Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
If he is a 'bodybuilder' then why is he fat?
#11
I always thought David Hasselhoff made that song:PBut I must say that I think there is to much negative talk about Stewart around. I do not think it does anyone any good.

I also agree with the part about bear, I thought the same thing.
Reply

#12
Quote:But I must say that I think there is to much negative talk about Stewart around. I do not think it does anyone any good.
I think you are right. It does anyone any good.

Beste hilsener!


Reply

#13
HeadSpace Wrote:I always thought David Hasselhoff made that song:PBut I must say that I think there is to much negative talk about Stewart around. I do not think it does anyone any good.

I also agree with the part about bear, I thought the same thing.

I agree, too, that there is too much unnecessary mud-slinging where Stewart is concerned. Hey, I'm neutral; but too much picking on his appearance is just petty and maybe smacks on having no other weapons to smear him with. And even if you aren't, you make it sound like you're envious of him and only know of one way to insult him.

Let's focus on other more interesting, beneficial topics for discussion, guys! :)
Reply

#14
EmeraldStar Wrote:
HeadSpace Wrote:I always thought David Hasselhoff made that song:PBut I must say that I think there is to much negative talk about Stewart around. I do not think it does anyone any good.

I also agree with the part about bear, I thought the same thing.

I agree, too, that there is too much unnecessary mud-slinging where Stewart is concerned. Hey, I'm neutral; but too much picking on his appearance is just petty and maybe smacks on having no other weapons to smear him with. And even if you aren't, you make it sound like you're envious of him and only know of one way to insult him.

Let's focus on other more interesting, beneficial topics for discussion, guys! :)

Women are the source of wisdom. :)
Reply

#15
Quote:I agree, too, that there is too much unnecessary mud-slinging where Stewart is concerned.


I don't.

Anyone who takes money from people under FALSE pretences, and also hurts innocent people through his unjustified spite via slanderous inuedoes, and ALSO DAMAGES people who are already psychologically scarred deserve every little bit of what they get.

Only the blind, the dumb and his own covert forum drones would think otherwise.

So which one are you?

If you are neither, then I can only suggest two things.

1. I hope you spoke out against him in his forum when he erronously slandered others solely through his own spite.

2. Don't try gagging me because in these issues I'm ungaggable.  I'll say what I think and what I feel about anyone I choose.  If you don't like it you know what you can do.  Nobody forces anyone to read anything in any forum, and hyperspacecafe is no exception. 

I for one have never done any such things to anyone in this world in my entire life.  I bust my arse and back to make my living all my life unlike others I know.  So don't be attempting to make out as though I'm the bad person and he's the good one.  I have not slandered nor slung mud on anyone, I simply have my own humorous way of putting things. 


There is more truth in my previous post mixed in amongst the humour than Stewart or others may realise; all our deeds returned.

Truth be said.

Reply

#16
It's unnecessary to use that tone here... no one is trying to start any heated argument here. Goes to show how easy it is to trigger another to flare up - nothing.

No one is gagging anyone....!

If Stewart really is slandering others, how wise is it to stoop to his level and do the same to him? Well, I do not judge. And maybe doing the same to him doesn't really mean you are down to that level; maybe it's just the way you have to deal with him for now. No one is gagging anyone here! And no one is forcing anyone to read anything, you are right. So no one is forcing you to read my post, either, either to misinterpret it or anything; Hyperspace is no exception. I, too, can say anything to anyone I choose - and so far, I have not chosen any ways that gag anyone...you chose to see it this way. And like you said, if one doesn't like it, one knows what one could do.

It's good to know that you have not done any such things to anyone in your life! Really. As far as I know I haven't either; and I hope to remain this way. And we all bust our arse in this world, some just do it the wrong way and harm others. Let's hope you and I will never need to be so low.

Like I said, I am neutral, so I am not making you out to be the bad guy (I don't even know you, so that's impossible) and Stewart the good guy (I don't even know!). And if you really have a humorous way of putting things, maybe you would be able to see what I was really saying and not project indignation/anger and take my short little post (with no hint whatsoever of wanting to start a verbal war) so out of context. 

