Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rothschilds filed COVID-19 test patents in 2015
#1
Quote:https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/...0279585-a1
System and Method for Testing for COVID-19
Patent US-2020279585-A1

Inventor
ROTHSCHILD RICHARD A (GB)

Assignee
ROTHSCHILD RICHARD A (GB)

Date
Priority
2015/10/13

A method is provided for acquiring and transmitting biometric data (e.g., vital signs) of a user, where the data is analyzed to determine whether the user is suffering from a viral infection, such as COVID-19. The method includes using a pulse oximeter to acquire at least pulse and blood oxygen saturation percentage, which is transmitted wirelessly to a smartphone. To ensure that the data is accurate, an accelerometer within the smartphone is used to measure movement of the smartphone and/or the user. Once accurate data is acquired, it is uploaded to the cloud (or host), where the data is used (alone or together with other vital signs) to determine whether the user is suffering from (or likely to suffer from) a viral infection, such as COVID-19. Depending on the specific requirements, the data, changes thereto, and/or the determination can be used to alert medical staff and take corresponding actions.

Quote:What Is a Patent Priority Date and Is It Different From the Filing Date?

The priority date of a patent relates to the earliest filing date from within a family of patent applications. When the matter involves just one patent application, the priority date would be the filing date of the single application.

If there are more than one related patent applications involved, the patent’s priority date would then be the filing date of the first patent filing that initially revealed the invention.

The priority date may also apply to the earliest filing date of a specific characteristic of an invention. Consequently, it is reasonable to have various priority dates if additional features were included in any additional applications.

Jim Stone
Quote:BUSTED. The Rothschild family REALLY DID SEEK COVID TEST PATENTS IN 2015, SINGLED OUT SPECIFICALLY AS BEING FOR COVID IN 2015
Though the patent was indeed appropriately granted in September of 2020, the priority date and IDENTICAL ABSTRACT from 2015 BUSTS THIS COLD. THE IDENTICAL ABSTRACTS AND TITLES ARE WHAT NAILS THIS COLD AS A CUCUMBER. THERE IS NO WAY OUT OF THIS, COVID HAS BEEN PLOTTED AS COVID SINCE 2015 AND THEY CANNOT WORM THEIR WAY OUT OF IT. If this is old news that has been "debunked" it is new to me, and I have presented this in a way that cannot be debunked. The "debunkers" quote patents and "whatever" they can fake it with. However, The debunkers CANNOT POSSIBLY handle having the same abstract posted five years apart and that is what I am nailing this down with. It cannot be debunked. The abstract proves Covid is a Rothschild plot, NO IFS OR BUTS. It does not matter if methods changed 50 times to make the abstract happen. Though the patent dates are important, they can be lied about. They can be misrepresented. The abstract cannot be lied about or misrepresented, it simply is what it is, and is what cinches this. It an affirmative bust of Rothschild involvement in Covid years before it was announced, and they even called it Covid back then. They knew where they were going with this. I have simplified this down as much as possible. I will not be issuing a retraction. IMPORTANT: The U.S. patent office also has the original work on this referenced to 2015. They knew the final patent was coming the whole time and are therefore complicit. To those who think I can be manipulated by my effort to be correct, don't send me to shitty debunk sites that are known liars. The following is legit, both the U.S. government web site AND the Jewish owned one I quoted have this dated to 2015. No error was made.

The next mail I got on this topic did not say I was wrong, it said this was all confirmed six months ago, so calm down and shut up. THAT MEANS: I probably was being handled, they knew I was not wrong and tried to get me to go back on this and I do not know if the last message came from "them" but I could not care less if this news is "six months old", obviously it got censored and THEY WANT IT CENSORED. They played my desire to be accurate with everything first, told me I was wrong, told me debunk sites said I was wrong, told me their experts said I am wrong, and Suddenly I am not wrong, "calm down and shut up." I know how I'll calm down, this is getting another prominent link like the haarp report and I'll take the screaming caps out. How about that?? I AM GOING TO ASSUME I AM BEING PLAYED BY A-HOLES WHO KNOW I AM VERY CONCERNED ABOUT ACCURACY AND ARE TRYING TO SUCKER ME OUT OF POSTING THIS.

Apparently I did not make it clear enough despite posting clearly what a priority date is. THE PRIORITY DATE IS THE FIRST DATE PRESENTED WHICH DESCRIBES WHAT A PATENT IS FOR, AND ANY SUBSEQUENT PATENTS HAVE TO BE TO CINCH IN WHAT THE ORIGINAL PATENT IS FOR. THE ORIGINAL PATENT HAS AN ABSTRACT. IF THE ABSTRACT PRESENTED IN 2015 MATCHES THE ABSTRACT PRESENTED IN 2020, IT IS THE SAME ABSTRACT AND APPLIES TO THE ORIGINAL PATENT PRIORITY DATE.

THIS ABSTRACT APPLIES TO THAT WHICH WAS DATED 2015. AND THE POINT IS MOOT ANYWAY. WHAT IN THE LIVING **** WAS THE ROTHSCHILD FAMILY DOING ASKING FOR THIS IN 2015 ONLY TO HAVE IT APPLIED TO COVID NOW?? FORGET THE 2015 DATE. I REPEAT: WHAT IN THE **** IS ROTHSCHILD'S NAME DOING ON THIS. FORGET THE 2015 DATE. IS ANYONE REALLY STUPID ENOUGH TO THINK THIS WAS NOT A PLAN??? HERE IS THE ABSTRACT. WHAT T.H. is Rothschild's name DOING ON THIS? Does anyone wanna tell me all about how I am wrong about patent dates? THEN EXPLAIN THIS ABSTRACT. JUST TRY. YOU CANNOT. Oh, I am illiterate because I said "WANNA". Is that going to be the next straw man???

Here is the link to the document captured below.
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/...0279585-a1

Here is the link that explains what a priority date is. I am not going to bother linking the patent office with the 2020 patent because I guess that was confusing. This, BELOW, shows the screw up and that the Rothschilds had this in mind since 2015. IT IS NOT ARGUABLE. IT IS GAME OVER, DONE, NO WAY OUT.
https://www.inquartik.com/blog/basic-pat...rity-date/

YOU READ THIS FAR. GOOD. Now anyone who argues with this is simply going to be called a liar. I do understand that someone has their undies in a bundle over my pointing this out. I understand, and if I twist my mind into a pretzel, can sympathize. Because THIS, ABOVE. RIGHT HERE. ON THE PAGE ABOVE. LOOK UP THERE AGAIN - BUSTS THE SO CALLED ELITE OF THIS WORLD, (trash by another name) - BUSTS THEM COLD and can kill their damn covid agenda in one fell swoop. WHAT IN THE LIVING **** WAS ANYTHING ROTHSCHILD DOING WORKING ON THIS IN 2015? THE PRIORITY DATE SAYS THEY WERE, how much did they pay to have a bunch of "experts" sh*t on my inbox in the hopes of having my good conscience and adherance to the truth cause me to destroy this report with my own hands??? THE ABOVE IS BANG ON. They cannot explain away 2015!!! END OF DISCUSSION.

[Image: NXnduBH.png]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  COVID 2.0 another IQ test - ten obvious lessons Hissil 0 213 09-09-2023, 04:55 PM
Last Post: Hissil

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.