Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
USDA threatens $60,000 fine, federal raid against woman in legal possession of indoor lemon tree
#1
by Ethan A. Huff, staff writer

(NaturalNews) The US government's assault against innocent American citizens continues to get more aggressive and just plain strange, with new reports of harassment against honest owners of ordinary lemon trees. Health Freedom Alliance (HFA) reports that officials from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) are now spying on people whom they suspect are in possession of ordinary lemon trees, and threatening them with excessive fines and even federal raids if they refuse to surrender the plants on demand.

Several years ago, Bridget Donovan, who has now been dubbed "The Lemon Tree Lady," purchased a Meyer lemon tree from meyerlemontree.com. A resident of Wisconsin, Donovan purchased the tree legally and in full accordance with all federal and state laws regulating citrus transport, and had lovingly cultivated and cared for her indoor citrus plant for nearly three years.

Then, out of nowhere, Donovan received an unexpected letter from the USDA informing her that government officials were going to come and seize her tree and destroy it -- and that she was not going to be compensated for her loss. The letter also threatened that if Donovan was found to be in possession of "regulated citrus" again, she could be fined up to $60,000.

Donovan was shocked, to say the least, as her tree was not a "regulated citrus." The store from which she purchased it is fully legitimate, and she had done absolutely nothing wrong. But it turns out Donovan and many others who had also purchased similar citrus plants had faced, or were currently facing, the very same threats made against them by the USDA.

Most of those targeted simply surrendered their trees without trying to fight back, Donovan discovered. And while she, herself put up a hefty fight in trying to get honest answers in order to keep her tree, Donovan was eventually forced to surrender it as well. And worst of all, many of those who were told that a replacement tree would be in "compliance" later had those trees confiscated, too.

Why has the USDA been targeting lemon tree owners? The answer is unclear, other than that they are a supposed threat to the citrus industry. And a USDA official admitted to Donovan that the agency has been spying on those suspected of owning lemon trees, and targeting all found to be in possession with threats of fines and raids if they failed to give them up -- and the agency has been doing this without a valid warrant.

"I felt utterly violated, angry, and upset," Donovan is quoted as saying by HFA. "I pay my taxes, I obey the law, and this is how I was treated? I did nothing wrong. I would expect these action (sic) toward someone running a drug house, not someone who owned a lemon tree."

Be sure to read Donovan's entire shocking story here:

http://healthfreedoms.org/2011/09/2...

http://www.naturalnews.com/033758_USDA_lemon_tree.html
Reply

#2
This is crazy.
Reply

#3
regulated plants are those grown from Monsanto genes...

her's could reproduce if the seeds from her lemons were planted... Monsanto's cannot... thereby assuring Monsanto and all its agents a perpetual income from people being forced to buy their plants/trees every time such a plant is needed...

... the "threat"... is that she could hand out seeds that grow to anyone she wished... thereby placing the industry "under threat" of people not having to buy Monsanto lemons...


she does NOT work for the US Department of Agriculture (USDA)... she is NOT an employee of theirs... yet she CONSENTS to abiding by that corporations codes/laws... but those law/codes are ONLY for their employees... and no one else...

all she needed to EXPRESS... and express it properly... is that she is NOT a "statutory employee" of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA).... and is therefore not bound by any of their company policies... secondly... she is NOT the all-caps name that appeared on any of the notices sent to her by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA)... they should have all been sent back with the expression of statutory status... but a properly written letter of expression...

they say ignorance of the law is no excuse... and this case is proof of that...
“THE FEDERATED STATE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW IS VIEWED AS A SOLE PERSON.” - 7th Inter­na­tional Con­fer­ence of Amer­ica States
Reply

#4
US REGULATIONS ON LEMON TREES...... WHAT ?????????


:shock: :X :shock: :X
Reply

#5
It just show you how powerful Monsanto is. They can get any law they want passed.
Reply

#6
Richard Wrote:It just show you how powerful Monsanto is. They can get any law they want passed.
richard... it seems you're falling into the mindset of the worldly...   that is for your average tom-dic&harry... stay away from that realm... that is where most all are programmed to live in today's society... the worldly is only for fictions... the real live on the earth... not in the worldly...

Monsanto and all other corp[ses]erations can make all the[ir] company policies they wish... that includes the corporation of US... the only ones that must abide by such rules are their employees... no one else... and unless you rebut their "convenient" presumption of them approaching you as though you are an employee of theirs... then you shall be...

