Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What is a Cult? Engineering Selective Population Outrage
#1
https://mistermicawber.substack.com

Engineering Selective Outrage about Ukraine
Will the Population fall for yet another psy-op?


Remember?  We’re in a pandemic, right? What happened to it?

It’s a medical miracle:  the pandemic ended so abruptly one could be forgiven for wondering whether Putin single-handedly wiped it out.  The shift in the narrative is so seamless—and so deftly managed—it’s almost hard to see.  Watching the population change direction en masse often reminds me of how fish school together; how they shift directions nearly simultaneously, and in a seemingly coordinated fashion.

The common response to my characterization above is invariably, more or less::  “well, that stands to reason, we’re all reacting to an objective situation.”  And I agree, and wholeheartedly.  But what exactly has changed objectively?  Has the science or the data about Covid changed?  Nope. And it cannot be Putin’s actions, which occur all over the world with distressing regularity.

What, exactly, is the population responding to then?  Let’s return to our fish analogy: when schooling, each fish is responding to the immediate flow of its environment:  currents, changes in temperature, dangerous/open areas, potential predators, as well as mirroring the fish immediately around them.

And who creates this “environment” for the population?  The media. After a century of experience, they are masters at shaping and leveraging group think dynamics, and minutely controlling the population’s focus. And new technologies (virtually all eyes on screens nearly 24/7, the emergence of nonlinear networked communication, social media platforms, etc.) have only extended their power.

One might even say that the media—who provide the moment-by-moment flow of experience—are the population’s environment.

Share

To mix our metaphors, we live in a vast virtue-signaling “hive.” And when we observe shifts in narratives, we are witnessing the hive mind at work.  It’s breathtaking, really.

Suddenly, overnight, there is complete and hysterical unanimity—in the media, in educational institutions, in corporate America—that Putin is “evil” and we have to go to war against him.  Suddenly, the population is supposed to mirror this outrage.  Suddenly the pandemic has evaporated, and “Ukraine Good!  Putin Bad!” is all the rage, with many in the population virtue-signaling their conformity to the narrative by fatuously brandishing Ukrainian flags and so on. 

And just as abruptly, politicians have dropped the mask and distancing theater; and officials all over America are ending the Covid restrictions.

But this shift away from the Covid narrative has nothing to do science or data. Even if you believe their numbers (and I don’t), nothing has objectively changed.
This was never about a virus; it’s about theater, control and submission.

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...5x364.jpeg

Perhaps you can now see—even amidst the chaos—how deliberate and finely coordinated it all is?
What are they distracting the population from?

Changing the subject from “we’re all going to die from Covid!” to “we’re all going to die from Putin!” has many purposes:

    it trains the population to focus on their approved narratives (psychologically speaking, a new and fresh crisis is periodically necessary);

    it keeps the population mesmerized by fear (powerful motivator);

    and by “opening up” they can (perhaps) partly revive the economy for the coming election.

Moreover a new fear-engendering crisis can also induce a kind of amnesia. They want the population to forget about the two years of illegal lockdowns and requirements, the economic/financial destruction, the oppression of fundamental liberties, the harassment, the depression and loneliness. To forget it all. (Don’t worry, another pandemic will “emerge” when they need to change the narrative again.)

Nevertheless, when the media and political leaders are on a single talking point—and when everyone is expected to mirror it, and dissenters are silenced—you might want to consider what they are trying to distract you from.

Here’s a sampling of possibilities of what they might want to distract you from:

    Explosive Vaccine Information: Pfizer has been forced to unseal some of their documents on the safety and effectiveness of its“vaccines”: see especially page 30ff: Pfizer

        Remember, Pfizer did not want the public to see these documents for 75 years, and asked the courts to seal them for as long. Not suspicious at all. More are on the way.

        Class action lawsuits are coming. The “vaccine” companies are very likely to lose their liability protection; which is primarily why their (and Moderna’s) stock is plummeting. (See how the Ukraine “crisis” hides it? Fake narratives have endless functions.)

        Bitchute and other youtube alternative platforms are avalanching with videos of angry and remorseful doctors and nurses, as well as “vaxxed” civilians — angry that they took the “vaccine” and angry that they gave it to anyone. I mean a pitchfork angry.

    Major news on decertifying the 2020 “Election”: Special Counsel Michael Gableman has recently called for Wisconsin to be decertified. This is major news. But crickets, eh?

    Utter failure of the Covid psy-op: the population is waking up.

        Thousands of trucks are surrounding DC on the beltway. It’s effectively a blockade; yet the police cannot legally and technically do anything. Will the DeepState sabotage it? False flag incoming?

        FOIA Request has found that the US Government paid $1B in US Taxpayer Dollars to the media for programming the Covid narrative (or, for what they call a "comprehensive media campaign.") Now we know we are paying for our own propagandization.

    “Vaccine” injuries/death statistics are looking grimmer every day: shocking numbers are coming out the UK’s HSA: the fully vaccinated now account for 9 out of 10 “Covid deaths” while triple vaxxed account for 4 out of every 5. Deaths among the vaxxed are rising dramatically; and falling precipitously among the non-vaxxed/purebloods.

    Pfizer and Moderna have both admitted in federal filings that mRNA technology is gene therapy: once again, a “conspiracy theory” becomes conspiracy fact.

When losing an argument, people often change the subject, swiftly and surreptitiously. Something like “WWIII is coming!!!” might work, no?
War in Ukraine?

The qualities that enable a person to become leader of a nation—and stay there and be effective—are generally not the same of those of a Saint.  It’s not exactly breaking news that Vladimir Putin isn’t a saint; then again, the political leaders and media who are currently condemning his actions aren’t either.  So before we are infected with their overblown and emotionally-manipulative rhetoric, perhaps we should step back a bit to assess what is actually happening in Ukraine?

What is Putin’s declared objective?  To decapitate the installed and brutal government of Ukraine (more on this below) with minimal force and bloodshed; and replace it with a legitimate government that governs for the Ukrainian people; and to protect Russia from NATO encroachment on its borders.  Doubtless it’s far more complex in aims and methods; but that, in a nutshell, is what he says he’s trying to do.

What is Putin actually doing?  He has directed surgical strikes upon DoD-funded bioweapons labs (not even close to being “debunked,” which is their linguistic “tell”)—and other strategic assets—in various cities across the Ukraine; and he is stationing troops in key areas.

And, of course, military action is always messy and tragic; and Ukraine is a fluid, developing, and murky situation.

However, despite the “news” presenting a never-ending stream of horror—forgive me for not trusting the very same people who convinced billions to take useless and poisonous “vaccines” by conjuring a pandemic that wasn’t there—when I look at the various live feeds, it looks rather quiet and peaceful.   

I’m just pointing out the difference. Here are a sampling of live cam views of Kyiv, including Maidan Square: 

Three reasons why the “outrage” about Ukraine is selective

First, many of the people in the media, corporate and political spheres aren’t condemning Putin’s actions because of their “outrage” at his violence.

How do we know this?   

Because these very same people—politicians, corporate, and media leaders—are calling for violence as a response. Which rather negates their outrage; you can’t have it both ways.

And this, despite the risk of a global nuclear conflict. Indeed, they seem to be fanning the flames. Senator Graham’s recent comments on television and on Twitter are a case in point:

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...3x343.jpeg

Have we lost our minds?  What sitting Senator or any major political figure has ever said this about a leader of a major nuclear/military world power?  Particularly when tensions are so high?  It’s almost like they are trying to cause chaos and nuclear war.

(For my fellow Anons out there:  notice the time stamp adds up to 17; I personally believe Graham, among many others, is being forced to play a role as part of the Q Operation; we are watching a “movie” that is meant to wake up normies.  Think about it:  why wasn’t he banned from Twitter?  Compare this to Trump’s allegedly “mean” tweets for which he was banned. More on this in my next article here on this platform.)

Not only is this pose (about being “outraged” at Putin’s violence) the height of hypocrisy—meaning, this is not their real motive, whatever else it is—but they want to foment chaos.  Almost like they have something to hide.  More on that below. 

Second, there have been dozens of wars with millions of casualties and many thousands of deaths in the last 20 years—many of them involving the Ukraine—and the people who are outraged now didn’t express “outrage” then.  At least not in the ludicrously unified and uniform manner as now.  The Obama administration, for example, almost dwarfs every single previous administration in the amount of ordnance unleashed.  Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan have all received more than 350,000 US bombs during this period alone.

Where was all this “outrage” then?  Now, suddenly, everyone is supposed to be “outraged” about a week of bombing in Ukraine?  Overnight, suddenly the entire media, nearly the entire political class, and educational and corporate worlds are simultaneously unanimous in their hysterical outrage?  Really?
This isn’t a photo of Kyiv. It’s a picture of Kenosha, Wisconsin being burned to the ground by Black Lives Matter. Outraged yet? Or are we waiting for the media to tell us to be outraged?

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...40x320.png

Third, the people who are claiming to be “outraged” are suffering from radical presentism; and are “standing” with the very people who played a very large part in bringing about this mess in the first place.

