The Bilocation of Hillary Clone-Clinton

[Richard]

by Alcuin Bramerton 

In recent months, USA Senator Hillary Clinton has been seen in two places at once on a number of different occasions. And not just in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Someone sees Hillary Clinton at a function across town at, say, 1.30pm. And then, when they compare notes with a Democratic Party co-worker later that day, they learn that Hillary was also seen back at the hotel at 1.30pm, three miles away. And her clothes were different, or her hair was different, or her makeup was different, and the people with her were different. Or, after a speaking engagement, the car drives Hillary Clinton away to Location A, where she is seen to get out of the car at, say, 10.45pm. But a co-worker sees her at 11.00pm at Location B thirty or forty miles away, except that Hillary Clinton and the car have not left Location A. And they couldn't drive that fast anyway, and Hillary's clothing or appearance is different, and the people with her are different. And the next day, arriving for an early morning meeting somewhere, Hillary comes from Location B, not from Location A. Meanwhile, she is seen having a late breakfast at Location A with different people. And so on.

How many different Hillary Clintons are there?

It is suggested that over half the USA Presidential hopefuls in 2008 are human clones. There are several of each of them. Is Hillary Clinton one of these or several of them? And how are the voters to discriminate?

A picture of the young Hillary Clinton can be seen here. Notice the physiognomy: the smile musculature, the cheek pouches, the placement of the nose bridge, the upper eyelid line. Now look at who the official Hillary for President campaign site wanted you to vote for in New Hampshire (picture here). The same woman, but older? Look at the right hand side of her mouth. Any moles visible? There are other pictures here and here and here and here. Same woman again, but older? Trick of the light maybe? Moles there notice, but no moles here. What about here? Moles or not? Now for the mystery woman. Who is this? Or this? Recognise the smile? Know the name from somewhere? The same as this perhaps? And where did this one come from? Or this, or this? In that run of pictures, there were fifteen images of which three were repeated. But how many different individuals were shown? Three? Four? When we and others first began running this story, the Hillary for President campaign immediately changed its lead picture from this to this. That image was then changed again after a bit. Their current favourite official regulation version of Hillary Clinton can now be viewed here.

And for afficionados, here is a picture of one of the Hillary Clinton clones taking instructions from a clone-handler called George McGlaris in Dover, New Hampshire, on Monday 7th January 2008.

A quote from the Hillary Clinton for President website is germane: "President Clinton writes about his life with Hillary and how she has been an agent of change for 35 years."

What is the major issue in election-alert America this year? It's the physiognomy, stupid.

The use of human clones in American political management is only now becoming apparent. The last USA President not to be cloned was John F. Kennedy. Usually, when a President or major American public figure ceases to be compliant to the demands of the controlling corporate elite, they are quietly killed, cremated and replaced with lookalike, mind-controlled clones. These days, at the Camp David human clone laboratories (Maryland) and elsewhere, it is possible to produce an adult human clone from originator DNA and matched tissue bank samples in less than 36 hours.

When President George Bush Snr left office in 1993, he was Clone Number 34 in his DNA originator line. Most of his previous 33 clones had been used and terminated at that point. When President Bill Clinton left office in 2001, he was Clone Number 21 in his line. When a President is terminated and cloned, it is standard practice to do the same with his close family members. If this is not done, they immediately notice the difference and cause difficulties.

Human clones are not ensouled and do not, therefore, have access to the higher dimensions through reflection, intuition and spiritual practice. These higher dimensional data-links which ensouled humans have, help them to appear quick, flexible and alert in conversation, particularly when stressed. The absence of this potential for minute-to-minute inspiration or revelation in clones gives rise to a simplistic body language and inappropriate physiognomic responses in complexly nuanced situations (picture example here). It also means that when faced with metaphorated questioning or elliptical comments, they can appear slow, dim or confused. Anything that human clones are confronted with which falls outside their specific day-to-day conditioning or expectation engenders childlike conflict-signalling and tantrums (picture example here). For this reason, two or three clones are kept up and running for each principal at any one time. They are very nearly identical in appearance, but some look younger or more innocent than others, and some have superficial tissue differentiations that cannot be concealed by makeup when viewed in close-up or under strong light.

If two different clones of one individual are interacted with at a conference on successive days by an ensouled human, the differences are often very evident. "Which George did you speak to today, Tony?"

Human clones are also prone to making extraordinary bloomers when speaking in public, and not noticing their mistakes. George Bush Jnr has an extensive back catalogue of such infelicities. For example, speaking on Australian television in September 2007 about the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York on the 11th September 2001, one of the Bush Jnr clones said: "And I believe those of us who live in liberty have a responsibility to promote forms of government that deal with what causes nineteen kids to get on airplanes to kill three thousand students." (See 3.44-3.55 on this YouTube video clip here)

Later in the same month, the same Bush Jnr clone was reported by CBS News as follows: “He (President George Bush Jnr) dismissed concerns about lack of political progress in Iraq, saying people there are still recovering from the brutal rule of Saddam Hussein. Then, pounding his lectern, the president said, 'I heard somebody say, "Where’s Mandela?" Well, Mandela’s dead because Saddam Hussein killed all the Mandelas.' The actual former South African president, of course, is still very much alive.” (CBS 20.09.07)

A university-educated, experienced and ensouled politician would not regularly make grotesque slips of this kind. But if he did misspeak occasionally, he would notice immediately and correct himself. In the later clone years, Bush has never been able to do this.

But what about Hillary Clinton? Is she really a tribal subset of mind-controlled clones? Follow the DNA. It's there in the lavatories, handkerchiefs, discarded nasal tissues, cosmetics applicators, bedroom dust, cutlery, drinking glasses and coffee cups. And look out for the little black box under the clothes. It's smaller than it used to be in the famous George Bush Jnr photographs (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here, plus comments here), but it can still be seen on a windy day.

More information about the use of human clones in American political management can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here.
http://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.com/2008...inton.html

[GeeGee]

That definitely raises suspicion in me. Could be a double.

http://z.about.com/d/womenshistory/1/0/t...ality=Full

This doesn't even look like Hillary Clinton.

[Mercy Now]

I was thinking doubles too GeeGee.

[spiritvoyager]

I'm not convinced by the differences that the author points out in the pictures.  Moles might be routinely airbrushed out of pictures.  I notice differences in brow lines and lip lines, but these could just reflect cosmetic habits.  The difference that stands out most to me is in the eyes and facial expression.  There is a cross-eyed Hillary that shows up in a couple of the pictures.  Cross-eyed Hillary's eyes also seem to be a little less deep set and the shape of the face, more full.  This could be the result of different camera angles or change in weight or health.  Still, there does seem to be a different energy emanating from cross-eyed Hillary.  It is more goofy, less evil.

[spiritvoyager]

Forgive me for beating a dead horse.  I discovered I could copy and paste these and thought it might be interesting to post them together.

The author suggests that this is the real Hillary Clinton (at a young age) and that she was terminated and cloned sometime during her husband's presidency.



Recent Photos



The Real Hillary??  The campaign photos below look like a different body from the recent photos above to me - mostly because of the eyes and the energy of the body language.  If the author is correct in his speculations, I would guess that there are at least two doubles.

 



 



The photo above looks like a pre-campaign senator photo.  What is that lapel pin she's wearing?

                                  

[Anu-021413]

Interesting stuff. Wonder why she won't come upstate for long or at all?