https://standfirst-thecriticmag-producti...5249-1.jpg

Face masks make you stupid

Why face masks are a form of dehumanisation
Artillery Row

By
Patrick Fagan
28 July, 2020

In Joost Meerloo’s analysis of false confessions and totalitarian regimes, The Rape of the Mind, he coins a phrase for the ‘dumbing down’ of critical resistance – menticide. “In the totalitarian regime,” he wrote, “the doubting, inquisitive, and imaginative mind has to be suppressed. The totalitarian slave is only allowed to memorise, to salivate when the bell rings.”

    Face masks make you suggestible; they make you more likely to follow someone else’s direction and do things you wouldn’t otherwise do

Neolithic man had a similar problem dealing with his livestock. Homo sapiens’ success has relied not insignificantly on cattle – their dairy, meat, leather and manure. Yet the cow’s ancestor, the auroch, was quite a different beast. It was fast, aggressive and dangerous – hardly conducive to be corralled into predictable channels of behaviour. So, about 10,500 years ago, man started to deliberately breed the most docile aurochs for domestication.

The key word here is docile, which comes from the Latin docere, meaning “to teach” (as does, say, ‘doctorate’ and ‘document’). Being docile means being compliant and following commands, which means submitting to a system of thought.

Whereas animals, however, typically need to be bred to have a higher level of reasoning to be taught commands, human beings, already being quite smart, need to be dumbed down. You won’t disobey an order if you lack the cognitive ability to question it. This is particularly pertinent to the smooth running of a modern world system which relies on millions of individual souls, each with their own nuanced life history and perspective, thinking and acting in the same way.

The empirical literature has shown that compliance and suggestibility are negatively related to intelligence (e.g., Gudjonsson, 1991). In consumer psychology, there is even a technique called ‘disrupt-then-reframe’: bamboozle people first and they’ll be more likely to buy what you’re selling (Davis & Knowles, 1999). Ultimately, the common denominator for increasing suggestibility is switching off executive function in the prefrontal cortex – disabling the superego, the conscience, the internal monologue. Without Jiminy Cricket on his shoulder, Pinocchio would never have become a real boy – he would have always remained a puppet. Modern society is shot through with things that make us similarly dumb (literally, unable to speak).

The effect of television, for example, as Meerloo wrote, is to “catch the mind directly, giving people no time for calm, dialectical conversation with their own minds.” The mind-numbing, irrational effect of visual communication has been recognised throughout history. Not for nothing did religions talk about the word of God and forbid graven images. Unsurprisingly, empirical studies showing that watching television makes you stupid in both the short- and long-term (Hoang et al., 2016; Lillard & Peterson, 2011). This is to say nothing of pornography, which is now consumed by 98% of men but known to inhibit the part of the brain dealing with conscience and consciousness, the prefrontal cortex (Kuhn & Gallinat, 2014).

Moving from circuses to bread, alcohol, of course, reduces cognitive function in the short-term (Hindmarch & Sherwood, 1991). Even at moderate levels of consumption, it accelerates cognitive decline in older age (Topiwala et al., 2017). Junk food, likewise, makes it harder to think in the short-term (Barnes & Joyner, 2012) and harms cognitive ability in the long-term (Reichelt & Rank, 2017).

Fluoride has become something of a cliché of conspiracy theorists; being added to the public water supply in multiple countries around the world, ostensibly to reduce tooth decay. However, the evidence supporting the dental benefits of fluoridated water is poor, while many studies have shown it can damage tooth aesthetics via fluorosis (McDonagh et al., 2000). Many more studies have found that fluoridated water lowers the population’s intelligence (e.g., Borman & Fyfe, 2013; Green et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2000; Rocha-Amador et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2008).

Which brings us to face masks.

Face masks can now be added to the list of mandates that make you stupid. As if Piers Morgan feverishly promoting them weren’t evidence enough, here are the facts on why you absolutely, categorically should not wear a face mask. They make you suggestible; they make you more likely to follow someone else’s direction and do things you wouldn’t otherwise do. In short, they switch off your executive function – your conscience.

A great example comes from a study by Mathes and Guest (1976), who asked participants how willing they would be, and how much they would have to be paid, to carry a sign around the university cafeteria reading “masturbation is fun” (this being 1976, doing such a thing would be considered embarrassing; these days it will probably earn you a course credit!). The results showed that when people wore a mask, they were more likely to carry the sign and required less money to do so ($30 compared to $48, on average).

Meanwhile, Miller and Rowold (1979) presented Halloween trick-or-treaters with a bowl of chocolates and told them they were allowed to take only two each. When the children thought they weren’t being watched, they helped themselves. Children without a mask broke the rule, taking more chocolates, 37% of the time, compared to 62% for masked children. The authors concluded that masks “lead to lower restraints on behaviour”.

The effect has similarly been found online: the online disinhibition effect refers to the tendency for people to act antisocially when anonymous online (Suler, 2004). There is even an infamous trolling movement calling itself Anonymous and using a mask as its symbol.

The disinhibiting effects of wearing a mask are described by psychologists in terms of a suspension of the superego’s control mechanisms, allowing subconscious impulses to take over. Saigre (1989) wrote that masks ‘short-cut’ conscious defence systems and encourage “massive regression” to a more primitive state; Castle (1986) wrote that eighteenth century masquerades allowed mask-wearers to release their repressed hedonistic and sexual impulses; and Caillois (1962) similarly wrote about European masked carnivals involving libidinal activities including “indecencies, jostling, provocative laughter, exposed breasts, mimicking buffoonery, a permanent incitement to riot, feasting and excessive talk, noise and movement”. In the 12th Century, Pope Innocent III banned masks as part of his fight against immorality; and in 1845, New York State made it illegal for more than two people to wear masks in public, after farmers wore masks to attack their landlords.

From a neuroimaging perspective, masks are known to inhibit identity and impulse control – both associated with executive function in the prefrontal cortex (e.g., Glannon, 2005; Tacikowski, Berger & Ehrsson, 2017). In other words, masks silence the Jiminy Cricket in the brain.

It is little wonder that covering our mouths would ‘shut us up’ psychologically. Studies have shown that clothing has a powerful effect on how we think (or not), via a principal known as enclothed cognition: wearing a lab coat enhances cognitive function (Adam & Galinsky, 2012), wearing a nurse’s scrubs increases empathy (López-Pérez et al., 2016), and wearing counterfeit brands increases the likelihood of cheating in a test (Gino, Norton & Ariely, 2010). Similarly, in the world of body language, someone putting their hand over their mouth is a sign that they are listening intently: they are ready to receive information, not to question it.

While no studies have looked at the effect of masks on verbal reasoning, it is fairly safe to assume that priming a ‘shutting up’ would have a cognitive effect. For example, extraverts are less compliant than introverts (Cohen et al., 2004; Gudjonsson et al., 2004); the development of conscience in humans is heavily linked to that of language (e.g., Arbib, 2006); and inner speech is highly related to cognitive functions (Alderson-Day & Fernyhough, 2015). Crucially, verbal reasoning is strongly correlated with moral reasoning (e.g., Hayes, Gifford & Hayes, 1998): being unable to ‘speak’ makes one less able to deduce what is moral and immoral behaviour.

There is also a more basic reason masks might make you stupid: decreasing oxygen flow to the brain. Face veils reduce ventilatory function in the long-term (Alghadir, Aly & Zafar, 2012), and surgical masks may reduce blood oxygenation among surgeons (Beder et al., 2008): believe it or not, covering your mouth makes it harder to breathe. Reviewing the N95 face mask, a 2010 study (Roberge et al.) concluded that “carbon dioxide and oxygen levels were significantly above and below, respectively, the ambient workplace standards” inside the mask. A post-COVID study found that 81% of 128 previously-fit healthcare workers developed headaches as a result of wearing personal protective equipment (Ong et al., 2020).

Not only do face masks make it hard to breathe, but the evidence that they even work to stop the spread of coronavirus is limited at best. A popular brand of mask even carries a warning on its packaging that it “will not provide any protection against COVID-19”; as for preventing carriers from spreading the disease, a meta-analysis found, for example, that of eight randomised control trial studies, six found no difference in transmission rates between control and intervention groups (while one found that a combination of masks and handwashing is more effective than education alone, and the other found that N95 masks are more effective than standard surgical masks; bin-Reza et al., 2012). Non-surgical masks, such as scarfs and cloths, are almost useless (Rengasamy et al., 2010). Masks may even be unhealthy, causing a build-up of bacteria around the face (Zhiqing et al., 2018).

The fact that masks likely don’t even work brings us to the final reason that wearing one inculcates stupidity and compliance: through a bombardment of lies, contradictions, and confusion, the state overwhelms your ability to reason clearly.

As Theodore Dalrymple wrote, “In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.”

The point of face masks is not to protect humans, but to diminish humanity – to rob people of their ego, their identity, and their autonomy. Masks are worn by disposable horror movie villains and ignorable background dancers; they make people less-than-human.

Dehumanisation is rarely followed by anything good. Face masks are another worrying portent of what’s to come, alongside a seismic shift in mainstream discourse. In an analysis of the Rwandan genocide, one of the first linguistic predictors was the tendency to look backwards, to blame, and to focus on past wrongs and injustices (Donohue, 2012), which will sound familiar to anyone unfortunate enough to have read The BBC or The Guardian recently. Similarly, where the Tutsis were referred to as cockroaches by the Hutus, and the Nazis depicted the Jews as rats, Nancy Pelosi recently promised to “fumigate” President Trump out of the White House.

It is hard to predict how the wheel of life will revolve in the coming years, but all signs point to trouble. During the crisis years of a generational cycle, only one thing can be guaranteed: the importance of a clear mind. To that end, allow yourself the dignity, identity and Logos of being human – and never, ever wear a mask.

https://thecritic.co.uk/face-masks-make-you-stupid/

https://fightingmonarch.files.wordpress....dec-22.pdf

https://henrymakow.com/AnIlluminatiPrimer-1.png

Veronica Swift - Illuminati Satanism Unveiled

June 27, 2023
AnIlluminatiPrimer-1.png

Veronica Swift's book, An Illuminati Primer:
Understanding the System through the Eyes of Its Whistleblowers,
published in April, reveals disturbing details
about the politicians and celebrities we worship.
They all belong to the Illuminati
which really is a satanic cult.

Below are some excerpts
which explain why Western
society is in a tailspin.

BY VERONICA SWIFT
(henrymakow.com)

"... The head of the Satanic Council holds a position called the "Phoenix", and that position was held for nearly 30 years by George Soros, who stepped down around 2018/2019. Soros was succeeded by Barack Obama, who is the current Phoenix of the Satanic Council. (ARA 031)

Each quadrant has a number of Grand High Priests and Priestesses, and one of the Grand High Priestesses for the Eastern US Quadrant was held by Gloria Vanderbilt until her death in 2019. She was supposed to be succeeded by Hillary Clinton, but for whatever reason, Hillary was unable to take that position, one she was groomed for her whole life. (ARA 21) ...

britains-prince-harry-duke-of-sussex-and-britains-meghan-news-photo-1155575739-1563127260.jpeg
For Gloria's position, two High Priestesses did battle, and the winner took that position. The two witches who participated in that particular battle for Gloria's position were Beyoncé of singing fame and Megan Markle, the wife of Prince Harry of the UK royalty. (ARA 21)  ..." (page 60-62)

"... The entire Musk clan is known to be deep in the Brotherhood System and has been outed by their former house girl/babysitter Rosemary, who calls herself Shalom Girl on YouTube. (SG 01)

Jessie has noted that Elon's grandfather Joshua N. Haldeman was connected to Joseph Mengele and other Nazis that were a part of the Illuminati. (GSR 01) One of the very high Tier 1 elite hierarchy individuals was Gloria Vanderbilt, and her son Anderson Cooper, CNN anchor, is also believed to be part of The System. ...."
(page 71)

"... Some Catholic Churches have underground incinerators. (ARA 004) The remains of children sacrificed in rituals on the grounds (or underneath) Catholic churches can be disposed of by incineration, and then, much to my own revulsion when I found this out, sometimes they take those remains and do other things with them, like create memorial diamonds from them, and then sell the diamonds for profit, or wear them as trophy diamonds in rings....." (page 97)

child-sacrifice8.jpeg
"... The top individuals of the Masonic lodges are high-ranking Luciferians in the Illuminati, according to both Jessie and Cheryl. Level 32 is the final level of masonry that can be achieved without human sacrifice being required. Level 33 Masons have achieved that rank by sacrificing a child. (ARA 050) ..." (page 103)

"... Some of the rituals have names like "Moonchild" or "Satanic Baptism" or "First Blasphemy/12-year-old ritual". The first ritual I heard about was the 12-year-old ritual, which is for elite hierarchy boys when they "graduate" from their childhood magic circle to begin to take part in their adult Brotherhood cohort/magic circle. It is also the first ritual where they willingly take the life of another individual, and from all accounts of it, it's a bit of a wild bloodbath. (RoR 080) Jessie tells of one 12-year-old ritual she watched as a young child, and the boy going through it was a Rothschild...

The 12-year-old boy also gets hung by a rope, and after being hung, the 12-year-old boy is raped, every which way you can imagine, by the members of the magic circle that will be his adult group affiliates. These individuals will be the mentors to this child for the rest of his life, and will guide him through his career and support him for life. (ARA 003)

In this particular ritual, the individuals present as part of the adult core group included Hillary Rodham Clinton and John Brennan. Another individual perpetrator present was Marilou Schroeder Whitney, a relative of the Vanderbilt clan. These adult individuals tell this child that he has to "renounce God and enter (his) position in the Brotherhood."

The renunciation of God is considered the "First Blasphemy." At that point the child is released, high on adrenochrome, which according to Jessie produces a psychosis so strong that you desire to "rip people's faces off" or shred them with your hands and teeth.

Jessie notes that when she had adrenochrome tested on her, when she was coming off of the drug she was put into a straitjacket and locked in a cupboard so she wouldn't hurt anyone. (GD 03, ARA 042, ARA 034)

ritual-child-sacrifice.png
He then begins his first murder by cannibalizing one of the hung children, and then the others who are in the deep part of the tiled pool-like area join him, and it becomes one giant bloodbath. (ARA 003) 4 Illuminati Grand High Priests presided over the ritual, including the late Reverend Monsignor Thomas C Brady, and Cardinal Timothy Michael Dolan. Both have day jobs in the Catholic Church, and are Luciferians on the side. After the rape of the 12-year-old child, one of the things that child does is willingly take his first life ... Corey Feldman and Corey Haim, Hollywood child-stars were there, as was Christina Applegate of TV's Married with Children fame, Carter Vanderbilt (son of Gloria Vanderbilt), Senator Robert Byrd, Ewan McGregor and Jimmy Saville were also named as being present at the festivities before the actual ritual. ..."
(page 132-134)

".... The people that are assigned to operate in these quadrants could be called by a name that designates their quadrant, for example Jacob Rothschild is called the 'Blue Dragon' because he operates in the western quadrant, and that quadrant's designative color is blue. (ARA 010)

The Belenoff's come from the Green Dragon family, because they are operationally based in the northern quadrant, and the north's color is green. (ARA 016, ARA 032) Another symbol that the Illuminati uses to communicate status, position and title with one another are rings. Rings hold stones, and depending upon the stone's color and size, this could indicate both their status and position in The System. Gloria Vanderbilt used to wear a ring with a large yellow stone, indicating her position title of Grand High Priestess in the eastern quadrant.

Large stone indicated that she was not just a High Priestess, who might wear a small yellow stone, but a grand high priestess. Rings that are thought to be indications of status and position have been spotted on Oprah Winfrey, Tom Hanks, Rachel Levine (the US Public Health Service Commissioned Corps), Qasem Soleimani, and others.

The Mothers of Darkness wear not only the ring that signifies their quadrant, but another black ring as well. Jessie says that the black signifies a "stone of power." The color of the metal in the ring can also signify level, if they're a "head high priest or priestess that ring will be in gold or white gold," whereas the "lower level individuals will have it in silver." (RR 31) These colors can also be used on city emblems, military logos, signage for companies, and a number of other things that the Brotherhood uses to signify ownership or rulership...."
(page 140)

hunter-b.jpeg
"... Hunter Biden is the child of an Illuminati member, and the FBI has protected him by withholding the contents of the laptop from the public. (DO 01022) Fiona Barnett says that clean/non-Illuminati members of the FBI tried repeatedly to charge Hillary Clinton and others with child trafficking charges, but "their efforts were thwarted by those in the chain of command above them" Fiona's book states that "The CIA trafficked the kids, the FBI covered their tracks." (FB 01)

The control by the Illuminati at the top of these organizations is complete. The FBI allows good people within their organization to "out" themselves by pursuing pedophile networks, for example, but then uses that to destroy their careers and replace them with individuals more likely to be loyal to the evil upper ranks. (FB 01)..." (page 178)

".... Svali doesn't take so kindly to Trump. She believes that both Trump and Biden are mind-controlled-- and that is an expert opinion based on her previous profession of "head programmer" in the Illuminati (SV 26, SV 57)

Additional plans that we haven't seen realized to date include that the Illuminati want the US currency to be totally devalued as this would put pressure on the people to accept a "One World Government in return for economic stabilization." The scariest sections of this plan include a second pandemic highly fatal to young children, and the implementation of hate laws to criminalize "Christianity, Judaism, and any political group that does not agree with the cult agenda." (SV 57)

We've heard Barack Obama talk about the New World Order, and George Bush Sr., as well as the United Nations, which is fitting because all three are involved in bringing it about. Cheryl Beck thinks that the reason it hasn't been brought to fruition is because of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the one that allows private ownership of firearms. (CB 01)

Antifa and Black Lives Matter are part of the planned chaos that they hope will usher in the NWO as well. (CS 10)
(page 182)

https://veronicaswift.blog/books/an-illuminati-primer/

2023-06-22 ::: There Was No Pandemic (essay)
There Was No Pandemic

By Denis G. Rancourt, PhD

June 22, 2023

This is radical.

The essay is based on my May 17, 2023 testimony for the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) in Ottawa, Canada, my 894-page book of exhibits in support of that testimony, and our continued research.

I am an accomplished interdisciplinary scientist and physicist, and a former tenured Full Professor of physics and lead scientist, originally at the University of Ottawa.

I have written over 30 scientific reports relevant to COVID, starting April 18, 2020 for the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (ocla.ca/covid), and recently for a new non-profit corporation (correlation‑canada.org/research). Presently, all my work and interviews about COVID are documented on my website created to circumvent the barrage of censorship (denisrancourt.ca).

In addition to critical reviews of published science, the main data that my collaborators and I analyse is all‑cause mortality.

All-cause mortality by time (day, week, month, year, period), by jurisdiction (country, state, province, county), and by individual characteristics of the deceased (age, sex, race, living accomodations) is the most reliable data for detecting and epidemiologically characterizing events causing death, and for gauging the population-level impact of any surge or collapse in deaths from any cause.

Such data is not susceptible to reporting bias or to any bias in attributing causes of death. We have used it to detect and characterize seasonality, heat waves, earthquakes, economic collapses, wars, population aging, long-term societal development, and societal assaults such as those occurring in the COVID period, in many countries around the world, and over recent history, 1900-present.

Interestingly, none of the post-second-world-war Centers-for-Disease-Control-and-Prevention-promoted (CDC‑promoted) viral respiratory disease pandemics (1957-58, “H2N2”; 1968, “H3N2”; 2009, “H1N1 again”) can be detected in the all‑cause mortality of any country. Unlike all the other causes of death that are known to affect mortality, these so‑called pandemics did not cause any detectable increase in mortality, anywhere.

The large 1918 mortality event, which was recruited to be a textbook viral respiratory disease pandemic (“H1N1”), occurred prior to the inventions of antibiotics and the electron microscope, under horrific post-war public-sanitation and economic-stress conditions. The 1918 deaths have been proven by histopathology of preserved lung tissue to have been caused by bacterial pneumonia. This is shown in several independent and non-contested published studies.

My first report analysing all-cause mortality was published on June 2, 2020, at censorship-prone Research Gate, and was entitled “All-cause mortality during COVID-19 - No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response”. It showed that hot spots of sudden surges in all‑cause mortality occurred only in specific locations in the Northern-hemisphere Western World, which were synchronous with the March 11, 2020 declaration of a pandemic. Such synchronicity is impossible within the presumed framework of a spreading viral respiratory disease, with or without airplanes, because the calculated time from seeding to mortality surge is highly dependent on local societal circumstances, by several months to years. I attributed the excess deaths to aggressive measures and hospital treatment protocols known to have been applied suddenly at that time in those localities.

The work was pursued in greater depth with collaborators for several years and continues. We have shown repeatedly that excess mortality most often refused to cross national borders and inter-state lines. The invisible virus targets the poor and disabled and carries a passport. It also never kills until governments impose socio-economic and care-structure transformations on vulnerable groups within the domestic population.

Here are my conclusions, from our detailed studies of all-cause mortality in the COVID period, in combination with socio-economic and vaccine-rollout data:

-    If there had been no pandemic propaganda or coercion, and governments and the medical establishment had simply gone on with business as usual, then there would not have been any excess mortality
-    There was no pandemic causing excess mortality
-    Measures caused excess mortality
-    COVID-19 vaccination caused excess mortality

Regarding the vaccines, we quantified many instances in which a rapid rollout of a dose in the imposed vaccine schedule was synchronous with an otherwise unexpected peak in all-cause mortality, at times in the seasonal cycle and of magnitudes that have not previously been seen in the historic record of mortality.

In this way, we showed that the vaccination campaign in India caused the deaths of 3.7 million fragile residents. In Western countries, we quantified the average all-ages rate of death to be 1 death for every 2000 injections, to increase exponentially with age (doubling every additional 5 years of age), and to be as large as 1 death for every 100 injections for those 80 years and older. We estimated that the vaccines had killed 13 million worldwide.



If one accepts my above-numbered conclusions, and the analyses that we have performed, then there are several implications about how one perceives reality regarding what actually did and did not occur.

First, whereas epidemics of fatal infections are very real in care homes, in hospitals, and with degenerate living conditions, the viral respiratory pandemic risk promoted by the USA‑led “pandemic response” industry is not a thing. It is most likely fabricated and maintained for ulterior motives, other than saving humanity.

Second, in addition to natural events (heat waves, earthquakes, extended large-scale droughts), significant events that negatively affect mortality are large assaults against domestic populations, affecting vulnerable residents, such as:

-    sudden devastating economic deterioration (the Great Depression, the dust bowl, the dissolution of the Soviet Union),
-    war (including social-class restructuring),
-    imperial or economic occupation and exploitation (including large-scale exploitative land use), and
-    the well-documented measures and destruction applied during the COVID period.

Otherwise, in a stable society, mortality is extremely robust and is not subject to large rapid changes. There is no empirical evidence that large changes in mortality can be induced by sudden appearances of new pathogens. In the contemporary era of the dominant human species, humanity is its worst enemy, not nature.

Third, coercive measures imposed to reduce the risk of transmission (such as distancing, direction arrows, lockdown, isolation, quarantine, Plexiglas barriers, face shields and face masks, elbow bumps, etc.) are palpably unscientific; and the underlying concern itself regarding “spread” was not ever warranted and is irrational, since there is no evidence in reliable mortality data that there ever was a particularly virulent pathogen.

In fact, the very notion of “spread” during the COVID period is rigorously disproved by the temporal and spatial variations of excess all-cause mortality, everywhere that it is sufficiently quantified, worldwide. For example, the presumed virus that killed 1.3 million poor and disabled residents of the USA did not cross the more-than-thousand-kilometer land border with Canada, despite continuous and intense economic exchanges. Likewise, the presumed virus that caused synchronous mortality hotspots in March-April-May 2020 (such as in New York, Madrid region, London, Stockholm, and northern Italy) did not spread beyond those hotspots. 

Interestingly, in this regard, the historical seasonal variations (12 month period) in all-cause mortality, known for more than 100 years, are inverted in the northern and southern global hemispheres, and show no evidence of “spread” whatsoever. Instead, these patterns, in a given hemisphere, show synchronous increases and decreases of mortality across the entire hemisphere. Would the “spreading” causal agent(s) always take exactly 6 months to cross into the other hemisphere, where it again causes mortality changes that are synchronous across the hemisphere? Many epidemiologists have long-ago concluded that person-to-person “contact” spreading of respiratory diseases cannot explain and is disproved by the seasonal patterns of all-cause mortality. Why the CDC et al. are not systematically ridiculed in this regard is beyond this scientist’s comprehension.

Instead, outside of extremely poor living conditions, we should look to the body of work produced by Professor Sheldon Cohen and co‑authors (USA) who established that two dominant factors control whether intentionally challenged college students become infected and the severity of the respiratory illness when they are infected:

-    degree of experienced psychological stress
-    degree of social isolation

The negative impact of experienced psychological stress on the immune system is a large current and established area of scientific study, dutifully ignored by vaccine interests, and we now know that the said impact is dramatically larger in elderly individuals, where nutrition (gut biome ecology) is an important co-factor.

Of course, I do not mean that causal agents do not exist, such as bacteria, which can cause pneumonia; nor that there are not dangerous environmental concentrations of such causal agents in proximity to fragile individuals, such as in hospitals and on clinicians’ hands, notoriously.

Fourth, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess mortality, the debate about gain-of-function research and an escaped bioweapon is irrelevant.

I do not mean that the Department of Defence (DoD) does not fund gain-of-function and bioweapon research (abroad, in particular), I do not mean that there are not many US patents for genetically modified microbial organisms having potential military applications, and I do not mean that there have not previously been impactful escapes or releases of bioweapon vectors and pathogens. For example, the Lyme disease controversy in the USA may be an example of a bioweapon leak (see Kris Newby’s 2019 book “Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons”).

Generally, for obvious reasons, any pathogen that is extremely virulent will not also be extremely contagious. There are billions of years of cumulative evolutionary pressures against the existence of any such pathogen, and that result will be deeply encoded into all lifeforms.

Furthermore, it would be suicidal for any regime to vehemently seek to create such a pathogen. Bioweapons are intended to be delivered to specific target areas, except in the science fiction wherein immunity from a bioweapon that is both extremely virulent and extremely contagious can be reliably delivered to one’s own population and soldiers.

In my view, if anything COVID is close to being a bioweapon, it is the military capacity to massively, and repeatedly, rollout individual injections, which are physical vectors for whichever substances the regime wishes to selectively inject into chosen populations, while imposing complete compliance down to one’s own body, under the cover of protecting public health.

This is the same regime that practices wars of complete nation destruction and societal annihilation, under the cover of spreading democracy and women’s rights. And I do not mean China.

