02-23-2022, 12:42 AM
https://www.nutritruth.org/single-post/1...-americans
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/2b456...8~mv2.webp
https://video.wixstatic.com/video/2b4567...4/file.mp4
Steve Kirsch offered one million dollars to anyone that can disprove his thesis that there are now over 100,000 deaths of Americans caused by the COVID vaccines in a moderated discussion with a neutral moderator.
He is still waiting for someone to debate him.
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/2b456...4~mv2.webp
MIT alumnus Steve Kirsch delivered public testimony at an FDA open hearing on why COVID vaccines should be immediately halted.
The presentation can be viewed, downloaded, and printed here. Kirsch offers one million dollars to anyone who can disprove his thesis that there are now over 100,000 deaths of Americans caused by the COVID vaccines in a moderated discussion with a neutral moderator and platform.
Executive summary:
CDC, FDA, NIH are spreading misinfo on vax vs. early treatment: Early treatment is being deliberately sabotaged;
The data is clear: all the “experts” are wrong about vax safety;
Our medical freedoms are being stripped away;
Nobody prominent will challenge my conclusions with a better analysis even with large $ incentives;
Debates → Government-driven censorship and intimidation;
CDC and FDA won’t engage or investigate fraud;
Medical recommendations are now being driven by the White House;
Vaccines don’t offer an all-cause morbidity or mortality benefit;
Geert Vanden Bossche was right: vaccinate mid-pandemic → disaster.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/who-w...illionaire
Who wants to be a millionaire?
Some people have questioned me about my million dollar offers. Yes, they are TOTALLY serious. There are no tricks. The only trick is I only bet on things where I know I can't lose the offer.
Steve Kirsch
Nov 22, 2021
I’ve been reading a number of comments from people who think that my million dollar offers aren’t serious.
The people who doubt me are all people who don’t know me very well.
There is no evidence of anyone who has ever attempted to negotiate a definitive agreement on any of my offers. The furthest it ever got is one time someone had their attorney contact my attorney and then when we called back, they hung up on us. Clearly, they were hoping to expose me and quickly learned I don’t bluff.
Here is a list of my million dollar offers. They are all done to expose corruption or to show people that nobody can dispute our calculations, even with a very large incentive.
Open million dollar offers
I will bet anyone $1M that the CDC lying to everyone about number of deaths
If you think the CDC is telling the truth, this is an easy way to double your money for a few hours of effort.
https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Bet.pdf
$1M research grant if you think Mathew Crawford made a math error that would change the result
I’m offering a $1M research grant to the first researcher to publish a paper that disproves Mathew Crawford’s analysis of the death data that shows that the vaccines have killed over 150,000 people in the US.
https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Grant.pdf
$2M if you can show the NIH made the right decision on fluvoxamine and ivermectin
I made this offer on May 24, 2021. No takers. You don’t even have to put any money up front for this. Just walk away with the money if you can show the NIH made the right decision on both drugs.
https://trialsitenews.com/if-you-can-pro...ld-win-2m/
$5M bet with Gavin Newsom for a blank piece of paper
See the article. If he takes the bet, I’ll happily write a term sheet. Who would turn down $5M for a blank piece of paper? If he was vaccine injured, he’d turn it down. If he is telling us the truth, it’s a free $5M he can keep or donate to his favorite charity. He can argue he doesn’t need it, but how about charities? When was the last time you saw Gavin give $5M to charity? The point is that even if he’s uber rich, he’d still take the offer in a heartbeat if he had nothing to hide. The fact he’s not accepting my offer shows critical thinkers that he’s a hypocrite by forcing people to take a vaccine he knows can damage people for the rest of their lives.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/gavin...is-vaccine
Expired million dollar offers
FDA/CDC committee debate (expired November 19, 2021)
I offered any voting member $1M to debate our team. You got the money just for showing up to be questioned. No debate here to win. Just show up at the debate table for 5 hours. Up to 5 people could show up so worst case each person walks away with at least $200K for 5 hours of work. Who would turn that down? Turns out everyone did after I sent to their emails. Which proves to me one thing: they don’t like answering questions at all.
I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy, corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is being misled by formerly trusted authorities.
https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/downloa...report.pdf
https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/a...he-russian
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p...dom-convoy
COVID Chronicles
Doctors Supporting the Freedom Convoy 2022 to Convene Public Scientific Forum
https://www.archyde.com/of-creutzfeldt-j...d-vaccine/
Dr. Byram W. Bridle
Dr. Bridle is an Associate Professor of Viral Immunology in the Department of Pathobiology at the University of Guelph.
I am absolutely thrilled to let you now that a public invitation has been issued to three of the top public health officials that have been driving the COVID-19 narrative in Canada. They are being asked to meet with me and two of my colleagues at Parliament Hill this Friday. We are travelling to our nation’s capital to demonstrate our willingness to engage in a respectful discussion of the science and medicine underpinning COVID-19. This is to be a live-streamed event with an open invitation having been issued to all ‘alternative’ and legacy media sources. You will find below a portion of the media release, plus copies of the invitations that were sent yesterday (Monday February 7th).
Please circulate this far and wide; especially to those who have supported censorship and/or used these individuals’ messaging to validate segregation and discrimination of fellow Canadians. The argument that we are not to be given a platform that may seem to validate our ideas no longer holds water. The world is watching. Many thousands will watch the livestream. Potentially, millions will see the video recording. Canadians are awakening to the obvious reality that something is very wrong in this country and far beyond. Scientists and physicians of integrity can no longer be silenced and limited to tiny audiences.
I don’t care what side of the narrative anyone is on; censorship and discouragement of respectful scientific discussions is wrong. This is a necessary component of the scientific process to facilitate transparent education of the public. Canadians pay their public servants to do this as part of our duties and you deserve to be able to make the most informed decisions possible to safeguard your health. Censorship is one of the key problems that has led to the erosion of freedoms that we now need to take back. Everyone needs to encourage the three invited health officials to perform their duty to the public and participate in this event. If these health officials don’t participate they will be sending a clear message to all Canadians: that they lack the confidence to ‘walk the walk’. If they do not show up, those pushing the narrative will need to ask why their champions are afraid to step into the arena to demonstrate the robustness of their rationale to keep Canadians locked down, segregated and imprisoned within what was once a free democracy.
Media Release:
OTTAWA – Doctors in support of the freedom convoy are inviting senior health officials to participate in a public scientific forum with subject matter experts in COVID-19, medicine, immunology, epidemiology, and virology, including Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. Paul Alexander, and Dr. Roger Hodkinson to an open and fair discussion, with senior Health Administrative representatives of the Federal Government, Dr. Theresa Tam and Dr. Howard Njoo and the Chair of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization, Dr. Shelley Deeks.
Given that the government claims we are in a state of emergency, we feel this discussion needs to be expedited and brought before the Canadian public.
As you are aware, there is a growing number of Canadians - led and inspired by the Freedom Convoy 2022 - who have traveled from across the nation to peacefully assemble in solidarity with the truckers. This movement is a lawful protest that is making its presence known across the country, and has garnered support not only throughout our nation, but also internationally. We are calling upon all Governments of Canada to publicly declare an end to the health emergency, and an end to all COVID-19 mandates both provincially and federally, as the evidence is clear that there is no health emergency, and the mandates cannot be supported scientifically. Twelve global nations including the UK and the Nordic nations of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden have now either dropped mandates entirely or will in the immediate future.
