01-26-2022, 04:36 AM
Toxic vaccine batch numbers - howbad.info
https://howbad.info/
https://howbad.info/incremental.pdf
https://howbad.info/deathbylottery.pdf
https://howbad.info/moderna20A21A.pdf
https://howbad.info/modernatoxicity.pdf
https://howbad.info/pfizertoxicity.pdf
https://hillmd.substack.com/p/vaccine-ba...n-toxicity
https://needtoknow.news/2021/12/scientis...tch-app-2/
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/breakin...rculation/
https://rielpolitik.com/2021/11/13/cover...ment-data/
https://rielpolitik.com/2021/12/23/cover...e-whitney/
https://truth11.com/2022/01/14/pfizer-fd...-genocide/
https://truth11.com/2022/01/14/video-rei...d-to-kill/
https://rielpolitik.com/2022/01/25/cover...f-vaccine/
https://howbad.info/
https://howbad.info/incremental.pdf
https://howbad.info/deathbylottery.pdf
https://howbad.info/moderna20A21A.pdf
https://howbad.info/modernatoxicity.pdf
https://howbad.info/pfizertoxicity.pdf
https://hillmd.substack.com/p/vaccine-ba...n-toxicity
https://needtoknow.news/2021/12/scientis...tch-app-2/
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/breakin...rculation/
https://rielpolitik.com/2021/11/13/cover...ment-data/
https://rielpolitik.com/2021/12/23/cover...e-whitney/
https://truth11.com/2022/01/14/pfizer-fd...-genocide/
https://truth11.com/2022/01/14/video-rei...d-to-kill/
https://rielpolitik.com/2022/01/25/cover...f-vaccine/
Quote:https://www.bitchute.com/embed/g62gcjrOuOyu
The most toxic Covid vax batch numbers end in 20A or 21A
This does not mean the others are OK, it just means that those two are the ones that make people complain. But
based on Britain's stats, they are ALL bad. Just some are (a lot) worse than others, to such an extent they look like
they are probably outright weapons given to "the right people".
Since there are now known to be 3 different vax variants one for politicians and "elite", one for general nobodies,
and one for "bad people", it is probably safe to assume that you can delete 2/3 of the vaxxes from the column he
shows and conclude that your personal chance of getting a bad one are much much higher than it looks on screen.
The killer batches are probably produced in higher numbers than the rest of the batches
Quote:UK Scientist Reveals Bombshell Data Analysis: Tracks Batches Of Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen, Finds “..Some Batches Are 50 Times Worse Than Others”
I was told about the work of Craig Paardekooper by my friend of many years, PhD bio-chemist Dr. Dave Rasnick a few days ago; Today came this email from Dave, clarifying his shocking findings:
“ I’m following the very important work of Craig Paardekooper at Kingston University London. Recently, I introduced Craig’s work to our email group.
Three of his conclusions:
The companies purposely manufactured non-uniform formulations of their vaccines while representing to the public that all COVID-19 vaccines from a given manufacturer were uniform in their formulation.
Over 20,000 different batches (lots) of Pfizer, Moderna, J & J injections total.
1 in 200 lots contain deadly ingredients. He urged me to watch a series of videos, in which he lays out the unthinkable. One video here:
Another, “Death By Alphabet: Moderna Batch Codes And Associated Deaths:” here
“Please share with those you know, and also with doctors, nurses and teachers – who may soon be pushing the vax onto children. Doctors and nurses need to see that some batches are 50 x worse than others – before they prescribe them.”
Quote:How Bad is My Batch Are some batches more toxic than others?
Batch codes and associated deaths, disabilities and illnesses for Covid 19 Vaccines
home | Booster Warnings by Month | Moderna | Pfizer | Janssen | Moderna (outside USA) | Pfizer (outside USA) | Janssen (outside USA) | Severe | Lethal | Size Matters | Time till onset | Causality | All or Nothing | Clusters | Lot Sizes | Lot Expiry Dates | Data Cleaning | Symptom | Paralysis | Children | Gender | States | Geography | Japan | Sweden | Case Reports | Whistle Blowers | Video Library | Treatment | Background | Download Source Code | Donate
This site may slow down due to high traffic. A backup site has been created - HowBadisMyBatch.com to reduce overload Thankyou.
!! NEW : A Study of Paralysis Following C19 Vaccination. See Paralysis
!! NEW : C19 Vax vs Flu Vax. See C19 v Flu
!! NEW : Size matters - how injuries increase in direct proportion to numbers vaccinated - a causal link. See Size Matters
!! NEW : Vaccine injury / death differs by state. See States
!! NEW : Lot expiry list reveals which lots are biologically active vs placebo. See Lot Expiry Dates page.
!! NEW : Gender differences in response to vaccine. See Gender
!! NEW : Revelations from Sweden See Sweden
!! NEW : Documents submitted "People vs MHRA" See Prosecution docs
!! NEW : Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA technology, talks about his vaccine injury.
Some batches/lots are associated with excessive deaths, disabilities and adverse reactions. This variation could be due to -
variation in the amount, meaning the number of doses distributed for a particular lot, OR
variation in the toxicity of the doses
Both factors may play a part. Until we know for certain, it is best to be cautious.
You can use this website to find out the number of deaths, disabilities and illnesses associated with your particular batch code. The sheer number of deaths and disabilities is cause for concern - far exceeding the adverse events associated with flu vaccine lots of equal size.
Check out your batch code (lot number)
Moderna Batch Codes
Pfizer Batch Codes
Janssen Batch Codes
Moderna (outside of USA)
Pfizer (outside of USA)
Janssen (outside of USA)
Latest Info on Boosters
Bad Batches of the Month
Variation in Toxicity
Interview with Craig Paardekooper on C-VAR
C19 Vax vs Flu Vax
% Severity varies between Moderna Lots
% Severity varies between Pfizer Lots
Cumulative Toxicity over Time PDF
VIDEO : Variation in Toxicity between Batches
Death by Lottery PDF
VIDEO : Non-GMP Compliant Batches Associated with Death and Disability
VIDEO : Team Enigma - Covid Vax Variability
VIDEO : VAERS reveals super-toxic batches
Do the Batch Codes Code for Toxicity?