Whatever we think of Putin’s actions—and I am not “standing” for or with Russia or Putin—the people claiming to be “outraged” may think they’re “standing with Ukraine.” But in fact they’re standing with the DeepState’s brutal puppet government (and it’s relentless drive towards the NWO.) They are “standing” against the majority of the Ukrainian people. They are standing against “democracy.”

To see this we have to look to a bit of history.
A Bit of History for Context
What is the Nature of War?

When we imagine war, most of us have an image of something like WWI in our minds: two sides shelling one another. But war is a far more complex reality; and kinetic action is not an essential ingredient.

War is fundamentally about destabilizing and weakening a region or a people or a nation. It’s about reducing resources (say, through inflation, or global warming taxes, or economic sanctions, etc.) it’s about disabling infrastructure (cyber attacks; or say, by not rebuilding roads and bridges despite funding for it - notice the crumbling infrastructure around us?); it’s about undermining the basic institutions of family and Church/faith; it’s about undermining the person; it’s about sowing confusion in the population with ideologies (more about this in future articles); it’s about making a population sick ; it’s about making life harder; it’s about fatiguing a population (feeling it yet?)

War is about disrupting our lives at a deep level.
Color Revolutions

Disrupting our lives at a deep level is also what Color Revolutions are about; think of them as covert, slow-motion, non-kinetic warfare.

Color Revolutions are complex models of destabilization in a region or country. Part of that destabilization process, in addition to creating and leveraging mass movements, and thereby social and financial chaos, is undermining election integrity at every level, and thereby installing a government; and thereby establishing control by proxy.

As I’ve argued extensively elsewhere, we’re in the midst of a Color Revolution right now in the US. It is the most soul-twisting warfare ever imagined: it can even get people to pay for their own propaganda; and persuade them to virtue-signal about poisoning themselves - and, sadly, others; including children, sometimes their own. Truly amazing, heart-rending and horrifying stuff.

Here is an accessible overview of the multi-level complexity and nature of Color Revolutions: “The Color Revolution Model: An Exposé of the Core Mechanics”: (A careful reader will note the striking similarity between what is being outlined and what we have been witnessing over the past few decades here in the US. The Soros funded groups, such as Antifa/BLM have been sowing confusion and fomenting chaos; also the “pandemic”; and the election irregularities, etc.)
Color Revolutions have been orchestrated around the globe to wrest control of nations; we have seen this particularly in eastern Europe (Georgia, Moldova and Belarus)

Putin has long resisted and actively fought against the growing NWO empire; he talks about it often, understands it deeply, and has successfully remained outside its influence. He is no longer controllable through the SWIFT financial network (remember how they used to revoke Russia’s status when they didn’t like his actions?); nor is he saddled with a Rothschilds central bank. All of which partly explains why he is so demonized.

However, Putin has also long-alleged that Color Revolutions were being used by the NWO to destabilize and undermine the former-soviet regions immediately around Russia.

And Putin is, in fact, correct about this.

The ultimate end of Color Revolutions is establishing control by proxy: deliberate chaos followed by rigged election, coups, installed governments.

Just like we have in Ukraine now.
The 2014 “EuroMaidan Revolution”—far from being a triumph of democracy—was a carefully-orchestrated de coup d'état by Soros and other NWO operatives   

In November, 2013, Ukrainian’s democratically-elected President Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign the EU “free trade” agreement, thus signaling he did not want to align with the NWO agenda.  (Later, in January, 2014, he confirmed this inclination when Ukraine and Russia inked an comprehensive economic agreement.)   

Soon after Yanukovych’s refusal, the so-called “EuroMaidan” demonstrations—funded and organized by Soros (he bragged about it publicly) and other NWO operatives—fomented confusion in the population, chaos in the country, and eventually lead (in February 2014) to the “ousting” of Yanukovych, and the installation of a new and pro-NWO government.

It was a classic Color Revolution. It should be noted here that Andriy Parubiy, co-founder of the fascist Social-National Party of Ukraine (SNPU)—a neo-nazi party funded and weaponed by NWO actors—was the “commander” in charge of the “EuroMaidan Revolution,” which was directly organized and implemented by his neo-nazi paramilitary units.  (Parubiy also served as the chairman of the Ukrainian parliament from April 2016 until August 2019. So just to be clear: actual Nazism is officially accepted and condoned in the current Ukrainian government.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-RyOaFwcEw

The Ukrainian people—a large percent of whom were Yanukovych supporters and solidly pro-Russian—protested and refused to accept the installed government.  (All of this sound familiar? Remember the Soros-funded Antifa/BLM chaos? The chaotic election? In the US, we’re about here.)

The protests in Ukraine continued to escalate And the installed government—as well as NWO-funded neo-nazi paramilitary groups, who were and are officially recognized—brutally put down and silenced the protesters.  (And this is what we’re on the cusp of here.)

    In March 2014, Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk declared—sanctioned by a people’s referendum—their independence from Ukraine, and also declared themselves annexed to the Russian Federation.

    The Presidents of the Donetsk and Lugansk provinces ordered the evacuation of the civilian population into the Russian Federation.

    And, Putin launched a military invasion into the Donbass region to restore peace. 

And tragically, the aforementioned and officially-sanctioned neo-nazi militia groups were allowed—for years—to occupy, terrorize and brutalize these provinces. (Where was the outrage?)

And so, alas, the entire region—long untidy and chaotic—was now an unholy mess.
Hey, let’s play “Spot the Difference”! 

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...5x461.jpeg

Where was all this “outrage”and posing about how we need to “protect democracy” and “stand for justice” when a duly-elected President was ousted? When a pro-NWO government was installed? When protesters around the Ukraine were brutally repressed by an illegitimate government and its neo-nazi paramilitary units?

    When protesters were brutally put down—and thousands killed—in Donetsk and Luhansk?  (Eight years of bombing, thousands killed, countless victims, hundreds of children dead, and the normal war atrocities of torture, kidnapping, rape.)

    When the installed government and the neo-nazi units bombed the Donbass for eight years?

    When 48 burned alive in Odessa union hall?  (No international court proceedings, as are planned for the alleged crimes of Russian forces.)

The human rights violations in the Ukraine and the crimes of the Neo-nazi militias—both planned and funded by globalist NWO operatives—have been assiduously ignored for decades by the media; and therefore by the people who seem to take their cues exclusively from media/political leaders about what or whom they should care about, or when they should be “outraged.”

Allow me to quote Archbishop Viganó, who said it very well:

    “And why are we scandalized today by a Russian intervention in Ukraine, when NATO carried out the same sort of thing in Yugoslavia (1991), Kosovo (1999), Afghanistan (2001), Iraq (2003), and in Libya and Syria (2011), without anyone raising any objections? Not to mention that in the last ten years Israel has repeatedly hit military targets in Syria, Iran and Lebanon to prevent the creation of a hostile armed front on its northern border, and yet no nation has proposed imposing sanctions on Tel Aviv.”

The “Installation” of the Ukrainian government in 2014 isn’t exactly a secret

For example, consider the leaked/intercepted conversation between Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt whereby they discuss choosing the new Ukrainian government after the US/NWO coup.

This conversation took place between then-assistant secretary for European and Eurasian affairs in the Obama state department, Victoria Nuland, and then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt.  This conversation revealed that the U.S. State Department was actively pursuing the ouster of Yanukovych and the installation of opposition leader Yatsenyuk as prime minister.  It is not known exactly when their discussion took place, only that it transpired prior to February 7, 2014, when the conversation was leaked.

During that discussion, Nuland remarked that Jake Sullivan, the then-national security adviser to Vice President Biden, had informed her that “you need Biden” for the successful installation of Yatsenyuk.  Nuland concluded by telling Pyatt that “Biden’s willing.”  Sullivan now serves as the national security adviser to “Bidan.”

Just two weeks later, on February 22, 2014, Yanukovych was removed as president of Ukraine and three days later Yatsenyuk, Nuland’s preferred candidate, was installed as prime minister of Ukraine.

In other words, the U.S. government had effectively assisted with the removal of a democratically-elected leader who was friendly to Russia, and with the installation of a leader who was selected by the United States.
“We need to protect democracy”

When the DeepState use the word “Democracy”—here in the US as well—they mean their own/controlled “installed” government

Putin isn’t a dictator attacking a democracy; he’s a dictator attacking a NWO installed, brutal crime syndicate. Putin isn’t a “nazi.” Nor is he Hitler. People using such locutions seem to be unaware that a Neo-nazi Party—real nazis, not the fake label that everyone throws around now—actually operates officially Ukraine. So there’s that.

Ukraine has long been a buffer zone between the east and the west; and the region is incredibly complex in every respect. However, despite being a country of immense resources, it’s one of the poorest countries on the continent.

And it’s not hard to explain their poverty. Many of the officials running this “democracy”aren’t even Ukrainian; and a good portion of them also live elsewhere: NYC, London, Zurich, etc. In other words, they have little to no stake in the country; or loyalty to the Ukrainian people.

For his part, Zelensky is a NWO puppet. This “man of the people” owns a $35 million mansion in Sunny Isles Florida (aka, “little Moscow”), and reportedly has $1B in Costa Rican banks. He’s a former actor, pop singer/dancer, and LBQT activist; and can be seen singing and dancing homoerotically all over Youtube. His “policy experts” are nearly all fellow actors/dancers/singers, producers, and filmmakers.