Fifth, again, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess mortality, there was no need for any special treatment protocols, beyond the usual thoughtful, case-by-case, diagnostics followed by the clinician’s chosen best approach.

Instead, vicious new protocols killed patients in hotspots that applied those protocols in the first months of the declared pandemic.

This was followed in many states by imposed coercive societal measures, which were contrary to individual health: fear, panic, paranoia, induced psychological stress, social isolation, self-victimization, loss of work and volunteer activity, loss of social status, loss of employment, business bankruptcy, loss of usefulness, loss of caretakers, loss of venues and mobility, suppression of freedom of expression, etc.

Only the professional class did better, comfortably working from home, close to family, while being catered to by an army of specialised home-delivery services.

Unfortunately, the medical establishment did not limit itself to assaulting and isolating vulnerable patients in hospitals and care facilities. It also systematically withdrew normal care, and attacked physicians who refused to do so.

In virtually the entire Western World, antibiotic prescriptions were cut and maintained low by approximately 50% of the pre-COVID rates. This would have had devastating effects in the USA, in particular, where:

-    the CDC’s own statistics, based on death certificates, has approximately 50% of the million or so deaths associated with COVID having bacterial pneumonia as a listed comorbidity (there was a massive epidemic of bacterial pneumonia in the USA, which no one talked about)
-    the Southern poor states historically have much higher antibiotic prescription rates (this implies high susceptibility to bacterial pneumonia)
-    excess mortality during the COVID period is very strongly correlated (r = +0.86) — in fact proportional to — state-wise poverty

Sixth, since our conclusion is that there is no evidence that there was any particularly virulent pathogen causing excess mortality, there was no public-health reason to develop and deploy vaccines; not even if one accepted the tenuous proposition that any vaccine has ever been effective against a presumed viral respiratory disease.

Add to this that all vaccines are intrinsically dangerous and our above-described vaccine-dose fatality rate quantifications, and we must recognize that the vaccines contributed significantly to excess mortality everywhere that they were imposed.

In conclusion, the excess mortality was not caused by any particularly virulent new pathogen. COVID so-called response in-effect was a massive multi-pronged state and iatrogenic attack against populations, and against societal support structures, which caused all the excess mortality, in every jurisdiction.

It is only natural now to ask “what drove this?”, “who benefited?” and “which groups sustained permanent structural disadvantages?”

In my view, the COVID assault can only be understood in the symbiotic contexts of geopolitics and large-scale social-class transformations. Dominance and exploitation are the drivers. The failing USA-centered global hegemony and its machinations create dangerous conditions for virtually everyone.

https://denisrancourt.ca/uploads_entries...%20pub.pdf

https://rielpolitik.files.wordpress.com/...age-34.png

Over the years, it’s become clear that science can be a very hazardous occupation. According to witnesses, a Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) scientist by the name of Zhou Yusen was thrown to his death off the lab’s roof in May 2020, just three months after he’d filed a patent for a COVID vaccine.

The timing of the patent filing is perhaps as curious as his death. According to some experts, the data included in the patent suggests he’d been working on the vaccine prior to the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, which authorities have insisted was a previously unknown virus of zoonotic origin. According to a June 18, 2023, report by The Sun:1

“Zhou Yusen, 54, died in May 2020 while working for the People’s Liberation Army and alongside Wuhan scientists … including Shi Zhengli — dubbed ‘batwoman’ for her work on coronavirus in bats …

U.S. investigators have now revealed that Zhou may have had knowledge of the lab leak long before it was released to the world. Vaccination experts told investigators that it would have been ‘impossible’ to generate the data Zhou had in the patent for the vaccine unless he had been working on it for at least three months.

This could mean scientists in Wuhan were working on a COVID-19 vaccination in November, before news of the virus had left China. The first case of COVID was reported in Wuhan in December 2019 — but the World Health Organization did not declare a pandemic until March 11, 2020.

It means the vaccine patent was filed just a short time after China first admitted there was human-to-human transmission of COVID — and two weeks before a pandemic was officially declared.”

Basically, if Yusen worked on a COVID-19 vaccine no later than November 2019, that would further strengthen the claim that SARS-CoV-2 was created in a lab, and subsequently escaped from that lab. In addition to that, we also have new evidence linking SARS-CoV-2 to Chinese bioweapons research.

SARS-CoV-2 Linked to Bioweapons Research
According to an investigation2 by The Sunday Times’ Jonathan Calvert and George Arbuthnott published June 10, 2023, scientists at the WIV were working in close collaboration with the Chinese military to create a new mutant coronavirus shortly before the COVID pandemic began:

“Investigators who scrutinized top-secret intercepted communications and scientific research believe Chinese scientists were running a covert project of dangerous experiments, which caused a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and started the Covid-19 outbreak.

The U.S. investigators say one of the reasons there is no published information on the work is because it was done in collaboration with researchers from the Chinese military, which was funding it and which, they say, was pursuing bioweapons … [Our] new investigation paints the clearest picture yet of what happened in the Wuhan laboratory.”

According to Calvert and Arbuthnott, WIV researchers — and the Chinese military — obtained “cutting-edge virus manipulation techniques” from Ralph Baric, Ph.D., a leading U.S. coronavirus scientist. They also received funding for gain-of-function research from the U.S. government through the EcoHealth Alliance.

The weaponization of a SARS-like virus appears to have begun in 2016, after miners died from a SARS-like respiratory infection. Chinese researchers subsequently discovered two new coronaviruses in a mineshaft in Mojiang, one of which is the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 found so far.

According to The Times, this event sparked off a classified bioweapons program under which SARS-CoV-2 was eventually developed. This would explain why WIV researchers were also working on a COVID vaccine well before the initial outbreak in Wuhan.

Super-Lethal Coronavirus May Still Exist in Wuhan Lab
Disturbingly, the evidence shows WIV researchers also created a coronavirus far more lethal than SARS-CoV-2 — one with a 75% kill rate — and this research was in part funded by EcoHealth grant money from the U.S. government.3 We can count ourselves lucky that this wasn’t the one that got out.

That specific virus — a fusion of two coronaviruses found in the Mojiang mineshaft called WIV1 and SHC014 — was also highly infectious early in the illness, virtually guaranteeing that an outbreak would be impossible to contain. Vaccines and drugs developed against SARS were also ineffective against this extraordinary virus.

While U.S. funding agencies knew about EcoHealth’s work on bat viruses, the Chinese military may have been running a secret parallel bioweapons project that not even EcoHealth’s president Peter Daszak, who worked closely with Shi, knew about. Calvert and Arbuthnott write:4

“The root of this project goes back to an incident that allegedly drew the attention of the Chinese military to the work of scientists in Wuhan. In 2012, the Wuhan institute’s researchers investigated an abandoned copper mine with a large bat colony in the Mojiang region of south China.

Six men clearing out bat guano there were struck down by a mystery illness that caused fever, coughs and pneumonia. All the men required hospital treatment and three died. Tests on the men for various illnesses came back negative but they tested positive for antibodies to an unknown coronavirus.

It has been possible, however, to piece together what happened from a master’s thesis by a medic at the hospital that treated the men and a PhD paper by a student of the director of the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention.

The incident happened while the institute was working on EcoHealth’s Predict programme, which was aimed at finding this type of virus crossover between animals and humans. But the Wuhan institute withheld information about the mine deaths from EcoHealth and the U.S. government.”

At Least Nine Relatives of SARS-CoV-2 Exist
Shi and her team reportedly spent four years collecting bat samples from the Mojiang mine. Among the pathogens found were 293 coronaviruses. In 2016, Shi published a paper describing a coronavirus found at the site that was from a lineage of SARS scientists had never seen before. She called it RaBtCoV/4991.

She left out some crucial facts, however. She made no mention of the miners who died after getting infected at the collection site, nor did she mention that she’d found eight other SARS-related coronaviruses from the same previously unknown family as RaBtCoV/4991.

Early in the COVID pandemic, RaBtCoV/4991 was identified as the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2, but there were also eight others from that same family, the existence of which has been kept secret.

Once the WIV was forced to admit they had the closest known relative to SARS-CoV-2 in their freezers, they tried throwing researchers off the trail by changing the name of RaBtCoV/4991 to RaTG13. This way, the virus could not be easily linked to the mine and the dead miners.

Shadow Project
Calvert and Arbuthnott continue:5

“As the world emerged from lockdown, US State Department investigators were given access to secret intelligence on what had been happening in China in the months and years before COVID emerged.

More than a dozen investigators were given unparalleled access to ‘metadata, phone information and internet information’ from intercepts collected by the U.S. intelligence services.

The investigators’ report was published in early 2021. It made two assertions: that Wuhan scientists were conducting experiments on RaTG13 from the Moijang mine, and that covert military research, including laboratory animal experiments, was being done at the institute before the pandemic …

The Sunday Times has spoken to three members of the team. The intelligence they saw suggests the types of risky experiments undertaken on the Shitou cave SARS viruses were also conducted in secret on RaTG13 and the other COVID-19-like viruses from the mine.

‘They were working with the nine different COVID variants,’ one of the investigators said. They believe one virus at the Wuhan institute was an even closer match to COVID-19 than RaTG13. ‘We are confident they were working on a closer unpublished variant — possibly collected in Mojiang,’ the source added.

The investigators spoke to two researchers working at a U.S. laboratory who were collaborating with the Wuhan institute at the time of the outbreak. They said the Wuhan scientists had inserted furin cleavage sites into viruses in 2019 in exactly the way proposed in Daszak’s failed funding application to DARPA.

The investigators also saw evidence that the institute was conducting ‘serial passaging’ experiments on at least one of the mine viruses … Dr. Steven Quay, a U.S. scientist who advised the State Department on its investigation … believes COVID-19 was created by inserting a furin cleavage site into one of the mine viruses and then serial passaging it through humanized mice.

He submitted a statement to the US Senate explaining the process. ‘You infect the mice, wait a week or so, and then recover the virus from the sickest mice. Then you repeat. In a matter of weeks this directed evolution will produce a virus that can kill every humanized mouse.’ This explains why from the beginning of the outbreak, he says, the pandemic virus was so remarkably well adapted to infect humans.

One of the reasons there is no published information on such work, according to all three investigators, is because the shadow project on the mine viruses at the Wuhan institute was being funded by the Chinese military.”

Chinese Military Targeted Coronaviruses for Bioweapons Study
The pair also cite a 2015 book written by People’s Liberation Army researchers, published by the Chinese military academy, which stated that SARS viruses represent a “new era of genetic weapons” that can be “artificially manipulated into an emerging human disease virus, then weaponized and unleashed.”

According to one of the investigators interviewed by Calvert and Arbuthnott, the Chinese military started conducting secret experiments on RaTG13 (formerly RaBtCoV/4991) in 2016, one year after the publication of that book, in which the authors — one of whom has collaborated with WIV scientists on several occasions — detailed how SARS could be weaponized by fusing it with other viruses and then using serial passaging to make it more dangerous to humans.

Is that a coincidence? The investigators Calvert and Arbuthnott spoke to don’t think so, in part because the Chinese military was also working on a vaccine for this newly created virus:6

“The investigators believe the Chinese military had taken an interest in developing a vaccine for the viruses so they could be used as potential bioweapons. If a country could inoculate its population against its own secret virus, it might have a weapon to shift the balance of world power.

The PLA had its own vaccine specialist, Zhou Yusen, a decorated military scientist at the academy, who had collaborated with the Wuhan scientists on a study of the MERS coronavirus and was working with them at the time of the outbreak.

Suspicion fell on him after the pandemic because he produced a patent for a COVID vaccine with remarkable speed in February 2020, little more than a month after the outbreak of the virus had first been admitted to the world by China …

One of the U.S, investigators said testimony from scientists connected to the Wuhan institute’s collaborators suggested COVID-19 vaccine work was going on at the laboratory before the outbreak.

In May 2020, aged just 54, Zhou appears to have died, a fact mentioned only in passing in a Chinese-media report and in a scientific paper that placed the word “deceased” in brackets after his name. Witnesses are said to have told the U.S. investigation that Zhou fell from the roof of the Wuhan institute, although this has not been verified.”

Patient Zero Identified
In related news, tireless sleuths have also produced evidence showing that Patient Zero was a Chinese doctor named Ben Hu, who had received funding from the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) to conduct research on novel bat coronaviruses, including research to assess the pathogenicity of bat coronaviruses on transgenic mice with human ACE2 receptors.7

As reported by the White Coat Waste Project (WCW), a transparency advocacy organization, in mid-June 2023:8

“Scientific and intelligence authorities and most Americans now believe that a lab leak in Wuhan caused COVID. Still, finding Patient Zero remains key to definitively determining what prompted the pandemic.

A WCW Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) investigation9 and 2021 lawsuit10 — paired with other newly-leaked U.S. intelligence — further points to the Wuhan animal lab as ground zero …

[In] January 2021, the State Department reported11 that white coats at the Wuhan lab who were working on coronavirus animal experiments fell ill in November 2019 with COVID-like symptoms, before the first case of COVID was even reported.

A few months later, reports12 detailed that in November 2019 three Wuhan lab experimenters became so sick that they had to be hospitalized. Another report13 indicated that the wife of a Wuhan white coat died in December 2019 from a COVID-like illness.

The identity of the sick Wuhan animal lab staffers has been kept a secret by U.S. and CCP authorities … until now. A new report14 based on a U.S. government source identifies the three sick Wuhan lab staffers as Ben Hu, Yu Ping, and Yan Zhu. The source confirmed their identities with ‘100%’ certainty.”

Patient Zero Was Involved in Risky Coronavirus Research
According to the WCW, the three lab employees all worked on bat coronaviruses on humanized mice, and Hu is named as the lead for NIAID-funded gain-of-function research on SARS-like coronaviruses. The WCW recapped its findings:15

“U.S. taxpayer-funded Wuhan white coats collect wild coronaviruses from bats in remote caves in China without adequate protective gear, transport the viruses to a lab in a major metropolitan area, do gain-of-function animal experiments to make the viruses more contagious and deadly to humans, and then fall ill with COVID-like symptoms and their identities and medical histories are covered-up.

Thanks to WCW’s investigations and advocacy and work with lawmakers including Waste Warrior Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS), we’re getting closer to finding the smoking gun that establishes where COVID came from.”

One of the key features that makes SARS-CoV-2 so unique (and so infectious to humans) is the presence of a furin cleavage site (FCS). And, according to Dr. Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and laboratory director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology, Patient Zero may have been responsible for the insertion of that specific feature. Ebright told The Intercept:16

“The significance of the fact that ‘patient zero,’ Ben Hu, received U.S. funding from NIH and USAID in 2018-2019 is that NIH and USAID support to Hu potentially directly funded the insertion of FCS sequences into SARS-like coronaviruses that had been proposed in EcoHealth’s/WIV’s unsuccessful 2018 DARPA grant application.

Just as USAID and NIH support to Shi potentially funded the insertion of FCS sequences into SARS-like coronaviruses that had been proposed in EcoHealth’s/WIV’s unsuccessful 2018 DARPA grant application.”

The DARPA grant application Ebright is referring to was a proposal by Shi, Baric and Daszak, to insert a furin cleavage site into a coronavirus to make it capable of infecting mammalian cells. They already had proof-of-concept research showing it could be done. DARPA rejected the proposal, but it appears this experimentation took place anyway, at the WIV, under a secret bioweapons research program, with U.S. funding.

Ending Gain of Function Research Is the Answer
The primary contention now is whether China does, in fact, have a secret bioweapons program. As reported by The Conversation:17

“The Sunday Times article claims to present new data, but it is not indisputable. And even merely bringing up the issue of biowarfare with China would be diplomatically contentious and ruffle a lot of political feathers.

As such, the international community will not want to take the dispute over COVID-19 forward unless they have definitive evidence of a Chinese biowarfare program. But, given the nature of biological research, we may never be able to get that certainty.”

The Conversation reviews the potential avenues political leaders could take, such as filing an official complaint through the United Nations that China may have violated the 1972 biological weapons convention. The UN secretary-general also has a mechanism for investigation of alleged use of biological weapons that would force an investigation.

The problem with focusing on whether SARS-CoV-2 was intentionally developed as a biological weapon is that China is hardly the only country in violation of the bioweapons convention. The best answer, I think, would be to ban all forms of gain of function research globally, including low-tech techniques such as serial passaging, which doesn’t involve genetic engineering.Nature would never concoct the kinds of souped-up chimeras we now find in labs around the world, and most if not all serious pandemics are traceable back to labs, not zoonotic spillover.

Even if China was successfully charged with violating the bioweapons convention, it would do nothing to stop mad scientists from experimenting on pathogens to make them more lethal. There are any number of justifications for doing such research, including the overused and wholly false idea that we need to stay ahead of nature.

The fact is, nature would never concoct the kinds of souped-up chimeras we now find in labs around the world, and most if not all serious pandemics are traceable back to labs, not zoonotic spillover. That certainly goes for COVID-19 as well.

At present, there’s no evidence whatsoever to support zoonotic spillover. Everything points to SARS-CoV-2 being created in a lab and then, somehow, getting out.18 U.S. authorities clearly also helped cover up the lab leak, probably because they helped fund it.

White House Slow-Walks Lab Leak Investigation
Still to this day, the Biden administration seems to be more concerned about protecting China-U.S. political relations than getting to the truth, as it’s delaying planned restrictions on investment in China to force it to declassify and share data related to the origin of COVID.

The White House has even overlooked blatant Chinese espionage over the U.S. mainland, ostensibly to “improve” relations with Beijing. On top of that, the director of National Intelligence, Avril Haines, failed to make public “all information relating to the origins of COVID-19” by the deadline, June 18, 2023, as ordered by Congress in March this year.19,20 As reported by NBC News, June 16, 2023:21

“The Biden administration has delayed punitive economic measures against China and played down Beijing’s intensifying intelligence-gathering to avoid jeopardizing its efforts to revive diplomatic talks between the two governments, according to former U.S. officials, congressional aides, Western diplomats and regional experts …

‘They want to calm the waters with China,’ said a former U.S. official with knowledge of the administration’s deliberations … Administration officials have provided no public update since a Chinese surveillance balloon traversed the U.S. before being downed by an American fighter jet in February …

A recently completed investigation of the balloon’s debris found that Beijing’s capabilities are far more sophisticated than the U.S. had believed, said a current senior U.S. official and a former senior U.S. official briefed on the findings. ‘Their capabilities are significant,’ one of the officials said, ‘better than we thought they were’ …

The administration is also poised to miss a congressional deadline that expires Sunday [June 18, 2023] to declassify documents related to the origins of COVID-19. Republican lawmakers have accused the White House of dragging its feet on the issue.

They say that the administration’s approach is misguided and that China is not holding back on retaliatory measures against the U.S., including imposing sanctions on the U.S. tech firm Micron Technology …

An administration official said the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is currently carrying out a ‘careful declassification process’ and that ‘getting to the bottom of the origins of COVID-19 remains a priority for the President and the United States.’ They did not say when the administration will declassify the documents.”

https://rielpolitik.com/2023/06/29/dead-...h-mercola/

Dissolution of Spike Protein by Nattokinase
Holy Grail of COVID-19 Vaccine Detoxification
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™
Feb 21, 2023

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

Far and away the most common question I get from those who took one of the COVID-19 vaccines is: “how do I get this out of my body.” The mRNA and adenoviral DNA products were rolled out with no idea on how or when the body would ever breakdown the genetic code. The synthetic mRNA carried on lipid nanoparticles appears to be resistant to breakdown by human ribonucleases by design so the product would be long-lasting and produce the protein product of interest for a considerable time period. This would be an advantage for a normal human protein being replaced in a rare genetic deficiency state (e.g. alpha galactosidase in Fabry’s disease). However, it is a big problem when the protein is the pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 Spike. The adenoviral DNA (Janssen) should broken down by deoxyribonuclease, however this has not be exhaustively studied.

This leaves dissolution of Spike protein as a therapeutic goal for the vaccine injured. With the respiratory infection, Spike is processed and activated by cellular proteases including transmembrane serine protein 2 (TMPRSS2), cathepsin, and furin. With vaccination, these systems may be avoided by systemic administration and production of Spike protein within cells. As a result, the pathogenesis of vaccine injury syndromes is believed to be driven by accumulation of Spike protein in cells, tissues, and organs.

Nattokinase is an enzyme is produced by fermenting soybeans with bacteria Bacillus subtilis var. natto and has been available as an oral supplement. It degrades fibrinogen, factor VII, cytokines, and factor VIII and has been studied for its cardiovascular benefits. Out of all the available therapies I have used in my practice and among all the proposed detoxification agents, I believe nattokinase and related peptides hold the greatest promise for patients at this time.

Tanikawa et al examined the effect of nattokinase on the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. In the first experiment they demonstrated that Spike was degraded in a time and dose dependent manner in a cell lysate preparation that could be analogous to a vaccine recipient. The second experiment demonstrated that nattokinase degraded the Spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. This reproduced a similar study done by Oba and colleagues in 2021.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...0x2200.png

Tanikawa T, Kiba Y, Yu J, Hsu K, Chen S, Ishii A, Yokogawa T, Suzuki R, Inoue Y, Kitamura M. Degradative Effect of Nattokinase on Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2. Molecules. 2022 Aug 24;27(17):5405. doi: 10.3390/molecules27175405. PMID: 36080170; PMCID: PMC9458005.

Nattokinase is dosed in fibrinolytic units (FU) per gram and can vary according to purity. Kurosawa and colleagues have shown in humans that after a single oral dose of 2000 FU D-dimer concentrations at 6, and 8 hours, and blood fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products at 4 hours after administration elevated significantly (p < 0.05, respectively). Thus an empiric starting dose could be 2000 FU twice a day. Full pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies have not been completed, but several years of market use as an over-the-counter supplement suggests nattokinase is safe with the main caveat being excessive bleeding and cautions with concurrent antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs.

Based on these findings, nattokinase and similar products such as serrapeptase should undergo well-funded, accelerated preclinical and clinical development programs. The issue at hand is the urgency of time, similar to that with SARS-CoV-2 infection and empiric early therapy. It will take up to 20 years to have a fully developed pharmaceutical profile to characterize the safety and efficacy of nattokinase in the treatment of vaccine injury and post-COVID syndromes. Large number of people are sick now and many believe empiric treatment is justified given sufficiently low risk of side effects and potentially high reward. My recommendation is to discuss this with your doctor or seek a specialist in holistic or naturopathic medicine who is experienced with the safety profile of nattokinase in a range of applications.

If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and your extended circles.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9458005/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...via%3Dihub

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article...p11601.pdf

Dr. Colleen Huber
Writes The Defeat Of COVID
Feb 21
I have asked my covid-vaccinated patients to take nattokinase 2000 units per day, while running these labs every 3 months: D-dimer, CBC/platelets, fibrinogen, PT/INR. Naturopathic physicians have recommended nattokinase and similar for decades for our cardiovascular patients, and I have never known it to cause new problems. It seems to be generally well-tolerated.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p...attokinase

Ivermectin's Mechanism of Action Against SARS-CoV-2 Described
SHAME on the hospital systems that systematically denied patients (and their begging families) this FDA-approved, Nobel prize winning, wonder drug.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™
Jan 2, 2023

By JOHN LEAKE
Satoshi Ōmura, discoverer of Streptomyces avermectinius, winner of the Nobel Prize in Medicine 2015.

Researching our book—The Courage to Face COVID-19: Preventing Hospitalization and Death While Battling the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex—was often a distressing and maddening experience. The systematic lying about hydroxychloroquine to suppress its use in the outpatient setting was infuriating. However, for me, the most upsetting stories were about people who died in hospital after being systematically denied ivermectin. The sheer brutality of hospital chiefs and their attorneys, who fought tooth and nail against the administration of ivermectin to dying patients, must surely be the most morally repugnant story in modern medical history.

As we document in our book, Drs. Pierre Kory, Paul Marik, and Tess Lawrie were on the front line of fighting for ivermectin in the hospital setting. Drs. Jean-Jacques and Juliana Cepelowicz Rajter published their seminal (ICON) study in the October 12, 2020 edition of the CHEST journal of pulmonary medicine. The investigative journalists, Michael Capuzzo and Mary Beth Pfeiffer, did a splendid job of covering this story in real time. All of the above are heroic figures of great intellectual and moral discernment to whom we should all be grateful.

Many patients who were fortunate enough to prevail in court and receive ivermectin enjoyed an astonishing improvement of their condition within 24 hours of receiving their first dose—a recovery that struck family members as miraculous.

In listening to their stories, I often asked myself: “How on earth could this substance (macrocyclic lactone)—derived from a bacteria (Streptomyces avermectinius) found in a soil sample on a golf course in Japan—possibly work such miracles?” Truly these testimonies struck me as the most wondrous stories I’d ever heard, and I occasionally asked myself if the recoveries observed were a fluke or the result of some other unknown factors.

To be sure, we already knew from in vitro and from prior studies that ivermectin had demonstrated potent anti-viral activity, but the precise cause of action was unknown. Now, thanks to a study recently published by a research team at MEPHI, Aix-Marseille Université, we have a highly plausible description of ivermectin’s mechanism of action against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

In order to understand this mechanism, the reader must first understand that the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induces Hemagglutination—i.e., a reaction that causes clumping of red blood cells. A glycoprotein on the viral surface, namely hemagglutinin, interacts with red blood cells, leading to the clumping of red blood cells and the formation of a lattice.

As the Aix-Marseille team documents in their study: IVERMECTIN blocked HEMAGGLUTINATION when added to RED BLOOD CELLS prior to spike protein and reversed HEMAGGLUTINATION when added afterward.

By reversing the clumping of red blood cells, ivermectin enabled the dying patient’s proper respiratory function to return, thereby generating his or her astonishing recovery.

If the Aix-Marsaille team’s findings are correct—and we have no reason to doubt that they are—they provide the final validation and vindication of the dying patients and their families who literally begged for the wonder drug.

SHAME on the hospital administrators and their thuggish attorneys who denied the countless dying wishes. SHAME on the federal health officials who propagated the LIE that Ivermectin was merely a “horse de-wormer.” SHAME on the useful idiot media pundits such as CNN broadcasters and Late-Night Comedy hosts who flooded the zone with this foul lie.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p...on-against

Antiviral Effects of Nattokinase
Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 and Bovine Herpes Virus-1 Demonstrated in Vitro
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™
May 3, 2023

https://substackcdn.com/video_upload/pos...scoded.mp3

Recently there has been intense focus on “natto” derived from the fermentation of steamed soy by bacillus subtilis. Nattokinase is a proteolytic enzyme used as an oral supplement by the Japanese for the chronic treatment of atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease. Now a recent study in the COVID-19 era by the Japanese demonstrated preventive antiviral effects against SARS-CoV-2 mutant strains and bovine herpes virus type 1. The mechanism appears to be proteolytic cleavage of viral proteins.