When the Monsantos of the commerce world get any of their colored-laws passed or approved or recognized by another corporation... it does NOT change the fact that they are still company codes/policies COLORED into the form of law... it is sad to see that people actual cannot tell the difference between colored law and true/positive law...  a living man is NOT obligated to abide by any color of law lest by their consent... tacit or otherwise...

when they come at what you think is YOU... with obligations/bills/summons etcetera all... they are in FACT doing s with the HOPE that you do not know WHO you truly are and what the law really is...  only then does their fraud work...

You are simply: richard.

you are not Richard SMITH or RICHARD SMITH or Mr Richard SMITH - they are a TRUST... a legal construct

when you were conceived... your parent did NOT hold you up to the light and proclaim, "This is Mr Richard SMITH... in any representative legal name derivation thereof."

they proclaimed... "This is richard."

that is how they chose to identify you... and not as a legal construct of any form...

Your family name is NOT your name.... it is common to anyone of your bloodline... it is in truth... a index.... a GROUP identifier... and it is NOT a surname... it is not a legal name... it is the TRUE name of a familial bloodline.... nothing more...

Surname is derived from the words... NAME and SURETY... SURname... so when you confirm that you have a SURname... you are... without realizing... accepting LIABILITY for any obligations in THAT SURname.

... that is what you are doing richard of the family smith... 

So when agents of Monsanto approach you.... regurgitating their own company's policies on your lap... in the guise of law... they address you as Mr SMITH or Mr Richard SMITH or RICHARD SMITH... when you hear the name pronounced or written... it sounds and looks similar to your TRUE name.... but it is NOT... it is a "spelling" of cast words... a magical spell-ing... attempting to create an illusion that manifests itself into a [color="#0000ff"]real[/color]-ity for those who do not [color="#0000ff"]real-[/color]ize  what is actually occurring...


... so when they present you with any of their paperwork (claims.. presumptive claims.. allegations etcetera)... if you don't set the record from the get go.... you're in military/commerical court...  by stating a court of public record and setting the rules of the court, like the Constition 1787 or Equity law, or that Natures (natural) law stands as the law... by casting your own spell of words on paper as soon as you receive their colored notice that should have been served only to an employee of their company and NOT you the citizen/natural... and... notarizing your legal instrument (of magic) and... having the Notary's signature and oath AUTHENTICATED by the registrar of any court of record... or by the Secretary of State... and attaching their authentication notice to your spelling instrument and finally... RECORDING it into the public record through a 'Clerk of court' of any 'court of record'...
[color="#aa0000"]
[color="#000000"]... and you must also accept their Oaths of office, up front, upon approaching them... tell them directly as you begin to talk to any of them... "I accept you oath of office"...  ie your notary's oath of office, the clerk of court and the Sec of State's OoOffice... in all your dealings with them... written or verbal contact including on your instrument... so they wont be able to change the law/jurisdiction every time they leave and come back...  otherwise... by you say nothing you aquiesse to the military court... ie you tacitly consent yo being a statutory employee of theirs... when in real-ity... you are not... they have NO pay-records on you...  if they do NOT pay you for working with or for them... then you are not employed by or for them... so let them know... that's all it takes... but you have to do it in a manner to be proper at law...[/color][/color][color="#000000"]

you have to live by the law... and to do so... you have to know the law... and to do so... you have to STUDY the law... otherwise... you live in fiction... in the color of law... not in the true form of law... and to study the law takes time... it does not take genius... it is not meant to be impossible to learn... only lengthy and time consuming... and for those that do not know where they are now living... in what realm they truly dwell in at present... there has never been a better time than now to start learning...

the following... is not meant to be construed as any form of religious statement... ravvau does not suggest anyone attend any form of church or other spiritual dis-solvers... but rather... as words of proper law... the highest law... scriptural law... ie equitable jurisdiction... aka nature's law... the law of the universe... taken out of a book of true law (uncolored law)... as follows:


[/color]GODS LAW as written in the 1599 GENEVA BIBLE at [http://www.americanvision (D0T) com] says:

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast refused knowledge, I will also refuse thee that thou shall be no Priest to me: and seeing thou hast forgotten the Law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6

"And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4

"Then Peter and the Apostles answered, and said, We ought rather to obey God than men." Acts, 5:29

"Draw near to God, and he will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners, and purge your hearts, ye double minded." James 5:8

"And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve, whether the gods which your fathers served (that were beyond the flood) or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but I and mine house will serve the Lord." Joshua 24:15

"No servant can serve two masters: for either he shall hate the one, and love the other: or else he shall lean to the one, and despise the other, Ye cannot serve God and riches." Luke 16:13

In case you’re startled by now… if I may say, by virtue of some clarification for you…

Sorcerers are at work in the world.

