04-27-2014, 03:47 PM
|
Dealing With Psychopathic Elitists, Lash, Sheridan
|
|
04-28-2014, 12:04 AM
Lots of ignorance and/or disinformation from these two especially in part 3.
The railing on about Icke, Wilcock and truth movement gurus is rich coming from them. They are saying the ET/ED phenomenon is simply the manifestation of ARCHONS - lol. Christians say the ET/ED phenomenon is just the manifestation of DEMONS...don't t h i n k so... The spurious psycho-profiling of these two re: this topic is absurd. It's typical, but still breathtaking "academic" narrowmindedness in operation. They fancy themselves scholars and are typical of what comes out of that school of thinking...arrogant selective theorists. Their ignorant theory is pushing human psychopaths of which we do house a few on this Earth. It conveniently disregards masses of data from leaked government documents, abductees, eyewitness etc. So, everything boils down to ...ARCHONS? lol good try guys keep it up. http://gaiaspora.org/wp-content/uploads/...y-2012.mp3 So, the extensive work of Dr. Malanga and 1,000s of abductees as well as Russian book of ETs will just be conveniently ignored by these operatives because they're trying to push their own arrogant, limited agenda? Mirroring paranoia is a concept they're bringing up. Not only are psychopaths paranoid but the people in the truth movement are exhibiting a mirroring paranoia - lol. hmmm, as Kurt Cobain, a suicided MKultra victim said, "just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not out to get you." http://hyperspacecafe.com/Thread-Blue-Planet-Project http://hyperspacecafe.com/Thread-The-Rus...5#pid64065 
04-28-2014, 09:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-28-2014, 09:54 AM by millipodium.)
(04-28-2014, 12:04 AM)Elizabeth Wrote: Lots of ignorance and/or disinformation from these two especially in part 3. I disagree with your assessment, Elizabeth. I fully agree with them that much of the UFO obsessing takes our eyes off of the worldly actors in this globalist elitist takeover. These two are brilliant. They are much more helpful that someone ranting about public spaces and large structures where people gather. And I even like delooze. How many scholars accept the theory of archontic thought control and deception? You're off on this one.
04-28-2014, 10:02 AM
I could fully see the illuminati fucksticks inventing much of the alien stuff to take blame off themselves. Or the aliens could be totally real, or they could be a projected lie of the archons. I really don't have enough information to decide what's true. Theirs is just one opinion. I will remain open.
No matter what "I am a bright sun radiating pure love".
04-28-2014, 11:15 AM
There's room for everyone's opinion here so thank you for yours. : D I started off being a big Lash fan until I wisened up. His ideas will lead us no where good except trapped again in another variation of a NWR (really another OWR). His "solutions" are simplistic, improbable...impossible. Riiigghhht...just turn the tables on the psychopaths. Exactly how - lol?
Try as Lash/Sheridan may to ignore the data and distort the historical Gnostic records their appealing to the dark occult demoness, Kali will not save humanity. It will however, attach more spirits to the lower fourth to be consumed and stuck for millenia. If someone is featured as much as Lash and Sheridan are than they are backed by an agency think-tank agenda. (Lash in particular has made the talk radio rounds for years) and has promoted KALI (of all demonesses) - lol as a kick ass Mother Earth protectorate. The same Kali-demon who demands blood sacrfices. Even the nefarious cult I was involved with in India knew to leave Kali-Ma alone... Interesting that they are going after Icke et al who expose the generational satanic rituals AND the ET/ED agenda. Icke works for certain interests also. I like Matthew Delooze's material and think that he doesn't go far enough - that's my main criticism. Not that I agree with Purple Pebble's Christian leanings (that there really are no ET/EDs but instead it's all demonic) she does do a good job of exposing the Lash/Sheridan horse and pony show. "Remember kids, the door that Icke has kicked down, is the one that leads to more lying Dugpas such as Thomas, who discards Ickes reptilian schpeel for the sake of setting up another trap under the guise of him being an expert on psycopaths. He cant help it if Icke followers are “coming to his “work” now. That is because recently Icke advertised Sheridan on his site, which of course led people to Sheridan. Thomas, unable to come up with an original thought [lol] and have any legitimate insight continues to lift from this blog and pass it off as his own knowledge..." (PurplePebble). http://dugpasandtheirrole.wordpress.com/ "No matter what "I am a bright sun radiating pure love" (millipodium) ...can't go wrong with this! 
04-28-2014, 01:31 PM
I disagree with Elizabeth also. I think there is room for these other teachers to expound with what they know. I know there is more to even the Kali Ma point. Your trying to put words in others mouth. Never have i heard john lash speak of blood sacrifice unless he is teaching the historical facts of such events, he did not invent Kali Mother. And im not sure why your not able to see Sheridan as trying to help us understand psychopaths.
If you dont like someone that is your choice. But many others can and will find great teachings in all that your listed above. Why cut them off from some great learning? Many here could do with more understanding of the true historical understandings of the Gnostics. Never put the gnostics in with Christianity. They had nothing to do with one another. I will not argue much of this point but your bent out to try and destroy lash and sheridan. You can do that if you want but Almost all of your points are invalid and can really be pointed out with true study. I am not cutting you down at all , but like Millipodium i just dont find any truth in what your trying to say about these guys. It is your opinion and i will honor that. I will not blindly follow or study these guys but will learn with discernment. If one day i do see what your talking about then i will say it publicly also.
