David Icke Suspects Wife To Be a Shapesifting Lizard

[PurplePebble]

They are two different people. If you had the power to front/ own airlines, record labels and space travel, you would not have to do the new age circus circuit and be an "Arena. Guy" like Icke. There are people with that much "money and power" they don't need a side job. Branson does have a different energy from Icke..bran son does not need anyone approval, Icke does, infact Icke relies on the approval of others...thats a start...I am looking forward to seeing that video though comparing the two.

[Elizabeth]

<p>Ed does seem to get most of these actor I.D.'s right, from the looks of it. The Greenberg illuminati family of actors for instance, seems convincing...just not Icke and Branford.  Their facial bone structure it too different...and I know that special prosthetic makeup could change that but literally EVERYTHING else re: their mannerisms, laughter and ways of expression are too different. ~Let's not rule out cloning,lol~or the DNA tinkering that goes on in the underground bases as a way to breed similar agents of the agenda. LOL--PP.</p>

[Sovereign]

<p>Thank you PurplePebble, Richard and Elizabeth for your unique and individual oppions and insights we are all unique individuals in our own right neither of us are right or wrong if we were right all the time we can claim we found the Ultimate truth to lifes many questions. We have all been fooled haven't we by all sorts of belief systems. I have been wrong many times we all can be fooled very easily until we mature enough and really get in touch with the real us instead of the emotional self which is constanly comming in conflict with our intuition but non the less listens to it but whether or not I understand it or misunderstand it is problem I have to deal with alone. But at the present got this thing about what Ed at wellaware has to say until in my mind he is proven to be a Fraud.</p>
<p>We all know what I am talking about we all have that stuborn streak about us and no one no matter how hard people try to convince you otherwise you will not bulge one inch but when it comes time for you to admit to yourself that you were wrong then at the that moment you decide that you need to change tracks and go forward once again looking for evidence to support your truth or feeling you have about an idea. At least that is the description of me. But we can still be friendly towards each other and respect other peoples oppions even thought we might disgree or have different oppions</p>
<p>This Thread is mainly about David Icke who is the most controversial individual on the planet due to his notriety in talking about how Reptilians are controlling this planet covertly. PurplePebble being the most vocal about her concerns if David Icke is a Con Man like Steward Swerdlow since you been conned many times in your life and people have disappointed you many times to make it hard to trust very many people in your life.</p>

[Elizabeth]

Sovereign, I'm thinking that Ed at wellaware is pretty on target most of the time. I don't think he's a fraud...but I do think that he (like every human out there) can be wrong sometimes. In this particular case...I think he's incorrect. And I say this because.....

I'M ALWAYS RIGHT!


-NOT- hee hee hee hee hee lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol hah hah hah hah hah

[PurplePebble]

<p>Sovereign, nobody has conned me..in fact I cant think of one instance of being conned. Stewart tried and failed didn't he. And that is no simple con, it is a complex con with many layers. If Ed Chiarini is right about Icke being the same person as Branson…what is your take on Icke now? If you believe all of it hook line and sinker….do you think Icke is a con man? Myself and others have mentioned this on the forum, along with evidence of his hypocrisy and spiritual manipulations. I know for a fact Icke is a con man. Although he would rather have everyone think he is a legend in the making…which of course is a self perpetuated illusion that his lackeys are happy to expedite for him. Ed Chiarini is right about one thing…Icke is an actor…all con men are good at that though.. I am vocal about Icke being a con man..so I must have been conned a lot not to trust people…? Ed Chiarini is vocal about Icke being an actor…who is also Richard Branson according to him, what is his prognosis? I say Icke is a con man. Ed Chiarini says Icke is a con man…</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thats good enough for me.</p>

[Sovereign]

<p>Here it is the New Video called "The Case For Conspiracy Exposed" by Ed Chiarini.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mediafire.com/?i82u7gr6cv41nxi">http://www.mediafire.com/?i82u7gr6cv41nxi</a>  or go to his website <a href="http://wellaware1.com/">http://wellaware1.com/</a> to download it there.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Video is like 1.2 gigs titled icke.mp4 you guessed it David Icke is being outed in this video as playing Richard Branson as well. Play time 43:06. It took me over 4 to 5hrs to download at around 5o kbytes/sec probably heavy downloading at that time. When I checked the speed after downloading it was around 200 kbytes/sec which would take 1 to 2hrs to download to your computer. Problem being you can not watch it online due to his last account being closed by Vimeo without giving him a valid explanation as to why they closed it down. Unless someone post it on some video account.</p>
<p>I am in the middle of watching the video especially connecting David Icke Son and Richard Brandson Son together and when David Icke was talking with random people while he was at the Occupy Wallstreet thing but are really nothing but actors Ed Chiarini outs as well. He also address the issue about David Icke Arthiritic hand as being a prosthetics applied to the top of the his hands to make it appear he has arthiritist.</p>
<p>Ed Chiarini is telling people who are interested in his new video to download it soon because in all likelyhood by those that are threatened by this video will get the download link closed down like they have done in the past with his other Video Accounts getting them closed down without giving him any valid reason what so ever for doing so.</p>