Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientists Induce Out-Of-Body Sensation
#1
By Sandra Blakeslee
NY Times

Using virtual reality goggles, a camera and a stick, scientists have induced out-of-body experiences - the sensation of drifting outside of one's own body - in healthy people, according to experiments being published in the journal Science.
 
When people gaze at an illusory image of themselves through the goggles and are prodded in just the right way with the stick, they feel as if they have left their bodies. 
 
The research reveals that "the sense of having a body, of being in a bodily self," is actually constructed from multiple sensory streams, said Matthew Botvinick, an assistant professor of neuroscience at Princeton University, an expert on body and mind who was not involved in the experiments.
 
Usually these sensory streams, which include including vision, touch, balance and the sense of where one's body is positioned in space, work together seamlessly, Prof. Botvinick said. But when the information coming from the sensory sources does not match up, when they are thrown out of synchrony, the sense of being embodied as a whole comes apart.
 
The brain, which abhors ambiguity, then forces a decision that can, as the new experiments show, involve the sense of being in a different body.
 
The research provides a physical explanation for phenomena usually ascribed to other-worldly influences, said Peter Brugger, a neurologist at University Hospital in Zurich, Switzerland. After severe and sudden injuries, people often report the sensation of floating over their body, looking down, hearing what is said, and then, just as suddenly, find themselves back inside their body.
 
The new research is a first step in figuring out exactly how the brain creates this sensation, he said.
 
The out-of-body experiments were conducted by two research groups using slightly different methods intended to expand the so-called rubber hand illusion.
 
In that illusion, people hide one hand in their lap and look at a rubber hand set on a table in front of them. As a researcher strokes the real hand and the rubber hand simultaneously with a stick, people have the vivid sense that the rubber hand is their own.
 
When the rubber hand is whacked with a hammer, people wince and sometimes cry out.
 
The illusion shows that body parts can be separated from the whole body by manipulating a mismatch between touch and vision. That is, when a person's brain sees the fake hand being stroked and feels the same sensation, the sense of being touched is misattributed to the fake.
 
The new experiments were designed to create a whole body illusion with similar manipulations.
 
In Switzerland, Dr. Olaf Blanke, a neuroscientist at the École Polytechnique Fédérale in Lausanne, Switzerland, asked people to don virtual reality goggles while standing in an empty room. A camera projected an image of each person taken from the back and displayed 6 feet away. The subjects thus saw an illusory image of themselves standing in the distance.
 
Then Dr. Blanke stroked each person's back for one minute with a stick while simultaneously projecting the image of the stick onto the illusory image of the person's body.
 
When the strokes were synchronous, people reported the sensation of being momentarily within the illusory body. When the strokes were not synchronous, the illusion did not occur.
 
In another variation, Dr. Blanke projected a "rubber body" - a cheap mannequin bought on eBay and dressed in the same clothes as the subject - into the virtual reality goggles. With synchronous strokes of the stick, people's sense of self drifted into the mannequin.
 
A separate set of experiments were carried out by Dr. Henrik Ehrsson, an assistant professor of neuroscience at the Karolinska Insitutute in Helsinki.
 
Last year, when Dr. Ehrsson was, as he says, "a bored medical student at University College London," he wondered, he said, "what would happen if you 'took' your eyes and moved them to a different part of a room? Would you see yourself where you eyes were placed? Or from where your body was placed?"
 
To find out, Dr. Ehrsson asked people to sit on a chair and wear goggles connected to two video cameras placed 6 feet behind them. The left camera projected to the left eye. The right camera projected to the right eye. As a result, people saw their own backs from the perspective of a virtual person sitting behind them.
 
Using two sticks, Dr. Ehrsson stroked each person's chest for two minutes with one stick while moving a second stick just under the camera lenses - as if it were touching the virtual body.
 
Again, when the stroking was synchronous people reported the sense of being outside their own bodies - in this case looking at themselves from a distance where their "eyes" were located.
 
Then Dr. Ehrsson grabbed a hammer. While people were experiencing the illusion, he pretended to smash the virtual body by waving the hammer just below the cameras. Immediately, the subjects registered a threat response as measured by sensors on their skin. They sweated and their pulses raced.
 
They also reacted emotionally, as if they were watching themselves get hurt, Dr. Ehrsson said.
 
People who participated in the experiments said that they felt a sense of drifting out of their bodies but not a strong sense of floating or rotating, as is common in full-blown out of body experiences, the researchers said.
 
The next set of experiments will involve decoupling not just touch and vision but other aspects of sensory embodiment, including the felt sense of the body position in space and balance, they said.
 
Such mismatches are likely to occur naturally when multi-sensory regions of the brain are deprived of oxygen after injury or shock. Or they may be induced during sleep paralysis, the exertion of extreme sports or intense meditation practices that alter blood flow to specific brain regions. 

http://www.rense.com/general78/outofbo.htm
Reply

#2
Not So Out of Body

by Greg

Stop press! 'First Out-of-body Experience Induced In Laboratory Setting'. Or, even better, 'Researchers Find an Explanation for Out-of-Body Experiences'. And so on. For more coverage, visit the always excellent Mind Hacks, which even has a link to video of researcher Olaf Blanke discussing the experiments.

It's the big news of today, with coverage everywhere from the BBC to New Scientist. But, as is usual, it's utter hype, and the headlines are completely incorrect. No explanation has been found at all, although the experiments are pretty funky and provide some interesting insights into our sense of self. However, no OBE was 'induced' - virtual reality masks and cameras were used to give a different perspective, and the scientists make this point explicitly, that they are not actually creating a true OBE. This is extremely important, as perhaps the most fascinating question of the OBE is whether the separate perspective which occurs during an OBE is a complex reconstruction by the brain, or consciousness actually perceiving from outside the body.

Further to this, there is evidence of the latter, and this research does not explain that aspect in any way. From people not recognising themselves (because they looked different to how they are used to seeing themselves, in a mirror), through to veridical perception, this is at the core of the mystery of OBEs. And to really push the boundaries, we also have to consider 'reciprocal apparitions', in which the OBE perceiver is seen by another person actually 'out of body'.

The encyclopaedic Irreducible Mind goes into some detail on these points, and actually mentions some of the earlier research done by Olaf Blanke and colleagues, with a pertinent comment:

To equate OBEs with pathological "body illusions," as Blanke et al. do, seems to us to beg the question of the nature of these experiences by ignoring the complexity of their physiological, psychological, and phenomenological aspects. In short, studies such as that of Blanke et al...have not provided anything like a complete and verified neurophysiological account of the OBE, but rather some preliminary findings and hypotheses to be pursued in further work.

Interesting how everyone is in such a rush to claim the OBE is now explained, when it is certainly not the case...it's worth a study of its own, this pathological need to explain things that don't fit the materialist paradigm.

http://www.dailygrail.com/node/5189
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.