04-28-2014, 02:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-28-2014, 02:11 PM by millipodium.)
(04-28-2014, 12:21 PM)Elizabeth Wrote: There's room for everyone's opinion here so thank you for yours. : D I started off being a big Lash fan until I wisened up. His ideas will lead us no where good except trapped again in another variation of a NWR (really another OWR). His "solutions" are simplistic, improbable...impossible. Riiigghhht...just turn the tables on the psychopaths. Exactly how - lol? I heard him explicitly say NONE of his gods demands sacrifices. And he never claimed to have a specific solution on HOW to turn the tables, but the concept of trying to find a way to do that at all IS laudable. TGTG with his piercing eyes and chapeau, while I like him also, never seems to get out of the realm of abstractions. And Sheridan mostly talks about psychopaths and these entities whether extraterrestrial, archontic, or fully human are definitely that. It almost doesn't even matter. Bad is bad. I actually didn't like them going after others either. That was my least favorite part, but that I don't think that is a reason to dismiss them entirely. Trying to find a way to turn the tables is viscerally satisfying I agree and I certainly don't require a lecturer to have 1) any answers at all to this brutal predicament we're in, in order to find their material worthwhile. I also don't require presenters to have 2) dates or timelines correct and 3) I'm all for killing the psychopaths with my bare hands if I could actually pull it off! I'm easy-going with most presenters' information and am well able to dismiss minor clinckers.
Two points of Lash are NOT minor clinckers. The ET/ED situation which is trivialized AND the Kali situation whereby she is whitewashed into benevolence. These ARE BIGGIES! I'm not interested in tearing those two down (for the sake it) but in exposing their hypocricy and reminding people that whomever gets the attention of the video radio talk show circuit is on the inside of the deception to lead others to a permutation of the New World Religion. Lash has taken great interpretive liberties with Nag Hammadi codexes as well as other Gnostic sources. NO WHERE DO THOSE SOURCES SAY THAT human beings will be invoking Kali in order to help overcome the Psychopaths. So, why does he always get pushed to the front as the representative lecturer of Gnosticism...his rendition of it unless he's serving 2.5 to 3.0 net of entrapment (reference to Matthew Delooze's 2nd netter trap). The Gnostic Truth Guy while being "stuck in abstractions" as you say millipodium, is closer to the actual truth of the material. He personally walks the talk on spiritual purification level, is offering solace to the afflicted and pins and needles to the ones who need to be afflicted through his writings. There really IS NOT a hell of a lot we CAN do to 'power-grab' this planet back in human favor. Doctor Chiappalone although TGTG and the Doc and Amitakh wouldn't be able to stand being near each other for five seconds...also walk the talk in the form of keeping your spirit and will clean and strong. Opening oneself up to astral entities of the like that hang around Kali is surefire danger. That's what he's promoting. In part 3, Sheridan started spouting tired and academically weak "psycho-babble" arguments about stress/archonic deception playing into dubious contactee/abductee recountings. There is an outrageous, outright dismissal of the serious study of UFOlogy. The links I posted above are only a tiny bit of data. John Lash knows full well the history of Kali and that blood sacrifices have been offered and still are being offered to her since the beginning. His declaring that his deities don't require sacrifice is a meaningless statement. He's being willfully naive, deceptive or both while encouraging others to seek her support. That's reckless pied pipership. Purple Pebble has written a bit on Lash too that is worth reading.  ...In any event, it's clear to me that John Lash is a dangerous infiltrator into Gnosticism.
He for example claims to be an expert on the Nag Hammadi Codices, but he is not telling it how it is. He is lying and distorting to suit his own agenda. He certainly is not the leading expert on these Texts at all. There are several others out there who deal with those same texts, but don't have the platform in the alternative media that John Lash has been given. He can peddle there that he is THE expert on Nag Hammadi and Gnosticism.... While he clearly is not. Laurence Caruana, Gilles Quispel, Elaine Pagels, Stevan Davies, Karen King, Marvin Meyer are some other people who have translated those texts - they differ significantly from what John Lash makes of it, to start with. John Lash stands out, as the only one... To me he is not a Gnostic, rather he is a New Ager. Aliens, demons or archons ... First of all, it seems to me that there are different definitions out there of these 3 terms. So, what exactly is an "alien", what is a "demon" and what is an "archon" ... people have differing notions of these terms. In any event, I am sure that the problem goes much deeper than just the players we see on stage. I also think that these players on stage can be replaced by others quite easily. If you remove the current ones, others are put in that place that are of the same category ... or worse. That's pretty much what happened with EVERY so-called revolution in history. That's also something one should take into account in this, I think... Every revolution in history has been artificially triggered by the powers that be, whoever or whatever they are. I think it's rather naive to think that by removing the world leaders, everything will be alright, or at least bettering on this Planet and for ourselves... The Sages taught to come out of the world, to dissolve the ego, to go within and to detach, as the ONLY real and lasting remedy. Non-attachment. Btw, I have no idea why John Lash has added that Kali narrative to his portfolio, and I don't know much about that character, so I'll have to leave in the middle what that is exactly about. It's certainly not in any Gnostic text whatsoever, it's only John Lash that comes up with that. |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |