mass immigration to be racism as a way of discrediting the concerns and preventing discussion of the threat.  Immigrant-invaders, or as the euphemisms “refugees” and “asylum seekers” label them, are used to overwhelm ethnic nationalities and turn them into towers of babel in which there are no common interests, values, morals, religion, or culture.

A tower of babel is not a nation.  At best it is a geographical location, but it is not even that if it has no borders, which the US and Europe do not have.

Advocates of open borders say that the US is a nation of immigrants.  But they don’t say that it was controlled immigration consisting of immigrants from white European countries who as a condition of admittance had to learn English, pass an exam on the US Constitution, and integrate themselves into the existing society and culture.  They were not allowed to set up separate cultures, and businesses answered the phone only in English. Additionally, the immigration was periodically halted in order to allow time for assimilation before accepting more immigrants.

Today millions of non-white people from unrelated cultures walk across the border every year.  Businesses answer telephones in Spanish and English.  Federal agencies respond to 40 or more foreign languages.  Separate cultures with non-Christian religions exist as independent entities, and a system of preferences that favors non-white people has been institutionalized. 

In other words the society, politics, and culture of the ethnic nationalities that created what formerly was a nation are being erased.  In education, health care, business, and government power is passing out of the hands of the ethnic majority that created the nation.  Great Britain has an Indian prime minister. The London mayor is a Muslim.  Recently two federal judges born in India ruled against President Trump, a ruling that violates both the Constitution and powers of the President. The CEO of IBM, Arvind Krishna is an Indian.  He pulled IBM ads from X, accusing Elon Musk of racism, and he announced that he will fire, demote, or strip bonuses from IBM managers who don’t hire enough blacks, Hispanics, and Muslims, or who hire too many Asians and whites. 

The communications director of Red Hat, an IBM subsidiary, said that Red Hat had terminated employees because they weren’t willing to engage in racial discrimination through hiring and promotion quotas.

Hiring, promotion, and “inclusion” quotas are violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and they are unconstitutional under the US Constitution and its amendments, such as the 14th.

But notice that the Indian running IBM has no hesitancy about using his power to force IBM executives and managers to violate US law and Constitution in order to advance “preferred minorities” at the expense of members of the white ethnic majority and Asians.  This is what happens when a nation ceases to require assimilation.  The CEO of IBM is an unassimilated immigrant who has no respect for US law or the US Constitution. 

An article by Ian Henderson in Chronicles magazine in July, 2022, showed that, unlike Western governments, both Russia and China protect the ethnic culture from immigrants and prevent cultural destruction by Woke ideologues and moral destruction by sexual perverts. https://chroniclesmagazine.org/view/why-...-the-west/

Henderson points out that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) “strongly upholds traditional views on gender roles, race, sexuality, and family—more so than the Republican Party or mainstream conservatives in America. A major example of China’s conservatism is the CCP’s view on LGBTQ rights. Same-sex couples are unable to marry or adopt, and households headed by such couples are ineligible for the same legal protections available to heterosexual couples, and no anti-discrimination protections exist for LGBTQ people. Contrast these policies with the views of mainstream American conservatism, which now seems deeply committed to gay marriage, an institution enthusiastically endorsed by the likes of National Review and the National Conservatism Conference.”

“In short, Chinese leaders seek to promote masculinity and strength, and to uphold and expand their inherited Han civilization. They feel they cannot do that with homosexuals, transgenders, or feminists running government institutions and the military—or even exerting influence over forms of entertainment.”

“Another way that the CCP tries to protect its youth is by a recently mandated limit of three hours per week for online gaming and by prohibiting it altogether during school days. The CCP has further mandated that game developers must submit new titles for government approval before their release, and the developers are encouraged to include nationalistic themes.

“Instead of allowing their youth to descend into unlimited virtual gaming, the government has financially backed fitness and discipline camps (akin to Boy Scouts on steroids) for elementary, middle, and high school–aged boys. While this may seem drastic, the CCP leadership sees these moves as necessary to prevent China’s youth from becoming like the West’s increasingly feminized and entitled generation, who prioritize trans rights, political correctness, and diversity over the preservation of national identity and inherited social mores.”