The Ukrainian people are not being served well by a government they never elected but was installed; one that is run by pop artists clowns; and which has no loyalty to the Ukrainian people or their nation.
Putin looks like the aggressor only if you bracket away history and context

In addition to decades of destabilization campaigns via Color Revolutions in the former Soviet nations bordering Russia, NATO has continuously broken agreements to not expand eastwards.

Russia is effectively under military threat just a few miles from its borders.  Imagine a similar threat along the US borders, in Canada, offshore, in Mexico, building up over decades, and against all expressed agreements?

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x547.jpeg

And currently, NATO is preparing to expand to Ukraine, Bosnia, Herzegovina, and Serbia. Russian officials, international relations experts, and Putin himself, have all warned repeatedly that Ukraine was the “bright red line” that NATO cannot cross without consequences.

Aggressive actions have consequences. Sometimes aggressive ones.

                          *****

So to recap, Russia bombs the Ukraine — and suddenly full-scale worldwide hysteria erupts, simultaneously around the media/political world, and with an unanimity that looks full-coordinated?

The outrage the population is being groomed to feel against Russia doesn’t seem real or justified. It rather looks like it was put there by the same forces that brainwashed billions about a fake pandemic. Otherwise, how do you account for the sudden and simultaneous unanimity? How do you account for the discrepancy with respect all the other instances of bombings and violence in the past 20 years, even in the Ukraine itself? “Standing for democracy”? Seriously?

But this time, the leader responsible for the military aggression is beyond the control of the NWO, and is uncovering their operations. So they panic. So they engineer selective outrage in the population.

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...61x326.png

he Hypocrisy is Simply Stunning

The above ought to be enough to get anyone to question the motives behind this propaganda push for total outrage against Russia/Putin.

Among the many other absurdities we could point out:

    Did anyone hear the left screaming “freedom for Canada” when the citizens were getting beaten in the street by their own government just a week or two ago (or Australia, etc.)?

    The same people clamoring for Ukraine’s sovereignty and the sanctity of inviolable borders are the same people that refuse to protect our own southern border. And, incidentally, are ushering in illegal aliens by the millions, and arranged for them to be able to vote (a color revolution tactic, an act of war);

    Remember when it was too expensive ($6B) to secure our own borders?  But Sen McConnell on CSPAN: “Where we’ve ended up is at $14B [You don’t say, Mitch?]…it needs to be passed and it needs to be passed quickly.”  You heard the man.  Give him your money.  And this money will end up in who’s hands again?

    The same people that supported lockdowns, mask mandates, and “get vaccinated or get fired” rules, are the same people that are now screaming about sovereignty, and “freedom for Ukraine!”  They ignored and provoked and even initiated attacks against our own free speech and democracy; but somehow these things now matter there?

    Nearly every major western leader is now pretending to be against authoritarianism after closing businesses, destroying lives, destroy ancient freedoms, send paramilitary to beat up opponents, freeze bank accounts of anyone who goes against the narrative, and declare them terrorists, etc.  It’s truly obscene. 

    And people who allowed their freedoms to be trampled on for two years suddenly now care—because they were told to care— about freedom in a far away place?

    American citizens need to be disarmed; but the Ukrainian citizens need to be armed?

    The Keystone pipeline—shut down by the “Bidan” crew—would have delivered 830,000 barrels of oil per day to the US, more than current daily Russian imports.

    If Trump is/was a Russian asset, then why has Putin invaded former Soviet-regions during the tenure of every single president going back to 2000—except during Trump’s?  And why not invade Ukraine when the alleged Russia-puppet was in the White House?

    Xenophobia is okay now?  As long as it’s against Russians and Russian products?  Why not against China?  The atrocities committed on a daily basis are far worse and far more extensive.  But that would be “Asian hate,” right?  Russian sports plays, opera singers, etc. are all being given “disavow tests”: disavow Russia or you’re fired.  Anyone going against the narrative is censored. Over and over again the same pattern.

    They use big tech to censor us, the DeepState to spy on us, the intelligence agencies to frame us, the media to slander us; they rig elections to disenfranchise us….all the while they claim they are the ones defending democracy, freedom and justice, here and abroad?  See?  It’s the mirror/projection trick again.

They can’t be serious.  Because they really aren’t.  But they want the people to believe they are; and are very good at convincing people they are via the media. 

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...66x420.png

How are the media engineering selective outrage?

We live in a very different world than just a decade ago.  The Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 prohibited the use of government propaganda against its own citizens.  In 2012, Obama signed H.R. 4310, which repealed this long-standing Act.  It’s now entirely legal for the US government to use powerful, military-grade psychological warfare against its own people. 

Remember when the media aired footage from a Kentucky gun range in order to whip up public hysteria about Trump withdrawing troops from Syria?  This sort of thing isn’t an anomaly; it’s how the media operates.  The media are the psychological operations of the DeepState.  Even Fox, who are merely “controlled opposition.”       

During the past week, the media have presented to the world innumerable horror stories about Ukraine (nearly all of which have proven to be completely and utterly fabricated.)

They are creating and orchestrating disinformation campaigns in order to stoke emotions in the population.  Among other methods, the media are using:

    Staged/fake photos/videos (soldiers holding fake rifles; crisis actors; and so on);

    Photos/videos from years ago (often Ukraine in 2014); and/or from other places (China, Afghanistan, etc.);

    Photos/videos from video games (War Thunder, etc.) and movies (Star Wars, etc. - yep, bizarre, but true).

And conversely, the media carefully and selectively prunes what they don’t want you to see.  Allow me to quote Archbishop Viganó again: 

    The mainstream media is careful not to show images of Russian soldiers helping civilians reach safe positions  or organizing humanitarian corridors, which Ukrainian militias fire upon (here and here). Just as it is also silent about the settling of scores, massacres, violence and theft by fringes of the civilian population, to whom Zelensky has given weapons: the videos that can be seen on the internet give an idea of the climate of civil war that has been artfully fueled by the Ukrainian Government. To this we may also add the convicts released to be drafted into the Army and also the volunteers of the foreign legion: a mass of fanatics without rules and without training that will contribute to worsening the situation, making it unmanageable.

Here’s an excellent example of a deliberate disinformation campaign that was initiated by Ukraine government and magnified by the media, with enormous potential consequences.

The AP falsely reported that Putin had bombed a nuclear power plant; and quoted Zelensky, in an emotional speech, saying:

    “[the explosions will mean] the end for everyone.  The end for Europe.  The evacuation of Europe….Only urgent action by Europe can stop the Russian troops.”

And the US Embassy tweeted out its version of this message:

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...4x340.jpeg

But the trouble was, none of it was true. It was a complete and utter fabrication. Can you imagine a more irresponsible, potentially catastrophic and manipulative ploy?

This isn’t some anomaly; this is part of a flow of disinformation that is meant to emotionally unify the world against Putin.   

Some more examples:

    That Russian tank that allegedly ran over a civilian car in Kyiv; it was a Strela-10 Ukrainian air defense vehicle.  Not Russian.

    The photo of Zelenskyy in military garb with a helmet on are from a 2021 Ukrainian border inspection trip.

    The “Ghost of Kyiv” MiG-19 shooting down a Russian Su-35 was from a Digital Combat Simulator animation video.

    The “Ghost of Kyiv” identified as Samuyil Hyde is actually a pic of Sam Hyde, an internet prankster.

    The photo of two children (girl in pink with teddy bear, boy saluting) watching convoy pass is from 2016.

    The photos of a woman saying goodbye to her husband/boyfriend—going off to fight Putin’s Russian forces—is from a movie.

    The “snake island” “martyrs” were not killed; we have video of all 83 of them being transported to Sevastopol.

And so on….

Ask yourself:  where is the actual footage of this invasion?  They are quite literally conjuring realities don’t exist.  Exactly as they conjured the fake pandemic.
What are the media and political leaders so afraid of?

Here are two clues:

    “Without Ukraine the Global [New World] Order will not survive.”  (Nathaniel Rothschilds, recent interview)

    “We know that we are not only fighting for Ukraine, but also for the New World Order.” (Ukrainian parliamentarian Kira Rudik recently to Fox News, while clasping a Kalashnikov.  (Btw, can you imagine if she were American? She would have been vilified as “racist,” or “redneck,” or something similarly bizarre.)

The plain answer is this:  they fear the world finding out about the DeepState/NWO operations centers in Ukraine:  including Bioweapons labs, child/sex trafficking hubs, and staging for financial/political interference-operations around the world.
Those infamous “bioweapons labs”: the evolution of the official narrative was driven by the work of Anons

Nota bene: it’s almost like a magic spell: when the media uses the word “debunked” this is both a linguistic “tell” of their panic; and a signal to the population to repeat this word, which they obediently do. The “hive mind” in operation.

Anons have claimed since the very first moments of this conflict:  the US military bioweapons labs in Ukraine were being run by the EcoHealth Alliance; this is the same company who performed gain of function for Fauci in Wuhan.  There are at least 12 DoD bioweapons labs that operate in the Ukraine.  China claims it can prove 26 in Ukraine, as well as hundreds around the world.