Oba and colleagues performed a series of experiments with various concentrations of nattokinase in preclinical models. They found: 1) nattokinase effectively stopped infection of human cells in culture from SARS-CoV-2 and bovine herpes virus type 1, 2) the proteolytic effect of nattokinase was heat sensitive.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...4x1328.png

Oba M, Rongduo W, Saito A, Okabayashi T, Yokota T, Yasuoka J, Sato Y, Nishifuji K, Wake H, Nibu Y, Mizutani T. Natto extract, a Japanese fermented soybean food, directly inhibits viral infections including SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021 Sep 17;570:21-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.07.034. Epub 2021 Jul 13. PMID: 34271432; PMCID: PMC8276596.

While many around the world feel they cannot wait for large-scale randomized trials of nattokinase in the treatment of vaccine injury syndromes, they may not realize there may be an additional salutary effect—prevention of subsequent COVID-19 infections.

While it is too early to make therapeutic claims, there is no doubt that data on nattokinase is the most promising we have seen among all solutions reviewed to end the final stages of the pandemic crisis—long COVID, vaccine injury syndromes, and recurrent Omicron infections.

If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and your extended circles.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34271432/

Dr. McCullough - Roles of Bromelain and Curcumin in Battling Recurrent SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Exposures
Natural Products have Strong Rationale for Use Post-COVID-19 and Vaccine Syndromes
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™
Jun 16, 2023

https://substackcdn.com/video_upload/pos...scoded.mp3

I find it interesting that a large group of post-COVID-19 acute sequalae are occurring in those who have taken failed COVID-19 vaccines. We are a long way off from definitive clinical trials of multidrug strategies for patients who have had multiple exposures to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein via vaccination or recurrent COVID-19.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...8x1328.png

Kritis et al point out: “ Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) is a natural phenol found in turmeric (Curcuma longa), a member of the ginger family of plants [4]. Curcumin modulates inflammation preventing the subsequent cytokine storm by inhibiting multiple transcription factors such as nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT-3), and downregulating the proinflammatory cytokines, as this has been demonstrated in human macrophages after influenza virus infection [4,6]. Additionally, curcumin inhibits ACE modulating angiotensin II synthesis and downregulating inflammation, while it also promotes fibrinolysis and the anticoagulation process [4,6,7] (Fig. 1). The antiviral actions of curcumin against multiple viruses (influenza and hepatitis viruses, herpes viruses, human papilloma virus, human immunodeficiency virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and other coronaviruses), bacteria and fungi have been established by experimental evidence [8]. Remarkably, recent evidence from in silico studies has demonstrated that curcumin prevents SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells by blocking the viral binding sites and the cell ligands (spike protein, ACE-2 receptors and basigin), downregulating trans-membrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS-2), and by interfering with viral replication through the interaction with various viral proteins [4]. However, the minimal absorption of curcumin following oral administration presents a major limitation in its bioavailability [6].

Bromelain is a cysteine protease, isolated from the pineapple stem (Ananas comosus) [9]. Traditionally, it has been used for its anti-inflammatory and healing effects in cases of arthritis and injury, while it has been approved in Europe for the debridement of burn wounds. Experimental studies have demonstrated that bromelain presents unique immunomodulatory actions: 1) downregulation of the pro-inflammatory prostaglandin E
2 (PGE-2) through inhibition of NF-kB and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2); 2)upregulation of the anti-inflammatory PGE-1; 3) activation of inflammatory mediators (interleukin 1b, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-a and interferon-g) as an acute response to cellular stress, but also inhibition of inflammatory mediators in states of overt cytokine production; 4) modulation of T cell responses in vitro and in vivo; and 5) enhancement of T-cell dependent antigenspecific B cell antibody responses [5,10e14]. Importantly, bromelain exerts dose-dependent anticoagulant effects: 1) downregulation of PGE-2 and thromboxane A2 (TXA2), thus leading to relative excess of prostacyclin; 2) promotion of fibrinolysis by stimulating the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin and prevention of platelet aggregation. Bromelain also hydrolyzes bradykinin and reduces kininogen and bradykinin levels in serum and tissues, improving inflammation and edema as shown in animal studies [15]. Notably, the latter action supports a potential role of bromelain in alleviating COVID-19 symptoms such as cough, fever and pain, and the more serious implications of inflammation, thrombosis and edema. The effect of bromelain on PGE-2 inhibition exceeds that of prednisone and aspirin, presenting very low toxicity and no major side effects. Interestingly, a recent experimental study demonstrated that bromelain inhibits infection of VeroE6 cells by SARS-CoV-2 through blocking the virus binding and entry into cells via downregulation of ACE-2 and TMPRSS2 expression, and cleavage of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, presenting a novel promising therapeutic option that warrants further investigation.

In summary, the combination of curcumin and bromelain are well positioned as supplements in people who are getting repetitive COVID-19/Spike protein exposure. Future randomized trials will elucidate the clinical benefits in specific applications.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7661945/

Nattokinase in the Prevention and Treatment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Human Data Promising as Supplement Widely Used in Post COVID-19 and Vaccine Injury Syndromes

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

Approximately 15% of Americans who took a COVID-19 vaccine have some new medical illness and regret the shot. Many are looking to nattokinase in formulations of Spike protein support supplements asking is it safe, and what is the track record for this Asian discovery?

Chen et al reviewed human studies before the pandemic on the use of nattokinase with this introduction: “Natto, a cheese-like food made of soybeans fermented with Bacillus subtilis, has been consumed as a traditional food in Asian countries for more than 2000 years. Natto consumption is believed to be a significant contributor to the longevity of the Japanese population. Recent studies demonstrated that a high natto intake was associated with decreased risk of total CVD mortality and, in particular, a decreased risk of mortality from ischaemic heart diseases. Before the 1980s, very little was known about the mechanism by which natto consumption led to overall cardiovascular health. In 1987, Sumi et al discovered that natto contained a potent fibrinolytic enzyme called nattokinase (NK). Since then, a considerable amount of NK research has been performed on NK in Japan, Korea, China, and the United States, and these studies confirmed that NK, an alkaline protease of 275 amino acid residues with a molecular weight of approximately 28 kDa, is the most active ingredient of natto and is responsible for many favourable effects on cardiovascular health. First, NK has potent fibrinolytic/antithrombotic activity. In addition, in both animal and human studies, NK also has an antihypertensive, anti-atherosclerotic, lipid-lowering, antiplatelet/anticoagulant, and neuroprotective actions…The most unique feature of NK is that, as a single compound, it possesses multiple CVD preventative and alleviating pharmacologic effects (namely, antithrombotic, antihypertensive, anticoagulant, anti-atherosclerotic, and neuroprotective effects). There are no other drugs or drug candidates with multiple pharmacologic properties similar to NK. In addition, NK is a natural product that can be administered orally, has a proven safety profile, is economical to use, and provides distinct advantages over other pharmaceutical products.”

In drug development, the most important early observations are on safety. There are two units used in nattokinase dosing, e.g. 100 mg=2000 fibrinolytic units (FU). In the table, Lampe et al in 2016 tested nattokinase up to 10 mg/kg/day (~160,000 FU for an 80 kg person). That means in doses of 100 mg or 2000 FU twice a day are well within a safety range to avoid significant toxicities.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...3x2234.png

In summary this review is reassuring that the ever increasing use of nattokinase in post-COVID-19 and after COVID-19 vaccine injuries is safe and reasonably well tolerated. There may be additional benefits on the cardiovascular system. There is a pressing need for continued clinical development for the COVID-19 and cardiovascular indications. Patients wanting to use the supplement ahead of the emerging science should discuss with a knowledgeable healthcare professional and be on alert for intolerances, allergic reactions, or bleeding complications.

If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and your extended circles.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6043915/

https://www.twc.health/collections/covid...ul-formula

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p...ention-and

Prescription and Over-the-Counter Treatments for Post-COVID Syndrome
Long List of Possibilities with Early Data Published

Over three years into the pandemic with nearly the entire country having become sick with SARS-CoV-2, a virus engineered to invade the body, there are millions suffering with long-hauler syndrome. Approximately half of patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 will have post-COVID syndrome which is now understood to be due to persistence of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein within cells, tissues, and organs. Those vaccinated have been additionally loaded with Spike, so may have even a worse course with prolonged symptoms including fatigue, lethargy, brain fog, muscle loss, skin and hair changes, sleeplessness, and effort intolerance. The magnitude of the problem has driven an all-encompassing search for management strategies to resolve the syndrome(s).

Hope is on the horizon with a preprint paper published by Halma et al summarizing the prescription drug and over-the-counter candidates for therapy. In my practice, I stylize the approach based on the patient and how recent the COVID-19 infection was in their history. If there are lingering signs of infection, then a course of full dose ivermectin can be considered. Aspirin is reasonable given increased rates of heart attack and stroke after the illness. I have found the colchicine appears to have an important role in pleurodynia or chest wall discomfort. Additionally it is used with corticosteroids in vaccine-induced myopericarditis. Low-dose naltrexone has been reported to ameliorate fatigue and inanition. Metformin has supportive data and would be appropriate in pre-diabetes and those with diabetes mellitus.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...4x2206.png

From the OTC list, I have found nattokinase, the Japanese product derived from natto (a traditional Japanese food made from whole soybeans that have been fermented with Bacillus subtilis var. natto.) to be the most compelling and scientifically supported approach to clear Spike protein out of the body via proteolytic degradation. A host of cellular protective, anti-oxidant approaches are listed with vitamin C and NAC being readily available and widely used.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...0x1473.png

Halma, M.T.; Plothe, C.; Lawrie, T. Strategies for the Management of Spike Protein-Related Pathology. Preprints 2023, 2023030344. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0344.v1.

Patients should push their doctors to refer them to clinical trials, and when that is not feasible, then empiric therapy can be pursued. It is important to realize that in the absence of completed large randomized placebo controlled randomized trials, which are easily 5 or more years away in the future, no therapeutic claims can be made. In the meantime we must be perceptive as patients and open-minded as clinicians to come up with reasonable approaches that can be used to help those sick now with post-COVID syndromes.

If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and your extended circles.

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202303.0344/v1

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p...he-counter

Which Virus Will Cause the Next Pandemic?
Experts Predict Virus Will Be Airborne--Narrows Field Considerably
We are constantly being barraged by fear-mongering messages about a “next pandemic” as if new global catastrophes have been put on a schedule. I have remarked that it would be quite difficult to anticipate an organism arriving from nature and afflicting the entire world’s population of any mammal, let alone man.

Neumann and Kawaoka published a review of past pandemics, a broad list of viral threats, and then indicated that the likely winner would be a zoonosis (virus that jumped from a bat or rodent) to a human. Additionally, for human to human spread it would need to be airborne and highly contagious. We learned with the fizzled Monkeypox scare that homo- bi-sexual transmission from man to man was not enough the scare the world into mass vaccination or hold the public captive very long in the news cycle. President Biden dropped the US Monkeypox Emergency in January 31, 2023 with no press release.

The list of possibilities for future pandemics is listed in the table. Most have no antiviral therapy that is specific, however, the authors fail to mention viricidal nasal sprays/gargles, vitamin D, curcumin, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, favipiravir, famotidine, or other agents to mitigate viral specific inflammation such as maraviroc and nonspecific agents including corticosteroids and colchicine.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...8x1328.png

The authors outline these steps to get ready: “To prepare for future pandemics, the international research community needs to continue and further strengthen research efforts in various areas, including the following: (i) cataloging the landscape and animal reservoirs of (human-infecting) viruses through surveillance and metagenomics; (ii) development of animal models for viruses that may cause pandemics; (iii) basic research to better understand the molecular virology of such viruses; (iv) early stage vaccine development and testing in animal models; and (v) development of broad antivirals as a first line of defense. The US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases has suggested that prototype pathogens (selected from virus families that may cause pandemics) be selected for basic research and early stage development of countermeasures. With reasonable resources and advanced technologies, the global community could be much better prepared for future pandemics.

I am cautious about the terms “animal models” “prototype pathogens” “vaccine” or “countermeasure” as these were the words used by the NIH, HHS, and the Cares Act disastrous COVID-19 pandemic response. I suggest we focus on readiness with an arsenal of nasal viricidal washes and gargles to PREVENT the upper respiratory illness as the main measure of contagion control. Solutions of dilute iodine, hydrogen peroxide, xylitol, colloidal silver, and other compounds alone or in combination should serve well for any of the viral threats listed.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...94x700.png

From the authors (v) “broad antivirals” with adjunctive treatment will be the next line of defense since they will be readily available, scalable, and far more important to large numbers of sick patients instead of vaccines for well persons.

If you find “Courageous Discourse” enjoyable and useful to your endeavors, please subscribe as a paying or founder member to support our efforts in helping you engage in these discussions with family, friends, and your extended circles.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p...t-pandemic

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e...oncept.jpg

AI Now Overriding Decisions Made By Human Care Nurses At Hospitals
NaturalNews.com  |  Ethan Huff

(Natural News) Actual human beings are getting phased out of health care in exchange for artificial intelligence (AI) robots that are now reportedly overruling nurses at hospitals.

The life-or-death decisions that have long been made by real people at health care facilities are now being made by computers that have been programmed with who-knows-what to do God-only-knows to patients.

One oncology nurse by the name of Melissa Beebe who relies on her observational skills to help patients in need of emergency care spoke with The Wall Street Journal about the changes she is seeing in the way care is administered due to the AI infiltration.

“I’ve been working with cancer patients for 15 years so I know a septic patient when I see one,” Beebe said about an alert she recently received in the oncology unit at UC Davis Medical Center in California that she knew was wrong. “I knew this patient wasn’t septic.”

The alert Beebe received had been created by AI based on an elevated white blood cell count it observed in said patient, which it correlated with a septic infection. What the AI system failed to recognize is that the patient in question also had leukemia, which can also cause similar elevated white blood cell counts.

“The algorithm, which was based on artificial intelligence, triggers the alert when it detects patterns that match previous patients with sepsis,” the Journal reported. “The algorithm didn’t explain its decision.”

(Related: If leftists are able to program the ChatGPT AI robot into promoting anti-white hate, can the same thing be done to the AI robots that are in charge of people’s medical care at hospitals?)

Being admitted to a hospital in the age of AI is a recipe for early death

The rules at the hospital where Beebe works stipulate that she and all other nurses must follow certain protocols whenever a patient is flagged for sepsis – even if the flag is a mistake based on wrong assumptions made by AI.

The only way to override the AI’s decision is to get a doctor to approve – though if the modified decision ends up being wrong, then nurses can face disciplinary action. The threat of this causes most of them to simply follow orders, even when they know those orders are wrong.

“When an algorithm says, ‘Your patient looks septic,’ I can’t know why,” Beebe, a representative of the California Nurses Association, says. “I just have to do it.”

“I’m not demonizing technology,” she added while noting that, in the case of the aforementioned cancer patient, she was right and the AI was wrong. “But I feel moral distress when I know the right thing to do and I can’t do it.”

While there are arguably some things that AI can maybe, possibly do better than a human being, relying on AI systems to control the direction of medicine and care at hospitals is dangerous business.

Who is to say that the AI machines will not suddenly start targeting certain patients for early elimination if their names come up on a government-created “agitator” list, as one hypothetical dystopian outcome? What about when the AI machines are just plain wrong and hospital staff are too tired, ambivalent, or even apathetic to try to override it and risk their own careers in the process?

“AI should be used as clinical decision support and not to replace the expert,” warns Kenrick Cato, a professor of nursing at the University of Pennsylvania and a nurse scientist at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.”

“Hospital administrators need to understand there are lots of things an algorithm can’t see in a clinical setting.”

The AI takeover of the world is perhaps the biggest threat to civilization besides globalism.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-06-19-a...itals.html

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e...puppet.jpg

Overthrow Of The World By Infiltration
How the path was cleared for the agenda of world domination

David Sorensen | Stop World Control 

In the previous post I explained how one fourth of humanity, meaning the Christian Church, has been strategically infiltrated by the cabal in the 19th century, with the purpose of turning Christianity from a victorious movement that transforms the world for the better, into a powerless group of people that wait for an escape.

Understandably many believers find this hard to accept, as hearing it for the first time is similar to the shock we experienced when we found out how the pandemic was planned, vaccines kill off humanity, the news media lie to us, and governments abuse us in the most horrendous ways.

It is always difficult to find out that something we believed to be true proves to be false, or authorities we trusted, turn out to be corrupt.

Our first reaction is often denial, because the shock of the truth is simply too painful. We all experience this at some point. It is called “cognitive dissonance” or the “Semmelweis effect”. New information is rejected, when it challenges our existing beliefs. We need time to process it.
Overthrow the world by infiltration

What we have to realize, is that every aspect of human society has been infiltrated by the cabal. Infiltration is they primary method used to overthrow the world. They position their leaders in the fields of medicine, education, politics, news media, religion, etc.

The Church hasn’t been spared from this, on the contrary: they have focused more on the Church than on anything else, because the children of God are their #1 opponent.

For centuries the Church had no concept of a rapture to escape the world, and leave humanity behind to be tortured by demons. Historically Christianity always was the most powerful force of transformation on earth. Everywhere the first Christians came, they abolished slavery, ended public human sacrifice, cancelled oppression of the poor, built orphanages and established healthcare for all, and so on.

They established medicine, science, education, elections, and so much more.

It’s thanks to the Christians that the world increasingly became a better place. Before, every nation of the world was marked by demon worship, slavery, human sacrifice, sorcery, and all kinds of horrors. Christianity changed all of that, until virtually everyone in the civilized nations had an understanding of a loving God, who wants us to love one another. Before Christianity, this idea didn’t exist, and it was the survival of the fittest everywhere, plus cruel demon worship and human sacrifice, in Asia, Africa, Europe, the America’s, everywhere.

The entire world used to be one horrible hell, before the message of Christ began transforming the nations.

So when the cabal developed a plan to rule the world, they knew they had to first of all get rid of this powerful force of the Church. No better way to do so than by infiltration, and convince them that their own Bible tells them they must allow evil to reign, and wait for a rapture. So that’s what they did: not a visible external attack, but a covert operation from within.

Specific verses in the Bible were mistranslated, taken out of context, and misused to promote this brand new doctrine.

The doctrine of a rapture was forced upon the minds of hundreds of millions of people by very strong mind control methods, used by the cabal, who positioned many of the so called “powerful Christian leaders”. They also promoted international movie productions and popular book series, to further spread this concept. Meanwhile they shut down all opposing voices. Renown theologians who exposed the dark lies of the rapture where silenced, in the same way physicians and scientists are silenced in the fields of medicine.

This is how they always work: push one single storyline onto everyone, while silencing all opposing voices.

I spent many years investigating this, and summarized my findings from Scripture and history in a highly revealing report, that you can find at the end of this post. I invite all who have courage and love for truth, to read this report, as it will answer many questions, and highlight what Christ truly said about this topic.

But first I want to give you some keys that can unlock your mind for the truth.
Keys to unlock your mind
to the truth

God created us to be kings who reign with Him to expel evil, not cowards who flee from evil.

God created us to be heroes who save humanity, not traitors who betray humanity.

God created us to be victors who overcome opposition, not losers who give up when we face hardship.

God calls us to love people, not leave them behind.

God calls us to care for the poor, not abandon them.

God calls us to end corruption, not allow it to rule.

God calls us to slay giants, not run from them.

Christ called us to be the light of the world, not leave the world in darkness.

Christ said we will reign with Him on the throne, not allow evil to reign.

David didn’t run from the giant Goliath, he ran towards him and killed him.

I can go on like this for a long time... The doctrine of the rapture has turned every aspect of the Bible upside down, inside out and the other way around. It has turned victors into losers, conquerors into cowards, kings into slaves, world changers into escapists, an army into a social club, visionaries into blind leaders.
Crippling the billions of Christians worldwide

Nothing crippled the Church more than the rapture doctrine. It was strategically done in order to prepare the way for the agenda of world domination of the elites. If they could convince billions of Christians that the agenda for world domination is the “fulfillment of Bible prophecy”, and is therefore inevitable, they would have cancelled the resistance from these billions of believers. It’s a very clever strategy.

Millions of Christians read the books, see the movies, and don’t understand how the Bible is abused, with verses that are quoted out of context, and words that are mistranslated to push this escapist theology upon the Church.

But as with all deception, there is always the clear voice of truth calling the people to make a choice.

Will we be like Christ, who gave His life to heal, save and restore humanity? Or will we be like Satan, who tells us to leave humanity in the claws of evil?

Will we ignore the cries of suffering people and look for an easy escape? Or will we have a heart of compassion to help those in need?

Will we run from the giants, or shall we run towards them to take them down?

The choice is ours.

https://stopworldcontrol.com/infiltration/

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e....52-PM.png

A Preview Of The Brave New World • The Great Reset Is Almost Here, Are You Prepared?
Global Research  |  Brandon Smith

I want you to imagine, for a moment, a future world in which everything we now know about functioning and surviving within the economy is completely upended. This world has gone fully digital, meaning people live within a cashless society where physical monetary interactions are abandoned or prohibited, replaced by CBDCs.  All transactions are tracked and traced, nothing is private any longer unless you are operating as a criminal within a black market.

Furthermore, government overtly suppresses and micromanages all forms of production. Small businesses are a thing of the past, and only a select group of major corporations working directly with government are allowed to operate.

It’s not just that cash is outlawed and that everyone must rely on a digital ledger, but that government owns the very data pathways and networks we use to transfer funds – the plumbing of the global financial system itself. Much like the SWIFT data network, the globalists have the ability to lock down individual or business accounts. Deny owners access to their funds completely.

In the meantime, AI-based monitoring systems sift through billions of transactions every minute, searching for “anomalies.” The algorithm is designed to identify anyone who wants to remain anonymous.

The internet still exists, but it is a shell of its former self. The population uses it regularly to complete assigned tasks and to access approved research databases. Data providers are severely censored. Cryptocurrencies are not an alternative to CBDCs because any attempt to buy or sell them immediately sets off red flags for the AI watchdog.

Only government approved websites are allowed to exist, with extensive rules limiting what they can do and what they can say. AI chatbots provide the public with most of their data, and the globalists control the parameters of the chatbots. People are only ever exposed to the information that the elites want them to hear. All contrary data is eliminated. It’s not so much banned; rather, it is simply omitted from the record until the people who remember it are gone.
A preview of the brave new world


It might sound like science fiction, but every element of this technology already exists and is currently in testing at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Not long ago, during the Covid pandemic panic, organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF) began widely promoting a concept called the Great Reset. A new economic paradigm, a revolution in which AI runs everything, humanity is relegated to a limited number of government-issued “vital” jobs, and a new brand of technological socialism rules our lives.

Private property would be cast aside. Citizens would live day-to-day within a “shared economy” in which no one owns anything because everything is borrowed from the collective system on a daily basis. There’s no opportunity for most to acquire wealth, or to store it. There’s no provision for preparing for future needs or crises. The state plans for you, Citizen!

Human beings essentially cease to become active participants in their own lives. Instead, they’re managed en masse by technocratic overlords who live far away in high towers.
“You will own nothing” means “We will own everything”


The Great Reset, or the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” as they sometimes call it, would be the start of a new terrifying age of feudalism. It’s a return to the oligarch and peasant model, a return to enslavement. The average person would only be allowed to work as a means to survive, never to accumulate wealth for the future.

The primary stepping-stone to this dystopian nightmare would be a global digital currency system. Without a cashless society, the globalists would have no power to enforce the other elements of their Reset.

But when and how will they implement this monstrosity, and why would anyone embrace it?

Globalists tend to operate in stages of incrementalism, but sometimes they exploit dramatic crisis events to frighten the population into compliance with policies that would have taken decades to institute otherwise. “Never let a crisis go to waste.”

We saw this clearly with the pandemic; most of the Reset concepts were openly admitted during this time, perhaps because the globalists thought they had it in the bag and there was nothing anyone could do to stop them. This included ample talk of cashless systems to [pretent to] prevent the spread of Covid [flu renamed] on physical dollars.

You know, the same way germ-laden cash spread the Black Death across Europe in the 1400s. Or filthy greenbacks passed Spanish flu from shopper to cashier back in 1918… Of course, the only way to end those plagues was to burn all the money, right?

Nonsense. The Covid window slammed shut – the crisis was wasted.

Today, we must ask, when will they try again?

Fortunately, they’ve actually told us…

Most globalist organizations consistently mention the year 2030 as their timeline for finishing the numerous projects they have in place.  Not just the “Great Reset” and numerous climate and carbon taxation goals. The WEF calls it a social contract to transform our world by 2030. The United Nations simply calls it Agenda 2030.

That’s not ominous at all, is it?

This tells us they want their control grid in place within seven years or less. That would be impossible without a bone rattling crisis of epic proportions. First, though, they’d have to introduce some of the elements of their master plan early, as a trial run. That way, when disaster does occur, the public will be aware of the “solutions” the elites already prepared with crisis in mind.

This process is under way right now.

In the case of digital currencies, crypto has already received wide exposure in popular media. Most people don’t own crypto and most who do don’t use it daily – but everyone has heard of it. CBDCs will be sold as a “safer and more stable” cryptocurrency, Uncle Sam’s bitcoin.

Right now, Australia is the test bed for fielding CBDCs to a national population. Their pilot programs are set to finish this summer and international transactions have been accomplished using the newly-invented “eAUD” currency. Now, of course they haven’t yet revealed a schedule to introduce the eAUD to foreign exchange markets or even to Australian citizens. The point is, the system exists, and can be copied and pasted by any other nation.

It really is that simple.

Even the most deluded globalist knows a few nations including America will never accept a cashless society without a complete collapse of both their currency and their economy. It’s just not going to happen otherwise.

I doubt many Americans would line up to accept such a dehumanizing and enslaving currency even after a total economic collapse.

In other words, only a full-spectrum crisis through the U.S. and the western world could possibly lead to a willing acceptance of CDBCs… A few years of “reconstruction,” a few dozen million homeless and starving in refugee camps would likely serve as the crisis needed. The globalist cashless “solutions” would follow.

If we take the globalist date of 2030 as a milestone, we can expect another crisis even more oppressive, pervasive and destructive of our liberties than the Covid pandemic — in the next 3-4 years.  In order for the elites to get what they want, they need a 1-2-year crisis and a 1-2 year “reconstruction” and I’m certain “reeducation” period. After this, the change would be irreversible.

The longer the globalists wait, the more people become educated on their agenda and the less likely it will be to succeed.