Russia also “has strict laws limiting homosexual expression and supporting traditional gender roles, Christian morals, and national identity.” Russia’s strong immigration laws have widespread support.

In short, “Self-hatred in the form of questioning societal mores, gender roles, the concepts of parenthood and family, national identity, and so forth, seems to be a uniquely Western, postmodern phenomenon. After centuries of the glacial advance of liberalization, the West’s embrace of cultural Marxism, guilt, and self-hatred sprang into existence with the countercultural movement of the 1960s, snowballing into feminism, LGBTQ rights, and the rejection of the nuclear family. This upheaval, coupled with almost unrestricted immigration, degraded the religious and cultural components of the older Western order and brought forth a disjointed, multicultural America.”

In contrast to the enfeebled, feminized, deracinated culture that characterizes the entirety of the Western world, China and Russia uphold a strong, masculine, traditional culture and protect it from deracination.  It is completely obvious that the era of the West is over.

What are conservative values? Freedom of speech? Free markets? Guns? Not necessarily. Although relevant, these things do not define what it means to preserve one’s civilization and way of life. That task requires the active protection of heritage, traditions, religious values, traditional gender roles, native fertility rates above replacement levels, strong nuclear families, strong borders, restrictive immigration laws, and a common national identity. The guns, free speech, and free markets can only exist if the underlying structures are intact. Without those structures, a nation cannot survive and thrive. America is failing in these basic requirements—but Russia and China are not.

Nevertheless, Democrats and Republicans alike decry both China and Russia for their authoritarian ways and suppression of freedom. China, for example, is guilty of oppressing the Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang Province and the pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong, of surveilling their citizens, of implementing social credit scores, of control over media and banning of Western news sources. Russia, likewise, is known for the arrest, detention, and torture of Russian democracy activist Alexei Navalny for the alleged rigging of Russian elections in favor of the United Russia Party and its allies, for its invasion of Ukraine and seizure and annexation of Crimea as well as for the arming and backing of breakaway states in Ukraine and Georgia.

Although American politicians and the American media highlight and occasionally exaggerate the oppressive features of these foreign regimes, partly to glorify their sometimes-idealized alternative, there is no reason to deny that these governments do unpleasant things. That is unfortunately the case. But they also show a socially conservative side that is worth exploring. Let us consider China first.

It is true that Mao’s five-year plan and cultural revolution were disastrous and resulted in the deaths of millions. He attempted to eradicate traditional Chinese culture and impose his interpretation of cultural Marxism on his entire society. But this experiment faded with Mao’s demise in 1976 and the transfer of power to Deng Xiaopeng, who was more of a pragmatist. Even to this day, Xi Jinping, who has amassed complete control over the CCP and created a cult of personality rivaling Mao’s, remains a nationalist and has gradually moved the CCP away from the fine points of Marxist thought, much to the chagrin of the die-hard Marxists of the party’s past.

The CCP, while authoritarian, strongly upholds traditional views on gender roles, race, sexuality, and family—more so than the Republican Party or mainstream conservatives in America. A major example of China’s conservatism is the CCP’s view on LGBTQ rights. Same-sex couples are unable to marry or adopt, and households headed by such couples are ineligible for the same legal protections available to heterosexual couples, and no anti-discrimination protections exist for LGBTQ people. Contrast these policies with the views of mainstream American conservatism, which now seems deeply committed to gay marriage, an institution enthusiastically endorsed by the likes of National Review and the National Conservatism Conference.

The online availability of South Korean and American popular entertainment has made some young Chinese more open in their support for LGBTQ issues. Because the CCP has complete control over media and entertainment, however, the state has acted in recent years to block and ban all LGBTQ-related issues on various platforms, such as Weibo, China’s equivalent of Facebook. Also outlawed is the depiction on television of effeminate men—known as niang pao, or “girlie guns.” The CCP is clearly and understandably concerned about the effect of effeminate Chinese pop stars on China’s youth. In addition, the Mao-era All China Women’s Federation, which was founded to promote the Marxist view of women’s rights, has gradually taken the backseat in the modern CCP and is dwindling in membership.

In short, Chinese leaders seek to promote masculinity and strength, and to uphold and expand their inherited Han civilization. They feel they cannot do that with homosexuals, transgenders, or feminists running government institutions and the military—or even exerting influence over forms of entertainment.

Another way that the CCP tries to protect its youth is by a recently mandated limit of three hours per week for online gaming and by prohibiting it altogether during school days. The CCP has further mandated that game developers must submit new titles for government approval before their release, and the developers are encouraged to include nationalistic themes.

Instead of allowing their youth to descend into unlimited virtual gaming, the government has financially backed fitness and discipline camps (akin to Boy Scouts on steroids) for elementary, middle, and high school–aged boys. While this may seem drastic, the CCP leadership sees these moves as necessary to prevent China’s youth from becoming like the West’s increasingly feminized and entitled generation, who prioritize trans rights, political correctness, and diversity over the preservation of national identity and inherited social mores.

The irony of all this is that while China censors and outlaws cultural Marxist behavior within China, it actively encourages the same in the West; in other words, the CCP is keenly aware of the destructive nature of “woke” politics. The party actively promotes the Black Lives Matter movement in the West and purchases ownership stakes in Western entertainment companies. This allows the Chinese government to push a feminized Western culture while simultaneously showing Chinese culture as a masculine one with soaring global power.

Since the rise of Xi, the CCP has expanded into developing countries via predatory lending policies, promising to pay for major development projects in exchange for special access to resources, control of major ports, or the installation of military bases. It has built man-made islands in the South China Sea to assert control over global trade routes. In the West, the CCP has secured major business deals and purchased majority shareholder status in publicly traded companies through state-owned enterprises and loyal private corporations, in order to exert influence over Western countries. It has also encouraged or intimidated ethnic Han overseas to remain loyal to the will of the party and the nation, even if they are not Chinese citizens. The CCP, being ethno-nationalists, see anyone that is ethnically Han as part of the greater Chinese diaspora and therefore required to come to the party’s aid.

    While China censors and outlaws cultural Marxist behavior within China, it actively encourages the same in the West; in other words, the CCP is keenly aware of the destructive nature of “woke” politics.

The CCP’s reduced presence would likely be a good thing for the West, but there are unanswered questions. Notwithstanding the global political and economic power vacuum that would arise as a result, the establishment of a Western, state-of-the-art liberal democracy in China would not be a good fit for the Chinese people. The global corporate forces that are tearing down Western culture would attempt to do the same for China and would have a field day inflicting their progressive ideas, lifestyles, and products to a brand-new market of 1.4 billion customers. It would end up like its counterpart, Taiwan, which is steadily becoming more woke under the ruling Democratic Progressive Party, which promotes feminism and LGBTQ rights. This is a direct result of Western media and pop culture influence, and exactly what the CCP wishes to avoid.

In an ideal world, the restoration of a traditionalist monarch, which China had during the Qing Dynasty and prior to the later nationalist government of Chiang Kai-shek, would preserve China’s ancient cultural traditions. But that is not likely to happen. Born from cultural revolution, the Communist Party of China has ironically become the preserver of the traditional Chinese nation under today’s globalist economic and political system.

We in the West criticize, sanction, and virtue signal China for human rights abuses such as cracking down on Hong Kong protesters and persecuting Uighur Muslims. Meanwhile, the CCP gladly appeals to Western corporate greed in order to turn our wokeness against us.

What about Russia? Why is it that the successor state to the evil Soviet Empire has strict laws limiting homosexual expression and supporting traditional gender roles, Christian morals, and national identity? Why didn’t Russia fall into the same cultural Marxist milieu that other white, onetime Christian nations have been experiencing?

Following the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the destruction of the centuries-old Russian Empire, Vladimir Lenin attempted briefly to introduce liberal social policies. His reign was short-lived, as he died of an illness in 1924, and was succeeded by the much more socially conservative Joseph Stalin. Stalin was far more brutal than his predecessor but also far more nationalistic. Under Stalin, the Soviet Union was economically Communist but featured profoundly patriotic art and music, and discouraged such modern innovations as twelve-tone music and abstract art.

Stalin took this line to enhance social discipline while working to increase Russia’s population through the glorification of motherhood. Stalin outlawed homosexuality, placed restrictions on divorce, and shut down the short-lived Zhenotdel, a state-run organization set up by the Bolsheviks to promote a feminist agenda. These policies have left their mark on today’s Russia, where even the present Russian Communist Party joined the very conservative United Russia Party in ardently supporting a 2013 law banning the promotion of homosexuality in the Russian Federation.

Despite decriminalizing homosexual acts in 1993, Russia classified homosexuality as a mental illness in 1999, and same-sex couples are ineligible for the legal protections available to opposite-sex couples. There are currently no separate laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation in Russia. Transgender people are allowed to change their legal gender following sex reassignment surgery; however, there are currently no laws prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity or expression, and recent laws could discriminate against transgender residents. Although gay and lesbian individuals are legally allowed to serve openly in the military, there is a de facto “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. In 2012, gay pride parades were outlawed nationwide until the year 2112—simply because Russian laws can only exist on the books for 100 years, after which they have to be renewed.

The Russia of the 1990s saw a religious reversal by the Russian state, from mandating atheism to promoting church membership. Despite the prior Communist
oppression of religion, religiosity sprang back with vigor after the downfall of the Soviet Union. Today, President Vladimir Putin and his ruling United Russia Party have a close working relationship with the Russian Orthodox Church, and the nation is overwhelmingly Christian, with the exceptions in the historically Muslim Caucasus region and Buddhist regions along the Mongolian border.

Russian identity remains strong, with most regions supporting the ruling United Russia Party. Strong immigration laws also exist and enjoy widespread support.

In Russia and China, despite their longtime Communist regimes, the Marxist ideology has not taken root. There is no guilt or self-hatred for past actions, and the few that actually do espouse these ideas are societal outcasts, not recipients of book deals or television stardom, like in the West. The nuclear family and traditional gender roles remain intact. In Russia’s case, this allowed for an easy transition to embracing the Orthodox Church after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. In China’s case, despite remaining Communist, traditional ideas about nation, race, gender, sexuality, and family stand strong, indeed with support from the Communist Party.

Self-hatred in the form of questioning societal mores, gender roles, the concepts of parenthood and family, national identity, and so forth, seems to be a uniquely Western, postmodern phenomenon. After centuries of the glacial advance of liberalization, the West’s embrace of cultural Marxism, guilt, and self-hatred sprang into existence with the countercultural movement of the 1960s, snowballing into feminism, LGBTQ rights, and the rejection of the nuclear family. This upheaval, coupled with almost unrestricted immigration, degraded the religious and cultural components of the older Western order and brought forth a disjointed, multicultural America.

In their desire to destroy their own heritage, America’s neoconservative and neoliberal elites won’t stop at implementing cultural Marxism domestically. These cosmopolitans want to spread these morally subversive ideas to traditional cultures globally. Through the United States Agency for International Development, the federal government spends taxpayer dollars on promoting LGBTQ and women’s rights in developing nations. And this doesn’t include the numerous nongovernmental organizations that work in lockstep to push the same neoliberal ideas onto cultures that simply have no interest in American democracy, women’s rights, and the LGBTQ agenda.

Apparently, the complete restructuring of their own society just wasn’t enough for the Western elites; they desperately want the people of nations like Afghanistan to embrace liberal democracy and be sexually liberated and feminized—just like America—while also bombing them into submission. It’s no wonder that Russia and China, by way of contrast, seem appealing to many of these developing nations. Russia and China want to exploit the resources of these countries, yes—but at least they don’t attempt to impose ideology or to destroy the native cultures.

A comparison of recent Russian and Chinese military recruitment ads with America’s underscores a simple reality: Russia and China promote and uphold a strong, masculine, traditional culture that wishes to make its mark on the world, while America promotes a weak, feminized, sensitive culture that placates women, minorities, disabled, and homosexuals in an effort to have a more inclusive and caring military.

In 50 years, the real warriors of the United States military will have retired and what is left will be an inclusive, multicultural, multilingual, multireligious smorgasbord composed of sensitive men, women, and nonbinary people who prioritize feelings over national defense. Which nation is likely to win in the battle for global dominance, then? Let’s think about that.

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2023/12...has-passed
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.