Meet The New “Legitimate” King of England?

[William]

Those of you in Australia, Have you noticed any cleaning out of and underGrnd Bases? I heard that there was a time in ausie, that
bombs where going off for hours. Is this true or nonsense? bombs were supposedly taking out the dumbs.

What is really going on in Australia in your parts.

[Pheonix]

Rick,

From about 5 years ago, maybe a little more, up until less than a year ago I would feel the ground in my house tremble momentarily and always put it down to a slight earth tremor.  Keeping in mind that I was almost an HOURS highway drive outside of the Melbourne CBD, both east of it, and west of it, and I felt them in BOTH places.  That's all I can say about it.  It never occurred to me that it was underground bombs because I was not aware of this stuff till recent.

In July of this year a close mate of mine was traveling on the road one early night and noticed a huge amount of cop cars and ambulances had all driven onto open land that adjoined the Melton golf course.  He was passing by there on his way to the on-ramp of the Melton highway to return home to the other side of the Bay.  When he told me about it I immediately pointed it out to him that it may have been kids getting rescued there underground and he suddenly realized that I may have been right about it.  Strange how it didn't occur to him at he time given that I have regularly linked him to many pages about the situation.   I tell you though... I really would like to SEE the kids.  Another disturbing thing that he told me is that he saw a small stick on sign there at a shop from he local Football club, and guess what the pricks have named the club?  The Melton BLOODS.   Check it up on the net, I did when he told me and it's true.  I smell FOUL play Rick.

William,

I tried to point that out when we first started posting about him.  I regularly get aussies asking about him and what I think.  Attached is a quick reply to an Aussie who asked me about him on bitchute, I'm the user titled "YOU".  A pity people just don't get it, I've seen them come and go more often than you'd believe.  Once I even had a guy who was apparently the true heir to the throne of the King of Ireland since the mid 1600s.  HE came over my house a couple of times and got me to write up a few legal instruments for him which he used to make his claim here IN LAW.  His claim was NOT rebutted by anyone, so it stands.  But so what?  I bet you I could make a claim as being the lost heir of the Kleong or Romulan Empire and no one would rebutt that either.  STATEMENTS or DECLARATIONS OF CLAIM do NOT maketh the King, only his loyal subjects do, and that, irrespective of any form of birthright.  I wish these clowns would come to grips with that.  You can refer to me as "Your Grace' if you wish.



   







.

[William]

Good info, thanks Pheonix

[Pheonix]

YW William, to add to it...

It's the same thing with a nation's Constitution; no difference.  It only has the force and effect that is conveyed to it by its subjects as well.  If the people won't back it, it's as GW Bush said, "... just a piece of paper."   In effect, a President or Prime Minister is simply a corporate or commercial office which in time replaced the organic office of King or Queen.   We cannot mix an organic "living" element with a "fictitious" element, a corpse.  The latter is a legal construct which can only take on full force and effect "at" law when "Sponsors" come forth and breath life into it, which is done by the conveying of the living's "will and intent" to sponsor it with life force.  The former is almost the same, only it gains more power because the force it is given by the people's (the sponsor's) will and intent is backed by their primary allegiance to the laws and principles of the Almighty creator, instead of a man's laws, also commonly known as either codes OR the color of law.  The color of law being "mere semblance of legal right", which is the "pretense or appearance of" right; get it?  Hence, an action done under color of law adjusts (colors) "the law" to the circumstance, yet said apparent legal action contravenes "the law", as "in law" not at law.  Which is why all the current legal fraternity of law is said to "practice" law, instead of applying or counseling in accordance with "the law" (not the color thereof whose hue is subjectively applied by its practitioner).  Amongst other things, that also minimizes their liability as well because under the doctrine of a "mistake of fact", they can lawfully and legally retract from their initial standing whilst remaining in honor.  So long as they then provide an alternative deemed sufficiently honorable, then they are not liable for their initial mistake.


This is why man has veered towards the subjectivity of codes rather than adhering with the stringent objectivity of the creator's law... which btw the latter have been formed on the basis of love; equity.  Which is why the word love does not exist in any book of statutory codes, it cannot given the magnitude of its subjectivity in covering a far wider scope of circumstance in any given subject-matter.  'In law', is almost all objective, at law is almost all subjective.  It's the mirroring of 'the law' into another hue thereof.  I could write a book on this topic, outlining the hidden and unhidden machinations of law which no one in the history of mankind has ever done so.  I can do that with any subject that I enjoy, not just law. With humility I say; one is either born with eyes that can see what others cannot, or they're not, but there must exist a certain level of inquisitiveness for it to work, without that required level of love in a subject, no effort can be made to see with that level of depth, if you get what I mean William.  See, the only thing that can become WRONG with the color of law, is the intent of its practitioners, nothing more. lol  

[Pheonix]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/CsVjWnvgQ7hS/

[mzacharias]

My uncle used to say that : "the law is an ass".

I do not pretend to know anything about who this person professing a royal bloodline is, but you can bet your bottom dollar that Arthur Uther Pendragon will have something to say about it. He is the true ruler of Briton, don't you know...

We Neo-Druids do have to put up with some nonsense.

And before you begin, Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor was derobed in 2006.
Please note also that the position was only ever an honorary one.
I dislike such unmerited statuses.

I very much enjoy reading you, Pheonix, perhaps you ~should~ write a book!