05-13-2022, 04:00 AM
Another food plant catches fire???
Soy is not food, and that's the last thing "they" would ever burn. That's what we are supposed to be migrating to. The facility operators have stated that the fire, which took place in a large soy bin, will not affect operations at all. SO IT IS NOT NEWS. I skipped it for a reason and only posted this because Infowars considered it a crisis (when it is not) and I did not want people to think I missed this story. If something is not here the chance I actually missed it is very small, more likely is that I read through to the details and said "Non story". And this is a non-story. Yes, there have been fires at food processing plants lately but not enough to impact anything and the plane crash one was total BUNK. That was a plane crash story, not a food supply story.
How did this get 35,000+ views????
I know how. Now watch it NOT happen.
Several readers are VERY upset by the following post. To that I say, WATCH ME BE RIGHT. How will those "insiders"look when the following ends up as, as I state it will, a steaming pile of dung???
Being a true insider means you call bullshit on bullshit before it is proven bullshit, not after!!! I am "not out of the loop", I am only "out of the loop of bullshit". FINAL ANSWER.
THE BENCHMARK: TRUMP REINSTATED ON MAY 5TH. If that does not happen, the WHOLE THING IS BULLSHIT. And when that becomes an embarrassment the clickbaitable morons will click through to the next bullshit that spews from the same bullshitters, bowing down and worshiping the all new bullshit like info ewoks before an EFFING GOLDEN ROBOT.
The "ministry of truth is not going to ban stuff like this because it will prove "they are allowing the other side to speak" while absolutely nothing but BS is spewed from "alt media". After 5 or so fails like this soon to be fail, anyone who might dabble in alternate opinions is going to shut them off forever. Meanwhile those in alt media who are mortified by crap like this will be banned.
I am only making a big deal of this because it fits today's rant (down past the next (very lengthy) post - it fits it so perfectly. THIS IS WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT, RIGHT HERE:
http://198.46.190.126/images/binbs.png
Here are my forecasted prerequisites for a Trump re-instatement on May 5: Biden&co get 10 hour advance notice of a nuclear strike and then tell Trump to show up at the white house within 10 hours because "they give up" while they run to their tunnels hoping to con Trump into soaking up the heat. That's about what it would take. Maybe the nuclear strike will happen but Trump sure as hell won't be president again.
This is the end of this post. It was originally spread all over the page in pieces and then assembled out of order because it read better that way.
http://www.jimstone.is/trusttheplan.png
We just saw Macron get rigged in Biden style. Yes, the same thing happened:
http://194.233.91.97/photos/votingisfiction.jpg
If even after the same vote magic happened in France that happened with Trump you think your vote matters and you can make a difference, if you really think white hats are in charge holding secret trials while we are all being saved without us even knowing it AFTER HILLARY GOT HUNG AND RE APPEARED 5 TIMES, - If you think we are being saved when the white hats can't fix even election security ANYWHERE after what happened in the U.S last time and they go ahead and steal it the exact same way elsewhere without repercussions, you are a SUCKER. No, at this point more than that, a bottom feeder waiting for someone to flush the toilet on a boat so you can eat.
http://198.46.190.126/images/suckerfish.jpg
As Russia prepares to nuke us, Biden declares he is vice president to Obama (who has been "hung at Gitmo by white hats" multiple times) while Obama is right there grimacing an "oops". Aah yes, there is plenty to eat on the bottom, that fish looks quite healthy.
Now, about that election in France . . . . .
A reader sent:
The voting scam method can also be seen in real-time military exercises.
I witnessed twice in S. Korea their yearly joint-force nationwide training exercise totally fake victory.
A huge part of the scenario involves locating and evacuating civilian personnel (military families and teachers, for example). The computer calculations take into account available civilian boats, planes, anything else available for rapid use, and then combine with number of people being evacuated.
Both times the numbers of civilian personnel dwarfed the available amount of transports, even on the final day.
Yet the very next morning when the tabulations are finalized, we'd declare victory against the N. Koreans as well as full successful evacuation of civilians. When I'd ask how that was possible I was always told to shut up.
Fake numbers. Fake government. Fake military.
If people would only realize.
The following long spiel is for a garbage topic that should not even be on this site. The spiel uses examples of several topics and ends where the food factory fire post is.
The "ministry of truth" will sure love the Gitmo morons, - they will NEVER get banned because there is no substance and they are therefore harmless. They are absolutely PERFECT to use in a game of pretending to allow alt voices to be heard, while anyone with good info will get flushed.
Why on earth did I put so much time and page space into refuting the GITMO white hat bullshitters? I don't know, but I was not drunk.
http://www.jimstoneindia.com/pagesq22022/bullshit.html
Permalink for this rebuttal of page polluting bullshit. Why would anyone of any creedence bother with the topic? Why did I?
A reader sent:
"I am amazed at the number of morons who embrace the obvious disinformation about hangings at Gitmo, etc. It's actually horrifying to see people encourage and even cheer the notion of secret trials and executions.
My response: That is not bad at all. What is bad is when Hillary has been hung 5 times and Obama 3, while Hillary is fresh off an adrenochrome surge and complete baby blood transfusions, so fresh she's not sh*tting diapers anymore and is instead talking about running for president!!!
FOR THE RECORD: There are no hangings at Gitmo. Absolutely no one from the cabal has fallen. Not even Epstein, he's back on his island after a fake suicide where they swapped out Anthony Bourdain for the photos. We are in the era where evil has been unleashed and only the good die young. Pillow guy? Are you kidding me? Buy a pillow from him, not the bullshit!!! The pillows are still good.
THIS IS LEGIT FOLKS, READ IT AND WEEP. While claiming to protect free speech, "disinformation" will not be allowed. What is disinformation? Disinformation is the wrong information, true or not. Fat chance anyone will ever be able to now point out where the root of the problems are. The full text follows.
A Declaration for the Future of the Internet
We are united by a belief in the potential of digital technologies to promote con- nectivity, democracy, peace, the rule of law, sustainable development, and the en- joyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms. As we increasingly work, com- municate, connect, engage, learn, and enjoy leisure time using digital technologies, our reliance on an open, free, global, interoperable, reliable, and secure Internet will continue to grow. Yet we are also aware of the risks inherent in that reliance and the challenges we face.
