The Source Field Investigations

[Sifter]

I think you will enjoy this. The most fascinating topic to me, that of mind, thoughts and much more. David Wilcock's new book The Source Field Investigation.

http://youtu.be/nR-klTa1y54

[flash=425,344]http://www.youtube.com/v/nR-klTa1y54&hl=en&fs=1[/flash]

[NobleSy]

This is really thought provoking. Thanks for posting it.

[NobleSy]

Now I can't wait for 2012. icon_biggrin

[Sifter]

Yes, it is interesting and apparently the book (I heard is now on the best seller list, haven't checked) is chock full of scientific facts... mind you, he and other 'thinkers' do some speculating, but I think it's all dot connections speculating which does have merit, for sure.

Looks to me like the fewer numbered psychopaths (reptilians whatchawannacallit)(much smaller number than the good guys)have been doing a smear campaign to throw a ringer into what looks to be in actuality, a Golden Age coming wherein man becomes Gods. That's my take on it.

The illuminati (the FAKE ONES that distorted technology) should be called the MisAlluminated Thwarters.. HEE HEE, yes we need some good news for a change.

[Sifter]

This is an interview between David Wilcock and Benjamin Fulford (I don't know what to think of him, but I hope that he's right). We have all been influenced by smear tactics of many speakers... I hope it's true about all his "ninja turtles" that's a joke, but if you're up on him, you know what i mean... lol

http://rabbithole2.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3130

[BlueMoon]

I don't know what to think of Ben Fulford either but I have heard of the white dragons as a group attempting to disolve the power of the illuminati. Is Ben Fulford really one of them or is he just a well informed conspiracy theorist who likes the importance of people thinking he is connected. ?????

Getting any info on the White Dragons, if it does indeed exist, is next to impossible, so it does raise suspicions of his authenticity. Anyway, it is interesting to listen to and I also hope he is right.

As to the Source Field Investigations video, I did listen to the first 25 min. and its pretty fascinating stuff. David Wilcock has many good videos and I saw him in person about 3 yrs ago at a 2 day seminar and his information appeard to be well researched. He used slides and credited all sources of his research that he put together to uphold his hypothoses and theories.

Thanks for posting Sifter. I haven't followed Wilcock in a while and forgot how interesting he was especially about universal energy. I may get his new book.

[xanthas]

This is old. I've stopped listening after 2:30 minutes. Amit Goswami wrote about "The Self-Aware Universe" (i.e., 'conscious') in 1995.

Wilcock is regurgitating the same idea that has been spun off by Louise Hay (during  the mid-70s) and endless others thereafter.

Another big time promoter of a 'loving universe' was "Conversations with God" scribe Neale Donald Walsch, published in the mid 90s (like Goswami's book).

I also had to stop reading the 'interview' that DW did with Fulford because he shows off, bragging that he still is around when apparently everybody else - even a CIA fella - has been shot! and that's a [color="#ff0000"]red[/color] flag.

Fulford is a nutter. Here are letters that he apparently channelled from his dead grampa who instructed him to send the letters (three) to David Rockefeller calling on Rockefeller's "humanity"... http://www.rense.com/general79/benjk.htm

[Forbes is an Illuminati magazine and regularly publishes a "100 richest people in America List" and a 'Fortune 500', 'The World's Billionaire', etc., etc. Incidentally, in line with the theme of Forbes and the global economic crash, this is a very fitting article.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/panosmourdou...dead-cash/

I particularly like the 'your dead ca$h' line, as if 'ca$h' were a life form....]

Sweet... One should note that the above post on Rense dates back to 2007. Rockefeller attended this year's Bilderberg meeting in St. Moritz, Switzerland in June at the ripe old age of 96. The protesters gathered at the meeting even gave him a birthday cake. Seems, as if Fulford's letters did not have much impact on Rockefeller's "natural" psychopathic inclinations.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/series/b...ockefeller

Never mind Wilcock repeating other people's 'teachings' and selling them as 'his' own "discovery".