When: Friday, February 11th, 2022
1 pm to 3 pm eastern time
Where: Marriott Ottawa, York Room
Here are the formal invitations…
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/a...b55436.pdf
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/a...a6f418.pdf
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/a...737c22.pdf
Comments
My guess is they will not show, but I am sure you guys will use this as a fantastic opportunity to get the truth out to even more people because I suspect you are correct in the number of people who will watch it. I have been listening to you and the other ethical doctors who have been stepping forward, both in Canada and globally for a very long time now. My husband and I signed the Great Barrington Declaration days after it was drafted because we felt it was a more logical solution. I know this has been a difficult time for you and your family. I can not express how thankful we are that ethical individuals like yourself have stood your ground. Know that we are standing behind you in support.
It is fairly certain they will not show up. Most likely, too, by then news of mass arrests will overwhelm any interest in the discussion. Worth a try, of course.
Dr Bridle, if they do not show maybe consider doing a mock debate against quotes they have made and mandates they have backed. You will have an enormous viewership, getting the info out there again can only help and the three of you are very believable - humble, kind and credible. Thank you so much to you, Dr Hodkinson and Dr Alexander.
Fabulous! Are you following the international grand jury investigation by Dr Reiner Fuellmich in Germany? Fabulous scientific evidence coming out of it.
24ReplyGive gift
Hi Alix. Yes, I met with Reiner yesterday and have provided him with evidence over the past many months. I will be strongly supporting this international legal initiative.
Dr. Bridle,
This is the initiative many Canadians have been waiting for! Bravo!
I am certain that Steve Kirsch, whose similar and multiple invitations to the FDA, CDC and NIH, will be watching. His requests for debate received not even the courtesy of a declining of the offer. That despite that he offered $US2,000,000. just for the opportunity to have a moderated debate, regardless of the result. O course, he also suggested that the money could go to any chosen charity. I’m sure that the many Americans suffering life-altering injuries post-innoculation would have appreciated that, since Phizer & the government have ignored them.
I will be sending your message to everyone I know who is looking for clarity regarding our current insistence on continuing mandates.
God bless you Dr. Bridle! These corrupt puppets who have been telling Canadians to “trust the science” and have coerced and manipulated, must be held accountable and I am so happy that you and your colleagues are forcing them to show us this “science” that they’ve been basing and enforcing all of these heinous mandates on! May the Holy Spirit that’s been moving through our truth and freedom seeking doctors/virologists/immunologists/truckers/politicians, etc continue to reveal the truth in Canada and the world!!
Been following Dr. Bridle for some time now. A true lion we needed along with the truckers. Good luck. I don't expect them to show up. They don't have science to back them up. Reminds of the scene in The Simpsons when the content of Lionel Hutz's brief case contained shredded paper and an apple. That's exactly how I view public health officials.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/my-te...ty-experts
Our team of vaccine safety experts wants a debate but nobody pushing the narrative will accept
We think we analyzed the data correctly. We've asked the mainstream narrative experts to correct us if they think we got it wrong. They all refuse to engage us in a scientific discussion to resolve.
Steve Kirsch
Nov 3, 2021
Here is a partial list of a team of experts who collectively share beliefs about the safety of the COVID vaccines and/or the efficacy of early treatments. We are a bit old fashioned; we follow what the data says regardless of what the White House says.
Not all of us agree will agree on all issues. We are all experts in different areas.
The mainstream experts think we are spreading misinformation. But we have no interest in doing that. We just look at the data and come to a different conclusion. We are open to being persuaded we made a mistake. But so far, nobody pushing the mainstream narrative will engage in a scientific discussion on what the data actually shows. All we hear are crickets. Even when TrialSiteNews offered to host the debate, nobody showed up.
The quickest way to end the misinformation is to show us that we are wrong. Why doesn’t anyone want to do that?
Dr. Robert Malone, widely recognized as the inventor of the mRNA vaccine. He immediately recognized the dangers of the current vaccines when the biodistribution data was revealed after a FOIA request. He was one of the first people to go on record warning the world about vaccine enhanced infection and replication which was later confirmed.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, one of the few virologists in the world to warn the world about vaccinating with a non-sterilizing vaccine against a virus capable of mutation in the middle of a pandemic. Nobody at the NIH paid any attention. They still are ignoring him. Why we listen to people who don’t know what they are talking about and continue to ignore people who get it right remains a mystery.
Dr. Byram Bridle, a highly respected viral immunologist at University of Guelph, did the FOIA request that exposed the biodistribution data showing the vaccines do not stay at the injection site like people thought, but instead cause the production of a toxin in all parts of the body including the brain.
Dr. Peter McCullough, Professor of Medicine, is the author of over 1,000 peer reviewed publications, He serves as editor of two journals and sits on the editorial boards of multiple specialty journals.
Dr. Ryan Cole, one of the few pathologists who has been unafraid to speak out. His videos are included in this paper.
Dr. Bret Weinstein host of the DarkHorse podcast, expert in evolutionary biology and co-author with Dr. Heather Heying of the forthcoming book, “A Hunter-Gatherer’s Guide to the 21st Century.”
Dr. Chris Martenson, pathologist and host of Peak Prosperity on YouTube. Chris’s videos on YouTube are the most insightful videos about the virus and the vaccines.
Dr. Pierre Kory is our ivermectin expert, and one of our experts on early treatment.
Dr. Paul Alexander has expertise in the teaching of epidemiology (clinical epidemiology), evidence-based medicine, and research methodology. He is a former professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine; former COVID pandemic advisor to WHO-PAHO in Washington, D.C. (2020); and a former senior advisor on COVID pandemic policy at the U.S. government’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in Washington, D.C.
Dr. Ira Bernstein, a physician in Canada who has observed two deaths in 700 vaccinated patients and staff that can be easily shown to be attributable to the vaccine. That is a 1 in 350 death rate. One of those deaths was a previously healthy 24 year old who died in his sleep. Bernstein replicated Hoffe’s D-dimer test.
Dr. Jessica Rose is an expert on the VAERS system. Her video on VAERS have never been challenged. She has a published paper on VAERS with several more on the way.
Dr. Meryl Nass, is a physician and VAERS expert.
Dr. Sin Hang Lee, an expert on DNA sequencing.
Mathew Crawford, is a mathematician and statistician who writes frequently about the pandemic including two articles on a serious CDC math error that no other person had noticed (Part I and Part II)
Dr. Charles Hoffe, is a physician in Canada: he had 1 vaccine death in 900 patients and then did the study on d-dimer and discovered that the vaccine elevated D-dimer in most patients, an adverse vaccine effect. D-dimer is usually normal in nearly all patients.
Marc Girardot, is a member of PANDA. https://www.pandata.org/team/. PANDA is a politically and economically independent organization, focused on science-based explanations and tests them against international data. Marc has published extensively on the pandemic.
Dr. George Fareed, a physician in southern California who developed an extremely effective protocol for treating COVID-19 infections with a 99.76% risk reduction which is far more effective and safer than any vaccine
Tyson Gabriel is our mask expert. He produced this 1 hour instructional video. Nobody wants to challenge him to a debate on mask wearing.
Stephanie Seneff, senior research scientist at MIT. Although her field is computer science, she has an amazing breadth of knowledge in biology.
Aditi Bhargava, Professor, ObGyn and CRS, UCSF.
Vinu and Vinay Julapalli are brothers. Vinu is the gastroenterologist and Vinay is the cardiologist at Houston Methodist and are involved in lawsuits against the hospital over physician sovereignty. They are both appalled at what they are seeing happening to their profession especially with respect to how unvaccinated patients are treated (as second-class citizens). They’ve seen 2 to 3X the number of STEMIs in June-August than any time in history.