We call for a new Declaration for the Future of the Internet that includes all partners who actively support a future for the Internet that is an open, free, global, interoperable, reli- able, and secure. We further affirm our commitment to protecting and respecting human rights online and across the digital ecosystem. Partners in this Declaration intend to work toward an environment that reinforces our democratic systems and promotes active par- ticipation of every citizen in democratic processes, secures and protects individuals' priva cy, maintains secure and reliable connectivity, resists efforts to splinter the global Internet, and promotes a free and competitive global economy. Partners in this Declaration invite other partners who share this vision to join us in working together, with civil society and other stakeholders, to affirm guiding principles for our role in the future of the global In ternet.
Reclaiming the Promise of the Internet
The immense promise that accompanied the development of the Internet stemmed from its design: it is an open "network of networks", a single interconnected communications system for all of humanity. The stable and secure operation of the Internet's unique identifier systems have, from the beginning, been governed by a multistakeholder approach to avoid Internet fragmentation, which continues to be an essential part of our vision. For business, entrepreneurs, and the innovation ecosystem as a whole, interconnection promises better access to customers and fairer competition; for artists and creators, new audiences; for everyone, unfettered access to knowledge. With the creation of the Internet came a swell in innovation, vibrant communication, increased cross-border data flows, and market growth - as well as the invention of new digital products and services that now permeate every aspect of our daily lives.
Over the last two decades, however, we have witnessed serious challenges to this vision emerge. Access to the open Internet is limited by some authoritarian governments and online platforms and digital tools are increasingly used to repress freedom of expression and deny other human rights and fundamental freedoms. State-sponsored or condoned malicious behavior is on the rise, including the spread of disinformation and cybercrimes such as ransomware, affecting the security and the resilience of critical infrastructure while holding at risk vital public and private assets. At the same time, countries have erected firewalls and taken other technical measures, such as Internet shutdowns, to restrict access to journalism, information, and services, in ways that are contrary to international human rights commitments and obligations. Concerted or independent actions of some governments and private actors have sought to abuse the openness of Inter- net governance and related processes to advance a closed vision. Moreover, the once decentralized Internet economy has become highly concentrated and many people have legitimate concerns about their privacy and the quantity and security of personal data collected and stored online. Online platforms have enabled an increase in the spread of illegal or harmful content that can threaten the safety of individuals and contribute to radicalization and violence. Disinformation and foreign malign activity is used to sow division and conflict between individuals or groups in society, undermining respect for and protection of human rights and demo- cratic institutions.
Our Vision
We believe we should meet these challenges by working towards a shared vision for the future of the Inter- net that recommits governments and relevant authorities to defending human rights and fostering equitable economic prosperity. We intend to ensure that the use of digital technologies reinforces, not weakens, de- mocracy and respect for human rights; offers opportunities for innovation in the digital ecosystem, including businesses large and small; and, maintains connections between our societies. We intend to work together to protect and fortify the multistakeholder system of Internet governance and to maintain a high level of securi- ty, privacy protection, stability and resilience of the technical infrastructure of the Internet.
We affirm our commitment to promote and sustain an Internet that: is an open, free, global, interoperable, re- liable, and secure and to ensure that the Internet reinforces democratic principles and human rights and fun- damental freedoms; offers opportunities for collaborative research and commerce; is developed, governed, and deployed in an inclusive way so that unserved and underserved communities, particularly those coming online for the first time, can navigate it safely and with personal data privacy and protections in place; and is governed by multistakeholder processes. In short, an Internet that can deliver on the promise of connecting humankind and helping societies and democracies to thrive.
The Internet should operate as a single, decentralized network of networks - with global reach and gov- erned through the multistakeholder approach, whereby governments and relevant authorities partner with academics, civil society, the private sector, technical community and others. Digital technologies reliant on the Internet, will yield the greatest dividends when they operate as an open, free, global, interoperable, re- liable, and secure systems. Digital technologies should be produced, used, and governed in ways that enable trustworthy, free, and fair commerce; avoid unfair discrimination between, and ensure effective choice for, individual users; foster fair competition and encourage innovation; promote and protect human rights; and, foster societies where:
- Human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the well-being of all individuals are protected and promoted;
- All can connect to the Internet, no matter where they are located, including through increased access, affordability, and digital skills;
- Individuals and businesses can trust the safety and the confidentiality of the digital technologies they use and that their privacy is protected;
- Businesses of all sizes can innovate, compete, and thrive on their merits in a fair and competitive ecosys- tem;
- Infrastructure is designed to be secure, interoperable, reliable, and sustainable;
- Technology is used to promote pluralism and freedom of expression, sustainability, inclusive economic growth, and the fight against global climate change.
Principles to promote this Vision
The partners in this Declaration intend to uphold a range of key principles, set out below, regarding the In- ternet and digital technologies; to promote these principles within existing multilateral and multistakeholder fora; to translate these principles into concrete policies and actions; and, work together to promote this vision globally, while respecting each other's regulatory autonomy within our own jurisdictions and in accordance with our respective domestic laws and international legal obligations. These principles are not legally binding but should rather be used as a reference for public policy makers, as well as citizens, businesses, and civil society organizations.
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
- Dedicate ourselves, in conducting and executing our respective domestic authorities, to respect human rights, including as reflected in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as well as the principles of the rule of law, legitimate purpose, non-arbitrariness, effective oversight, and transparency, both online and offline, and call upon others to do the same.
- Promote online safety and continue to strengthen our work to combat violence online, including sexual and gender-based violence as well as child sexual exploitation, to make the Internet a safe and secure place for everyone, particularly women, children, and young people.
- Promote safe and equitable use of the Internet for everyone, without discrimination based on sex, race, color, ethnic, national or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of an indigenous population, property, birth, disability, age, gender identity or sex- ual orientation.
- Reaffirm our commitment that actions taken by governments, authorities, and digital services including online platforms to reduce illegal and harmful content and activities online be consistent with inter- national human rights law, including the right to freedom of expression while encouraging diversity of opinion, and pluralism without fear of censorship, harassment, or intimidation.
- Protect and respect human rights and fundamental freedoms across the digital ecosystem, while provid- ing access to meaningful remedies for human rights violations and abuses, consistent with international human rights law.
- Refrain from misusing or abusing the Internet or algorithmic tools or techniques for unlawful surveillance, oppression, and repression that do not align with international human rights principles, including devel- oping social score cards or other mechanisms of domestic social control or pre-crime detention and arrest. A Global Internet
- Refrain from government-imposed internet shutdowns or degrading domestic Internet access, either en- tirely or partially. - Refrain from blocking or degrading access to lawful content, services, and applications on the Internet, consistent with principles of Net Neutrality subject to applicable law, including international human rights law.
- Promote our work to realize the benefits of data free flows with trust based on our shared values as like-minded, democratic, open and outward looking partners.