Moderna's 20A-21A Classification of Toxicity for Covid Vaccines PDF
Moderna : Alphabetic Labelling of Different Toxicities PDF
Pfizer : Alphabetic Labelling of Different Toxicities PDF
VIDEO : Do Pfizer Batch Numbers Code for Toxicity Part 1 ?
VIDEO : Do Pfizer Batch Numbers Code for Toxicity Part 2 ?
VIDEO : Do Moderna Batch Numbers Code for Toxicity ?
VAERS Database
Covid Science Library
Medical doctors talking about VAERS
VaersAnalysis.info
Data Source
USA Data : All data is sourced from VAERS, a public database of over 700,000 adverse reaction reports for Moderna, Pfizer and Janssen Covid 19 vaccines in the USA.
Foreign Data : VAERS database now also includes data for Moderna, Pfizer and Janssen Covid 19 vaccines in countries outside of the USA. This data can be found here - Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) - the last table listed. This non-domestic data has been submitted by foreign regulatory agencies and consists of approximately 1,000,000 adverse reaction reports.
Our intention is to present the VAERS data in an accessible and unadulterated form, that can be easily verified using the links below
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
Video Tutorial 1 : Extracting Bad Batch Data from VAERS - Deaths, Disabilities, Hospitalisations
Extracting non-domestic data from VAERS - the steps I took
Quote:On page 3 is a table showing
• Column 1 : Moderna batch numbers
• Column 2 : Number of adverse reaction reports for each batch
Column 2 is ordered largest first
1. Notice that all the most toxic Moderna batches end with the letters 20A. These batches have a toxicity from
1780 – 5000 x the mean
2. Below the 1780x toxicity level, there is an ABRUPT change in Moderna batch codes – they end with 21A
instead.
What this looks like
It looks as if the most toxic batches all received a specific code within their batch numbers – all of the Moderna
batches above the orange line are in excess of 1780 x toxicity, and their batch numbers end in the letters 20A.
29 different batches were deployed within this range of toxicity by Moderna.
The majority of toxic batches below this line – in the toxicity range 100-1700x have batch numbers ending in the
letters 21A
Observations
THE BATCHES RANKED MOST TOXIC FROM 1 TO 29
28 out of the 29 most toxic Moderna batches end in 20A
The exception ends in 20-2A which just happens to be very similar to 20A
These batches all have a toxicity in the range 1780 - 4985 x
THE BATCHES RANKED MOST TOXIC FROM 30 TO 59
23 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 21A
7 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 20A
These batches have a range of toxicity of 1237 - 1767 x
THE BATCHES RANKED MOST TOXIC FROM 60 TO 89
25 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 21A
4 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 20A
1 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches ends in 21B
These batches have a toxicity range of 894 - 1215 x
THE BATCHES RANKED MOST TOXIC FROM 90 TO 119
28 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 21A
1 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches ends in 20A
1 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches ends in 20 -2A
These batches have a toxicity range of 568 to 889
THE BATCHES RANKED MOST TOXIC FROM 120 TO 149
27 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 21A
2 end in 20-2A
1 ends in 93902
These batches have a toxicity range of 321-566 x
THE BATCHES RANKED MOST TOXIC FROM 150-179
20 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 21A
1 batch ends in 21-2A
1 batch ends in 93906
1 batch ends in 93901
3 batches are unknown
These batches have a toxicity in the range 121-297x
Quote:Many are wondering why some geographic areas, such as those surrounding Silicon Valley are not seeing nearly as many adverse reactions to the vaxx as other areas, with Prudential reporting a 87% increase in death benefits paid out in the third quarter of 2021, compared the third quarter of 2020. Pacific Life and Annuity is reporting that claims are up by over 80% and other insurers reporting increases of between 12% and 40%.
According to Dr Jane Ruby, we the people of Planet Earth are being subjected to mass unethical drug testing, without informed consent, against all ethical and regulatory rules; tests that are supposed to be reserved for rats and mice.
ATTACK ON AMERICA: COMPANIES INTENTIONALLY DEPLOYING TOXIC BATCHES
Dr Ruby joins Stew Peters to relay how she spent 3 hours with researchers who have been painstakingly identifying the lot numbers of the most deadly vials that are now in circulation.
She says that hackers were able to break into the systems of Pfizer and Moderna and the researchers were able to put together a comprehensive list of all the lots and the code numbers of the most toxic batches.
According to the hackers, 5% of the batches have generated the 21,000 deaths reported to VAERS.
She says that in the Moderna analysis, the death rate in the United States was 10 times higher than in the EU and that the EU had ten times more disabilities, as compared with the US. She says that it is clear that this was by design.
She says they’re not testing doses within the therapeutic range, they’re testing lethal doses. She says she will be coming back with a more in-depth report but says, “Before you let your child get in line for these bioweapon shots, if you don’t believe anything we’ve said, at least ask them for the lot numbers.” The lot numbers can then be checked on the researchers’ website, HowBad.Info.
Dr Ruby says, “What they’re telling us is that this is a worldwide human experiment, it’s intentional and there’s a subplot to this; that there is an attack on the American People.
“What they basically told me is that all three companies, Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson – which is essentially Janssen – are testing. They’re actively testing and it’s worse than we thought, because there’s evidence that these companies are intentionally deploying toxic batches.
“They’ve also identified what they call ‘super toxic’ batches and they’ve released these lot numbers. And I felt like this was an emergency to get this to the American People and the people of the world.
“I want to show you what they found, in terms of most dangerous lots. And when we’re done with this segment, I urge everyone to go to HowBad.Info, where you can check the lots and you can know which lots are deadly and dangerous if you’re thinking or on the fence about getting any of these bioweapon injections.
“When you look at the first column here, for Pfizer, I want you to know that the most deadly, dangerous lot [for children] will begin with ‘EW’. Second to that is ‘FA’ and then ‘FC’…
“The most harmful lot for children, under this EW, FA, FC…the whole lot number is: EW0182 but you can go to HowBad.Info and look up the company and put your lot number in.
