David Icke

[Richard]

What I can't figure out is who Icke is working for. I know Alex Jones is working for Rothschild. Stew was working for the Sirians until they cut him off. That's why he doesn't know what's going on with the KBA anymore. So I'm not sure who stew is working for now. It's like he's gone rouge. But Icke I was never sure who he's working for because he exposes stuff about Rothschild and Windsor. Maybe that means he's working for Romanoff.

[Free]

This is a DI thread and the cross reference is sometimes an important aspect and perspective. DI kind of kicked Matthew out from the business and instead turned to a kindergarten writer like vigilantcitizen instead. Stewart is teaming up with people he wouldn't have touched with a poking stick not so long ago. Both DI and Stewart is flirting with Alex Collier when it suits them, not for the references they stole from him.

Stewart can offer whatever he wants. It kind of shows he is not professional to begin with and I'm not surprised about sexual deprogramming offers etc. one bit. When you study their business, clientele and behavior you can see that potential between the lines, for sure. If you want to do "sexual deprogramming", at least do it with people who actually turns you on!

If someone on the street told you he's a doctor, would you let him do surgery on you? And surgery is nothing compared with messing with your mind. Is it really about the colors and symbols or the expectations you create yourself? Could it be that the colors and symbols really follow your mind, or intuition, not the other way around? I suggest not to get stuck in them anyway because you honestly have no idea what they really mean, do you?

Whenever Stewart is out there on shows etc. he or they never discuss perhaps the biggest part of their business having clients and what they are really doing in that area. It's mostly about the conspiracy, doom and gloom for public consumption and how they are attacked etc. They are hiding what they really do. Why would they get attacked in the first place anyway? For writing an article, or what? This is never clarified or even touched upon, yet people sit there nodding their heads in agreement offering their support. What the fu*k is that? And where is the proof of anything?

The DI connection is obviously some kind of smoke screen, and both DI and Stewart act as if they have to prove something. To be best in class. "I told you." "See?" Alex Collier and Matthew Delooze couldn't care less about showing off. That's an important perspective. Regarding Alex Jones I'm sure he has his part to play but quite frankly he just doesn't even catch my attention.

When I first stumbled upon Stewart watching his first DVD there seemed to be truth and honesty about it. Now it has turned into an attempted slick sales machinery flirting with the general personal development arena, MLM etc. "We're always changing" really means "we're always making sure we cover our tracks". And it's kind of like MLM where they talk about the 100 people making a grand slam but not the 100 000 people who lost 10 000 dollars each.

I am not a "cointel agent" and I don't need any back-scratching either, thank you very much.

And regardless of who works for who, just make sure you work for yourself first. The DI "exposing" is there for a planned reason, and he's not the one who planned it. Stewart looks more like a handler, just like Mark Phillips is the handler of Cathy O'Brien. Cathy is apparently back doing that sh*t again, but I guess you know that already.

[yukesam]

I am not a "cointel agent" and I don't need any back-scratching either, thank you very much.

Cathy is apparently back doing that sh*t again, but I guess you know that already.

I know you don't need the back scratching for you because you want to back scratch the members and readers here.

Interesting you talk about Cathy O'brian and how apparently she is back to doing what she's been exposing about? We don't know because it's you who brought that up out of nowhere.

That's what cointel agent does. Just like your avatar and you explained that it’s a symbol of creation. It doesn’t match.

A cointel pro always tries to covers a lot in very short period of time attracting variety of people with different interests without going to the details on each issue but only for its possible audience to wait for more in next posts to just see it covers more BS.   

What are your true stances in each issue? We never know because it’s you who are asking those questions. So go ahead enjoy stirring things up here for your audience.

 

[Free]

I am not a "cointel agent" and I don't need any back-scratching either, thank you very much.

Cathy is apparently back doing that sh*t again, but I guess you know that already.

I know you don't need the back scratching for you because you want to back scratch the members and readers here.

Interesting you talk about Cathy O'brian and how apparently she is back to doing what she's been exposing about? We don't know because it's you who brought that up out of nowhere.

That's what cointel agent does. Just like your avatar and you explained that it’s a symbol of creation. It doesn’t match.

A cointel pro always tries to covers a lot in very short period of time attracting variety of people with different interests without going to the details on each issue but only for its possible audience to wait for more in next posts to just see it covers more BS.   

What are your true stances in each issue? We never know because it’s you who are asking those questions. So go ahead enjoy stirring things up here for your audience.