- Promote cooperation in research and innovation and standard setting, encourage information sharing re- garding security threats through relevant international fora, and reaffirm our commitment to the frame- work of responsible state behavior in cyberspace.
Inclusive and Affordable Access to the Internet
- Promote affordable, inclusive, and reliable access to the Internet for individuals and businesses where they need it and support efforts to close digital divides around the world to ensure all people of the world are able to benefit from the digital transformation.
- Support digital literacy, skills acquisition, and development so that individuals can overcome the digital di- vide, participate in the Internet safely, and realize the economic and social potential of the digital economy.
- Foster greater exposure to diverse cultural and multilingual content, information, and news online. Ex- posure to diverse content online should contribute to pluralistic public discourse, foster greater social and digital inclusion within society, bolster resilience to disinformation and misinformation, and in- crease participation in democratic processes.
Trust in the Digital Ecosystem
- Work together to combat cybercrime, including cyber-enabled crime, and deter malicious cyber activity.
- Ensure that government and relevant authorities' access to personal data is based in law and conducted in accordance with international human rights law.
- Protect individuals' privacy, their personal data, the confidentiality of electronic communications and in- formation on end-users' electronic devices, consistent with the protection of public safety and applicable domestic and international law.
- Promote the protection of consumers, in particular vulnerable consumers, from online scams and other unfair practices online and from dangerous and unsafe products sold online.
- Promote and use trustworthy network infrastructure and services suppliers, relying on risk-based assess- ments that include technical and non-technical factors for network security.
- Refrain from using the Internet to undermine the electoral infrastructure, elections and political pro cesses, including through covert information manipulation campaigns.cesses, including through covert information manipulation campaigns.
- Support a rules-based global digital economy which fosters trade and contestable and fair online markets so that firms and entrepreneurs can compete on their merits.
- Cooperate to maximize the enabling effects of technology for combatting climate change and protecting the environment whilst reducing as much as possible the environmental footprint of the Internet and digital technologies.
Multistakeholder Internet Governance
- Protect and strengthen the multistakeholder system of Internet governance, including the development, deployment, and management of its main technical protocols and other related standards and protocols.
- Refrain from undermining the technical infrastructure essential to the general availability and integrity of the Internet. We believe that the principles for the future of the Internet are universal in nature and as such we invite those who share this vision to affirm these principles and join us in the im- plementation of this vision. This Declaration takes into account, and expects to contribute to, existing processes in the UN system, G7, G20, the Organisation for Economic Cooper- ation and Development, the World Trade Organization, and other relevant multilateral and multistakeholder fora, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, Internet Governance Forum, and Freedom Online Coalition. We also welcome partner- ship with the many civil society organizations essential to promoting an open, free, global, interoperable, reliable, and secure Internet, and defending fundamental freedoms and human rights online. Partners in this Declaration intend to consult and work closely with stakeholders in carrying forward this vision.
MY COMMENT: Look over the part about disinformation, interfering with elections and "causing harm". It's over folks. "Disinformation" is that which they don't like, "interfering with elections" means telling the truth about candidates the MSM has lied about and subsequently pointing out vote fraud, and "causing harm" means pointing out the perpetrators of permitted crimes like slave trades, child sacrifice, the grove, corrupt politicians and deals - the whole 9 yards. IT IS OVER.
MY FINAL ANSWER: THIS IS A ROTTED PIG WRAPPED IN A FANCY QUILT. IF THIS GETS ENFORCED IT IS OVER. THE SHITHOLE COUNTRIES THAT SIGNED ONTO THIS ARE:
Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Estonia, the European Commission, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Kosovo, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, North Macedonia, Palau, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Trinidad and Tobago, the United Kingdom, the United States, Ukraine, and Uruguay.
The reason why this was done is to stop people, who even after being de-monetized, fought tooth and nail to keep actual reality - rather than what the tribe wanted pushed - in the spotlight. Now anyone who stayed standing after de-monetization will simply be called "disinfo", "harmful" or "in opposition to 'fair' elections" and they will be banned for that alone. Defunding did not work well enough because too many people were committed enough to make sacrifices to keep what was factually accurate on the table. Now the real scammers and cheats are going to have it their way:
http://198.46.190.126/images/nodisinfo.png
NOT RUMOR: POLICIES AGAINST "DISINFORMATION" NOW AGREED ON BY 60 NATIONS.
Permalink
Fortunately I am not physically in one of those 60 countries, my most powerful server is not in one of those countries and two other servers are not either. Iceland, which is on the list, already tried to shut this web site down TWICE, and only failed because I had servers elsewhere operating off direct IP. I have experience with this topic, this document which fakes being "protective" is in fact a lethal weapon against the truth.
http://www.jimstoneindia.com/pagesq22022...istry.html
MARK MY WORD: Q will NEVER be banned by the all new "ministry of truth"
The white hat gitmo garbage will NEVER be banned by either the ministry of truth OR the 60 countries that decided to join them by "fighting disinfo" on the web. They will need a false front to make it appear as if they are being even handed, so they will allow fantasy to be posted, some of it even appearing to be legit, while they ban anyone who actually uncovers damaging topics that are real and "should not be mentioned".
I have a big writeup about the Gitmo white hats "hanging the bad guys at Gitmo" below the very lengthy 60 nations joining the ministry of truth post . The "hanging the bad guys" post starts where I call it a garbage topic that should not even be on this site. It mentions the French elections and more and ends with a capture from BIN.
I called it right by putting the new main page for this site in India because India did not go along with the 60 nations that will now start censoring "disinformation" as whoever defines "disinformation" decides to define it.
DO NOT give out food if tshtf
A STRONG WARNING of the tactics that will be used by unscrupulous people looking to loot and rob:
You will get a knock on the door from a woman with a child begging for you to feed them if you can. If you feed them, here is what will happen: A team of men will arrive, probably shoot you, and they will take everything you have. When TSHTF YOU HAVE NOTHING. If you decide to do anything in the way of charity, you do it in a way where your location cannot be identified and you then slip back into the shadows, with no one knowing anything about you at all. I hate to say it, but the Mexican immigrants will be by far the worst with this. They absolutely WILL use that tactic, once when I was charitable Claudia told me we have to leave the area immediately or we will get robbed because all I did was prove I was probably worth robbing. There would be no thanks or gratitude at all, only a resource to be robbed.
DO NOT expect America to be any different when tshtf, if you have food DO NOT ADVERTISE IT and don't sit there like a target with the lights on when no one else has lights also.
