Viagra-mail terrorism

[Andrea]

Richard-
Reading those emails literally made me sick, physically sick. My stomach just got very queezy and My brain felt overloaded. I hope I never get one of those in my inbox. :puke:
Hope the image isnt too gross. Its appropriate though.

[Polly]

Andrea you have given an affirmation that the emails have bad energy attached.  Not everyone will notice it though.

 

[Octahedron]

..... Looking at these examples, the words are not misspelled just put together incorrectly, so perhaps it is someone who is very intelligent and has purposely put these words together to look gibberish! There could be many triggers within.

Exactly, the words are literally spelled "correct words".

It's like a software-program is behind the re-placement of the words and dots.

The name of the email-adresses seems there is a computer behind it which generates millions of gibberish email-names to dump billions of spam messages on the net.

Triggers are probably also put in these constructs.

Third world country - IP senders often means only the "formal email addresses" are sold to be used on Western European or American networks.

It's the same kind of idiotic messages and grammar put in RAP music and Teen cultures.

[Astrojewels]

I think Andrea is proof that the words are intentionally put together to form some type of message and trigger, it looks as though her pineal and solar plexus were affected through reading the emails. Yes rap is a different language to some of us, but I would say it is more slang-street talk and not words missing out of sentences like these emails. The emails remind me of that written language where words are intentionally turned around, as long as the first and last letters are in the correct positions the words still read the same, like I ‘konw yuor wathcnig’ but I have forgot the name of it.

[Octahedron]

Yes Astrojewels,  I recognize what you mention. 

It's an attempt to promote robotic communication because robots don't make errors in writing (like spelling checkers).

This is the first step to control "free writing" in emails like they want to control "free speech".

Besides this, it is a call for standards in every aspect of communication to lower the self-image of the messenger AND the receiver.

Something "sensitive":

the English language is an example to lower the expressive power of words.

I'm Dutch and the Dutch language is very close to German.

As a child, I watched German TV-programs because German is easy to understand for little Dutch children because the language is clear and well organized. Also every Dutch child will understand German spoken words, however speaking German correctly is less easy.

At school I had big problems with English, because it felt it depleted my mind and it was given with sa ense of "popular nasty culture" with no discipline and logic; also many pop-songs and TV-programs were English/American.

From school, I do remember the gublethegub-English of  "MacBeth of Shakespeare" which I hated; because it fragmented my mind.

I liked French as a language which was quite similar as English in many respects, but the French language is more "complete" and "pure" and "feelings can be transmitted" in French words.

I was forced to choose at least 1 modern foreign language. I did choose English, because I knew it was becoming the global language.

3 examples how English language depletes the Dutch mind:

1)

German:   Meine Mutter ist hier.

Dutch:      Mijn moeder is hier.

English:    My mother is here.

2)

German:  Hilf mich, Ich will ein brot.

Dutch:     Help me, ik wil een brood.

English:   Help me, I want a bread.

3)

German:  Ja, Ich habe grosse Schuhe gekauft.

Dutch:    Ja, ik heb grote schoenen gekocht.

English:  Yes, I have bought large shoes.

[Astrojewels]

I agree octahedron,
The English language is very intricate, I believe the system is constructed to confuse, when first learning children have no problem with spoken words, yet writing and understanding how words are put together and the sounds they make is totally different, so many English words just don’t make sense, and they are always changing the rules.
Interesting examples.

[Octahedron]

I agree octahedron,
The English language is very intricate, I believe the system is constructed to confuse, when first learning children have no problem with spoken words, yet writing and understanding how words are put together and the sounds they make is totally different, so many English words just don’t make sense, and they are always changing the rules.
Interesting examples.

Yes, that's my feeling from day 1, I got English at school.

I believe David Icke had publiced an article about a conspiracy to create the English language since the Middle Ages as a global language to "lower" discipline in communication, orchestrated by Free Masons.

 

[Astrojewels]

I would tend to believe that octahedron, if you are confused from the start how will you ever understand it? here in Australia we follow the UK grammar rules,I prefer the USA grammar system, it is easier and makes more sense, not lots of difference mostly words spelt the way they sound.

[Octahedron]

Grammar & Idiom are 2 total different unlogically connected things in English language.

English is easy to understand by Western-Europeans; but it breaks every discipline and logic when figuring what the language is really telling.

The Dutch sentence "Ik liep naar school" can be translated to more than 7 variations in English:

Examples in English:

I walked to school  (most simple one for Dutch to understand)

I have walked to school

I've walked to school

I was walking to school

I was being walking to school

I have been walking to school

I did walk to school

I had been walking to school

etc etc.

WHAT the HELL do I have to choose here ?; I still don't know anything straightful thing about the grammar of English (and my English teachers in the classroom didn't either).

The Key-grammar words  "to have", "to be" and "to do", and ""to shall" and "to will" are raping the minds when trying to organize English grammar.

[Astrojewels]

Octahedron,
There are many out there that are excellent with English grammar, yet I think the general population is so so about it, and most of us would not pick up on the error of where to position ‘to have’ ‘to be’ etc, and we would just read it and it would make sense. There are typos in most books, and all I say is thank you Microsoft for the wonderful program ‘word’.
But there is a new language- the language of text messaging, you have to be young to understand it, and sometimes these words really throw me and I need translation. Let me ask you, Will this generation modify the English grammar rules? And does it create them to become grammar illiterate?