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler is an academic biomedical research scientist and policy analyst focused on the pursuit of knowledge to reduce human pain and suffering without profit motive.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, former CSO and VP, Allergy & Respiratory Research Head of Pfizer. Reportedly knows something about respiratory science and drug discovery. Has influenced and delivered a diverse A&R portfolio from exploratory research to clinical assets
Dr. Toby Rogers
Kathy Dopp
John Beaudoin
Joel Smalley, writes COVID Facts - Challenge the Narrative
Kevin McKernan, CSO at Medicinal Genomics Corporation.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., an American environmental lawyer, author, and anti-vaccine advocate. He’s been trying for 20 years to find someone to debate him on vaccine safety. No one will (except Alan Dershowitz but it ended badly for Alan).
Dr. Zana A. Carver, an Associate Professor of Biology with research expertise in toxicology and pharmacokinetics.
We will debate any qualified experts with comparable credentials in an open public fair debate to defend any of our viewpoints on vaccine safety, whether vaccines are a good idea, the efficacy of early treatments, whether ivermectin really works, why fluvoxamine should be used, whether masks work, etc.
The only problem is that NOBODY will debate us. They will claim privately that everything we say is false, yet they REFUSE to debate us in an open public debate.
We’ve asked the CDC, FDA, NIH, mainstream media talking heads, members of Congress, members of the medical community, etc. No takers.
So I increased the incentive and on November 18, 2021 sent out this email:
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...66x660.png
One of my Twitter followers wrote:
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...47x132.png
He’s exactly right.
Here’s the real reason they won’t debate us:
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...7x480.jpeg
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/rfk-j...t-a-debate
RFK Jr. has been trying to get a debate on vaccine safety for 20 years
No one in the medical community would debate him. They all turned down the opportunity. The reason is pretty simple. They know they would lose. Badly. Just like Alan Dershowitz learned.
Steve Kirsch
Dec 7, 2021
Nobody in the medical community is willing to debate RFK, Jr on vaccine safety.
On Jul 23, 2020, Alan Dershowitz agreed to a debate moderated by Patrick Bet-David, founder of Valuetainment. Dershowitz lost the debate handily.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfnJi7yLKgE
I knew this had happened, but it wasn’t until today that I saw the video.
The best part in my mind was at 1:20 into the video where Patrick says, “We’ve invited a lot of doctors to come and debate the COVID vaccines and everyone has turned it down.” Gee, and I thought it was just me ;).
That tells you all you need to know, doesn’t it? Nobody thinks they can win a debate on vaccine safety against Kennedy.
This is why, on July 16, 2021, nearly 1 year later, the White House instructed all social media companies to de-platform Kennedy.
Basically, in Biden’s America, the proper thing to do is censor people who don’t agree with your point of view
Nobody in Congress seems to see that as a problem. To this day, I haven’t heard of a single member of Congress objecting to this treatment of RFK, Jr. Have you?
They all know this is a key part of sustaining mass formation (more on that in my next article). They must keep opposing voices silenced or the whole thing falls apart. So they silence doctors by threatening to remove their license, and they silence others like Kennedy and me by de-platforming us.
Just for the record, here are some of the comments on the debate between the lawyers posted on YouTube. Remember, Kennedy is the guy that Biden says must be censored.
Mike Mike
Speaking as a practicing physician for almost 50 years, this video should be required viewing in every medical school. I have never been a big fan of Robert Kennedy Jr. but he definitely won this debate.
fazerofzanight
Robert Kennedy is a treasure of a human being. Grateful for the work he is doing for humanity.
Jon Scott
I'm 100% with Robert Kennedy
Food Has A Story
Robert Kennedy Jr. should teach ethics and morality at high schools, colleges, and businesses. He is the moral compass of The United States of America. This man should have an army guarding him twenty-four seven.
Deborah Jones
Kennedy makes so much more sense with facts and studies!
Jason Barndon
What a special person Robert Kennedy is, not only is he a very clever man, he cares about humanity as a whole, putting peoples health before profits. All the very best Robert.
Kara Lawrence
If there was one person in this world I’d want to have dinner with to thank them for sharing their gifts & guts with humanity, it would be Robert Kennedy. Hands down.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/wed-l...e-a-debate
We'd love to have a debate
So far, nobody prominent wants to debate us in a recorded, fair, moderated debate. But we put together the rules just in case. The rules are designed for a lively discussion.
Steve Kirsch
Dec 2, 2021
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...x1667.jpeg
We aren’t holding our breath here that anyone will accept our offer to debate our team of experts despite the fact that there are a lot of legitimate issues that need to be clarified (such as the fact check topics here and the debate topics here).
TrialSiteNews challenged the pro-vax advocates to debate us on September 28 and as now, 2 months later, there were no takers. Zero. Zip. Nada. Even reach out by TrialSiteNews to the drug companies was unsuccessful in getting a response. They refused to defend their own product.
Here are the rules we’ve put together to ensure a very lively debate that efficiently uses the time available. We are open to any suggestions to improve the rules.
Rules of engagement
3 hour debate proposed. Modified by mutual consent.
Debate is on Zoom. It will be recorded and all participants will get a copy.
The only people on the zoom call will be the two moderators and the team members.
Each side will appoint a moderator. The moderators are there just to enforce the rules.
Permission is given by all participants to re-use and repurpose the video for any purpose.
Control is given to each side for 6 minutes at a time. That side “has the floor” and can ask the other side questions, interrupt the person, etc. This is how it works in a Congressional hearing where the Members ask questions of the witness and can interrupt the witness at any time. The side in control can assign the “floor” to a single team member to use or control may be shared among multiple team members. The important feature is the side in control has full control and can interrupt the opposing side if they feel the questions are not being answered and the other side is running down the clock and not answering the question. There is no limit to the topics covered in the 6 minutes. We suggest one questioner and one topic for each 6 minute slot, but that is just a recommendation.
We are happy to negotiate a different time limit for each side per question.
Questions are not shown to the other side in advance so you’ll need to think on your feet.
Teams can have up to 12 people on each side inside the debate room. This provides complete coverage on all topic areas, yet keeps the number of participants manageable.
Teams must be populated with actual real people with real names and verifiable identity. All must be on video. No disguises, no altering voices, no hiding of identities. We are not here to play games.
Teams will disclose the names of the participants on their side at least 24 hours prior to the debate.
The team captains will agree on a mutually agreeable date/time for the debate which shall be set at least 1 week before the debate time.
A live Coin flip decides who starts.
Rule option #2
We are also happy with a non moderated debate where each side speaks for a maximum of 3 minutes at a time and it goes back and forth between the sides for 3 hours.
Ground rules
Breaking rules more than 3 times excludes you from the rest of debate.
No ad hominem attacks.
Team members must keep their remarks focused on answering the question from the other side. You cannot change the topic.
What’s in it for both sides
Address BOTH misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in a single debate. Both are key objectives of each side.
The debate rules are completely symmetrical. No side has any advantage.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/covid...ate-topics
COVID vaccine debate topics
If anyone accepts our debate offer, there are a few things we'd love to talk about.
There is so much to talk about. Here’s a partial list.
I offered $1M up front to the members of the FDA and CDC outside committee to just sit down with me for a Q&A session. Nobody accepted. I guess they don’t want to talk about any of these issues. And don’t worry, the press will never ask them any of these questions!
