There Was No Pandemic

[Hissil]

2023-06-22 ::: There Was No Pandemic (essay)
There Was No Pandemic

By Denis G. Rancourt, PhD

June 22, 2023

This is radical.

The essay is based on my May 17, 2023 testimony for the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) in Ottawa, Canada, my 894-page book of exhibits in support of that testimony, and our continued research.

I am an accomplished interdisciplinary scientist and physicist, and a former tenured Full Professor of physics and lead scientist, originally at the University of Ottawa.

I have written over 30 scientific reports relevant to COVID, starting April 18, 2020 for the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (ocla.ca/covid), and recently for a new non-profit corporation (correlation‑canada.org/research). Presently, all my work and interviews about COVID are documented on my website created to circumvent the barrage of censorship (denisrancourt.ca).

In addition to critical reviews of published science, the main data that my collaborators and I analyse is all‑cause mortality.

All-cause mortality by time (day, week, month, year, period), by jurisdiction (country, state, province, county), and by individual characteristics of the deceased (age, sex, race, living accomodations) is the most reliable data for detecting and epidemiologically characterizing events causing death, and for gauging the population-level impact of any surge or collapse in deaths from any cause.

Such data is not susceptible to reporting bias or to any bias in attributing causes of death. We have used it to detect and characterize seasonality, heat waves, earthquakes, economic collapses, wars, population aging, long-term societal development, and societal assaults such as those occurring in the COVID period, in many countries around the world, and over recent history, 1900-present.

Interestingly, none of the post-second-world-war Centers-for-Disease-Control-and-Prevention-promoted (CDC‑promoted) viral respiratory disease pandemics (1957-58, “H2N2”; 1968, “H3N2”; 2009, “H1N1 again”) can be detected in the all‑cause mortality of any country. Unlike all the other causes of death that are known to affect mortality, these so‑called pandemics did not cause any detectable increase in mortality, anywhere.

The large 1918 mortality event, which was recruited to be a textbook viral respiratory disease pandemic (“H1N1”), occurred prior to the inventions of antibiotics and the electron microscope, under horrific post-war public-sanitation and economic-stress conditions. The 1918 deaths have been proven by histopathology of preserved lung tissue to have been caused by bacterial pneumonia. This is shown in several independent and non-contested published studies.

My first report analysing all-cause mortality was published on June 2, 2020, at censorship-prone Research Gate, and was entitled “All-cause mortality during COVID-19 - No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response”. It showed that hot spots of sudden surges in all‑cause mortality occurred only in specific locations in the Northern-hemisphere Western World, which were synchronous with the March 11, 2020 declaration of a pandemic. Such synchronicity is impossible within the presumed framework of a spreading viral respiratory disease, with or without airplanes, because the calculated time from seeding to mortality surge is highly dependent on local societal circumstances, by several months to years. I attributed the excess deaths to aggressive measures and hospital treatment protocols known to have been applied suddenly at that time in those localities.

The work was pursued in greater depth with collaborators for several years and continues. We have shown repeatedly that excess mortality most often refused to cross national borders and inter-state lines. The invisible virus targets the poor and disabled and carries a passport. It also never kills until governments impose socio-economic and care-structure transformations on vulnerable groups within the domestic population.

Here are my conclusions, from our detailed studies of all-cause mortality in the COVID period, in combination with socio-economic and vaccine-rollout data:

-    If there had been no pandemic propaganda or coercion, and governments and the medical establishment had simply gone on with business as usual, then there would not have been any excess mortality
-    There was no pandemic causing excess mortality
-    Measures caused excess mortality
-    COVID-19 vaccination caused excess mortality

Regarding the vaccines, we quantified many instances in which a rapid rollout of a dose in the imposed vaccine schedule was synchronous with an otherwise unexpected peak in all-cause mortality, at times in the seasonal cycle and of magnitudes that have not previously been seen in the historic record of mortality.

In this way, we showed that the vaccination campaign in India caused the deaths of 3.7 million fragile residents. In Western countries, we quantified the average all-ages rate of death to be 1 death for every 2000 injections, to increase exponentially with age (doubling every additional 5 years of age), and to be as large as 1 death for every 100 injections for those 80 years and older. We estimated that the vaccines had killed 13 million worldwide.



If one accepts my above-numbered conclusions, and the analyses that we have performed, then there are several implications about how one perceives reality regarding what actually did and did not occur.

First, whereas epidemics of fatal infections are very real in care homes, in hospitals, and with degenerate living conditions, the viral respiratory pandemic risk promoted by the USA‑led “pandemic response” industry is not a thing. It is most likely fabricated and maintained for ulterior motives, other than saving humanity.

Second, in addition to natural events (heat waves, earthquakes, extended large-scale droughts), significant events that negatively affect mortality are large assaults against domestic populations, affecting vulnerable residents, such as:

-    sudden devastating economic deterioration (the Great Depression, the dust bowl, the dissolution of the Soviet Union),
-    war (including social-class restructuring),
-    imperial or economic occupation and exploitation (including large-scale exploitative land use), and
-    the well-documented measures and destruction applied during the COVID period.

Otherwise, in a stable society, mortality is extremely robust and is not subject to large rapid changes. There is no empirical evidence that large changes in mortality can be induced by sudden appearances of new pathogens. In the contemporary era of the dominant human species, humanity is its worst enemy, not nature.

