King Tut was mostly a West European

[iqhunk]

http://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts...-european/

Genuine research or deliberate disinfo to connect Ancient Egypt to the Holy Roman Empire/House of David etc  etc ?

[Sariel]

http://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts...-european/

Genuine research or deliberate disinfo to connect Ancient Egypt to the Holy Roman Empire/House of David etc  etc ?

In the Masonic circles it's generaly believed that King Tut was a son of Akhenaten and his lesser wife Kiya or better known as Miriam. Miriam was half-sister to Akhenaten and she was important because of her Mitanni genetic heritage. Mittani had their empire and as ancestors of early original Sumerians are very important  in so called the Illuminati.

However, new genetical and archeological research prove that the real mother of king Tut was Akhenaten full sister who was also his wife. She is known as the Young Lady. King Pharaoh Akhenaten's grandfather was Yuya the Vizier, a white Aryan of unknown but Israelite/Hebrew origins. Also they are descendants of Sum-Aryan Hyksos who ruled Egypt. Hyksos means Sun-Worshippers.

So, it's true that King Tut was European and that he is linked to the House of David, another king of the ancient Hyksos people who are identical with Amorites and Hittites and Kassites. Also a branch of those people ruled with ancient India, where they are known as Brahmins, and also the name of India comes from Indra, one of the names for their's gods.

On the interesting notes, my own sister is named Miriam, and she posses Mitannian  genetic heritage.  ;)

[senqua]

http://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts...-european/

Genuine research or deliberate disinfo to connect Ancient Egypt to the Holy Roman Empire/House of David etc  etc ?

In the Masonic circles it's generaly believed that King Tut was a son of Akhenaten and his lesser wife Kiya or better known as Miriam. Miriam was half-sister to Akhenaten and she was important because of her Mitanni genetic heritage. Mittani had their empire and as ancestors of early original Sumerians are very important  in so called the Illuminati.

However, new genetical and archeological research prove that the real mother of king Tut was Akhenaten full sister who was also his wife. She is known as the Young Lady. King Pharaoh Akhenaten's grandfather was Yuya the Vizier, a white Aryan of unknown but Israelite/Hebrew origins. Also they are descendants of Sum-Aryan Hyksos who ruled Egypt. Hyksos means Sun-Worshippers.

So, it's true that King Tut was European and that he is linked to the House of David, another king of the ancient Hyksos people who are identical with Amorites and Hittites and Kassites. Also a branch of those people ruled with ancient India, where they are known as Brahmins, and also the name of India comes from Indra, one of the names for their's gods.

On the interesting notes, my own sister is named Miriam, and she posses Mitannian  genetic heritage.  ;)

The founders / ruling elite of egypt were based on Atlantian leftovers , no ?

[iqhunk]

This is where i miss Avatar and Matthew Deagle on the forum, these guys had mapped out every historical geneology from Atlantis.

[Sariel]

The founders / ruling elite of egypt were based on Atlantian leftovers , no ?

That is partially true and wrong.

True is that the Egyptian civilisation was developed around 10 000 BC when the first settlers, the Atlanteans, inhabited region and built pyramids. However, few milleniums latter Egypt merely was a desert unorganised in local tribes with kind of bedouin type of population.

The second development of Egyptian culture happen with coming  of Sum-Aryans around 3000 B.C.  The first pharaohs of Egypt are Sum-Aryan kings. Most famous of them Sargon the Great. Sargon in Akkadian means Sagara or Scorpio, the Scorpion king. His son is known as Menes, but also as Menus of Crete. The Grand-son of Sargon was known in Egypt as Narmer which is Sumerian for Naram-Suen or Naram-Sin. And who proclaimed himself the King of Four Quarters, later synonym with the Pindar.

After those first Dynasties Egypt will gradually enter into stagnation, and then happened another emigration of those Sum-Aryans. They would inhabit the present day of Israel, and gradually enter into Egyptian lands. With mixture of war and diplomacy they eventually installed their own dynasty and to us they are known as Hyksos.

Though, the official history teach us that the Hyksos were expelled, the truth is that they had stood behind both the 17th, the 18th and the 19th dynasties of Egypt which are also the most powerful ones and the pinnacle of Egyptian power and dominance.
It's timeline within historical Bible and the Moses, but too complicated for this topic.

The third emigration related to the famous fall of the Troy which is a Hittite town in Anatolia/Arsawa and also brother like nation to Dorians, variation of the name Aryan, of people who had invaded Greece. Alexander the Macedonian, who conquered India, is from this bloodline.

So, this third emigration known as the sea people finally destroyed Egypt. Those sea people will later came into Europe through the present Romania, where they are known as Thracians, Cimbrians, Teutons, and eventually Normans, Scandinavian, Vikings.


The central India is based primarly on Reptilian religious and political systems and castes, being a Dravidian colony and center. Sum-Aryans prefered to rule those theritories through tributes.
Particularly the architecture resembles those structures which could be found on the planetary systems inhabited by the Draco race.
During my education I did done few studies about India, and I am quite very well accustomed with this particular culture.