I would say that I am sorry if Stewart had in some way, did some harm to you - but I guess to say more would only cause you to tear into me and say you don't need my pity!

Over and out; and I will not be writing anymore on this. I don't need to have the last word in this.

Sorry everyone, if any awkwardness is caused here! :D
Reply

#17
I'm going to agree with Emerald Star.You're overreacting Andrew,for no reason,I might add.
Reply

#18

icon_devil


Worst People of All Time

1. The Apostle Paul The most evil person of all time is the man known as The Apostle Paul. This was the man who managed to corrupt the radical countercultural socialistic philosphy (click here for more) of a legendary (perhaps mythical) man called Jesus into a repressive religious tradition that has been the cause of tens of millions of deaths in war, the continuing intellectual repression of billions, and the expansion of human population which could possibly make the Earth into a lifeless Venus. Paul does not shoulder all the blame, but he more than anyone else is responsible for this debacle. He twisted a good philosophy to become a most useful tool for tyrants.

http://www.priceofliberty.com/jesus.htm
Jesus was a countercultural revolutionary of his time. In fact, he would probably be a countercultural revolutionary in our time as well, since human culture hasn't really advanced very much in the last two millenia.
In contrast, The Apostle Paul was a counter revolutionary, who twisted the legend and doctrines of Jesus completely around so that they served counter revolutionary rather than revolutionary ends. There is evidence for this even in the legend of Paul himself. According to this legend, Saul was an persecutor of the early Christians. Then, a miracle happened, Saul became Paul and he was converted to Christianity himself. I don't believe in miracles and I don't believe that legend. What I believe really happened was that Paul figured out he he could use twist the Christian myth for his own counter revolutionary ends (after he had sufficiently crushed the first Christians...).
http://www.priceofliberty.com/paul.htm

"Paul was the first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus."
-- Thomas Jefferson
"Fundamentalism is the triumph of Paul over Christ."
-- Wil Durant
"No sooner had Jesus knocked over the dragon of superstition than Paul boldly set it on its legs again in the name of Jesus."
-- George Bernard Shaw
"My long time view about Christianity is that it represents an amalgam of two seemingly immiscible parts -- the religion of Jesus and the religion of Paul. Thomas Jefferson attempted to excise the Pauline parts of the New Testament. There wasn't much left when he was done, but it was an inspiring document."
-- Carl Sagan





Reply

#19
Sariel Wrote:
1.

Physical appearance is the result of Bear genetics and frequency.  And  Stewart has a lot of that like my father. That is powerful frequency, though, I prefer of course Lion frequency (narrow waist, broad high-shoulders, powerful chests.)

2.

Gut is the place where resided our emotions. Fat guts describe jovial and happy person. Contrary to this 'body builders' could be described as robots, having no emotions.

Compare that to Sirius B aliens ('Buddha gut') and Aldeberan human aliens (perfectly shaped bodies, no emotions). 

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/136/34928...f4.jpg?v=0

btw.
Real Buddha, Siddharta Gautama, was Nordic genetic creation and was very high and had that body typical for Lion frequency, and similarly to Nordic aliens and Aryan race.


That's exactly what his physical frame depicts -- that of a big bear, he also reminds me of my father who has a similar body-type, large thick hands and arms, chest etc

I conversely have naturally wide shoulders and slimmer frame. Thanks for the insight on the physicality of the Aldeberans.
Reply

#20
MC Wrote:I'm going to agree with Emerald Star.You're overreacting Andrew,for no reason,I might add.

No MC, you did add, and erronously at that.  Simply because I never overreact to anything.  Perhaps the limitations of expressing ones self over the net have something to do with it perhaps.  I can assure both you and ES that I am not overreacting nor am I upset in any way.

I've had my say, and that's fine too.

Cheers now.Cool

  
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.