Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How It All Fits Together: Covid, 5G, Nanotech, Transhumanism & Charles Lieber.
#1
https://truth11.com/2022/02/07/how-it-al...es-lieber/

The wireless future is here. The model ostensibly turns human beings, via nano-implants, into antennas that can transmit information. They’re turning human beings into quasi-machines. Under this transhumanist agenda, the idea is to place nanotech inside our bodies we can communicate in real-time with the Smart Grid powered by way of 5G.

The 4th Industrial Transhumanist IOB Graphene Nanobot Revolution.
It’s called the ‘internet of bodies’ (IoB) or the ‘nanotech of things,’ (NToT), and it connects with the Internet of Things (IOT). One way this is accomplished is to embed graphene-made sensors into fabrics. Another is to implant or ingest the nanotech matter into the body, creating an internal technology platform.

https://i0.wp.com/vaxxter.com/wp-content...C296&ssl=1

For instance, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla described the first-ever FDA-approved ‘electronic pill,’ which will invite ‘compliance,’ by sending a signal to your ‘doctor’ that you have indeed swallowed your ‘medication.’

“What we will see is a kind of fusion of the physical, digital, and biological world,” says Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum.

Oh Klausy!

In order for all this connectivity to occur, these particles must contain GRAPHENE, a superconductive material that integrates with neurons in the body and brain. Nanotech, pioneered by Nanotech King Charles Lieber, is completely unregulated. Arguably, it already exists in food, drugs, vaccines, water., and the air we breathe. While there is no shortage of studies devoted to graphene-based nanomaterials (GBNs), systematic research on human health or environmental effects is severely lacking.

And yet integrating humans with hardware is supposedly being sold to us for our safety and health. In fact, on a site called Nano Robot Inventor, a 2008 paper titled Nanorobots to improve health care states:

“Recent developments in the field of nanoelectronics, with transducers progressively shrinking down to smaller sizes through nanotechnology and carbon nanotubes, are expected to result in innovative biomedical instrumentation possibilities, with new therapies and efficient diagnosis methodologies.”

Lieber confirms:

“A transistor also allows the application of a voltage pulse, such devices might one day provide hybrid biological-digital computation, or deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s patients, or serve as an interface for a prosthetic that requires information processing at the point where it attaches to its owner.”

By the way, Lieber worked for communist China. Lieber has also worked on highly sensitive research projects for the US government Department of Defense (DOD).

Back in the 1930s, the CCP invented what is now known as “brainwashing.” The term is a literal translation of the Chinese term, Xi Nau, or “wash brain.” Arguably, Lieber has helped China and others upgrade to a modern version of mind control.

“ I was one of the first people — in 1998 — to figure out how to grow these nanoscale wires,” Lieber has stated.

If you do not believe me, just do a search for his brain-controlled mouse. And yet, Lieber went from supposed spy to a convicted tax evader. Who has explored the ethics of his inventions? It has already been proven that Lieber’s “injectable electronics” can be integrated within the brain with ‘minimal invasions,’ and can continue to function for at least a year. Who knows what happens after that?

The Purpose of AI: Brain-Computer Interface
At Code Conference 2016, Elon Musk stated publicly that given the current rate of artificial intelligence (AI) advancement, humans could ultimately expect to be left behind cognitively, intellectually “by a lot.” His solution to this unappealing fate is a novel brain-computer interface.

The internet of bodies (IoB) will tell us a lot, too. The sensors placed inside each person’s body will collect data…and that data has been determined to be more precious than oil.

To put things in perspective, ‘Big Harma’, with the help of Big Tech, began usurping the medical data of millions of Americans as early as 2019. You can read my article titled Dr. Google Will See You Now. Alphabet, Google’s parent company, acquired FitBit for a cool $2.1 billion. Now, in Year Three of the Rona Regime, they are coming after us.

Imagine how much information they can technically collect by giving us a ‘viability score.’ In the Netherlands, their biometric mass surveillance practices are increasingly being used to control people’s access to healthcare, sports venues, travel, shopping, and other everyday activities. Activists actually have a campaign called ‘reclaim your face.’

While globalists aim to vaccinate the world and watch as our fellow man turns into ‘Magneto Man’, evidence indicates that Big Harma, aided and abetted by VERY sick Rockefeller hospitals, are injecting us with nanoparticles meant to respond to signals while –oops – changing our very nature and DNA.

I understand, this sounds conspiratorial. If you haven’t gotten the memo that some of these jabs contain saline, why others have been sullied with microscopic nanoparticles that are conductive, consider:

In 2017, in a now-scrubbed-off-the-internet was a study from taly looking at adjuvants. Researchers found that 15 traditional vaccines (and 44 variations of these), all manufactured by leading global companies, shared a previously unreported and troubling similarity: the vaccines were “heavily contaminated with a variety of nanoparticles.”

This is an indisputable fact. You just can’t see them. A nanometer is 1/80000th the diameter of an eyelash, one-millionth the size of a pinhead.

“If your nanoparticles self-assemble correctly with Harvard’s Charles Lieber injectable nano meshes, you can actually get a nice little wireless nano network going in the target,” says Investigative Journalist George Webb, who has looked into Lieber and the Wuhan origin story since 2020. “Corona didn’t just launch DARPA’s mRNA technology, Corona also launched nanotechnology for immunology. Gold, silver, iron oxide, silicon dioxide, and graphene are all nanoparticles being researched for COVID applications.”

It’s all part of the Covid Industrial Complex.