“Under Pfizer for adults, the most toxic, deadly batches begin with ‘EN’ and then, second to that is ‘ER’…
“Under Moderna [all ages]…their toxic, deadly batches end in ’20A’.
“Their ‘supertoxic’, under Moderna, have in the middle section – they got very clever…all companies coded their lot numbers so that they would know where the most toxic batches are and I’m going to share with you why that’s important in a little bit.
“But Moderna took it a step further, with a little cleverness, because they embedded their code for their most toxic amount, either in dose or chemical composition under the letters in the middle of that lot number, J, K, L, M.
“The analysts were a team that included the well-known [former Pfizer VP] Dr Michael Yeadon, Craig Partikooper from Africa, a woman named Alexandra Ladipova, who’s in California, our well-known Jessica Rose, who we’ve interviewed on the Stew Peters Show before and another analyst named Walter Wagner.
“Look, this ‘EW’ lot for children – anything that starts with ‘EW’ is responsible for almost all adverse events in children, all ER visits, all hospitalizations, all life-threatening events, disabilities and all deaths.
“This is serious. And here’s the kicker, Stew: All of these deadly lots that we’re going to show you are all already in circulation, remembering that there could be up to 1.5 million doses per lot. This quantification is set by each company. And the way they know that is because they have looked at the companies and they’ve gotten into their systems to see how the companies have laid this out.
“They made the assertion, Stew – and this was shocking – that what these companies are doing is they’re exporting ‘disability’, as defined by the VAERS system, itself out to Europe; ex-USA. And what they’re doing is they’re exporting, if you will, death. More death, more lethal doses in the United States.
LETHAL DOSE STUDIES WITHOUT INFORMED CONSENT
“Now, let me share with everyone – there’s another chart with a scatter plot, it’s called ‘Pfizer Batches’. And when Pfizer batches were arranged alphanumerically along the X axis, the following patterns emerged. And you can see these dots, these vertical dots represent batch numbers.
“And again, there’s that ‘EW’, you can see the green stack of dots. Those are children’s doses. Even though the company claims that the amount is less than the adult dose, supposedly, we have no idea what’s in there…
“They are conducting what we call ‘lethal dose studies’. Now, in pharmaceutical drug development, lethal dose studies look at how much you need to cause death and obviously, they’re not done in humans, in people. They’re always done in animals, though they’ve slowed down in recent years, because people have become concerned. Even though they’re rats and mice; they’re ‘lower forms’, people are concerned about the cruelty to animals. But they’re never done in people.
“And what’s happening here is they are basically, from the analysis, these analysts tell us that these three companies are actively, right now conducting lethal dose studies.
“Let me explain ‘lethal dose’. They take the highest amount of chemical, in terms of dosage and chemical and what they do is that they determine what lethal amount to test half the population.
It’s one of the means to assess acute toxicity prior to going into human studies. And like I aid, it has been largely phased-out. They are conducting it without informed consent, it’s against all ethical and regulatory rules. In other words, we believe these companies are just proceeding with impunity, because there is nothing stopping them.
SIGNIFICANCE OF NUMBERS IN BATCH CODES
“I want to also show people something – before we get into a larger look at the lots and what’s happening and how these analysts are so sure that this is not by randomization, that this is not by chance, I want to take a look at the parts of a Moderna batch code.
“I mentioned earlier that Moderna got a little ore complex and clever. Remember, these companies, we now know are actually embedding into their lots a code to tell THEM which lots are toxic, which ones are causing disabilities and what types of disabilities! This is absolutely outrageous!
“When you look at the parts of a Moderna batch code, you see ‘011’, the letter ‘L’, and ’20A’.
“’20A’, as we mentioned before, in the first chart I showed…denotes the most lethal batch of lot codes in the Moderna program right now. And remember, all of these numbers I’m going to show you are from the middle of November, all the way up until s late as December 16, just a couple of weeks ago.
“So when you look at this number, 011-L-20A, what you’re looking at in the ‘011’ is the temporal batch order; so how it’s being developed over time and deployed by the company.
“The ‘L’ is the concentration. It tells he company the toxicity and number of adverse reactions.
“And then, the ’20A’ is qualitative; it’s the ingredient. And either ’20A’, which was the most toxic of their batch lots or ’21A’ came up, as well.
“So this is their clever scheme…The reason they’re not concerned with safety issues is because this is an a priori design. This is designed ahead of time to send out toxic batches and then, to gather their information.”
PROFESSIONAL HACKERS GOT INTO PFIZER & MODERNA
Dr Ruby explains that professional hackers got into Pfizer and Moderna’s systems and they were able to verify the whole lots. Dr Partikooper has a list of all the Moderna batches deployed so far. And Moderna also has a web tool for checking the expiration dates for the batches and these computer guys hacked into the Moderna and Pfizer websites and got entire lists of all their batches and batch code numbers.
She says, “I just want to make something very clear: This exporting death to the USA and disability to the EU, what they found, for example, in the Moderna analysis. There was ten times the death rate in the United States than in the EU and in the Moderna group, there were ten times more disabilities in the EU group compared with the USA.”
Dr Ruby says they’re clearly not testing doses within the therapeutic range, they’re testing lethal doses. She says she will be coming back with a more in-depth report and says, “Before you let your child get in line for these bioweapon shots, if you don’t believe anything we’ve said, at least ask them for the lot numbers.”
-
In the pharmaceutical world of economic durable competitive advantages, having a patent on a best-selling drug is about as good as it gets. The next best thing is having a monopoly on selling a country’s national health program the vaccines it needs for its childhood inoculation programs.Both of these businesses are hugely profitable and GSK excels in both these categories.
The vaccine business is particularly attractive because an individual shot (or jab) costs GSK approximately 1.50 USD to manufacture and it sells to national vaccine programs for approximately 9USD a shot. That gives GSK a net profit of approximately 7.50 USD a shot. This markup gives GSK a very healthy profit margin that improves with and every new disease that the company develops a vaccine for. Consider this: GSK’s profits rose 10% with the 2009 Swine Flu outbreak – a disease for which the company had a state-of-the-art vaccine ready to inoculate the masses.
