07-18-2007, 12:53 PM
By Ted Twietmeyer
[email protected]
7-16-7
NASA leadership needs an enema to help them in their desperate search for water on Mars.
Sounds gross? With all their pissing and moaning about "searching for signs of water" SOMEONE, somewhere should give NASA an enema. I can confidently speak for a great many people who are just plain SICK and TIRED of hearing this crap from them.
There is ABUNDANT evidence that mechanical artifacts of all kinds litter the planet. We'll talk more about that later and look at some of imaging proof.
This review is about "Roving Mars" by Walt Disney Productions and aired on the Science Channel on July 14th, 2007.
This documentary was preceded by another one-hour-wonder titled "Revealing Mars" where ever-thirsty NASA rambled on about "searching for water." Anything you read below shown in double quotes is a direct quotation from the documentary. I have strived to make every one of these as accurate as possible right down to some incredibly UN-scientific language. Get the idea I'm under- impressed by the documentary? Now why would you think that?
This one began with standard issue line, "Mars is desolate, dry and barren." So what about the polar ice which is so massive it can be seen from Earth 40 million miles away?
I guess ICE doesn't count. Supposedly it's frozen carbon dioxide, but since Mars reaches temperatures equivalent to the southern United States on almost any summer day this doesn't seem likely.
And away we go fast talking Steven Squyres of Cornell babbles "you must be a geologist to see if Mars once supported life. Only JPL could build a rover to do this" he claims. He claims that "this place is almost sacred" while pictures from JPL were shown.
Yes, he's right. Only JPL could build a rover with built-in crash- able software. Leave it to the script kiddies of this engineering generation, not to learn ONE SINGLE LESSON from an earlier generation. But as we shall see, they came CRAWLING to engineers of the past generation to get their butts out of a software ringer.
The documentary showed video clips of rovers being assembled in a clean (which will land on a dirty, dusty planet.) One engineer stated it is "the Origami Spacecraft" to get everything folded into a small space. "Two-thirds of the missions since the sixties have failed" Squyres proclaimed. We heard over and over how hard it is to get a mission successfully to Mars. Good move. Keep telling everyone this so when you SCREW UP and something goes wrong, you can blame the space gods
Hard to get something to Mars? BULL-CRAP! With EARLY 1970's technology two Vikings were sent to Mars. BOTH spacecraft not only landed safely, but continued working correctly and transmitting data well past their design life. Was this mentioned in this documentary? Of course not. These two vehicles didn't have fast processors, only had a few thousand bytes of memory but they spoke volumes about the not-so-red planet.
Did I forget to mention? NASA has scientific proof that Mars ISN'T RED at all. (See [1] for more info.)
"Two of the last missions were failures" Squyres bragged after moaning about other Mars mission failures. "Spirit was our first baby" he stated after taking about numerous previous failures. "We under-estimated the size and weight of the rovers" he proclaimed. "The airbags are like the airbags in your car, but way more expensive. The first time we tested the airbags, they tore open and deflated" according to Squyres.
Now that's something brag about.
His Highness continued, "Mars is a tough place to send a spacecraft. The average temperature is -60f." If this is true, then HOW did engineers 35 years ago accomplish it?
And did it quite well without the microprocessors and technology we have today? Here's a news flash Mr. Squyres those missions 35 years ago were the result of CAREFUL, COMMON SENSE engineering. He never ventures anywhere close to the Viking topic.
Unless of course - the Viking missions were faked and the Spirit and Opportunity rovers really are the first vehicles to land on Mars. This is certainly a possibility.
A number of video clips were also shown with the instrumentation, cameras and rock tools undergoing tests in a clean room. Somewhat ironic, considering that the very first act of the rover is to wander off the landing vehicle INTO THE DIRT. But of course, we don't want to bring Earth microbes to Mars. But wait Mars can't support life right? I'm confused are you? If it really is as cold as NASA claims, then microbes from people won't have a chance.
One of the funniest parts of the documentary was fast-talking Squyres standing out in a simulated Mars desert with a group of school children standing beside a test rover. What was also interesting is that the color of the desert sand and rocks were reddish brown- and matched the fake color of Mars sent back to Earth in images. He cautions the children, "Be careful - it can start moving at anytime!" They move back like they are about to be run over by a tractor trailer. Sure thing Steven a moving rover is something to really worry about. What a deadly machine that is. NASA stated on their website that each day a rover can only move about 250ft. Even a paraplegic ant could get out of a rover's way.