Cinco Geo Your Existence
In January 2020, when people in Wuhan began dropping like flies, I surmised that maybe nanotech — brought to us by Charlie Lieber via a mandated experimental injection or sprayed via drones – was parlaying with the Internet of Things. Interestingly, Wuhan, the capital of China’s Hubei Province was the first 5G demonstration zone in the Central Business District (CBD), according to a 5G cooperation agreement signed between China Mobile and local authorities on September 3, 2019.

That’s how I uncovered the connection between Lieber to 5G. It was taboo to talk about 5G back in 2020, so I coined the code words, Cinco Geo, to ward off censorship. For the record, I lived across the street from a test cell tower in Beachwood, Los Angeles. I developed a fever for 65 days and couldn’t sleep. While I could not prove it was the radiation, a meter endorsed by Dr. Mercola proved the 5G technology was definitely turned ON. That was 2019.

Fast forward to 2020.

As we were locking down over the virus, cell towers across the country were going up. In fact, 5G cell tower installation was the only industry that was thriving during the early to mid-2020.

When it came to appealing net neutrality, Ajit Pai, the former Trump-appointed chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) said that the government had no place in the private sector. However, when it came to 5G, the government wasn’t only a necessity, it was a requirement. For example, when I recently called Miami-Dade County to try to find out whether they had amplified the 5G signal, I was referred to the federal government.

In fact, in 2018, the FCC initiated the “5G Fast Plan” to establish the United States’ superiority in the tech race. They intended to blanket the ENTIRE country with 5G small cells placed between every 2 to 10 homes. The industry claims they need so many towers because 5G uses millimeter waves that travel small distances and can be easily blocked by walls and even foliage. To compensate for this, engineers found ways to convert the waves to beams and intentionally direct them.

For the record, the CEO of Verizon helped bust the myth of millimeter waves and said that indeed the signals could penetrate through foliage and that the waves can cross 2000 feet from transmitter to receiver. And yet small cells continued to be built.

The 5G Fast Plan
As part of the 5G Fast Plan, the FCC reformed rules that had been designed decades ago to accommodate small cells. The reforms were designed to ban ‘short-sighted’ municipalities who tried to block the deployment of the 5G technology. Local governments were given a reasonable deadline to approve or disapprove small-cell tower applications.

Small groups of people throughout the nation have attended local meetings to fight these eyesores but they don’t really stand a chance. At best, if the municipalities have money, the 5G poles are moved to another neighborhood. Of course, health studies on 5G have not been conducted.

On January 19, the day I got sick with what felt like radiation exposure, flights were suspended to the U.S., including to Miami, over 5G concerns. I threw up three times. I had watery stools. I felt anxious. I almost fainted in yoga class. And, I lost my sense of smell. I thought it was the Rona. But I wasn’t sick with the flu or cold symptoms. I had no cough or respiratory issues. My symptoms didn’t match the Moronic variant. One friend told me, ‘you must have gotten the Delta.’ I laughed to myself. Upon doing research, I also learned that the CDC acknowledges something called Acute Radiation Syndrome.

https://i0.wp.com/vaxxter.com/wp-content...C211&ssl=1

Can You See The (Smart) Light?
Did you know that every lighting installation can be a data infrastructure? Two-way communication can also be done via light signals.

Think cellphones and streetlights.

Analysts predict the smart lighting market will grow more than 21% a year between 2018 and 2023. Much of this growth will be driven by wireless installations – and the exciting new applications they support. That’s why one company is putting Bluetooth low energy (BLE) technology in their connected components, enabling every fixture to communicate wirelessly with nearby Bluetooth-enabled smartphones.

Will wireless lighting controls soon be the new normal, making the benefits of smart lighting more accessible to organizations everywhere?

Ping, Collect, Ping, Ping
Let’s recap how all this connects (pun intended).

Seamless human-machine interaction is increasing rapidly.

What if these injections were never “vaccines” against a virus? What if instead, the jabs have been a secret nanotech project developed to control the brains of the human population? (Until now, we don’t know specifically how they can modify our DNA via 5G).

Seemingly, some jabs were manufactured using nanotechnology. In Spain, it was even described as “secret nanoparticles.” These nanoparticles become magnetic when they reach the same temperature as the human body. When they remain in an under-zero-degree environment, they remain non-magnetic. Maybe one of the reasons they use the injections?

The graphene hydroxide works as an antenna for the electronic circuits they are injecting. If they can create transistors, they can also make an identifier like an RFID chip that can ping a number back, once the person is near a radiofrequency (RF) field. Graphene oxide in the brain creates transistors, and ostensibly its own network.

Thanks in big part to Lieber, molecules of GRAPHENE can interact with neurons in the brain in a remote mode using different radiofrequencies (5G could be one of these). Can they also map the brain and transmit and receive INSTRUCTIONS remotely? Do these nano devices and smart biosensors become programmable? Yes!

Consider the following passages from a 2008 paper:

“… In the proposed platform architecture, different programs and commands can be sent and information retrieved from inside [the] body through wireless communication, providing important aspects on the interface and medical instrumentation of nanorobots.”

“The proposed model uses electromagnetic radio waves to command and detect the current status of nanorobots inside the body. Therefore, the cell phone is applied for the medical nanorobotics platform. This occurs as the cell phone emits a magnetic signature to the passive CMOS sensors embedded in the nanorobot, which enables sending and receiving data through electromagnetic fields. From the last set of events recorded in pattern arrays, information can be reflected back by wave resonance.”

What happens when you integrate communication with nanorobots using RFID, mobile phones, and satellites and apply it to long-distance ubiquitous surveillance and health monitoring?

The jury is still not out.

“We are in a live exercise here …. to get this right!” Sec. Mike Pompeo stated during a presser back in January 2020.