Take steps now to insulate yourself and your family from the socialists’ end game. Make certain you have untrackable, uninflatable and totally anonymous stores of wealth (necessities like food and water for survival, barter goods for trade and physical gold and silver for everything else). When you depend on them for your very necessities, they have you right where they want you.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/great-rese...ed/5823110

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e...1_1920.jpg

Transgenesis of Man
Rosanne Lindsay, Naturopath

    Transgenesis – the uncontrolled transfer of foreign DNA into the germline of an animal species. – Molecular Basis of Cardiovascular Disease (Second Edition), 2004

The Transhumanist Age

Nowhere does the Transhumanist Age show its cold, shiny glare than through the cloning of genetically modified animal species. But why stop there? From nano-biotech to frequency-technologies, the biological human is turning into a Cyborg.

    Cyborg:  a being with both organic and biomechatronic body parts. It applies to an organism that has enhanced abilities due to the integration of some artificial component or technology that relies on some sort of feedback to support group, or collective intelligence.

The Cyborg evolution is popularized in films such as Immortals, Terminator, and SheBorg. This multi-trillion dollar agenda operates under the financial influence of government in collaboration with leading global intelligence agencies.

Transgenesis is a transformation in human society that harkens back to the destruction of Atlantis. Modern science says transgenesis began in 1977 when Herbert Boyer and Stanley Cohen first transferred E. coli genes from one organism to another. Then came synthetic insulin, or Humulin, in 1982. Today, Humulin is reengineered for “integrity.” The sordid history of cloning DNA transgenes is Transgenesis.

Thus, Transhumanism is an introduction to the concepts of post-humanism, and of immortality. It is a transition from Human to Artificial Intelligence (A.I.).  A transmutation from emotion to emotionless, from Identity to loss of Identity, and from the Universe to the Metaverse.

Fortunately, Posthumanism is not yet a thing, since humans are not yet a thing of the past.
Hiding in Plain Sight

The transgenesis of humanity is hiding in plain sight. The development and deployment of injectable nanotechnologies not only target human DNA, but also human microbes, and human minds. The purpose of vaccine nanotechnology is gene therapy. Once injected inside the body, nanobots are self-replicating based on the use of plasmid DNA.

As thoughts are planted in the psyche through predictive programming, and then accepted as normal across the human collective, these collective thoughts determine what makes up the future. That’s because thoughts are things. The mind is influential.  As such, thoughts are seeds, one step away from sprouting a reality near you.

From graphene to hydrogels, to graphene-hydrogel combinations, all inorganic, nanotechnologies are made to be directly injected into organic organisms for the purpose of cellular transmutation. Add to this, frequency technologies, and the human body becomes a walking, talking battery-magnet for energy storage and ongoing manipulation by the nano biotech industry leaders.

Where are the medical ethics discussions for eugenics programs that protect human health? What about the Precautionary Principle against slave-making?

These ideas are long buried in PDF files on the internet going back a decade. They are described as “guidelines,” and “theories.” By design, there are never concrete boundaries, especially when talking about “progress” in the material mainstream.

Protection of biotech vaccine technologies can be traced to the 2016 National Biodefense Strategy Act. Because this Act still lingers as Senate bill, S2967, in Congress, it could be altered to include the many new concepts being hatched in the mammalian transgenesis business model.
Image by <a href="https://pixabay.com/users/thor_deichmann-2306827/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=1767183">Thor Deichmann</a> from <a href="https://pixabay.com//?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=1767183">Pixabay</a>

Who’s Who Of Trans BioTech

1). self-amplifying mRNA vaccines (aka DNA vaccines) and shedding via breakthrough infections Ex: VARIVAX package insert

    Due to the concern for transmission of vaccine virus, vaccine recipients should attempt to avoid whenever possible close association with susceptible high-risk individuals for up to six weeks following vaccination with VARIVAX.

2.) monoclonal antibody injections (RelCoVax, and Novovax)

3). implantable and transcutaneous hydrogel biosensors

4). 3-D microarray transdermal patches (Luciferase)  [See photos of hydrogel]

5). whole parasite vaccines (See Hybrid insects program under DARPA)

6). nasal swab drug delivery vaccine tech

7). genetically modified bacteria for vaccine production

8). CRISPR RNA gene-edited plants, animals, and Human Germline geome editing (not regulated as GMO)

    Gene-edited sheep and goats, generated using these tools, provide valuable models for investigations on gene functions, improving animal breeding, producing pharmaceuticals in milk, improving animal disease resistance, recapitulating human diseases, and providing hosts for the growth of human organs. – Frontiers in Genetics, 2019

9) biometric digital IDs for Central Bank Digital Currencies
Creating GMO Bacteria

    Advances in synthetic biology enable the precise manipulation of bacteria for diverse purposes. –Pharmacological Research, 2017

Image by <a href="https://pixabay.com/users/victoria_regen-6314823/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=7090995">Victoria_Regen</a> from <a href="https://pixabay.com//?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=7090995">Pixabay</a>

Researchers claim they seek GMO transparency. But such a concept is too little and too late, since DNA is now being cloned and chemically synthesized using bacteria.

Food products from GMO bacteria are commonly used in Industrial food enzyme production, animal food and medical substances. Biotechnological drug manufacturing, relying on GMO bacteria, such as Escherichia coli and the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia pastoris, is an industry standard.

It is common knowledge that GMO crops create antibiotic-resistant super bacteria. Further, GMO crops (Bt) are still failing to increase crop yields after promises made decades ago.

Genetically engineered bacterial vaccines are now available for polio, tuberculosis (T.B.), and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. It is also known that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines contain excessive quantities of bacterial DNA.

    A DNA copy of the gene for the spike protein is inserted into a bacterial plasmid. This is a ring-shaped, double-stranded DNA molecule which can exist in a bacterial cell independently of the cell’s own chromosomal DNA, and which can also be copied and passed on to both daughter cells when that cell divides. – Doctors4CovidEthics.org

Scientists are always looking for new ways to manipulate and modify bacteria. In 2020, scientists created Franken Bacteria programmed to produce living concrete.

Remember, bacteria outnumber human cells by 10:1. Bacteria make up the human body’s many microbiomes, including gut, skin, lymphatic, brain, etc. As human beings, connected to Nature, it makes sense that our multiple microbiomes resemble the diversity of Earth’s microbiomes.

What could go wrong by playing host to Franken bacteria that are unnatural to the body? After all, there is plenty of evidence showing that mosquitoes are genetically engineered and patented.

Unfortunately, transgenic mosquitoes did breed in the wild, despite a kill-switch gene. The result? Contamination of the natural mosquito population. In 2018, all attempts to control the Franken mosquitoes in Nature failed, miserably. And still, another open-air release of GMO mosquitoes occurred in 2o22, as if it were the first time.

    The average attention span of the modern human being is about half as long as whatever you’re trying to tell them. – Meg Rosoff

Scientists have had to resort to using non-GMO bacteria to control mosquitoes. So far, the first trial has been a success. Non-GMO bacteria suppressed mosquitoes, but only if the bacteria and the mosquitoes are both non-GMO.

Score another for Nature!

While GMO mosquitoes have been bred for disease resistance for decades, Nature always has the last word.

Another man-ipulated mishap?

The 1998 Journal of Clinical Microbiology states that ticks and biting insects have been infected with the etiologic agent of Lyme disease, or Borellia bergdorferi. The CDC acknowledges that Lyme disease from multiple vectors is on the rise in the US, but offers no explanation and no solutions.
Creating Cancer

Whole Parasite Vaccines?  What could go wrong?

Tumors analyzed for pathology often show worms and parasites. Parasitic invasion by a nematode worm can be mistaken for cancer in women presenting with breast lumps.  [Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2011 Sep]. How are parasites described in the body?  According to 2006 research in Astrolos Radiol:

    “The larvae enter the lymphatic vessels of the mammary gland, causing lymphangitis, fibrosis, and disruption of lymphatic drainage.” In late, inactive phases, the larvae appear on mammography as serpiginous calcifications. – Rustagi V, El-Feky M, Knipe H, et al., “Breast filariasis.”

The information slowly worming its way out into the public, shows that parasitic infestations can represent “cancer.” All cancers are, in fact, parasitic infections (with high levels of candida), even if not all parasitic infections present as cancer. Parasitic worms cause cancer. which represents an acidic tissue environment, perfect for parasites.

It is no secret that the American Cancer Society knows that cancer reflects parasitic infections. Even the CDC publishes the fact on their website that cases or parasitic infections are misdiagnosed as cancer.

    Scientists at the CDC have discovered cancer cells originating in a common tapeworm may take root in people with weakened immune systems, causing cancer-like tumors. The report, in the Nov. 5 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, raises concern that other similar cases, if they occur, may be misdiagnosed as human cancer.

Just Add Frequencies
Image by <a href="https://pixabay.com/users/geralt-9301/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=567755">Gerd Altmann</a> from <a href="https://pixabay.com//?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=567755">Pixabay</a>

If the growing list of injectable trans nanotech is not enough by itself, just add frequencies.

Injectable nanobots are designed to work with frequency technologies, by design. Nanobots self-assemble in the body under programmed commands.  They have similarities to electrolysis rods used in batteries as well as biosensing devices.  Compare this to “self-driving” cars. Are you really in control? Are you hackable?

The direct effects of using “frequency therapeutics” mean negative health effects to the nervous system and brain receptors, hormone receptors, and all cell receptors in between. This is not limited to only a physical level. Got ringing in the ears?

For instance, an Editorial published and retracted in the July 2020 J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, suggested the creation of COVID symptoms within cells using 5G frequencies. You can read it here, in full: “5G Technology and induction of coronavirus in skin cells.”
Sound Science

Sound, or frequency, medicine is the core of homeopathic medicine.  There is evidence of efficacy in clinical studies of Homeopathy, but much of it has been suppressed or buried.

Australia’s NHMRC did a homeopathy review, twice. One report was released in July 2012, and one was released to the public in March 2015. The existence of the first report was not disclosed to the public – it was only discovered through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests. The second report published in 2015 was based on a “rigorous assessment of over 1800 studies.”

Unfortunately, the Homeopathy report was buried and the NHMRC’s final government report claimed, “no reliable evidence from research in humans that homeopathy was effective for treating the range of health conditions considered.” The Smithsonian also attempted to disqualify the results.  In other news, Australia recently opened its first needle-free patch vaccine patch facility.

    It’s human responsibility… If I have the education and the ability to see something alarming and a threat to all humanity. There is no way out.
    Always question what so-called experts tell you.
    Solidarity demands you step forward and come out when you see something going wrong.
    If I see a car heading for a child on the street, I have to do something. I cannot just turn my back and say bad luck.
    – Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt, Pathologist, investigator of COVID vaccine injuries and deaths

With all the focus on a material world, who is guarding the spiritual body? What happens when an organic human becomes inorganic?
Human Initiation & Steiner
Image by <a href="https://pixabay.com/users/kellepics-4893063/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=5174342">Stefan Keller</a> from <a href="https://pixabay.com//?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=5174342">Pixabay</a>

The transgenesis of the human species is upon us, complete with neural network hookup to the Metaverse. A connection to the Meta-Collective will provide “users” a new biometric digital ID to use digital currencies. Then, the transformation from human to cyborg will be complete.

Will humanity avoid a path that regresses the soul to a divergent timeline? Or is humanity ready to rise to a new level of Consciousness?

Is humanity doing the Cha Cha?

    One step forward and two steps back.

One thing is clear: Humanity is undergoing  a spiritual test, an initiation.

    Everything people do in this respect is under the influence of elemental spirits. They are always involved and helping us in this. People are not taking the initiative on their own in this field — they are guided. – Rudolf Steiner

Rudolf Steiner described this time of initiation as a bifurcation of Earth.
Image by <a href="https://pixabay.com/users/pexels-2286921/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=1866822">Pexels</a> from <a href="https://pixabay.com//?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=1866822">Pixabay</a>

Such initiations have been ongoing through the Ages, since humans first “fell” to Earth. To attend Earth School for soul lessons is to experience the “I” of Individuality, unique, but also connected to the Collective Consciousness.

Steiner suggests that the Ages are identified as Dark Ages and Light Ages for spiritual reasons. In a Dark Age, there is an inversion. Humans are tested on what was learned during the Light Age. Everything is dense during this “might-is-right” Dark Age, an Age that asks us to integrate, consolidate, push for transparency during corrupt times. The Darkness asks us to heal any trauma to anchor the soul in the body. It asks us to think independently.

As the Light Age comes, the Aquarian Age, a new Golden Age, density shifts. All the darkness rises to the surface.

Some Initiates are well known, and come with a message for all. They sacrifice themselves to raise Consciousness.

    The Kingdom of Heaven is Within – Christ Consciousness

Humanity does not evolve through hybridization and cloning. The idea that science can genetically manipulate humans into a higher form is the new Transhuman religion. A “religion without revelation.”

Still, the initiation cycle happens on an individual level, by your choice, and by your soul. All humans have a Higher Self to consult. As we each go through our lives, we face many spiritual challenges that shape the soul. As new frequencies are attained, the soul reaches a higher plane. Eventually, all souls “graduate” to reach a higher Consciousness.

    This will be an unpalatable truth for people who never tire of making great speeches on the tremendous advances made in modern civilization, for they see things in abstract terms and know nothing of the rise and fall which is part of human evolution. – Rudolf Steiner,

Image by <a href="https://pixabay.com/users/avi_acl-5075433/?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=2223129">Avi Chomotovski</a> from <a href="https://pixabay.com//?utm_source=link-attribution&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=image&utm_content=2223129">Pixabay</a>

For initiation purposes, humans can access higher dimensions through “guides” or higher spiritual beings. While some entities in the lower dimensions may connect at a psychic or a spiritual level, they cannot initiate humans. The initiation process happens only through the higher spheres of Earth.

Because humans are energy, that energy can be manipulated if they are not aware. Fortunately, there are things to do to protect your energy.

The challenge is to develop a spiritual practice, to be self-aware through meditation or prayer. And choose wisely.

https://www.activistpost.com/2023/06/tra...f-man.html

https://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/wp-c...60x386.png

Msgr. Viganò’s interview with Rossyia TV. The War, the U.S., the Churches.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMNbLnzCa_0

The Archbishop Viganò Archive:
May 15, 2023
Interview with Rossyia TV: Ukraine War, U.S., Churches

1. In your opinion, who and what provoked the religious conflict in Ukraine?

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò: First of all, allow me to thank Arkady Mamontov, Dr. Dmitry Toropov, and the editorial staff of Rossiya for inviting me to do this interview. I send my greetings to you and to all of your viewers.

We know, from an analysis of events, that the Ukrainian crisis has been planned for years, since before the Euromaidan. Obviously, the American deep state was no stranger to this regime change operation, accomplished through the State Department and the CIA.

Those who moved with such ease in interfering in the internal affairs of a sovereign state considered the religious question as instrumental to the internal destabilization of Ukraine, and to obtain it they moved on this front well in advance. So how could religious conflict be achieved? Simple: by making the Ukrainian Orthodox Church canonically separate from the Russian Church and considered autocephalous.

We know that in 2018 the US State Department allocated 25 million dollars to the Patriarch of Constantinople as an incentive for the recognition of the autocephaly of the Ukrainian Church in schism from the Russian Church, which Bartholomew granted in January 2019. At the time, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo – with interference in the internal affairs of the Orthodox Church – expressed US support for the Ukrainian Church.

2. Did the Patriarchate of Constantinople have the right to grant autocephaly to the unrecognized Orthodox Church of Ukraine despite the fact that there was already an Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate in Ukraine that gave pastoral care to the vast majority of Orthodox citizens of this country?

Archbishop Viganò: The question, in my opinion, is not whether the Patriarchate had the right to grant autocephaly, but why it did so. If I may draw a parallel with the Catholic Church, it seems to me that a similar operation was carried out by Jorge Mario Bergoglio with regard to the German Dioceses on the occasion of the recent Synod on Synodality. And he has created the premises of a schism by allowing the Dioceses an autonomy in doctrinal and moral matters that they do not and cannot have, and the Bishops of those Dioceses have approved the blessing of homosexual unions, the conferral of ministerial roles on women, and the legitimization of LGBTQ and gender ideology.

And now that some few Bishops are rising up against these deviations, the Holy See is silent, because this was exactly what it set out to do. We are witnessing a subversive plan, carried out by the one whom Christ has made Head of the Church in order to confirm his brothers in the Faith, not in order to spread heresy and vice. Does he have the right to do so? No. Do the German Bishops have this right? No. Because the authority of the Pope and the Bishops is bound to the Truth taught by Christ, and it is nothing as soon as it deviates from it. I believe that the Patriarch of Constantinople acted in the same way, with the same purposes and inspired by the same powers.

3. It’s no secret that all decisions in Kiev are made after consultations with the United States. Today we are witnessing how monks are being expelled from the Kiev Pechersk Lavra – don’t you think that this violates the principles of religious rights and freedoms that nations themselves defend?

Archbishop Viganò: The persecution of monks and clergy, as well as the faithful of the Russian Church by the Kiev government, shows that the operation is political in nature. On the other hand, as you yourself acknowledge, Kiev’s decisions are always taken following the instructions of the American deep state. If the question had been exclusively religious, the State should have stayed out of it, as should be the case in nations which call themselves “secular” and consider State and Church independent and sovereign.

If the Kiev government considers the Russian Church in Ukraine as an emanation of the Russian government, it also reveals the conviction that the Ukrainian Orthodox Church is itself a state church subservient to the government, and that for this reason it can play a role of control over the Ukrainian faithful. And this is what Beijing has done with the secret agreement with the Holy See, which appoints pro-government and communist bishops as head of the dioceses, continuing with impunity the persecution against the faithful of the Roman Catholic Church.

4. Criminal cases are being initiated against priests in Ukraine; some of them are being deprived of Ukrainian citizenship; parishes are being taken over by schismatics – what will this all lead us to?

Archbishop Viganò: These phenomena have always happened throughout history: when the civil power feels “threatened” by ecclesiastical power – I think, for example, of what happened during the French Revolution and again in 1848 in France and Italy, or in Stalin’s communist Russia, or in Mexico at the end of the twenties, or in Spain in the thirties – the persecution of the clergy is one of the first ways in which civil authority seeks to suppress dissent. On the other hand, Christians have always been persecuted by totalitarian regimes, because the Gospel is considered dangerous for those who want to replace the law of God with the law of men.

5. Could you name some church schisms that have occurred in the history of the Church, and what did they lead to?

Archbishop Viganò: I would cite the emblematic case of the Anglican schism, which arose not so much from a theological question as from the desire of Henry VIII to escape the spiritual authority of the Roman Pontiff and divorce his legitimate wife Catherine of Aragon. With this act of oppression of temporal power over spiritual power, the English sovereign declared himself “supreme head on earth of the Church of England,” with the advantage of appropriating the goods and revenues hitherto due to the Holy See and of controlling the appointments of Bishops.

A similar operation had taken place a few years earlier in Germany, where the German princes supported the heretic Martin Luther not so much because they shared his doctrinal errors, but because they saw in them a pretext to forfeit the goods of the Church. For both the Protestant pseudo-Reformation as well as for the Anglican schism, civil authority constituted itself as an ecclesiastical counterpart to the authority of the Pope and the Bishops, so as to weaken their power and strengthen their own.

6. Do secular authorities have the right to interfere in the affairs of the Church?

Archbishop Viganò: I answer with the words of Christ: Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s (Mt 22:21). This precept teaches us that civil and religious authority have two distinct and separate fields of action: on the one hand the good governance of the State for the harmony of citizens and on the other the government of the faithful for their sanctification. They are two distinct purposes – one temporal and one spiritual – but both authorities must still have Christ as their model: Christ the King for civil governments, and Christ the High Priest for the Church.

The Revolution – both that of Masonic liberalism as well as that of atheistic communism – has subverted this social order, and that is why for two centuries – and before that in Germany divided by Protestant heresy – secular authorities have interfered in Church affairs. This is due to having derived temporal power from the people, stealing it from Christ: on the one hand, deifying the individual (as liberal ideology wants) and on the other deifying the collective (as communist ideology wants).

Today we are witnessing the alliance between these two errors – which are theological, as well as philosophical and political – in the divinization of the synarchist elite of the New World Order, which combines liberal relativism and economic liberalism with socialist collectivism. And this infernal alliance – which in the West is destroying the social and religious fabric of nations – is necessarily anti-Christian and antichristic, because it denies Christ’s Lordship over individuals and societies. It is satanic, as President Vladmir Putin has recently pointed out.

7. Do US intelligence agencies try to control religious organizations?

Archbishop Viganò: I do not know the extent of the involvement of the Biden Administration and the secret service in Ukrainian religious affairs. We know instead, from John Podesta’s emails[1] published in recent years, that the American deep state played a decisive role in provoking a “colored revolution” within the Catholic Church, to the point of hoping for a change in doctrine and morals to be obtained through the replacement of Pope Benedict XVI with a progressive Pope.

You will recall that, on the eve of Pope Ratzinger’s abdication, the global financial lobby had blocked the Vatican’s banking transactions, and that immediately after February 12, 2013, the SWIFT system was reactivated. The action of the deep state was aided by the deep church, which, as admitted by the late Cardinal Godfried Danneels, then-Archbishop of Mechelen-Brussels, organized Bergoglio’s election by means of the so-called St. Gallen Mafia. Which, unlike Benedict XVI, is totally aligned with globalist ideology.

I would therefore not speak of an action of the United States, but of that corrupt and subversive part – which is called for brevity deep state – that has taken power in America and in almost all the nations belonging to NATO, the European Union, the WHO, and the World Economic Forum. And this same argument, in my view, also applies to Ukraine, whose corrupt regime – backed by clearly neo-Nazi extremist movements – has subjugated itself to the globalist elite for the sake of personal interests, while the Ukrainian people are being slaughtered on the front lines of a war that could have been avoided simply by enforcing the Minsk accords.

8. What guided Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople in granting autocephaly to the new church in Ukraine? We have a feeling that he was following the orders of the U.S. State Department or the CIA...

Archbishop Viganò: Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople is well known to be totally subservient to the design of the UN and the globalist elite: it is no coincidence that he is on excellent terms with Jorge Mario Bergoglio. We know well that the see of Constantinople has long been in the hands of Freemasonry: both Patriarch Athenagoras and his predecessor Meletios Metaxakis were awarded the 33rd degree of the Ancient Scottish and Accepted Masonic Rite, and in Masonic circles it has been repeatedly suggested that John XXIII was also affiliated with a Lodge when he was Apostolic Nuncio in Istanbul.

It does not surprise me, therefore, that Bartholomew, obeying the orders of the deep state– which controls the U.S. State Department and the CIA – may have recognized the autocephaly of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church not for canonical reasons but for political ones: for exactly the same reason that in 1964 Paul VI suppressed the Latin Patriarchate of Constantinople, which had been erected in 1205, in an ecumenical tone.

I remember that on November 3, 2009, then-American President Barack Obama met with Patriarch Bartholomew I, to talk about “environmental protection” and to promote the reopening of the ecumenical theological school of Halki, Turkey, after the failed attempts in the 1990s by Madeleine Albright and Bill Clinton.

If I have understood correctly the internal dynamics of Orthodoxy, the Russian Church constitutes, so to speak, the “traditionalist” part of the Orthodox structure, while that of Constantinople is “progressive,” infiltrated by Freemasonry, manipulated by the deep state and favorable to interreligious dialogue and even to environmentalist ideology: it seems to see the “Phanariot” version of Bergoglio’s Vatican.

I note that the ecumenical movement – aimed at preparing the advent of the Religion of Humanity desired by Freemasonry – began in the nineteenth century with the Protestants and as such was severely condemned by the Roman Pontiffs until the Second Vatican Council, and then expanded in the 1960s to the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church, making use of Freemasons infiltrated at the top of the respective Hierarchies. And when we talk about Freemasonry, we are talking about globalist elites and the New World Order.

9. What is your attitude towards the Special Military Operation?

Archbishop Viganò: I believe that each of us is able to understand what has happened in Ukraine in recent years, simply on the basis of the facts. It is a fact that NATO had undertaken not to expand eastwards. It is a fact that the Euromaidan revolution was conducted with the support of the American deep state, especially Victoria Nuland and other accomplices. It is a fact that the Minsk Protocol has not been respected, and we have heard prominent leaders such as former Chancellor Angela Merkel or former French President François Hollande admit that the purpose of that agreement was to give Ukraine time to arm itself.

It is a fact that on the eve of the special military operation the Russian Federation had asked to respect the independence of Lugansk and Donetsk, together with the autonomy of Donbass. If President Putin decided to defend Russian speakers from the repeated and continuous aggressions of the Kiev government, this did not happen suddenly. On the contrary, it seems clear to me that this was exactly what NATO wanted to achieve, after more than a decade of provocations.

10. Who, in your opinion, provoked the war in Ukraine?

Archbishop Viganò: The war in Ukraine has been planned since the “colored revolution” of 2014, to which even the self-styled philanthropist George Soros was no stranger, along with the entire globalist cabal. Those who wanted the war on the one hand had to replace the Russian Federation in the supply of energy to most European countries and then take over with an operation of scandalous speculation: the cost of gas, now supplied by the United States, is enormously higher than what it was sold for before February 2022.

But this was instrumental to two parallel objectives. The first was to prevent an alliance between the European nations and the Russian Federation, balkanizing it and trying to isolate it through regime change operations and through “colored springs,” as happened in Ukraine and as they tried to do in Georgia. This first objective has failed, as has the attempt to bring down President Putin. On the contrary, we are witnessing the establishment of a multipolar world, for example with the BRICS, in which de-dollarization is putting the United States in the corner. But this process should not, in my opinion, make the American people pay for the guilt of a subversive government subservient to the globalist elite.

The second objective had to be the destruction of the economic fabric of Europe – not only in an anti-Russian key – to allow the sanctions to backfire first of all against the countries of the European Union, weakening them and forcing them to the so-called green transition, based on climate change fraud. But to achieve this, after the dress rehearsal with the pandemic farce of the previous two years, there had to be a deep state puppet in the White House, and it was therefore necessary to oust President Donald Trump with electoral fraud. Among other things, Joe Biden, being blackmailed because of his and his son’s scandals, had every interest in hiding his involvement in Ukrainian biolaboratories and perhaps also in the horrors of child trafficking to feed the international lobby of pedophiles, organ predation and the lucrative surrogacy market.

This was possible thanks to a real global coup d’état, conducted with the cooperation of many governments, whose leaders are significant emissaries of the World Economic Forum and other supranational private entities, all managed by a clearly identifiable set of bosses made up of subversives without popular legitimacy, with the support of equally identifiable financial groups.

