Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Meet The New “Legitimate” King of England?
#1
Video 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bA5A5Ie...e=emb_logo

Many researchers have known that the Windsor royal family have been imposters with German last name… and if that is so, then there is a real royal lineage…

The House of Windsor is the reigning royal house of the United Kingdom and the other … Place of origin, Windsor Castle, England … In 1917, the name of the royal house was changed from the German Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to … In 1947, Princess Elizabeth (now Queen Elizabeth II), heir presumptive to King George VI, … Maybe Prince Harry figured this out and thought WTF! I’m outta here! Prince Harry has just said

I suppose this means Canada, Australia and others have a new king (for now perhaps, but not for long)… but can’t say for how long, since the whole shitshow is shifting.

Meet The New “Legitimate” King of England?… And It’s Not William!! Real Reason “German” Queen Lizard Went Into Hiding!!

Don’t miss: Sananda On Possible New King Of England, Canada, Australia…King John III, The Antichrist, And The Christ

Don’t miss World Teacher & Friends: Is The Guy Claiming To Be The New King Of England (By Blood Lineage)…The “Christ” As Claimed? The Answer Is Obvious!!

Ancient Teachings Provide Hints On Who The Final Prophet Is, He Who Teaches The Kingdom Of Heaven Is Within!!

Extremely important don’t miss: Evacuation Of World’s Coastlines And All Oceans Has Begun Says Mother God

https://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/20...23775.html
[-] The following 1 user Likes Breaking News's post:
  • Richard
Reply

#2
This may well be legit after looking closely at his legal instruments, they are all placed under the organic Imperial England jurisdiction in a true Common Law court. This is consistent with the Corporate Quasi Coat of Arms that has been removed from the gate. I like the part about the delivery truck crashing into the gate, yet the wrought Iron works on the gate are completely in tact. LOL

These people prefer to lie, even when it's easier to tell the truth.
[-] The following 1 user Likes Pheonix's post:
  • Richard
Reply

#3
[-] The following 1 user Likes Pheonix's post:
  • Richard
Reply

#4
I'm not sure what to think of that video. He claims there were 2 Jesus's. The problem with Jesus stories is there is no mention of him outside of religious texts. It would seem like a guy doing miracles would be in all the history books in that time period. The shroud has been proved to be fake, so there's no proof of a Jesus like being. I have read the Illuminati invented the Jesus story to make it look like they are from that bloodline.
Reply

#5
(06-01-2020, 06:51 PM)Richard Wrote: I'm not sure what to think of that video. He claims there were 2 Jesus's. The problem with Jesus stories is there is no mention of him outside of religious texts. It would seem like a guy doing miracles would be in all the history books in that time period. The shroud has been proved to be fake, so there's no proof of a Jesus like being. I have read the Illuminati invented the Jesus story to make it look like they are from that bloodline.

I have grown weary of things spoken of in the Bible, ever more so once I got into Law.  One needs to read the Bible careful, paying very close attention to the manner in which names are presented in the Bible.  It is a book designed for both the masses, who do not have eyes that can truly see, and the indoctrinated who do.  For the masses, it's a form of guide to good behavior in life which is enveloped in a engineered/programmed Hierophant based paradigm, but to the indoctrinated it allows them to know what the mindset of the masses is pertaining to the state of their minds' inner sanctum, thereby knowing how to deal with the masses on a conscious and subconscious level.  

The principle written communication method used in the Bible was firstly created by (surprise-surprise) the Romans during the Caesar period, and is used to covertly tell the indoctrinated who is real and who is fictitious therein.


Capitis Deminutio (As defined in Blacks Legal Dictionary 8th Edition)   Black’s Definition: A diminuation or alteration of a person’s legal status.
 

Quote:Capitis Deminutio is the destruction of the “caput” or legal personality. Capitis Deminutio, so to speak, wipes out the former individual and puts a new one in place, and between the old and the new individual there is, legally speaking, nothing in common. A juristic personality may be thus destroyed in one of three ways. The description continues, and the three levels are thus described:-
 
1) Capitis Deminutio Maxima (The worst case or lowest rank in status)
    The diminuation of a persons’ legal status as a result of being reduced
     to slavery. Identified by the names JOHN WILLIAMS, OR WILLIAMS: JOHN
 2) Capitis Deminutio Media  (The middle rank in status)
     The diminuation of a persons’ legal status involving a loss of citizenship
     but not of freedom. Identified by the name John WILLIAMS, or WILLIAMS: John
 3) Capitis Deminutio Minima (The minimal change of rank in status)
                The diminuation of a persons’ legal status involving a change of family
                 while both citizenship and freedom were retained.
                 Identified by the names John Williams, or Williams: John

Capitis Deminutio Maxima = fictitious entity

Capitis Deminutio Media = The part of the name in initial Caps-only is a real entity and the All Caps part is fictitious, so the overall status regarding it also being a CHRIST is effectively fictitious too, it shows me a man called Jesus whose surname id Christ, but it shows he is NOT an anointed one (CHRIST), though it also has other connotations once the story within the Bible starts to unfold as you read it, including the establishment of the social status of the respective character whose name it is.