The old school whites might be a lot safer to give to, but it is not guaranteed and when it comes to the immigrants, you might as well just shoot yourself in the head, give to them and you will be a GONER. That's according to Claudia. She's definitely right, don't expect her to be stupid on that topic.
http://198.46.190.126/images/cadgeneral.png
The "Ministry of truth" Hit a snag.
Rep Lauren Boebert has introduced legislation to totally de-fund the newly created ministry of truth. Is she legit and will it work? Time will tell but the linked Twitter vid looks like a campaign ad, "Hey everybody, I stood up for you!!!". Time will tell and zero points given if it does not fly.
https://twitter.com/SPepper1964/status/1...1161043973
WHAT IF PUTIN IS NOT REALLY GOING IN FOR CANCER SURGERY, BUT HE'D RATHER HAVE PATRUSHEV OVERSEE WORLD WAR 3 WHILE HE SITS IN A HOLE SOMEWHERE
Patrushev being put in charge is BAD NEWS folks, it likely means Russia is now actually going to do something BIG. See the next post, it explains what is going on.
I will be posting some images in the webp format to see if it is worthwhile. If anyone has any trouble viewing them, send a message.
The first Webp image is Putin and Nikolai Patrushev in the report immediately below. If you see a broken image link or no image at all, send a message.
The New York Post has reported that Putin is going in for cancer surgery
During his time at the hospital he will hand control over to Nikolai Patrushev, head of the Russian federal police's Security Council.
I was skeptical of reports of Putin's bad health because one of the rules of war played by the West is to portray your enemy as weak and sick. So I am still a bit skeptical but such claims would be brazen if not true so they probably are true. Who knows. But one thing is certain, - we had all probably better hope Putin survives this surgery.
Patrushev is a hard line communist that does not play ball with B.S. and if he gets in charge it will be his goal to totally dissolve Ukraine and take Europe - and then the world. That has been his lifelong dream and the only thing holding him back is Putin. I find it highly probable that Putin picked him as his substitute for precisely that reason - to send a strong message: Yes, I am down and out but the man in charge knows the entire Russian military so well he practically built it. And he wants to eat you. Who do you want in charge? Kind temperate ME or THAT GUY???
Just look at this photo. Who would you rather do war with? Kind fuzzy guy or that vulture looking thing?
http://198.46.190.126/images/putinpatrushev.webp
Russia is releasing half true half false nuclear war propaganda
This is pure propaganda. They talk about how the sarmat would wipe out Britain in one launch. That's actually true. But then they follow up with their poseidon nuclear torpedo and tell a half baked truth. It is true that the missile would cause a 500 meter (1650 foot) tsunami that would devastate Britain, but they then claim the wave would be radioactive and that it would completely swamp Britain. Though it would swamp much of britain it would not sink the entire country. Since the water the poseidon nuke pushed on to make the tsunami would not be the actual water that washed ashore, it is highly doubtful the tsunami would carry any meaningful radiation at all also.
I am not saying Russia is spewing total BS, but they are hamming it up quite a bit to be sure. The question then is, if the actual effects of the weapons are bad enough to get a good deterrent (a 500 meter tsunami would wipe out so much of Britain that all military potential would be gone) why exaggerate so much? That's enough to make me question the whole thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4eJvwtQJu4
http://198.46.190.126/images/dogondog.jpg
The teacher's grade was a politically motivated decision . . . . .
http://198.46.190.126/images/commieswine.jpg
ROWE V WADE OVERTURNED
Why have pesky abortion stats prove the clotshot sterilized over half the women? There is a report on what is happening to Rowe V Wade HERE.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02...n-00029473
MY COMMENT: THE SUPREME COURT IS MAKING DESPERATE STABS AT LEGITIMACY AFTER ENABLING AND ABETTING THE THEFT OF THE ELECTION, AND THIS IS AN EXTREME EXAMPLE. THIS WAS ALSO DONE TO COVER UP HOW MANY WOMEN WERE RENDERED STERILE BY THE CLOT SHOT, THEY CANNOT HAVE THAT SHOW UP IN THE ABORTION STATS. You can assume the court has nothing good at play here and that they did this to fake legitimacy and do a coverup. They will probably let the states decide also. They probably figure they have the population they want destroyed adequately wiped out by the vax and since virtually all the women who were vaxxed are now sterile, who needs Rowe V Wade?? The mission has been accomplished.
Who needs abortion clinics anymore when the only women who can get pregnant now were smart enough to avoid the vax and would never get an abortion anyway? Canned parenthood is going to belly up so they might as well ban abortion before the abortion stats show how many women were rendered sterile by the vax.
REPEAT:
THEY OVERTURNED ROWE V. WADE FOR THE EXPLICIT REASON THAT THE ABORTION STATS ARE GOING TO PLUMMET DUE TO HOW MANY WOMEN CAN'T GET PREGNANT ANYMORE AFTER THE VAX AND THEY DON'T WANT PEOPLE ASKING QUESTIONS. SO TO COVER IT UP, THEY BANNED ABORTION. IT IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT, THIS DID NOT COME OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF THEIR HEARTS. IT WAS EXPLICITLY DONE AS A COVERUP.
FACT: THE DEATH JAB CLOT SHOT PUT THE ABORTION INDUSTRY OUT OF BUSINESS ANYWAY SO WHY NOT LIE AND SAY YOU BANNED ABORTIONS AND THAT MAKES UP FOR THE STOLEN ELECTION? YOU GAIN BROWNIE POINTS PLUS COVER UP THE FACT THAT THE WOMEN WHO WOULD HAVE HAD ABORTIONS CAN'T GET PREGNANT ANYMORE ANYWAY.
If you see that posted elsewhere, it was posted here first. And it WILL be posted elsewhere because this move is TOO DAMN OBVIOUS, they DO NOT have the goodness in their hearts for such a ruling absent a nefarious reason, and clotshot coverup IS THAT REASON.
Bitcoin might now be possible for donations.
I figured I could never do bitcoin like that because in the past Mexico made it impossible. However, I just checked again to see if anything changed and now a major store chain that is everywhere set up bitpay and it (might) be possible to redeem bitcoin there now.
So I would like to request someone to try to send a small amount through Bitcoin to this key: bc1qnz5gm3k6wg3397snlypke8gza5wp67833h9pkw Only send a small amount and only send bitcoin because the key is not compatible with other cryptos. I have never done Bitcoin because it has been impossible to do in Mex and do not know if this will even work or be recoverable so if you decide to do this, only send enough to test the system to see if this will even work. ALSO, make sure you send a mail confirming what you sent to [email protected] so I will know if something failed. If this works, it will make Paypal less important.