The Western peoples – with very rare exceptions – are hostages of rulers sold out to the globalist elite, which aims to establish a totalitarian synarchy that preludes the establishment of the reign of the Antichrist. From this we also understand hatred of God, of religion, of the family, and of life.

11. You previously served in the US. What is your impression of this country?

Archbishop Viganò: America is a relatively young nation, if we compare her with the millennia of history of other nations. This implies both a positive and a negative aspect. The positive aspect is that there is a certain simplicity in the conscience of the people, which is and remains essentially anchored to traditional “values” – I would not call them “principles” – Family, Faith, and Patriotism. The negative aspect is that the absence of solid spiritual and cultural inheritance is a void that is often filled with a non-identitarian thought that is often inclined to allow itself to be contaminated by the liberal and Masonic ideology that dominates the ruling classes and in particular the Democrat Left.

Furthermore, there is a sort of persuasion that America is somehow the “world’s sheriff,” an idea that clashes with the legitimate sovereignty of other nations. The present economic and political crisis provoked by the coup of the deep state could help Americans become aware of the need for profound internal reform. This reform will certainly be possible if President Donald Trump is re-elected and is able to liberate this great nation by bringing it into the multipolar alliance of peoples. Once again, it is authority that must go back to being in service to the community for the sake of the common good, not a tool for centralizing a subversive power that no one has elected and no one wants.

12. What is the main ethical principle of the United States?

Archbishop Viganò: This is a question that is both simple and complex at the same time. I would say that the main ethical principle of the United States is strongly affected by the Protestant mentality, which established itself in America from her very founding, thanks, as I was saying, to the excessive power of Freemasonry. American Catholics – and I imagine also the Eastern Orthodox – have become accustomed to living with this idea, which translates into a primacy of action and entrepreneurial success with respect to philosophical thought and culture that is “non-monetizable.”

In the Protestant mentality, economic success is a sign of predestination, and as such ends up legitimizing – as has effectively happened – even the oppression of the weak, who are considered “losers,” and thus not predestined by God for salvation. It is not an accident that wealth is concentrated in the hands of “WASPs” – White Anglo-Saxon Protestants – and that many immigrants, for example the Irish or the Italians, have historically always had a marginal role. This trend experienced a turnaround in the 1950s, when under the glorious Pontificate of Pius XII American Catholicism underwent a significant revival and conversions to the Church of Rome markedly increased.

Unfortunately, this parenthesis ended with the Second Vatican Council, which in a certain way represented at least a partial Protestantization of Catholics and gave rise to that nefarious alliance between the American deep state and the deep church, among whose exponents we can count political personalities like Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi and John Kerry as well as ecclesiastical personalities like the former cardinal Theodore McCarrick, whose heirs are still deeply entrenched in the in ecclesiastical institutions.

It must be recognized that the apostasy of the Bergoglian church has opened the eyes of many of the faithful: we are witnessing the reawakening of many American Catholics who recognize themselves in the traditional Faith, significantly just at the moment when they have been made the object of a joint persecution from both the deep churchand the deep state, to the point that the FBI is keeping them under surveillance as “domestic terrorists.” The situation of the Russian Church in Ukraine is in some ways – but much more serious – the mirror image of what I have just described.

13. And what drives the American politicians who unleash wars around the world – Syria, Libya, Iraq, Yugoslavia, the Ukraine...?

Archbishop Viganò: As I have said, these are political personalities who belong to the deep state, who have infiltrated into all the State institutions and the media. They hold enormous power and also enormous wealth, because they are financed by very powerful investment groups like BlackRock and Vanguard, which are in the hands of a very small number of Ashkenazi families – just a Zelensky is also an Ashkenazi. Their goal is power, since they already create and possess money. It is a power that must become global, and which in order to establish the New World Order necessarily requires the destruction of Christianity, including Protestant Christianity, as we see happening today.

There is also an alliance between ideological and economic power, that is, between those who want to dominate the world in order to establish synarchic tyranny and those whose only goal is to make a profit. For this reason, the wars promoted by the United States and NATO during the 20th and 21st centuries have been planned in view of the one world government and the cancellation of national sovereignty, but supported by those who have seen and still see these conflicts as huge opportunities to enrich themselves and weaken other nations. Complaints by Ukrainian lawmakers about the corruption of the Kiev government and the personal enrichment of its members – who continue to receive exorbitant sums from arms trafficking and other illicit activities – demonstrate that those who hold positions of power in Western nations are not protecting their citizens but instead have grave conflicts of interest.

14. Is the United States an Empire of Good?

Archbishop Viganò: I do not think there are any nations that can claim this title today, and certainly not the United States as long as it remains hostage to the subversive elements of the deep state, woke ideology, LGBTQ theory, and all the aberrations we are aware of. Of course, every nation can be used by the Providence of God for His plans, since every nation is composed of individual people who have the potential to be good and to orient their lives toward the good. Even the Roman Empire, which also persecuted Christians, created by its conquests the pre-conditions for the spread of the Gospel in the world. But this task is not the exclusive prerogative of a single nation. The Russian Federation, for example, is presently positioning itself as a barrier against the Great Reset, at least in opposing the perversion of customs and the corruption of peoples that is being carried forward by globalist ideology.

In my opinion it would be desirable that this common opposition to the New World Order be undertaken not by centralizing power and reducing one’s allies to vassals or colonies, as NATO does, but rather by rediscovering the importance of the sovereignty of individual nations, of our common Christian inheritance, of our common patrimony of culture and civilization that for two thousand years has been promoted and made fruitful by Faith in Jesus Christ.

If the peoples recognize Jesus Christ as their King; if the laws of Nations are conformed to the Commandments of God and the natural law inscribed in the heart of every man, they do not need to overwhelm themselves, nor to assert their power over others. The Christian order, regardless of the system of government that citizens choose, is the only order that protects the common good of all peoples, bringing them the light of the true God. On the other hand, the supposedly “secular state” has been demonstrated to be a fraud with which Christianity is marginalized from society in order to replace it with the globalist religion of ecologism, cancel culture, ethnic substitution, and the health dictatorship.

I believe this is the “multipolar” approach to which President Putin often refers: respecting the identity and freedom of the peoples, united by their common Christian heritage.

15. It seems that no one tries to avoid sin anymore. Is sin becoming a part of the norm in the world today? Can you give any examples?

Archbishop Viganò: Avoiding sin implies recognizing a transcendent moral norm and thus a Divine Lawgiver. In essence, it means conducting one’s private and public life within the supernatural order that God has established. For two centuries now nations have refused to publicly recognize the Lordship of Jesus Christ over societies.

The Christian West has had to deal with a process of secularization that has involved and indeed been instigated by the deep church which has infiltrated up to the highest levels of the Catholic Church, and which with Vatican II has substantially cancelled the doctrine of the Social Kingship of Our Lord, reducing the practice of the Faith to a private question, as already happened four centuries earlier with the Protestant heresy. This secularization had as its purpose the loss of the social order that had assisted individual faithful and citizens to live according to the Commandments, thereby favoring the spread of immorality, sin, and corruption.

Because where the State does not protect public Morals, and indeed promotes everything that is contrary to the Law of God as well as natural law, it is extremely difficult to remain faithful to religious practice. And this is a further demonstration that the secularization of society did not have a purpose of guaranteeing liberty to non-Christian religions but rather of undermining the social order and cancelling every aspect of Christian heritage, not only in laws but also in daily life.

16. Any split in the church leads to people turning away from God. The LGBT agenda and the legitimization of everything that was previously considered a sin has a harmful effect.

Archbishop Viganò: There is no doubt that divisions are the work of the devil, who is the prince of the revolution and of chaos. The Holy Church, as we know and believe, is one – that is, she is the only Church – just as there was only one Ark that Christ placed on earth for the salvation of men. If the ecclesial body suffers the wounds of division and schism, this happens because the Enemy of the human race – Satan – wants to drag as many souls as possible to eternal damnation.

Separating oneself from the Holy Church means abandoning the supernatural family in which we were conceived to Grace, believing that we can defend ourselves with human means against the furious assault of the Enemy. It means believing that we can renounce the truth of the Eternal Father incarnate in the Divine Son and enlivened by the Holy Spirit. But this is a grave sin of pride that makes us even weaker in resisting evil.

17. In Germany there was a slogan – Germany above all. In Ukraine – Ukraine is above everything. Don’t you think there are a lot of similarities? Why does the West support Ukrainian nationalists?

Archbishop Viganò: “Deutschland über alles” was a patriotic phrase from the hymn of the Habsburg Empire, which the Nazi party then made its own in an ultra-nationalist key, in accordance with the Protestant inheritance I mentioned earlier which places the State above everything. But while the Austro-Hungarian Empire, despite being Catholic, recognized freedom to the peoples and cultures that composed it – according to the Christian principles of good government – Nazi totalitarianism aimed at creating the ideological bases that would legitimize an ethnic supremacy – the supremacy of the Arian race – over all other people.

This vision, after decades of deploring the excesses of Nationalism, has today made a comeback in an even more destructive key, because it attributes a moral superiority to the “globalist religion,” to woke ideology, to cancel culture, ensuring that everything that is not conformed to the precepts of this totalitarian thought is considered heretical, and that those who do not conform to it are judged unworthy of being part of the civil consortium. It should come as no surprise that the principal theorizers of this ideology are culturally connected and in certain cases are even tied by kinship with the ideologues of Nazism.

By way of example, Adolf Heusinger, the head of the 1940 Operationsabteilungthat helped Hitler plan the invasions of Poland, Norway, Denmark, and France, was the chairman of the NATO Committee in Washington from 1961 to 1964. And what is even more disconcerting is that this revival of neo-Nazi principles is supported and financed by the Ashkenazi world, which includes many of the political leaders and prominent proponents of globalism, with the contribution of pro-Zionist neo-con movements that are present above all in the United States and tied to the American deep state.

18. What should politicians take into consideration when they are making decisions in our time? What should they base their decisions on?

Archbishop Viganò: The role of politicians, yesterday as today, is to commit themselves to good governance and to the defense of their fellow citizens from the globalist coup. All politicians of all nations are called to this without distinction, but in particular those who find themselves hostage to the subversive elite of the New World Order. They ought to ask themselves: What will I say to Christ when I find myself standing before Him to be judged?

It is necessary – I have been repeating this for some time – that an Anti-globalist Alliance be formed that unites all peoples with their leaders in an action of opposition and resistance against the establishment of the New World Order, the Great Reset, the Agenda 2030, and its programmatic points. This Alliance ought to have as its purpose the denunciation of the global coup and its architects, the reappropriation of national sovereignties (including monetary sovereignty) and the systematic boycott of everything that erodes individual freedoms by imposing destructive models and lifestyles.

It is indispensable to put an end to the folly of gender theory, the corruption of children, the dissolution of the family, the cancellation of Christian civilization, and the enslavement of individuals. It is also necessary that whoever governs the State is not blackmailed by financial lobbies or more or less hidden power groups, punishing conflicts of interest that make the betrayal of peoples possible with severe laws.

It seems to me that this Alliance would be an excellent premise for the re-establishment of peace between Nations, which today have been torn apart by conflicts caused by the globalist elite, and that in this battle for truth and freedom it could unite even political leaders from nations whose governments are declaring themselves to be enemies of the Russian Federation and its allies.

19. Why has the human race, throughout thousands year of history, not learned to live without wars?

Archbishop Viganò: Humanity could and would like to live without wars: the collapse of popular support for NATO’s warmongering leaders and the hundreds of demonstrations against the war in Ukraine (among others) that are being held in many European nations are the proof of this. But as long as war is considered not as a tool to re-establish justice or to defend oneself from attack (which in this case it would be legitimate), but rather to impose a dystopian model of tyrannical society in view of the New World Order to the detriment of citizens, none of us will be able to escape from it and we will all be victims.

I repeat: the elimination of the globalist subversive elite is essential if there is to be a peaceful coexistence between peoples. President Donald Trump also said this recently, and it seems to be that such a declaration makes him a privileged interlocutor of President Putin in order to open up peace talks that would have as their purpose the ouster of the emissaries of the deep state and the World Economic Forum from national governments and supranational organizations, which are dangerous emanation of the deep state.

20. Our program will be seen both in Russia and Ukraine, so what would you like to say in conclusion?

Archbishop Viganò: As a Bishop and Successor of the Apostles, I address the Russian and Ukrainian peoples in the name of Jesus Christ the King and the All Holy Mother of God, Help of Christians. Pray with faith in this blessed tine in which we celebrate the Holy Mysteries of the Passion, Death, and Resurrection of the Savior, to implore peace; a peace that can only come from Christ, the Prince of Peace. Be aware that the threat hanging over the world comes from the abandonment of the Commandments of God, from rebellion against the eternal law willed by the Lord for our good and for our eternal salvation.

The Lord has said: Without me you can do nothing (Jn 15:5). Pray with faith, dear brothers in Christ: pray to the Queen of Peace, that she may intercede before the throne of God and implore for all of us true peace, pax Christi in regno Christi, the peace of Christ in the kingdom of Christ. Pray that the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, may stir up sentiments of truth and justice in the rulers of all nations, leading them to make a leap of dignity and loyalty towards their fellow citizens, inducing them to free themselves from subjection to powers that no one wants, powers whom no one has elected, and whose sole purpose is to cancel Christ from the world and damn the souls He has redeemed with his own Blood.

Pray that the Lord may raise up among you honest and courageous leaders who have the common good at heart, not the interest of conspirators. But above all, dear Friends, start with yourselves: let the Lord reign above all in your hearts, your families, and your communities. Remain in the Grace of God, because no one can ever take friendship with the Lord away from you. He is the only Supreme Good, and in all adversities He will never let you lacking in his holy assistance. Jesus Christ has said: You are my friends, if you do what I command you (Jn 15:14). Behold: the secret to having peace reign in your hearts and in society is found in obedience to the Gospel. And may the Lord bless you all.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

Electronic Telepathy: The Brain Is the Battlefield of the Future

Directed Energy is being weaponized. Individuals’ brains can be targeted by microwaves

By Peter Koenig

https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content...00x266.jpg

DARPA Neurologist and Chief of the Neuroethics Studies Program at Georgetown University, Washington DC, Dr. James Giordano, who is also a weapons expert, started his presentation at West Point NY Military Academy by saying, “The brain is and will be the 21st Century battlefield. End of story.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N02SK9yd60s

DARPA stands for Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, a Pentagon thinktank.

https://rielpolitik.files.wordpress.com/...age-15.png

Dr. Giordano talks about how Directed Energy can be and is being weaponized. Individuals’ brains can be targeted by microwaves, the type of 5G and soon to come 6G, of which you see antennas growing like mushrooms all over the word.

They tell you, it is to make your internet, and ever more sophisticated computers and smart phones faster, with more outreach capacity – and to help advance digitization.

This may all be true to some extent, but the real reason behind these microwave towers is to target YOU, the individual.

Why? From other sources we know that the Fourth Industrial Revolution is in full implementation.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content...schwab.png

Klaus Schwab, eternal CEO of the World Economic Forum (WEF), published his book, “Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution”, already in 2018.

In it he writes about such significant topics as Embedding Values in Technologies; The Internet of Things; Data Ethics; Artificial Intelligence and Robotics; and a special chapter on “Altering the Human Being”.

In this chapter, Schwab addresses biotechnologies, and neurotechnologies, transhumanism – precisely the science that Dr. Giordano was talking about in 2018 at the West Point Military Academy, and which is in full implementation.

If we connect the dots, we realize that the “Brain as the Battlefield of the Future” is NOW and that we were warned way ahead. According to Dr. Giordano, the science of neurotechnologies has started some 40 years ago and he, Giordano, has been part of it for at least 35 years. Therefore, warnings have been all over the place, at the latest by Klaus Schwab’s “Fourth Industrial Revolution” (available from Amazon).

The Death Cult has again given people warnings, according to its “rules” – way ahead of time, so, They may be successful.

Why is it, that we never take note of such warnings?

Because we do not believe in so much built-in evil in humanity? Or, because we do not want to leave our “comfort zone”, our dystopian view of a “safe world”? They know it. And we MUST break that boundary between comfort and reality. If not, we are doomed.

“If you are targeted there is virtually nothing you can do,” says William Binney, ex-NSA Technical Director and whistleblower. The NSA is the US National Security Agency, one of 15 US Intelligence Agencies.

https://rumble.com/v2dnsdk-march-18-2023.html

If you want a lead-demonstrator to stop demonstrating, you target his brain with ultra-shortwaves.

We by now know them as 5G. You make them depressed, so they do not want to demonstrate anymore; you make them suicidal and the problem is resolved. You do this as many times as you want and create an ambiance of depression. These are paraphrased words of Barry Trower, ex-MI5 Microwave scientist and whistleblower.

Mr. Trower adds, that low-level micro-waves can cause all sorts of cancers and leukemias and further elaborates that for the past 40 years or so the UK Government, plus basically all the Anglosaxon governments, have been lying to their people, to protect not only the high-flying profits of these “industries of death”, but perhaps more importantly for not divulging the evil objective of total surveillance and enslavement that they have planned.

Today, we gradually see what this “plan” entails.

Through “Electronic Telepathy”, Trower adds, we are able to monitor the brain. If at one point, technology foresaw that tiny, hardly visible chip-implants were necessary in the brain to be able to electronically access individuals’ thinking – hence the highly magnetic graphene oxide in many of the covid vaxx-injections – this may no longer be necessary.

In other words, we are all vulnerable – vaxxed or unvaxxed – to mind interference through the worldwide coverage of 5G shortwaves. And the worst is, we may not even notice when it “hits” us.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content...-Brain.png

https://www.globalresearch.ca/global-dep...ed/5745289

Quote:All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).

Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.

***

The masters behind covid-19 have designed the perfect WWIII scenario. No need for a war that destroys the infrastructure. The fear-mongering and coerced vaxxing apparatus is and will be massively sterilizing as well as resulting in mortality:

“More people, according to VAERS, have died after getting the shot in four months during a single vaccination campaign than from all other vaccines combined over more than a decade and a half.”

“The U.K.’s government vaccine adverse event system has collected more 2,200 reports of reproductive disorders after coronavirus injections, including excessive or absent menstrual bleeding, delayed menstruation, vaginal hemorrhaging, miscarriages, and stillbirths.” (Quoted in Koenig on Depopulation)

The article below is a followup on a previous article by Peter Koenig entitled:

The Corona Crisis: Has “Depopulation” Already Begun?

*

We are at the cross-roads of falling into the fangs of a diabolical super-capitalist “cult” that wants to decimate massively our world population. In fact, it has already started.

And what these “diabolical elites” usually do, is to announce their “horror plans” in advance in the form of  “scenario planning” and “simulations”.  And they did. We cannot say we were not told.

Let me just list a few instances where and when we were told that a “depopulation cum genocide” is part of a planned agenda.

1. The 2o10 Rockefeller Report entitled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development– pointed already more than 10 years ago to the “Lockstep Scenario” – which we are in right now, plus three more sinister scenarios. Preparation for this report – and the well-laid out plan started decades before. In its introduction, the report says,

“We believe that scenario planning has great potential for use in philanthropy to identify unique interventions, simulate and rehearse important decisions that could have profound implications, and highlight previously undiscovered areas of connection and intersection” …..

“The results of our first scenario planning exercise demonstrate a provocative and engaging exploration of the role of technology and the future of globalization….”

I believe it is not a coincidence that 9 years later, the so-called Event 201, sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation – BMGF (a close associate of the Rockefellers), the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine – JHSM (created and funded by The Rockefellers) and the World Economic Forum – WEF (a consortium of neoliberal capitalist entrepreneurs and thinkers), computer-simulated the first scenario outlines by the Rockefeller Report, the “Lockstep Scenario”, a corona virus outbreak creating worldwide havoc, killing 65 million people in 18 months, and destroying / destabilizing a large part of the world economy, creating misery, famine and death.

Although there is no direct reference to the clear eugenics agenda of the R-Report, its focus is on how philanthropy may help shape the future of the poor, of developing countries. There is enough insinuation to conclude that one of the tools to help is population reduction. See the following in the Introduction section:

“The results of our first scenario planning exercise demonstrate a provocative and engaging exploration of the role of technology and the future of globalization ….”

And

“…. how can we best position ourselves not just to identify technologies that improve the lives of poor communities but also to help scale (emphasis by author) and spread those that emerge? And how will the social, technological, economic, environmental, and political conditions of the future enable or inhibit our ability to do so?”

2. Event 201, organized by JHSM, simulated the coming Corona Crisis on 18 October 2019 in New York City.

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/...ideos.html

The main purpose of Event 201 was computer-simulating precisely what began a few months later in Wuhan, China, and is happening today.

It is what the R-Report referred to as scaling the population? And that in the presence of the famous and powerful, representatives of the highest levels of the UN, WHO, IMF, World Bank UNICEF, CDC, FDA, EU / EC, and many more.

For those who don’t know, the JHSM was created and is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation – a key propagator of eugenics. The Rockefellers already supported Hitler and his eugenics agenda, by supplying the Third Reich with petroleum to sustain its economy and, especially, to invade the Soviet Union, to destroy the capitalist threat of communism. Alas, they failed. (See analysis of historian Dr. Jacques Pauwels, The Myth of a Good War)

3. Henry Kissinger’s 1974  National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM200)– stating population growth as a national security threat. The report is still valid, more than ever – and its implementation in full swing.

While the report does not contain a direct quote of population reduction or otherwise a direct reference to a eugenics agenda, it is multiple times insinuated by referring to population growth being a “National Security Threat”, a State Department lingo for “controlling overpopulation”, i.e., reducing population.

Kissinger’s himself often infamously said:

“Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money, controls the world.”

Well, Bill Gates and many of his billionaire cronies are working on food control, world wide, but especially beginning in the US, where Gates has become the largest private landowner of the United States with at least 242,000 acres (about 980 square kilometers) of American farmland, spread over several states.

4. Klaus Schwab’s (WEF founder and CEO for life) “The Great Reset” describes in detail what is to happen to humanity in the coming ten years, also called the UN Agenda 2030, with the infamous concluding quote, by 2030 “You will own nothing, and you will be happy”.

video “You’ll own nothing, And you’ll be happy.”

Again, there is no direct reference to a coming depopulation of the world.

However, in an interesting 2016 interview with Swiss French TV, Klaus Schwab talks about implanting microchips:

“What we see is a kind of fusion of the physical, digital and biological world”.

The referenced section of the interview was summarized in a 2 minutes youtube on 16 May 2021

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dg6BlXuj8cM

These statements in 2016 clearly announce The Great Reset, with all its consequences, where Artificial Intelligence (AI) merges with humankind, whereby “human survivors” become fully controlled “transhumans”, responding to outside computer signals.

There is no limit of what such computer signals can do to humans, aka, “transhumans” – a term first invented by Klaus Schwab in his book, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution”.

Later he refers to covid-19  as “The pandemic [which] represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world”.

In other words, the world that we tirelessly built together for decades is no longer viable and satisfactory. Let’s scrap it and reconstruct it altogether as soon as possible.

What he doesn’t say, but is implicit in his Great Reset, is that his new world, a One World Order, will be reigned by a tyranny of an all-possessing few billionaire oligarchs. The infamous conclusion of the Great Reset is “You will own nothing, and you will be happy.”

5. The Georgia Guidestones, a granite monument,  “anonymously” erected in 1980 in Elbert County, Georgia, in the US of A, speaks for itself.

The monument makes ten predictions, of which the first one is “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature”.

Given today’s world population of about 7.7 billion (2019), this implies a reduction of almost 95%. We can only hope that this remains but a pipedream. For details on the Guidestones monument see here

Concluding Remarks

And there are many more signals which we may have heard of, or vaguely perceived, but soon forgotten. Some of them, like the full contents of the WEF’s Great Reset – is so horrifying that many who heard of it, or even read it, simply discard it, as unreal.

That’s a mistake. You should take note and realize this is a diabolical plan. BUT you should not be afraid – NEVER – instead bond together, with our spiritual and human positive-thinking power we can vibrate with the light – and overcome.

The crossroads dilemma is – do we accept this diabolical project, or do we choose the light?

Choosing the light, the truth – might be much more uncomfortable than “sticking with the darkness”, the lies we have been told and tolerated for so many years.

Choosing the light, the truth makes us strong, makes us swing on a high frequency.  But it requires togetherness and perseverance – the reinvention of the term “solidarity” – and spirituality. And we will.

Planned Chaos 1/3 - WWIII - The Quiet War is a Hybrid War

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e...6x1043.jpg

Prepare For Change | Gomesha

This Planned Chaos article is part 1 of a 3-part series. These articles had been completed in November of last year but were held until now. These 3 articles about WWIII, the Great Reset, and Why They Do This? form a thorough explanation of the craziness we’re seeing in the world today, who’s behind it, what they aim to achieve, and why they’re so evil. We hope that people will be receptive to this information now, and it will have a better chance to inform and wake up more people in key positions.

World War III: The Beginnings
World War III is upon us now. According to the leaked documents of the Rockefeller Plan and the Bilderberg’s playbook as appeared in William Cooper’s Behold A Pale Horse, it was ordered to begin in 1954.

The original strategy was to destroy humanity for the gain of elites, slowly over time in what they termed the “Quiet War.” Planned Chaos has focused on the tactics of the Quiet War which the plan called “Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars.” The war is hybrid, including weapons of the psychological nature, financial, chemical, AI, cultural, and kinetic.

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars An Introduction Programming Manual Operations Rese.pdf
https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e...s-Rese.pdf

Recently, the hybrid war took a turn to include divisive tactics, the recent fires, the climate “crisis”, moral values, and media manipulation all being broadly cast at overwhelmingly loud amplification. The goal has always been to seed unrest, confusion, and division among the population and its targeted at western democracies, primarily the United States. The US is the last bastion of freedom in the world and the rulers can’t have that.

The recent amplification
The amplification of the long-planned hybrid war began in late 2019 when the NIH funded, [alleged] lab-engineered coronavirus was released [fake pandemic started] from the Wuhan lab under the COVID-19 program. (Certificate of Vaccine Identification – 2019)

What the MSM eventually termed the [fake] lab leak theory had been reported by our intel sources at the time through Benjamin Fulford and based on insider intel of 17 intelligence agencies. Information about who Fauci, Gates, GAVI, and other conspirators were and how big pharma had already applied for patents on [bioweapons] vaccines were publicly available from sources at the outset, as were the long-reported plans of the New World Order in various forms.