Words are Spells - words are spelt. They mean everything.

There is no big path and little path - Law comes from the "source" - it is divine. The source is before your eyes at every moment - if it involves secret societies, secret oaths, hidden agendas, esoteric and initiated paths (ie. Freemasonry) then you can bet your life that it is serving a "false god". They (ie. the powers that be - who you despise) NEVER violate Devine Law; get that straight into your mindset - because that is how you beat them.
They learn all about it in their 'secret societies' – will any one deny that all the senior barristers, judges, politicians, police, bankers, etc. aren't Freemasons, or that it is just a coincidence if they are?  They know the karmic consequences if they violate Divine Law. That is why there is The Hague.

However, Law only applies to sovereign entities - slaves and chattel have no Rights and no Status under Law. WORDS MEAN EVERYTHING – if we don't understand that, we don't understand anything.

There is no separation of State and Spirituality - there is only one path. Honour thy birthright.

I see you speak of war honorably; under the supposed righteous evocation of certain spelled words, we send our sons, fund our sons (via taxes) and support our sons to go off to Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, Korea, Sudan and elsewhere all over the globe to kill families, women, children, sovereign beings - we treat them as the dirt under our feet - yet we complain when we are treated similarly or aren't treated as we demand. If you deny another sovereign being the right to life and liberty, then what right do you have to claim such rights? How do you think the law - nature's law - Divine Law - is going to treat us?  Every word, every action, every intent reverberates across all worlds and dimensions.  Sorcerers have convinced us otherwise – we must grow up - and take responsibility - educate ourselves and stop acting like children.

Words are what you use to state (status) who you are.

They don't mean nothing - they mean everything.  If you cannot articulate your thoughts, then you simply Babble (as in Babel).

I want you to try and have a thought without using words - it is impossible!  Everything else is reaction and/or emotion.  Thought is rooted in language - that is why the ancients said that language was a 'divine' thing.  If your words are Babble, then your thoughts are scrambled - you must be a minor/child, because an adult is coherent.

For instance; look up Ma'at.  In ancient times, Law was derived following the codes based on the concept of Ma'at.  Ma'at represented truth, order, balance and justice in the universe.  This concept allowed that everyone, with the exception of slaves, should be viewed as equals under the law, regardless of wealth or social position.

Ma'at - maternal, mother,  Moor, Mu'ur,  Mason  (son of Ma - son of the mother).  Ma'at is female. 

Everything that comes into this material realm comes via the female/womb only.

The universe is female. God is female. Allah (All Law) is female. What god do you worship? God the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost?  A male god?  With all male priests, male Imams and male monks, clerics and scholars?  If so, you are worshipping a false god - you cannot serve two masters and you are breaking universal/divine law.  Karmic consequences will follow.  Are women allowed in Freemasonry?  Why not?!  We all have the same birthmark on our stomach to remind us of this Fact/Reality.  NAvel, NAtion, NAtionality, NAtivity, NAme - derived from Net or Netjer.  What is your Nationality?  Your birthright?  Your Status?  Can you articulate it? Your NAME is very important - is your name derived from your mother or your father?  If we don't know origins/history, we have no heritage and cannot claim our Rights.  Our heritage comes from our mothers, not our fathers.

Reiteratively; Sorcery is the manipulation of language.
Regarding the LORD God blessings and teachings;
Blessed be the LORD my strength which teaches my hands to war, and my fingers to fight. -  Psalm 144:1
But My enemies who did not want Me to be King over them; bring them here and kill them in front of Me. - Luke 19:27
I pursued my enemies and overtook them; I did not turn back till they were destroyed. - Psalm 18:37
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth.  I came not to send peace, but a sword. - Matthew 10:34

if Yahweh created man and woman in chapter 1 Genesis, why did the LORD God have to repeat the process in chapter 2 by making Adam and Eve?  The answer is that they are not one and the same.  God created man and woman and the LORD God created the fictions (note well that the word LORD appears in all capitalized letters in the Bible aka Capitis Deminutio Maxima;

Capitis Deminutio (As defined in Blacks 8th Edition)

 Black’s Definition: A diminuation or alteration of a person’s legal status.