Slide decks
Vaccine essentials (source slides)
Vaccine policies (source slides)
All you need to know (source slides)
180 questions about the COVID vaccines that nobody wants to answer (slides PDF, slides source)
Vaccine safety
We have 8 different ways showing the vaccines have killed over 150,000 Americans so far. How can all 8 methods be wrong? How come nobody took my $1M offer for finding an error in Crawford’s analysis? Do I need to increase the amount? After all, everyone knows it must be wrong so it’s an easy $1M for someone. We don’t get it.
The CDC says nobody has died from the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Surely, you can’t believe that, can you? Peter Schirmacher showed without a doubt that at least 30% to 40% of the deaths within 2 weeks after vaccination were caused by the vaccine. Someone is lying. Do you have an expert more qualified than Schirmacher who claims he’s wrong?
Why were there 4X as many cardiac arrests in the treatment group than the placebo group in the clinical trial. The VAERS data shows very clearly a 450X increase in cardiac events post vaccine. Isn’t it possible that those deaths could have been caused by the vaccine? How was that possibility ruled out?
Dr Toby Rogers found we’ll kill 117 kids for each kid we save from COVID. Is this acceptable? Did he get it wrong? How? What is the correct risk-benefit analysis that we should be using that shows this number?
How come sports players are dying on the field at a rate 60 times higher than normal?
The Pfizer data presented at the CDC meeting showed the VAERS data for myocarditis is at least 5X under-reported. How come the CDC hasn’t said anything? Doesn’t the new updated myocarditis rate then cause us to stop?
Every physician we talk to says there are higher rates of everything post-vaccine than pre-vaccine. How is that possible?
Can we see evidence that the rates of myocarditis is lower with COVID than the vaccine, e.g., from actual clinical practices? We’d love to see this data.
What is the stopping condition for these vaccines? How many deaths are OK? Or does it even matter? So if we kill 10M people is that OK?
Were you OK that the stopping condition was never defined for the vaccine? Is this the new way we do medicine now?
VAERS analysis
VAERS analysis shows clearly that these vaccines kill more people than they save. Did we get it wrong?
VAERS shows causality due to time proximity and dose dependency. Why won’t anyone from the CDC acknowledge this? We can satisfy all 5 Bradford-Hill critera. So we can prove the vaccines caused these injuries including death.
If the CDC is telling the truth that there are no deaths from the vaccine, how do you explain the causality numbers in VAERS?
We calculate a URF of 41 using the CDC methodology and the VAERS numbers. What is the correct number and how did we goof?
How come there are more VAERS events reported this year than all 30 years combined? It isn’t overreporting since individual providers report exactly the same statistic, like 2000 cases this year and 0 in the last 11 years.
Why are there over 4,000 adverse events in VAERS elevated by 10X or more over baseline?
What was the cause of the deaths of the 14 kids the CDC analyzed? These were not “normal” deaths. So what “caused” them? Bleeding in the brain??? Why is this showing up this year yet no record of it in 30 years of VAERS history for that age range. Isn’t that a big suspicious?
VAERS shows this is the deadliest vaccine in human history, even with a URF of 1. So why are we allowing it?
Can we bust the CDC claim about causality? It’s time to put that one to bed, isn’t it?
How come John Su isn’t defending himself against our allegations that he didn’t calculate the VAERS URF and nobody from the CDC will come to his defense either?
Effectiveness
How about that Harvard study? It shows the line is sloping the wrong way. How do you explain that? It seems pretty incriminating?
How come the US has 150X times higher cases per capita than Uttar Pradesh which has just an 11% vaccination rate.
If the vaccines are so effective than how can a New York hospital have a 90% admission of vaccinated patients in an area with a 50% vaccination rate?
The Pfizer study shows 20 people who got the drug died vs. 14 who got the placebo. How can anyone conclude that the drug is the better option if you want to stay alive?
Isn’t vaccine efficacy a statistical illusion?
How come the PCR tests for the vaccinated and unvaccinted look the same?
FDA and CDC committees
OK, so no NNTV or risk-benefit analysis showing VAERS deaths. Is this the new standard for risk-benefit analysis? Rate the risk-benefit analysis on a scale of 1 to 10 in quality.
They said the rate of myocarditis is more for COVID than the vaccine. Sure, if you fudge the VAERS data with a URF of 1, you can show that. But come on, can you show me a single clinician that has stats like that? Are these people living on our planet?
Fraud
Why is Gavin Newsom not taking the $5M for giving us a blank piece of paper. Most sane people would take that offer in a heartbeat. Is he hiding something or is there a legit reason for the bizarre behavior?
How about the case of Maddie de Garay? Isn’t that clinical trial fraud? The FDA head promised to investigate and did nothing? How come you aren’t holding them accountable? A permanent paralysis in the treatment group is something people should be aware of, isn’t it? Or is this the new norm in medicine?
How about fraud in the Pfizer study. It’s a double blind study, yet there were 5X the exemptions in the treatment group than the placebo group. That was bigger than the effect size. How come nobody said anything?
Jessica Rose’s paper on myocarditis showing it isn’t limited to kids was pulled by the publisher for no reason. Nobody complained. Is this the new norm that anything that goes against the narrative is censored? What did you do about it?
Mandates
Do you agree with the CDC (under FOIA from Aaron Siri) that recovered people cannot spread the virus. Therefore, those who are recovered should certainly be exempt
Do you agree that people who recover from COVID and get it again won’t be hospitalized or die? Got a counterexample?
Can we see the risk-benefit analysis showing mandates are a good idea? And how do you tradeoff risking my life for someone else’s life?
If the vaccine works, why do we need mandates? If the vaccine don’t work, why do we need mandates?
Do you agree with this? “COVID vaccine mandates are necessary because the protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn't protect the protected.”
Mitigation
Let’s chat about masking. Fauci said they were useless, then 1 month later, they are required. Did the laws of physics change in March 2020?
Early treatments
Why aren’t we using early treatment protocols like Fareed and Tyson with a 99.76% reduction in hospitalization and 100% reduction in death?
Why is NIH ignoring fluvoxamine? Are we about saving lives or enriching the drug companies? Why isn’t anyone in the medical community speaking out? Is science dead? Is this medical treatment dictated by the NIH?
Hypocrisy
Newsom is mandating our kids get the vaccine, but his kids are unvaccinated. If it is safe for our kids, how come it isn’t safe for his kids?
Censorship
Why is the White House censoring critics rather than debating them?
Did you speak out about the censorship of early treatment protocols?
Were the techniques used against Mercola really necessary? What is the biggest piece of misinformation he has given? Let’s chat about whether it was correct or not.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/do-yo...ver-want-a
Do you know why they NEVER want a live debate?
For some people, it's because they communicate better in writing. For other people, it can be because they aren't an expert on the topic and don't want to be exposed in public.
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...51x475.png
Christine Massey, whose background is in biostatistics (cancer research) wrote an open letter claiming my post which claimed that the experts I talked to say that virus has been isolated are wrong and that the virus hasn’t been “isolated.”
Here’s my original post:
Has the virus been isolated? Yes.
At-a-Glance The virus against which COVID vaccines have been developed has been isolated and experiments could be done on animals in specialized labs that can safely handle certain viruses, rather than conducting an experiment on us. Such experiments could include biodistribution studies and could elucidate what happens to animals that are vaccinated an…
Read more
a month ago · 586 likes · 1,401 comments · Steve Kirsch
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/2b456...8~mv2.webp
https://video.wixstatic.com/video/2b4567...4/file.mp4
Steve Kirsch offered one million dollars to anyone that can disprove his thesis that there are now over 100,000 deaths of Americans caused by the COVID vaccines in a moderated discussion with a neutral moderator.
