05-25-2009, 10:46 AM
Actually, I did understand what you wrote. I am not saying what you write seems complicated. I am not very good with words, so I might not always get my point across.
I like MC, I respect and value his contribution.
I can see what you mean if you're thinking of getting people on the same wavelength. But I do not see any value in it for me. Many put these concepts, theories and views first. And themselves after. This is backwards I think. The scientific approach, I do not follow it.
I like MC, I respect and value his contribution.
Quote: What could be more practical and constructive than providing an 'confirmative extension' to an existing widely accepted and agreed concept, that maintains the principles of the established concept's theme?
I can see what you mean if you're thinking of getting people on the same wavelength. But I do not see any value in it for me. Many put these concepts, theories and views first. And themselves after. This is backwards I think. The scientific approach, I do not follow it.
Quote: Would you prefer a vauge and inrefutable answer like, "It is as so, I tell you it is, because I know, trust me."? Many don't HS.I trust myself. So, it does not really matter.