Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
Sleaze charge: 'I took drugs, had homo sex with Obama'
Minnesota man takes his case to court, YouTube, $100,000 polygraph challenge
Posted: February 17, 2008
4:45 pm Eastern
2008 WorldNetDaily
Larry Sinclair accuses Barack Obama of homosexual acts and drug use in video posted on YouTube.
WASHINGTON ââ¬â The electrifying presidential campaign of Barack Obama faces a new challenge ââ¬â a Minnesota man who claims he took cocaine in 1999 with the then-Illinois legislator and participated in homosexual acts with him.
When his story was ignored by the news media, Larry Sinclair made his case last month in a YouTube video, which has now been viewed more than a quarter-million times. And when it was still ignored by the media, Sinclair filed a suit in Minnesota District Court, alleging threats and intimidation by Obama's staff.
Sinclair, who says he is willing to submit to a polygraph test to validate his claims, will now get his chance ââ¬â thanks to a website offering $10,000 for the right to record it and $100,000 to Sinclair if he passes.
"My motivation for making this public is my desire for a presidential candidate to be honest," Sinclair told WND by telephone. "I didn't want the sex thing to come out. But I think it is important for the candidate to be honest about his drug use as late as 1999."
Sinclair, who lives in Duluth and describes himself as "gay," claims he "personally engaged in sexual activity and personally used illegal drugs in November 1999" with the man who is now the leading Democratic presidential candidate. He claims the activity took place in the back of Sinclair's limousine and occurred again, later, in his hotel. Sinclair also says he personally no longer uses drugs.
In his lawsuit, filed last week, he charges his civil rights have been violated by Obama and the Democratic Party. Named as defendants in the case are the presidential candidate, David Axelrod of AKP Message and Media in Chicago and the Democratic National Committee.
Sinclair charges Obama smoked crack cocaine in the limo while Sinclair snorted powdered cocaine provided by the legislator. He says the two met in an upscale Chicago lounge before leaving in Sinclair's limousine where the drug use and sex took place for the first time.
Sinclair says he is a registered Democrat but has never voted for any candidate. He is 46 and claims to be physically disabled.
He says he was not physically impaired in 1999 when the alleged incidents with Obama took place.
Calls placed to the Obama campaign were not returned.
See Larry Sinclair's allegations:
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Source
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56626
Listen - Free MP3 Download - Click Here
Larry Sinclair Tells It All To Jeff Rense
Posts: 726
Threads: 52
Joined: Jul 2006
Reputation:
0
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
BREAKING NEWS - Larry Sinclair Passes Drug Test
2/23/2008 3:00 PM
Larry Sinclair's drug test came back earlier than expected. He was tested for any and all chemical substances including illegal drugs that could cause an inaccurate polygraph test result. There were no traces of any such substances found.
We are awaiting for the second polygraph expert to verify the original results and should have an answer by Monday. Video of the polygraph exam will be posted shortly.
BREAKING NEWS - Larry Sinclair Completed 4 Hour Polygraph Test Today
2/22/2008 8:45 PM
Due to security concerns, we had to move the Larry Sinclair Polygraph up a few days. We conducted it in secret today and the picture to the left is from one of the two arduous polygraphs Sinclair underwent today.
The process took four grueling hours, testing Sinclair's claims of sex and drug use separately and also including a drug screening to ensure that Sinclair didn't enlist any chemical assistance.
The results are being confirmed by a second expert and we'll have conclusive word, along with video of the whole thing, Monday or Tuesday. Check back then for more, including video the tests and, of course, the results.
Larry Sinclair agrees to reduced payout with $10,000 going to Charity
2/22/2008 11:15 AM
Larry Sinclair wants to change the payout of our polygraph challenge and we've agreed. When he passes the test, he wants only enough money to pay off some outstanding debt of his mother's for Whitehouse.com to get theexclusive rights to the video and the results of the Polygraph.