He is still waiting for someone to debate him.
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/2b456...4~mv2.webp
MIT alumnus Steve Kirsch delivered public testimony at an FDA open hearing on why COVID vaccines should be immediately halted.
The presentation can be viewed, downloaded, and printed here. Kirsch offers one million dollars to anyone who can disprove his thesis that there are now over 100,000 deaths of Americans caused by the COVID vaccines in a moderated discussion with a neutral moderator and platform.
Executive summary:
CDC, FDA, NIH are spreading misinfo on vax vs. early treatment: Early treatment is being deliberately sabotaged;
The data is clear: all the “experts” are wrong about vax safety;
Our medical freedoms are being stripped away;
Nobody prominent will challenge my conclusions with a better analysis even with large $ incentives;
Debates → Government-driven censorship and intimidation;
CDC and FDA won’t engage or investigate fraud;
Medical recommendations are now being driven by the White House;
Vaccines don’t offer an all-cause morbidity or mortality benefit;
Geert Vanden Bossche was right: vaccinate mid-pandemic → disaster.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/who-w...illionaire
Who wants to be a millionaire?
Some people have questioned me about my million dollar offers. Yes, they are TOTALLY serious. There are no tricks. The only trick is I only bet on things where I know I can't lose the offer.
Steve Kirsch
Nov 22, 2021
I’ve been reading a number of comments from people who think that my million dollar offers aren’t serious.
The people who doubt me are all people who don’t know me very well.
There is no evidence of anyone who has ever attempted to negotiate a definitive agreement on any of my offers. The furthest it ever got is one time someone had their attorney contact my attorney and then when we called back, they hung up on us. Clearly, they were hoping to expose me and quickly learned I don’t bluff.
Here is a list of my million dollar offers. They are all done to expose corruption or to show people that nobody can dispute our calculations, even with a very large incentive.
Open million dollar offers
I will bet anyone $1M that the CDC lying to everyone about number of deaths
If you think the CDC is telling the truth, this is an easy way to double your money for a few hours of effort.
https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Bet.pdf
$1M research grant if you think Mathew Crawford made a math error that would change the result
I’m offering a $1M research grant to the first researcher to publish a paper that disproves Mathew Crawford’s analysis of the death data that shows that the vaccines have killed over 150,000 people in the US.
https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Grant.pdf
$2M if you can show the NIH made the right decision on fluvoxamine and ivermectin
I made this offer on May 24, 2021. No takers. You don’t even have to put any money up front for this. Just walk away with the money if you can show the NIH made the right decision on both drugs.
https://trialsitenews.com/if-you-can-pro...ld-win-2m/
$5M bet with Gavin Newsom for a blank piece of paper
See the article. If he takes the bet, I’ll happily write a term sheet. Who would turn down $5M for a blank piece of paper? If he was vaccine injured, he’d turn it down. If he is telling us the truth, it’s a free $5M he can keep or donate to his favorite charity. He can argue he doesn’t need it, but how about charities? When was the last time you saw Gavin give $5M to charity? The point is that even if he’s uber rich, he’d still take the offer in a heartbeat if he had nothing to hide. The fact he’s not accepting my offer shows critical thinkers that he’s a hypocrite by forcing people to take a vaccine he knows can damage people for the rest of their lives.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/gavin...is-vaccine
Expired million dollar offers
FDA/CDC committee debate (expired November 19, 2021)
I offered any voting member $1M to debate our team. You got the money just for showing up to be questioned. No debate here to win. Just show up at the debate table for 5 hours. Up to 5 people could show up so worst case each person walks away with at least $200K for 5 hours of work. Who would turn that down? Turns out everyone did after I sent to their emails. Which proves to me one thing: they don’t like answering questions at all.
I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy, corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is being misled by formerly trusted authorities.
https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/downloa...report.pdf
https://edwardslavsquat.substack.com/p/a...he-russian
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p...dom-convoy
COVID Chronicles
Doctors Supporting the Freedom Convoy 2022 to Convene Public Scientific Forum
https://www.archyde.com/of-creutzfeldt-j...d-vaccine/
Dr. Byram W. Bridle
Dr. Bridle is an Associate Professor of Viral Immunology in the Department of Pathobiology at the University of Guelph.
I am absolutely thrilled to let you now that a public invitation has been issued to three of the top public health officials that have been driving the COVID-19 narrative in Canada. They are being asked to meet with me and two of my colleagues at Parliament Hill this Friday. We are travelling to our nation’s capital to demonstrate our willingness to engage in a respectful discussion of the science and medicine underpinning COVID-19. This is to be a live-streamed event with an open invitation having been issued to all ‘alternative’ and legacy media sources. You will find below a portion of the media release, plus copies of the invitations that were sent yesterday (Monday February 7th).
Please circulate this far and wide; especially to those who have supported censorship and/or used these individuals’ messaging to validate segregation and discrimination of fellow Canadians. The argument that we are not to be given a platform that may seem to validate our ideas no longer holds water. The world is watching. Many thousands will watch the livestream. Potentially, millions will see the video recording. Canadians are awakening to the obvious reality that something is very wrong in this country and far beyond. Scientists and physicians of integrity can no longer be silenced and limited to tiny audiences.
I don’t care what side of the narrative anyone is on; censorship and discouragement of respectful scientific discussions is wrong. This is a necessary component of the scientific process to facilitate transparent education of the public. Canadians pay their public servants to do this as part of our duties and you deserve to be able to make the most informed decisions possible to safeguard your health. Censorship is one of the key problems that has led to the erosion of freedoms that we now need to take back. Everyone needs to encourage the three invited health officials to perform their duty to the public and participate in this event. If these health officials don’t participate they will be sending a clear message to all Canadians: that they lack the confidence to ‘walk the walk’. If they do not show up, those pushing the narrative will need to ask why their champions are afraid to step into the arena to demonstrate the robustness of their rationale to keep Canadians locked down, segregated and imprisoned within what was once a free democracy.
Media Release:
OTTAWA – Doctors in support of the freedom convoy are inviting senior health officials to participate in a public scientific forum with subject matter experts in COVID-19, medicine, immunology, epidemiology, and virology, including Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. Paul Alexander, and Dr. Roger Hodkinson to an open and fair discussion, with senior Health Administrative representatives of the Federal Government, Dr. Theresa Tam and Dr. Howard Njoo and the Chair of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization, Dr. Shelley Deeks.
Given that the government claims we are in a state of emergency, we feel this discussion needs to be expedited and brought before the Canadian public.
As you are aware, there is a growing number of Canadians - led and inspired by the Freedom Convoy 2022 - who have traveled from across the nation to peacefully assemble in solidarity with the truckers. This movement is a lawful protest that is making its presence known across the country, and has garnered support not only throughout our nation, but also internationally. We are calling upon all Governments of Canada to publicly declare an end to the health emergency, and an end to all COVID-19 mandates both provincially and federally, as the evidence is clear that there is no health emergency, and the mandates cannot be supported scientifically. Twelve global nations including the UK and the Nordic nations of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden have now either dropped mandates entirely or will in the immediate future.
