NASA Baffled by Unexplained Force Acting on Space Probes

[Rod]

yes well, it is a 'Theory' none the less, and so are Einsteins theories, otherwise it would be called 'The Fact of Special Relativity' and not 'The Theory of Special Relativity'. lol ;)

[Anu-021413]

So I see the Rosetta sat,found two asteroids,and then went offline the closer it got. Hmmmmm.

[Pallas]

"How this works on a planetary/galactic/universal level, is that ALL mass expands. Objects do not 'fall' towards the earth, both 'grow' to connect at the centre of combined 'mass' (2D co-ordinates). So you have 'earth' and then the moon, and the centre of gravity for the obects, is the distance between the far end of the moon, and far end of earth. The centre point is what is inbetween."

The physics of this is very interesting, but what really fascinates me is that it sounds like a scientific justification for the astrological use of planetary midpoints.

[Anu-021413]

Pallas[/color]]"How this works on a planetary/galactic/universal level, is that ALL mass expands. Objects do not 'fall' towards the earth, both 'grow' to connect at the centre of combined 'mass' (2D co-ordinates). So you have 'earth' and then the moon, and the centre of gravity for the obects, is the distance between the far end of the moon, and far end of earth. The centre point is what is inbetween."

The physics of this is very interesting, but what really fascinates me is that it sounds like a scientific justification for the astrological use of planetary midpoints.

Huh?

[Pallas]

Anu-021413[/color]]

Pallas[/color]]"How this works on a planetary/galactic/universal level, is that ALL mass expands. Objects do not 'fall' towards the earth, both 'grow' to connect at the centre of combined 'mass' (2D co-ordinates). So you have 'earth' and then the moon, and the centre of gravity for the obects, is the distance between the far end of the moon, and far end of earth. The centre point is what is inbetween."

The physics of this is very interesting, but what really fascinates me is that it sounds like a scientific justification for the astrological use of planetary midpoints.

Huh?

In astrology, a midpoint is a spatial point of sensitivity that lies between planets and blends their respective energies.  Some schools of astrology view these points as being similar in significance to planets. OK, maybe it's dumb to try to relate the gravitational theory of expansions Rodrigo wrote about to astrology, but I was struck by the connection. 

[Anu-021413]

Ok,I think I understand you now.