Real Alien Confession ! Future Warning !

[AndrewX]

I couldn't help but think that this was NOT a hoax.  I had all my sensors up trying to detect a hoax when viewing this, but not 1 'hoax' bell went off in my mind.  See for yourself, but I think this is the real thing.:paranoid:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1n3gTmHy...re=related

 

[Get Boldened]

He should not have used a blue filter. That immediately discredits his message. However, I agree his message came through very clearly.

[Richard]

I think it’s a hoax. For one thing he speaks English too well. You can tell he has spoken English all his life. The other thing is all the references to the lord. You can tell he has Christian beliefs.

[DreamTime]

I think that the guy was a fake, but while watching him, I found this link. Now this is really interesting. What do you all think about this? This was from the Art Bell Show:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oda2qm0We...re=related

[AndrewX]

Very interesting about the blue filter GB, but I would have thought that if a Blue filter was applied to the full spectrum of light that we would NOT see any blue light at all... as it is the color being filtered.  Or perhaps your definition of 'it' differs to common lighting terminology. (???)  But I understand what you mean. 

Rick,

Does this imply that alliens who have not spent many years on Earth cannot have a good grasp of English?  I thought their superior intellect would overcome this? 

But I see what you are all saying about it being fake.  3 of you can't all be wrong IMO.  Fake it is. 

DT,

That audio recording was freaky to say the least.  If I were to vote on it I'd say 'real'. 

BTW Rick... that strange object on the landscape of Greenland that you posted about in another thread...

... I think it is shown in alot closer detail on another video... around 1:36secs it starts on this vid: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWcIiLFIu...re=related

[Get Boldened]

AndrewX, filtering means different things for chemistry, light, and photography/film production. A sand filter blocks out sand. But a blue filter allows only blue light to pass through. It does not block blue light. The difference lies in the nature of the filter. A sand filter obviously has depositing pockets that block sand from passing through it. A light filter is a transparent lense that allows a color through while blocking out the other colors.  Another example of light filtering is a prism. In fact, a prism is a combination of filters adjacent to each other because any light that goes through it are broken into rainbow colors on the other side! Light filter is also used in photography work. I know this because in photoshop I can apply "filters." There are also "special effect filters" for filming and they are not named by what they block but what shows up. When I talked about the blue filter in the previous post, I was referring to the "special effect filter" used in producing the final video. I did not mean placing a light filter over your eyes because even thought that would show the samething as the video, it is digitally produced. I doubt he had put  a light filter over the camera lense because it would be so much easier to just edit the recording on the computer, but he could have done that. The color special effect filters in film work are intuitively named after the actual light filters. I did not have any misconception of "common light technology" terminology.

Edit: I think you will understand it much better if I explained that light filters do not block out a certain light. It allows a certain wavelength to go through, and ignores the other wavelengthes, so that's why when you look at a blue filter, you only see blue on your side. Every color shade has a wavelength which is the distance between each electromagnetic pulse. A color filter can only pick up on electromagnetic pulses that are a certain time apart.

(To explain that time and light are intertwined, light belongs to the electromagnetic spectrum and the further we are away from a planet that is emitting light, the more we look into the past of that planet. Everything we are seeing right now that are far from our galaxy is actually happening years ago because it takes light that long to reach us. Astronomers do not record information in the present. They record what they see similar stars and planets that are in different life stages and peice together the scenes to not predict but estimate what is actually happening out there in the presnt time. Light/color travels so slow that they hardly notice any changes. The Pleaidians that we see now is actually billions of years ago! If we could physically travel to the Pleaidians, what we see will not match what we observed from telescope. I digress: Even if there extraterresterials out there, we could not detect life with our telescopes because light/"present time" hasn't reached us and stars out there have already lived many many years passed our own.

The word "lightyear" describes how much light reaches us every year because we can only look into something far away from our galaxy by the amount of light that reaches us.

We can detect radio, gamma, ultraviolet, infrared, but they all belong to the electromagnetic spectrum, so we would still be looking into the past. Light in the electrogmagnetic spectrum does not travel faster than the speed of light (or Einstein's c constant). ELF or extra low frequency radio is just an example of light we cannot see because the electromagnetic pulses are either too far or too close apart in time. Radio antenna? Our radios pick up light and change it into sound. You can confirm everything I said because I took astronomy in college

Now if you ask me how the blue filter picks up on the delay of electromagnetic pulses or the specific wavelength, I'm loss for words because I'm not a physics major.).

Here's what an university say about light filters:
A blue filter is a filter that only allows blue light to pass through it. When we place a blue filter over the multicolored landscape image only the blue ...
http://solar.physics.montana.edu/YPOP/Cl...eland.html

[Richard]

Does this imply that alliens who have not spent many years on Earth cannot have a good grasp of English?  I thought their superior intellect would overcome this? 

I think aliens could learn English but it seems like you would be able to tell it wasn’t their native language. I’ve listened to lots of foreign people speak English and they don’t use the language like a person who grew up speaking English.

[Get Boldened]

Does this imply that alliens who have not spent many years on Earth cannot have a good grasp of English?  I thought their superior intellect would overcome this? 

I think aliens could learn English but it seems like you would be able to tell it wasn’t their native language. I’ve listened to lots of foreign people speak English and they don’t use the language like a person who grew up speaking English.

Aliens might be able to pick up English perfectly.

After a certain age, we stop hearing sounds as they are. It's a genetic switch. Adults cannot pick up the unique sounds of a foreign language while a child could. That's why it is best to learn how to speak at a younger age. Aliens might be able to pick up the unique sounds, but we don't know.

Edit: I learn this stuff from a linguistics course in college. While I don't feel like picking up the book to find the exact paragraph, I'm going to just quote sciencedaily.com:

Previous research showed that at birth infants can distinguish most of the phonetic contrasts used by all the world's languages. This ''universal'' capacity shifts over the first year to a language-specific pattern in which infants retain or improve categorization of native-language sounds but fail to discriminate many non-native sounds. Eventually, they learn to ignore subtle speech distinctions that their language does not use

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/200...172817.htm

Ohio State University said that children also preferred sounds:

For infants, sounds are preferred almost exclusively...

Overall, the new research showed children seem to be able to process only one type of stimuli at a time – usually sounds, but sometimes visuals. Adults, on the other hand, can process both sounds and visuals together, but prefer visual information.
http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/sounvisu.htm( Ohio State University )

If aliens have a larger brain capacity, they might still be able to pick up new sounds. The might not even have the genetic switch that causes them to prefer visual information and get lower quality of sound information.

[William]

This and he is Bunk! lol

[archangel_josh]

I just don't believe that advanced people from other planets would want to live here on this primitive Earth.....so I think he's just making it all up!

Think about it...would you want to go and live with a primitive African tribe if you're used to living at the Ritz in New York City?

-Josh