When: Friday, February 11th, 2022
1 pm to 3 pm eastern time
Where: Marriott Ottawa, York Room
Here are the formal invitations…
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/a...b55436.pdf
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/a...a6f418.pdf
https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/a...737c22.pdf
Comments
My guess is they will not show, but I am sure you guys will use this as a fantastic opportunity to get the truth out to even more people because I suspect you are correct in the number of people who will watch it. I have been listening to you and the other ethical doctors who have been stepping forward, both in Canada and globally for a very long time now. My husband and I signed the Great Barrington Declaration days after it was drafted because we felt it was a more logical solution. I know this has been a difficult time for you and your family. I can not express how thankful we are that ethical individuals like yourself have stood your ground. Know that we are standing behind you in support.
It is fairly certain they will not show up. Most likely, too, by then news of mass arrests will overwhelm any interest in the discussion. Worth a try, of course.
Dr Bridle, if they do not show maybe consider doing a mock debate against quotes they have made and mandates they have backed. You will have an enormous viewership, getting the info out there again can only help and the three of you are very believable - humble, kind and credible. Thank you so much to you, Dr Hodkinson and Dr Alexander.
Fabulous! Are you following the international grand jury investigation by Dr Reiner Fuellmich in Germany? Fabulous scientific evidence coming out of it.
24ReplyGive gift
Hi Alix. Yes, I met with Reiner yesterday and have provided him with evidence over the past many months. I will be strongly supporting this international legal initiative.
Dr. Bridle,
This is the initiative many Canadians have been waiting for! Bravo!
I am certain that Steve Kirsch, whose similar and multiple invitations to the FDA, CDC and NIH, will be watching. His requests for debate received not even the courtesy of a declining of the offer. That despite that he offered $US2,000,000. just for the opportunity to have a moderated debate, regardless of the result. O course, he also suggested that the money could go to any chosen charity. I’m sure that the many Americans suffering life-altering injuries post-innoculation would have appreciated that, since Phizer & the government have ignored them.
I will be sending your message to everyone I know who is looking for clarity regarding our current insistence on continuing mandates.
God bless you Dr. Bridle! These corrupt puppets who have been telling Canadians to “trust the science” and have coerced and manipulated, must be held accountable and I am so happy that you and your colleagues are forcing them to show us this “science” that they’ve been basing and enforcing all of these heinous mandates on! May the Holy Spirit that’s been moving through our truth and freedom seeking doctors/virologists/immunologists/truckers/politicians, etc continue to reveal the truth in Canada and the world!!
Been following Dr. Bridle for some time now. A true lion we needed along with the truckers. Good luck. I don't expect them to show up. They don't have science to back them up. Reminds of the scene in The Simpsons when the content of Lionel Hutz's brief case contained shredded paper and an apple. That's exactly how I view public health officials.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/my-te...ty-experts
Our team of vaccine safety experts wants a debate but nobody pushing the narrative will accept
We think we analyzed the data correctly. We've asked the mainstream narrative experts to correct us if they think we got it wrong. They all refuse to engage us in a scientific discussion to resolve.
Steve Kirsch
Nov 3, 2021
Here is a partial list of a team of experts who collectively share beliefs about the safety of the COVID vaccines and/or the efficacy of early treatments. We are a bit old fashioned; we follow what the data says regardless of what the White House says.
Not all of us agree will agree on all issues. We are all experts in different areas.
The mainstream experts think we are spreading misinformation. But we have no interest in doing that. We just look at the data and come to a different conclusion. We are open to being persuaded we made a mistake. But so far, nobody pushing the mainstream narrative will engage in a scientific discussion on what the data actually shows. All we hear are crickets. Even when TrialSiteNews offered to host the debate, nobody showed up.
The quickest way to end the misinformation is to show us that we are wrong. Why doesn’t anyone want to do that?
Dr. Robert Malone, widely recognized as the inventor of the mRNA vaccine. He immediately recognized the dangers of the current vaccines when the biodistribution data was revealed after a FOIA request. He was one of the first people to go on record warning the world about vaccine enhanced infection and replication which was later confirmed.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, one of the few virologists in the world to warn the world about vaccinating with a non-sterilizing vaccine against a virus capable of mutation in the middle of a pandemic. Nobody at the NIH paid any attention. They still are ignoring him. Why we listen to people who don’t know what they are talking about and continue to ignore people who get it right remains a mystery.
Dr. Byram Bridle, a highly respected viral immunologist at University of Guelph, did the FOIA request that exposed the biodistribution data showing the vaccines do not stay at the injection site like people thought, but instead cause the production of a toxin in all parts of the body including the brain.
Dr. Peter McCullough, Professor of Medicine, is the author of over 1,000 peer reviewed publications, He serves as editor of two journals and sits on the editorial boards of multiple specialty journals.
Dr. Ryan Cole, one of the few pathologists who has been unafraid to speak out. His videos are included in this paper.
Dr. Bret Weinstein host of the DarkHorse podcast, expert in evolutionary biology and co-author with Dr. Heather Heying of the forthcoming book, “A Hunter-Gatherer’s Guide to the 21st Century.”
Dr. Chris Martenson, pathologist and host of Peak Prosperity on YouTube. Chris’s videos on YouTube are the most insightful videos about the virus and the vaccines.
Dr. Pierre Kory is our ivermectin expert, and one of our experts on early treatment.
Dr. Paul Alexander has expertise in the teaching of epidemiology (clinical epidemiology), evidence-based medicine, and research methodology. He is a former professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine; former COVID pandemic advisor to WHO-PAHO in Washington, D.C. (2020); and a former senior advisor on COVID pandemic policy at the U.S. government’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in Washington, D.C.
Dr. Ira Bernstein, a physician in Canada who has observed two deaths in 700 vaccinated patients and staff that can be easily shown to be attributable to the vaccine. That is a 1 in 350 death rate. One of those deaths was a previously healthy 24 year old who died in his sleep. Bernstein replicated Hoffe’s D-dimer test.
Dr. Jessica Rose is an expert on the VAERS system. Her video on VAERS have never been challenged. She has a published paper on VAERS with several more on the way.
Dr. Meryl Nass, is a physician and VAERS expert.
Dr. Sin Hang Lee, an expert on DNA sequencing.
Mathew Crawford, is a mathematician and statistician who writes frequently about the pandemic including two articles on a serious CDC math error that no other person had noticed (Part I and Part II)
Dr. Charles Hoffe, is a physician in Canada: he had 1 vaccine death in 900 patients and then did the study on d-dimer and discovered that the vaccine elevated D-dimer in most patients, an adverse vaccine effect. D-dimer is usually normal in nearly all patients.
Marc Girardot, is a member of PANDA. https://www.pandata.org/team/. PANDA is a politically and economically independent organization, focused on science-based explanations and tests them against international data. Marc has published extensively on the pandemic.
Dr. George Fareed, a physician in southern California who developed an extremely effective protocol for treating COVID-19 infections with a 99.76% risk reduction which is far more effective and safer than any vaccine
Tyson Gabriel is our mask expert. He produced this 1 hour instructional video. Nobody wants to challenge him to a debate on mask wearing.
Stephanie Seneff, senior research scientist at MIT. Although her field is computer science, she has an amazing breadth of knowledge in biology.
Aditi Bhargava, Professor, ObGyn and CRS, UCSF.
Vinu and Vinay Julapalli are brothers. Vinu is the gastroenterologist and Vinay is the cardiologist at Houston Methodist and are involved in lawsuits against the hospital over physician sovereignty. They are both appalled at what they are seeing happening to their profession especially with respect to how unvaccinated patients are treated (as second-class citizens). They’ve seen 2 to 3X the number of STEMIs in June-August than any time in history.