He also wants $10,000 paid out to a couple of Minnesota charities: the Duluth Salvation Army Housing Loan Program and the Girls and Boys Club of Duluth. That seems perfectly reasonable to us the most penny-pinching of free spenders, and so we've agreed.
http://www.whitehouse.com/
Story Of Sinclair Allegations Spread On Net
2-23-8
Leading Gay Site Covers Sinclair Story
http://www.gaywired.com/article.cfm?ArticlePage=2&Section=67&id=18245
Allegations YouTube Suppressing Sinclair Video Popularity
http://deathby1000papercuts.blogspot.com...s-msm.html
WND Poll - Majority Suspicious Of Demagogue Obama
http://poll.worldnetdaily.com/polls/inde..._RESULTS=Y
Sinclair Allegations In Columbia Journalism Review
adikiller
Tue 19 Feb 2008 12:23 AM
When some obscure doctor came up with unsubstantiated accusations that Sen. George Allen made racist remarks thirty years ago... The MSM and CJR were tripping over themselves to tank his reelection to the Senate... (Not to mention Paul McLeary's "blockbuster" story of the outing of Allen's "jewishness")
And this was merely a Senatorial election.
But a specific individual (Larry Sinclair) has publicly accused Obama for the last month (in a YouTube video that has been watched hundreds of thousands of times) of exchanging gay sex for crack concaine in two specific places (a limo and in a specific hotel) on two specific occasions in 1999... And not a peep about it in MSM or here on CJR... We don't see a horde of fledgling "professional journalists" beating the streets on this story...
Now, you let the MSM get caught with its hand in the cookie jar (a la Rathergate) and CJR has one of its "watchdogs" on the first plane to Texas in a quixotic search of mythogical typewriters to vindicate the offending cookie snatchers...
But specific allegations against a rising Dem?... Hands off!..
Go figure...
It almost seems like some sort of a bias thing might me going on...
You think?
http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/obama_s...tive_1.php
SmokingGun.com Rails Against Sinclair
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/yea...bama1.html
Sinclair Story In London Times Blog
From Times Online
2-20-8
Clinton Could Turn Toxic As Options Dry Up
The Wisconsin defeat for Hillary Clinton means that she has to win big on March 4 - and may campaign more negatively
Okay everyone! Let's hear it! Unleash you tirade about Obama. We've heard them all before.
There are just problems with them:
One: These have been the same rants since Iowa, and despite an increasingly bright light being shown on Rezko, Larry Sinclair, and Wordsgate, the candidate KEEPS WINNING STATES BY IMPRESSIVE MARGINS.
Two: That Obama has now tapped into some of that voting block he will need to win an election.
Three: What is it in his vetting that detrators hope the press will find?And if there were a real dragon in Obama's past, shouldn't the Clinton campaign have found it by now?
Last: Isn't it just a little arrogant to assume that Obama supporters are this stupid little heard of sheep, and that opposing his candidacy (which ideologically isn't far different from any other Democrats) makes you somehow better than the majority of voters.
Maybe he's winning simply because he's a better candidate the Clinton.
Food for thought, eh?
Thomas , Dallas, TX,
http://www.rense.com/general80/d3ap.htm
Posts: 2
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
0
Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
Larry Sinclair-Obama: Obama Supporters Circulating Fake Washington Post Story?
We got an email this morning that claimed to contain the text from a Washington Post story on Thursday, February 21 2008 about Larry Sinclair, the gay man who's polygraph test about his claims of sharing sex and cocaine with Barack Obama in 1999 will be released this week.
Sinclair has alleged that he shared gay sex and cocaine/crack with Obama in the back of a limo and at a motor lodge in Gurnee, IL in 1999 while the presidential candidate was a Illinois representative.
The story-editorial, according to the email, was dated February 21, 2008 and was to have been on WashPo page 1a2.
Here's what the email said the story contained.
In late fall of 2007 Lawrence Sinclair approached campaign officials of the Sen.Barack Obama campaign, and told them a very disturbing story. Rob Allen of the Sen. Obama campaign stated. After the meeting had concluded the campaign officials ruled it off, as "just someone trying to make a buck."
The following week they received a phone call, from a man claiming to represent Mr. Sinclair, and demanding $100,000.00 as restitution for his client.
Lawrence Sinclair has filed a federal suit against Barack Obama and others for harassment since the gay man released his video on YouTube.com, a internet web-site for viewing homemade videos, alleging that, the Senator from Illinois and Mr.Sinclair shared oral sex and cocaine in the back of a Mr. Sinclair's limo in Gurnee, IL in 1999.
The Post has learned that presiding Judge Donald Wilson is dismissing the case, due to credibility on Mr.Sinclair. Stating that the complainant has an extensive record of mischievous conduct. Further more such allegations warrant sound credible standards, which are not found in matters included in this suit.