Third, coercive measures imposed to reduce the risk of transmission (such as distancing, direction arrows, lockdown, isolation, quarantine, Plexiglas barriers, face shields and face masks, elbow bumps, etc.) are palpably unscientific; and the underlying concern itself regarding “spread” was not ever warranted and is irrational, since there is no evidence in reliable mortality data that there ever was a particularly virulent pathogen.

In fact, the very notion of “spread” during the COVID period is rigorously disproved by the temporal and spatial variations of excess all-cause mortality, everywhere that it is sufficiently quantified, worldwide. For example, the presumed virus that killed 1.3 million poor and disabled residents of the USA did not cross the more-than-thousand-kilometer land border with Canada, despite continuous and intense economic exchanges. Likewise, the presumed virus that caused synchronous mortality hotspots in March-April-May 2020 (such as in New York, Madrid region, London, Stockholm, and northern Italy) did not spread beyond those hotspots. 

Interestingly, in this regard, the historical seasonal variations (12 month period) in all-cause mortality, known for more than 100 years, are inverted in the northern and southern global hemispheres, and show no evidence of “spread” whatsoever. Instead, these patterns, in a given hemisphere, show synchronous increases and decreases of mortality across the entire hemisphere. Would the “spreading” causal agent(s) always take exactly 6 months to cross into the other hemisphere, where it again causes mortality changes that are synchronous across the hemisphere? Many epidemiologists have long-ago concluded that person-to-person “contact” spreading of respiratory diseases cannot explain and is disproved by the seasonal patterns of all-cause mortality. Why the CDC et al. are not systematically ridiculed in this regard is beyond this scientist’s comprehension.

Instead, outside of extremely poor living conditions, we should look to the body of work produced by Professor Sheldon Cohen and co‑authors (USA) who established that two dominant factors control whether intentionally challenged college students become infected and the severity of the respiratory illness when they are infected:

-    degree of experienced psychological stress
-    degree of social isolation

The negative impact of experienced psychological stress on the immune system is a large current and established area of scientific study, dutifully ignored by vaccine interests, and we now know that the said impact is dramatically larger in elderly individuals, where nutrition (gut biome ecology) is an important co-factor.

Of course, I do not mean that causal agents do not exist, such as bacteria, which can cause pneumonia; nor that there are not dangerous environmental concentrations of such causal agents in proximity to fragile individuals, such as in hospitals and on clinicians’ hands, notoriously.

Fourth, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess mortality, the debate about gain-of-function research and an escaped bioweapon is irrelevant.

I do not mean that the Department of Defence (DoD) does not fund gain-of-function and bioweapon research (abroad, in particular), I do not mean that there are not many US patents for genetically modified microbial organisms having potential military applications, and I do not mean that there have not previously been impactful escapes or releases of bioweapon vectors and pathogens. For example, the Lyme disease controversy in the USA may be an example of a bioweapon leak (see Kris Newby’s 2019 book “Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons”).

Generally, for obvious reasons, any pathogen that is extremely virulent will not also be extremely contagious. There are billions of years of cumulative evolutionary pressures against the existence of any such pathogen, and that result will be deeply encoded into all lifeforms.

Furthermore, it would be suicidal for any regime to vehemently seek to create such a pathogen. Bioweapons are intended to be delivered to specific target areas, except in the science fiction wherein immunity from a bioweapon that is both extremely virulent and extremely contagious can be reliably delivered to one’s own population and soldiers.

In my view, if anything COVID is close to being a bioweapon, it is the military capacity to massively, and repeatedly, rollout individual injections, which are physical vectors for whichever substances the regime wishes to selectively inject into chosen populations, while imposing complete compliance down to one’s own body, under the cover of protecting public health.

This is the same regime that practices wars of complete nation destruction and societal annihilation, under the cover of spreading democracy and women’s rights. And I do not mean China.

Fifth, again, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess mortality, there was no need for any special treatment protocols, beyond the usual thoughtful, case-by-case, diagnostics followed by the clinician’s chosen best approach.

Instead, vicious new protocols killed patients in hotspots that applied those protocols in the first months of the declared pandemic.

This was followed in many states by imposed coercive societal measures, which were contrary to individual health: fear, panic, paranoia, induced psychological stress, social isolation, self-victimization, loss of work and volunteer activity, loss of social status, loss of employment, business bankruptcy, loss of usefulness, loss of caretakers, loss of venues and mobility, suppression of freedom of expression, etc.

Only the professional class did better, comfortably working from home, close to family, while being catered to by an army of specialised home-delivery services.

Unfortunately, the medical establishment did not limit itself to assaulting and isolating vulnerable patients in hospitals and care facilities. It also systematically withdrew normal care, and attacked physicians who refused to do so.

In virtually the entire Western World, antibiotic prescriptions were cut and maintained low by approximately 50% of the pre-COVID rates. This would have had devastating effects in the USA, in particular, where:

-    the CDC’s own statistics, based on death certificates, has approximately 50% of the million or so deaths associated with COVID having bacterial pneumonia as a listed comorbidity (there was a massive epidemic of bacterial pneumonia in the USA, which no one talked about)
-    the Southern poor states historically have much higher antibiotic prescription rates (this implies high susceptibility to bacterial pneumonia)
-    excess mortality during the COVID period is very strongly correlated (r = +0.86) — in fact proportional to — state-wise poverty

Sixth, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess mortality, there was no public-health reason to develop and deploy vaccines; not even if one accepted the tenuous proposition that any vaccine has ever been effective against a presumed viral respiratory disease.

