Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
Posts: 45
Threads: 3
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
Posts: 45
Threads: 3
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
Hereââ¬â¢s a recent news story I ran across about KJV.
Square Root Phi x Pi x e proves King James Orthodox Bible is Masonic Fraud
(Scoreboard Canada contributor Feb. 8th, 2008)
The illuminati do everything they can to pervert the truth and blend fact with fiction and lies with truth. There has been much controversy for many years about the veracity, accuracy and ultimately - legitimacy of the King James Bible. This writer believes that the utilization of advanced Masonic mathematics may tend to prove that the Book is of Illuminist and not Divine origin. The evidence will be made available and as always, the reader must decide.
CONTROVERSY OVER LEGITIMACY OF KING JAMES BIBLE:
1. Background on belief that King James bible is a fraud or concoction. Reader must do own research and analysis: more / more
2. The square root is used by Freemasons: more .
3. Phi or the Golden Proportion / Divine Proportion is used by Freemasons: more and more .
4. Pi link to the Occult: more .
5. The euler number and music as an occult indoctrination method: more and more / more .
6. Sir Francis Bacon wrote the King James Bible and he was an occultist: more .
7. The Orthodox King James Bible is 1086 pages in length: google King James Bible 1086 pages or more Google The Following: Square Root Phi x Pi x e - The answer will be 108.627097 . 1086
CONCLUSION: It appears that although the Orthodox Church is against Freemasonry - more ...
that there has been a penetration, an infiltration of the evil in the Holy Book itself. Coincidence or Conspiracy, the reader must decide. See also / scroll down 50% ]http://www.rense.com/general47/deut.htm]more [/url].
This variant of the Bible is linked of course, to the UK, Headquarters of the Illuminati and the ancient home of Sir Francis Bacon. Thomas Nelson Publishers creates the book. more .
There are links to the Rockefeller empire and Thomas Nelson. more .
There also may be a Mark of the Devil on the New KJV of the Bible. more .
Further, Evidence may be the Masonic created city of Phoenix , Arizona - see: more and the altitude of Phoenix: 1086 Feet - more . More Coincidence?
http://www.scoreboard-canada.com/babylon...efraud.htm
Posts: 45
Threads: 3
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
How did we get the King James Bible?
After ascending the throne of England, King James held a court conference in Hampton in January A.D. 1604 to help settle some church related problems. The previous century had witnessed the birth of the Church of England and the Reformation, both of which had come out of the Catholic Church. Add to this the zeal of the Puritans (who believed in nothing but the Bible only, and who had managed to gain some political clout) and itââ¬â¢s easy to see that James had inherited a religious time bomb, just waiting to explode! His desire was to assemble a conference of bishops, clergymen, college professors and Puritans and try to resolve differences. Although a new Bible translation was not on the agenda for discussion, Dr. John Reynolds (president of Corpus Christi College at Oxford) proposed the idea that a new Bible translation would help appease the situation. Apparently, some of them held to the ââ¬ËGreat Bibleââ¬â¢ of A.D. 1539 (which some of them called ââ¬Ëcorruptââ¬â¢) while others held the ââ¬ËGeneva Bibleââ¬â¢ of A.D. 1560 (which was filled with marginal notes and references, and some thought this detracted from the Scriptures. The Geneva Bible was also the first Bible to be brought to America.). Thus, under pressure, the King gave his approval for a new translation to begin, which was to become known as ââ¬ËThe Authorized Versionââ¬â¢, and later, ââ¬ËThe King James Bibleââ¬â¢.
In July 1604, King James wrote to Bishop Bancroft requesting him to select 54 learned and able men to the task of translation. Of this group, a couple died before beginning the work and a few were unable to participate because of commitments. The 47 remaining scholars were (according to Eldred Thomas in his book ââ¬ËBible Versionsââ¬â¢) comprised of six Bishops and 41 were university professors, of which 30 held doctorates and 23 were unusually gifted in Hebrew and Greek. The 47 were appointed and divided into six groups (two at Westminster, two at Oxford and two at Cambridge) who worked under some 15 stringent guidelines, one of which was that they were to keep the old ecclesiastical words. For example, ââ¬Ëchurchââ¬â¢ was not to be translated ââ¬Ëcongregationââ¬â¢. Apparently, none of the translators received any pay for their work, as they gladly volunteered their time.