Thanks!
Soy is not food, and that's the last thing "they" would ever burn. That's what we are supposed to be migrating to. The facility operators have stated that the fire, which took place in a large soy bin, will not affect operations at all. SO IT IS NOT NEWS. I skipped it for a reason and only posted this because Infowars considered it a crisis (when it is not) and I did not want people to think I missed this story. If something is not here the chance I actually missed it is very small, more likely is that I read through to the details and said "Non story". And this is a non-story. Yes, there have been fires at food processing plants lately but not enough to impact anything and the plane crash one was total BUNK. That was a plane crash story, not a food supply story.
How did this get 35,000+ views????
I know how. Now watch it NOT happen.
Several readers are VERY upset by the following post. To that I say, WATCH ME BE RIGHT. How will those "insiders"look when the following ends up as, as I state it will, a steaming pile of dung???
Being a true insider means you call bullshit on bullshit before it is proven bullshit, not after!!! I am "not out of the loop", I am only "out of the loop of bullshit". FINAL ANSWER.
THE BENCHMARK: TRUMP REINSTATED ON MAY 5TH. If that does not happen, the WHOLE THING IS BULLSHIT. And when that becomes an embarrassment the clickbaitable morons will click through to the next bullshit that spews from the same bullshitters, bowing down and worshiping the all new bullshit like info ewoks before an EFFING GOLDEN ROBOT.
The "ministry of truth is not going to ban stuff like this because it will prove "they are allowing the other side to speak" while absolutely nothing but BS is spewed from "alt media". After 5 or so fails like this soon to be fail, anyone who might dabble in alternate opinions is going to shut them off forever. Meanwhile those in alt media who are mortified by crap like this will be banned.
I am only making a big deal of this because it fits today's rant (down past the next (very lengthy) post - it fits it so perfectly. THIS IS WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT, RIGHT HERE:
http://198.46.190.126/images/binbs.png
Here are my forecasted prerequisites for a Trump re-instatement on May 5: Biden&co get 10 hour advance notice of a nuclear strike and then tell Trump to show up at the white house within 10 hours because "they give up" while they run to their tunnels hoping to con Trump into soaking up the heat. That's about what it would take. Maybe the nuclear strike will happen but Trump sure as hell won't be president again.
This is the end of this post. It was originally spread all over the page in pieces and then assembled out of order because it read better that way.
http://www.jimstone.is/trusttheplan.png
We just saw Macron get rigged in Biden style. Yes, the same thing happened:
http://194.233.91.97/photos/votingisfiction.jpg
If even after the same vote magic happened in France that happened with Trump you think your vote matters and you can make a difference, if you really think white hats are in charge holding secret trials while we are all being saved without us even knowing it AFTER HILLARY GOT HUNG AND RE APPEARED 5 TIMES, - If you think we are being saved when the white hats can't fix even election security ANYWHERE after what happened in the U.S last time and they go ahead and steal it the exact same way elsewhere without repercussions, you are a SUCKER. No, at this point more than that, a bottom feeder waiting for someone to flush the toilet on a boat so you can eat.
http://198.46.190.126/images/suckerfish.jpg
As Russia prepares to nuke us, Biden declares he is vice president to Obama (who has been "hung at Gitmo by white hats" multiple times) while Obama is right there grimacing an "oops". Aah yes, there is plenty to eat on the bottom, that fish looks quite healthy.
Now, about that election in France . . . . .
A reader sent:
The voting scam method can also be seen in real-time military exercises.
I witnessed twice in S. Korea their yearly joint-force nationwide training exercise totally fake victory.
A huge part of the scenario involves locating and evacuating civilian personnel (military families and teachers, for example). The computer calculations take into account available civilian boats, planes, anything else available for rapid use, and then combine with number of people being evacuated.
Both times the numbers of civilian personnel dwarfed the available amount of transports, even on the final day.
Yet the very next morning when the tabulations are finalized, we'd declare victory against the N. Koreans as well as full successful evacuation of civilians. When I'd ask how that was possible I was always told to shut up.
Fake numbers. Fake government. Fake military.
If people would only realize.
The following long spiel is for a garbage topic that should not even be on this site. The spiel uses examples of several topics and ends where the food factory fire post is.
The "ministry of truth" will sure love the Gitmo morons, - they will NEVER get banned because there is no substance and they are therefore harmless. They are absolutely PERFECT to use in a game of pretending to allow alt voices to be heard, while anyone with good info will get flushed.
Why on earth did I put so much time and page space into refuting the GITMO white hat bullshitters? I don't know, but I was not drunk.
http://www.jimstoneindia.com/pagesq22022/bullshit.html
Permalink for this rebuttal of page polluting bullshit. Why would anyone of any creedence bother with the topic? Why did I?
A reader sent:
"I am amazed at the number of morons who embrace the obvious disinformation about hangings at Gitmo, etc. It's actually horrifying to see people encourage and even cheer the notion of secret trials and executions.
My response: That is not bad at all. What is bad is when Hillary has been hung 5 times and Obama 3, while Hillary is fresh off an adrenochrome surge and complete baby blood transfusions, so fresh she's not sh*tting diapers anymore and is instead talking about running for president!!!
FOR THE RECORD: There are no hangings at Gitmo. Absolutely no one from the cabal has fallen. Not even Epstein, he's back on his island after a fake suicide where they swapped out Anthony Bourdain for the photos. We are in the era where evil has been unleashed and only the good die young. Pillow guy? Are you kidding me? Buy a pillow from him, not the bullshit!!! The pillows are still good.
THIS IS LEGIT FOLKS, READ IT AND WEEP. While claiming to protect free speech, "disinformation" will not be allowed. What is disinformation? Disinformation is the wrong information, true or not. Fat chance anyone will ever be able to now point out where the root of the problems are. The full text follows.
A Declaration for the Future of the Internet
We are united by a belief in the potential of digital technologies to promote con- nectivity, democracy, peace, the rule of law, sustainable development, and the en- joyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms. As we increasingly work, com- municate, connect, engage, learn, and enjoy leisure time using digital technologies, our reliance on an open, free, global, interoperable, reliable, and secure Internet will continue to grow. Yet we are also aware of the risks inherent in that reliance and the challenges we face.