These labs are reported to be mainly involved in the study and production of the disease-causing agents of smallpox, anthrax, and botulism.  The facilities are located in the following cities:  Odessa, Vinnytsia, Uzhgorod, Lviv (three labs), Kbarkiv, Kyiv (four labs), Ternopil.  These are the exact same cities being bombed.

But look at how all this evolved, which was driven step-by-step by Anons who work tirelessly around the globe to disrupt and disable the false narratives:

First, the existence of the bioweapons labs was officially denied as a “Conspiracy Theory.”  It’s strange that the media and political leaders are trying to gaslight the population about this; it’s extensively documented. After Putin began to maneuver, for example, the US embassy official website immediately removed its documentation of Ukrainian bioweapons labs.  What do they have to hide?  Too bad we already archived them.

Second, the existence of these bioweapons labs is acknowledged, but whitewashed as no big deal: we are studying deadly pathogens but it’s for national security, you see. However, consider this:  if what they are doing is legal, why deny it at first? And why conduct this research in Ukraine?  Of all places?  Perhaps it’s the general lack of the rule of law? Because they can have complete control with no oversight or pushback?

Third, came the warnings that Putin’s bombing may “release dangerous pathogens” that weren’t supposed to exist and from bioweapons labs that were “conspiracy theories.”  Notably, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Victoria Nuland, after acknowledging the existence of "biological research facilities" in Ukraine, expressed concern that Russian forces may gain control of facilities and "research materials." Predictably, the media are trying to walk her comments back.

So, they lied to you.  Again.  Why do you lie to someone? Here’s an even better question:  why does the population continue to believe people who are lying to them? 

What else are we going to find in Ukraine?

Ukraine is:

    Where key DNC servers are stored; and one of the places that Dominion has operations;

    Where the Russian Collusion “theory” (can we call it a conspiracy theory now?) was born and where the famous “dossier” about Trump emerged;

    Where Hunter Biden (and Romney’s and Pelosi’s children) was paid millions for influence;

    Where the DeepState has major hubs for the grooming and trafficking of child sex slaves (who, in turn, are instruments of blackmail);

    Where the DeepState launders its money (I’m sure the $14B from Congress will be put to very good use. That was sarcasm.)

And think about it:

    What country donates the most to the utterly corrupt (and truly evil) Clinton Foundation?  Ukraine.

    Where does Soros have a great deal of property and it looks like a kind of staging/HQ for his operations?  Ukraine.

    Who effectively controls most of the media you see and hear via a complex network of boards, foundations, and funding?  Soros.

As one well-known Aussie protestor and political aspirant said:  the “Ukraine is the head of the snake, and once it comes down there is no Globalist empire anymore, it’s done…”

That is why they are so panicked.  That is why they are engineering the “outrage” that the population is being told to mirror.  That is why the narrative shifted so abruptly and seamlessly.
When they use the word “debunked” you know it’s panic time. Maybe it’s time to stop listening to them?


    Where the DeepState launders its money (I’m sure the $14B from Congress will be put to very good use. That was sarcasm.)

And think about it:

    What country donates the most to the utterly corrupt (and truly evil) Clinton Foundation?  Ukraine.

    Where does Soros have a great deal of property and it looks like a kind of staging/HQ for his operations?  Ukraine.

    Who effectively controls most of the media you see and hear via a complex network of boards, foundations, and funding?  Soros.

As one well-known Aussie protestor and political aspirant said:  the “Ukraine is the head of the snake, and once it comes down there is no Globalist empire anymore, it’s done…”

That is why they are so panicked.  That is why they are engineering the “outrage” that the population is being told to mirror.  That is why the narrative shifted so abruptly and seamlessly.
When they use the word “debunked” you know it’s panic time. Maybe it’s time to stop listening to them?

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x707.jpeg

Conclusion
The playbook is exactly the same as the “pandemic” psy-op

The media that created a mass formation psychosis—brainwashed billions for two years—about a fake “pandemic” are at it once again.  They didn’t suddenly decide to stop brainwashing; they just changed the subject.  As they’ve been doing for more than half a century.

Propaganda continues to flow from the media, political and corporate “elite” (heavy quotation marks); from Hollywood, actors, and from Ukrainian government to influence the west to create a no-fly zone, intervene etc.  The pattern is nearly identical:  the exact same people, the same general playbook:

    Take a core reality (a virus, Putin bombing);

    Groom the population to fear an “enemy” by magnifying that reality into something it isn’t (Deadly pandemic!  WWIII!) 

    Demonize and silence anyone who questions it.  Censorship about any other point of view other than “Ukraine good; Putin Bad!” is now fully deployed.

People who allowed their own freedoms to be trampled on for two years suddenly now care about freedom in a far away place? 

People who eventually came to see the pandemic for what it really is now suddenly believe the same media who convinced billions take useless poison on the basis of a conjured pandemic? How is it possible that they are falling for it again? Do they really believe the Pandemic psy-op was some kind of one-off exercise?

Don’t be fooled yet again.  Turn off the television and NPR. Put down the New Yorker & NYT. The flow of your moment-my-moment environment is more fabricated and scripted than you can now possibly imagine.

Be the sovereign person you were meant to be. In other words, don’t be this guy:

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...4x184.jpeg
Reply

#2
What is a Cult? What is Fascism?
Leveraging Groupthink in a hyper-networked world


The emerging New World Order—if they achieve it—is a vast system of global technocratic fascism, and on a scale beyond our wildest nightmares.

By the time it is in place, it will be too late to speak up; simply because “speaking up” will no longer be possible.

But if we were misled about the nature of fascism—and imagining it would come jackbooted and goose stepping into history again—how would we recognize it when it actually came?

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...5x263.jpeg

What is Fascism?

Fascism was and is indisputably the brainchild of the marxist Left (Antonio Gramsci and others around “Il Duce”), who proffered it in the 1930s as a “third way.”

Why did they call fascism the “third way”?  Because instead of Communism (total state ownership and control of the “means of production”) or free market capitalism (privately owned and controlled), Gramsci and others on the left envisioned a so-called “third way,” whereby enterprises remained ostensibly “private;” however, these would be publicly controlled.

Fascism never had—and really cannot have—anything essential to do with the political Right.  [Nota bene: Fascism is one of many deliberately misappropriated words that has caused untold confusion; I will be returning to this on my future series, “The Nature of Ideology.”]

The essence of Fascism captured in three principles

    First and foremost it means interlocking board membership between private companies and the State; achieved in part by rotating officials in and out of these public/private positions, including and especially board seats.  Sound familiar?  Does, say, the FDA come to mind?  Does this sound like the political Right?  Or the Left? 

    Second, this interlocking board membership makes possible very fine and immediate control over the private sphere, including the media, so that directives coming from the State can be implemented without a single law having to be passed.  Sound familiar?  Do the non-existent “vaccine mandates” come to mind?  Does that sound like the political Right, or the Left?

    And third, it subordinates the person to the group.  Look at the very symbol of Fascism:  it’s a bundle of sticks (fascis) bound together and unified for the purpose of making an axe handle.  In other words, the person (a single rod)—and his or her purpose and value—is subordinated to that of the group; and in nearly every way, the group is prior to the person. (And, moreover, the State itself is imbued with a fraudulent religiosity; and reified as a kind of ersatz deity.) Sound familiar?  Does that sound like the political Right?  Or the Left?   

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...30x332.png

Throughout WWII, Fascism was rapidly becoming the de facto mode of government in the west; in the US, for example, the mobilization of the nation for WWII meant the creation of an immense administrative state that—rather than seizing and controlling industries directly—worked through a complex of board membership to achieve proxy public control.  This was even touted at the time as the future and ideal model of all governance; and as it was staffed by “experts” from academia, it was celebrated in universities and taught to generations of students.

Share

That sprawling and complex administrative State—and the praxis of public control by proxy—became the permanent reality of post-WWII government in the US.  Which also meant erroneously and radically “reinterpreting” the Constitution in accordance with these changes.

We were already well on our way to their long-dreampt-of Fascist New World Order.

But the Left faced two obstacles to their New World Order

First, they had a public relations problem: if their entire ideology was and is essentially Fascist to the core, they needed to disassociate both their ideology and governance model from the leftist collectivist nightmares of WWII Europe.

In other words, Fascist collectivism—now squarely represented in the public’s mind by the former National Socialist Party (Nazi Party)—would have to be rebranded under a new name.

The second problem the Left had was that the political philosophy of the Right—a philosophy deeply and even stubbornly rooted in the culture of the west and especially in the US—was actuated by principles precisely the opposite of Fascism:

    a clear separation between the private and public sphere;

    a small and constitutionally-limited State operating under the rule of law, circumscribed by carefully enumerated powers, and sharing distributed powers via the principle of federalism; and,

    the priority of the person and his or her inalienable rights over that of the group.

And unfortunately for the marxist Left, many in the west, especially Americans, held fast to these principles.