In A.D. 1611, the work was finally completed and about 2,000 copies were printed in London by Mr. Robert Barker. The very first printing became known as the ââ¬ËHe Bibleââ¬â¢, because the typesetter left off the letter ââ¬ËSââ¬â¢ in the 3rd person pronoun ââ¬Ësheââ¬â¢, thus rendering it ââ¬Ëheââ¬â¢ (emphasized in the following verse). Rut.3:15, ââ¬ÅAlso he said, Bring the vail that thou hast upon thee, and hold it. And when she held it, he measured six measures of barley, and laid it on her: and he went into the city.ââ¬Â This was corrected in the A.D. 1613 printing, which became known as the ââ¬ËShe Bibleââ¬â¢. (NOI. The author owns a digitally scanned reproduction of the complete ââ¬ËHe Bibleââ¬â¢.)
The King James Bible was first printed by Cambridge in A.D. 1629 and was later ââ¬Ëreworkedââ¬â¢ a couple of times to correct spelling mistakes, which crept in because of early printing methods. The Cambridge Edition Bible that we use today is based on the corrected edition of A.D. 1769. It contains 66 books, which have 1,189 chapters, which have a total of 31,102 verses, which have 789,314 words in them, which are made up of 3,221,202 letters.
Are There Problems with the King James Bible??
ââºIMPORTANT NOTE: This dictionary is based on the A.D. 1611 Authorized Version of the Holy Bible (sometimes known as the ââ¬ËHe Bibleââ¬â¢ ââ¬â see above) using the Cambridge text of the KJV (as opposed to the Oxford text). This is important to note because there are a few slight differences between the 1611 Bible and the KJV of today. There are even two or three minor differences between some modern KJV Bible editions, so the reader may find a variation of a word that is not in his or her KJV. Do not despair.
Some people believe the KJV is archaic and full of problems. It is the opinion of this author that, although there are certain minor differences between the A.D. 1611 and the modern KJV, there are no doctrinal problems or errors as such. Rather, the modern KJV is an accurate and trustworthy duplicate of the 1611 with only minor exceptions. (This opinion considers the 66 Books of the Bible only (39 in the OT, and 27 in the NT), without the apocrypha, the reading schedules or any notes of any kind.)
Posts: 45
Threads: 3
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
Iââ¬â¢m wondering what do you hope to gain by trying to promote religion at a non-religious forum. Itââ¬â¢s kind of like a Satanist trying to promote Satanism at a Christian forum. The members here are very knowledgeable and I can guarantee you that you wonââ¬â¢t be able to sell religion to any of them.
Posts: 280
Threads: 31
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation:
0
All I can say is, if you are having religious experiences in the astral, it is most likely not a true experience. The astral is filled with demonic beings who deceive others, along with the secret government utilizing technology to capture soul-personalities.
I know many ex-Christian's who are very experienced in astral projection, and all of them had seen Jesus in the astral when they first discovered this ability. They now realize that it was created from their own intent to see a religious figure. Religious beliefs gives you a very filtered experience in the astral realm.
Posts: 287
Threads: 32
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation:
0
Knowing Jesus doesn't always mean "seeing" Him. Please understand that people who beleieve in Christ are no different than you, except maybe you are both at different levels of spirituality.
We have to respect each others opinions and beliefs. I dont try to convince anyone that I am accurate and they are wrong. Thats the problem with alot of world leaders and the source of many problems throughout the world.
Instead of promoting my beliefs, I try to look at anothers beliefs to analyze and understand them.
NOT ONE OF US HERE HAS ALL THE ANSWERS. REGARDLESS OF HOW INTELLIGENT OR RELIGIOUS YOU ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Its about learning, and sharing with those who care to learn.
As Stewart says . "know your audience".
Posts: 280
Threads: 31
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation:
0
I do respect others beliefs, I don't know where you got the idea that I don't. All I'm saying is astral experiences are filtered if you are of a certain religion. This doesn't mean only Christians will see Christ, it applies to ALL religions and ALL deities.
|