Add to this that all vaccines are intrinsically dangerous and our above-described vaccine-dose fatality rate quantifications, and we must recognize that the vaccines contributed significantly to excess mortality everywhere that they were imposed.

In conclusion, the excess mortality was not caused by any particularly virulent new pathogen. COVID so-called response in-effect was a massive multi-pronged state and iatrogenic attack against populations, and against societal support structures, which caused all the excess mortality, in every jurisdiction.

It is only natural now to ask “what drove this?”, “who benefited?” and “which groups sustained permanent structural disadvantages?”

In my view, the COVID assault can only be understood in the symbiotic contexts of geopolitics and large-scale social-class transformations. Dominance and exploitation are the drivers. The failing USA-centered global hegemony and its machinations create dangerous conditions for virtually everyone.

https://denisrancourt.ca/uploads_entries...%20pub.pdf

[Hissil]

Pandemic….What Pandemic?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Se9cjqSTPKY

The Exposé | Patricia Harrity

As recently as yesterday the 3rd of August 2023, over three and a half years after its first utterance “Covid is Airborne” was trending on Twitter! The hashtag fills most of us with despair. However, even within the “truther” community there is divided opinion on the origins of this so-called “novel virus.” While some are convinced that there was a deliberate lab leak, there are those among us [Truth11.com included] who believe it never even existed in the first place, there was no “pandemic” it was purely a psychological operation.

This is the view of Doctor Simon Lee, Science Officer at Anew UK, he explains why that is in the article below.
Pandemic…What Pandemic?

“Increasingly, politicians are seen simply as managers of public life, but now, they have discovered a new role that restores their power and authority. Instead of delivering dreams, politicians now promise to protect us—from nightmares. Politicians say that they will rescue us from dreadful dangers that we cannot see and do not understand.” Adam Curtis

Incredibly, many people still believe that the world recently experienced a deadly Coronavirus pandemic that killed millions of people. Many people in the so-called “truther” community are now pushing the false narrative of a genetically engineered bioweapon that was leaked from a lab.

There is a considerable amount of evidence that this was in reality not a real pandemic but a pseudopandemic psy-op. In fact, more and more people are questioning the very idea of all pandemics, including the famous 1917-18 Spanish Flu.

The large 1918 mortality event has become a textbook viral respiratory disease pandemic allegedly caused by the “H1N1” strain of influenza virus. It occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and before the invention of the electron microscope. It happened under horrific post-war public sanitation, economic, and emotional stress conditions.

But did you know that experiments intended to demonstrate transmission of this supposedly highly contagious disease ended in failure? The 1918 deaths have now been proven by histopathology of preserved lung tissue to have been caused by bacterial pneumonia rather than a virus that has never been proven to exist. This is evidenced by several independent and non-contested published studies.

Interestingly, NONE of the post-World War 2 CDC-promoted flu pandemics (1957-58, “H2N2 flu”; 1968, “H3N2 flu”; 2009, “H1N1 flu” again) can be detected in the all-cause mortality figures of any country. These so-called pandemics did not result in any detectable increase in mortality, anywhere. There is no empirical evidence that big increases in mortality can be caused by the sudden appearance of a new pathogen (especially not imaginary viral pathogens).

The entire covid pandemic narrative rests on two main pillars: that a novel pathogenic virus was actually identified, and that a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test could accurately identify the alleged virus. If either of these pillars are not correct, the entire covid narrative comes crashing down. Neither of them is correct.

A team of twenty-two scientists submitted a retraction request to the journal that published the original SARS-CoV-2 PCR protocol in 2020. They had identified “numerous technical and scientific errors”, one of the most serious of which was that the test was based on theoretical sequences of the alleged virus, produced by a laboratory in Communist China, as none of the actual “virus” was available. The team also highlighted the problem of cycle thresholds. PCR tests amplify genetic material, and if the level of amplification is too high, the result becomes meaningless. Laboratories worldwide tested using high cycle number testing protocols.

The PCR test used for supposed virus detection was designed to generate false positives and the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been properly isolated and shown to exist as a physical entity let alone cause any disease.

So, what does the epidemiological data tell us? Surely there must have been large numbers of deaths and very sick people if a deadly virus was really rampaging across the globe?

On March 11, 2020, the coronavirus “pandemic” was declared which did initially lead to sudden surges in all-cause mortality but only in specific locations in the Western World and they were synchronous. This synchronicity is incompatible with the notion of a spreading contagious viral respiratory disease.

The presumed virus that caused synchronous mortality clusters in the spring of 2020 (such as in New York, Madrid, London, Stockholm, and northern Italy) did not spread beyond those cluster hotspots.

Immediately after the WHO declared a pandemic and instructed hospitals to be ready, the death rate dramatically increased in various European countries, US States and Canadian provinces. These peaks are unprecedented in their scale and the fact that they take place outside of the usual flu season. They occur simultaneously in geographic areas separated by thousands of miles, yet not necessarily in neighbouring countries or even provinces.

Comparisons of excess mortality across countries have actively disproved the viral hypothesis. For example, the contrast between neighbouring countries Spain and Portugal, where the former had 157% excess deaths, at the same time the latter peaked at 21%.

The same is true of Italy and Slovenia. During this initial period (the first wave), Italian excess mortality reached 86%, whilst the Slovenian excess mortality peaked at 11%. Italy’s excess deaths were entirely concentrated in the North of the country, where Bergamo reached a 1,000% excess.