Their solution to both problems was almost a black magic trick:  recast the now almost universally-deplored Nazism—the apotheosis of leftist collectivism—as politically “far Right”

The cultural marxists invented a preposterous schematic, which was soon taught  throughout the west, and has been ever since, as a bedrock of political science: rather than the political spectrum being a continuum with total state collectivism (“far Left)” at one end, and anarchic individualism (“far Right”) at the other end, somehow the far Right and far Left were now supposed to look similar—and almost merge, or even join in circular fashion—at their extremes.

And so the “far Right” was inexplicably dubbed “Fascist”—and thereby pejoratively  associated with the very Nazi associations the Left wished to eschew—as a kind of analogue to the “far Left’s” respective Communism.

But this fiction was and is absurd and arbitrary

This cultural marxist invention had no justification—historically, practically or theoretically, or in anything whatsoever:

    How does radical individualism “turn into”—what does that even mean?—radical collectivism?  Or vice versa?

    It defies basic logic.  It’s like saying black can become white and yet remain black.  But if individualism somehow “turns into collectivism,” then it’s no longer individualism, and not on the Right; it is now collectivism, or Leftism.  (Acculturation to such embedded contradictions is one of the basic modes of ideology, as I will be exploring in my future series.) 

    How can Nazism—the National Socialist Party—be characterized by anything but the apotheosis of collectivism?  That is, leftism?  (Conversely, try to name one essential thing about Nazism or Fascism that is uniquely & essentially connected with the political right.)       

However, that fiction enabled them to masquerade actual Fascism under the new label of “Progressivism”

If they were going to bring to fruition their centuries-long dream of global Fascism via the New World Order, the Left had usher in actual Fascism under another rubric: “Progressivism” (re-engineering language and words for their own purposes is a core cultural marxist tactic, and in evidence everywhere we look now:  what, after all, is a “woman”?)

The Left, from the academia to the popular media, worked assiduously throughout the 20th century to:

    Re-purpose the word Fascism from its essence (corporatism, very fine and detailed public control of the private sphere, and the priority of the group wrt the person, among other things) and focus it on certain incidental historical associations & images (goose stepping/jackboots, calls for racial purity, war-mongering, etc.), none of which have anything uniquely & essentially at all to do with Fascism;   

    Project these incidental historical associations & images onto the political Right; and connect this newly-deracinated “fascism” with the Right in the popular mind;

        Which explains why the Democratic Party (long the party of slavery, white supremacy, and the KKK) has continually hammered away at calling the GOP/right (the party of Lincoln, of Emancipation, and individuals before labels/race):  “white supremacist,” “racist,” etc.  Once again, the mode is projection.

        This also explains the infiltration of something traditionally alien to the GOP:  militarism, in the form of the Neo-Cons in the 1990s.

        And it also explains how the Democratic Party (the party that dragged the US into every single war in the 20th century (prior to Neo-Con Bush) has bizarrely cast itself as an anti-war party; and the traditionally peaceful and almost isolationist GOP as warmongers.

    And masquerade actual Fascism under the new label of “Progressivism” (ever notice how this vague term emerged seemingly out of the blue?  But “progressing” towards what, one wonders?)

Why do all this?  So the population wouldn’t recognize Fascism when it actually came. And really, who wouldn’t welcome something called “Progressivism”? 

Under the guise of Progressivism, and with the power of the media under their full control, the Left was now free to mobilize nations and even the world towards global Fascism, right out in the open, via the ever-growing administrative states and transnational entities; and to inculcate cultural marxism (including radical feminism, transgenderism, normalizing pedophilia, etc.) in citizens worldwide through media/Hollywood.

Indeed, if you could leverage groupthink on a mass scale—say, by conjuring a pandemic out of thin air—you might even be able to get the population to demand Fascism, if even unwittingly, on a global scale.
Groupthink dynamics:  one of the most powerful forces on earth

Let’s focus on three key psychological studies demonstrating the incalculable power of groupthink.

1.  The Asch Conformity Experiments:  the power of groupthink dynamics

In these experiments designed in the 1950s, subjects invariably denied what they knew to be true and could plainly see right in front of them with their very own eyes (“that is obviously X”); and, instead, conformed to the groupthink of what the control subjects (essentially actors) said they could see (“that is y.”)

If you aren’t familiar with these experiments, please watch this short video introduction::

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA

2.  The Elevator Experiments:  how “group behavior powerfully influences individual judgements”

https://youtu.be/3vAKfdan0ao

Many similar experiments evolved out of the initial Asch experiments, including the infamous “Elevator Experiments.”

Imagine you’re in an elevator and everyone is facing the same direction; however, it’s the wrong direction because the doors open up behind you.  How hard would it be for you to turn around?  Turns out it’s very hard for most people.

(That is what Anons are doing, in a sense:  facing the other way, against the impressive power of groupthink and the State/media. Btw, in this piece I am using the term “Anons” to refer, somewhat loosely, to virtually anyone fighting or even resisting the media-driven narratives; and “Normies” to refer to those in conformity with them.)

The experiment demonstrated that almost no one will turn against the other people in an elevator; and the studies concluded, more generally, that “group behavior powerfully shapes individual judgements.” 

3.  The Milgram “Obedience” Experiments:  how an “expert” in a white lab coat can get a person to “torture” and even “kill” someone else simply on the authority of his “say so.”

These notorious experiments were and are extremely disturbing. If you want to read about them and watch the clips, start here.   

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment

Or, you can simply watch the evening news:

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...x2871.jpeg

There are few more powerful forces on earth than groupthink

We are in the midst of a global mass psychosis, made possible by many decades of the Left grooming the population—via media, Hollywood, etc—to mirror the minutely-controlled groupthink narratives. When activated on a mass scale, it can get an entire population to do unspeakable things to themselves and others.

And this “Mass Formation Psychosis”—as University of Ghent Psychologist, Dr. Mattias Desmet, is now calling it, and what others call the “trance,” what I call “the spell"—is now taking over the whole world.

The words of Dr. Robert Malone about this emerging psychosis are oddly comforting, if only because it reminds all of us that we are not alone: 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/kBmlEKAHAZ3R/

In my recent piece, I called the current world a “vast virtue-signaling hive.”  Which is another way of saying, a cult.

A cult?  Seriously Monsieur?  That sounds a wee bit crazy, dude.   
What are the three primary signs of a cult?

What constitutes a cult—and how to identify one—is a complex and somewhat nebulous topic.  For our present purposes, however, we can identify three primary and unmistakable signs, each of which is deeply illustrative of our current world.

1.  Members are isolated from “unapproved” information/viewpoints; and from those who bear them.

This is why Anons have been censored, silenced and completely removed from the national and worldwide conversation, including being deplatformed from Twitter, Facebook and elsewhere.

It is also why media/Soros have assembled an army of “fact-checkers” who, unbeknownst to the public, simply label viewpoints and information that go against the narrative as (erroneously and usually with shockingly superficial talking points) “debunked” - or, without any information or talking points at all, they simply label it “conspiracy theory.” 

(Bizarrely, among normies, this kind of labeling is an supremely unanswerable and irrefutable argument.)

And, among so many other things, this is also why the FBI and the media and social medial platforms such as Twitter, among others, have started to label dissenters from approved opinions “as domestic terrorists.”  Bringing the full weight and power of the State to bear upon a single person for an unapproved opinion is a chilling and dangerous precedent.  One that, for some reason, doesn’t seem to faze normies.

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x120.jpeg

2.  Members are encouraged to virtue-signal their agreement with the group narratives, as well as  disdain for the “forbidden” viewpoints.

The media, Hollywood, entertainment/sports, corporate and educational institutions have been grooming the population for decades by encouraging and rewarding people to virtue signal their identification with the groupthink narrative; and, conversely, to virtue-signal their disdain with what has not been approved. 

The corporate environment has also transformed. Employees at every level are encouraged to mirror the approved narratives and virtue-signal their agreement; indeed, not doing so can get you fired.  Employees are routinely given “courses”and tested on whether they conform; for example, I have a friend who was made to affirm that the phrase “all lives matter” is racist — and the question kept occurring until she answered it “correctly.”   

Our hyper-networked world and the existence of devices/software keep people saturated in the media environment nearly 24/7.  Social media platforms—all originally DARPA projects—are essentially massive hives to orchestrate and magnify groupthink and virtue-signaling for billions.

The key thing to understand about all of these networks is that they asymmetric; a very few number of people orchestrate the flow of content at all levels.  And for billions of people around the globe; and at every moment.  Think about what that means.   

The modern world has been transformed into a vast virtue-signaling “hive.”

3.  Members are not allowed to question anything essential or fundamental to the group; doing so will be met with expulsion of some kind.

It’s exceedingly hard to turn around against the group-think, and against the vast virtue-signaling hive our world has become.  Don't believe me?  Try it.

Try going on a “news” show or to a dinner party or cocktail party, and simply question global warming, or BLM, or transgenderism, or masks, or vaccines, or the pandemic, or the 2020 election, etc.

You will be labeled pejoratively—again, their unanswerable and irrefutable “argument”—and promptly and summarily shunned without rational discussion.
What is projection?  What is mirroring?

Now, notice how none of these “primary signs” apply even remotely to Anons; or, people who are resisting and even fighting against the media-driven narratives?

And yet, ironically, we’ve been labelled a cult.