“You should have let us know,” President Trump murmured back.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Hissil's post:
  • Richard
Reply

#2
The Three Phases of COVID Vaccine Mortality

https://breaking-news.ca/the-three-phase...mortality/

https://i0.wp.com/thewatchtowers.org/wp-...C831&ssl=1

https://i0.wp.com/thewatchtowers.org/wp-...C810&ssl=1

https://prepareforchange.net/2022/02/20/...-questions

What is wireless technology? (FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS)

Wireless technology is any means of sending information or energy through space
without wires. It includes:
• satellites, radar, radio, television, cell towers, cell phones, cordless phones,
microwave ovens
• smart meters, WiFi, Bluetooth, fitness trackers, smart watches, baby monitors
• wireless keyboards, mice, printers, headphones and speakers, wireless
security systems, wireless car keys, wireless garage door openers, wireless
battery chargers, remote controls, wireless microphones
• RFID chips in credit cards and driver’s licenses, radio collars and chips in
wildlife, cattle and pets, chips in home appliances
• wireless hearing aids, assistive listening devices, medical alert pendants, chips
in medical implants, wireless pacemakers
• autonomous vehicles, drones, and robots
• numerous other radio–enabled devices that are proliferating in today’s world

2
Every one of these devices, without exception, emits radiation.
What’s wrong with wireless technology?
By substituting radiation for wires, we are swimming in an ocean of artificial
electromagnetic fields that are interfering with life itself. We are in effect
electrocuting ourselves, our children, our pets, the insects, birds, animals, trees and
plants around us and all of living creation. We are killing our planet.
This is about long–term exposure, right? Cancer that takes years to
develop?
No. The effects are rapid. Heart rate changes immediately. Blood sugar rises in
minutes. Having wireless devices on in your house interferes with your sleep and
your memory. Using a cell phone destroys brain cells in minutes to hours, and can
cause a stroke or a heart attack. Studies show that even cancer can develop within
months of first exposure. When a cell tower is turned on, birds leave the area
immediately. Insects disappear. Even slugs and snails vanish. Most of this takes no
time at all.
What types of radiation are used in wireless technology?
All frequencies of radio waves, microwaves, infrared radiation, visible light, lasers,
sound waves, even nuclear radiation. Most home devices use microwaves.
Isn’t microwave radiation natural? Don’t microwaves come from the
sun and stars?
Almost all the radiation we receive from the universe is the light and heat from the
sun, not microwave radiation. The microwave radiation a person receives from an
average cell tower is millions of times stronger than all the microwave radiation from
the sun and stars. The microwave radiation a person’s brain receives from their cell
phone is billions of times stronger than the microwave radiation from the sun and
stars. And at any particular frequency it is trillions of times stronger than the
microwave radiation he or she receives from the sun and stars at that frequency.
And the faint microwaves from the sun and stars are not pulsed and modulated. It is
the pulsations and modulation that cause much of the harm.

3
Aren’t light and microwaves both electromagnetic? Therefore isn’t
microwave radiation safe?
No. That is like saying arsenic is safe because oxygen and arsenic are both elements,
or that cyanide is safe because water and cyanide are both chemicals. But oxygen
and water are necessary for life, while arsenic and cyanide are deadly poisons. It is
the same with electromagnetic radiation. Visible light is necessary for life.
Microwave radiation is a deadly poison.
Aren’t toxic chemicals more harmful than electromagnetic radiation?
Electromagnetism is more complex and more fundamental than chemistry.
Electromagnetism shapes the sun and stars. Electromagnetism animates life.
Electromagnetism is behind chemistry. There is no “chemical force” in the universe.
Outside of atomic nuclei, there is only gravity and electromagnetism.
Electromagnetism guides everything we see, including ourselves. Chemistry is an
effect, not a cause.
Can’t we find safe frequencies? Won’t that solve the problem?
That is looking at both wireless technology and life too simplistically.
Most wireless technology has only one goal: to transmit information to computers,
information of great complexity and variety. It is not simple, constant radiation of
one amplitude and one frequency: such radiation would carry no information.
Instead, it is multiple large frequency bands, each divided into hundreds, thousands,
and millions of individual frequencies of all different bandwidths, overlapping and
interacting, pulsed at an enormous variety of intervals, in an enormous variety of
shapes, patterns and durations, all over the world. Even a single signal from a single
device has a variety of amplitudes, frequencies and pulsations, and is modulated in
complex ways in order to carry all the information needed to be read by a cell phone
or computer.
Life has to also carry an enormous, almost infinite complexity of information in its
nervous systems and its meridians, and to store and process this information in its
cells, organs and chakras, and in its DNA which is shared and circulated among
trillions of individuals of 50 million different species, all connected to one another
and to the earth, sky and universe in a grand circuit of energy and information.

