06-25-2021, 02:56 PM
This Just In: "Starving Children Would Be More Uncommon If Starving Adults Would Stop fu*king" (debarelli.com)
Drs. Reiner Füllmich and Michael Yeadon Join Forces In Exposing Crimes Against Humanity (debarelli.com)
The Elites Want You To Believe That They Are Supernatural And/Or Superhuman. THEY ARE NOT. (debarelli.com)
While They Cry Out In Pain, They're Murdering Us In Our Own Lands (debarelli.com)
AUSTRALIAN SHITPOSTING CORPORATION: News Media For The First Time Ever Let The Truth Slip Out (debarelli.com)
Covid-19: The Great Reset, "You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy" - Klaus Schwab World Economic Forum (debarelli.com)
U.S.S. Liberty Anniversary - June 8, 1967 - We Are Not Going To War Over A Bunch Of Dead Sailors (debarelli.com)
"THEY" ARE AFTER YOUR KIDS: UNICEF Report Says Pornography Not Always Harmful To Children (debarelli.com)
The American People Did Not Want To Go To War With Germany. The Controlled Government Did. (debarelli.com)
"Don't You Understand? They Want Your Kids You Stupid C*nts". (debarelli.com)
Who at the BBC gave the 'Ok' for this curious headline to be published? What would be the purpose and/or intention of publishing and then removing such an inflammatory article? Where is the BBC trying to lead its impressionable reader/viewership? When was this article first posted and when was it removed? Why would the BBC post such a defamatory headline in the first place? How has this flown under the radar of the other mainstream media news outlets, escaped the news cycle, and the social media hyenas?
We have to ask ourselves what BBC's motives are since what is posted on the internet (even for a flash of a moment) is forever.
Here's the problem. Did you spot it? Did you even take the time to look into this further or did you allow yourself to be enthralled by it? I expect more out of you.
Based on the fact that the BBC tends to include a time stamp and/or date stamp on their news posts, I cannot look passed that. I have to conclude that this is bullshit.
The only possible exception to that finding is if the instant Live BBC article posts as a standard operating procedure lack that information. So, if the BBC posts "Live" articles that do not indicate something to the effect of "now" or "happening right now", then we can entertain this character of sensationalism. There's no point in looking any further. Stay tuned.
In the mean time, I admonish you MF'ers to GET A HOLD OF YOURSELVES. M'kay?
https://www.debarelli.com/post/bbc-headl...ly-removed
Drs. Reiner Füllmich and Michael Yeadon Join Forces In Exposing Crimes Against Humanity (debarelli.com)
The Elites Want You To Believe That They Are Supernatural And/Or Superhuman. THEY ARE NOT. (debarelli.com)
While They Cry Out In Pain, They're Murdering Us In Our Own Lands (debarelli.com)
AUSTRALIAN SHITPOSTING CORPORATION: News Media For The First Time Ever Let The Truth Slip Out (debarelli.com)
Covid-19: The Great Reset, "You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy" - Klaus Schwab World Economic Forum (debarelli.com)
U.S.S. Liberty Anniversary - June 8, 1967 - We Are Not Going To War Over A Bunch Of Dead Sailors (debarelli.com)
"THEY" ARE AFTER YOUR KIDS: UNICEF Report Says Pornography Not Always Harmful To Children (debarelli.com)
The American People Did Not Want To Go To War With Germany. The Controlled Government Did. (debarelli.com)
"Don't You Understand? They Want Your Kids You Stupid C*nts". (debarelli.com)
Who at the BBC gave the 'Ok' for this curious headline to be published? What would be the purpose and/or intention of publishing and then removing such an inflammatory article? Where is the BBC trying to lead its impressionable reader/viewership? When was this article first posted and when was it removed? Why would the BBC post such a defamatory headline in the first place? How has this flown under the radar of the other mainstream media news outlets, escaped the news cycle, and the social media hyenas?
We have to ask ourselves what BBC's motives are since what is posted on the internet (even for a flash of a moment) is forever.
Here's the problem. Did you spot it? Did you even take the time to look into this further or did you allow yourself to be enthralled by it? I expect more out of you.
Based on the fact that the BBC tends to include a time stamp and/or date stamp on their news posts, I cannot look passed that. I have to conclude that this is bullshit.
The only possible exception to that finding is if the instant Live BBC article posts as a standard operating procedure lack that information. So, if the BBC posts "Live" articles that do not indicate something to the effect of "now" or "happening right now", then we can entertain this character of sensationalism. There's no point in looking any further. Stay tuned.
In the mean time, I admonish you MF'ers to GET A HOLD OF YOURSELVES. M'kay?
https://www.debarelli.com/post/bbc-headl...ly-removed