Belgium’s excess deaths peaked at 105%, the Netherlands’ was 70%, whilst France’s was 61%. Neighbouring Germany’s excess deaths only reached 12% during this initial period.

A similar picture was seen in the US. At the time New York was suffering an over 130% increase in excess mortality (over 630% in some parts of New York City), but neighbouring Vermont and nearby New Hampshire and Maine had little to no excess deaths.

“A virus pandemic, which afflicts countries so differently, cannot actually exist, especially in today’s times.” Köhnlein and Engelbrecht

Excess mortality most often did not cross-national borders and inter-state lines. The invisible virus cannot possibly specifically target the poor and disabled or respect borders. It also cannot wait until governments impose socio-economic and care protocol changes on vulnerable groups before it kills.

How could a virus spread without noticeably affecting mortality rates, then suddenly transform itself into the worst killer in a century upon command from the WHO? In reality, the geographic and temporal movement of the mortality spikes is inconsistent with what would be expected from a contagious disease.

It is far more likely that the excess mortality was due to the implementation of lethal pandemic preparedness measures across the countries and regions of the world.

‘In view of the fact that very different mortality rates are reported in different European countries, it is reasonable to assume that a differently aggressive therapy could be responsible for this.’ Claus Köhnlein

Iatrocide was the real cause of excess deaths, not a viral pandemic. Inhumane new protocols killed patients in regions that applied those protocols in the first months of the declared pandemic.

This was followed in many states by imposed coercive societal measures, which were damaging to individual health by spreading fear, panic, paranoia, psychological stress, social isolation, loss of work, business bankruptcy, etc.

The consequences of lockdowns were as devastating as they were predictable. On the 23rd of January 2020, the CCP ordered a lockdown of 58 million people in Hubei province on the basis of just 18 deaths. Wuhan, with a population of 9 million, is known as “Smog City” in China, however, air pollution was never considered to be a factor in these deaths.

Faked videos surfaced of people in Wuhan supposedly dropping dead in the streets which had the effect of terrifying the world.

As a consequence, Italy put nearly 60 million people in lockdown, the largest lockdown in history. It is only after the lockdowns were in effect that the excess mortality appeared. Excess deaths in Italy were hugely imbalanced towards the polluted north of the country and were likely substantially iatrogenic in nature.

Science didn’t inform Italy’s lockdown, it was the recommendation of the Chinese Communist Party. Previously unthinkable lockdowns that were inflicted on ostensibly democratic Italy opened the possibility for the rest of the supposed democratic world to follow. By April, more than half the world’s population (3.9 billion people) had been forced into lockdown.

It is clear that lockdowns had no real scientific justification and were pushed by people who were entirely aware of the inevitable devastating consequences. Lockdowns were guaranteed to kill millions of people and those pushing them already knew this.

Immediate deaths would occur as a result of denial of healthcare, others would take weeks, such as starvation in the developing world, and even more would die over the years to come, such as cancer deaths and the loss of services due to economic destruction. All of this was completely obvious to many people at the time.

“The world has been fighting a virus from China with a public health policy from China that transforms the world into China.” Michale Senger

It is clear that lockdowns always preceded excess mortality. Italy went into lockdown earlier than other countries, and its excess deaths came proportionately earlier too. At the other end of the scale, the UK instituted lockdowns last, and was the last to see a mortality spike.

The picture is similar in the US, where no excess deaths are apparent prior to lockdown, but a sudden spike comes immediately after.

Japan imposed border controls but did not mandate an internal lockdown. The country experienced no excess mortality in 2020, in spite of “case” numbers increasing. Excess deaths became apparent in 2022 only after a high proportion of the Japanese population was “vaccinated”. This is hard for lockdown advocates and proponents of the viral theory in general to explain.

The medical establishment systematically withdrew normal care for everyone and attacked doctors who refused to comply. In virtually the entire Western World, antibiotic prescriptions fell by approximately 50% of the pre-Covid rates. About half of all covid death certificates list bacterial pneumonia as a “comorbidity”.

The countries experiencing high excess mortality at this time were all actively isolating their elderly population and denying them medical care. Spanish soldiers who went into care homes found residents who had been abandoned dead in their beds. It was reported that in French care homes “bodies have been left decomposing in bedrooms”.

The sedative drug, midazolam used to treat covid actually produced the respiratory symptoms attributed to covid and was used in lethal doses. Vastly increased use of midazolam corresponds with the increase in UK excess mortality seen in 2020. There is also evidence for increased midazolam use in Italy and Sweden.

New York made extensive use of ventilators, which can cause fatal lung damage and are estimated to have killed tens of thousands of Americans unnecessarily. The toxic antiviral drug Remdesivir was also extensively used in the US, causing renal failure leading to pulmonary oedema which was then attributed to covid.

Masks have also caused immeasurable harm to individuals’ physical and mental health, caused conflict and division in society, and shamefully have disproportionately harmed young children in particular.

A group of concerned parents in Florida sent six masks to the University of Florida for analysis. The analysis found that five masks were contaminated with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, including three with pathogenic, pneumonia-causing bacteria. Inhaling bacteria, together with the low oxygen and high CO2 conditions caused by mask-wearing has undoubtedly caused many cases of bacterial pneumonia as was seen during the 1918 “flu” pandemic.