So, to answer your question in another thread, Sifter, Wilcock is a waste of money.

[xanthas]

Continuing on Fulford.... This last letter is very funny - if you don't take it too seriously and definitely puts Fulford in the 'mental asylum' category. Again, channelled by Ben from his old gramp 'up in heaven'...and sent to David Rockefeller himself.

I highlighted the extremely questionable 'suggestions' and lines in this letter written in 2007 that would make anyone with at least some degree of awareness think twice of taking Fulford's word as "a given" and 'well-intended' for mere mortal human beings' future.
[size="+1"]
[/size] Dear David,
Here is a humble suggestion.

[color="#0000ff"]We would like to see your Armageddon. It would be a fitting way to announce a fresh start for the planet Earth. [/color]

[color="#0000ff"]Please, turn on your hologram machines, bring out your flying saucers, fill your screens with your best computer graphics.[/color]

We want to see [color="#5500ff"]the greatest show the planet has ever seen[/color].

[color="#ff0000"]But please, no hurting people and no vandalism.[/color]

Although perhaps [color="#0000ff"]it might be neat to watch you zap an Antarctic mountain or two with your earthquake machine and [color="#ff0000"]any other toys[/color] you may have stashed away[/color]. [color="#ff0000"]

We want to have a party such has never happened before. [/color]

After the party is over, [color="#ff0000"]how about hosting a Global pow-wow[/color] to decide how to carry out an intensive, unprecedented, three-year campaign to eliminate the 5 curses of humanity: war, poverty, environmental destruction, ignorance and disease.

[color="#0000ff"]At the end of those three years, every child on earth should have a full stomach and a [color="#ff0000"]full[/color] (!?!) mind.[/color] (filled with what? That's the question!)

It would also be a wonderful thing if we as a species could [color="#0000ff"]divert as many resources as possible[/color] to the task of [color="#ff0000"]ensuring immortality[/color] for all humans on the planet. Of course we would need to enhance our intelligence and release all the hidden technology that could benefit the species if we are to be able to [color="#ff0000"]take care of all these new immortals[/color].

Once this accomplished, humanity will be able to reach for the stars and beyond in ways we cannot even imagine.

Sincerely yours,
[color="#ff0000"]
G.T. Fulford and Benjamin Fulford[/color]


In conjunction with the previously written letters, Fulford's agenda is, IMHO,  extremely questionable.

[BlueMoon]

Xanthas....OK, So you got all of that about Wilcock after 2:30 min. of his video. I have not listened to this entire one however, I have listened to others. I do not question that this is old info. Most information is. However when someone takes info from many different previous studies and uses them for a new hypotheses or theory, sometimes the information brings up a new way of looking at something or a new theory entriely. David Wilcock always gives credit to the people whose studies he uses. He does not claim them as his own. His conclusions from the studies are his own and there is a difference.

I am not going to get into a discussion about David Wilcock because I really don't care enough about him. He is also not in the category of conspiracy theorists. He leans toward more scientific things and does extensive research on energy and human interactions. Sometimes it spills over like the interview with Fulford and others but it does not seem to be his main objective.

I'm not here to defend Wilcock. Everyone should form their own opinion anyway. Just wanted to point that out.

[Sifter]

I usually read with caution.
One thing that is recognized in this rather long video (of which you watch 2:30 minutes Xanthas) is that Wilcock OFTEN gives credit where credit is due (in the talk).

Why not set aside your 'druthers' and listen to the whole thing? I did and believe me it took some doing because I've been influenced just as you to dismiss ... how do U know what has influenced you when it's clear that it HAS enough for you to only watch 2:3 minutes... that's a clear indicated that you've been influenced to stop.

I've been influenced as well, and I was surprised to even have listened to the whole thing even while hearing that it's an introduction, no less.

I refuse the concept that I am powerless and defective.
Know that at the get go k? Given that premise, the message is more clear.