Posts: 440
Threads: 80
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation:
0
"As far as S's apology in the book that's what I was referring to as Crocodile Tears.IMO you don't do what you did to thousands of children then turn around and profit from it."
Well if he is one of the only survivors, how else is the world suppose to know what happened if he doesn't write about it? I'm not certain it's possible to write books and publish thousands of them without income.
"Much of their work is old ,old stuff that they have taken from others"
I disagree, the majority of Stew/Jans info is profound, personally i haven't seen it anywhere else.
"yet they threaten to sue and bully, in many ways, those who innocently post images that they own. Posted btw on a website that was formed in the support of their work!!!"
is your reason for anger and resentment towards Stew/Jan? Seems to be.
I have posted some images and quotes from his books and I never had any problems. In fact Stewart said he enjoyed my work.
"I have more respect for Anton Levay the head of the church of Satan.At least he is out front about what he aligns himself with and then you have more of a choice at that point."
That might explain why you edited your post at exactly 11:11.
icon_warn
Posts: 3,677
Threads: 283
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 494
Threads: 22
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
0
Most people will always have Suspiscions on Stew. Its not easy to totally overcome Montauk programming. Besides, he knows how to "undo" the harm to those children in the parallel lifelines. It is between him and those souls.
However, I cannot agree that Janet is satanic.
There is nothing in her work that is much different from the work of Linda Goodman in Star Signs (except that Linda supports the Great White Brotherhood and Janet does not)
Now, is Linda Goodman also satanic? If so, there is no new age/spiritual/unconventional philosophy that is non-satanic.
as the only other strong alternatives are OTO/Bardon and the works of Crowley, Parsons, Spare.
Posts: 3,677
Threads: 283
Joined: Dec 2005
A good friend of mine once said 'listen with the ears of your heart'. Only love is real.
FAREWELL
Posts: 2,904
Threads: 131
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
25
We would do well not to put Anyone on a Pedestal ! The whole reason here for You to learn to find the answers for Yourself. Trust No One! ;) Yes, use others as training wheels and not abuse, then glide on your own.!
Posts: 494
Threads: 22
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
0
You are absolutely spot on William.
Posts: 3,673
Threads: 115
Joined: Jul 2006
Reputation:
0
Posts: 3,673
Threads: 115
Joined: Jul 2006
Reputation:
0
This topic could not find an even ground, because it will always attract two energies of people, those who follow and support the Swerdlows and the others that do not, for those who appreciate their work and value their information, it is your human right to feel that way. You should try to understand that there are others that have formed a more personal connection which has not been so positive.
I am not going to broaden this any further, but I do ask those who are supporters of this work not to automatically dismiss those who have a different opinion, this could end up a very long debate and at the end of the day, it is difficult to comment on anotherââ¬â¢s personal understanding of a situation/person, unless you know the whole story.
Posts: 494
Threads: 22
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
0
Hi Karen,
I agree with you that this is a polarized topic.
I dont want to say that the Swerdlows are angels but merely that it is unfair to label them as satanic. I dont think anyone here who has tried a regression can affirm that they have spent all their lifelines without causing harm to others. If we are on Earth, we have done something terrible in one or more lifelines.
I wish to substantiate on Janet and Linda, Linda in Star Signs and Janet in Decoding your Life (the work started in 1986 almosty parallel to Star Signs.)
1. Linda Speaks of Higher Self outside of the body connected by a cord. Janet calls this Oversoul.
2. Both speak of reincarnation, in the end of the book, Linda calls it "Simultaneous" and "Lexigrams" it to say that Simultaneous has "No Time" in it. Janet directly calls it simultaneous existence.
3. Color Visualization Therapy has a complete chapter devoted in Star Signs, the exact same as in DCYL.
4. Both advocate affirmations and abundance. Linda specifically speaks of a seedmoney principle of giving
1/3rd extra away whereas Janet speaks of receiving what we put out mentally.
5. Violet is Janet's favourite colour of protection, Linda uses "Purple PLates" of violet colour for magical acts.
6. Both talk of the "Song of the Soul".
Where they differ most outside this body of work:
ASTROLOGY.
Janet has never had her detailed natal chart made, Linda dedicated most of her life to Astrology.
My point is, if we end up trashing Janet's research as satanic, then it trashes Linda's philosophies then Emerson (originator of Higher Self philosophy) and practically most of Higher Self oriented study. Which leaves the non-sheeple with the alternatives like Drunvalvo-Mt Shasta Channeled stuff, Chaos Magickians, OTOs, Masonry, Kundalini Tantrism and the like which are not exactly very beneficial for safe, independent spiritual transformation.
Let us not trash the message because of the messenger's unpopular traits.
Posts: 1,147
Threads: 15
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation:
0
|