We call for a new Declaration for the Future of the Internet that includes all partners who actively support a future for the Internet that is an open, free, global, interoperable, reli- able, and secure. We further affirm our commitment to protecting and respecting human rights online and across the digital ecosystem. Partners in this Declaration intend to work toward an environment that reinforces our democratic systems and promotes active par- ticipation of every citizen in democratic processes, secures and protects individuals' priva cy, maintains secure and reliable connectivity, resists efforts to splinter the global Internet, and promotes a free and competitive global economy. Partners in this Declaration invite other partners who share this vision to join us in working together, with civil society and other stakeholders, to affirm guiding principles for our role in the future of the global In ternet.
Reclaiming the Promise of the Internet
The immense promise that accompanied the development of the Internet stemmed from its design: it is an open "network of networks", a single interconnected communications system for all of humanity. The stable and secure operation of the Internet's unique identifier systems have, from the beginning, been governed by a multistakeholder approach to avoid Internet fragmentation, which continues to be an essential part of our vision. For business, entrepreneurs, and the innovation ecosystem as a whole, interconnection promises better access to customers and fairer competition; for artists and creators, new audiences; for everyone, unfettered access to knowledge. With the creation of the Internet came a swell in innovation, vibrant communication, increased cross-border data flows, and market growth - as well as the invention of new digital products and services that now permeate every aspect of our daily lives.
Over the last two decades, however, we have witnessed serious challenges to this vision emerge. Access to the open Internet is limited by some authoritarian governments and online platforms and digital tools are increasingly used to repress freedom of expression and deny other human rights and fundamental freedoms. State-sponsored or condoned malicious behavior is on the rise, including the spread of disinformation and cybercrimes such as ransomware, affecting the security and the resilience of critical infrastructure while holding at risk vital public and private assets. At the same time, countries have erected firewalls and taken other technical measures, such as Internet shutdowns, to restrict access to journalism, information, and services, in ways that are contrary to international human rights commitments and obligations. Concerted or independent actions of some governments and private actors have sought to abuse the openness of Inter- net governance and related processes to advance a closed vision. Moreover, the once decentralized Internet economy has become highly concentrated and many people have legitimate concerns about their privacy and the quantity and security of personal data collected and stored online. Online platforms have enabled an increase in the spread of illegal or harmful content that can threaten the safety of individuals and contribute to radicalization and violence. Disinformation and foreign malign activity is used to sow division and conflict between individuals or groups in society, undermining respect for and protection of human rights and demo- cratic institutions.
Our Vision
We believe we should meet these challenges by working towards a shared vision for the future of the Inter- net that recommits governments and relevant authorities to defending human rights and fostering equitable economic prosperity. We intend to ensure that the use of digital technologies reinforces, not weakens, de- mocracy and respect for human rights; offers opportunities for innovation in the digital ecosystem, including businesses large and small; and, maintains connections between our societies. We intend to work together to protect and fortify the multistakeholder system of Internet governance and to maintain a high level of securi- ty, privacy protection, stability and resilience of the technical infrastructure of the Internet.
We affirm our commitment to promote and sustain an Internet that: is an open, free, global, interoperable, re- liable, and secure and to ensure that the Internet reinforces democratic principles and human rights and fun- damental freedoms; offers opportunities for collaborative research and commerce; is developed, governed, and deployed in an inclusive way so that unserved and underserved communities, particularly those coming online for the first time, can navigate it safely and with personal data privacy and protections in place; and is governed by multistakeholder processes. In short, an Internet that can deliver on the promise of connecting humankind and helping societies and democracies to thrive.
The Internet should operate as a single, decentralized network of networks - with global reach and gov- erned through the multistakeholder approach, whereby governments and relevant authorities partner with academics, civil society, the private sector, technical community and others. Digital technologies reliant on the Internet, will yield the greatest dividends when they operate as an open, free, global, interoperable, re- liable, and secure systems. Digital technologies should be produced, used, and governed in ways that enable trustworthy, free, and fair commerce; avoid unfair discrimination between, and ensure effective choice for, individual users; foster fair competition and encourage innovation; promote and protect human rights; and, foster societies where:
- Human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the well-being of all individuals are protected and promoted;
- All can connect to the Internet, no matter where they are located, including through increased access, affordability, and digital skills;
- Individuals and businesses can trust the safety and the confidentiality of the digital technologies they use and that their privacy is protected;
- Businesses of all sizes can innovate, compete, and thrive on their merits in a fair and competitive ecosys- tem;
- Infrastructure is designed to be secure, interoperable, reliable, and sustainable;
- Technology is used to promote pluralism and freedom of expression, sustainability, inclusive economic growth, and the fight against global climate change.
Principles to promote this Vision
The partners in this Declaration intend to uphold a range of key principles, set out below, regarding the In- ternet and digital technologies; to promote these principles within existing multilateral and multistakeholder fora; to translate these principles into concrete policies and actions; and, work together to promote this vision globally, while respecting each other's regulatory autonomy within our own jurisdictions and in accordance with our respective domestic laws and international legal obligations. These principles are not legally binding but should rather be used as a reference for public policy makers, as well as citizens, businesses, and civil society organizations.
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
- Dedicate ourselves, in conducting and executing our respective domestic authorities, to respect human rights, including as reflected in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as well as the principles of the rule of law, legitimate purpose, non-arbitrariness, effective oversight, and transparency, both online and offline, and call upon others to do the same.
- Promote online safety and continue to strengthen our work to combat violence online, including sexual and gender-based violence as well as child sexual exploitation, to make the Internet a safe and secure place for everyone, particularly women, children, and young people.
- Promote safe and equitable use of the Internet for everyone, without discrimination based on sex, race, color, ethnic, national or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of an indigenous population, property, birth, disability, age, gender identity or sex- ual orientation.
- Reaffirm our commitment that actions taken by governments, authorities, and digital services including online platforms to reduce illegal and harmful content and activities online be consistent with inter- national human rights law, including the right to freedom of expression while encouraging diversity of opinion, and pluralism without fear of censorship, harassment, or intimidation.
- Protect and respect human rights and fundamental freedoms across the digital ecosystem, while provid- ing access to meaningful remedies for human rights violations and abuses, consistent with international human rights law.
- Refrain from misusing or abusing the Internet or algorithmic tools or techniques for unlawful surveillance, oppression, and repression that do not align with international human rights principles, including devel- oping social score cards or other mechanisms of domestic social control or pre-crime detention and arrest. A Global Internet
- Refrain from government-imposed internet shutdowns or degrading domestic Internet access, either en- tirely or partially. - Refrain from blocking or degrading access to lawful content, services, and applications on the Internet, consistent with principles of Net Neutrality subject to applicable law, including international human rights law.
- Promote our work to realize the benefits of data free flows with trust based on our shared values as like-minded, democratic, open and outward looking partners.