 

I'm here as much to read what other people have to say. It's kind of a give and take situation. I have my way of expressing things and if the shoe doesn't fit, don't wear it.

Yes, Cathy is apparently "back", if she ever left. That's information I have from a credible source at the time. I don't think it's too far fetched to draw the conclusion that both Mark and Stewart are handlers, "hiding" in front of everyone's face. Since DI is selling their books, it's an important perspective.

The avatar doesn't match what? Your idea of what it should be?

I think my stances are pretty clear, and the true stirring up of things goes on in the business itself. That's what I'm trying to point out.

[yukesam]

Yes, Cathy is apparently "back", if she ever left. That's information I have from a credible source at the time.

So what is it this credible source you talking about? Don't just introduce it but do explain it.

[user=1699]Free[/user] wrote:

The avatar doesn't match what? Your idea of what it should be?

No I don't know but you explained it's symbol of creation, that's what you said. Is it look like a symbol of creation? Then how? Just give some details.

[user=1699]Free[/user] wrote:

I think my stances are pretty clear, and the true stirring up of things goes on in the business itself. That's what I'm trying to point out.

So what are your specific experiences to stir the truth from this business itself? You not talking about CIA training are you? Are you an American?

[Free]

Yes, Cathy is apparently "back", if she ever left. That's information I have from a credible source at the time.

So what is it this credible source you talking about? Don't just introduce it but do explain it.

[user=1699]Free[/user] wrote:

The avatar doesn't match what? Your idea of what it should be?

No I don't know but you explained it's symbol of creation, that's what you said. Is it look like a symbol of creation? Then how? Just give some details.

[user=1699]Free[/user] wrote:

I think my stances are pretty clear, and the true stirring up of things goes on in the business itself. That's what I'm trying to point out.

So what are your specific experiences to stir the truth from this business itself? You not talking about CIA training are you? Are you an American?

It's not about my sources. Do your own research and draw your own conclusions.

I think we covered my avatar in previous posts. By the way, buy the album.

The truth about the business is what we're here to figure out.

[yukesam]

It's not about my sources. Do your own research and draw your own conclusions.

Yeah? If it is not about your sources (credible)then why you mention it here. Don't you want to share the truth so we can all figure out together?

[user=1699]Free[/user] wrote:

I think we covered my avatar in previous posts. By the way, buy the album.

The truth about the business is what we're here to figure out.

No you just said it's a symbol of creation. Oh so this is an album cover for music group TOTO, who sing Rosanna?? Well OK why didn't you just say that in the beginning? Instead you just said this " There is a special meaning to the avatar - symbols of creation! "

I think there are more of story about TOTO' album covers ( Sword inside the round stone ring that resembling the snakes) that you not sharing with us. Please share. It'll be an interesting lecture. What is that special meaning you talking about?

[Free]

It's not about my sources. Do your own research and draw your own conclusions.

Yeah? If it is not about your sources (credible)then why you mention it here. Don't you want to share the truth so we can all figure out together?

[user=1699]Free[/user] wrote:

I think we covered my avatar in previous posts. By the way, buy the album.

The truth about the business is what we're here to figure out.

No you just said it's a symbol of creation. Oh so this is an album cover for music group TOTO, who sing Rosanna?? Well OK why didn't you just say that in the beginning? Instead you just said this " There is a special meaning to the avatar - symbols of creation! "

I think there are more of story about TOTO' album covers ( Sword inside the round stone ring that resembling the snakes) that you not sharing with us. Please share. It'll be an interesting lecture. What is that special meaning you talking about?

Why don't you just give your view instead?

Don't make me go into the 1 and 0 again...

[Sifter]

I absolutely miss Matthew Delooze, and I'm on his mailing list should he ever get a hankering to write another long rant... such wit & insight, he tickles me to the marrow.

I've read Is It Me At Anytime (more or less the title, can't remember right off)... and it blew me away that he even suspected that his downloaded memories of abduction were actually implanted because "some of us are harder nuts to crack"... which enabled him to see all the symbols in every culture from antiquity to contemporary times and how the pied pipers such as Icke and Swerdlow and Jones... well follow the money trail.

righteous indignation anyone? lol

[yukesam]

I can spot a bullshitter and that's what I said you are. No direct questions and no answers but more posts that cover everything. OK I got you. I just hope the good members don't fall for your sh*t that's all.