In addition to its patents and the durable competitive advantage GSK has with the vaccines, it also established the relationship with the world’s governments, and it has the financial capital to create, manufacture and sell vaccines on a world scale. If you were in charge of the health of a nation’s 30 million-plus children, who would you buy your vaccines from? Every year? Year after year? You’d pick the biggest and the best. There are only four pharmaceutical giants that control most of the vaccine production in the world and GSK is one of them.
There is another component to the vaccine equation that also spells BIG MONEY: Every year, women all over the world give birth to approximately 133 million new babies, 4.3 million in the US alone. With the United States Centers for Disease Control recommending that children aged birth through six receive thirty four individual vaccine shots/jabs, that means the market for those thirty-four vaccine shots/jabs increases every year by 4.3 million in just the US alone. This in turn means that the vaccine manufacturers selling in the U.S. have the potential to earn a profit of 1.09 billion USD every year. (4.3 million x 34 x 7.50USD = 1.09 billion). Consider the number of yearly vaccines worldwide and the numbers are staggering – approximately 34 billion a year (133 million x 34 x 7.5 = 33.9 billion USD). After ten years, in the U.S. alone vaccine manufacturers will see more than 10 billion USD in net profit. On a world scale, the number jumps to a potential 340 billion USD in profits.
And wait, it gets even better. With the invention of each new vaccine comes a patent that is good for twenty years and guarantees that no one else can make the vaccine. In other words, the company has a monopoly.
And wait, it gets even better. With the invention of each new vaccine comes a patent that is good for twenty years and guarantees that no one else can make the vaccine. In other words, the company has a monopoly.
And last but not least, vaccine manufacturers in the U.S. are completely immune from lawsuits. Back in the 1980s several bad batches of vaccines injured so many children that the resulting successful lawsuits threatened to bankrupt the manufacturers, so the manufacturers lobbied a bill through Congress making them a protected class.
Quote:Death by Lottery - 5% of V Batches are Highly Toxic
a summary by Craig Paardekooper
Definition
The toxicity of a batch is defined by the number of deaths and adverse reactions associated with it’s
batch number, as recorded in the VAERS system.
Some time back in April I posted this idea
- https://web.facebook.com/groups/352273635911627/search/...
namely that -
"When an adverse reaction occurs too frequently for it to be chance, then people begin to see a
significant connection. So the government strategy is to keep the perceived occurrence below the level
of significance. With thousands becoming seriously ill after the V in plain sight of their relatives, the
only way to lower the perceived frequency is to make out that they are the only ones – that they are
the unfortunate few.
The same strategy was used during the war. The Allies had decoded ENIGMA and knew the location
and movements of all the U-boats. But they could not attack all of them, because then the Germans
would know that Enigma had been cracked. Instead they had to keep the frequency of attack below
the level of significance – often leaving a U-boat alone, even when that U boat would subsequently
attack an allied ship.
In the same way, the perceived frequency of adverse reactions to the V must be kept low, so that the
public remain barely aware that each attack of illness is by design.
Such a strategy could be implemented by varying batches, so only 7% receive a toxic V during each V
round – the remainder receiving a placebo. 7 % is very close to the 5% significance level. If 2 V rounds
occur each year, then after 7 years the mortality will be 7 x 2 x 7 = 98% - almost total depopulation."
Now, as it turns out, an in depth analysis of frequency of adverse reactions as they relate to different
batches of the V has been carried out. And they have found that 5% of the batches are extremely toxic,
whilst the remaining 95% are only mildly toxic.
For Pf-izer
96% of lots produced 0 deaths;
4% of lots accounted for all the deaths.
For Mode-rna
95% of lots produced 0 deaths
5% of lots accounted for all the deaths
It is found that the frequency of adverse reactions for all the batches cluster into two distinct groups – two
completely distinct distributions – whereby one group has an average that is 500 times greater than the
other group, and the extremes of the distribution do not overlap.
It has also been found that the number of adverse reactions per lot for the Pfizer and Moderna Vs has a
100 fold greater range than the number of adverse reactions per lot for the flu vax
Flu V
Range of Number of adverse reactions per lot 1-26
Pf-izer V
Range of Number of adverse reactions per lot 1-3563
Mode-rna V
Range of Number of adverse reactions per lot 1-4967
Furthermore, it has been found that the highly toxic batches were distributed to all states/regions of a
country, whereas the low-toxic batches are generally distributed to just one or two regions - the
differences in distribution are strongly significant.
2.9% of Pf-izer lots distributed to more than 12 states
and account for 96.5% of all the deaths
and account for 95.5% of all hospitalisations
and account for 94.7% of all adverse event reports
97.1% of Pf-izer lots were distributed to less than 12 states
and account for 3.5% of all the deaths
and account for 4.5% of all hospitalisations
and account for 5.3% of all adverse event reports
Summary
These data support the contention that batches /lots of two different toxicities are being rolled out. 5% of
the batches / lots are highly toxic and account for 95% of all fatalities and injuries. These batches are being
widely distributed to more than l2 regions of a country.
Conversely, 95% of the batches are of a lower toxicity, and account for only 5% of fatalities and injuries.
Each of these batches is distributed to less than 12 regions of a country – typically 1 or 2 states.
Conclusion
Deaths are frequently attributed to old age or co-morbidities, rather than to the V. If this were the case
then there should be no significant difference in adverse effects between batches - since the V should have
no effect on the adverse reaction frequency.
However, in reality what we find is that adverse reactions are strongly determined by particular batches.
What is more, these highly toxic batches appear to have been deliberately distributed to a far wider
population.
Reference
The investigation can be viewed here
https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/31/100-perc...EVvToW4PX4
Quote:Vaccine batches vary systematically in toxicity and are distributed to unsuspecting Americans by three companies: researcher
One company allegedly performed toxic dose range finding without consent (Updated 1/9/22)
James Hill, MD, JD
Dec 6, 2021
38
69
Researcher Craig Paardekooper (Kingston University, London) claims US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data show vaccine batches are sequentially marked by varying toxicity.