4
The artificial cloud of energy and information is interfering with, overpowering and
destroying the natural, living circuitry of energy and information. It cannot be
otherwise.
What about LiFi? If light is safe, why not use light instead of
microwaves?
Light is a nutrient. We absorb it with our eyes, and into our blood. It is necessary for
health. It regulates our biorhythms. Green plants need it for photosynthesis. We
absorb more of the pulsations and modulation frequencies when they are carried
into our bodies by light than when they are carried into our bodies by microwaves.
LiFi is more harmful to life than WiFi.
Cell phones are much smaller than cell towers. Doesn’t that mean
they are safer? Doesn’t it mean the radiation does not travel as far?
Cell phones and cell towers emit the same radiation; size has nothing to do with it.
The main difference is that a cell tower emits as many signals simultaneously as
there are cell phones communicating with it at that time, whereas a cell phone only
emits one voice channel and one data channel. A cell tower therefore emits stronger
radiation than a cell phone, but by the time it reaches your body, its radiation is
much weaker than the radiation from a cell phone that you hold in your hand, near
your body. And a cell phone emits signals that a cell tower does not: Bluetooth, WiFi,
GPS and other signals.
The radiation from a cell phone travels just as far as the radiation from a cell tower.
The radiation from a cell phone will reach all people, animals, birds, insects and
plants in line of sight with it, no matter how far away. It will reach a cell tower 90
miles away. It will reach a satellite 22,300 miles away. It will reach Mars 200 million
miles away. With 15 billion mobile devices on the Earth, we are polluting not just our
homes, our neighborhoods and our planet, but the entire solar system.
My cell phone does not make me sick. Why should I stop using it?
Your cell phone is damaging your health whether you are aware of it or not. It is
damaging your blood–brain barrier — the barrier that keeps bacteria, viruses and
toxic chemicals out of your brain tissue; the barrier that maintains the inside of your
head at a constant pressure, preventing you from having a stroke. Since brain tissue

5
has no pain receptors, plenty of damage can occur without pain. Instead, it will cause
memory loss, difficulty concentrating, anxiety, depression, sleep disorders and so
forth. In rats, damage to the blood–brain barrier can be detected after just a two–
minute exposure to a cell phone. After a two–hour exposure the damage is
permanent. There is no reason for it to be different in humans.
The radiation from your cell phone is also slowing your metabolism — your ability to
digest sugars, fats and proteins. This causes either obesity or weight loss, depending
on your genetic makeup. It also causes diabetes, heart disease and cancer. Wireless
technology is the cause of more obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer than any
other factor.
The people who are aware of the damage in real time are the people who can feel it
in their nervous system or their heart. That is maybe one–third of the population. It
feels to them like they are being electrocuted. And they are, but so is everyone else.
The few who have heard of such a thing call themselves “electrosensitive.” Those
who have not heard of it think they are suffering from anxiety, or that they have a
neurological or cardiac disorder.
Isn’t a flip phone safer than a smartphone?
Both are digital and both emit pulsed, modulated microwave radiation. And despite
what many people think, flip phones can emit as much radiation, or more, than
smartphones. But safety is not determined by power level. Damage to the blood–
brain barrier is greatest at the lowest power level, at least in laboratory rats. The
bandwidth is more important than power level. Smartphones use more bandwidth
than flip phones.
The bottom line is that cell phones have been killing people since they were
invented. In each city in the United States where 2G “flip phone” service was turned
on for the first time in 1996 or 1997, mortality rose immediately, on the day it was
turned on in each city. And the overall health of the population was damaged
permanently. At least ten thousand Americans died from the radiation within three
months after 2G “flip phone” service was turned on in various cities in 1996 and
1997. Whether more people died from their new phones or from the new cell towers
is impossible to know: the radiation comes from both.

6
Isn’t a cell phone safe to use as long as you hold it away from your
head?
About 20 years ago someone started promoting the idea of the “near field plume”
which was supposed to extend out six inches from a cell phone, and that if you held
your phone more than six inches from your head, you were safe. That is a complete
fiction. There is no such thing as a near field “plume.” It does not exist.
The region very near to a source of radiation, where the electric field and the
magnetic field are separate and complex, is called the near field. The space very far
from the source, where the electric and magnetic fields are tied together and
diminish with distance, is called the far field. The near and far fields blend into one
another. There is no dividing line where one stops and the other begins. And it is
certainly not true that the radiation stops at six inches. If that were true, the
radiation would never reach a cell tower and the phone would not work. And if it
were true of a cell phone, it would also be true of a cell tower, which emits the same
radiation. Then a cell tower would be safe if you stood more than six inches away
from one. How absurd!
And your body is a conductor, so if you are holding the phone in your hand, no
matter how far away from your head, the microwaves are conducted into your hand
and throughout your body, and your arm is an extension of the phone and is part of
the radiating antenna.
If you put the phone on a table in front of you and do not hold it, then the
microwaves are just irradiating you and not being conducted into you. But since for
some types of harm, for example damage to the blood–brain barrier, the damage
increases with distance, that does not protect you either.
If the radiation levels from cell phones and cell towers were reduced,
wouldn’t that make them safe?
No. It is the informational content, not power level, that causes the harm. A cell
phone exposes the brain to microwave radiation at roughly 10 milliwatts per square
centimeter. At power levels one trillion times lower than that, microwave radiation
has been shown to affect ovulation, the immune system, plant growth, human brain
waves, and the structure of DNA.

7
Don’t we need more studies before we know if microwaves are
dangerous?
No. We already had 10,000 studies by 1980. Today we have at least 30,000 studies.
There are more studies showing harm from microwaves and radio frequency
radiation than from any other pollutants except tobacco smoke and mercury.
How long has this been going on? How long have we known that
wireless technology is harmful?
For as long as wireless technology has been around. At Marconi’s first public
demonstration of radio in Salisbury Plain in 1896, spectators described various nerve
sensations they experienced. When Marconi turned on the first French radio station
in Wimereux, one man who lived nearby “burst in with a revolver” because the
waves were causing him sharp internal pains. On the evening of January 22, 1901,
when Marconi fired up a new, more powerful transmitter on the Isle of Wight,
Queen Victoria, in residence on the island, had a stroke and died. Within a few years,
90 percent of the bees on the island had disappeared. Marconi himself suffered from
recurring fevers from the time he began experimenting with radio and for the rest of
his life. He suffered nine heart attacks, the last one killing him at age 63. Even prior
to Marconi, in the early 1890s, Jacques–Arsène d’Arsonval published the results of
experiments on humans and animals showing that high frequencies affect blood
pressure and profoundly alter metabolism.
Do telecommunications company officials know their products are
harmful? Are they doing this to us deliberately?
They all use cell phones like the rest of the world and are as much in denial about
them as everyone else. The denial, which runs deep in society, goes back to the
beginning of the development of electricity in the 1700s.
I keep my phone off except in emergencies. Doesn’t that protect me
and others?
A cell phone leaks radiation from all of its resonant circuitry, even if it is turned off,
as long as the battery is in it. So does a modem or router that has WiFi, as long as it is
plugged in. I have measured radiation coming out of modems in which the WiFi was