Capitis Deminutio is the destruction of the “caput” or legal personality. Capitis Deminutio, so to speak, wipes out the former individual and puts a new one in place, and between the old and the new individual there is, legally speaking, nothing in common. A juristic personality may be thus destroyed in one of three ways. The description continues, and the three levels are thus described:-

1) Capitis Deminutio Maxima (The worst case or lowest rank in status)
     The diminuation of a persons’ legal status as a result of being reduced
     to slavery. Identified by the names JOHN DOE, OR DOE: JOHN

Fictions, as we all know have all Capitalized NAMES.  In the Bible all the fictions are spelt in uppercase, e.g.: LORD, MOSES, JESUS, just as entities are in our present commercial world, because the Bible is fundamentally a book about Commerce, hence all commercial law is derived from it.  Or is it the other way around?

As for the Law - all Law follows this procedure:

1) the STATUS of all the parties must be established...because this determines

2) the JURISDICTION (and Venue) and authority of those who seek to judge so that

3) ADJUDICATION can occur

Whenever supposed 'freemen' talk about "Conditional Acceptance", you know that they have skipped right on past Status and Jurisdiction and are straight into the Adjudication. DON'T ACCEPT ANYTHING UNTIL THE STATUS OF ALL THE PARTIES HAS BEEN CHALLENGED.  The 'System' has no status and has no jurisdiction over living competent men and women or sovereign entities without their consent; Queen Elizabeth the second and her immediate family can not ever be taken to 'commercial'/colourable Courts.  They can however be taken to The Hague.  If you 'conditionally accept', you are in the game, playing the game - albeit very skillfully.  Point being that UCC/strawman/honour-dishonour/conditional acceptance - they are all submitting to 'their' jurisdiction. 

The 'system' is real and must be dealt with. How you deal with it is the issue.  But you are not a sovereign being; a sovereign stands their ground.  This is a huge topic - it involves massive hours of study.  KNOW THYSELF - whoever controls the knowledge of our history and heritage has enormous power.  But it is in our cellular memory and they have to kill us to negate that. You can govern by the rule of law or by the force of arms. Ma'at will not put up with the latter for very long.

[color="#0000ff"]
[/color][color="#000000"][color="#0000ff"]... and the TRUTH shall set you free... to be able to keep your lemon tree... and then some...[/color]


r

[/color]
“THE FEDERATED STATE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW IS VIEWED AS A SOLE PERSON.” - 7th Inter­na­tional Con­fer­ence of Amer­ica States
Reply

#7
This legal talk has confused me. All I know is big lobbies usually get what they want from the government and Monsanto has a very big lobby that spreads money to all the politicians.
Reply

#8
this is the position of far too many richard... and i know where they are coming from...  it can be a daunting task... but as with all such tasks... they have to be started somewhere... or let go of ALL together...

iow... if you choose the latter... then at least be a good slave... and do everything that you are told... only then will they honor you... but at what cost?

you see richard... in this world... and on this earth... there are are only TWO main forms of people... the self determining... and the slave... please watch the following in its entirety:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P772Eb63q...6C34E860A8


so you can only be one of them... and sure... there are subclasses within the two... but fundamentally... there is no other choice...  and that... solely by the past ignorance and lack of understanding of the people...

... in this forum... people are always talking about the illuminati etc... how bad they are... how they must be stopped... etcetera all... but in truth... they are nothing... they are irrelevant... when you stop to think of WHO truly has the power... and that... can be proven within scripture...

... the Creator, God, Divine Providence... made us in His image... He... She... did NOT make corporations, govts... or any other fiction... in His image... and if He is the Almighty... then WE as living men and woman on earth... are second in power by inheritance... by heir...  second... because the maxim stands... that the created cannot be superior to their creator....

none the less... those created by Him... are without dispute... greater than those created by His creations... ie.. constructs of man... which all corporations and statutes and codes and bylaws are...

so from the perspective of the single man or woman... the solution is one of three... and simple...

1 you either learn the law and apply it as your remedy... whatever that takes... or

2. mankind collectively stands up and voices their will and intent through demand... or

3. you succumb to your imposed enslavement... and continue on your path of enslavement by being a good slave...

and that... i say generally.. not specifically to you richard...

the time of sitting on ones bottom is long over... if they cannot do ti themselves for themselves individually.. and slavery they find abhorrent... then they must UNITE... as so:


http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution


either way... the choices are there... and they are ours...

and that's it... 