Out in the desert, a long umbilical cable connected the test rover to a laptop about 60ft. away sitting on a metal table (which looked exactly like those you find in the kitchen of a cafeteria) and of course, 2 men wearing the obligatory white lab coats. It's well known in the medical profession that people inherently trust anyone wearing one. This is why all doctors wear one patients expect it. Like a sign of wisdom and authority perhaps?
One man was holding the cable off the ground, and the other one pretending to play with the laptop while looking at the screen. From the shadows under the blue and brilliant sky it looked like it was about midday. Could the man at the laptop even SEE the LCD screen? Who writes this stuff? To borrow a line from a popular TV show, "I don't think so Tim." I swear Tim the tool man must have been around somewhere out in that desert.
Back at the wind-tunnel we see the big drag chute which is used to slow the rover's descent through the atmosphere being deployed and tested. Several engineers are standing inside the tunnel along with the deafening, roaring wind noise, their clothing flapping in the wind while they are staring up at the motionless chute. You can almost read what they are thinking in their faces this thing just might work after all!
Spirit was launched first and Opportunity three weeks later. Klaxons sounded in bursts of three as the launch equipment moved away from the pad. At T minus 0 launch time off into space the Spirit rover space vehicle was sent, on its long journey to the "red planet." NASA animations were also shown with lots of new and cute CGI. They didn't miss a trick. During the mission in space, two balancing booms were deployed which rotated close to the virtual camera position. These booms made a "wampwampwamp" sound like that of a helicopter blade whizzing over your head sitting on the ground. Who could have known just how noisy the vacuum of space really is? I was watching this with the home theater system on as I wrote this, and the racket I heard from the silence of space was deafening. NASA has shown us that physics must be wrong I heard the noise from space with my own ears!
"Landing a spacecraft on Mars is so complicated and there are so many things that can go wrong" Squyres re-iterated yet gain. I guess the TWO successful Viking AND the TWO Voyager spacecraft missions never happened. After all, you need crashing Java software to reach Mars, right?
Seven months later, the vehicle began the multi-phase Mars landing. Watching the tortuous landing on Mars was like following a bouncing ball on steroids. It wasn't unlike a church meeting that can't afford enough hymnals and uses an overhead projector. At first there was no signal from the spacecraft. Everyone was silent. A proverbial hush fell over the crowd. Tension was high in the control roomthe women closed their eyes. when .suddenly there was a SIGNAL from Mars! (At least we all hope it was from Mars, and not a covert Mars facility on Earth somewhere!) One of the men got down on his knees and paid homage to the invisible God of Space. Everyone was hugging each othersmiling, jumping up and down, clapping and in general acting (like children) as if this was the FIRST time anything had landed on Mars without being destroyed. What the children in the control room didn't seem to remember is that they are 35 years too late. Viking and even earlier missions beat them to the finish line. I call that forgetfulness "Nasanesia." It's an insidious NASA-only amnesia syndrome, and can strike without warning at press conferences, during documentary interviews and at critical times in control rooms.
Early in the mission an "upgrade" based on the bug-ridden Java language almost totally excommunicated both rovers. And I do mean excommunicated in the literal sense. In a press conference NASA admitted they brought several engineers out of retirement to help them re-boot and recover control. This was only admitted when a reporter asked about how they did it (he probably already knew the answer.) It wasn't something they willingly admitted to. NASA engineers were so arrogant and self-assured with their management of both rovers, that they uploaded the defective Java code to BOTH rovers. This flies in the face of all common sense. You don't need an engineering degree to know enough to try it on only ONE of them first. But what the heck the taxpayers are paying for it so who cares if it causes a disaster? They could readily blame the loss on a contractor. Remember Morton-Thiokol and the Challenger?
But that's the common mentality of many engineers today. They know everything. Why else would they send this Java software upload to BOTH vehicles before it was well tested? Who with common sense would EVER do this? These engineers couldn't even fix what they designed. Were any of the Java problems mentioned in the documentary? Of course not. "That wouldn't be Cricket" as the British might say.
One of the funnier parts was the animated depiction of the sun in a Mars landing animation. On Earth, the apparent size of the sun is just slightly larger than our moon. Since Mars is an about 35-40 million miles further from the sun than Earth, it's size on Mars would logically be slightly smaller than the moon since we are already 93 million miles away. But the animations showed our Sun as a rinky-dink pinpoint of light - even though recorded Mars temperatures of 90F have been recorded. What's wrong with this picture? Where is the consistent science? It doesn't exist when it comes to Mars. And I have the images and data to prove it.