Read here about his batch lookup site, howbad.info.
Paardekooper claims:
VAERS shows about 1 in 200 vaccine batches (~ 0.5%) are “highly toxic,” having a high number (1000-5000 times the baseline rate) of severe adverse reactions — including hospitalization, disability, and death — in the short term, i.e., within a few days or weeks of injection.
70% have only one short-term adverse event reported.
80% have only one or two short-term adverse events reported.
The toxic batches are distributed among all 50 US states.
You can look up VAERS data on batch toxicity at http://howbad.info, at least unless and until they change the batch numbering system to conceal toxic batches.
Ex-Pfizer VP and Chief Scientific Officer Michael Yeadon, PhD:
Dose range finding for lethal outcomes
There are 4-5 different sets of lots … in the US showing this DRF [dose range finding] effect.
Worse, there is a quiet period between each of the lethal batches, the purpose of which is clearly baseline establishment.
Source: https://t.me/robinmg/12207
The final, chilling observation is all three companies are doing similar, sinister studies.
They’re operating so as to not run over each other. When company A is deploying lethal batches, companies B & C are deploying only harmless batches.
Source: https://rense.com/general96/toxic-01.pdf
If Paardekooper is correct, the implications are profound: we could be facing mass murder through coercion of Americans to play Russian roulette by vaccination.
This warrants investigation by Congress, the Department of Justice, and state attorneys general.
Paardekooper‘s VAERS analysis should be replicated or refuted by others, including government investigators, as soon as possible.
Here is the video presentation by Craig Paardekooper recommended by Dr. Yeadon:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/keoCmPh3vuiG/
Pardekooper: Patterns of Deployment of Toxic Covid Vaccine Batches::
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6xIYPZBkydsu/
Paardekooper on batch codes and toxicity:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/3RtUTid1XCqi/
Quote:
There is a striking change in batch numbers for the Moderna deployment once toxicity exceeds 1780 x. The batch number changes to ending with 20A. Below this range, almost all the batches in the toxicity range of 100-1780 x have batch numbers ending with 21A.
How to download VAERS data to Excel for analyzing batch toxicity and verifying Paardekooper’s findings:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EPQPrWBQzi6d/
Paardekooper:
It appears adverse effects are not random, but are rather the product of dosage testing within various toxic ranges, each denoted by a particular alphanumeric sequential code.
Source: https://t.me/CovidScienceLibrary/371
Moderna used the alphabet to label vaccines of varying toxicity, claims Paardekooper:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vImdZ7WsV9iW/
Paardekooper video (12/7/21) claims VAERS data show deaths vary by batch.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/OG1NLvZQ4JFu/
He says deaths decrease “in a linear fashion as the alphabetic [batch] designation ascends. Batches can cause 1x [to] 7x the number of deaths, depending on their alphabetic designation.”
Quote:
In this video I show how number of deaths per batch also decreases as the alphabetic designation ascends.
This video demonstrates that -
1. There are different ranges of toxicity for different batches.
2. These ranges of toxicity are distinct from each other.
3. These ranges of toxicity are each labelled with a different letter of the alphabet
4. Toxicity decreases in a linear fashion as the alphabetic designation ascends
As a result, batches can cause 1x, 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, 6x, or 7x the number of deaths, depending on their alphabetic designation.
Moderna has labelled their vaccine batches in accordance with their toxicity [including deaths].
Source: https://t.me/CovidScienceLibrary/377
Paardekooper video (12/10/21) claims VAERS data show disabilities vary by batch.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/C4UJNsiH82sR/
Quote:
The difference in adverse reactions between batches ranges from 5000 to 100, so we have a 50x difference. There is also a 50x difference in rates of death, disability, and life-threatening illness when we compare the least harmful batches to the most harmful. It is hard to attribute such a large difference to throttling.
On the face of it , it appears that the batches vary greatly in toxicity.
And the discovery that each intermediate level of toxicity is represented by a different letter of the alphabet, only raises more suspicions.
Dr. Jessica Rose points out the batch numbering sequence corresponds to date of vaccine manufacture, not of injection into people. This is an important observation that could nullify Dr. Yeadon’s assumption that “there is a quiet [time] period between each of the lethal batches.”
Nevertheless, this does not invalidate Paardekooper’s findings on batch numbering by degree of vaccine toxicity.
James Hill MD’s Newsletter
Rose article does not negate Paardekooper’s finding of systematic vaccine batch toxicity
Dr. Jessica Rose’s December 2021 article Is someone staggering the more 'toxic' Vax Lots? makes the important point about Craig Paardekooper’s findings on toxic Covid vaccine lots (batches) that batch production dates don’t necessarily correspond to administration (injection) dates…
Read more
a month ago · 4 likes · James Hill, MD
An international team of independent researchers claims to have confirmed widely varying toxicity among US vaccine lots.
Twitter avatar for @jhillmd
James Hill, MD
@jhillmd
Toxicity varies by batch.
Independent researchers:
“Covid vaccines have huge variation, with many lots [distributed to 38 or more US states] producing 5 or fewer severe adverse reactions, but many others producing 1000-5000 severe adverse reactions.”
bitchute.com/video/4HlIyBmO…
Image
December 18th 2021
7 Retweets12 Likes
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4HlIyBmOEJeY/
Paardekooper Telegram post (12/18/21):
The batches causing most problems in children are the Pfizer batches in the EW series, shown in green above. The EW series has a toxicity of 1200 to 2500. Historical records show a large number of EW batches having this toxicity. Yet the regulators failed to investigate.
They are destroying these childrens lives. Injecting these toxins into children will cause them suffering that they cannot escape from. Internal injuries and damage will leave them crying almost continually in constant pain...trapped in a hell body.
We need to take direct action against those administering this evil.
Source: https://t.me/CovidScienceLibrary/418
Paardekooper says VAERS data indicate the Moderna L hot batch series, deployed in January 2021 primarily to prioritized older people, had 2,700 adverse event reports, including 33 deaths and 27 disabilities.