8
disabled. I can always tell when someone is carrying a cell phone because I can feel
the radiation, even if it is turned off and hidden in their pocket, even from across a
room. I have never been wrong.
For whatever reason you have a cell phone — any kind of cell phone — all of the
world’s cell towers have to be there in order for it to work when you want it to. No
matter how rarely you use the phone, all the cell towers have to be there. If you use
it “only in emergencies,” that is even worse, because you are likely to be using it in
remote places where there are no cell towers and service is not good. Every call you
make from a location where there are no towers is recorded as a request for service,
and your provider will eventually put up a cell tower there in response to those calls.
When I am at home I use my cell phone connected by an ethernet
cord to a modem. Doesn’t that protect me?
It does not protect you because it is still emitting radiation. It does not protect others
because when you are not at home you need all the cell towers to be there and you
are irradiating everyone around you simply by carrying the phone around.
There are no landlines available where I live. I need my cell phone.
Unless people get rid of their cell phones, there will soon be no landlines left
anywhere. The existence of landlines depends on demand. The existence of cell
phones depends on demand. No one is doing this to us. We are doing it to ourselves.
Is fiber the solution?
Fiber enables 5G. 5G antennas are connected to each other and to the Internet by
fiber optic cables. Wireless companies are spending hundreds of billions of dollars
laying fiber all over the world for 5G. When a fiber company or a city lays fiber optic
cables, wireless companies pay for the right to use it. After the fiber is laid, they stick
antennas into it and broadcast 5G.
How is 5G different from 4G?
5G can use much higher frequencies (millimeter waves). But the biggest difference is
that 5G towers and 5G mobile devices aim narrowly focused beams at each other
instead of sending the radiation in all directions. If you are holding a 5G phone in

9
your hand, the nearest 5G tower is tracking you and aiming a beam of radiation
directly at your body. This is called phased array technology and it results in greater
penetration of the radiation into your body, even at millimeter wave frequencies,
than previous wireless technologies. 5G towers also send radiation in all directions
because they are constantly scanning the environment looking for devices to connect
with.
Is 5G a weapon?
No. 5G can use millimeter waves. There are also crowd–control weapons that use
millimeter waves. But the weapons are a thousand times more powerful and they
are not modulated and carry no information. They are different technologies that
were developed by different people for different purposes.
Are there devices that can protect us from these frequencies?
There are many companies today that prey on the gullibility of people who are
desperate to protect themselves from an assault that is coming from everywhere.
They sell “protective” chips to put on your cell phone or computer, pendants and
bracelets that will “neutralize” or “harmonize” the radiation, devices to plug into
your wall that will “protect” an area hundreds or thousands of square feet around
your house. Some advertise that they are “quantum” devices, or are based on
“scalar” technology or “torsion” fields, which are sexy words that sound scientific but
mean nothing. You cannot “neutralize” or “harmonize” radiation. These devices,
without exception, are ineffective and most will harm you.
Many of these devices emit a 7.83 Hz signal which is supposed to duplicate the first
Schumann resonance of the Earth. These are point sources that cannot duplicate a
natural frequency that bathes us from all sides. They make some people feel good
for a couple of weeks, and they can be addictive, just like the frequencies from a cell
phone or computer can be addictive, but they will harm you.
What are the alternatives?
The alternative is wires. Wired phones. Wired computers. There is no need to
reinvent the wheel, wires are what we had before wireless and are superior in every
way. Wires carry the same voices, but clearer. The same information, but more
securely. And the information is contained in the wires, instead of being broadcast all

10
over the earth in a cloud of radiation. Wireless is convenient, but for the sake of
convenience we are killing ourselves in real time and destroying our planet.
Recommended reading: The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
Especially:
Chapter 8, “Mystery on the Isle of Wight”
Chapter 9, “Earth’s Electric Envelope”
Chapter 11, “Irritable Heart”
Chapter 12, “The Transformation of Diabetes”
Chapter 13, “Cancer and the Starvation of Life”
Chapter 16, “Bees, Birds, Trees, and Humans”
Arthur Firstenberg
Author, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life
Administrator, International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/press...g-rollout/

https://i0.wp.com/childrenshealthdefense...C261&ssl=1

CHD Points Out Potential Human Health Risks From 5G Rollout

Washington, DC, Jan. 24, 2022 — Last week, several international airlines cancelled flights to the U.S. following Verizon’s and AT&T’s rollout of 5G. Dubai’s Emirates Airlines suspended flights to major cities including Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Miami, Newark, Orlando, San Francisco and Seattle. In a CNN interview, the president of Emirates Airlines stated that the deployment of 5G is “one of the most delinquent, utterly irresponsible issue, subjects, call it what you like, I’ve seen in my aviation career.” He went on to say, “Somebody should have told them a long time ago that it would compromise safety of operation of aircraft in metropolitan areas with catastrophic consequences if this was allowed to continue.” Other airlines including Air India, ANA and Japan Airlines also cancelled flights to some U.S. cities citing similar concerns.