After yet another commercial break the Spirit rover landed, the airbags deflated, the panels opened, the rover "woke up" from a 7 month semi-slumber and the solar panels deployed. And there in the cheering crowd was the great Sean O'Keefe - the infamous short- lived NASA administrator (2001-2005.) I wonder who on Capitol Hill he ticked off. Perhaps he missed too many free mason meetings and was ostracized.
Squyres continued, "We sent Spirit to Gusev crater. It's 100 miles across." Wrong Steven! Gusev is 90 miles across according to your agency. But in science, who cares about accuracy when you're the big honcho, the big cheese, the top dog - the over-grown bully- boy on the block? I once had a television producer offer to take my book "What NASA Isn't Telling You About Mars" to Lord Squyres, and I responded with "if he refuses to discuss or announce any of the objects on Mars which he MUST know are there already, would he ever listen to a non-geologist like me?"
He continues, "We sent it [the rover] there to look for signs of sediment." There they go again looking for past "signs of water." Someone pass me a full enema bottle please!! I can't stand to hear this statement anymore.
But "signs of water" isn't the find of the century on the non- red planet it's the artifacts which are totally ignored. I filled a book with more than 200 images of these objects, most located only a few feet from the rover cameras. There are column capitals, mechanical objects, building blocks and much more. To date, no one has challenged any of the evidence. Not even His Highness Squyres, who probably hasn't even heard of the book.
Yet another brilliant statement was made showing the signs of a higher education than mine: "Driving the rover are these kind of googley-eyed cameras. They take in everything" Lord Squyres went on. Yes, he REALLY DID use the phrase "googley-eyed ." That highly scientific description came from a man with a PhD.
He continued, "A rock on the surface can undergo weathering, from sun, wind and humidity." Did you catch that? HUMIDITY. He already had stated that Mars is a dry planet. He continued, "We sent the rover off to visit some distant hills, not knowing if it would ever make it. The distance was farther than it was designed to go." But this is because it is where the vehicle was pre-destined it to land. And there was absolutely NOTHING there. No rocks. Nothing. Zip. Just dust. Only some beads which probably quickly exhausted the interest of Earth based scientists. These were nick-named "Blue-berries." Someone give me the enema bottle, PLEASE.
Then another Lucas-like ILM quality graphic rendering of Opportunity landing in Eagle crater was shown. What a dumb-ass idea it was to send Opportunity there. But in the decision process I witnessed, a roomful of scientists were given 5 possible landing sites ON THE ENTIRE PLANET of Mars to vote on. That's right some unseen group ALLOWED them to land only at one of these sites. About 30 scientists voted to select the two sites for the rovers to land at. This scene should have been featured in the film "JackAss." Was the Cydonia area with known pyramids, structures and the infamous face included on this map? Absolutely not. The unseen powers who control NASA weren't about to let any rovers near this area. It was pre-determined that supporters of intelligent life and a city at Cydonia were not going to be vindicated. Period. Do we hear the sound of running water somewhere or is that just wishful thinking?
Opportunity landed in a place of no opportunity at all, except for making a discovery of what Squyres stated as "Little round beads and little round things. They are perfect spheres. These beads are made of hematite, which forms only in LIQUID WATER" (there it goes again, that damned water obsession.) He further stated that "Ripples in the rocks" were found, meaning there was water at the surface. Water was apparently everywhere but was never seen directly by a rover camera as of this writing. Pass me that enema bottle again please. Steven and his people are in desperate need of a reverse drink.
Squyres went on,"Spirit, our blue collar rover lands in an awful rocky place. It had to literally climb a mountain on Mars. It worked more than 2 months before it found anything." A BLUE COLLAR WORKER ROBOT?
The chart below based on artifacts in images in the book covering each of the first 625 days. The first artifacts almost three years ago were photographed at 50 days into the Spirit rover's mission on the surface, which NASA has completely ignored to this day. Almost all of these artifacts were just a few yards from the Spirit rover camera.)