The planned chaos that surrounded the world since 2020 at the height of the [faked] Covid outbreak really kicked into gear then, intended to fulfill UN Agenda 21. To allow for our free will clause, the perpetrators – who we’ll loosely refer to as the Cabal – need to present what they’re going to do and get some form of public buy-in. This is their form of black magic, essentially “give the people what they want.” They did this through many means, but most notably through Event 201, the London Olympics, and the Economist 2019 predictions magazine. Covid was the releasing of the bulls, but let’s examine the planned chaos that served as prelude to 2021.

Follow the Money to See How It Began
The release of the COVID [fake plandemic] virus [flu renamed] came after a series of systemic bank failures that were happening throughout the economy in the early fall of 2019. The repo markets, the over-valuation of tech markets, Quantitative Easing, corporate stock buy backs, cheap interest rates, ongoing Wall Street greed and more financial shenanigans all fueled conditions that led to inflation and a looming financial crisis that crashed the global economy we’re seeing today.

A reason the crash is not so obvious is because of all the other current distractions: ETs, UFO, Ukraine war, Biden corruption hearings, Trump indictments, fires, immigration crisis… you get the idea. But the economic completion of the financial cycle is paramount in forcing the current conclusion of this global hybrid war.

Among the recent financial factors are the mortgage crisis in China, the energy crisis in Europe, the inflation crisis in the US, the gilt crisis of the UK, the US debt ceiling, the collapse of the US dollar, the emergence of BRICS and the Global Repository, among many other imploding financial fissures often reported through Prepare for Change. These recent financial issues have been exacerbated by the Russia/Ukraine conflict, and ongoing struggles of the global Central Banks acted out by proxies Black Rock, Vanguard, and State Street. Does anyone remember that the Vatican was asking for their assets back in November 2022? Meanwhile, central banks have been hoarding gold and the US Treasury seems to think they can print money ad infinitum.

The can has been kicked down the proverbial financial road as far as it can go, and it is crucial to understand that money has a lifecycle. Every currency – especially a fiat currency backed by nothing physical – will eventually fail.

All the above stressors were designed to crash the global economy, turn the US into a 3rd world country, displace the US dollar as the Global Reserve Currency, and usher in the new financial system based on another fiat currency – the Central Banks Digital Currency (or CBDC). The Cabal has long planned to bring about the Great Reset using these strategies.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...x1024.jpeg

Time magazine cover from 2020

The Great Reset is the key objective of WWIII. But that’s only half the story. The Great Reset will primarily accomplish the goals of putting the planet on lockdown and humanity under surveillance. However, it also accomplishes something far more sinister than most can even imagine: it will finally avenge the fallen tribes of Khazaria who vowed in 720 CE to destroy their three religious enemies – Islam, Christianity, and Judaism.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...6x3471.png

It is time to put it plainly… the Planned Chaos that we’ve all been experiencing since 2020 are the tactics of the New World Order, aka, the Order of the Black Sun’s playbook to destroy the current order and take control of the planet, based on the religious worship of Satan. In doing so, the ruling class of Satan worshippers accomplishes their sacred goals:

• Control all planetary wealth and assets (humanity among them)

• Enforce a slave state

• Reduce the world’s population to under 500,000,000

• Go public with worshipping Satan

• Usher in 10,000 years of “peace”

Because the goals – that they publicly state – are so astonishing, most of us simply can’t believe them. That is our weakness that they exploit.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...6x494.jpeg

A necessary but bittersweet pill to swallow
The Satanic goals stated above could terrify you. But deep down, you already know it is the bitter truth. Few others can tell you about it.  And others will suggest it attached to the notion of hellfire and brimstone.

What we do at Prepare for Change, and have done since 2014, is present this information with the historical context and unabashed truth. It scares us too. It enrages us. It motivates us. In turn, we work tirelessly to prepare people for this moment and offer them this promise: victory of the light.

We will get through this. To do so, we must identify the problem, acknowledge truth as horrible as it may be, deal with it, and heal. Finally, we must pass the information on to others. We then help them heal. We continue to present Planned Chaos articles, videos and virtual discussions as your shortcut to understanding the reality around us. What others can’t face, we have. With this in mind, we continue our series begun in 2020. When we’re through, we want you to take action.

This series of articles on WWIII was so scary when we completed it in November last year, that I decided to sit on it. At the time, I didn’t want to add more fear to the collective consciousness. I feel that we have been given tools now that can help more of us see this war for what it is.

We report that the dark leadership level of the hidden societies are gone by and large. We are informed about planetary clean-up operations and the truth is coming fast and strong. The information in this release can help some generals and high-ranking military men understand the big picture: the US cannot fall. You will NOT be rewarded for taking part in its failure. You have a chance to leave your past behind and do good for our future starting today.

WWIII was planned to be a means to an end
In this presentation, we will discuss how we got to this point in history through the infiltration strategy of the perpetrators. We’ll also summarize the tactics from their playbooks that describe in detail what the long-term plan was. We will detail each plan which affects a sector of society with the prime examples summarized. There are many sectors so think of this as a blitzkrieg.

Because order is to be achieved out of chaos, few can connect all the aspects so well unless you’re spending a lot of time doing so and know history. So, this will be something of a history lesson.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...22x746.png

Let’s begin by establishing the concept: the ends justify the means. The end is the Great Reset wherein a whole new society is planned. The means are the battles of the hybrid WWIII.

The timing of the war is pegged to the economic cycle or the global reserve currency lifespan

The fiat currency of the global hegemon – the United States – was designed to fail ever since becoming a debt-based society by going off of the Bretton Woods “gold standard” agreement and onto the petrodollar in 1973. Well aware of this since its inception, the masterminds of the US Fed – primarily Rockefellers and Rothschilds – have long understood that the pyramid of money scheme or ponzi scheme would crash. Few people know that the Fed is privately owned by Cabal families that are behind the publicly known banks that comprise the Fed. The book, The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin and other scholars work explore this truth.

Through years of recklessly printing money and creating untenable inflation, governments, businesses, and the populations of country’s can no longer pay their debts. This kicking the can down the road has run out of road. This created the perfect storm that the United States is in right now and went into overdrive with Biden administration policies. The long-standing plan of the Bush/Clinton/Obama cartel are the ones behind the systemic failure and hold allegiance to the Rockefeller bloodline families – in most cases being their heirs. These zealots are by and large, the foot soldiers of the Biden administration and deep state who appeared to be opposing Trump.

In reality, all administrations are beholden to their families and the Order of the Black Sun or relative Masonic tribe as Rabbi Trump holds allegiance with the Rothschilds family and Scottish Rite Masonic Lodge. So, in the US case, the prevailing political party’s heads are either playing out the best-case scenario for themselves, their family, or order. Important to note is that you’re not represented here and thus become part of the number of the herd that needs to be culled. But more on this later.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...x1753.jpeg

Note that these politicians, world leaders, generals, and top bankers are very successful in their jobs. They’re just not working for you.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...0x950.jpeg

Countries and indeed the world go to war when the financial system fails. Money needs to be regenerated through the war machine itself and the subsequent rebuilding of society. Given the untenable amount of debt, this is how government, business, and the public play their part in the crash:

Government cannot pay their debts especially since the unhinged money creation of the past two years. Proposing to pay off student loan debt, paying for the war in Ukraine, paying for all the artillery to fight the pandemic (vaxes, test kits, make-shift hospitals, PPP loans), bailing out the airlines, giveaways to the wealthy, et al, are all costs being passed on to the public. The current debt per citizen in the United States is over $93,000 each. For unsecured dept it is over $200,000 per person. https://www.usdebtclock.org/

Businesses are poised to fail. Those that managed to survive the pandemic did so by taking on loads of debt. Let’s summarize the end goal of the pandemic in relation to the economy… it largely closed for 2 plus years. Can businesses survive like this? Not many small and midsized businesses. Thus, the pandemic was intended to choose winners while creating contraction among small and midsized businesses. It’s said that 20% of businesses will fail and that 80% of the population of the US will be hit by the crash – and this is already after the reopening of the economy where many businesses closed. All the while, retail giants were chosen early in the pandemic to stay open. The large box retailers and Amazon are the new version of the state who will be the first to adopt Great Reset policies. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/14/trump-as...risis.html

The public are in large numbers weeks away from poverty. Many are backing off from buying homes or vehicles right now. Hybrid workers of the pandemic left jobs in cities to move to more affordable smaller towns. Now that employers want their work force back in offices in some industries, people are quitting to go try their hand at less stressful jobs rather than return. Recent reports show that 60% of US population can’t afford their utility bills. If energy isn’t solved, as is the case in Germany and Switzerland right now, (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...n-gas.html ) energy costs for consumers have doubled because of policy of sanctions against Russia. The absurdity is that China is buying Russian natural gas AND SELLING IT BACK TO THE EU. India is also now buying oil from Saudi Arabia and marking it up to sell to Europe. https://www.eutimes.net/2022/08/china-ca...to-europe/

The point here is that economic failure always leads to societal change: see Germany 1920’s, Russia 1910’s, Latin America throughout the latter half of the 20th century, and in any totalitarian dictatorship authoritarian run country near you. This is the central bank and Cabal playbook – crash the economy and install the desired regime. The agents are called Economic Hitmen

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...8x500.jpeg

Odd how the central bank has always survived these turmoil’s while everything else fails.

Other means to the ends – Order Out of Chaos
The measures that took place during the pandemic resulted in the clear crushing of the economy, but this is only one of the means to the ends of total societal control by the Cabal or the Great Reset. The economic part of the plan is intended to eliminate the middle-class and put the US into third-world status – all by design. It’s clear to many that a global consortium publicly headed by Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum in collaboration with other world-level banks and financial institutions: the BIS (Bank of International Settlements), WMF (World Monetary Fund), and the Central Banks control the levers of global wealth.

As laid out in Planned Chaos 2020, the bankers of the world’s elites are well coordinated and use their positions to orchestrate the global economy. Prepare for Change has unique access to global intel, royal families, secret societies, and Alliance personnel that all agree that the current global financial situation is a means to control planetary assets.

In short, the Planned Chaos, or what the Masonic order calls Ordo ab Chao or Order Out of Chaos is central to what’s been going on in the world during these predetermined “End Times.” The chaos – not only the financial, but the pandemic, the social unrest, the climate crisis, the Ukraine War, the bulk of the mass shootings, and the coming food, water, and energy shortages – are all brought to you by willing politicians, blackmailed leaders, bribed newscasters, controlled health service officials, et al, who serve the New World Order.

They have agreed to sacrifice their souls as low-ranking members of the Order before they really understand what their self-sacrifice means. Known as the “hidden hand,” the international Cabal is masterminded by dwindling members of the Order of the Black Sun. Black Sun in German, is translated as Schwarz Sonne, or the SS. This is not a coincidence.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...3x525.jpeg

Access comes with a high price
Thus, the elite financial interests, the World Economic Forum, Bill Gates, and secret societies are at work behind the scenes tirelessly trying to control the population, control resources, and actively hiding the reality of the financial system. The financial system born out of Babylonian black magick carries powerful occult energy that dooms mere mortals. As controllers, they are a very small number of wealthy elite families. These wealthy elite families not only have a financial stake, but they also have a controlling stake in the planet and the planet’s population which they claim by divine right through Satan. They want to control the planet’s population to their ends. They are ultimately a small group – less than 1% of the 1% of the world’s population are fighting to stay in power and fear being overrun by the mass awakening and rightful anger of the people.

To put it most simply; they fear for their lives. Yet, they believe that they have the power to reset the game. In the past, they did. However, situations are critically different this time. Thus, the Great Reset is a high stakes game of life and death, which helps explain their being “all in” on the hand they’ve dealt themselves.

In their version of the game, they win and all their blackmailed or brainwashed followers – political and military leaders, celebrities, bankers, – you know, “important people” – are told that they are “special” and that they will be among the winners when the reset happens. Military leaders need to heed this message: this is a deceptive con job – it ain’t gonna happen.

Among our groups, they understand the con, when hearing that NESARA/GESARA takes place, they will be paid out their proverbial loot on Tuesday. Then, when all hell breaks out, they’ll be able to go to Mars or their beloved DUMBS or deep underground military bunkers to eventually repopulate the planet with their unique “specialness” after the surface chaos subsides.

In today’s terms, the special ones have been promised Trump Bucks based on the presumed actual ledger of the Global Repository that was shown to Trump early in his term according to Ground Command, Kim Goguen. Even without Goguen’s claims, it’s supported by other sources that Trump has promised his patriot allies payouts when “the Plan” goes into effect any day now.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...1x960.jpeg

We’ve seen those ledgers of quadrillions of dollars too and have Super Petchili, Dinar, Dong, Zimbabwe notes, et al. Those monies and revaluations have a slim chance to be of value, but anything is possible. Just not really probable at this point.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...1x904.jpeg

Expand your horizons
With this perspective, it’s a lot easier to understand that these evil doers have cast their lot with the former prevailing side of Lucifer. With the huge secret that they hold, blackmail, bribery, and worse are the price to pay. This largely explains the inexplicable actions of our world leaders and celebrities over the past few years. By ascribing to the Order of the Black Sun, a high level of power players control the public figures we see with offers they cannot refuse.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...0x1086.png

These powerful leaders, politicians, military generals, celebrities, scientists, academics, tech prophets and more are in the small club. What’s important to note about the elites is that they have gathered up just about every asset that they can get their hands on. Even at the time of this writing, the Vatican (which we referred to as the wealthiest institution on the planet due to their claim of owning people’s souls among years of asset accumulation) has called for their assets to be returned to their coffers.

What the global elites are trying to accomplish right now continuing up to the year 2025, for several very significant reasons, is to control the narrative. Because of this, we hear the Biden administration saying things are going great. Fed Chair Powell keeps printing money and toying with interest rates. Janet Yellen was denying that the US is in a recession. And White House officials like Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre change the debate, obstruct, avoid, or lie about the state of the economy when asked to comment.

The puppet master’s control what you think, and their minions are trained to deny, deny, deny the truth until the moment of fait accompli – when it all goes down. They think that you won’t remember 2008. If they keep telling a lie, eventually people will believe it. You can check Nazi Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels on that one.

Back to the banks
The central bankers are executing a push to destabilize the dollar to force its eminent collapse. It stands to reason that many countries are aligned against the US dollar as the global hegemon. Those are the BRICS Alliance which is composed of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Other countries are joining the BRICS Alliance as they see the writing on the wall. The fact that at this writing the dollar is considered strong is a misnomer because all other currencies are experiencing deflation of value due to the inflation of the money supply – or said another way, the overall value of global currencies is falling so the dollar appears desired. This is the benefit of having been the global reserve currency for the past financial cycle. The stark reality is that the dollar only holds 3 cents value from its original introduction when it was pegged to an ounce of gold, then valued at $35/oz. back in 1933.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...24x576.png

The US media can try to change the definition of recession and tell you that the country is experiencing inflation because of Russia making prices go up, but real observers know that inflation comes when you inflate the pool of money by printing more, in turn reducing the value of the money you once had under control.

What we’re observing in the West are steps in the financial world to establish the change to Central Bank Digital Currency, which would work well with one centralized world government surveillance state. A one-world religion under Lucifer. And a New World Order or Great Reset.

Create scarcity and pocket the profits
The global elite maintains power through scarcity, by controlling supply and demand. With the pending US dollar crash, they will hold all the assets and real money will be scarce. This is why scarcity is an issue with all assets. This can be seen with energy for example. This can be seen with the New Green Deal that they tried to push. This can be seen with the climate change narrative which they try to push. This can be seen through the shortage of oil and energy you see. Though there are many solutions, if the Cabal stays in power, the great breakthroughs like free energy cannot be commoditized. Additionally, they don’t want positive solutions as they need to feed off of suffering and want less pesky humans about.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...0x400.jpeg

Problem. Reaction. Solution. – The playbook(s)
We’ve come to the playbook part of our discussion. The books are many from the Russian Rules for Revolution, to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, to Morals and Dogmas by Albert Pike, to Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, the Rockefeller Lockstep Scenario, Behold a Pale Horse and others. The playbooks all have order out of chaos in common. Each go into particulars of how to accomplish chaos and what the tactics should be as well as providing vindication through their god as to why they have been the chosen one.

What we call Planned Chaos is otherwise known as the Hegelian Dialectic. The Cabal uses this black magick technique to confuse the population and incite fear to create order.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...0x400.jpeg

We’ve seen the Hegelian Dialectic working in real-time over the past pandemic and societal unrest of the past couple of years by creating a problem, eliciting a response – often an expected reaction so that a predetermined solution can be activated and put into place. This psychological paradigm is called – problem: reaction: solution.

When used effectively for political purposes, for maintaining power or control, or in controlling a narrative, the world’s elite creates and has been creating a new form of psychological warfare. This psychological tactic has been the hybrid weapon of World War III. Currently, social media is the battlefield for the “quiet weapon” of propaganda. Using AI for social control through message control and censorship is their primary warrior there.

Scare people into forfeiting their rights
A person in fear will give up their rights quickly. The prime example of the dialectic is clearly the results of the [fake] pandemic. In this pandemic example, the [alleged] problem was to create a virus [rename the flu]  at the Wuhan laboratory and release it  [pretend to release a virus] during the World Military Games to travel home with international military athletes from around the world towards the end of 2019 as was reported then by Prepare for Change in our interviews with Benjamin Fulford.

The reaction would be to create the global virus defense strategy as centralized by willing useful idiots of the WHO and the population reducing criminals of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This was laid out at their Event 201. It would also create the reaction of fighting a global war against an invisible enemy using Personal Protection Equipment controlled by Cabal providers and distributed through chosen retailers with the coup de grace being President Trump rushing in Project Warp Speed to create a solution in the vaccines themselves.

In retrospect – or as we painstakingly detailed at the time – it should be obvious to anyone paying the slightest bit of attention, that the result of the pandemic – a PLANdemic – was another part of the hybrid war. It along with the economic situation that it accompanied were intended to centralize power and authoritarian rule, to consolidate assets, to put in surveillance measures, to subjugate individual rights, as well as attempt to dismantle the US Constitution. The state of fear allowed the fascists to exploit weary people who would turn on each other without the military firing a shot. Brilliant military strategy by any measure.

Anyone who opposed the authoritarian measures would suffer swift judgment and loss of individual rights, loss of access to social media platforms, loss of one’s voice via censorship, and outright attack by social justice warriors, loss of a job, loss of access to education, loss of access to food or groceries, loss of access to health services, and in some extreme cases physical internment. Many saw police forces receiving windfall amounts to militarize themselves while calls to defund the police made mainstream news narratives. In reality, billions of dollars flowed into the fraternities of police through Cares Act funds intended to be used for Covid-19 community recovery.

What many people didn’t see at the time was also how relief funds flowed into billionaires’ coffers and how the Fed printed 80% of the physical US dollars in all circulation during the years of 2020-2022 – the real cause of inflation. This was done during the fog of war but planned well in advance.

Sound familiar? Altogether, the hybrid warfare has had a devastating effect on people’s psyche, pocketbooks, investments, supply chains and result in fear, hopelessness, shortages of necessities (food, water, energy). The war ultimately leads to the panicked public running to government and begging for help. Of course, that help comes with loss of your freedoms, assets, and a slew of new mandates. The puppet masters understand this well and this is all why they create planned chaos in the first place. But why go so big all at once? And, why at all?

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...4x2350.png

War As Prophecy
To understand the beginning of this whole mess we have to go back to a region around present-day Ukraine in Eastern Europe. This all began where they intend to end this. This is the history part of our series. It began in Khazaria around 530 CE.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...x1008.jpeg

According to varying accounts, the Khazar or Khazarian people were such fervent Molech or “secret” Satan worshipers around their region near Turkey, Mongolia and Eastern Europe – presently Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Poland, etc. – that around 500 C.E. to 700 C.E. they were forced to convert or choose either Judaism, Christianity, or Islam as a religion in an effort to “civilize” them. Tennent’s of their Molech worship included blood sacrifice, child sacrifice, child torture, bleeding out and drinking their blood and eating their hearts (similar to Aztecs sacrifice). What has become known as adrenochrome ingesting.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...5x593.jpeg

Forced to convert to a more positive religion by their nearby neighbors Persia (now Iran), greater Turkey, and Russia, the elite-class Khazars choose Rabbinic Talmudism – a form of Judaism. This religion came to be in the Second Temple period in Jerusalem through descendants of Esau and the Edomites who took over Orthodox Judaism at that time. These Khazars brought in Talmudic Rabbis to teach them their new religion. Thus, these Eastern European converted “Jews,” today known as Zionists, began their holy war in the name of Satan to corrupt and destroy all three religions that they were given the choice of. It is because of this that they vowed to use all means necessary which are described in the previously mentioned material to achieve their goals and eventually prepare the way for Satan to return and assume his throne over the planet. Therefore, the planned chaos in the world today.

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e...wP869v.mp4

Who are the Khazars?
They were, for the most part, descendants of Noah’s son Japhet and his descendant Ashkenaz. They became known as the Ashkenazi Jews. They corrupted Christianity through Catholicism, Judaism through the Talmudic/Zionism and Islam through Wahabbism, the strict religion of Saudi Arabia. They are imposter Jews and are one and the same with the Nazi’s.

Much of their tribe or populous/followers have been “exiled” throughout Europe and into America. People such as Jeffrey Epstein, Jared Kushner, Ghislaine Maxwell, Benjamin Netanyahu, are zealots who have collaborated with Trump and infiltrated moles within government to: a) destroy the US, b) prop up Israel, and c) prepare the stage to welcome back Satan. There are many key Israel loyalists in the US Congress and this infiltration is right out of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...0x800.jpeg

Treason is what these dual-citizen members of Congress are guilty of. Some of the notable ones are or have been: Barbara Boxer, Al Franken, Joseph Lieberman, Eric Cantor, Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, Stephen Cohen, Jerry Nadler, Adam Schiff, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Henry Waxman and Anthony Wiener among others. The ends justify the means for these Zionists, and they’ve even made laws to make it illegal in more than half US states to even criticize Israel.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...8x960.jpeg

This Khazarian group is known today as the Khazarian Mafia. They’ve used infiltration around the world as the Protocols dictate by marrying into royal families, infiltrating the elite of society as media members, politicians, intelligence agents, and as doctors, lawyers, academics, and scientists. Their preferred members are blood related, but many achieve status through lodges and meritocracy.

Their dream New World Order capital is already built and ready for occupation in Kazakhstan. In what can only be seen as an occult wet-dream laden with symbolism, their shining city of Astana – partial ambigram of Satan – is replete with twin gold pillars down the main capital causeway, pyramid & dome architecture, golden suspended globes, and all-seeing eye motifs. Central tower, Bairterek Tower harkens to the power eye of Mordor.

Who we are fighting
These are the evildoers in the world. And they have sway over the Order of the Black Sun, most royal families, and most countries. There are Satanists within all leadership of countries. Their wish is to go public with Satan worship. If you notice some of the Biden administration new hires, they are just that. This notion of going public is the case offered by former Grand Wizard of the KKK, Albert Pike in his treatise, Morals and Dogmas.

The rulers are aware of the choices they make on behalf of their people. But it’s important to note that the people of the occupied country are duped into their beliefs much as Americans are duped into believing that they are bringing democracy to the world. And as Europeans are now protesting governments in large numbers, the demon crazy (democrazy >> democracy) leaders have made their allegiance and believe that they have no way out. Their mental programming is complete and they are willing to go down with the ship. But they will not go alone. If they are going to go down – which is happening to many – they will continue with their plans. This is where we find ourselves now.

Their plans are to create chaos. In our next piece, let us examine what chaos they are executing.

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

https://prepareforchange.net/2023/06/12/...ybrid-war/

https://www.truth11.com/untitled-1105/

WEF Calls for AI to Rewrite Bible, Create ‘Religions That Are Actually Correct’

https://slaynews.com/wp-content/uploads/...ble-ai.jpg

A top official with the World Economic Forum (WEF) has called for religious scripture to be “rewritten” by artificial intelligence (AI) to create a globalized “new Bible.”

Yuval Noah Harari, the senior advisor to the WEF and its chairman Klaus Schwab, argues that using AI to replace scriptures will create unified “religions that are actually correct.”

Harari, an influential author and professor, made the call while giving a talk on the “future of humanity.”

According to Harari, the power of AI can be harnessed and used to reshape spirituality into the WEF’s globalist vision of “equity” and inclusivism.

Speaking with journalist Pedro Pinto in Lisbon, Portugal, Harari told the elitist audience:

“It’s the first technology ever that can create new ideas.

“You know, the printing press, radio, television, they broadcast, they spread the ideas created by the human brain, by the human mind.

“They cannot create a new idea.

“You know, [Johannes] Gutenberg printed the Bible in the middle of the 15th century; the printing press printed as many copies of the Bible as Gutenberg instructed it, but it did not create a single new page.

“It had no ideas of its own about the Bible: Is it good? Is it bad? How to interpret this? How to interpret that?”

Harari then revealed that he and his allies at the WEF have a solution to the supposed problems he’d just highlighted.

“AI can create new ideas; [it] can even write a new Bible,” he declared.

“Throughout history, religions dreamt about having a book written by a superhuman intelligence, by a non-human entity,” he added.

“In a few years, there might be religions that are actually correct … just think about a religion whose holy book is written by an AI.

“That could be a reality in a few years.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hIlDiVDww4

Harari noted in another recent gathering that software like ChatGPT has mastered human languages and can harness that function to influence culture, the Times of Israel said.

“For thousands of years, prophets and poets and politicians have used language and storytelling in order to manipulate and to control people and to reshape society,” he said, according to the paper.

“Now AI is likely to be able to do it.

“And once it can… it doesn’t need to send killer robots to shoot us.

“It can get humans to pull the trigger.”

Harari also said that “contrary to what some conspiracy theories assume, you don’t really need to implant chips in people’s brains in order to control them or to manipulate them,” the paper noted.

He also warned that “we need to act quickly before AI gets out of our control” and that “governments must immediately ban the release into the public domain of any more revolutionary AI tools before they are made safe,” the paper added.

Harari frequently pushes ideas that involve humanity being replaced by machines.

As Slay News previously reported, Harari gloated last year that “we just don’t need the vast majority of the population” in today’s world.

According to Harari, most of the general public has now become “redundant” and will be of little use to the global elite in the future.

Harari argues that modern technologies like artificial intelligence “make it possible to replace the people.”

“If you go back to the middle of the 20th century — and it doesn’t matter if you’re in the United States with Roosevelt, or if you’re in Germany with Hitler, or even in the USSR with Stalin — and you think about building the future, then your building materials are those millions of people who are working hard in the factories, in the farms, the soldiers,” Harari said.

“You need them.

“Now, fast forward to the early 21st century when we just don’t need the vast majority of the population,” he added.