“It is not unreasonable to ask whether the logic has not been inverted: Is COVID-19-assignment an incorrect cause-assignment for what is in fact bacterial pneumonia?” Dr. Denis Rancourt

Mortality rates in Kansas counties with and without mask mandates were studied by Dr. Zacharias Fögen who concluded that:

“Results from this study strongly suggest that mask mandates actually caused about 1.5 times the number of deaths…compared to no mask mandates.”

The “vaccines” were first administered in December 2020 in the UK. This was presented as a triumphant event, and the increasingly nasty coercive rollout began.

Based on their dubious track record there was never any reason to trust the pharmaceutical companies or their captured regulators. Given the criminal records of the companies developing them, apparent problems with the trials, and record-breaking development time, prudent people should have been sceptical.

With billions of dollars at stake, there was every reason to be cynical regarding claims of both safety and efficacy. Sadly, many people were trusting and gave in to the coercive bullying.

An independent reanalysis of both the Pfizer and Moderna trials found a statistically significant serious adverse events rate in the “vaccine” groups.

There is an unprecedented safety signal apparent on the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the British Yellow Card system. Since their introduction the “vaccines” have contributed significantly to excess mortality everywhere they were imposed.

These injected toxin cocktails continue to cause death and serious adverse effects on a scale that the world has never before experienced. This has largely been met with a deafening silence from those that pushed the fake pandemic narrative.

Conclusions

The actions of governments around the world were malicious and harmful, costing many lives whilst not demonstrably saving any. There was no pandemic causing excess mortality, it was government-imposed measures that caused the excess mortality.

If there had been no pandemic propaganda or coercion, and governments and the medical establishment had just continued with business as usual, then there would not have been any excess mortality.

Division and nastiness infected our societies. Moral self-righteousness took a hold and there was hateful recrimination for anyone not going along with “the science”. We saw a rise in the kind of superstitious thinking that many of us thought had been left behind in the Middle Ages.

The covid psy-op and response was a full-scale multi-faceted state and iatrogenic attack against populations, and against societal support structures, which caused all the excess mortality, in every jurisdiction.

It is 5th generation warfare, and the war is not over yet.

https://expose-news.com/2023/08/04/pande...-pandemic/

Dr David Martin Changes His Mind: There Was No SARS Cov2 Disease, Just A Set Of Symptoms And A Branding Campaign

Which is what I said in the spring of 2020 and still say: THERE NEVER HAS BEEN A ‘COVID VIRUS’

Dr. David Martin has been championed as a guy who has shown proof that “SARS was research developed by humans in the lab at the University of North Carolina and then weaponised and released to attack humans.” Now though, he has said that there is “no disease it was a set of symptoms and a branding campaign” Simplified he says, it is a fake virus that was merely used to convince many people to get injected.

“They said (the perpetrators) they were going to make an event where the media hype would drive the public to demand a medical countermeasure called a vaccine, so for that the unambiguous nature of what this is, it was domestic and international terrorism it was collusion it was racketeering.” Says Martin.

Unfortunately, much of the health freedom movement have used his previous statements of an intentional “release” to lend credence to the lab-made virus idea, an idea that has caused many an argument against those who have never believed in its existence.

Therefore, Martin’s theory has potentially weakened the unity and divided the truth movement. Now it appears that Dr Martin, who at the very least insinuated there had been an “intentional release” has had a change of mind and says there was no disease!

Who is David Martin PhD?
For those who may not know who Dr Martin is. Dr. David Martin has been speaking about the origins of SARS since 2006, and has been able to give a historical timeline leading up to the alleged pandemic in 2020, and has been an integral voice for those seeking the truth about the plandemic who have tended to always find him knowledgeable and trustworthy.

As recently as May this year, Dr Martin was seen giving an address at the International Covid Summit 3 – Press Conference. During his presentation, where he argued that the COVID-19 pandemic, was a pre-meditated act of domestic terrorism which he stressed did not happen overnight.

In fact, it was “56 years in the making”, he claimed and argued that a biological weapons lab facility at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill received an exemption from the gain-of-function moratorium so that by 2016, with a journal article saying “SARS coronavirus is poised for human emergence – in 2016.”

This, claimed Dr Martin “was WIV-1., the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus One“, which was “Poised for human emergence in 2016 at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” and he continued, “that by 2017 and 2018, the following phrase entered into common parlance among the community,”

“There is going to be an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen. […]The operative word, obviously, in that phrase is the word “release.” Does that sound like a leak? Dr. Martin asks

“And, lo and behold, we got SARS-CoV-2 and four times in April of 2019 – seven months before the allegation of patient number one – four patent applications of Moderna were modified to include the term “accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen” Below is a slide from Dr. Martins presentation.

https://i0.wp.com/expose-news.com/wp-con...age-50.png

Did Dr. David Martin have a change of mind?

It would appear that the good doctor has either changed his mind or perhaps is now telling us what he always believed but was insinuating something else? As Dr. Martin revealed only last month that he had a new stance in his analysis of the plandemic in a conversation with Alec Zeck from THEWAYFWRD about the foundational so-called science that gave way for the entire plan of 2020 to begin.