Capitis Deminutio Minima  = Any name written in this manner is a real character, not a fiction.

So if keep this in mind when reading the Bible, a totally different story unfolds to the one which does when we do NOT take this into account.[b]

The main point being that the name of the anointed one is written in two ways.  1. Jesus CHRIST  2. JESUS CHRIST.  This to me indicates that there are in fact TWO entities going by that name.

The same applies to the words LORD/Lord/lord therein, meaning it is referring to THREE different entities or class of lords, of which the one with the highest standing is the one written in NO CAPS, all lowerCaps, ie, lord, and so it goes with all names therein.

So regards to your question Rick, I see two entities of which ONLY ONE is a FICTITIOUS anointed-one (JESUS CHRIST), a total fiction created by MAN, not the Divine. The other is a real man whose surname they do not provide, only the title of office he occupies, the office of CHRIST. Therefore I would not put it past the Jesuits to have created the whole story behind the fictitious one to make it seem REAL by constructing the whole story around him and his place of abode (Algarve), setting up everything about it to seem REAL.

I hope that make sense Rick, it does in my mind. Biggrin
[-] The following 1 user Likes Pheonix's post:
  • Richard
Reply

#6
One story that made a lot of sense to me is Constantine created the Christian religion to unite the kingdom. There were several religions causing splits in the kingdom, and he wanted to unite them. Also, he wanted to make the Jews more peaceful because they were a Waring nation, just like they still are today. He combined the Pagan, Jewish, and Christian religions into one. It worked for most people but not the Jews. The Jews knew the Christian religion was BS, just like they still do today.

Jesus was a composite character of 4 people that did live at one time. Yeshua Ben Joseph, Rabbi Hallel, Apollonius of Tyana, and Krishna. Then they added in Pagan beliefs which were based on the sun and astrology. The very first "Bible" was called the Helios Biblios, which means "The Sun Book". The son of God is actually the SUN of God who the pagans worshiped. Sun worship is as old as man. The sun gives everything life.
Reply

#7
(06-02-2020, 11:46 AM)Richard Wrote: One story that made a lot of sense to me is Constantine created the Christian religion to unite the kingdom. There were several religions causing splits in the kingdom, and he wanted to unite them. Also, he wanted to make the Jews more peaceful because they were a Waring nation, just like they still are today. He combined the Pagan, Jewish, and Christian religions into one. It worked for most people but not the Jews. The Jews knew the Christian religion was BS, just like they still do today.

Jesus was a composite character of 4 people that did live at one time. Yeshua Ben Joseph, Rabbi Hallel, Apollonius of Tyana, and Krishna. Then they added in Pagan beliefs which were based on the sun and astrology. The very first "Bible" was called the Helios Biblios, which means "The Sun Book". The son of God is actually the SUN of God who the pagans worshiped. Sun worship is as old as man. The sun gives everything life.

What you say Rick has consistency.  The Sun book sounds a lot like a book of Astrology, and after I did some extensive research into it over many years, I came to the conclusion that the original and first Religion on earth, which does not exist anymore compliments of the Pagans, HAD to have been the Astrology which existed from 25,000 years ago when the Germanics moved into Egypt and started the Sun Cult.   From what I could gather, at around 1,000 BC the original Astrology was butchered into something like we had today, the biggest change being that 13 signs became 12 signs, thereby abolishing the sign called The Demon, which use to reside between Aries and Taurus, and of which BTW my birthday fell into its first CUSP.  So in reality, I am under the sign of Demon, NOT Aries.  They shared SOME of the traits of the Demon with both Aries and Taurus as we know them today, and I realized that the main attribute of the Demon which they smothered into Aries of today was the SINGLE seated house, which meant that Demon was the FIRST sign of the Zodiac back then. Having only ONE seat meant that Demon, just like Aries today, CANNOT SHARE its EGO with anyone else, for if they do, they become dispossessed of their ego, and if they could not get it back after allowing someone else into it, that the only solution for the Demon was suicide, albeit in SLOW form, like Alcoholism etc..  So the Main purpose of the Demon was to POSSES everyone around them, and if done so in a benevolent manner, then any OTHER sign going against them would be PUNISHED by the Divine.  No other signs have ever had that privilege from God/Divine, only the Demon and Aries.  Which is why you will find TODAY that a benevolent Aries can arc up against anything they deem as a form of social injustice with any other sign, including Leo, and if the other sign arcs up at the good Aries, he will only damage himself in the end because the Divine sees to it.  No such grace is extended to a Malicious Aries, much the contrary in fact.  

In all, one of the BEST short videos I have seen out there on this subject, and its consistent with what you've said, is this following one, which at the 9:34 mark confirms what you and I are saying.  A great video for explaining Christianity's machinations to the laymen as well:

https://youtu.be/88GTUXvp-50
[-] The following 1 user Likes Pheonix's post:
  • Richard
Reply

#8
If you've researched anything about the Anunnaki, you'll find this video interesting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzUe48XoNfA&list=WL&index=18&t=38s
Reply

#9
Here some info


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Image(s)
           
Reply

#10
Info


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
       
Image(s)
   
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.