![[Image: bookchart1.JPG]](http://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/bookchart1.JPG)
Fig. 1 - Artifact summary chart from "What NASA Isn't Telling You About Mars" [2]
Zoom![[Image: zoom.gif]](http://www.rense.com/1.mpicons/zoom.gif)
![[Image: sol561bdetailsharpened.jpg]](http://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/sol561bdetailsharpened.jpg)
Fig. 2 One of dozens of artifacts found on Mars (More at [1]) Is this a possible building ornament? If so what archeologist's hand wrote a catalog number on it?
![[Image: The%20Thing.jpg]](http://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/The%20Thing.jpg)
Fig. 3 This amazing device was about 50ft. from the camera.
(Background carefully removed for clarity. More at [1])
![[Image: block.jpg]](http://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/block.jpg)
Fig. 4 - A dark block clearly showing white lettering (More at [1])
![[Image: mechanicalpart.jpg]](http://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/mechanicalpart.jpg)
Fig. 5 Mechanical part
And yet despite all this WATER is more important than finding intelligent life?
The narration continues about the future of the rovers which were designed to run just 90 days but are still doing well after more than 3 years: "The dust keeps forming and one day the rovers just won't wake up when the sun rises, because the solar panels will be covered with too much dust." Yet another lie the panels are BEING REGULARLY CLEANED all the time and NASA's own images prove this. The question is WHO is doing the cleaning? It's highly unlikely dust devils always do it in the nick of time.
Here is just one example of this - un-retouched images as proof from their computers:
![[Image: SO797solarpaneldirty.jpg]](http://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/SO797solarpaneldirty.jpg)
Fig. 6 - Dirty solar panel at 11:56:21 Mars time [2]
![[Image: SOL797solarpanelcleaned.jpg]](http://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/SOL797solarpanelcleaned.jpg)
Fig. 7 - Dirty Solar panel miraculously cleaned (by "dust devils"?) just 5 minutes later [2]
The TV special concluded with "This mission has given us a great opportunity to learn more about Mars, and more about ourselves." I could swear Steven's nose must have been growing longer by the minute while he did the show
Yes NASA, we HAVE learned a lot about ourselves.
We learned that the general public is so apathetic that they don't even see the wool pulled down over their eyes.
We learned that you won't admit to the truth - we have to discover it for ourselves.
We learned that you are the prefect demonstration of American tax dollars at REST. Or perhaps more to the point, you are not AUTHORIZED to reveal the truth.
I salute those within your occult organization that allow some tiny bit of the truth to be revealed.
You have provided so many important discoveries on Mars for every American to be proud of. (Sure thing)
Now where is that refilled enema bottle?
Ted Twietmeyer
[1] http://www.bookonmars.info
[2] http://www.data4science.net/index.php? project=book&view=radioimages
http://www.rense.com/general77/nasa.htm
[email protected]
7-16-7
NASA leadership needs an enema to help them in their desperate search for water on Mars.
Sounds gross? With all their pissing and moaning about "searching for signs of water" SOMEONE, somewhere should give NASA an enema. I can confidently speak for a great many people who are just plain SICK and TIRED of hearing this crap from them.
There is ABUNDANT evidence that mechanical artifacts of all kinds litter the planet. We'll talk more about that later and look at some of imaging proof.
This review is about "Roving Mars" by Walt Disney Productions and aired on the Science Channel on July 14th, 2007.
This documentary was preceded by another one-hour-wonder titled "Revealing Mars" where ever-thirsty NASA rambled on about "searching for water." Anything you read below shown in double quotes is a direct quotation from the documentary. I have strived to make every one of these as accurate as possible right down to some incredibly UN-scientific language. Get the idea I'm under- impressed by the documentary? Now why would you think that?
This one began with standard issue line, "Mars is desolate, dry and barren." So what about the polar ice which is so massive it can be seen from Earth 40 million miles away?
I guess ICE doesn't count. Supposedly it's frozen carbon dioxide, but since Mars reaches temperatures equivalent to the southern United States on almost any summer day this doesn't seem likely.
And away we go fast talking Steven Squyres of Cornell babbles "you must be a geologist to see if Mars once supported life. Only JPL could build a rover to do this" he claims. He claims that "this place is almost sacred" while pictures from JPL were shown.
Yes, he's right. Only JPL could build a rover with built-in crash- able software. Leave it to the script kiddies of this engineering generation, not to learn ONE SINGLE LESSON from an earlier generation. But as we shall see, they came CRAWLING to engineers of the past generation to get their butts out of a software ringer.
The documentary showed video clips of rovers being assembled in a clean (which will land on a dirty, dusty planet.) One engineer stated it is "the Origami Spacecraft" to get everything folded into a small space. "Two-thirds of the missions since the sixties have failed" Squyres proclaimed. We heard over and over how hard it is to get a mission successfully to Mars. Good move. Keep telling everyone this so when you SCREW UP and something goes wrong, you can blame the space gods
Hard to get something to Mars? BULL-CRAP! With EARLY 1970's technology two Vikings were sent to Mars. BOTH spacecraft not only landed safely, but continued working correctly and transmitting data well past their design life. Was this mentioned in this documentary? Of course not. These two vehicles didn't have fast processors, only had a few thousand bytes of memory but they spoke volumes about the not-so-red planet.
Did I forget to mention? NASA has scientific proof that Mars ISN'T RED at all. (See [1] for more info.)
"Two of the last missions were failures" Squyres bragged after moaning about other Mars mission failures. "Spirit was our first baby" he stated after taking about numerous previous failures. "We under-estimated the size and weight of the rovers" he proclaimed. "The airbags are like the airbags in your car, but way more expensive. The first time we tested the airbags, they tore open and deflated" according to Squyres.
Now that's something brag about.
His Highness continued, "Mars is a tough place to send a spacecraft. The average temperature is -60f." If this is true, then HOW did engineers 35 years ago accomplish it?
And did it quite well without the microprocessors and technology we have today? Here's a news flash Mr. Squyres those missions 35 years ago were the result of CAREFUL, COMMON SENSE engineering. He never ventures anywhere close to the Viking topic.
Unless of course - the Viking missions were faked and the Spirit and Opportunity rovers really are the first vehicles to land on Mars. This is certainly a possibility.
A number of video clips were also shown with the instrumentation, cameras and rock tools undergoing tests in a clean room. Somewhat ironic, considering that the very first act of the rover is to wander off the landing vehicle INTO THE DIRT. But of course, we don't want to bring Earth microbes to Mars. But wait Mars can't support life right? I'm confused are you? If it really is as cold as NASA claims, then microbes from people won't have a chance.
One of the funniest parts of the documentary was fast-talking Squyres standing out in a simulated Mars desert with a group of school children standing beside a test rover. What was also interesting is that the color of the desert sand and rocks were reddish brown- and matched the fake color of Mars sent back to Earth in images. He cautions the children, "Be careful - it can start moving at anytime!" They move back like they are about to be run over by a tractor trailer. Sure thing Steven a moving rover is something to really worry about. What a deadly machine that is. NASA stated on their website that each day a rover can only move about 250ft. Even a paraplegic ant could get out of a rover's way.
Out in the desert, a long umbilical cable connected the test rover to a laptop about 60ft. away sitting on a metal table (which looked exactly like those you find in the kitchen of a cafeteria) and of course, 2 men wearing the obligatory white lab coats. It's well known in the medical profession that people inherently trust anyone wearing one. This is why all doctors wear one patients expect it. Like a sign of wisdom and authority perhaps?
One man was holding the cable off the ground, and the other one pretending to play with the laptop while looking at the screen. From the shadows under the blue and brilliant sky it looked like it was about midday. Could the man at the laptop even SEE the LCD screen? Who writes this stuff? To borrow a line from a popular TV show, "I don't think so Tim." I swear Tim the tool man must have been around somewhere out in that desert.
Back at the wind-tunnel we see the big drag chute which is used to slow the rover's descent through the atmosphere being deployed and tested. Several engineers are standing inside the tunnel along with the deafening, roaring wind noise, their clothing flapping in the wind while they are staring up at the motionless chute. You can almost read what they are thinking in their faces this thing just might work after all!
Spirit was launched first and Opportunity three weeks later. Klaxons sounded in bursts of three as the launch equipment moved away from the pad. At T minus 0 launch time off into space the Spirit rover space vehicle was sent, on its long journey to the "red planet." NASA animations were also shown with lots of new and cute CGI. They didn't miss a trick. During the mission in space, two balancing booms were deployed which rotated close to the virtual camera position. These booms made a "wampwampwamp" sound like that of a helicopter blade whizzing over your head sitting on the ground. Who could have known just how noisy the vacuum of space really is? I was watching this with the home theater system on as I wrote this, and the racket I heard from the silence of space was deafening. NASA has shown us that physics must be wrong I heard the noise from space with my own ears!