Which is more than a bit bizarre.  We’re about as far from a cult as one could get.     

    No one tells us what to think, or what is approved, or what we cannot question.

    We are not seeking the approval of anyone.

    We honor the truth wherever it is found.

    We are—all of us—patriots who are putting our lives on hold and on the line to fight for our world, our lives, and the people who have been gaslighted into harming themselves and others. 

    Our movement is based in love; in loyalty to the people we love and to our nations and to the world as a whole; and to love of truth above all.

If this doesn’t match what the mainstream media says about us, this is hardly our fault.     

See how this works?  It’s a mirroring technique on a vast scale

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x403.jpeg

(Incidentally, I’m assuming most of my readers know there is no such thing as “Qanon”; ironically, it’s an invention of the media cult.  One continually searches in vain for a suitable intensifier for the word “irony.”)

It’s the oldest trick in public relations warfare:  accuse your opponent of being what you are; or of doing precisely what you’re doing, even at that very moment.  It’s very confusing and deeply disorienting, particularly to the unwary public.  We have all experienced this at a personal level as well: someone accuses you of doing precisely what they are doing at that very moment.

Similarly, the media groomed the public to believe that Anons are fascists; and yet, right out in the open, right in front of the entire world, the media, political and corporate “elite” (heavy quotation marks) are the ones orchestrating fascism on a global scale never before even dreamt of.

But the mirroring technique is blinding everyone to it (if the fascists are those “Qanon” weirdoes over there, you won’t see us constructing worldwide fascism over here.)

Indeed, whoever named the fascist paramilitary arm of the Democratic party ANTIFA (“anti-fascists”)—modeled after the Brownshirts in the 1930s—understood deeply the power of mirroring and projection.  (How could they be “fascist” if their name is “anti-fascist”?  This is how dumbed down we’ve become.)

One might even dub it a “diabolical mirroring ploy.”  Why diabolical?  Because it is so deeply disorienting that one can start to doubt ones senses and even one’s mind.

One might even say it’s a gaslighting [link] tactic.  And what do cults do but gaslight their members?  And constantly?  And sometimes to death?
Gaslighting the World to Death

Most people are familiar with the harrowing passage in Orwell’s 1984, “how many fingers am I holding up Winston?”  From the 1984 film version: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6Ybkd_beUU

Don’t believe your lying eyes.  Believe what we tell you to believe.  Because why?  Often because—their supremely unanswerable and irrefutable argument goes—because SCIENCE™®, of course.

Most Anons are all-too aware of the constant gaslighting by the media and political “elites.”  So much so that I know at times it seems we’re bordering on losing our minds.

And we all have our lists of examples of gaslighting.  From gaslighting the population about transgenderism to climate change; from PCR-driven psy-op pandemics to the normalization of pedophilia; from masks to illegal lockdowns; from demonizing Kyle Rittenhouse, to white washing the Waukesha Christmas Parade case and the Jussie Smollett Case. 

And so on, against actual science, against common sense, against reason, against history.

Gaslighting at the Trey Von Martin level all over again in a seemingly endless stream of unreality.

Allow me to ply my own favorite examples.  Okay, allow me three: 

I.  Gaslighting:  “vaccines are safe and effective; and if you don’t take them you’re anti-science!”

You’re “following science” if you allow yourself to be injected with an un-trialed (fact) yet experimental (fact) technology that will—via gene therapy—permanently and irrevocably alter (fact) the immune systems (among the most complex material reality in the universe, along with the cerebral cortex and the human genome, none of which we understand more than superficially) of nearly half the entire earth’s population (fact)—even though these “vaccines” can and do cause irrevocable harm to high percentages of people (fact)—but now, we should all take them because it may prevent our dying (baseless conjecture) from something that has over a 99% survival rate (fact)?

But if you refuse them you’re, among other labels, “anti-science.”  Really?  “Yes,” says the man in the white lab coat, “take your kool-aid!”   

II.  Gaslighting about Trump v. Obama & “Bidan”

One could write volumes on this; but, briefly:

President Trump

    The population was gaslighted constantly for four years that Trump was going cause WWIII.

    Yet:  Trump pulled the US military out of nearly every country and conflict; he even visited and established a new relationship with N. Korea, and even crossed the DMZ line, which no President has ever done; and for four years we saw what never in my life I imagined I’d see:  what peace and prosperity and national pride looked like.  The word unprecedented comes to mind.  Easily “Nobel Peace Prize” worthy.

    But the only thing Normies can remember was his alleged demeanor and “mean tweets.”

Obama

    The population was gaslighted for 8 years about how in Obama we finally had a sophisticated world citizen who would usher in world peace.  He was praised constantly for virtually no accomplishments.

    Yet:  Obama, among so much else, weaponized the US Government, including the IRS, against the American people.  And he dropped at least 100,000 bombs on 7 different countries, killing countless innocent civilians, including children.  Even during funerals and weddings.  (Remember how the entire world’s population was welded into a frenzy against him?  I don’t.  Instead, the world praised Barack Obama and awarded him the Nobel Peace Prize.)

    But all Normies remember is his well-creased “slacks” and his studied demeanor. 

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...61x399.png

“Bidan” - this crime family has done virtually everything the media gaslighted the population about Trump’s family

Let’s just take Afghanistan:  “Bidan” first pulled out the military (and not civilians/personnel); and thereby abandoned Americans and collaborators/translators in the thousands (and weirdly, flew (mostly adult male) Afghan  belligerents into the US,  and gave them housing and did not require them to receive vaccinations.)  And to top it all off, they left $80 BILLION —yes, that’s with a B— worth of top secret military equipment (worth roughly 6 aircraft carriers.)

And then, “Bidan” drone killed a non-belligerent Afghan family.

And then—after all that—he bizarrely declared this operation “a success”?

“Bidan” has fomented chaos around the world; he has caused confusion every time he has spoken; and he publicly—in an unprecedented act of war—called for “regime change” wrt Putin.

But, please, let us not forget Trump’s allegedly “mean”tweets.  That’s the important thing to remember.  Obviously.   

III.  Gaslighting the world about protests on the left v. on the right

Gaslighting about Jan6:  “This was an unprecedented attack on our Democracy by “Qanon” white supremacists.”

Truth:

    A bunch of people in maga hats were invited by the capitol police to walk through the Capitol building.  That was it. 

    There were no “white supremacists.”  The only connection between “white supremacists”/“domestic terrorists” and Anons is the one that is constantly being conjured by the media.

    The rest of it was a classic false flag from start to finish; FBI actors (almost stagey in their depiction of “white supremacists”) infiltrated the “maga” crowds and created an illusion for the world that this was a violent uprising of “white supremacists”; and the media magnified this illusion for the public’s consumption.

Conversely, when it came to violent cultural marxist/far left protests—mostly paramilitary units (BLM/antifa), organized and funded by Soros—the media gaslighted the world about them in a positive way:

    Gaslighting about Democrats violently occupying the Capitol Building in Madison, Wisconsin in  2011:  “This is what democracy looks like." When tens of thousands of Democrats surged on the Wisconsin Capitol building in Madison and physically occupied it for more than two weeks.

    Gaslighting about the BLM/ANTIFA deadly riots  2016:  “To assign the actions of one person to an entire movement is dangerous and irresponsible." When hundreds of BLM/ANTIFA blocked interstate highways and violently accosted police (even killing several.)

    Gaslighting about the Kavanaugh riots in 2018: “It's understandable." When during the Kavanaugh hearings, mobs of Democrats stormed the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, DC, and in rage pounded their fists upon the door.

    Gaslighting about the 2020 Summer Riots:  "These are mostly peaceful protests." When in major cities across the country, mobs of Democrats marched in the streets, set buildings on fire, looted businesses, assaulted and even killed bystanders and police.

    Gaslighting about the 2020 Summer Riots in Seattle:  "It's a block party atmosphere.” When Democrats seized several blocks of the Capitol Hill neighborhood in downtown Seattle, declaring it an autonomous zone?  Remember the guns?  The deaths?  The looting and destruction of private property?  The demonizing of people who tried to protect their property?   

    Gaslighting about the Democrat/leftist mob attacks on Republicans in 2021:  “No justice, no peace.” When a crazed mob gathered after the Republican National Convention and attacked Rand Paul, a sitting U.S. Senator.

    Gaslighting about the Democrat riots throughout 2021:  "This is the only way oppressed people can be heard." When police were told to stand down, governors refused to call in the national guard, and Soros operatives paid bail for violent protesters who were arrested.

Do Normies even remember any of that?  Or have they been trained to forget anything that happened more than five minutes ago?  Can the difference between how this was presented to the population and how Jan6 was presented be any less discrepant?

When the same patterns happen over and over again, it’s not confusion; it’s not ignorance; it’s not “different points of view.”  It’s systematic and deliberate gaslighting.

It’s not even remotely arguable otherwise at this point, if it ever was.

Gaslighting the public into fear about Covid.  Look at these terrifying numbers. 

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...8x399.jpeg

We could multiply examples of this ad infinitum; I’m sure my readers could too.  At this point, if we were to lay them all out they would stretch to the moon and back.   

