Posts: 20
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation:
0
It's the mind pattern more attuned with intuition, that is, almost no doubt, and when caught in doubt must only concentrate a little to remember that the solution is obvious since 3D drama arises from denial of the obvious (victims). Actually it's an analytical version of the "I AM" mantra. I discovered the full meaning of the I AM mantra three months ago, but then I saw that it was 'stupid' to repeat it since it was obvious (no need for repetition). I also went pass several principles and mantras before this one, and all of them were caught by me later as obvious or extremists. The 'obvious' is the only one that brings a recursive peace of mind. Since it's obvious that it's is obvious that it's obvious.....
I'm more attuned with the word version of it, although this mantra comes to me more naturally each day that passes. Have anyone been attuned with something more high-level than this? Cause I want to move the edge. Problem is that, in logic and word meaning there is no other choice for me anymore. Need to go to higher levels of figurative awareness. If you know what I mean.
Posts: 411
Threads: 51
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
1
I guess now you ''Know by Knowing''.
By maintain this mind pattern, one's mind becomes more lighter...and easily expandable.
Posts: 1,748
Threads: 276
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
6
I know what you mean. You want a better mantra or "logical focus" (outlook on life) that allows the new avenues of thoughts and awareness to flow. You would become "in tune", "light", and more receptive to feelings that are accurate about everything yet they evade the five senses.
My logical focus is designed for not only psychic knowledge, but also wisdom of how everything in life are representative of your thoughts.
Things really do seem obvious to your soul personality, and you should feel this wisdom within by following this new outlook on life.
It is in my signature, but it's cut off by the forum software. So here's the complete version (I am not a great writer, but I did my best):
We are a point of consciousness breathing in God. Everything around is here because I chose so. And so are we here because we chose so. "I chose so" shifts our awareness from greater abstraction to our own thoughts. If we constantly view life in this fashion, we will become aware and gain control over our lives. (I am also here because I chose so, for I can see myself in the mirror).
(Tell everything, everyone, and all your qualities, "You are here because I decided so." Eventually you will be all-knowing and in control. You are the microcosm of the macrosm, within God, breathing in and out. This simply is actual.)
Posts: 20
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation:
0
This was one of my past mantras. Seemed obvious to me as well. We are only here because we choose so.
Actually "I Am" , "I say", "I decide", "obvious", are all correlated. I just find "obvious" to be more logical. Not that logic has much place in heavens, but... The next step lies above words and that's what I'm seeking. It will take some time though, and as 'I am that I am' said, if we have reached this level of awareness of being, we are open to expand our consciousness even more.
Posts: 1,748
Threads: 276
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
6
Yes, but for the beginner my mantra is more, what I say, precise, and that helps.
"I am" is a more powerful mantra because it emphasizes the objective observer, individuality, and free will. But it is very abstract to many people and often, their mind shuts down from confusion. I would only use "I am" when I wholeheartedly trust myself and the synchronicities around me. Similiarly, "obvious" is also as distraughting for many people. (But it is not as powerful as "I am")
A more accurate word is not "obvious," but "actuality." According to Stewart's DVDs, reality is the person's view of the reality filtered by his or her conscious awareness and mind-patterns. Actuality is the science of how events are held together by our mind-patterns.
I am a very mundane person, so "obvious" is difficult for me to digest. I find myself constantly reviewing the differences between "actuality" and "reality" to resolve any conflictive thoughts about the actual world around me. At first I may have resolved it, but an hour later, I would need to review the logics of this outlook again.
Again, my mantra is for the beginner, and intermediates. It opens up the conscous awareness to more avenues of thinking and awareness because it pinpoints the exact REASON why everything is obvious or actual. Many of us feel conflictive, doubtful, or numbed down if we just repeat the mantra, so we need to review/remind ourselves of the reason. Moreover, the Reason is analogous to a prompt that will soon earn a response. In this case, the conscious will respond by cooperating with the other two levels of consciousness.
I believe there is no right or wrong answer because everyone is at a different stage and unique level of experience. However, "I am" would be the most powerful, but it may not work for most individuals.
Posts: 1,748
Threads: 276
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
6
Posts: 20
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation:
0
i'm already introducing myself, maybe you should move the thread. did i post on the wrong forum? ;-)
The I AM mantra is probably the most difficult mantra to rationalize. And is the shorter one. I stood with it for some days, and then I left it. It seems to me that this is the ultimate mantra, but I was more worried with practical results. It may be possible that I'll return to I AM with renewed understanding. It happened before and I'm going to have a thought on it, since you mentioned. The difference is that I have discarded the "I AM" mantra because of logic, while all the other mantras were left behind because I found a more powerful one. The "obvious" isn't better than I AM but it is more logical for my mindset, probably suiting my physical reality better, giving me an instantaneous course of action. Probably I AM does not suits logic since aristotelian logic does not contain the identity of opposites, which is precisely what I AM is. This is the "fourth" law of logic, the one that solves paradoxes, as stated by Tom Bearden PhD, and that no scientists seem to be able to see. In this manner, maybe I AM must be kept by me locked in a box, while "obvious" finish completing my courses of action.
I can't seem to grasp "actuality".
Posts: 1,748
Threads: 276
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
6
Wow interesting. Someone should please explain the differences between actualitiy and reality if they've seen the DVD's. I might quote Stewart, but that's when I do get the quote--it'll probably be a long time from now.
Interesting stuff you shared. I guess a logics course never hurts if I registered for one at college.
Posts: 411
Threads: 51
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
1
There can be multiple versions of REALITY...
Yet there is only ONE Actuality...
|