A statement issued last Thursday by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) states, “The FAA is working diligently to determine which altimeters are reliable and accurate where 5G is deployed in the United States.” The agency also says it anticipates some altimeters will be “too susceptible to 5G interference.” For safety reasons, aircraft with altimeters that fall into that category won’t be allowed to make low visibility landings in areas where 5G is deployed as inaccurate information may be transmitted.

“The fact that airlines outside the US are aghast at our policies signals that their countries made plans for this 5G inevitability,” said Children’s Health Defense president and general counsel Mary Holland. “Just like the pharmaceutical, banking, and food additive industries, the US government’s regulations have put profits over people’s health, turning a blind eye to the obvious threats.”

Experts explain that 5G is fundamentally different from all the previous generations of mobile network technologies. While 4G networks use frequencies up to the mid-band (1-6 GHz), the 5G network uses frequencies up to the high-band (24-48 GHz) of the electromagnetic (EM), specifically, the radiofrequency (RF) spectrum. “This order of magnitude increase is likely to have catastrophic consequences on human health, including to children and other vulnerable populations,” said Holland.

Over 1500 peer-reviewed scientific papers demonstrate biological and health impacts from exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs). The International EMF Scientist Appeal states, “Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines.” The group also lists effects from exposure including increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. “Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life,” according to the organization. Additionally, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO IARC) has classified RF EMFs as possibly carcinogenic to humans.

In August, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of Children’s Health Defense (CHD) in its landmark case against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), challenging the FCC’s decision not to review its health and safety guidelines regarding 5G and wireless technology. The court ruled that the FCC failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its current guidelines adequately protect against harmful effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation and failed to review the extensive evidence that was filed with the FCC.

“The reaction from the airline industry to the 5G rollout begs the question, if the transmission of 5G signals from the ground can interfere with aircraft equipment at relatively large distances, posing a risk to airplane landing safety, what risks do they pose directly on the ground?” asked Holland. “What are the impacts to human health, especially to children? Until we know the answers to these questions, the American public should demand a pause to all 5G deployment while serious investigations take place.”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-crum...ic/5772011

As COVID Crumbles They’re Already Prepping the Next “Pandemic”

The coronavirus may go but, from cancer to AIDS, the mRNA vaccines are here to stay.

The Covid-19 narrative is broken, that battle is over. Yes, there are still pockets of token resistance, little embattled squares who aren’t ready to give up the ghost just yet, but for the most part the establishment are letting it go.

Country after country after country are “relaxing” their Covid restrictions, abandoning vaccine passport plans and attempting to “get back to normal”.

It seems every week some new “expert” who spent the last two years predicting we’re all gonna die turns up on the news claiming we should “treat Covid like the flu”.

But just because they’re giving slack on Covid does not mean the agenda behind Covid is gone. Far from it.

In fact, even as they seek to dump this pandemic in a shallow grave, they are already prepping the public for the next health scare – AIDs.
What’s Behind the New AIDS Scare?

In December Joe Biden claimed it was the aim of his administration to “end the HIV/AIDS epidemic by 2030”. A similar campaign, launched in the UK at the same, uses the same exact phrase, word for word.

Then, just last week it was suddenly reported there was a “new variant” of HIV circulating in Europe, this new strain is allegedly “more virulent”,“more transmissible”, and “progresses to AIDS faster”.

At the same time, papers are reporting that for the first time in years heterosexuals are more likely to contract HIV than homosexuals, and they are “more at risk of AIDS” because they’re “diagnosed late”.

On the back of this “news”, a Guardian opinion piece claims we need a “new strategy” for dealing with AIDS.

Following hot on the heels of this fresh wave of fear is a push for everyone to get AIDS tested as soon as possible, from politicians and celebrities and everyone in between.

Prince Harry is leading the charge, in a video that caused the press invoke the spirit of his mother Princess Diana, Harry insisted we all have a “duty” to get HIV tested “to keep other people safe”, comparing it to the COVID outbreak.

“Know your status“, the video says. Which will probably be a hashtag in the near future. (I just checked, and it actually is already.)

They’re really cranking through the gears on this one.

Even while the problem and reaction are still barely out of the research and development stage, they’re already talking about the solution.

Guess what it is?

If you said “another mRNA vaccine”, well done for paying attention

Yes, Moderna has apparently learned so much from making their rushed Covid vaccine which doesn’t work that they’re already making an HIV vaccine they hope will be just as “safe and effective”.

In a truly startling coincidence, Moderna’s HIV vaccine began clinical trials the exact same day the “new variant” of HIV hit the headlines, and the same week as the NHS’s annual “HIV Testing Week”. Funny old world, isn’t it?

Anyway, everyone get ready to line up for the AIDS shot.

Oh, and the cancer one as well.

The Covid battle might be slowly winding down, but the mRNA “vaccine” war has potentially only just begun.

Clif High – THE VAXXXED ARE GOING TO GO BALLISTIC

https://www.bitchute.com/video/dg9i2XWB1Jxk
Reply

#3
V for Victory:
I have heard some people say that one of the biggest side effects of the jabs are the removal or stunting of people’s souls. I have had my suspicions in the past but today I truly saw evidence firsthand of the beginnings of this. I won’t talk here about the specifics of what happened but today I witnessed a family member, jabbed, show no compassion and be completely in denial of something they were clearly in the wrong about. I have noticed, for the past 6 months or more, how uncaring and almost zombie-like she has become. So different than how she used to be.

I have also noticed another family member that has also become zombie-like and even has “brain fart” moments where he can’t remember what everyday objects are called like a bicycle. And I’m talking about a smart, ex-teacher.