As I discussed in my previous piece, this is what Color Revolutions do: they fatigue, confuse and wear down the population with this sort of thing.

But a large part of the population sadly doesn’t seem to notice what is happening.
The population is becoming impervious to reason & evidence

Over the years, I have received a veritable cataract of emails from people who disagree with my pieces.  And the pattern is almost invariably the same, with most of these readers:

    confusing passion with evidence;

    confusing invective with understanding; and

    confusing labeling with actually marshaling an argument.

Labeling as a substitute for argument

Then again, if you have come to believe (because you have been entrained to believe) that you can summarily and unanswerably refute a position merely by labeling someone with any number of epithets—however bizarrely non-sequitur they may be—then why to go to the trouble of actually marshaling an argument?  Why go to the trouble of understanding what it is someone is actually saying?  Why not simply caricature the opposing argument?   

Oppose Black Lives Matter?  Believe borders matter?  Don’t like Obama or his policies?  You’re a racist.  Believe in personal sovereignty?  And national over transnational sovereignty?  You’re a white supremacist.  Oppose transgenderism?  You’re a hateful anti-science bigot.  Don’t want to take a dangerous and experimental mRNA gene therapy injection?  You’re a stupid anti-vaxxer who is a threat to society.  Believe anything other than what the media is proffering?  You’re a “conspiracy theorist.”

This is the cult in operation:  by encouraging the substitution of labels for argument, this isolates members from reason and evidence—and even from reality itself—and on anything that might cast doubt on what the cult believes.   

But it gets worse…

How can you refute an argument you haven’t understood?

An example culled from emails I’ve received recently in response to my previous piece; more or less:  “I hate Putin; he is evil and therefore you are wrong“ - which isn’t, of course, by itself an argument for or against anything. 

Nevertheless, even if I were to concede that Putin is "evil”—or murderous, hateful, etc—this doesn't disturb the argument in my first Substack piece whatsoever.

And if these readers had actually gone to the trouble of understanding my argument in the first place, they would have known that.  But labeling and caricature are so much easier, no?

The last thing the cult wants is for its members to understand—and therefore be vulnerable to—opposing points of view.

If you don’t understand your opponent’s argument, you cannot even understand your own

I once had a Philosophy professor who divided up our class into pro-lifers and pro-choicers so that we might debate.  And, wisely, he asked the pro-lifers had to make the pro-choice argument; and the pro-choicers had to make the pro-life argument.

Here’s what happened:  the pro-lifers made far better arguments than even the pro-choicers were able to make regarding their own real pro-choice positions; and the pro-choicers absolutely floundered at trying to make the pro-life arguments.  All they could do is hypothesize absurd caricatures of the pro-life positions.

What was the moral of the exercise?  You do not even know your own argument until you know that which you are attempting to refute.  And the best disputants know the opposing arguments even better than their expositors.

The truth is, the population has been groomed into believing they don’t need to understand what they oppose; which effectively means that they don’t even understand their own positions.

This is what cults do:  sow confusion and chaos in the person so that they no longer understand even themselves, and why/what they believe to be true.

Contradictions in the heart of their positions are signs of impaired intellects

“It’s so great to have our first black Supreme Court Justice.”  But we already have one, no?  “Yes, but this one will defend women’s rights.”

(I didn’t know that was a function of a Supreme Court Justice?  By the way, what does it even mean to “defend women’s rights”?  “You must be a racist bigot.”)

Even so, if she doesn’t know and cannot say what a “woman” is, how can she possibly, as you say, “defend” their “rights”?

**Crickets.**

(And btw, if we don’t know what a “woman” is, how do we know she is our first black woman SC justice?)

This is what cults do:  impair reason.

When reason and evidence no longer matter, persuasion is replaced by force:  “We shouted them down!”

I have a lovely niece who attended the Youth International UN Assembly a few years ago; and afterwards, she announced proudly that:

    “the conservatives came with all these facts and arguments and stuff - but, don’t worry, we shouted them down!”

She was beaming; evidently this kind of thing had been not only condoned but actively encouraged in her milieu.  Indeed, this sort of moral vanity seems the rule now.

                                                                        *****

But what happens when words and reason and evidence are abandoned?  If you can use force to silence people, why even bother with labels?  What happens when “shouting” people “down” no longer works?

The population is becoming impervious to reason & evidence because that is what cults do to their members over time.

And so—as the mass formation psychosis deepens—they are increasingly cut off from reality.

Which means they also come to believe in absurdities:  in pandemics that don’t exist, transgenderism, that pedophilia is a normal expression of human sexuality, et cetera.

Voltaire’s famous words come to mind:  “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...09x462.png

This is a man pretending to be a woman; he even struts around the woman’s locker room naked. The real winner, an actual woman, dared to complain on Twitter. So she was banned. See a pattern yet?
“Conspiracies like this are not possible”

“Conspiracies like this can’t happen.  People would speak up.  People aren’t this evil.”

On the face of it, of course, these objections and responses to my above thesis sound reasonable.

They’re also exactly how normies have been trained to respond, almost reflexively, to anything that is outside the media-approved narratives.

Just as the terms “fully vaccinated” or “anti-vaxxer” were deliberately mainstreamed, the phrase“conspiracy theory” was mainstreamed in the mid-20th century for a very specific purpose:  to train people to dismiss anything not approved by the media merely by labeling it so. 

Furthermore, it is worth nothing how many “conspiracy theories”—even during the past year or so—have became undeniable conspiracy facts:  a prime example are vaccine passports. Or, that the mRNA “vaccines” are gene therapy. Or, even the New World Order itself. One could multiply even just recent examples into the hundreds.

At the same time, these sorts of objections seem rather odd to me:  whether one thinks conspiracies like this are possible has no bearing whatsoever on whether all this is, in fact, actually happening. 

It is a fact that billions of people were gaslighted into obeying a very small minority of people, and to do things that were utterly against their own interest, and which caused irreparably harmful to themselves and their loved ones.  (A chilling memory:  mothers filming their child’s “vaccination” for TikTok (or some other platform) to show the world how right-thinking they are.  We’re supposed to be protecting children not using them as props for our own vanity.)

It’s not only possible, it is happening right in front of our eyes.  The question really isn’t whether but how all of this is possible.
“But people would speak up.”  Who, exactly?

Think of all this as occurring at three levels:
Level 1: those who are part of the cult 

Most people have been groomed for the “hive mind” from an early age; and are simply unwitting members of the cult.  Why would cult members “speak up”?  What would they “speak up” about?

Consider the three experiments I cited at the the beginning of this piece; how powerfully group dynamics affect individual decisions and perceptions; how difficult it is to turn around in a elevator, even if you know you’re facing the wrong way; and how persuasive authority figures in lab coats can be.

The truth is, most people just go with the flow of what is around them.  And that is, in part, “how” this is happening in a nutshell.

How about your own doctor?  How about that person you know in the media?  How about that virus expert you know?  Almost certainly a part of the Hive Mind.  Even many high up the CDC, the WHO and other such places are likely to be part of this Groupthink-based Hive Mind.

“But people would talk”

Why?  What would they say?

The university teacher who grooms her students for cultural marxism isn’t doing so as part of some sinister plan; she believes she is “educating” her students.

The same is true with most journalists, media figures entertainers/Hollywood actors, etc:  most of them have been groomed themselves to conform to the “Hive Mind.”

“Even my doctor, really?”

Most (certainly not all) doctors mindlessly administer protocols.  And I mean even “top-tier” doctors at the “finest” hospitals in the US.  Thinking for themselves did not get them into grad school, it didn’t enable them to graduate, or get their various positions and so on.  Regurgitating from memory and following pre-set protocols did. Conforming to Groupthink did.

Some are simply too afraid to “speak up”

Anyone who actually understands what is happening faces a difficult choice.  I suppose some people are simply cowards.  But many of them, I suspect, simply cannot risk their lives and fortunes.  And, they indeed have much to be afraid of, as the consequences are severe:  professionally, personally and financially.  Everything is at risk when you speak up against the cult.

Fauci and funding:  a vast system of rewards and punishment

Fauci controls billions in funding for medical schools/research.  Do you think that funding is unconditional?  If you propose a research study that goes against the AIDs or the pandemic narratives, your chances of getting funded are less than nil.  And conversely, if you conform to the narratives, you are rewarded with funding, with positions, and with general advancement.  This happens throughout the system; if you don’t believe me go to grad school and try to get funding for a project that questions global warming.

And billions of Federal—that is, taxpayer—disbursements are made to schools to enforce “pandemic” measures:  masking, and so on.  And hospitals are “rewarded” handsomely for every “covid” diagnosis, every ventilator “treatment,” and every covid “death.”  What are incentives?  What school or hospital will turn down money?  How easy is it to put “Covid” as a (vaguely) “contributory” cause of death on a death certificate?  How does that affect the covid death-rate numbers?   

“But hold on, I am not part of a cult, Monsieur!”

No a single cult member has ever, in the history of the world, actually believed themselves to be part of a cult.  That’s how it works.

But let’s test you:  if you believe there is a deadly pandemic, why? How exactly did you come to this conclusion?  What evidence have you seen?  Why on earth would you take the “vaccines” then?  Have you seen evidence of their efficacy and safety?  You cannot have; and no one else has either.