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler is an academic biomedical research scientist and policy analyst focused on the pursuit of knowledge to reduce human pain and suffering without profit motive.
Dr. Mike Yeadon, former CSO and VP, Allergy & Respiratory Research Head of Pfizer. Reportedly knows something about respiratory science and drug discovery. Has influenced and delivered a diverse A&R portfolio from exploratory research to clinical assets
Dr. Toby Rogers
Kathy Dopp
John Beaudoin
Joel Smalley, writes COVID Facts - Challenge the Narrative
Kevin McKernan, CSO at Medicinal Genomics Corporation.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., an American environmental lawyer, author, and anti-vaccine advocate. He’s been trying for 20 years to find someone to debate him on vaccine safety. No one will (except Alan Dershowitz but it ended badly for Alan).
Dr. Zana A. Carver, an Associate Professor of Biology with research expertise in toxicology and pharmacokinetics.
We will debate any qualified experts with comparable credentials in an open public fair debate to defend any of our viewpoints on vaccine safety, whether vaccines are a good idea, the efficacy of early treatments, whether ivermectin really works, why fluvoxamine should be used, whether masks work, etc.
The only problem is that NOBODY will debate us. They will claim privately that everything we say is false, yet they REFUSE to debate us in an open public debate.
We’ve asked the CDC, FDA, NIH, mainstream media talking heads, members of Congress, members of the medical community, etc. No takers.
So I increased the incentive and on November 18, 2021 sent out this email:
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...66x660.png
One of my Twitter followers wrote:
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...47x132.png
He’s exactly right.
Here’s the real reason they won’t debate us:
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...7x480.jpeg
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/rfk-j...t-a-debate
RFK Jr. has been trying to get a debate on vaccine safety for 20 years
No one in the medical community would debate him. They all turned down the opportunity. The reason is pretty simple. They know they would lose. Badly. Just like Alan Dershowitz learned.
Steve Kirsch
Dec 7, 2021
Nobody in the medical community is willing to debate RFK, Jr on vaccine safety.
On Jul 23, 2020, Alan Dershowitz agreed to a debate moderated by Patrick Bet-David, founder of Valuetainment. Dershowitz lost the debate handily.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfnJi7yLKgE
I knew this had happened, but it wasn’t until today that I saw the video.
The best part in my mind was at 1:20 into the video where Patrick says, “We’ve invited a lot of doctors to come and debate the COVID vaccines and everyone has turned it down.” Gee, and I thought it was just me ;).
That tells you all you need to know, doesn’t it? Nobody thinks they can win a debate on vaccine safety against Kennedy.
This is why, on July 16, 2021, nearly 1 year later, the White House instructed all social media companies to de-platform Kennedy.
Basically, in Biden’s America, the proper thing to do is censor people who don’t agree with your point of view
Nobody in Congress seems to see that as a problem. To this day, I haven’t heard of a single member of Congress objecting to this treatment of RFK, Jr. Have you?
They all know this is a key part of sustaining mass formation (more on that in my next article). They must keep opposing voices silenced or the whole thing falls apart. So they silence doctors by threatening to remove their license, and they silence others like Kennedy and me by de-platforming us.
Just for the record, here are some of the comments on the debate between the lawyers posted on YouTube. Remember, Kennedy is the guy that Biden says must be censored.
Mike Mike
Speaking as a practicing physician for almost 50 years, this video should be required viewing in every medical school. I have never been a big fan of Robert Kennedy Jr. but he definitely won this debate.
fazerofzanight
Robert Kennedy is a treasure of a human being. Grateful for the work he is doing for humanity.
Jon Scott
I'm 100% with Robert Kennedy
Food Has A Story
Robert Kennedy Jr. should teach ethics and morality at high schools, colleges, and businesses. He is the moral compass of The United States of America. This man should have an army guarding him twenty-four seven.
Deborah Jones
Kennedy makes so much more sense with facts and studies!
Jason Barndon
What a special person Robert Kennedy is, not only is he a very clever man, he cares about humanity as a whole, putting peoples health before profits. All the very best Robert.
Kara Lawrence
If there was one person in this world I’d want to have dinner with to thank them for sharing their gifts & guts with humanity, it would be Robert Kennedy. Hands down.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/wed-l...e-a-debate
We'd love to have a debate
So far, nobody prominent wants to debate us in a recorded, fair, moderated debate. But we put together the rules just in case. The rules are designed for a lively discussion.
Steve Kirsch
Dec 2, 2021
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...x1667.jpeg
We aren’t holding our breath here that anyone will accept our offer to debate our team of experts despite the fact that there are a lot of legitimate issues that need to be clarified (such as the fact check topics here and the debate topics here).
TrialSiteNews challenged the pro-vax advocates to debate us on September 28 and as now, 2 months later, there were no takers. Zero. Zip. Nada. Even reach out by TrialSiteNews to the drug companies was unsuccessful in getting a response. They refused to defend their own product.
Here are the rules we’ve put together to ensure a very lively debate that efficiently uses the time available. We are open to any suggestions to improve the rules.
Rules of engagement
3 hour debate proposed. Modified by mutual consent.
Debate is on Zoom. It will be recorded and all participants will get a copy.
The only people on the zoom call will be the two moderators and the team members.
Each side will appoint a moderator. The moderators are there just to enforce the rules.
Permission is given by all participants to re-use and repurpose the video for any purpose.
Control is given to each side for 6 minutes at a time. That side “has the floor” and can ask the other side questions, interrupt the person, etc. This is how it works in a Congressional hearing where the Members ask questions of the witness and can interrupt the witness at any time. The side in control can assign the “floor” to a single team member to use or control may be shared among multiple team members. The important feature is the side in control has full control and can interrupt the opposing side if they feel the questions are not being answered and the other side is running down the clock and not answering the question. There is no limit to the topics covered in the 6 minutes. We suggest one questioner and one topic for each 6 minute slot, but that is just a recommendation.
We are happy to negotiate a different time limit for each side per question.
Questions are not shown to the other side in advance so you’ll need to think on your feet.
Teams can have up to 12 people on each side inside the debate room. This provides complete coverage on all topic areas, yet keeps the number of participants manageable.
Teams must be populated with actual real people with real names and verifiable identity. All must be on video. No disguises, no altering voices, no hiding of identities. We are not here to play games.
Teams will disclose the names of the participants on their side at least 24 hours prior to the debate.
The team captains will agree on a mutually agreeable date/time for the debate which shall be set at least 1 week before the debate time.
A live Coin flip decides who starts.
Rule option #2
We are also happy with a non moderated debate where each side speaks for a maximum of 3 minutes at a time and it goes back and forth between the sides for 3 hours.
Ground rules
Breaking rules more than 3 times excludes you from the rest of debate.
No ad hominem attacks.
Team members must keep their remarks focused on answering the question from the other side. You cannot change the topic.
What’s in it for both sides
Address BOTH misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in a single debate. Both are key objectives of each side.
The debate rules are completely symmetrical. No side has any advantage.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/covid...ate-topics
COVID vaccine debate topics
If anyone accepts our debate offer, there are a few things we'd love to talk about.
There is so much to talk about. Here’s a partial list.
I offered $1M up front to the members of the FDA and CDC outside committee to just sit down with me for a Q&A session. Nobody accepted. I guess they don’t want to talk about any of these issues. And don’t worry, the press will never ask them any of these questions!
