The Kuiper Belt Aliens, Fact or Fiction ?

[Golden Winged SnakeOiLion]

Poetic, yes. And well deserved. But you really do not need any KBA in that equation. Nor do you need Stewart's remote diagnosis on what is happening over here. It's winter in Europe. It is supposed to be like that right now. Not the first time, and not the last time. And btw, the global co2 warming theory © does not exclude snowstorms from happening.

maybe.

but then again how poetic would it be to create a crazy snow storm directly over top of the global elite's 'global warming' summit.

either way it's still a thing of beauty.

[Mercy Now]

GWSOL wrote:

And btw, the global co2 warming theory © does not exclude snowstorms from happening.

 Thank you! I'm not the only person that remembers my jr. high science.

 

[Anu-021413]

GWSOL wrote:

And btw, the global co2 warming theory © does not exclude snowstorms from happening.

 Thank you! I'm not the only person that remembers my jr. high science.

 

Sigh.. Does the "Global Warming" crowd attribute the anticipated eruption of the volcano in the Phillipines to such as well? The ash and gas expelled would S%$# all over the CO2 theories quickly.  Did we do that?
 All at the same time period of these sudden storms taking place in the world?
 Coincidentally, within specific countries, and cities of those who are home to those calling for a NWO. Those who attended the Copenhagen meeting. Besides, Copenhagen is said not to have had the type of weather they experienced in 14 yrs. 

I also noticed the composure of some of those officials who attended, and gave statements. Along with the rush of certain delegates to leave the country. They were visibly shaken. Worried. Concerned. Possibly in fear. Barry looked like he was on the verge of crying during the proclamation of victory.
 I believe because they knew what was really up with all the goings on. Even if most of the populace was not. Check the footage if you can find it, I saw it in real time.

Besides, the storms, and climates of places in the world are going to change. Simply because when the axis of rotation of the planet shifts, those places will be relocated to different climate zones. In the process, storms will worsen, and tectonic places we live on, will shift,bind, and break. It's happened in the past, it's going to happen again. We have nothing to do with that, nor does the KBA. As well, some events will be induced, by things that are NOT of human, or technological making. Things that are beyond Human understanding, and frankly, these NWO servants are pissing him off. Believe or not, is one's choice, but irregardless, it's happening. It's taken place, and will continue to do so. Eventually to a point where it's undeniable.
 You know what they say, "The beatings will continue until morale improves."

Simple cause and effect. Except the effect comes both naturally, and supernaturally.

Just my .02 cents.

[Golden Winged SnakeOiLion]

Here is a youtube with clips and pictures from this "storm". My god, I think we all have to die now ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFWvyVNr0ec

This is still within the scope of global warming theory, which does not predict anything relating to the weather (which is what I was talking about).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warm...ironmental

[Mercy Now]

GWSL posted: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warm...ironmental


This is what I was talking about too GWSOL.

This is not something new under the sun according to palaeoclimatology . Ice core samples indicate climate change has happened again and again. 

[Mercy Now]

Climate is not weather .  The snowstorm in Copenhagen in the  middle of December shouldn't come as a surprise. Better the the Climate Summit be held at Glacier National Park in the States where the glaciers are melting rapidly.

Climate Change ‘Greatest Threat’ to National Parks, Report Says
Drought. Floods. Death. It's already happening, the report says.



By David Frey, 10-09-09


Grinnell Glacier, Glacier National Park. Photo by Photo by David Restivo, courtesy of the National Park Service.


It’s not just melting ice at Glacier National Park. A report by the Natural Resources Defense Council calls climate change the “greatest threat” to America’s national parks.

It lists 25 parks most at risk to melting ice, drought, flooding, diminishing wildlife and other factors.

“This is not just a concern for the future,” says the report, which was produced by the Rocky Mountain Climate Organization for the NRDC. “The national parks that we Americans so cherish are already being harmed by a changing climate.”

Among the Western parks the report says are at risk are:

Yellowstone National Park, which is losing its whitebark pines. Their nuts are considered a major food for grizzlies. Summers have become hot enough to kill trout, it says.

Rocky Mountain National Park, which is losing its mature lodgepole pines.

Bandelier National Monument and Mesa Verde National Park, which have lost most of their piñon pines.

Zion is losing its piñon-juniper forests to drought, while suffering from more damaging floods.

Glacier National Park, where streams and waterfalls are vanishing along with the glaciers.

If we continue heedlessly adding heat-trapping pollution to the atmosphere, we could lose whole national parks for the first time,” the report says.

It outlines 11 top threats to national parks: loss of ice and snow; loss of water; higher seas and stronger storms that could affect coastal parks; more flooding; a loss of plants; a loss of wildlife; loss of historic and cultural resources; intolerable heat in desert parks; loss of fishing; more overcrowding and higher concentrations of air pollution.