It was a long conversation where Dr Martin and the host of a podcast Alec discuss and also disagree on many fundamental issues relating to virology, I will attempt to show the key parts of that discussion, however, the video link is at the bottom of the article.
Just A Few Key Points

SARS cov2 was a branding campaign.
They (perpetrators) were very clear to stipulate that there was no disease, it was a set of symptoms.
The vaccines were prepared well in advance of the pseudopandemic.
The last four years were a premeditated Act of Domestic and international terrorism.
It was actually a disease of numbers not a disease of anything.
The numbers were created using false positive test results from the fraudulent PCR tests.
This was propaganda and warfare.
Dr Martin claims his engagement with the propaganda Warfare was to show that the propagandists themselves had their own falsifiable evidence.

The host wasted no time in asking Dr Martin what his take was on SARS-cov2 and viruses in general and the answers given were quite a surprise.
SARS cov2 – The Branded Terror Campaign

Dr Martin went straight in with an important point, saying that

“there was no question in his mind that people who had every intention of disrupting and harming humanity and people who had every intention of building things that would ultimately toxify the environment to make human life more unattainable so that they could have greater control, used a series of biological weapons, creation efforts to create a branded Terror campaign.”

SAR cov1 Was Eradicated

However, he continues that “the Branded Terror campaign” was a campaign that had to include the term SARS cov2, it was a term that was necessary because they had declared SARS cov1 eradicated.“and it kind of sucks if you’re going to try to sell a fear narrative to go the thing that we said was eradicated his back because that would suggest that science that declared it eradicated was wrong and obviously you can’t do that if you’re trying to run a terror campaign” and

“SARS COV2 WAS A BRANDING CAMPAIGN CONDUCTED DURING THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY IN 2020.”
No Disease – A Set of Symptoms – A Branding Campaign.

Dr. Martin answered the question

“What was his take on the virus?” by revealing his new to us “theory” that “there was no disease, it was a set of symptoms!” and that “the International Committee on the Taxonomy of viruses (ICTV) were very clear to stipulate that! The ICTV had published their official brand on March the 2nd 2020″

Dr Martin says,

“it said that there was, quote, a “novel pathogen” that novel pathogen was going to be branded SARS cov2”. Martin continued, “so that we were, “ethnically” as you know, allegedly “ethnically sensitive” to the Chinese and that there was a, quote “disease” in their words, caused, in their words, by this “thing” they branded the disease covid-19,”

“But”, he argues,, “they were very clear to stipulate that there was no disease, it was a set of symptoms, and those symptoms were commonly associated with influenza-like illness and have been associated with influenza-like illness, for it’s an amalgamation of symptoms.”

“So, this idea that it was, quote a “novel disease” was a branding campaign.”
International Terrorism

Dr Martin then asks to stipulate again, “for the conversation”, that the entirety of the last foor years was a premeditated Act of Domestic and international terrorism, “And most importantly the perpetrators admitted to that very fact in 2015.”

“They said they were going to make an event where the media hype would drive the public to demand a medical countermeasure called a vaccine, so for that the unambiguous nature of what this is, it was domestic and international terrorism it was collusion it was racketeering.” Martin claims, adding that they actually “stipulated that they were going to commit the crime in 2015.” and “They executed the crime on schedule.”

The Viruses in General Question

What “we’re dealing with according to Dr Martin, “is a piece of terminology that has morphed since it was introduced in the 14th century” […] “insofar as virus means, in proto-Italian, means poison”

“do I believe there are poisons in the world? Martin asks, “The answer is unambiguous yes, and the reason is because I’ve had poisons injected into me and I know that the poisons had an effect which was the desired effect insofar as do we believe there are poisons? Absolutely there are and there’s no question that poisons are in fact sometimes accidental and sometimes intentionally introduced to cause incapacitation or death”.

Virus means Poison.

Dr Martin asks, “is there a microparticle coming up into the 18th century? is there a microparticle involved in the causation of disease that we then now rebrand? and by the way, once again it’s branding, we rebrand a virus and we then try through the cunning use of language to subtly replace the actual multi-century use of that term, which is poison”.

There is, for a causative agent of anything, the answer is absolutely, not causation which was invented in 1663 very specifically causation is an illusion of the intellectually lazy.

“The idea that we can identify out of the plurality of conditions in the universe every single factor that creates the condition giving rise to a thing is as hubris filled and delusional as the Council of Nicaea (the first council in the history of the Christian church) was in the 4th Century trying to pretend that they could take the infinite of the Divine and dictate in a couple paragraphs the sum total of what it meant to have religion.”

“This idea that we can be reductionist to the point of stupidity where we decide that we are going to pick the ontology and the frame in which we’re going to understand nature and then have the audacity of saying we’re going to get to causation is beyond the pale of idiocy.

He goes on to add a really important fact, which is undoubtedly happening today, but instead individuals are afraid of being vilified, struck off, losing their careers etc

“It’s important for people in this conversation understand that Gottfried Leibniz (1646 – 1716) in 1663 published his dissertation “which gave us modern regression” and was importantly, the same year as two important things happening. One of which was the conducting of heretic witch and heretic burning trials in Europe and also, Martin says, “the guy who wrote the fundamental mathematics behind which causation, regression is derived, was a Lutheran” and was being sponsored by Catholics in a town where people were being burnt for being Lutheran”

Motivation for Causality

“So let’s be abundantly clear”, he continues, “that there was a tiny motivation for a guy to come up with an explanation for causality which he was commissioned to do by Catholics so that he didn’t get himself burned at the stake by the exact same people who are paying him and if we actually understood that causal regression is the derivative of that and every single thing we call medicine and science right now is a direct derivative of a fallacy that was established and published in 1663” He adds, “if we understood that we’d be having a different conversation”

Alec Zeck then gets a rare word into the conversation (16:09) and asks

“so just to be clear here, so when we’re talking about a virus?” “I’m not talking about the previous definition of poison, I’m talking about a tiny replication-competent obligate intracellular parasite consisting of a genome surrounded by a protein coat that is an infectious particle”

Dr Martin extols

“ALL BULLSHIT, 100% bullshit”

The Danger That it Could be Repeated.