- Promote cooperation in research and innovation and standard setting, encourage information sharing re- garding security threats through relevant international fora, and reaffirm our commitment to the frame- work of responsible state behavior in cyberspace.
Inclusive and Affordable Access to the Internet
- Promote affordable, inclusive, and reliable access to the Internet for individuals and businesses where they need it and support efforts to close digital divides around the world to ensure all people of the world are able to benefit from the digital transformation.
- Support digital literacy, skills acquisition, and development so that individuals can overcome the digital di- vide, participate in the Internet safely, and realize the economic and social potential of the digital economy.
- Foster greater exposure to diverse cultural and multilingual content, information, and news online. Ex- posure to diverse content online should contribute to pluralistic public discourse, foster greater social and digital inclusion within society, bolster resilience to disinformation and misinformation, and in- crease participation in democratic processes.
Trust in the Digital Ecosystem
- Work together to combat cybercrime, including cyber-enabled crime, and deter malicious cyber activity.
- Ensure that government and relevant authorities' access to personal data is based in law and conducted in accordance with international human rights law.
- Protect individuals' privacy, their personal data, the confidentiality of electronic communications and in- formation on end-users' electronic devices, consistent with the protection of public safety and applicable domestic and international law.
- Promote the protection of consumers, in particular vulnerable consumers, from online scams and other unfair practices online and from dangerous and unsafe products sold online.
- Promote and use trustworthy network infrastructure and services suppliers, relying on risk-based assess- ments that include technical and non-technical factors for network security.
- Refrain from using the Internet to undermine the electoral infrastructure, elections and political pro cesses, including through covert information manipulation campaigns.cesses, including through covert information manipulation campaigns.
- Support a rules-based global digital economy which fosters trade and contestable and fair online markets so that firms and entrepreneurs can compete on their merits.
- Cooperate to maximize the enabling effects of technology for combatting climate change and protecting the environment whilst reducing as much as possible the environmental footprint of the Internet and digital technologies.
Multistakeholder Internet Governance
- Protect and strengthen the multistakeholder system of Internet governance, including the development, deployment, and management of its main technical protocols and other related standards and protocols.
- Refrain from undermining the technical infrastructure essential to the general availability and integrity of the Internet. We believe that the principles for the future of the Internet are universal in nature and as such we invite those who share this vision to affirm these principles and join us in the im- plementation of this vision. This Declaration takes into account, and expects to contribute to, existing processes in the UN system, G7, G20, the Organisation for Economic Cooper- ation and Development, the World Trade Organization, and other relevant multilateral and multistakeholder fora, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, Internet Governance Forum, and Freedom Online Coalition. We also welcome partner- ship with the many civil society organizations essential to promoting an open, free, global, interoperable, reliable, and secure Internet, and defending fundamental freedoms and human rights online. Partners in this Declaration intend to consult and work closely with stakeholders in carrying forward this vision.
MY COMMENT: Look over the part about disinformation, interfering with elections and "causing harm". It's over folks. "Disinformation" is that which they don't like, "interfering with elections" means telling the truth about candidates the MSM has lied about and subsequently pointing out vote fraud, and "causing harm" means pointing out the perpetrators of permitted crimes like slave trades, child sacrifice, the grove, corrupt politicians and deals - the whole 9 yards. IT IS OVER.
MY FINAL ANSWER: THIS IS A ROTTED PIG WRAPPED IN A FANCY QUILT. IF THIS GETS ENFORCED IT IS OVER. THE SHITHOLE COUNTRIES THAT SIGNED ONTO THIS ARE:
Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Estonia, the European Commission, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Kosovo, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, North Macedonia, Palau, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Trinidad and Tobago, the United Kingdom, the United States, Ukraine, and Uruguay.
The reason why this was done is to stop people, who even after being de-monetized, fought tooth and nail to keep actual reality - rather than what the tribe wanted pushed - in the spotlight. Now anyone who stayed standing after de-monetization will simply be called "disinfo", "harmful" or "in opposition to 'fair' elections" and they will be banned for that alone. Defunding did not work well enough because too many people were committed enough to make sacrifices to keep what was factually accurate on the table. Now the real scammers and cheats are going to have it their way:
http://198.46.190.126/images/nodisinfo.png
NOT RUMOR: POLICIES AGAINST "DISINFORMATION" NOW AGREED ON BY 60 NATIONS.
Permalink
Fortunately I am not physically in one of those 60 countries, my most powerful server is not in one of those countries and two other servers are not either. Iceland, which is on the list, already tried to shut this web site down TWICE, and only failed because I had servers elsewhere operating off direct IP. I have experience with this topic, this document which fakes being "protective" is in fact a lethal weapon against the truth.
http://www.jimstoneindia.com/pagesq22022...istry.html
MARK MY WORD: Q will NEVER be banned by the all new "ministry of truth"
The white hat gitmo garbage will NEVER be banned by either the ministry of truth OR the 60 countries that decided to join them by "fighting disinfo" on the web. They will need a false front to make it appear as if they are being even handed, so they will allow fantasy to be posted, some of it even appearing to be legit, while they ban anyone who actually uncovers damaging topics that are real and "should not be mentioned".
I have a big writeup about the Gitmo white hats "hanging the bad guys at Gitmo" below the very lengthy 60 nations joining the ministry of truth post . The "hanging the bad guys" post starts where I call it a garbage topic that should not even be on this site. It mentions the French elections and more and ends with a capture from BIN.
I called it right by putting the new main page for this site in India because India did not go along with the 60 nations that will now start censoring "disinformation" as whoever defines "disinformation" decides to define it.
DO NOT give out food if tshtf
A STRONG WARNING of the tactics that will be used by unscrupulous people looking to loot and rob:
You will get a knock on the door from a woman with a child begging for you to feed them if you can. If you feed them, here is what will happen: A team of men will arrive, probably shoot you, and they will take everything you have. When TSHTF YOU HAVE NOTHING. If you decide to do anything in the way of charity, you do it in a way where your location cannot be identified and you then slip back into the shadows, with no one knowing anything about you at all. I hate to say it, but the Mexican immigrants will be by far the worst with this. They absolutely WILL use that tactic, once when I was charitable Claudia told me we have to leave the area immediately or we will get robbed because all I did was prove I was probably worth robbing. There would be no thanks or gratitude at all, only a resource to be robbed.
DO NOT expect America to be any different when tshtf, if you have food DO NOT ADVERTISE IT and don't sit there like a target with the lights on when no one else has lights also.