Lawrence Sinclair was convicted of "fraud" two times and investigated eight times over 25 years, for trying to secure money for "black male" charges. Two of the defendants were political figures in Illinois and Indiana. Mr.Sinclair also has an extensive record of drug convictions. The Washington Post has learned."
Now, the email said that this was an editorial from the Washington Post.
We found that hard to believe for a number of reasons.
1- Why would the Washington Post write an editorial about a story that the Post has steadfastly refused to utter a word about?
2- The email doesn't read like much of an editorial to us. It reads more like someone trying to write a fake news story.
3- Some of the information contained in the email matched the same information we tried running down that appeared in this week's Globe tabloid concerning Larry Sinclair's prison record. We were unable to substantiate it, as of this time.
4- Some of the email's information was completely new: that is, the charge that Sinclair was involved in "black male" charges. "Black male"? This alone caused us to relegate the email to the scam/spam collection.
5- The information that we do know is true: i.e., the charges Sinclair has alleged, comes almost word-for-word from one of our Larry Sinclair stories here at DBKP.
Now, we'd be flattered if some editorial writer lifted a few sentences from our story, but we doubt very much that most editorial staff at the Washington Post (Kevin Sullivan--who's left a comment at DBKP a few months back--being the exception.)
So, we checked the email out.
We ran searches on the Washington Posts website: no editorial concerning Larry Sinclair.
We went through every editorial published by the Washington Post in the last 2 weeks.
Nope, no such animal.
Who is circulating the email with the fake Washington Post editorial?
Is it the Obama campaign? Or, perhaps just an over-zealous Obama supporter?
We can't imagine a Clinton or McCain supporter circulating the email. The email made its way to the editor at BNN also, where DBKP Obama-Sinclair stories have been posted.
In any case, Larry Sinclair has made his allegations publicly, and has been threatened for his troubles by Obama supporters and the campaign itself--according to Sinclair.
This letter--unless the editorial has been pulled, and that raises a whole other set of questions--is more evidence that tends to support Sinclair's allegations of intimidation by Obama supporters.
The plot thickens.
[NOTE: The email presented no links or other proof that this editorial exists and we can find no proof it exists, either. If anyone has a link to this supposed Washington Post editorial, send it along and we'll post it. But we don't expect to receive a link for a non-existant editorial using the term "black male" charges.]
http://www.israelforum.com/blog_article.php?aid=1290676
Larry Sinclair claims he passed the polygraph test
Accoring to a comment he made on his Youtube page Mr. Sinclair has passed the polygraph test. He was attacked by some people who left disrespectful comments and Mr. Sinclair lashed out and told some of the details of the polygraph test.
http://mrsircy.blogspot.com/2008/02/sinc...graph.html
Reverse Speech Stands by Its Sinclair Results
Whitehouse.com has announced a very limited and somewhat cryptic statement about the first portion of the polygraph examination test results for Larry Sinclair, the man who claimed he shared drugs and had gay sex with Barack Obama. Their official statement says "deception indicated." This rather nebulous remark throws no light on the actual 'deception' they are referring to during the four hour session. One wonders why WhiteHouse.com appears to be stringing this process out?
Reverse Speech.com, however, stands firmly by its reversal analysis of Larry Sinclair which indicate he is telling a true story. Reverse Speech found no 'deception' of any kind in Mr. Sinclair's accounting. Furthermore, Reverse Speech did find clearly conflicted and incongruent reversals in its evaluation of a number of campaign statements by Mr. Obama. Both Sinclair and Obama reversals can be heard here: http://reversespeech.com/obamadrugs.htm and http://www.reversespeech.com/obama.htm
It is extremely important to note that in its 24 year history, Reverse Speech has never once been proven to have been wrong or to have erred in determining a person's genuine truth spoken by that person's subconscious mind. Some of its successes can be seen here - http://www.reversespeech.com/trackrec.htm
The polygraph, on the other hand, has a vast history of documented failures of false positive and false negative results. In fact, Wikipedia states "A 1997 survey of 421 psychologists estimated the test's average accuracy at about 61%, a little better than chance." See more here - http://rense.com/general80/poly.htm
ReverseSpeech.com also wonders why Barack Obama has not come forward to refute Sinclair's claims, and is now calling on him to do so. Reverse Speech would welcome the opportunity to analyze Mr. Obama speaking directly about the Sinclair allegations.
http://www.reversespeech.com/sinclairpoly.htm
|
