The Kuiper Belt Aliens, Fact or Fiction ?

[Golden Winged SnakeOiLion]

No, MC needs to show proof that she is in contact with an advanced civilization. That should not be so hard.

Why don't we try and find out for ourselves if it's fact or fiction, all you gotta do is learn how to scan the solar system.

[Golden Winged SnakeOiLion]

but I didn't communicate with anyone from Malaysia either, which doesn't mean Malaysians don't exist, god dammit.

There are numerous articles, photos, movies, etc. from and about Malaysia. It is already proven that Malaysia exists. Different people have communicated with people from Malaysia or have met people from there or were even there. There are encyclopedia entries written about it. Therefore Malaysia pretty much exists. There is no single source of information claiming it to exist or forcing me to believe that it exists.

No such thing for the KBA. Single source of information. KBA = fiction.

[Scarlet]

I don't see one single reason why I wouldn't believe MC.
You say you doubt these claims, and I ask why,because I can prove you brought these conclusions using only what you previously knew about Kuiper Belt, and that's nothing. Why don't you explore it yourself first before concluding?

OK, there's one single source of information because other sources keep their mouths shut.

There was maybe one source of information for many things more that are later proven to be true, so don't be skeptical, or narrow-minded to such things.

MC is a single source of information for various things, such as techniques which cannot be found anywhere else. Why would I reject knowing how to open DNA codes or find out anything that's useful for me only if one single person told me so?

Feel free to check the information, if you have will (and abillity) to do so. I haven't developed mine yet, but I cannot say somebody else hasn't.
It seems to me you want a postcard with a beautiful insectoid lady smiling and sending you kisses from Kuiper Belt, but that's not how it goes.


People thought the Earth was flat and riddiculed everyone who had the evidences for opposite, because no one else WANTED to believe them and becuase authorities spoke differently. Why is this case different?

[DreamTime]

There will also be those people who need "proof" before they will believe in anything, and then there will be the other group who just "believe" in things or "know" it to be true. Those groups will never agree with one another. I live in a family of those different groups and it can cause quite a bit of arguments. But I just don't see why one has to attack the other. Everyone is entitled to their way of thinking. If you do not agree with what is being said in one of these threads, why not just ignore the thread and move on? Personally, I am in the one group who believes in things that can not be "proven." I suppose I could start multiple arguments also, but time is too short to be wasted in arguing and trying to change people's way of thinking. In the end, everything will become clear.

[Mercy Now]

MC said...That's use of the left hemisphere exclusively.
You cannot even imagine what would happen if I used my left hemisphere exclusively.
Yes,I believe into this,as you put it,because I obtained the info myself.You cannot check up on me because you are using the left hemisphere.This is also because of your programming.You have given in to your programming

 

Sariel replied...Gut feeling is actually from right brain hemisphere.

And nope. I used my programming, but never allowed to be used by it.

 The truth is.....

Experimentation has shown that the two different sides, or hemispheres, of the brain are responsible for different manners of thinking. The following table illustrates the differences between left-brain and right-brain thinking:


Left Brain
 
Logical
Sequential

Rational

Analytical

Objective

Looks at parts

Random
***********************

Right Brain

Intuitive

Holistic
Synthesizing

Subjective

Looks at wholes

[Sariel]

[user=61][/user][size="3"]As of 2006, astronomers have resolved dust disks believed to be Kuiper belt-like structures around nine stars other than the Sun.[/size]They appear to fall into two categories: wide belts, with radii of over 50 AU, and narrow belts (like our own Kuiper belt) with diameters of between 20 and 30 AU and relatively sharp boundaries. Most known debris discs around other stars are fairly young, but the two images on the right, taken by the Hubble Space Telescope in January, 2006, are old enough (roughly 300 million years) to have settled into stable configurations. The left image is a "top view" of a wide belt, and the right image is an "edge view" of a narrow belt. The black central circle is produced by the camera's coronagraph which hides the central star to allow the much fainter disks to be seen.[86][87] Beyond this, 15-20% of solar-type stars have an observed infrared excess which is believed to indicate massive Kuiper Belt like structures.[8

On January 19, 2006 the first spacecraft mission to explore the Kuiper belt, New Horizons, was launched. The mission, headed by Alan Stern of the Southwest Research Institute, will arrive at Pluto on July 14, 2015 and, circumstances permitting, will continue on to study another as-yet undetermined KBO.

Bunch of rocks.

And where is Avatar, he was very enthusiastic about those KBAs. Oh, he left after an argue with one of our members. Poor boy. :(

[MC]

Oh yea,whose that info from?
Give me a good idea why I should believe info such as this?
Who owns all the prominent institutes,institutions?
I rest my case,as far as your "proof" is concerned Sariel,because,you have provided none.You would rather believe government institutions and those working for them than anyone else,so be it.

[Octahedron]

Was HCF member Lion Cub not also asserting about the monitoring/communicating with the KBA, as far I can remember correctly ?

[Astrojewels]

The decision to keep this thread open for a debatable conversation has nothing to do with friendship, taking sides, or seeing that anyone is wrong or right, you have a difference of opinion, and as ‘moderator’, I really have to wonder why intelligent adults would need moderating in the first place. I made a statement that any malicious threads will be deleted and that is what I am about to do!

[Golden Winged SnakeOiLion]

I understand and value your pov and opinion and I do not ask proof for everything. But when people predict doomsday or claim alien invasions I have to ask proof. What do you think will happen to this forum if some doomsday cult arises from it? then you're in the news and you have no longer any control over it. And trust me, you don't like it.

As for insults, I have been insulted by MC late January and nobody cared.

http://hyperspacecafe.com/view_post.php?post_id=52079

.I open this thread,and Richard allows some jack ass idiot (snake oil)access to a forum like this where I end up getting accused of all sorts of things because I was demonized.

That's the reason I removed my kid gloves.

There will also be those people who need "proof" before they will believe in anything, and then there will be the other group who just "believe" in things or "know" it to be true. Those groups will never agree with one another. I live in a family of those different groups and it can cause quite a bit of arguments. But I just don't see why one has to attack the other. Everyone is entitled to their way of thinking. If you do not agree with what is being said in one of these threads, why not just ignore the thread and move on? Personally, I am in the one group who believes in things that can not be "proven." I suppose I could start multiple arguments also, but time is too short to be wasted in arguing and trying to change people's way of thinking. In the end, everything will become clear.