Slide decks
Vaccine essentials (source slides)
Vaccine policies (source slides)
All you need to know (source slides)
180 questions about the COVID vaccines that nobody wants to answer (slides PDF, slides source)
Vaccine safety
We have 8 different ways showing the vaccines have killed over 150,000 Americans so far. How can all 8 methods be wrong? How come nobody took my $1M offer for finding an error in Crawford’s analysis? Do I need to increase the amount? After all, everyone knows it must be wrong so it’s an easy $1M for someone. We don’t get it.
The CDC says nobody has died from the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Surely, you can’t believe that, can you? Peter Schirmacher showed without a doubt that at least 30% to 40% of the deaths within 2 weeks after vaccination were caused by the vaccine. Someone is lying. Do you have an expert more qualified than Schirmacher who claims he’s wrong?
Why were there 4X as many cardiac arrests in the treatment group than the placebo group in the clinical trial. The VAERS data shows very clearly a 450X increase in cardiac events post vaccine. Isn’t it possible that those deaths could have been caused by the vaccine? How was that possibility ruled out?
Dr Toby Rogers found we’ll kill 117 kids for each kid we save from COVID. Is this acceptable? Did he get it wrong? How? What is the correct risk-benefit analysis that we should be using that shows this number?
How come sports players are dying on the field at a rate 60 times higher than normal?
The Pfizer data presented at the CDC meeting showed the VAERS data for myocarditis is at least 5X under-reported. How come the CDC hasn’t said anything? Doesn’t the new updated myocarditis rate then cause us to stop?
Every physician we talk to says there are higher rates of everything post-vaccine than pre-vaccine. How is that possible?
Can we see evidence that the rates of myocarditis is lower with COVID than the vaccine, e.g., from actual clinical practices? We’d love to see this data.
What is the stopping condition for these vaccines? How many deaths are OK? Or does it even matter? So if we kill 10M people is that OK?
Were you OK that the stopping condition was never defined for the vaccine? Is this the new way we do medicine now?
VAERS analysis
VAERS analysis shows clearly that these vaccines kill more people than they save. Did we get it wrong?
VAERS shows causality due to time proximity and dose dependency. Why won’t anyone from the CDC acknowledge this? We can satisfy all 5 Bradford-Hill critera. So we can prove the vaccines caused these injuries including death.
If the CDC is telling the truth that there are no deaths from the vaccine, how do you explain the causality numbers in VAERS?
We calculate a URF of 41 using the CDC methodology and the VAERS numbers. What is the correct number and how did we goof?
How come there are more VAERS events reported this year than all 30 years combined? It isn’t overreporting since individual providers report exactly the same statistic, like 2000 cases this year and 0 in the last 11 years.
Why are there over 4,000 adverse events in VAERS elevated by 10X or more over baseline?
What was the cause of the deaths of the 14 kids the CDC analyzed? These were not “normal” deaths. So what “caused” them? Bleeding in the brain??? Why is this showing up this year yet no record of it in 30 years of VAERS history for that age range. Isn’t that a big suspicious?
VAERS shows this is the deadliest vaccine in human history, even with a URF of 1. So why are we allowing it?
Can we bust the CDC claim about causality? It’s time to put that one to bed, isn’t it?
How come John Su isn’t defending himself against our allegations that he didn’t calculate the VAERS URF and nobody from the CDC will come to his defense either?
Effectiveness
How about that Harvard study? It shows the line is sloping the wrong way. How do you explain that? It seems pretty incriminating?
How come the US has 150X times higher cases per capita than Uttar Pradesh which has just an 11% vaccination rate.
If the vaccines are so effective than how can a New York hospital have a 90% admission of vaccinated patients in an area with a 50% vaccination rate?
The Pfizer study shows 20 people who got the drug died vs. 14 who got the placebo. How can anyone conclude that the drug is the better option if you want to stay alive?
Isn’t vaccine efficacy a statistical illusion?
How come the PCR tests for the vaccinated and unvaccinted look the same?
FDA and CDC committees
OK, so no NNTV or risk-benefit analysis showing VAERS deaths. Is this the new standard for risk-benefit analysis? Rate the risk-benefit analysis on a scale of 1 to 10 in quality.
They said the rate of myocarditis is more for COVID than the vaccine. Sure, if you fudge the VAERS data with a URF of 1, you can show that. But come on, can you show me a single clinician that has stats like that? Are these people living on our planet?
Fraud
Why is Gavin Newsom not taking the $5M for giving us a blank piece of paper. Most sane people would take that offer in a heartbeat. Is he hiding something or is there a legit reason for the bizarre behavior?
How about the case of Maddie de Garay? Isn’t that clinical trial fraud? The FDA head promised to investigate and did nothing? How come you aren’t holding them accountable? A permanent paralysis in the treatment group is something people should be aware of, isn’t it? Or is this the new norm in medicine?
How about fraud in the Pfizer study. It’s a double blind study, yet there were 5X the exemptions in the treatment group than the placebo group. That was bigger than the effect size. How come nobody said anything?
Jessica Rose’s paper on myocarditis showing it isn’t limited to kids was pulled by the publisher for no reason. Nobody complained. Is this the new norm that anything that goes against the narrative is censored? What did you do about it?
Mandates
Do you agree with the CDC (under FOIA from Aaron Siri) that recovered people cannot spread the virus. Therefore, those who are recovered should certainly be exempt
Do you agree that people who recover from COVID and get it again won’t be hospitalized or die? Got a counterexample?
Can we see the risk-benefit analysis showing mandates are a good idea? And how do you tradeoff risking my life for someone else’s life?
If the vaccine works, why do we need mandates? If the vaccine don’t work, why do we need mandates?
Do you agree with this? “COVID vaccine mandates are necessary because the protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn't protect the protected.”
Mitigation
Let’s chat about masking. Fauci said they were useless, then 1 month later, they are required. Did the laws of physics change in March 2020?
Early treatments
Why aren’t we using early treatment protocols like Fareed and Tyson with a 99.76% reduction in hospitalization and 100% reduction in death?
Why is NIH ignoring fluvoxamine? Are we about saving lives or enriching the drug companies? Why isn’t anyone in the medical community speaking out? Is science dead? Is this medical treatment dictated by the NIH?
Hypocrisy
Newsom is mandating our kids get the vaccine, but his kids are unvaccinated. If it is safe for our kids, how come it isn’t safe for his kids?
Censorship
Why is the White House censoring critics rather than debating them?
Did you speak out about the censorship of early treatment protocols?
Were the techniques used against Mercola really necessary? What is the biggest piece of misinformation he has given? Let’s chat about whether it was correct or not.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/do-yo...ver-want-a
Do you know why they NEVER want a live debate?
For some people, it's because they communicate better in writing. For other people, it can be because they aren't an expert on the topic and don't want to be exposed in public.
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...51x475.png
Christine Massey, whose background is in biostatistics (cancer research) wrote an open letter claiming my post which claimed that the experts I talked to say that virus has been isolated are wrong and that the virus hasn’t been “isolated.”
Here’s my original post:
Has the virus been isolated? Yes.
At-a-Glance The virus against which COVID vaccines have been developed has been isolated and experiments could be done on animals in specialized labs that can safely handle certain viruses, rather than conducting an experiment on us. Such experiments could include biodistribution studies and could elucidate what happens to animals that are vaccinated an…
Read more
a month ago · 586 likes · 1,401 comments · Steve Kirsch