"Landing a spacecraft on Mars is so complicated and there are so many things that can go wrong" Squyres re-iterated yet gain. I guess the TWO successful Viking AND the TWO Voyager spacecraft missions never happened. After all, you need crashing Java software to reach Mars, right?
Seven months later, the vehicle began the multi-phase Mars landing. Watching the tortuous landing on Mars was like following a bouncing ball on steroids. It wasn't unlike a church meeting that can't afford enough hymnals and uses an overhead projector. At first there was no signal from the spacecraft. Everyone was silent. A proverbial hush fell over the crowd. Tension was high in the control roomthe women closed their eyes. when .suddenly there was a SIGNAL from Mars! (At least we all hope it was from Mars, and not a covert Mars facility on Earth somewhere!) One of the men got down on his knees and paid homage to the invisible God of Space. Everyone was hugging each othersmiling, jumping up and down, clapping and in general acting (like children) as if this was the FIRST time anything had landed on Mars without being destroyed. What the children in the control room didn't seem to remember is that they are 35 years too late. Viking and even earlier missions beat them to the finish line. I call that forgetfulness "Nasanesia." It's an insidious NASA-only amnesia syndrome, and can strike without warning at press conferences, during documentary interviews and at critical times in control rooms.
Early in the mission an "upgrade" based on the bug-ridden Java language almost totally excommunicated both rovers. And I do mean excommunicated in the literal sense. In a press conference NASA admitted they brought several engineers out of retirement to help them re-boot and recover control. This was only admitted when a reporter asked about how they did it (he probably already knew the answer.) It wasn't something they willingly admitted to. NASA engineers were so arrogant and self-assured with their management of both rovers, that they uploaded the defective Java code to BOTH rovers. This flies in the face of all common sense. You don't need an engineering degree to know enough to try it on only ONE of them first. But what the heck the taxpayers are paying for it so who cares if it causes a disaster? They could readily blame the loss on a contractor. Remember Morton-Thiokol and the Challenger?
But that's the common mentality of many engineers today. They know everything. Why else would they send this Java software upload to BOTH vehicles before it was well tested? Who with common sense would EVER do this? These engineers couldn't even fix what they designed. Were any of the Java problems mentioned in the documentary? Of course not. "That wouldn't be Cricket" as the British might say.
One of the funnier parts was the animated depiction of the sun in a Mars landing animation. On Earth, the apparent size of the sun is just slightly larger than our moon. Since Mars is an about 35-40 million miles further from the sun than Earth, it's size on Mars would logically be slightly smaller than the moon since we are already 93 million miles away. But the animations showed our Sun as a rinky-dink pinpoint of light - even though recorded Mars temperatures of 90F have been recorded. What's wrong with this picture? Where is the consistent science? It doesn't exist when it comes to Mars. And I have the images and data to prove it.
After yet another commercial break the Spirit rover landed, the airbags deflated, the panels opened, the rover "woke up" from a 7 month semi-slumber and the solar panels deployed. And there in the cheering crowd was the great Sean O'Keefe - the infamous short- lived NASA administrator (2001-2005.) I wonder who on Capitol Hill he ticked off. Perhaps he missed too many free mason meetings and was ostracized.
Squyres continued, "We sent Spirit to Gusev crater. It's 100 miles across." Wrong Steven! Gusev is 90 miles across according to your agency. But in science, who cares about accuracy when you're the big honcho, the big cheese, the top dog - the over-grown bully- boy on the block? I once had a television producer offer to take my book "What NASA Isn't Telling You About Mars" to Lord Squyres, and I responded with "if he refuses to discuss or announce any of the objects on Mars which he MUST know are there already, would he ever listen to a non-geologist like me?"
He continues, "We sent it [the rover] there to look for signs of sediment." There they go again looking for past "signs of water." Someone pass me a full enema bottle please!! I can't stand to hear this statement anymore.
But "signs of water" isn't the find of the century on the non- red planet it's the artifacts which are totally ignored. I filled a book with more than 200 images of these objects, most located only a few feet from the rover cameras. There are column capitals, mechanical objects, building blocks and much more. To date, no one has challenged any of the evidence. Not even His Highness Squyres, who probably hasn't even heard of the book.
Yet another brilliant statement was made showing the signs of a higher education than mine: "Driving the rover are these kind of googley-eyed cameras. They take in everything" Lord Squyres went on. Yes, he REALLY DID use the phrase "googley-eyed ." That highly scientific description came from a man with a PhD.