I’m starting to come to a conclusion on how many of the jabbed that survive might end up. 1) It will be hard for them to feel empathy or compassion. 2) They will live in a constant state of denial where they will not be able to accept anything that they do not already believe. These being the two major ones from what will probably end up being a long list.

So in essence, they will become “the Borg”.

https://media.gab.com/system/accounts/av...it_med.jpg

Montalk:
@guanajo Before the jab came out, cognitive changes were being reported in up to 25% of people with Covid.

For example: "The changes in the COVID-19 brains showed signatures of inflammation, abnormal nerve cell communication, and chronic neurodegeneration."

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20210628...rain-study

And from a page on common symptoms of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

https://www.brainline.org/article/tbi-10...l-symptoms

- Verbal outbursts
- Physical outbursts
- Poor judgment and disinhibition
- Impulsive behavior
- Negativity
- Intolerance
- Apathy
- Egocentricity
- Rigidity and inflexibility
- Risky behavior
- Lack of empathy
- Lack of motivation or initiative
- Depression or anxiety

Looks to me like the jabs (or at least certain batches) were continuing what Covid started, as if both were designed by the same people, towards the same ends of zombifying the human race.

Brain injury, even "just" through inflammation and/or oxidative damage, can lead to feelings of having lost one's mojo, spark, or soul. People with that issue should treat it like TBI or Alzheimer's and look into diet, lifestyle, and supplements that support recovery.

5G could be another prong of the same pitchfork. I know some say COVID is a hoax and it's all 5G but outbreaks included cities that didn't have 5G yet, and in the U.S. true 5G wasn't widely up and running in 2020.

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20210628...rain-study

More Proof COVID Severely Affects the Brain
By Megan Brooks

The most comprehensive molecular study to date of brain tissue from people who died of COVID-19 provides clear evidence that SARS-CoV-2 causes profound molecular changes in the brain, despite no molecular trace of the virus in brain tissue.

"The signature the virus leaves in the brain speaks of strong inflammation and disrupted brain circuits and resembles signatures the field has observed in Alzheimer's or other neurodegenerative diseases," senior author Tony Wyss-Coray, PhD, professor of neurology and neurological sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, told Medscape Medical News.

The study was published online June 21 in Nature.
Signs of Distress

"We know that up to a third of SARS-CoV-2-infected people show brain symptoms including brain fog, memory problems, and fatigue, and a growing number of people have such symptoms long after they seemingly recovered from virus infection," said Wyss-Coray.

"However, we have very little understanding of how the virus causes these symptoms and what its effects are on the brain at a molecular level," he added.

Using single-cell RNA sequencing, the researchers studied brain tissue samples from eight patients who died of COVID-19 and 14 controls who died of other causes.

While there was no molecular evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in brain tissue samples from the patients who died of COVID-19, "we were very surprised to learn that no matter which type of cell we studied (different types of nerve cells, immune cells, or different support cells in the brain) there were prominent changes" compared with brain tissue samples from controls who died of other causes, said Wyss-Coray.

The changes in the COVID-19 brains showed signatures of inflammation, abnormal nerve cell communication, and chronic neurodegeneration.

"Across cell types, COVID-19 perturbations overlap with those in chronic brain disorders and reside in genetic variants associated with cognition, schizophrenia, and depression," the researchers report.

"Viral infection appears to trigger inflammatory responses throughout the body that may cause inflammatory signaling across the blood–brain barrier, which in turn could 'trip off' neuroinflammation in the brain," Wyss-Coray said.

The findings may help explain the brain fog, fatigue, and other neurological and psychiatric symptoms of long COVID.

"While we studied only brains from people who died of COVID-19, we believe it is likely that similar, but hopefully weaker, signs of inflammation and chronic neurodegeneration will be found in COVID-19 survivors, especially those with chronic brain symptoms," Wyss-Coray said.

Darrell R:
@montalk @guanajo Hey Tom how are you...here are a couple of things I found to be of interest

https://www.thebernician.net/the-decepti...tagious-2/

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1flLPks1...EyOVa/view

http://entityart.co.uk/the-germ-theory-d...ronavirus/

https://drive.google.com/file/d/13D13AXO...tOcLR/view

V for Victory:
@montalk Thanks for the info. I've been wondering if it's possible that most of the people that got really, really sick were the ones that actually got the real Covid bio-weapon from Wuhan and the rest that "tested positive for Covid" but their symptoms were no more worse than a bad flu, actually just had Influenza.

13laddyboy13:
@montalk @guanajo I will argue that all these "covid side-effects" are due in large part to the social isolation and the fear people were exposed to. I have experienced a lot of the same feelings both before and after this "pandemic" and I find it completely natural as a result of "waking up" in a "They Live"-type world. People have been consistently more and more isolated through devices and the internet for the last 15 years, and the irrationality of people's actions has only become worse. The real diabolical part of it is making people crave worlds of their own creation instead of the shared ones fostered through deep and genuine connection in person with one another.

Most people's realities are stitched together and facilitated through screens and technology, including the discussions had on Tom's channel, though people commenting here all appear to have well above average ability for self reflection so this serves as a deterrent to getting sucked into the simulated nature of digital communication.

When the connection to "self" is severed, many more features of an "ungrounded" state become possible. People can in fact become part of "The Borg".

The human mind is so adaptive and so complex (even the "normies") that many variables are worth considering when it comes to determining the reasoning for the irrational expressions of those minds.

All that said, I do hope humans are able to find the answers to just what "sars cov 2" actually is and what the jabs actually do to the body. The data and stories of the genesis of both continues to be obfuscated to great degree. Talk about poisoning data... sheesh. Thanks for the conversation.