Indeed, we warned you over and over.  But sadly, it’s been very, very hard to get through to you.  That is what happens in a cult:  you become unreachable by reason and evidence.   
Level 2:  those who are silenced

Those who do speak up—doctors, experts, virologists, journalists, scientists— are silenced.  So Normies don’t hear them.

It’s easy to create the illusion that “most” doctors and researchers believe in the pandemic and vaccines if you silence dissenting researchers and doctors.

Here are two examples among thousands.

Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winning inventor of the PCR

Kary Mullis insisted over and over again for 25 years that his technology cannot—even in principle—be used to detect viral infection.  Mullis was Dr. Anthony Fauci’s bête noire in this story that goes way back beyond Covid-19.  Mullis was arguing against using the PCR to diagnose HIV infection; and, he argued:  the more tests, the more “infections.”  Thus creating an epidemic out of thin air.  Sound familiar?   

But Mullis, who surely knew more about the PCR than anyone else on earth, was labeled a nutjob, and so his warnings were not only ignored but ridiculed.

And, of course, as you may know, Mullis conveniently “died” just months before the “pandemic,” for which the PCR was used as an indispensable linchpin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IifgAvXU3ts

Dr. Robert Malone, one of the inventors of the mRNA technology

Dr. Malone is now speaking out against the widespread use of mRNA “vaccines.”  This man has everything to lose and nothing to gain by doing so.

However, he’s been subtly and pejoratively labeled into persona non grata status; his level of involvement in the development of the technology has been “questioned” (a public relations smear technique); and his image has been “managed” by the media so that Normies won’t take him too seriously (see here.) Though, really, they should:

Click here to listen Dr. Robert Malone: The “vaccines” are causing a form of AIDs

https://www.bitchute.com/video/LCK4kuu6iGwb/

This man had every reason not to speak up.

Of course, silencing, disparaging, or especially firing anyone who has the courage to “speak up” also serves as a warning to anyone else who is tempted to step “out of line.”  Thereby, reinforcing membership in level 1.
Level 3:  Those running the cult

Then there’s the 1% of 1% who shape and orchestrate the “hive mind.”  Why would Jim Jones “speak up” about his own cult?

[This is an immense and enormously complex topic; and mostly reserved for a future piece; I will touch on a few points, even if a bit cryptically for now.]

These people are very few and mostly out of public view; they form a kind of a “religion” that binds them together to work towards a common end; and this “religion” also binds them to silence.  They communicate out in the open, among themselves and even directly to the mostly uncomprehending public, but in a “language” that the general population does not yet see.  But once you see it,  you cannot “unsee” it. 

Monarch Mind Control.  Mk-Ultra.  And Blackmail.

The 1% of 1%, however, need “controlled” people in politics, in the media, in Hollywood to do their bidding.  This is achieved through very well documented programs that go back to the early 20th century, including CIA Monarch Mind Control & Mk-Ultra; and/or arranging for people to put themselves into compromising positions (often, sadly, with children) in order to allow them into the club, and thereby be blackmail-able and controllable.

You cannot be in the club—and attain these positions—unless you are subject to one of these controls, often multiple.  Many are groomed from a very young age for this. Almost like a lifelong hazing process.   

How do we know this?

Because hundreds of former members and witnesses have risked their lives to tell their stories about this; and often end up dead.  And because it’s right in front of us.

How do you hide something?  Put it right out in the open.  Once you see it, you cannot unsee it.

Every magazine cover, every day, every major celebrity; every major media personality; every major sports star….

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...x1178.jpeg

I mean all of them…

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...6x283.jpeg

Yep, he was a high ranking freemason

Their “all-seeing” eye message

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...8x815.jpeg

Just a normal girl, you see?

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x540.jpeg

“Okay, but no one is this evil”

Really? It is practically a law of human nature:  wherever there is even a modicum of power to be had, even at a lowly food Co-op, there are people seeking it; and wherever there is the potential for immense power, there are people willing to do virtually anything to get it.  And the more ruthless they are, the more morally unhinged, the more likely they are to obtain it.

Which is why Psychopaths are believed to account for 20% of corporate and media leadership worldwide.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopath...sychopaths

If that is true with corporations and the media, it’s doubtlessly also true for politics; as  Friedrich von Hayek, Nobel prize winning economist, said:  “In government, the scum rises to the top.”

The world is run by psychopaths whose every action is to enhance their god-like feeling of power and control over other people. And the more concentrated and extensive the power, the higher percentage of psychopaths.

Such a person is not necessarily evil; but their actions and effects can be.

Psychopaths aren’t stupid though:  they know how to sound superficially caring

The psychopaths in public view—Gates (son of the founders of Planned Parenthood, another genocidal project; more about that later), Fauci, Schwab—all posture themselves, like all megalomaniacs, as benefactors of “humanity” and of the earth/environment broadly.

At the same time, they have spent their entire adult lives thinking and talking about not only population “control” (a euphemism if ever there were one) but population reduction.  (Not the sort of people to take public health advice from, btw.)  This is part how they believe they are being “stewards” of the earth/environment.

This very small minority see the population as livestock to be thinned out; they are often frankly genocidal in their language, and speak this way right out in the open.  They have to do this (more about that later too); but they “speak” in such a way so that you cannot hear or understand what they’re saying unless you are free from the media entrainment. If you are, it’s as loud and clear as can be. More about this later too.

Is it such a stretch, as we learn about the nature of these “vaccines,” to consider the possibility that they are are slow-motion bioweapons?  That slow-motion genocide is the goal of the NWO “elite”? 

Of course, pure evil cannot exist, metaphysically speaking.  But we’re about to see a pretty close approximation of what it might look like if it did.  Stay tuned.

                                                                            *****

So, who else would “speak up”? Anons, of course. And slowly, the world is waking up from the spell.

Conclusion:  ”Für Ihre Sicherheit" (“for your safety.”) 

The emerging New World Order—if they achieve it—is a vast system of global technocratic fascism, and on a scale beyond our wildest nightmares.

They are trying to use a permanent state of emergency to usher in the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Great Reset: digital identity, vaccine passports, Universal Basic Income (UBI), Schwab’s“you will own nothing and be happy,” and Chinese-style Social Credit Scores.  Out of fear, citizens are surrendering their sovereignty to the WEF and other Supranational organizations.

By the time it is in place, it will be too late to speak up simply because speaking up will no longer be possible.  It is barely possible even now.  But few notice this until they try.

If we were misled about the nature of fascism—and imagining it would come jackbooted and goose stepping into history again—how would we recognize it when it came?

What if it arrived this time masquerading as kindness?  For the essential thing was always that all measures were:”Für Ihre Sicherheit" (“For your safety.”)

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x505.jpeg

Gesundheitspaß (Nazi “health pass”)

We are in the midst of a global mass psychosis taking over the world, made possible by many decades of the Left grooming the population—via media, Hollywood, etc—to mirror the minutely-controlled groupthink narratives.

It’s rather like a spell or a trance.  It is exceedingly difficult to penetrate.  Why?  Because cults render people impervious to reason and evidence.

The key is to break the spell of the media.  Breaking this spell, however, is exceedingly difficult.  It’s so all-encompassing and so pervasive it’s hard for most people to see.

And how can you escape a captivity you cannot see?

David

One of the great conjuring tricks the media has pulled off is persuading Anons to believe we are fewer than we are.  But we are millions around the globe and growing daily.  When we realize this, we will be unstoppable.  As I shall argue in my next piece:  it may not always look it, but we are winning, and we will prevail.

Stay tuned for my next piece, a sneak peak: “The World is about to Change”

See my first piece, “Engineering Selective Outrage about Ukraine,” via the link at the bottom of this page.

P.P.S: All my life I’ve heard people ask: “how could that have happened?” Well, now we know….

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...0x480.jpeg

The World is About To Change
How the world will look post-Ukrainian Conflict


If Russia's reserves can be seized by the NWO, how are they "reserves"?

Remember when Putin/Russia was punished in 2014 by being banned from the SWIFT system? This isn’t possible anymore because the BRICS countries created their own global payment system.

And BRICS account for 40% of the world's trade. Not coincidentally, these are also the countries that have very large gold reserves. That is, REAL reserves.

This is the kernel of my next piece, where I explore how fiat currency is their lifeblood; how Ukraine (the “keystone”) is their staging ground; how Hunter's laptop is the master key connecting it all; and how the worldwide Q Operation is slowly coming to fruition.

We are winning. And the world is about to change. What we have been watching for the past few years is a kind of “show” replete with actors and a script. (“Bidan,” for example, is merely a bad actor playing a bit part.) We are approaching (what has long been called) “The Precipice”: some event that will look quite scary and finally wake up much of the population.

Our answer to the NWO is personal sovereignty, our answer to fascism is Constitutional government, and our answer to fiat currency is un-hypothecated gold.

And most importantly, God is our refuge from their Satanic ploys and plans.

Stay tuned.

David

https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1...89x960.png
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Technocratic Global Death Cult Agenda To Cull The Human Population Hissil 0 272 11-18-2023, 11:51 AM
Last Post: Hissil

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.