The report calls for 32 specific actions, including new and expanded national parks, protection of migration corridors between parks and national action to limit heat-trapping gases.

http://www.newwest.net/city/article/clim...C108/L108/

[Mercy Now]

I find this man's  assertion compelling as well.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/climategate...ng-models/

[Lux Lucius]

I just have to ask.  Where does the credible info that says there are millions of alien space crafts lurching in the Oort Cloud come from?  I have read other posts on this page that states that.  People post it like its fact but of course it sounds some what fantasized coming from my eyes.  But no one ever seems to post some science and info for some one to look at that try and prove these claims.  I have looked at some pics that are said the be crafts but obviously they could be anything.   

To try and not overload y'all with questions from my stirring brain, I'll end on this one.  Here is a qoute from a post by Avatar:  "The KUIPER BELT ALIENS (KBA) are clearly some kind of "Galactic Alliance", comprising various "Alien Groups" that include the Ataeians, the Pleiadian Giants, the Sirians, the Kilrotians, the Arinians,......."

Obvious question... Where does the info come that explain all these species?  Are these just metaphors to you or?

Just a curious person, not trying to stir any one up....

[Anu-021413]

Scientific evidence you ask. Well, apparently the mass gathering has been tracked since 79'. The fact that it's been kept to the fringes, could mean that it's not so. However there's much evidence to support it as fact, aside from the "silence" on it.

More UFO sightings on the planet over the last few yrs, than at any other point in history. Small as some of the sighted craft are, they had to have come from somewhere. If you liken them to planes off a carrier in some remote portion of the Earth, they have to come from somewhere. [Yes you've got tankers, but generally speaking, they have to land, and takeoff from somewhere, if they're that far from home.] However, if you're expect them or anything else, to just pop up and say hey, you'll be sorely dissapointed. Would you do such a thing, with things here moving towards what they are?

Second, the evidence written in stone over a wide variety of cultures. Unfortunately, in a case like the Sumerian Text's, only a few people can decipher them. Not all of those persons have the intent of full disclosure,at least without ulterior motive of directive. Still, it says what it says, as well the carvings,drawings,etc, show what they show.

Third, Biblical reference to such is abundant. At a certain point, it's the focal point of the assertion that there's alot of something up there. However, if you don't believe in it, and readily dismiss all that's written within it, you'll dismiss anything else. However, it's a basis to not only discern, but validate everything else. Sure many religions and such, speak of these times, but from what context? Goal oriented? Or consequence based? From one particular perspective, or all encompassing?

Fourth, the rapid pace of world events. You've had alot of changes take place in a short amount of time. I you know who's really behind what, you'll see that it's merely preparation for things to come. The faster things move,the more obvious it get's.

Fifthly, there are those who've had contacts, so to speak. Advising,telling, and warning of what's to come. Some valid, some not even remotely close.
As far as the names, does it really matter right now? Is that basis for validation, a label? You've heard of the "Grays," and Humans here are referred to as "Terrans." Or maybe not.  Would the "Terran" label mean that we don't exist? It's arrogant to assume we're it. Some of science, would have us believe that as fact. Just as the world was flat, the sun revolves around the Earth, etc.

Science, while useful and relevant, is still not the end, all be all of answers. Not when there are things taking place that science cannot explain, and/or are beyond what since at this stage, can show/prove. Nor,in future context, teach you, in some cases.
There's a fine line between science, and that little thing called faith. Since many things have happened due to faith, that science cannot define,nor understand, it becomes clearer that science is not the end all of answers. Even within that, the substitution of one for the other, should show there's an effort to conceal things.
Ask yourself why?
Your question is at, let's say, the answer end. If you really want to know, you'll check all these things out, and work your way back to the beginning. At least at that point, you'll have the answer your looking for as it is now. Besides, if you were just given the answer, would you truly learn anything from it? Now I don't know what you may or may not know. I'm basing my answer on how your question reads. Not trying to ruffle you, but you seem to have some preconceived notions. [ re-read you post, and you'll see where that would be perceived.] I you are serious about finding out what's up, I'd loose them if you're going to ask others for information.  Also, while others have their perspectives,knowledge on the subject, I can only answer from mine.

It was written, and said, "If you cannot understand the Earthly things, how will you understand the unearthly things I speak of?"

[Diogenes]

maybe.

but then again how poetic would it be to create a crazy snow storm directly over top of the global elite's 'global warming' summit.

either way it's still a thing of beauty.

As a Cab Driver in Copenhagen. I can only say, that was not a snowstorm.
It was beautifull, and fun to drive in.... :D

But it was not a storm, but typical Scandinavian weather.
And that kind of weather visit us, every 2 or 3 year(since we are south Scandinavia).