Source: https://t.me/CovidScienceLibrary/409
Quote:
100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data
An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.
But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.
The data used in the investigation was pulled from the publicly accessible VAERS database which can be viewed here. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a United States programme for vaccine safety, co-managed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The programme collects information via reports made by doctors, nurses, and patients about adverse events (possible harmful side effects) that occur after administration of vaccines to ascertain whether the risk–benefit ratio is high enough to justify continued use of any particular vaccine.
The reports pulled from the database were ones that had been submitted up to October 15th 2021 and they included all adverse reactions reported against the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injections, as well as all adverse reactions reported against the influenza vaccines; which were used to generate a control dataset .
The VAERS database showed a total of 1,608 adverse event reports against the flu vaccines alongside 15 deaths and 73 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 494.
The ‘lot number’ is a specific string of numbers and letters that tracks a specific batch of vaccine from production and into a persons arm and it is usually found on a vaccine label or accompanying packaging.
The above chart shows the number of adverse event report made to VAERS against the influenza vaccines sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event.
Except for a few spikes the number of adverse events per lot number was generally the same, with no more than 26 reports being made against a single lot number of influenza vaccine.
The above charts shows the count of lots by number of reports of adverse reactions per lot for the influenza vaccines. It shows that 33% of the lots (165 / 494) only had a single adverse reaction report made against them, whilst just 0.6% of the lots (3 / 494) had at least 20 adverse reaction reports made against them.
The above chart shows how many times a specific lot number was identified in an adverse reaction report of which the person had died following vaccination against the Flu. Ninety-seven-percent of the lots (480 / 494) were associated with zero deaths, whilst 13 lots were associated with a single death and 1 lot was associated with 2 deaths.
The above chart shows the number of states within the USA a specific log number of the influenza vaccine was distributed to.
The VAERS data shows that 44% of the lots (219 / 494) were sent to just a single state within the USA, whilst a further 17% (86 / 494) were sent to 2 states, 10% (50 / 494) were sent to 3 states, 5% (24 / 494) were sent to 4 states, 3% (17 / 494) were sent to 5 states, 2% (11 / 494) were sent to 6 states, and just 0.4 (2 / 494) were sent to 12 states within the USA.
All of the above data was then used as a control dataset to compare against VAERS data for the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.
The VAERS database showed a total of 171,463 adverse event reports against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,828 deaths and 14,262 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 4,522.
This data alone shows that there have been 106 times as many adverse reactions, 189 times as many deaths, and 195 times as many hospitalisations due to the Pfizer Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.
The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event. We do not have reliable information about standard lot size, but news articles indicate an average lot size of 1000 vials (approx. 6000 doses).
The highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the influenza vaccine was 26. Which makes it all the more shocking to discover that the highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine up to October 15th 2021 was 3,563, and this isn’t an anomaly.
Thousands of adverse event reports have been made against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine numerous times, and unfortunately the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine hasn’t fared any better.
The VAERS database showed a total of 188,998 adverse event reports against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,603 deaths and 10,225 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 5,510.
This data alone shows that there have been 118 times as many adverse reactions, 174 times as many deaths, and 140 times as many hospitalisations due to the Moderna Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.
The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event, and it shows that the Moderna jab fared even worse than the Pfizer jab in this department with the highest number of adverse event reports against a single lot number of Moderna Covid-19 vaccine totalling a staggering 4,967.
The above chart shows the count of lots against the range of adverse events reported per lot of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. The data reveals that 2,908 lots (64%) had just a single adverse event report made against them, whilst 2 specific lots had over 3000 adverse event reports made against them.
Shockingly we can also see from the data that 30 lots of Pfizer vaccine had between 1,000 and 1,499 adverse event reports per lot, another 20 lots had between 1,500 and 1,999 adverse event reports per lot, and another 23 lots had between 2,000 and 2,499 adverse event reports per lot.
This suggests that there were a small quantity of dangerous batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine and a large quantity of seemingly harmless (at least in the short term) batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.
But the investigation of VAERS data also revealed that reported deaths due to the Pfizer vaccine were again only associated with certain batches of the jab. The chart above shows that 96% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,828 reported deaths were associated with just 4% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine.
Five lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each, a further 5 lot numbers were associated with 81-100 deaths each, and just 2 separate lot numbers were associated with over 100 deaths each.
The same can be seen for the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine. Ninety-five-percent of the lots of Moderna vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,603 deaths were associated with just 5% of the lots of Moderna vaccine.
Thirteen lot numbers were associated with 41-60 deaths each, 2 lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each and 1 lot number was associated with 81-100 deaths.
The investigation of VAERS data also found that specific batches of the pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines which were distributed to between 13 and 50 states across the USA had an unusually high number of adverse event reports and deaths compared to lots that were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA
As you can see from the above table 4,289 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA, recording 9,141 adverse event reports against them alongside 99 deaths and 657 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 2 adverse event reports per lot and 0 deaths and hospitalisations.
However, a further 130 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to between 13-50 states across the USA, recording 166,170 adverse event reports, 2,799 deaths, and 14,155 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 1,278 adverse event reports per lot number, alongside 22 deaths and 109 hospitalisations.
This data therefore shows that each lot from the 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people.
The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘EK9231’; causing over 3,500 adverse event reports.
The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘EN6201’ causing almost 120 deaths.
The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports against the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘039K20A’; causing over 4,000 adverse event reports.
The second most harmful batch of Moderna vaccine was assigned lot number ‘041L20A’, and media reports show that it was actually recalled by the Orange County Healthcare Agency in January 2021 following reports of allergic reactions.
Source
The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘039K20A’ causing almost 100 deaths.
Conclusion
This investigation of VAERS data reveals several concerning findings which warrant further investigation, but it also leads to questions of why authorities within the USA which are supposed to monitor the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines have not discovered this themselves.
The data clearly shows that the Covid-19 vaccination campaign has been significantly more harmful and deadly than the influenza vaccination campaign. This fact alone begs the question as to how the FDA advisory committee could possibly vote Seventeen to Zero in favour of approving the Pfizer vaccine for use in children aged 5 to 11.