The old school whites might be a lot safer to give to, but it is not guaranteed and when it comes to the immigrants, you might as well just shoot yourself in the head, give to them and you will be a GONER. That's according to Claudia. She's definitely right, don't expect her to be stupid on that topic.
http://198.46.190.126/images/cadgeneral.png
The "Ministry of truth" Hit a snag.
Rep Lauren Boebert has introduced legislation to totally de-fund the newly created ministry of truth. Is she legit and will it work? Time will tell but the linked Twitter vid looks like a campaign ad, "Hey everybody, I stood up for you!!!". Time will tell and zero points given if it does not fly.
https://twitter.com/SPepper1964/status/1...1161043973
WHAT IF PUTIN IS NOT REALLY GOING IN FOR CANCER SURGERY, BUT HE'D RATHER HAVE PATRUSHEV OVERSEE WORLD WAR 3 WHILE HE SITS IN A HOLE SOMEWHERE
Patrushev being put in charge is BAD NEWS folks, it likely means Russia is now actually going to do something BIG. See the next post, it explains what is going on.
I will be posting some images in the webp format to see if it is worthwhile. If anyone has any trouble viewing them, send a message.
The first Webp image is Putin and Nikolai Patrushev in the report immediately below. If you see a broken image link or no image at all, send a message.
The New York Post has reported that Putin is going in for cancer surgery
During his time at the hospital he will hand control over to Nikolai Patrushev, head of the Russian federal police's Security Council.
I was skeptical of reports of Putin's bad health because one of the rules of war played by the West is to portray your enemy as weak and sick. So I am still a bit skeptical but such claims would be brazen if not true so they probably are true. Who knows. But one thing is certain, - we had all probably better hope Putin survives this surgery.
Patrushev is a hard line communist that does not play ball with B.S. and if he gets in charge it will be his goal to totally dissolve Ukraine and take Europe - and then the world. That has been his lifelong dream and the only thing holding him back is Putin. I find it highly probable that Putin picked him as his substitute for precisely that reason - to send a strong message: Yes, I am down and out but the man in charge knows the entire Russian military so well he practically built it. And he wants to eat you. Who do you want in charge? Kind temperate ME or THAT GUY???
Just look at this photo. Who would you rather do war with? Kind fuzzy guy or that vulture looking thing?
http://198.46.190.126/images/putinpatrushev.webp
Russia is releasing half true half false nuclear war propaganda
This is pure propaganda. They talk about how the sarmat would wipe out Britain in one launch. That's actually true. But then they follow up with their poseidon nuclear torpedo and tell a half baked truth. It is true that the missile would cause a 500 meter (1650 foot) tsunami that would devastate Britain, but they then claim the wave would be radioactive and that it would completely swamp Britain. Though it would swamp much of britain it would not sink the entire country. Since the water the poseidon nuke pushed on to make the tsunami would not be the actual water that washed ashore, it is highly doubtful the tsunami would carry any meaningful radiation at all also.
I am not saying Russia is spewing total BS, but they are hamming it up quite a bit to be sure. The question then is, if the actual effects of the weapons are bad enough to get a good deterrent (a 500 meter tsunami would wipe out so much of Britain that all military potential would be gone) why exaggerate so much? That's enough to make me question the whole thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4eJvwtQJu4
http://198.46.190.126/images/dogondog.jpg
The teacher's grade was a politically motivated decision . . . . .
http://198.46.190.126/images/commieswine.jpg
ROWE V WADE OVERTURNED
Why have pesky abortion stats prove the clotshot sterilized over half the women? There is a report on what is happening to Rowe V Wade HERE.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02...n-00029473
MY COMMENT: THE SUPREME COURT IS MAKING DESPERATE STABS AT LEGITIMACY AFTER ENABLING AND ABETTING THE THEFT OF THE ELECTION, AND THIS IS AN EXTREME EXAMPLE. THIS WAS ALSO DONE TO COVER UP HOW MANY WOMEN WERE RENDERED STERILE BY THE CLOT SHOT, THEY CANNOT HAVE THAT SHOW UP IN THE ABORTION STATS. You can assume the court has nothing good at play here and that they did this to fake legitimacy and do a coverup. They will probably let the states decide also. They probably figure they have the population they want destroyed adequately wiped out by the vax and since virtually all the women who were vaxxed are now sterile, who needs Rowe V Wade?? The mission has been accomplished.
Who needs abortion clinics anymore when the only women who can get pregnant now were smart enough to avoid the vax and would never get an abortion anyway? Canned parenthood is going to belly up so they might as well ban abortion before the abortion stats show how many women were rendered sterile by the vax.
REPEAT:
THEY OVERTURNED ROWE V. WADE FOR THE EXPLICIT REASON THAT THE ABORTION STATS ARE GOING TO PLUMMET DUE TO HOW MANY WOMEN CAN'T GET PREGNANT ANYMORE AFTER THE VAX AND THEY DON'T WANT PEOPLE ASKING QUESTIONS. SO TO COVER IT UP, THEY BANNED ABORTION. IT IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT, THIS DID NOT COME OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF THEIR HEARTS. IT WAS EXPLICITLY DONE AS A COVERUP.
FACT: THE DEATH JAB CLOT SHOT PUT THE ABORTION INDUSTRY OUT OF BUSINESS ANYWAY SO WHY NOT LIE AND SAY YOU BANNED ABORTIONS AND THAT MAKES UP FOR THE STOLEN ELECTION? YOU GAIN BROWNIE POINTS PLUS COVER UP THE FACT THAT THE WOMEN WHO WOULD HAVE HAD ABORTIONS CAN'T GET PREGNANT ANYMORE ANYWAY.
If you see that posted elsewhere, it was posted here first. And it WILL be posted elsewhere because this move is TOO DAMN OBVIOUS, they DO NOT have the goodness in their hearts for such a ruling absent a nefarious reason, and clotshot coverup IS THAT REASON.
Bitcoin might now be possible for donations.
I figured I could never do bitcoin like that because in the past Mexico made it impossible. However, I just checked again to see if anything changed and now a major store chain that is everywhere set up bitpay and it (might) be possible to redeem bitcoin there now.
So I would like to request someone to try to send a small amount through Bitcoin to this key: bc1qnz5gm3k6wg3397snlypke8gza5wp67833h9pkw Only send a small amount and only send bitcoin because the key is not compatible with other cryptos. I have never done Bitcoin because it has been impossible to do in Mex and do not know if this will even work or be recoverable so if you decide to do this, only send enough to test the system to see if this will even work. ALSO, make sure you send a mail confirming what you sent to [email protected] so I will know if something failed. If this works, it will make Paypal less important.
Thanks!