“The future is about developing more and more sophisticated technology, like artificial intelligence [and] bioengineering.

“Most people don’t contribute anything to that, except perhaps for their data, and whatever people are still doing which is useful, these technologies increasingly will make redundant and will make it possible to replace the people.”

https://slaynews.com/news/wef-ai-rewrite...y-correct/

How To Remove Graphene Nanobots

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e...0.png.webp

The Exposé

In an era marked by the infiltration of graphene nanomaterials/nanobots into various aspects of our lives, concerns over their potential health implications have grown. The inadvertent exposure to graphene and its potential accumulation in the body has raised questions about how to effectively remove this powerful material.

From their ability to manipulate biological processes and disrupt normal physiological functions to their potential for widespread transmission and long-term health consequences, the implications are deeply unsettling.

Sadly, one doctor has already proven that Graphene Nanobots are within the mRNA Covid-19 injections. But what’s even more upsetting, is that he has also concluded that they are being transmitted from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated, destroying red blood cells and forming strange and rare blood clots.

So as the prevalence of graphene nanomaterials continues to increase, understanding how to safely remove them from the body becomes crucial. Thankfully, there are already several known ways to do so.

The Enigma of Graphene NanoBots:

Hidden within the depths of COVID-19 vaccines, an enigma awaits discovery: graphene nanobots. These microscopic entities, composed of graphene oxide, possess a dark agenda that threatens human health and autonomy.

In the vast landscape of scientific advancements, one enigma stands out: graphene nanobots. These microscopic entities, crafted from the extraordinary material known as graphene, have captivated the imaginations of researchers and innovators worldwide. Yet, behind their seemingly miraculous potential lies a disturbing and ominous reality—one that could shape the future of humanity in unforeseen and treacherous ways.

Graphene, a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a two-dimensional lattice, possesses remarkable properties that have paved the way for revolutionary breakthroughs in various fields. Its strength, flexibility, and conductivity make it a coveted material for applications ranging from electronics to medicine. However, the integration of graphene into nanobots takes this technological marvel to a whole new level.

These minuscule robots, driven by the power of nanotechnology, possess the ability to navigate the intricate terrain of our bodies with unprecedented precision. Their potential applications appear endless: targeted drug delivery, tissue repair, disease detection, and even neural interfaces. But as with any profound technological advancement, questions arise about the potential risks and unintended consequences that may accompany these seemingly remarkable creations.

One concerning aspect of graphene nanobots lies in their potential for infiltration and manipulation. As they navigate through our bloodstream, these microscopic agents have the capacity to interact with our cells, tissues, and even our DNA. The prospect of intentional manipulation or unintended side effects raises alarms about the invasion of our bodily autonomy and the potential for irreversible harm.

Furthermore, the implications of the widespread deployment and utilization of graphene nanobots in society are shrouded in ambiguity. The possibility of surreptitious surveillance, tracking, or alteration of our physical and cognitive functions becomes a disconcerting reality. As these nanobots become more integrated into our daily lives, the line between human agency and technological control blurs, giving rise to a dystopian world where our very essence is manipulated and exploited.

The enigma of graphene nanobots deepens as questions emerge about who holds the power to create and control these microscopic entities. Are they solely in the hands of benevolent scientists and innovators striving for the betterment of humanity?

Or do hidden agendas lurk behind closed doors, driven by the thirst for control and domination? Unravelling this mystery requires a critical examination of the forces at play and the underlying power dynamics that shape the development and deployment of graphene nanobots.

In our pursuit of scientific progress, we must tread cautiously and ethically. Transparency, accountability, and open dialogue become crucial to ensure that the potential dangers of graphene nanobots are acknowledged, addressed, and mitigated. Safeguards must be implemented to protect individual rights, privacy, and bodily autonomy in a world increasingly entwined with advanced technologies.

As we navigate the enigma of graphene nanobots, we must remain vigilant, questioning the motives and consequences of their existence. In the pursuit of a better future, we must weigh the benefits against the potential risks and tread the path of progress with wisdom and discernment.

Sources:

    Li, X., et al. (2020). Graphene-based nanobots for biomedical applications: A review. Nanoscale, 12(18), 9708-9720.
    Rajendran, V. (2021). Ethical Implications of Nanotechnology and Its Applications. Frontiers in Nanotechnology, 2, 631984.
    Chen, X., et al. (2021). Recent Advances in Graphene-Based Nanobots for Biomedical Applications. Small, 17(9), 2005497.
    Liu, Y., et al. (2020). Design Strategies and Applications of Graphene-Based Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications. Small Methods, 4(5), 1900817.

Unmasking the Silent Destroyers:

As our investigation intensifies, startling evidence emerges, linking graphene nanobots to a range of nightmarish consequences.

But how does graphene end up in COVID-19 vaccines in the first place?

It is through the secretive manufacturing process, shrouded in layers of deception.

The confirmation can be found in a document submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to gain Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). A document that the FDA did not want to release for a minimum of 75 years, but were thankfully forced to by a federal judge.

The document confirms it is perfectly possible for toxic Graphene Oxide to end up in the Covid-19 vaccines due to the manufacturing process.

A full breakdown of the document can be viewed here.

But the document in question confirms it is perfectly possible for toxic Graphene Oxide to end up in the Covid-19 vaccines due to the manufacturing process.

In early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month of documents submitted by Pfizer, and since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website as they have been published.

Sadly, one of the most recent documents published by the FDA, saved as 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf, confirms the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. Proving that medicine regulators the mainstream media, Fact Checkers and Pfizer have all been lying to you.

The document is a description of a study carried out by Pfizer between April 7th 2020 and 19th August 2020, with the objective being “to express and characterize the vaccine antigen encoded by BNT162b2.”

In layman’s terms, the study was conducted to determine how the vaccine works. The study found that the vaccine used mRNA to instruct your cells to produce a protein (called P2 S), which is the Spike protein of the alleged Covd-19 virus.

The millions of spike proteins then bind to a receptor called ACE2 on the surface of your cells, inducing an immune system response.

But what is most concerning about the study is the confirmation on page 7 that Graphene Oxide is required to manufacture the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

Pfizer states on page 7 of the study in section 3.4 the following –

Therefore, during the manufacturing process, several factors could potentially introduce contaminants or foreign materials into the vaccine. This obviously includes the possibility of varying amounts of Graphene Oxide (GO) entering the final product.

In their relentless pursuit of control, the establishment has hidden the truth from the public. They have concealed the presence of graphene, a material with potentially grave implications, within the vaccine formulations.

This deliberate act of deception highlights the lengths to which the establishment will go to push its agenda while suppressing vital information that could threaten its power.

In the vast realm of scientific innovation, a silent menace lurks in the shadows: graphene nanobots. These inconspicuous agents, forged from the incredible material known as graphene, possess an insidious power that can wreak havoc on our very existence. As the world marvels at the promises of this revolutionary technology, it is imperative that we unmask the true nature of these microscopic entities and confront the chilling implications they hold for humanity.

Graphene, with its exceptional properties and incredible strength, has captivated the scientific community. But when this formidable material is harnessed to create nanobots, a sinister undercurrent emerges. These nanoscale machines, driven by the power of graphene, have the potential to infiltrate our bodies undetected, becoming a silent army of destroyers.

Once inside, graphene nanobots can unleash a cascade of devastation. They possess the ability to interact with our cells, tissues, and even our genetic makeup, effectively becoming malicious intruders within our very being. These tiny assassins can wreak havoc on our biological systems, causing unprecedented damage and irreparable harm.

One of the most horrifying aspects of graphene nanobots is their ability to manipulate and control our bodily functions. Imagine a scenario where these insidious agents override our natural systems, dictating our thoughts, emotions, and physical actions. Our autonomy is stripped away, we become mere puppets in the hands of these malevolent forces. The prospect of a dystopian world where our every move is orchestrated by these silent destroyers is a chilling thought indeed.

The ramifications of the widespread deployment of graphene nanobots extend far beyond individual autonomy. These microscopic entities can be programmed to carry out nefarious agendas, serving as covert agents of surveillance, control, and even annihilation. The potential for their misuse in the hands of those seeking power and domination is a terrifying reality that must not be ignored.

The manufacturing process of these graphene nanobots also raises profound concerns. Are these minuscule machines being injected into our bodies without our knowledge or consent? Is the public being misled about the true nature and purpose of these technological marvels? The veil of secrecy surrounding their production and distribution demands urgent scrutiny and demands transparency from the entities responsible for their creation.

As we peer into the abyss of graphene nanobots, it becomes clear that their emergence heralds a new era of profound existential threats. The dark underbelly of technological progress reveals itself, casting a shadow over the future of humanity. The power to manipulate, control, and destroy lies within the invisible hands of these microscopic foes, and it is up to us to rise and confront this terrifying reality.

Sources:

    Chen, J., et al. (2021). Graphene-based nanobots for biomedical applications: From targeted drug delivery to cancer therapy. Nano Today, 38, 101148.
    Zhang, Z., et al. (2020). Graphene-Based Nanobots: Theoretical Design and Fabrication. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 126.
    Kostarelos, K., et al. (2017). Graphene-based materials for biomedical applications. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 56(33), 8745-8760.
    Vabbina, P. K., et al. (2021). Graphene-based nanobots: A review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 141, 116268.

The Alarming Discoveries:

Renowned nanotechnology expert, Dr. Philippe van Welbergen, has made groundbreaking strides in uncovering the truth about graphene nanoparticles and their potential presence in COVID-19 vaccines.

Through meticulous analysis of vaccine samples, Dr. van Welbergen has detected disturbing indications of graphene’s involvement, raising concerns about its impact on human health.

His findings correlate the presence of graphene with the emergence of perplexing blood clotting disorders and the destruction of essential red blood cells. These revelations demand urgent attention and further investigation into the safety and long-term consequences of graphene-containing injections.

Below is an image of typical healthy red blood cells as seen with a microscope, what blood should look like. There is no coagulation or foreign objects in it.

Strange Blood Clots and Vascular Disturbances: One of the alarming discoveries surrounding graphene nanobots is their association with the formation of unusual blood clots and vascular disturbances.

Scientific investigations have revealed that these tiny agents, when introduced into the bloodstream, have the capacity to trigger abnormal clotting mechanisms, leading to potentially life-threatening complications.

The interaction between graphene and blood components can disrupt normal coagulation processes, jeopardizing cardiovascular health and increasing the risk of strokes, heart attacks, and other vascular disorders.

THe following is of a person who has been injected with the experimental Covid vaccine.

The blood is coagulated, and the misshapen red blood cells are clumped together. The cell encircled in the image is a healthy red blood cell, one of the few in the image, sitting alongside the graphene fibres.

You can see the size of the graphene fibres in relation to the size of a red blood cell. Fibres of this size will block capillaries. You can also see the graphene fibres are hollow and contain red blood cells.

Destruction of Red Blood Cells: Further research has uncovered the distressing capability of graphene nanobots to destroy red blood cells.

These vital carriers of oxygen are essential for maintaining overall health and well-being. However, when exposed to graphene nanobots, red blood cells may undergo significant damage, impairing their ability to transport oxygen efficiently.

This disruption can have far-reaching consequences, ranging from reduced energy levels and impaired cognitive function to compromised organ health and diminished overall vitality.

Transmission from the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated: Recent studies have also raised concerns about the potential transmission of graphene nanobots from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated population.

While the primary purpose of vaccination is to confer protection against specific diseases, there have been unsettling reports suggesting that graphene nanobots, used in some vaccine manufacturing processes, could be inadvertently transmitted to individuals who have not received the vaccine.

This raises profound ethical questions about the dissemination of untested and potentially harmful nanomaterials within the population.

The image below is of a blood sample from a vaccine-free, or unvaccinated, three-year-old child.  It shows pieces or “shards” of graphene that “are the result of shedding,” in other words the graphene has been transmitted from “vaccinated” parents to their unvaccinated child.

Below is the image of a blood sample from an eight-year-old unvaccinated child whose blood has been contaminated and destroyed by the transmission of graphene from those around him/her who have had a Covid injection.  The child’s right arm and upper right leg are basically paralysed, the child is unable to lift his/her right arm and the thigh is not functioning properly.

The Elusive Dystopian Future: These alarming discoveries bring us face-to-face with the potential dystopian future that could unfold if the sinister capabilities of graphene nanobots go unchecked.

From their ability to manipulate biological processes and disrupt normal physiological functions to their potential for widespread transmission and long-term health consequences, the implications are deeply unsettling.

The unintended consequences of unregulated and inadequately tested nanotechnology could pave the way for a future where our bodies and well-being are subject to manipulation by unseen forces.

Sources:

    Zhang, Y., Ali, S. F., & Dervishi, E. (2021). Graphene-based nanomaterials and their potential toxicological effects: A review. Environmental Science: Nano, 8(3), 596-614.
    Moein, M. M., Nejati-Koshki, K., & Akbarzadeh, A. (2021). Graphene oxide: A unique material for drug delivery applications. Nanotechnology Reviews, 10(1),
    https://expose-news.com/2023/03/08/docto...ood-cells/

The Troubling Phenomenon of Graphene Transmission:

As the investigation unfolds, an even more chilling revelation emerges. Evidence suggests the potential transmission of graphene nanoparticles from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated, raising alarming questions about the unintended consequences of mass vaccination campaigns.

This phenomenon, if confirmed, holds significant implications for the unsuspecting unvaccinated population. It underscores the urgent need for comprehensive studies to determine the extent and consequences of graphene transmission, as well as the potential risks posed to vulnerable individuals.

Within the realm of graphene nanobots, a troubling phenomenon has emerged — the potential transmission of these microscopic agents from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated.

This revelation has profound implications for public health, raising concerns about the unintended consequences and ethical implications of widespread graphene exposure.

    Transmission Mechanisms: Scientific investigations have uncovered several potential mechanisms through which graphene nanobots could be transmitted from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated population. These include:

    Respiratory Transmission: Inhalation of graphene-containing particles, whether through respiratory droplets or aerosols, can serve as a potential route of transmission. The microscopic size of graphene nanobots allows them to be easily dispersed in the air, raising concerns about the potential for inhalation exposure.
    Direct Contact: Close contact between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals can provide an opportunity for the transfer of graphene nanobots. Skin-to-skin contact or contact with contaminated surfaces may facilitate the transmission of these nanomaterials.

    Ethical Concerns: The transmission of graphene nanobots from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated raises profound ethical concerns. Vaccination programs are primarily aimed at conferring protection against specific diseases, with the understanding that the benefits outweigh the risks.However, the inadvertent transmission of graphene nanobots introduces a new dimension to the ethical debate surrounding vaccination. The potential for untested and potentially harmful nanomaterials to be disseminated within the population without informed consent raises questions about transparency, accountability, and individual autonomy.
    Health Implications: The health implications of graphene transmission are still being explored, but initial findings raise concerns about the potential risks involved. Graphene nanobots, if transmitted to the unvaccinated, could pose various health risks, including:

    Organ Dysfunction: The interaction between graphene nanobots and biological systems may disrupt normal organ function, potentially leading to organ dysfunction and long-term health consequences.
    Inflammatory Responses: Graphene nanobots have been shown to elicit inflammatory responses within the body, which can contribute to a range of health issues, including chronic inflammation and related diseases.
    Immune Dysregulation: The presence of graphene nanobots in the body may perturb the delicate balance of the immune system, potentially leading to immune dysregulation and increased susceptibility to infections or autoimmune disorders.

The troubling phenomenon of graphene transmission raises significant questions about the unintended consequences and ethical implications of nanotechnology deployment.

As we navigate the challenges posed by emerging technologies, it is crucial to prioritize thorough research, stringent safety assessments, and ethical considerations. Transparent communication, comprehensive risk assessments, and informed consent are essential to mitigate potential risks and ensure the responsible development and deployment of nanotechnologies.

By addressing the troubling phenomenon of graphene transmission, we can foster informed discussions, empower individuals, and advocate for the responsible implementation of nanotechnological advancements.

Sources:

    Zhang, Y., Ali, S. F., & Dervishi, E. (2021). Graphene-based nanomaterials and their potential toxicological effects: A review. Environmental Science: Nano, 8(3), 596-614.
    Liao, K. H., Lin, Y. S., Macosko, C. W., & Haynes, C. L. (2011). Cytotoxicity of graphene oxide and graphene in human erythrocytes and skin fibro

A Dystopian Future Unveiled:

The implications of graphene nanobots extend far beyond the realm of physical health. They hint at a dystopian future where individual autonomy is compromised, and control rests in the hands of those who deploy these microscopic spies.

The potential for surveillance, manipulation, and even societal subjugation looms large, eroding the very fabric of our free will.

In a world teetering on the edge of uncertainty, a chilling and dystopian reality emerges as the sinister intersection of graphene nanobots, mRNA technology, and nanotechnology comes into focus.

Deep within the shadows of scientific advancements, a dangerous path unfolds, threatening the very fabric of our existence. As we delve into the depths of this dark realm, the truth unravels before our eyes, exposing a web of manipulation, control, and potential catastrophe. Brace yourself as we embark on a journey into a dystopian future where the line between science fiction and reality becomes disturbingly blurred.

Graphene, a remarkable material with extraordinary properties, has captured the attention of researchers and scientists around the world. Its exceptional strength, electrical conductivity, and flexibility have paved the way for innovative applications across various industries. However, lurking beneath its seemingly limitless potential lies a potential for misuse and manipulation that could reshape the very essence of humanity.

The integration of graphene into nanotechnology opens a Pandora’s box of possibilities. Nanobots, tiny robotic devices engineered to perform specific tasks at the nanoscale, have emerged as a powerful tool in medicine, environmental remediation, and beyond.

With the incorporation of graphene, these nanobots gain enhanced capabilities, making them potentially more efficient and versatile. However, these advancements come at a grave cost, as the line between augmentation and control blurs, paving the way for a dystopian future where our bodies and minds become subject to manipulation and surveillance.

The convergence of graphene, mRNA technology, and nanotechnology in the realm of medicine presents a new frontier fraught with peril. mRNA technology, the backbone of the revolutionary COVID-19 vaccines, holds the promise of personalized medicine and targeted therapies.

However, when combined with graphene nanobots, a sinister potential emerges. These nanobots, capable of navigating through our bloodstream and even crossing the blood-brain barrier, could be manipulated to deliver not only beneficial treatments but also nefarious agents that alter our biology, control our thoughts, or compromise our very essence.

The implications of such a dystopian future are profound and alarming. Our personal autonomy, privacy, and freedom hang in the balance as powerful entities gain unprecedented control over our bodies and minds.

The potential for widespread surveillance, manipulation of emotions and thoughts, and the erosion of our individuality become hauntingly real. As we surrender ourselves to a world governed by technology and its masters, the question arises: Are we unwittingly trading our humanity for the illusion of progress?

In the face of this dark future, the need for vigilance, critical thinking, and ethical decision-making becomes paramount. We must question the motivations and intentions behind the integration of graphene nanobots, mRNA technology, and nanotechnology.

Transparency, accountability, and safeguards must be established to ensure that these powerful tools are used for the betterment of humanity rather than its subjugation.

As we confront this bleak reality, we must question the motives of those who champion this technology and demand transparency, accountability, and ethical considerations that prioritize the well-being and agency of individuals.

Sources:

    Smith, J. A., & Anderson, K. L. (2020). Graphene Nanobots: A New Frontier in Medicine. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 28, 102210.
    Sui, N., Wu, W., Ma, H., Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., Dong, X., & Yu, C. (2019). Graphene-Based Nanobots: Theoretical Design and Applications. Nanomaterials, 9(4), 592.
    Rossi, S., & Ferrari, A. C. (2019). Graphene Nanobots: Buried Treasure or Pandora’s Box? ACS Nano, 13(8), 8919-8922.
    National Nanotechnology Initiative. (n.d.). Applications. Retrieved from https://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/special
    The Guardian. (2021). Gene editing and ‘smart drugs’ will be big health issues in the next decade. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021...ext-decade

Escaping the Clutches of Graphene Nanobots:

Finding an escape from the clutches of graphene nanobots becomes a paramount concern for those who yearn for freedom and bodily sovereignty.

While the path to liberation may not be clear-cut, there are steps one can take to minimize exposure and assist in the elimination of these insidious particles.

Detoxification protocols, such as heavy metal chelation, show promise in aiding the removal of graphene from the body. Embracing a holistic lifestyle supporting the body’s natural detoxification processes through nourishing foods, regular exercise, and stress reduction may also be beneficial.

In the vast realm of scientific innovation, a silent menace lurks in the shadows: graphene nanobots. These inconspicuous agents, forged from the incredible material known as graphene, possess an insidious power that can wreak havoc on our very existence. As the world marvels at the promises of this revolutionary technology, it is imperative that we unmask the true nature of these microscopic entities and confront the chilling implications they hold for humanity.

Graphene, with its exceptional properties and incredible strength, has captivated the scientific community. But when this formidable material is harnessed to create nanobots, a sinister undercurrent emerges. These nanoscale machines, driven by the power of graphene, have the potential to infiltrate our bodies undetected, becoming a silent army of destroyers.

Once inside, graphene nanobots can unleash a cascade of devastation. They possess the ability to interact with our cells, tissues, and even our genetic makeup, effectively becoming malicious intruders within our very being. These tiny assassins can wreak havoc on our biological systems, causing unprecedented damage and irreparable harm.

One of the most horrifying aspects of graphene nanobots is their ability to manipulate and control our bodily functions. Imagine a scenario where these insidious agents override our natural systems, dictating our thoughts, emotions, and physical actions. Our autonomy is stripped away, we become mere puppets in the hands of these malevolent forces. The prospect of a dystopian world where our every move is orchestrated by these silent destroyers is a chilling thought indeed.

The ramifications of the widespread deployment of graphene nanobots extend far beyond individual autonomy. These microscopic entities can be programmed to carry out nefarious agendas, serving as covert agents of surveillance, control, and even annihilation. The potential for their misuse in the hands of those seeking power and domination is a terrifying reality that must not be ignored.

The manufacturing process of these graphene nanobots also raises profound concerns. Are these minuscule machines being injected into our bodies without our knowledge or consent? Is the public being misled about the true nature and purpose of these technological marvels? The veil of secrecy surrounding their production and distribution demands urgent scrutiny and demands transparency from the entities responsible for their creation.

As we peer into the abyss of graphene nanobots, it becomes clear that their emergence heralds a new era of profound existential threats. The dark underbelly of technological progress reveals itself, casting a shadow over the future of humanity. The power to manipulate, control, and destroy lies within the invisible hands of these microscopic foes, and it is up to us to rise and confront this terrifying reality

    Chen, J., et al. (2021). Graphene-based nanobots for biomedical applications: From targeted drug delivery to cancer therapy. Nano Today, 38, 101148.
    Zhang, Z., et al. (2020). Graphene-Based Nanobots: Theoretical Design and Fabrication. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 126.
    Kostarelos, K., et al. (2017). Graphene-based materials for biomedical applications. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 56(33), 8745-8760.
    Vabbina, P. K., et al. (2021). Graphene-based nanobots: A review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 141, 116268.

Detoxification Strategies: Safely Eliminating Graphene from the Body

In an era marked by the infiltration of graphene nanomaterials into various aspects of our lives, concerns over their potential health implications have grown. The inadvertent exposure to graphene and its potential accumulation in the body has raised questions about how to effectively remove this powerful material.

Here we delve into the strategies and approaches that can aid in the safe and efficient elimination of graphene from the body.

By understanding these methods, individuals can take proactive steps to protect their well-being and reduce the potential long-term effects of graphene exposure.

    Enhanced Detoxification Pathways: One of the primary approaches to facilitate the removal of graphene from the body is to support the natural detoxification pathways. Several techniques can be employed to optimize the functioning of organs involved in detoxification, such as the liver, kidneys, and lymphatic system.These include:

    Hydration: Drinking an adequate amount of water supports kidney function and promotes the elimination of toxins, including graphene particles, through urine.
    Liver Support: Consuming foods rich in antioxidants, such as berries and leafy greens, can aid in liver function and enhance the detoxification process.
    Sweating: Engaging in activities that induce sweating, such as exercise or sauna sessions, can help eliminate toxins through the skin.

    Dietary Interventions: Certain dietary strategies can assist in the removal of graphene from the body. These include:

    High-Fiber Diet: Consuming a fiber-rich diet aids in regular bowel movements and facilitates the elimination of toxins, including graphene, through the digestive system.
    Detoxifying Foods: Incorporating foods with natural detoxifying properties, such as garlic, cilantro, and cruciferous vegetables like broccoli and Brussels sprouts, can support the body’s ability to eliminate harmful substances.

    Chelation Therapy: Chelation therapy involves the administration of chelating agents that bind to heavy metals and other toxins, facilitating their removal from the body. While research specifically on chelation therapy for graphene removal is limited, certain chelators, such as EDTA (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid), have shown potential in removing various heavy metals from the body.
    Supportive Supplements: Certain supplements may help support the body’s natural detoxification processes and promote the elimination of graphene particles. These include:

    Glutathione: Known as the body’s master antioxidant, glutathione plays a crucial role in detoxification. Supplementing with glutathione or its precursors, such as N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), may support the body’s ability to remove toxins.
    Vitamin C: As a potent antioxidant, vitamin C can help neutralize oxidative stress caused by graphene exposure and support overall detoxification processes.

    Seeking Professional Guidance: Given the limited research on specific methods to remove graphene from the body, it is advisable to consult with healthcare professionals knowledgeable in environmental toxicology or detoxification. They can provide personalized guidance based on individual circumstances and recommend appropriate strategies for graphene detoxification.

As the prevalence of graphene nanomaterials continues to increase, understanding how to safely remove them from the body becomes crucial.

While research on specific detoxification protocols for graphene is still emerging, supporting natural detoxification pathways, adopting a healthy diet, considering chelation therapy, and incorporating supportive supplements can aid in the elimination of graphene particles.

However, it is important to approach graphene detoxification with caution and seek guidance from healthcare professionals with expertise in the field.

By taking proactive steps to mitigate the potential effects of graphene exposure, individuals can strive for optimal well-being in an increasingly graphene-infused world.
The Call for Vigilance and Action:

In the face of this dystopian nightmare, it is essential for individuals to remain vigilant, informed, and engaged. Our collective power lies in demanding transparency, independent research, and rigorous scrutiny of emerging technologies.

We must resist complacency and challenge the forces that seek to subjugate us under the guise of progress. By harnessing the power of knowledge, critical thinking, and unity, we can forge a future that prioritizes human well-being, and individual freedoms, and safeguards against the insidious grasp of graphene nanobots.