Dr. Martin has almost accounted for and excused his changed view, as he now has a “remit” “not to debate viruses” but to hold people accountable for criminal acts that they perpetrated on society”

“That’s my remit One of the criminal acts perpetrated on society was to invent a fake virus on acomputer. If people don’t understand the true nature of the crime there is a danger that it could be repeated.”

The vaccines are causing many inflammatory conditions and cases of turbo cancer. he says this is “what is actually in these vaccines and the mechanisms whereby these diseases are being caused is still debatable and unclear. What is clear is that they were deliberately designed to cause chronic illness and death.” and “Propaganda about a fake virus that could spread from person to person was used to convince many people to get injected.”

To Conclude

The above is just my opinion on what was just some of the important points that Dr Martin raised in this interview, however, he did offer lots more information that can be heard in the video below.

However, there is one area that may stand out to many of us and that is that Dr Martin,, is therefore supporting the idea that individuals do at times write or say things that they do not even believe themselves.

A few years ago, whilst studying, a wise lecturer, pulled me up for quoting classic thinkers and saying they “believed.” For example, I may have written “Voltaire believed that “Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities, has the power to make you commit injustices.” I had no idea if Voltaire actually “believed” this at all, I was told. This was true, of course, I didn’t.

This is something that has become increasingly obvious last three and a half years that just because an individual says something, even with conviction, it certainly does not mean they believe what they say.

Take Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla when he said 2 years ago that “there are no safety concerns’ about its vaccine,” he surely did not believe that if he had looked at Pfizer’s own trial data?

Anyway, one thing the plandemic era has taught us, is that, perhaps more than ever, we have observed ordinarily good people driving a ridiculous, harmful agenda and we can be sure there are going to be outside influences swaying the often biased arguments that they are presenting. We can be sure that these intelligent people do not honestly believe what they are saying. and many of us have lost trust in those we know are protecting their careers in favour over humanity.

Does David Martin PhD fall into this category? Has he been influenced previously to follow an agenda? If so, why are we now privvy to this, his new narrative, which is one that many of us believed to be true and argued for in the first place?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BHxfuOSc9Y

https://www.truth11.com/untitled-1205/

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e....36-AM.png

https://rielpolitik.files.wordpress.com/...age-20.png

Leftists Showed Their True Authoritarian Colors During Covid

Authored by Brandon Smith

When I think back to the first days of the covid pandemic lockdowns, I suspect the majority of people, even many conservatives and liberty movement types, had a healthy concern about the effects of the virus and the potential for structural upheaval if it turned out to be as deadly as the World Health Organization initially claimed. If covid had an Infection Fatality Rate of 3% or more as global health officials warned, then the damage would be substantial enough to change our world for many years to come.

Anyone who was not at least partially concerned about a biological disaster (or biological warfare) was probably an idiot. Anyone who was smart was prepared. However, after a few months of the spread of the virus and after the first flurry of scientific data, several facts became evident:

1) The lockdowns did nothing to stop the spread, they were simply destroying our economy.

2) The masks were useless and did nothing to prevent transmission of the virus.

3) The IFR of covid was a tiny 0.23%, and that’s not accounting for all the co-morbidity deaths that were falsely labeled as covid deaths.

4) The vaccines did not prevent transmission for millions of people. They did not prevent infection in many cases and numerous vaccinated people have died from the virus. Not only that, but unvaccinated people with natural immunity were better protected than those that took the vaccine and boosters.

5) Studies show that the vaccines cause dangerous side effects at a much greater rate than the CDC admitted.

Everything government officials told us during the pandemic was a lie. It was not a mistake, it was not bureaucratic confusion, it was a lie. Even after this information became available, they KEPT GOING – They kept people locked down, kept them masked and they even tried to force-vaccinate the population. There were some Republican politicians that also went along with the panic, many of them Neocons (fake conservatives). However, the majority of red states quickly ended the restrictions once the contradictory data was made public. In the meantime, the blue states looked ridiculous and paranoid as they desperately clung to the mandates.

I believe the only reason Biden, the Democrats and globalist institutions eventually stopped was not because they realized their science was incorrect; it was because they realized millions of conservatives and independents were ready start a shooting war over the mandates and they knew they would lose.

Even today, months after Biden was forced to finally end the national emergency status on covid, there are still a lot of people out there running around with masks, still isolating in their homes and still complaining all over social media that the public has moved on from the pandemic hysteria. Where does this behavior originate? And why did so many Americans (mainly leftists) jump on the authoritarian bandwagon when it comes to lockdowns and forced vaccination?

I want to explore the psychology of such people here, because I think it’s the natural inclination of the public today to move on quickly from the discomfort of terrible events and ignore the deeper implications. We cannot move on from this, because the ultimate problem was never solved. These same leftists and globalists were never admonished for their behavior, they never had to admit they were wrong and they WILL attempt the same draconian measures again in the future if left unchecked.