He continued, "A rock on the surface can undergo weathering, from sun, wind and humidity." Did you catch that? HUMIDITY. He already had stated that Mars is a dry planet. He continued, "We sent the rover off to visit some distant hills, not knowing if it would ever make it. The distance was farther than it was designed to go." But this is because it is where the vehicle was pre-destined it to land. And there was absolutely NOTHING there. No rocks. Nothing. Zip. Just dust. Only some beads which probably quickly exhausted the interest of Earth based scientists. These were nick-named "Blue-berries." Someone give me the enema bottle, PLEASE.
Then another Lucas-like ILM quality graphic rendering of Opportunity landing in Eagle crater was shown. What a dumb-ass idea it was to send Opportunity there. But in the decision process I witnessed, a roomful of scientists were given 5 possible landing sites ON THE ENTIRE PLANET of Mars to vote on. That's right some unseen group ALLOWED them to land only at one of these sites. About 30 scientists voted to select the two sites for the rovers to land at. This scene should have been featured in the film "JackAss." Was the Cydonia area with known pyramids, structures and the infamous face included on this map? Absolutely not. The unseen powers who control NASA weren't about to let any rovers near this area. It was pre-determined that supporters of intelligent life and a city at Cydonia were not going to be vindicated. Period. Do we hear the sound of running water somewhere or is that just wishful thinking?
Opportunity landed in a place of no opportunity at all, except for making a discovery of what Squyres stated as "Little round beads and little round things. They are perfect spheres. These beads are made of hematite, which forms only in LIQUID WATER" (there it goes again, that damned water obsession.) He further stated that "Ripples in the rocks" were found, meaning there was water at the surface. Water was apparently everywhere but was never seen directly by a rover camera as of this writing. Pass me that enema bottle again please. Steven and his people are in desperate need of a reverse drink.
Squyres went on,"Spirit, our blue collar rover lands in an awful rocky place. It had to literally climb a mountain on Mars. It worked more than 2 months before it found anything." A BLUE COLLAR WORKER ROBOT?
The chart below based on artifacts in images in the book covering each of the first 625 days. The first artifacts almost three years ago were photographed at 50 days into the Spirit rover's mission on the surface, which NASA has completely ignored to this day. Almost all of these artifacts were just a few yards from the Spirit rover camera.)
Fig. 1 - Artifact summary chart from "What NASA Isn't Telling You About Mars" [2]
Zoom
Fig. 2 One of dozens of artifacts found on Mars (More at [1]) Is this a possible building ornament? If so what archeologist's hand wrote a catalog number on it?
Fig. 3 This amazing device was about 50ft. from the camera.
(Background carefully removed for clarity. More at [1])
Fig. 4 - A dark block clearly showing white lettering (More at [1])
Fig. 5 Mechanical part
And yet despite all this WATER is more important than finding intelligent life?
The narration continues about the future of the rovers which were designed to run just 90 days but are still doing well after more than 3 years: "The dust keeps forming and one day the rovers just won't wake up when the sun rises, because the solar panels will be covered with too much dust." Yet another lie the panels are BEING REGULARLY CLEANED all the time and NASA's own images prove this. The question is WHO is doing the cleaning? It's highly unlikely dust devils always do it in the nick of time.
Here is just one example of this - un-retouched images as proof from their computers:
Fig. 6 - Dirty solar panel at 11:56:21 Mars time [2]
Fig. 7 - Dirty Solar panel miraculously cleaned (by "dust devils"?) just 5 minutes later [2]
The TV special concluded with "This mission has given us a great opportunity to learn more about Mars, and more about ourselves." I could swear Steven's nose must have been growing longer by the minute while he did the show
Yes NASA, we HAVE learned a lot about ourselves.
We learned that the general public is so apathetic that they don't even see the wool pulled down over their eyes.
We learned that you won't admit to the truth - we have to discover it for ourselves.
We learned that you are the prefect demonstration of American tax dollars at REST. Or perhaps more to the point, you are not AUTHORIZED to reveal the truth.
I salute those within your occult organization that allow some tiny bit of the truth to be revealed.
You have provided so many important discoveries on Mars for every American to be proud of. (Sure thing)
Now where is that refilled enema bottle?
Ted Twietmeyer
[1] http://www.bookonmars.info
[2] http://www.data4science.net/index.php? project=book&view=radioimages
http://www.rense.com/general77/nasa.htm
