Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
People Would Rather Electrocute Themselves Than Think For 15 Minutes
#1
By Steve Watson | Infowars.com | July 7, 2014


A shocking (pun intended) new study provides salvo for those who argue that the attention span of the general population is slowly eroding away to non-existence, finding that people would rather self administer electric shocks than just sit in an empty room thinking for fifteen minutes.

The argument that electronic devices, gadgets, and the allure of tools such as Facebook and Twitter, are causing our attention to dwindle and making us become more easily distracted is a common one.

Academics at Harvard and the University of Virginia began the study, entitled Just think: The challenges of the disengaged mind, by placing subjects into an empty room for between six and fifteen minutes, telling them to do nothing other than think to themselves.

When the allotted time was up the researchers asked the people if they had enjoyed the quiet time. Around 50 percent said they had not enjoyed it, and that they had found it difficult to concentrate on anything, finding that they could not focus on a particular subject without their mind wandering.

When the experiment was repeated, but within people’s own homes, the subjects noted that they enjoyed the process even less, with a third of them admitting that they had simply given up and checked their phones or started surfing the internet.

Taking the experiment to a new level, the researchers sat the subjects in a room with nothing other than a machine for administering small electrical shocks, once again instructing them to just have a think about things for a few minutes. Those involved had been subjected to the shock experience, and most said they loathed it and would actually pay money not to experience it a second time.

The results of the test were startling. Almost two thirds of the male subjects gave themselves one or more electrical shocks out of pure boredom, seemingly unable or unwilling to spend a short amount of time exploring their own minds.

According to the data, in a fifteen minute spell, one man administered 190 shocks to himself rather than just sit quietly with nothing to do. That data was removed from the final tally of results. Almost a quarter of the women involved also gave themselves a shock. On average, each person gave themselves a shock 1.47 times during the 15 minute period.

“Being alone with their own thoughts for 15 min[utes] was apparently so aversive that it drove many participants to self-administer an electric shock that they had earlier said they would pay to avoid,” the authors noted.

The research, made up of more than 11 separate studies involving over 100 people from all walks of life, found that age, education, income or the amount people use smartphones or social media had little bearing on the fact that most people now do not like thinking to themselves.

“The mind is designed to engage with the world,” said the lead researcher Tony Wilson. “Even when we are by ourselves, our focus usually is on the outside world. And without training in meditation or thought-control techniques, which still are difficult, most people would prefer to engage in external activities.”

According to the authors, the subjects “enjoyed doing mundane external activities much more” than thinking, leading to the conclusion that “most people seem to prefer to be doing something rather than nothing, even if that something is negative.”

The authors also noted that analytical and critical thinking defines us as humans and is an essential skill when deliberating the future or recalling the past, and that it underlies all of art and literature. The notion that a startlingly high number of individuals seemingly now cannot or will not engage in the practice will be disturbing to many.

“Research has shown that minds are difficult to control, however, and it may be particularly hard to steer our thoughts in pleasant directions and keep them there.” the study suggests. “This may be why many people seek to gain better control of their thoughts with meditation and other techniques, with clear benefits. Without such training, people prefer doing to thinking, even if what they are doing is so unpleasant that they would normally pay to avoid it. The untutored mind does not like to be alone with itself.”

Some have noted that the study recalls a quote from the French scientist and philosopher Blaise Pascal: “All human evil comes from a single cause, man’s inability to sit still in a room.”

http://www.infowars.com/study-people-wou...um=twitter
Reply

#2
Interesting article. Most people's minds could take them down in a heartbeat if they don't keep them busy with distractions.

It's probably the archons, bombardments, fluoridated water, poisoned air and food, fomented wars and constant catastrophes.  To function in this hell, our minds have to keep blocking the nightmare out but it's hard because the structure and truth of this place keeps smacking us in the face.

I'm always amazed at how well the majority are able to exist in a bubble of denial and distraction.  Humans with our numerous DNA "computer" upgrades, were engineered to be this way and to enjoy religious worship. That seems to be changing into worshipping at sporting events, rock concerts and linking in with the trends through iphone devices.
Reply

#3
I thought the article was interesting. Awhile back ago I read a news story saying commercials on TV had to cut their commercials down from 30 seconds to 15 seconds because people can't pay attention for 30 seconds anymore. That's shocking and sad. It's no wonder most people don't read anymore.
Reply

#4
The degradation of the human species is sad to watch. There's less oxygen in the atmosphere and lots of mercury, barium and aluminum, neurotoxins in the chemtrails, HYPER levels of STRESS, on and on. This "slave species of god" is on its way out.

Soon the vampires won't have an energetic food source anymore...the logical conclusion to unrestrained consumption.

The original ...the one and only "SOURCE" let it all happen.
Reply

#5
That's the other sad thing that the source let it all happen. I believe in free will but if the source is seeing everything go bad it's time to step in and do something.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 Melroy van den Berg.