One voting member of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee admitted that it will not be fully known whether Pfizer’s vaccine is safe for 5 to 11-year-old children, until it begins being administered.
Dr Eric Rubin of Harvard University said – “We’re never going to learn how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes”.
But the investigation of VAERS has also identified the specific batches of Pfizer and Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm across the USA, which leads to other extremely serious questions requiring urgent answers.
Why is it that certain batches of the vaccine have proven to be more harmful than others?
Why is it that certain batches of Covid-19 vaccine have proven to be deadlier than others?
Why is it that the most harmful and deadly Covid-19 vaccines were distributed across the entire USA, whilst the least harmful and deadly were only ever distributed to a few states? Was this done on purpose?
Could this just be a quality control issue?
A Pfizer whistleblower from a Kansas manufacturing facility did after all reveal that “People are being made to sign off on things that normally they wouldn’t, and then they wonder why their own employees won’t take it”
https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/31/100-perc...-produced/
![[Image: image-302.png?resize=639%2C416&ssl=1]](https://i1.wp.com/theexpose.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/image-302.png?resize=639%2C416&ssl=1)
Quote:
COVER-UP: Report Links Ballooning Fatalities to “Specific Batches” of the Covid-19 Vaccine – By Mike Whitney
"“Dr. Fauci is likely responsible for a preponderance of the total 802,000 US Covid deaths…. It was Dr. Fauci who organized the suppression of easily marshaled and inexpensive early treatments… Fauci who promoted the protocol of sending sick patients home from the ER without any treatment … Fauci who is responsible for the emergency use authorization on the mRNA “vaccines” that may have killed hundreds of thousands more Americans… And .. Fauci who wants to vaxx up all the children in America, despite evidence that the mRNA shots permanently disable children’s innate natural immune systems and can cause lasting heart, blood vessel, brain, and reproductive damage…” James Howard Kunstler, “Where Do You Stand?”"
Question– Can the deaths that are reported on VAERS be linked to specific batches of the Covid-19 vaccine?
Answer– Yes, they can.
Question– Are you sure of that? What you’re suggesting is that particular lots of the vaccine are toxic.
Answer– That appears to be the case.
Question– I want to make sure I understand what you’re saying: Are you accusing the drug companies of murder?
Answer– That possibility can’t be ruled out, although it cannot yet be proven “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Not surprisingly, however, neither industry leaders, regulators or the FBI have shown the slightest interest in examining the evidence that has been meticulously compiled by reputable researchers. The fact is, there is already sufficient statistical evidence that something very sinister is going on that requires an immediate and thorough investigation. It’s a matter of gravest concern, after all, people are dying.
Question– I’m still can’t believe what you’re saying. Do you really think that corporations kill for money?
Answer– Have you ever heard of Vioxx, Paxil or Oxycodone or have you been living under a rock for the last 40 years? Are you at all familiar with the abysmal record of these serial felons that masquerade as respectable pharmaceutical companies but have inflicted horrible suffering and injury on the population? Yes, I realize that liberals love these drug companies and believe they operate with the purest of intentions, but I’m telling you that they’d cut your heart out in a split-second if they thought it would fatten their bottom line. I suggest you expand your reading and figure it out for yourself.
Question– Let’s cut to the chase: What proof do you have that the drug companies are deliberately distributing these “toxic” batches of vaccines?
Answer– Wait a minute: What I’m saying is there’s enough evidence to warrant an investigation. I’m also saying that if industry shills, like Fauci, were really on the up-an-up, they’d temporarily halt the vaccination campaign until this business is sorted out. Now check out this blurb from The Expose’:
“An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.
But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.” (“EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data”, The Expose)
“The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘EN6201’ causing almost 120 deaths.” (The Expose’)
Answer– Think about that for a minute. The “deadly” vaccines were widely distributed across the US but they’re all identifiable by a simple lot number. That’s astonishing, don’t you think? So, we know that specific lot numbers are killing and injuring people but Fauci and Co. still haven’t alerted the public, notified the FBI, called for an investigation or stopped the vaccination campaign. Why? And why is the media ignoring this story? If they were genuinely interested in saving lives, this would be headline news, wouldn’t it?
Question– But that’s all just speculation. You still have not produced a lick of evidence to back your claims.
Answer– You’re right. So far, it’s all just theory, so let’s get back to the article:
“Scientists compared variability between Flu vaccine lots with variability between Covid vaccine lots, and were shocked to find EXCESSIVE and HIGHLY UNUSUAL degree of variation between different lots of the Covid vaccines. When 22,000 flu vaccine lots were examined, almost all of them produced 5 or fewer severe adverse reactions per lot…
When the same number of Covid vaccines were compared, there was found to be huge variation – with many lots producing 5 or fewer severe adverse reactions , but many others producing 1000-5000 severe adverse reactions.” (The Expose’)
How does that happen? How does one batch generate almost zero adverse reactions and another batch generates 1,000-times that amount? Is it just a quality control issue or is there more here that meets the eye?
And this is not a trivial matter since it appears that these particular batches may be responsible for the bulk of the 20,000 fatalities listed on the VAERS reporting system. Also, as the author points out:
“Under FDA regulations, such high variation between different lots and between different manufacturers means the drugs are ADULTERATED, and carries significant legal penalties. Such variation may also negate EUA authorization – which is only granted based on consistency of the product.” (The Expose’)
Question– I agree that it’s all very concerning, but you still haven’t produced any hard evidence yet. Show me the proof of wrongdoing or admit that you’re jumping the gun.
Answer– Look; we’re building a case here without access to the labs where these vaccines were manufactured and without access to any forensic evidence whatsoever. The best we can do is provide circumstantial and statistical evidence that a thorough investigation is warranted. Got it? We don’t have a smoking gun. What we have is compelling evidence that something very sinister is going on. People are dying and their deaths are directly connected to specific vaccine lots that can be positively identified and traced back to their source. Isn’t that enough to justify an independent probe?
I think it is but, naturally, the people who have something to hide are not going to support an investigation.