 
“THE FEDERATED STATE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW IS VIEWED AS A SOLE PERSON.” - 7th Inter­na­tional Con­fer­ence of Amer­ica States
Reply

#9
So are you trying to say Monsanto isn't the reason why this woman can't grow a non-GMO lemon tree in her home?
Reply

#10
i am saying much more than that richard... therein my 2 previous posts... lays remedy at law which most people cannot find if their entire lives are spent studying mainstream law text... such things are hidden from all mainstream... therein lays the essence of what needs to be done so that no corporate can ever touch you... and the remedy to attaining OWNERSHIP (alloidal title) of your property... any property... but in regards to what I am saying about monsanto with respect to your question...

... YES...

in essence... they have nothing to do with it... UNLESS said woman OR man let them do it from their own lack of knowledge... it is the woman that is empowering them...

monsanto have instigated it... but with the approval of the government... they are in collusion... ie partnership... they each own shares in the others corporation...  it is in their interests to do what needs be done to achieve PROFIT... you know the old adage richard... that you often state... "the ends justifies the means"...

the people on top of the these corporate pyramids are the same ones you and everyone else here often talk about.... ie the illuminati...

they are the ones running all this under their doctrine of ideology... codex magica...

... they have over the centuries... changed the language of the common man... in an effort to make them use a language whose primary purpose of design is to allow the caster of its words to make falsehoods seem truthful... and it is not just the english...

it started with english... slowly morphing and perpetrating its way into all existing languages... no country's language today is what it was a thousand and more years ago... and it is NO MORE EXPRESSIVE today than then... in fact... the worlds best linguists will assure you that languages of today are less expressive than their original constituents... some are FAR less expressive...  this is not by accident...  this is the intent of members of the sun cult of antiquity... of whose leader today is of german bloodline...

richard... this plan... is far older than most realize... i can assure you that it dates back over 10,000 years... long before the roman empire... and before the greek... in fact... even before the mayans... and people throughout that time have  all been fighting to live... to end the tyranny... but to end the tyranny does not mean to end the true law... proper law must exist lest we be lawless... it is lawmakers with self centered intent that be best done away with...  statutory law must be irradiated from the face of the earth... because it is the law that deals only with fictions and has no morality as it deals only with the DEAD... not with living men and women... they simply use the color of their law to make people think that they are referring to men and women when talking about PERSONS... they are not one in the same... the words MAN and WOMAN do NOT appear in any statutory law text... in no man made law books... because they cannot deal with living men and women...only with stautory entities... ie fictions...

the word person... and persona... is created from:

Per Son...

as in.. we are all sons of God... so in TRUTH... we are simply:

Son

Per: son...

implies... not the Son... but some "thing" acting as the son... ie a "REPRESENTATION" of Son... whereas... we are PRESENT as Son... we do not REpresent as Sons of God... we are present as Sons of God...

"represent yourself in court"... WHY?  why would you or OTHERS...  re-present yourself anywhere... when all you need do is PRESENT your true self?? 

because when you represent yourself in any forum for the first time... it is deemed as you NOT being the real you... as being a representation of the real you... a fiction... a legal construct...

... and when others are allowed to represent you... then that shows your incompetence at law to deal with your own matters...  and an incompetent at law HAS NO SAY... he is classed as a WARD OF THE STATE... in bad need of fathering... and when the child attempts to tell the father what to do... as many try when they attempt to argue in court... the father is NOT obligated to hear them... as in... act on what they say... because they are not competent enough to know better than the father... ie.. the judge/magistrate...

the difference is every so slight... but the meaning is enormously different... and if you spend some time learning the meanings of the main words and terms they use... ie legalese... it will benefit you immensely...

this rabbit hole goes so deep... that once you approach the bottom of it... you'll realize that it is not a rabbit hole... and the secret is... to KNOW how to discern the truth from any given words... irrespective as to what the other is seemingly attempting to say to you... iow... you must develop eyes that truly see... once the authorities.. the judiciary... know that you have such eyes... they will no longer bother you... because it costs them money to do so... it is all about profit... it's all business... nothing more...
“THE FEDERATED STATE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW IS VIEWED AS A SOLE PERSON.” - 7th Inter­na­tional Con­fer­ence of Amer­ica States
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.