Here is what I think happened during the covid cult frenzy…

A Useful Weapon Against The Constitution
Leftists are quick these days to change the subject or outright deny their authoritarian activities during covid. It makes sense, they view the next election as a defining election and they want people to forget that we almost lost what remains of our constitutional rights because of their policies. But again, we can’t allow these things to fade into the ether. Here’s a list of the worst trespasses on the part of leftists and globalists during the pandemic:

They lied about the effectiveness of the lockdowns.

They lied about the effectiveness of the masks.

They lied about the effectiveness of the vaccines.

They lied about how extensive the testing was for the covid vaccines.

They lied about the “pandemic of the unvaccinated.”

They enforced lockdowns OUTSIDE where it is nearly impossible to contract a virus.

They tried to put the population under house arrest.

They put legislation in motion in some states to build “covid camps” in the US.

In some countries, they did build covid camps, not just for travelers, but for everyone.

They conspired to suppress ample evidence linking the Wuhan Lab in China with the outbreak.

They (Government and Big Tech) conspired to use social media as a tool for mass censorship of conflicting data.

They exploited algorithms through search engines to bury any and all contrary information.

As many leftists openly admitted, the goal was to make life so difficult for the unvaccinated that they would eventually comply in order to survive. In this way, establishment elites and leftists could claim that people “volunteered” for the vaccines and no one was forced. What they really meant was, no one was forced at gunpoint, but we all knew that threat was coming next. In fact, polling showed that a large percentage of Democrats were willing to scrap the Bill of Rights altogether and declare war on the unvaccinated…

Finally, the vast majority of leftists supported Biden’s vaccine passport executive orders for workers in companies with 100 employees or more, which would have ultimately led to vaccine passports for everyone. This would have destroyed the constitution as we know it and created a society in which economic participation is completely controlled by the government. Keep in mind, all of this was being justified by a virus with a tiny 0.23% median death rate.

Since the political left views the Bill of Rights as an obstacle to the majority of their political goals, I argue that they simply saw the pandemic as a vehicle they could exploit to remove constitutional protections they always wanted to get rid of anyway.

The Mentally Ill Took Over The Country
Around 23% of the US population is estimated to have at least one mental illness. On average, around 3% of the population suffers from psychotic episodes and 1% of the population is full blown psychopathic (incapable of empathy and takes joy in the suffering of others). America is a sick nation full of psychologically disturbed people, and there is currently no recourse for fixing the problem.

Instead, under the leftist methodology, the mentally ill are elevated, idolized and enabled while violent criminals are released onto the streets over and over again. Take one look at all the major cities on the west coast of the US where progressive policies rule and see the disturbing decline. But what does this have to do with medical tyranny under covid?

The political left uses the mentally ill as a bludgeon, an easily manipulated tool for chaos. During the lockdowns and restrictions the establishment and the media stoked the fires of paranoia. By themselves they have no power; they need the crazed mob as a weapon to keep the rest of the country afraid and in line. They needed good little Stasi, always watching, always correcting, always screaming at those without masks, attacking those that refused to get vaxxed and mocking those that spoke out about scientific inconsistencies.

And, in return, the establishment made the mentally ill feel as if they were normal. For a fleeting moment in time, the most unstable and narcissistic people on the planet were made to feel like THEY were on the right side of history and rationality. It was a parasitic feedback loop that almost destroyed the last vestiges of America.

Tiny Tyrants Begging For Scraps From The Globalist Table
There are generally two kinds of people in the world – Those that want power over others, and those that just want to be left alone. The progressive ideology seems to be a breeding ground for “tiny tyrants”: People who have no individual power, little accomplishment and no influence to speak of, but are still stricken with an obsession to micromanage the world around them. These folks see crisis and government overreach as an opportunity rather than a threat.

There are also those people who view their existence as so devoid of interest or excitement that they tend to live vicariously through calamity and conflict. They saw the covid outbreak and the lockdowns as a moment that gave their lives “meaning.” Yes, it’s sad and pathetic, but this is how many people out there cope with obscurity and lack of merit.

These opportunists didn’t want the pandemic to end. They wanted it to go on forever, because if it did they could feed off the establishment power shift. They could gather scraps from the globalist table, and like carrion, feast on the corpse of our Republic. The motive? Selfish vanity, that is all.

All of this could very well happen again. The big tyrants and tiny tyrants are still out there, waiting for the next crisis; the next panic event to take the public off their guard. Another viral event is unlikely, but they do seem anxious to use climate change, war and economic turmoil as the next great “reset” button. In the end, there will have to be a dramatic shift in how the liberty minded interact with the authoritarian left. It is clear that we cannot share the same country, or the same civilization. Our values are fundamentally at odds. It’s only a matter of time before a single spark ignites a firestorm

https://alt-market.us/never-forget-lefti...ing-covid/

The Cult Dynamics Of 2020
https://rumble.com/v35ycds-the-cult-dyna...-2020.html

Viruses do not exist & Electrohypersensitivity as a Newly Identified Neurologic Disorder PDF's
https://rumble.com/v36m0wx-viruses-do-no...-neur.html
The placebo and nocebo effect are scientifically proven and 91 studies show naturally acquired immunity is much better and may last a lifetime.
Blocking naturally acquired immunity with the measures is mass murder, democide.

Alex Jones breaks down how more and more leaders in politics, business, and healthcare across the world are beginning to publicly acknowledge that the COVID-19 pandemic was actually an orchestrated takeover by the globalist elite and the experimental shots are killing and maiming far more people than previously realized.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/sunday-li...operation/