Now, get a load of this video that gives an excellent rundown of what we’re dealing with. The whole thing is worth watching, but for our purposes, we’ll focus on minute 14: 35. Here’s what they say:
https://www.bitchute.com/embed/4HlIyBmOEJeY/ Video Link
“With 2,244 batches shown on the graph, 40% had only 1 adverse reaction, whereas the top 20% were causing over 1,000 adverse reactions per batch… Which shows that the top 20% is 1,000 times worse than the bottom 40%.” That’s exactly correct. Only a small percentage of lots are causing almost 100% of adverse events and deaths in our data sets.. There can be 1,000% difference in the experience of someone who gets a shot from one lot, than from someone who gets a shot from another.” It’s a very disturbing situation, no product should be varying like this when it is being given to masses of otherwise healthy people, (including) pregnant women and children. We are exposing them to a gigantic amount of risk. …
…People who think (these vaccines ) are safe and effective like all the traditional vaccines you are familiar with, you should think again, because this variability exposes a large number of people to excessive risk.
…Sometime manufacturers are exempt from good manufacturing practices if the FDA deems it is a public health emergency, but in that case, the public should be aware of what they are taking. They should not be equating these injections to traditional vaccines.” (“Covid 19 Vaccines by Lot Number”, Bitchute)
Answer– Allow me to state the obvious: “1,000% difference” is more than a rounding error. It suggests that certain lots are contaminated even though they are still being used. That is flat-out scary.
Also, while this analysis does not prove a criminal conspiracy, it certainly strengthens the case for those who– like myself– believe that that’s exactly what’s going on, a conspiracy. Naturally, any depopulation scheme would have to appear randomized and sporadic. Such a scheme would not play out in a year or even two years, but over the course of a decade or more. Vaccines would play a critical role in that scheme as they provide direct access to the physical biology of all 7 billion people on earth. A small portion of those people would die shortly after inoculation, which is what we are seeing here. The vast majority of fatalities, however, would only show up in the excess mortality data which has been steadily rising in all the countries that launched mass vaccination campaigns earlier in the year. The trajectory of these excess deaths suggest that the depopulation agenda will only be achieved over a protracted period of time, perhaps, a decade or more. What that shows, is that –while our rulers may be evil– they’re not stupid, in fact, they are disturbingly calculating. Here’s how analyst Steve Kirsch summed it up on his Substack account:
“It is exceptionally clear that criminal activity within the vaccine community has caused an adulteration of 1% of the vaccine batches, which is why overall we get such poor results…. This is exceptionally clear when you see that about 99% of the vaccine batches produce typically 0-3 adverse events in the VAERS database, whilst the other 1% produce typically hundreds to many-thousands of AE (Adverse Events), including almost all of the deaths and serious disabilities, which aren’t present in the other 99%.”
Repeat: “Criminal activity… has caused an adulteration of 1% of the vaccine batches.”
As former Pfizer VP Mike Yeadon points out in another post, there are only two options we need to consider regarding this matter. Either:
1. No one noticed. (Not the manufacturers, nor FDA, nor CDC, HHS, insurers etc.)
2. (Or) They know. (what’s going on, that is.)
Which is it?
Yeadon concludes that it would be impossible for the people in charge NOT to know. So, yes, they DO know; they know there are “adulterated” batches that are killing and injuring people, just as they know they’re not going to do anything that would rock the boat and change the ultimate outcome. So, the fatalities will continue to mount; that’s what we’re left with. Here’s more from Yeadon:
“Given VAERS is publicly accessible & is specified as a tool for detecting the unexpected, there must be someone in a three-letter agency tasked with monitoring VAERS…. The he adds this, “I don’t care what your general view is of vaccines broadly or covid19 vaccines specifically, you cannot accept this huge degree of output vaccination from lot to lot. It’s injected Russian roulette.”
Not surprisingly, that’s the term that keeps popping up everywhere: “Russian roulette”; spin the chamber and hope you don’t blow your brains out. Is it too much to expect that vaccination should be more than a (potentially) life-ending roll-of-the-dice? Is that too much to ask?
![[Image: Devil-600x405.png]](https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Devil-600x405.png)
![[Image: VaxxBatchMW-2.png]](https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/VaxxBatchMW-2.png)
![[Image: pfizer-covid-19-400x250.jpg]](https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/pfizer-covid-19-400x250.jpg)
![[Image: FDA-myocarditis-1024x270.png]](https://www.coreysdigs.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/FDA-myocarditis-1024x270.png)
![[Image: Screen-Shot-2022-01-09-at-10.37.04-PM-1024x526.jpg]](https://www.coreysdigs.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Screen-Shot-2022-01-09-at-10.37.04-PM-1024x526.jpg)
![[Image: Screen-Shot-2022-01-13-at-2.34.30-AM-1024x514.png]](https://www.coreysdigs.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Screen-Shot-2022-01-13-at-2.34.30-AM-1024x514.png)
![[Image: Screen-Shot-2022-01-09-at-10.48.54-PM-1024x478.jpg]](https://www.coreysdigs.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Screen-Shot-2022-01-09-at-10.48.54-PM-1024x478.jpg)
![[Image: Screen-Shot-2022-01-12-at-11.48.15-PM-1024x604.png]](https://www.coreysdigs.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Screen-Shot-2022-01-12-at-11.48.15-PM-1024x604.png)
![[Image: Screen-Shot-2022-01-09-at-9.27.17-PM-940x1024.jpg]](https://www.coreysdigs.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Screen-Shot-2022-01-09-at-9.27.17-PM-940x1024.jpg)
![[Image: Senior-Woman-Doctor-Shot-Vaccine-400x225.jpg]](https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Senior-Woman-Doctor-Shot-Vaccine-400x225.jpg)
![[Image: SW9Hw7OO8EgWQAgMseoW_21_714364dba4f393c7..._image.jpg]](https://video.ugetube.com/upload/photos/2022/01/SW9Hw7OO8EgWQAgMseoW_21_714364dba4f393c7de205b866fd02d17_image.jpg)
![[-]](https://hyperspacecafe.com/images/duende_v3_local/collapse.png)