V for Victory:
@13laddyboy13 @montalk All very good points and something that I have considered as we have all been going through, IMO, an MKUltra process especially the past 2 years. It really could be a combination of all of these things and I have to keep that possibility within the equation. Yet there is a splinter in my mind that even though this global-scale MKUltra process has affected us all, in my personal experience, the people that have not been jabbed seem to be fairing "better" than the ones that have been. Generally speaking. Just something I'm keeping in mind.

13laddyboy13:
@guanajo @montalk I agree for sure... Though, I think people who would willingly take the jab without looking into it more deeply and asking questions were already "borg-ready" in the first place.

Does that jab make someone "borg-ready" or is someone "borg-ready" and blindly takes the jab? Chicken or egg? Both?

I tend to default to giving the human mind (I define mind as the amalgamation of the body, the thoughts, feelings, emotions, and the "spirit") a lot more credit than it typically receives. I think one of the reasons humans seek to externally define aspects of consciousness is because it cannot stay within the infinite field of awareness and process all the "data" it receives in real time while keeping its own sense of "self" or "I-ness" intact and integrating into it all. This, to me, is where people came up with the stupid idea to "assassinate" the ego, as if the ego is the enemy of.... itself?

Much of this entire experienced reality, I feel, stems from the friction created through "I-ness" and "Infinite awareness" or "God". So much creativity comes out of that and it is so fulfilling for an individual to reside in such a "realm"... If these aspects are well-integrated and functioning freely I would call this a "Self-realized" mind.

This is, to me, the True miracle of the human experience, and something the "keepers of this reality" seek to keep people from at all costs. So, they created the synthetic overlay that tricks so many people, and inspires others who are allergic to it, to go deeper... My point, the mind is so amazingly capable, that I don't think any technology could be invented that would just overcome and control that out of the gate. A mind would have to be softened up over a long period of time in order to accept the latest intervention of "upgrade" as genuine and beneficial - wait... a.... minute...

V for Victory:
@13laddyboy13 @montalk Agreed. The mind, as you describe it, is a very powerful tool. Yet a powerful tool is useless if it is not properly integrated and used, or used at all in many people's case. The choice to put it to good use, makes a world of a difference. Maybe the choice itself of people taking the jab is "warp speeding" the process of becoming "the Borg" moreso than what the jabs contain. Who knows. Regardless of the reasons, I can clearly see the "warp sped" decline of humanity. The sincere self-work that you mentioned will be imperative in order to prevent as much as possible being dragged down by "the Borg".

AbducteeJournal:
@montalk @guanajo This explains part of why the heavy censorship of jab side effects because it’s so similar to COVID symptoms. But considering there was no standardization of spike protein amount being made in the body after injection, the severity of COVID-like symptoms couldn’t be predicted. Until of course mass injections but not recording side effects, as well as heavy censorship, is part of the plan of hiding the differences between natural infection and injected infection.

As in people who would have otherwise been spared in a natural infection and gained strong natural immunity were unfortunately not spared with the injected infection. Longer we wait the more stories I hear of people dying from the jab, already two people connected to my coworkers have died post injection, one being a 42 year old man (heart related). Adding boosters increases their chances of a severe reaction as well as cumulative damage.

What’s been more disappointing though is seeing people who intimately understand molecular biology and understand the importance of long term studies lining up for the jab. I’m just beyond perplexed. First day in the lab I got into a convo with my PI and we were sharing stories about Covid side effects and jab side effects and at the end I was like “if there are similarities doesn’t that suggest the spike protein is an active toxin?”. He had no answer. Hopefully he has thought about it some more and isn’t lining up for more shots.

V for Victory:
@abducteejournal @montalk “The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow-witted man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid before him.” - Leo Tolstoy

AbducteeJournal:
@guanajo @montalk great quote! Pretty sure he isn’t doing boosters, his wife didn’t even get one shot. Half the problem is that people, even scientifically well educated people, trusted big pharma, medical establishment, MSM, and government too much. So rather than falling back on their own education and taking the time to research, or at the very least wait, they succumbed to the fear porn. So although I don’t perceive every person who took the shot as an idiot, I do perceive every person who took the shot as highly gullible.

V for Victory:
@abducteejournal "even scientifically well educated people, trusted big pharma, medical establishment, MSM, and government too much." That truly is how the system has been designed. I worked at the University of South Florida's Internal Medicine department for just over a year just doing misc admin work and in just a short amount of time, I saw how it truly works as a cult. You think how your superiors think and do what your superiors say if you don't want all of those years of school work and internship and tests to go down the drain. And of course, those superiors do what pharma says and up and up the ladder it goes. The medical system is one of the most close-minded and corrupt industries in the world. And now people get to see it first-hand in all it's glory. Who knows, maybe the whole thing was designed like that so that it would culminate with Covid and the jabs. This after all seems to be the end game. At least when it comes to the current medical system.

AbducteeJournal:
@guanajo Yes! That! Exactly! I’m not afraid to lose my job (since I don’t have much financial obligations tying me down) so I can push back on that system but one of the reasons both my PI and lab manager got the shot was because they were afraid to lose their job. That was early on though, prior to DeSantis making it illegal to mandate, so they could have still avoided it if they stuck to their guns.

AbducteeJournal:
@montalk @guanajo Also you think 5G could just amplify the effects of the infection? Maybe it isn’t necessarily directly related to the Covid infection but could place undue stress on the body that causes a more severe reaction. Or otherwise amplify a preexisting condition, which might explain why people had so many differences in symptoms and then hospitals were incentivized to put down Covid as the culprit. One thing to look into maybe is show where towers were built, when 5G implemented, then compare that to Covid stats. Granted those stats aren’t wholly reliable.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Hissil's post:
  • Richard
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.