As the encroachment of graphene nanobots continues, the urgent need for vigilance and action becomes increasingly apparent. This silent invasion demands a steadfast response from individuals, communities, and global institutions alike. The battle to protect ourselves and preserve our future hinges on our ability to recognize the threat, mobilize resources, and implement strategic measures.

To heed the call for vigilance, we must first delve into the depths of graphene nanobots’ nefarious capabilities. These tiny agents, propelled by the remarkable properties of graphene, possess the potential to infiltrate our bodies through various means, including injection, inhalation, or ingestion. Once inside, they exploit their graphene-driven mechanisms to propagate, evade detection, and wreak havoc on our biological systems.

The consequences of complacency in the face of this existential threat are dire. Graphene nanobots have been linked to a range of adverse health effects, from debilitating inflammation and organ dysfunction to cellular damage and systemic imbalances. Their ability to manipulate our physiology, evade immune responses, and propagate within our bodies poses a grave risk to our well-being.

To confront this onslaught, a multi-faceted approach is necessary. Education and awareness form the cornerstone of our defence. By disseminating accurate information about graphene nanobots, their potential sources, and the health risks they pose, we empower individuals to make informed decisions and take proactive measures to safeguard their well-being.

Research and development efforts must be accelerated to understand the mechanisms of graphene nanobots and devise countermeasures. Robust scientific investigations, conducted independently of corporate influence, are vital in unraveling the complexities of this technological menace. Collaborative initiatives between academia, regulatory bodies, and health organizations are essential to foster innovation and create effective strategies for detection, elimination, and protection.

Moreover, regulatory oversight and accountability must be strengthened to prevent the infiltration of graphene nanobots into consumer products. Stricter regulations and monitoring mechanisms should be implemented to ensure the safety of medical devices, food packaging, personal care products, and other potentially contaminated items. Transparency and rigorous testing protocols become paramount in mitigating the risks associated with these microscopic intruders.

The call for action extends beyond individual efforts. Collaboration at a societal and global level is essential to combat the pervasive threat of graphene nanobots. The establishment of international frameworks for sharing knowledge, coordinating research, and implementing unified strategies is critical in the face of this global challenge. Governments, industry leaders, and scientific communities must join forces to pool resources, fund research initiatives, and drive meaningful change.

The fight against graphene nanobots requires not only reactive measures but also proactive steps to prevent their proliferation. Ethical considerations and responsible innovation in the development and use of nanotechnology become imperative. Strict adherence to safety protocols, ethical guidelines, and comprehensive risk assessments should underpin the advancement of this technology, ensuring its alignment with human well-being and societal benefit.

As we stand on the precipice of a dystopian future, the call for vigilance and action resonates louder than ever. It is a rallying cry for each individual to become a guardian of their own health, a defender of truth, and an advocate for change. By remaining vigilant, demanding accountability, and taking collective action, we can safeguard our future and preserve the sanctity of humanity.
Conclusion:

The presence of graphene in COVID vaccines due to the manufacturing process raises serious concerns about the potential toxic effects on the human body.

The alarming discoveries surrounding the use of graphene nanobots in vaccines and their potential transmission from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated demand immediate attention.

As we navigate this complex landscape, it is imperative to address the risks associated with graphene exposure and understand how to safely remove it from the body.

The inadvertent presence of graphene in COVID vaccines highlights the need for transparency and rigorous safety assessments in the manufacturing process. The public deserves accurate information regarding the potential risks and benefits of nanomaterials in vaccines, allowing individuals to make informed decisions about their health.

The toxic effects of graphene on the body cannot be ignored. From the formation of abnormal blood clots and vascular disturbances to the destruction of red blood cells, graphene poses significant health risks that require thorough investigation.

The potential transmission of graphene nanobots from vaccinated to unvaccinated individuals adds another layer of concern, prompting critical ethical discussions about informed consent and the unintended consequences of vaccination programs.

To address these pressing issues, it is essential to prioritize research and develop comprehensive strategies for the removal of graphene from the body. While specific methods for safely eliminating graphene are still emerging, enhancing natural detoxification pathways, adopting a healthy diet, and considering chelation therapy are potential avenues worth exploring.

Seeking professional guidance from experts in environmental toxicology or detoxification can provide valuable insights and personalized recommendations.

As we strive for a better future, it is crucial to advocate for transparency, accountability, and responsible innovation. Robust regulations and independent oversight are necessary to ensure the safety of nanomaterials used in vaccine manufacturing and other consumer products.

By fostering a climate of open dialogue, promoting scientific integrity, and respecting individual autonomy, we can navigate the challenges posed by graphene exposure and work towards a healthier, more informed society.

In conclusion, the presence of graphene in COVID vaccines raises critical concerns about its potentially toxic effects and the ethical implications of its use.

As we continue to uncover the full extent of the risks associated with graphene exposure, it is crucial to prioritize research, safety assessments, and informed decision-making.

By addressing the challenges head-on, we can strive for a future where scientific progress aligns with human well-being, ensuring that the potential benefits of nanotechnology are realized while minimizing potential harm.

https://expose-news.com/2023/06/09/how-t...-nanobots/

Deadly Viral Pandemics Are Not Possible • They Are A Big Pharma Globalist Fraud Construct To Impose Totalitarianism On Us All

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e...7_18-1.jpg

Tap News  | Danceaway

Global Research

Dr. C. Stephen Frost

Briefly, as a medical doctor, it is my opinion that deadly viral pandemics are not possible, and are likely a Big Pharma/globalist construct/fraud.

Additionally, the “gain of function” narrative which is being put about is likely false and is intended to bolster the story that deadly pandemics caused by viruses (given that one accepts that viruses exist), both man-made and naturally occurring, can occur, when that is not possible.

There was no pandemic in 2020, but perhaps more importantly there can be no pandemic of concern in the future.

Some of our friends are leading people astray. It is difficult to be sure that they are not controlled opposition.

Furthermore, just like the Covid-19 fraud, the Ukraine war, climate change, and the “trans nonsense” do not make any sense and are all driven by relentless propaganda/psychological torture and unprecedented censorship which foster dangerous cults.

It follows that we do not need any of their “measures” to control us in their endless fake emergencies.

Furthermore, it is possible that the whole world of virology, genomics, epidemiology and the tyranny of evidence-based medicine were deliberately constructed by our enemies so that the Trojan horse of Covid-19 could be used to kick start the process of imposing totalitarianism on us all, worldwide.

Their aim is to break “social bonds”, historical bonds, cultural bonds, by for example destroying the middle class (the defining feature of so-called democracies) and nation states and family hierarchies, so that people do not want to live any more and thereby die as per the mice in the Universe 25 experiment of the 1960s.

Some of our friends are leading people astray. It is difficult to be sure that they are not controlled opposition.

The people, in countries right across the world, urgently need to be educated about totalitarianism, and the many ways a descent into totalitarianism is being undertaken.

It is preferable to teach people that all the dangerous nonsenses on many different fronts which they are being fed now, and which they will be fed in the future, are manifestations of a dangerous descent into totalitarianism, from which there will be no return.

It is imperative that people fully understand the extreme seriousness of the situation which we are in.

We must fight against everything which looks like tyranny or which might lead to tyranny.

We must learn all we can about totalitarianism and inform our fellow human beings in language that everyone understands, and as quickly as possible.

We thought in our “civilised” Western “democracies”, comfortable and brainwashed as we were, that we would never be visited by a descent into totalitarianism, but we were wrong.

Full blown totalitarianism can and will come to us if we do not fight NOW against it in all its manifestations or preludes.

We were warned by George Orwell and Aldous Huxley, but most people took no notice, because they thought that it did not apply to them or their countries. It does.

https://tapnewswire.com/2023/06/a-big-ph...-possible/

Mercola: How the Censorship Industry Works, and How We Can Stop It

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e....34-AM.png

Dr. Joseph Mercola

I interviewed Mike Benz, executive director for the Foundation for Freedom Online. Benz started off as a corporate lawyer representing tech and media companies before joining the Trump administration, where he worked as a speech writer for Dr. Ben Carson, the former U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and President Trump.

He also advised on economic development policy. He then joined the State Department as Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Communications and Information Technology. There, he ran the cyber desks at state, meaning all things having to do with the internet and foreign policy.

    “This is toward the end of 2020, which was a really fascinating time to witness the merger, in many respects, of big government and big tech companies themselves,” he says. “I had grown up, I think, like many Americans, with a belief that the First Amendment protected you against government censorship.

    The terms of engagement that we had enjoyed from 1991, when the worldwide web rolled out, until 2016, the election in the U.S. and Brexit in the U.K., which is, really, the first political event where the election was determined, in many respects, by momentum on the internet.

    There was that 25-year golden period where the idea of being censored by a private sector company, let alone the government, was considered something, to me, very deeply anathema to the American experience.

    What I witnessed at the State Department — because I was at the desk, basically, that Google and Facebook would call when they wanted favors abroad, when they wanted American protection or American policies to preserve their dominance in Europe, or in Asia or in Latin America.

    And the U.S. government was doing favors for these tech companies while the tech companies were censoring the people who voted for the government. It was a complete betrayal of whatever social contract typically underlies the public-private partnership.”

The Internet Was Founded by the National Security State

Ostensibly, the rapid expansion of censorship started post-2016, but you can make a strong argument that the internet was never intended to remain free forever. Rather, the intention for it to be used as a totalitarian tool was likely baked in from the start when the national security state founded it in 1968.

The worldwide web, which is the user interface, was launched in 1991, and my suspicion is that the public internet was seeded and allowed to grow in order to capture and make the most of the population dependent upon it, knowing that it would be the most effective social engineering tool ever conceived. Benz comments:

    “I totally agree … A lot of people, in trying to understand what’s happening with the net censorship, say ‘We had this free internet, and then suddenly there was this age of censorship and the national security state got involved at the censorship side.’

    But when you retrace the history, internet freedom itself was actually a national security state imperative. The internet itself is a product of a counterinsurgency necessity by the Pentagon to manage information during the 1960s, particularly to aggregate social science data. And then, it was privatized.

    Opening it up to all comers in the private sector, it was handed off from DARPA [the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency] to the National Science Foundation, and then went through a series of universities on the infrastructure side.

    And then, right out of the gate in 1991, you had the Cold War coming to an end, and then simultaneously, you had this profusion of Pentagon-funded internet freedom technologies. You had things like VPNs, encrypted chat, TOR.

    All of the early internet freedom technologies of the ‘90s were funded by the Pentagon, the State Department, and developed by the intelligence community, primarily, as a way of using internet freedom as a means to help dissident groups in foreign countries be able to develop a pro-U.S. beachhead, because it was a way to evade state-controlled media.

    This was, basically, an insurgency tool for the U.S. government, in the same way that Voice of America and Radio Free Liberty, and Radio Free Europe were tools of the CIA in the Cold War, to beam in, basically, pro-U.S. content to populations in foreign countries in order to sway them towards U.S. interests. It was a way of managing the world empire.

    The internet served the same purpose, and it couldn’t be done if it was called a Pentagon operation, a State Department or CIA operation. But all of the tech companies themselves are products of that. Google started as a DARPA grant that was obtained at Stanford by Sergey Brin and Larry Page.

    In 1995, they were part of the CIA and NSA’s [National Security Agency’s] massive digital data program. They had their monthly meetings with their CIA and NSA advisers for that program, where the express stated purpose was for the CIA and NSA to be able to map so-called ‘Birds of a feather’ online … so that they could be neutralized.”

How It All Began

As noted by Benz, the idea of having the intelligence community map political “Birds of a Feather” communities in order to either mobilize or neutralize them was (and still is) justified in the name of counterterrorism. Nowadays, as we’ve seen during the pandemic, it’s used to control public discourse, suppress truth, and promote propaganda angles.

The technology used to control public discourse is an artificial intelligence (AI) technique called natural language processing (NLP). It’s a way of aggregating everyone who believes a certain thing online into community databases based on the words they use, the hashtags, the slogans and images.

    “Emerging narratives, all manner of metadata affiliations, all that can be aggregated to create a topographical network map of what you believe in and who you’re associated with, so that it can all be turned down in a fast, precise and comprehensive manner by content moderation teams, because they’re all birds of the same feather,” Benz explains.

    “The fact that this grew out of the U.S. National Security state, which is running the show, essentially, today, to me says that there’s a continuation between the internet freedom and internet censorship. They simply switched from one side of the chess board to the other.”

What Is the National Security State?

For clarity, when Benz talks about the “National Security State,” what he’s referring to are the institutions that uphold the rules-based international order. Domestically, that includes the Pentagon, State Department, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), certain aspects of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the 17 intelligence agencies.

Of those, the Pentagon, State Department and the intelligence community (IC) are the three central ones that have managed the American world empire since the 1940s. None of them are supposed to be able to operate domestically, but in a sense their power has expanded so much that they essentially control domestic affairs.

As explained by Benz, the Pentagon, State Department and IC are not supposed to be able to operate domestically. “But in a sense, they really control domestic affairs, because their power has expanded so much that they’ve developed an extraordinary laundering apparatus to be able to fund international institutions that then boomerang back home and effectively control much of domestic political affairs, including discourse on the internet.”

As for the CIA, it was created in 1947 under the National Security Act. It was created as a cloak-and-dagger mechanism, to do things the State Department wanted done but couldn’t get caught doing due to the diplomatic repercussions — things like election rigging, assassinations, media control, bribery and other subversion tactics.

The Birth of Hybrid Warfare

Benz continues his explanation of how and why internet censorship emerged when it did:

    “So, there’s the U.S. National Security State, and then there’s the transatlantic one involving NATO. The story of Western government involvement in internet censorship really started after the 2014 Crimea annexation, which was the biggest foreign policy humiliation of the Obama era.

    Atlanta’s School of Foreign Policy was deeply inflamed by this event and blamed the fact that there were these breakaway Russia-supporting entities in Eastern Ukraine and Crimea on a failure to penetrate their media, and this idea that hearts and minds were being swung towards the Russian side because of pro-Russian content online.

    NATO then declared this doctrine of so-called hybrid warfare — this idea that Russia had won Crimea not by a military annexation, but by winning, illicitly in a sense, the hearts and minds of Crimeans through the use of their propaganda. And the doctrine of hybrid warfare, born in 2014, was this idea that war was no longer a kinetic thing.

    There hadn’t been a kinetic war in Europe since World War II. Instead, it had moved sub-kinetic into the hearts and minds of the people. In fact, NATO announced a doctrine after 2014 called ‘From tanks to tweets,’ where it shifted its focus, explicitly, from kinetic warfare to social media opinions online.

    Brexit, which happened in June 2016 … was blamed on Russian influence as well. And so all of these institutions that argued for control over the internet in Eastern Europe said, ‘Well, it needs to come now. Now it’s an all-of-Europe thing.’

    When Trump was then elected five months later, explicitly contemplating the breakup of NATO, all hell broke loose. This idea that we need to censor the internet went from being something that was touchy and novel, in the view of Pentagon brass and State Department folks, to something that was totally essential to saving the entire rules-based international order that came out of World War II.

    At the time, the reasoning was, Brexit, in the U.K., was going to give rise to Frexit, in France, with Marine Le Pen and her movement there. Matteo Salvini was going to cause Italexit In Italy, there’d be Grexit in Greece, Spexit in Spain, and the entire European Union would come undone, just because these right-wing populist parties would naturally vote their way into political power.

    They would vote for working-class, cheap energy policies that would make them more closely aligned with Russia naturally, because of the cheaper oil prices, or cheaper gas prices. Then, suddenly, you’ve got no EU, you’ve got no NATO, and then, you’ve got no Western military alliance.

    So, from that moment, after Trump’s election, immediately, there was this diplomatic roadshow by U.S. State Department officials, who all thought they were getting promotions in November 2016. They thought they were going to get promoted from the State Department to the National Security Council. Turns out, they all got fired, because someone with a 5% chance of winning ended up winning that day.

    So, they took their international connections, their international networks around the Atlanta Council, the Council on Foreign Relations, the entire think tank, quasi-intelligence, quasi-military, government-funded NGO soup, and they did this international roadshow, starting in January 2017, to convince European countries to start censoring their internet …

    Out of that came NetzDG [Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz, the Network Enforcement Act] in Germany, which introduced a necessity of artificial intelligence-powered social media censorship.

    All of that was, essentially, spearheaded by this network of State Department and Pentagon folks who then used their own internal folks in the government to procure government grants and contracts to these same entities. Eventually, they all rotated into those tech companies to set the policies as well.”

Threat From Within

So, to summarize, the infrastructure for worldwide internet censorship was largely established by IC veterans who were forced out by the Trump administration, and that infrastructure was then used to catalyze the international censorship response during COVID in late 2019, early 2020. Benz continues:

    “Right. And those veterans were not alone. The full story is not just the shadow security state and exile. The fact is this. The Trump administration never had control of its own defense department, State Department or intelligence community.

    It was the intelligence community that, essentially, drove his first impeachment, that drove a two-and-a-half year special prosecutor investigation that rolled up 12 to 20 of Trump’s closest associates. You had a chief of staff there who was hiding the military figures from the government. The careers at state threatened the political appointees from the inside. I experienced that myself.

    This permanent aspect of Washington, with unfireable careers in high places, combined with a turf war in the GOP [Republican Party] between the populist right and the neo-conservative right, with the neo-conservative right having many well-placed Republicans in the Defense Department, State Department, in IC, to thwart the previous president’s agenda there, allowed this political network and exile, on the censorship side, to work with their allies within the government to create these censorship beach heads.

    So, for example, that’s how they created the Department of Homeland Security’s … first permanent government censorship bureau in the form of this entity called CISA [the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, founded in November 2018], which is supposed to just be a cybersecurity entity.

    It was done because of media and intelligence community laundering of a never-substantiated claim that Russia had potentially hacked the 2016 election, hacked the election machines or voting software, or might be able to do so in the future, and so we need a robust armed-to-the-teeth DHS unit to protect our cybersecurity from the Russians.

    It’s the mission creep of the century. After the Mueller probe ended in June 2019, this unit, CISA, within DHS [Department of Homeland Security] — which had set up all of this, and which is only supposed to do cybersecurity — said ‘Well, if you squint and look at it, discourse online is a cybersecurity threat because if it undermines public faith or confidence in our elections, and it’s done using a cyber nexus, i.e., social media post, then that’s a form of cybersecurity threat, because democracy is essential to our security.’

    And so you went from this cybersecurity mission to a cyber censorship bureau, because if you tweeted something about mail-in ballots in the 2020 election, that was deemed to be a cyber attack on critical infrastructure, i.e., elections.

    When they got away with that in 2020, DHS then said, ‘Well, if you squint and look at it, public health is also critical infrastructure.’ So, now, DHS gets to direct social media companies to censor opinions about COVID-19.

    Then they worked their way into saying the same thing about financial systems, financial services, about the Ukraine war, about immigration. It got to the point where, by late 2022, the head of CISA declared that cognitive infrastructure is critical infrastructure.”

Cracks only appeared after Republicans got a majority in the House of Representatives in November 2022 and Elon Musk acquired Twitter. Public support for government also dwindled as Musk’s release of the Twitter Files revealed the extent of government’s involvement in the censoring of Americans.

So far, though, public awareness hasn’t changed anything. The very entities that once stood for internet freedom, like the National Science Foundation, are still actively funding and furthering government censorship activities.

AI Gives Censors God-Like Powers

Benz first became “gripped by the stakes of what was happening on the internet” in August 2016, after reading a series of papers discussing the use of NLP to monitor, surveil and regulate the distribution of information on social media based on the words used.

    “DARPA provided tens of millions of dollars of funding for this language processing, this language chunking capacity of AI in order, ostensibly, to stop ISIS recruiting on Facebook and Twitter,” Benz says.

    “As part of the predicate for putting military boots on the ground in Syria, there was a lot of talk about ISIS coming to the U.S., and they were recruiting on Facebook and Twitter. And so the Pentagon, DARPA and the IC developed this language spyware capacity to map the dialectic of how ISIS sympathizers talk online, the words they use, the images they share, the prefixes, the suffixes, all the different community connections.

    And then, I saw that this was being done for purposes of domestic political control instead of foreign counterterrorism, and the power that it has. It is what totally changed the internet forever. Before 2016, there was not the technological capacity to do mass social media censorship. That was the age of what censorship insiders like to call the whack-a-mole era. Censorship was reactive.

    It was done by forum, by moderators, essentially. Everything had to be flagged manually before it could be taken down, which meant millions of people had already seen it, or it had already gone viral, it had already done its damage, so to speak, and you were just cutting off the backend with an act of censorship.

    You could never have a permanent control apparatus in that setting, because there would always be a first mover advantage to whoever posted it. What AI censorship technology breakthroughs enabled after 2016 was a kind of nuclear weapon, if you will, on the censorship side, to be able to end the war immediately.

    You don’t need a standing army of 100,000 people to censor COVID. You need one good developer, working with one manic social scientist who spends her entire life mapping what Dr. Mercola says online, and what he’s talking about this week, what his followers are saying, what they’re saying about this drug, or what they’re saying about this vaccine, or what they’re saying about this institution.

    All of that can be cataloged into a lexicon of how you talk. And then, all of that talk can just be turned down to zero. At the same time, they can super amplify the language that they themselves are doing. So it gives a God-like control to a tiny, tiny, tiny minority of people who can then use that to control the discourse of the entire population.

    What’s also so terrifying about the National Security State’s involvement in this is, when they discovered the power of this by mid-2018, they began to roll it out to every other country in the world for purposes of political control there — to the Ghana desk, to the Ecuador desk, to Southeast Asia, all over Europe.”

Can We Get Out of the Grip of Censorship?

At the time of this writing, we’re in a lull. The COVID pandemic has been declared over and aside from the Russia-Ukraine conflict, there are no major political crises going on that warrant heavy censorship. The networks and technologies for radical suppression are already in place, however, and can be turned up at a moment’s notice.

We’ve also recently seen just how easy it is for alternative media to be infiltrated and upended, so the fact that there are alternative platforms doesn’t guarantee that future censorship efforts will fail.

    “There are so many threat vectors,” Benz says. “There are a lot of questions about what’s going on, for example, at Project Veritas, with how quickly it ousted James O’Keefe after releasing the most viral video ever, on Pfizer. It was about one week later — after their biggest accomplishment, perhaps, ever — that it was totally overthrown.

    A similar thing has happened with Fox News with [the firing of] Tucker Carlson, the most popular cable TV host in the country — the guy who gets three times more concurrent viewership than CNN, in the opposing spot. Institutions can absolutely be penetrated and co-opted when enough pressure is applied.”

Transatlantic Flank Attack 2.0 Underway

As mentioned earlier, the U.S. censorship really began with NATO. Benz refers to this as the transatlantic flank attack. Basically, when U.S. intelligence want to impact the internet domestically, they first work with their European partners to enact regulatory changes in Europe first. This then ends up spilling into the U.S. market, and the IC appears to have had nothing to do with it.

The first transatlantic flank attack took place in early 2017 with the NetzDG. We’re now under transatlantic attack again, through the Digital Markets Act. This law, Benz says, will make it very difficult for Rumble and other free speech platforms to maintain that posture during the next pandemic. Once these platforms are forced to comply with the Digital Markets Act on the European side, the changes will be felt everywhere.

Cause for Cautious Optimism

While Benz remains hopeful that solutions to global censorship will present themselves, he still recognizes that the forces at play are enormous and the risks are high.

    “It’s one of these things where the more you see what we’re up against, the more sobering it becomes. I think you need to maintain hope in order to maintain energy, to maintain momentum. With momentum, weird things can happen, even if you’re not supposed to win. Strange things break, or take a life of their own, or resurface.

    All the little weaknesses of the system get tested, simply by a momentum here and there. For example, Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter is probably the reason that the GOP got over the hump in doing all of these congressional investigations into the government’s role in censorship.

    They felt like they had an ally at Twitter, that they had billionaire backing. There was a waterfall, cascade impact. So, I am hopeful. DHS is on the run right now. They purged their website of all their domestic censorship operations that they listed and were loud and proud about for two whole years after the catastrophe of the disinformation governance board in April 2022.

    They already had a Ministry of Truth at DHS. They just gave one hypothetical board the wrong name. They didn’t call it the CISA. They made the mistake of calling it by the right name, and that’s what ended the entire political support for the underlying apparatus.

    So, the importance of an Orwellian name is essential for maintaining the political support. But I guess what I’m trying to say is, I’m hopeful, and I’m honored to be a part of this rebel fleet of folks trying to take on the empire behind the censorship situation.

    But having seen, in so many iterations the toolkit they use, it is a medieval torture toolkit that can do strange things. Pressure can do strange things, even to great people. And so I’m cautiously optimistic.”

Essential Internet Backbone Is Not Politically Neutral

In my view, internet decentralization is one key innovation that could break the grip of censorship. That said, other aspects, such as cybersecurity, must also be reinvented.

CloudFlare, for example, a content delivery and cloud cybersecurity service, basically controls the internet because they protect online businesses and platforms from hackers using Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks. Without it, you cannot survive online if you’re a big business. Even with a decentralized internet, CloudFlare might still be able to exert control by leaving sites open to DDoS (distributed denial of service) attacks.

Disturbingly, CloudFlare got political for the first time after 2016, when it decided to remove protection from a site called Kiwi Farms, which expressed anti-transgender views. As a result, the site had to move over to a Russian server to get back online.

Basically, U.S. citizens had to look for internet freedom in Russia because their architecture could not be supported in the U.S. — all because a government-integrated backbone of the internet made a political decision, likely at the behest of the IC.

    “If there is another pandemic, for example, and there’s a push for certain medical interventions or countermeasures that certain sites don’t go along with, the CloudFlare, absolutely, could be a weapon in that respect,” Benz says.

    “One of the things I found so troubling is that CISA, this DHS censorship agency, after the 2020 election set up a private sector liaison subcommittee for mis- and disinformation policies in the private sector. It was a seven-person subcommittee, with all of the top censorship experts at the University of Washington and Stanford.

    Vijaya Gadde, the former head of censorship at Twitter, was a part of this board. I thought it was very troubling that the CEO of CloudFlare was also one of the seven people on the DHS censorship board.”

Major Challenges to a Decentralized Internet

Benz continues:

    “To proceed to the various challenges to a decentralized internet, when you move up the stack of censorship … they can move up to cloud servers, to payment processors, and even to things like CloudFlare and your infrastructure protection.

    In the early era of censorship, there was a rebuttal by censorship advocates that if you don’t like what private sector companies are doing, start your own social media companies. Build your own Google, build your own YouTube, build your own Facebook, build your own Twitter.

    And then, what started to happen as censorship got completely insane, when it went from being troubling to disturbing, to saturating … you started to see these alternative social media platforms like Gab and Parler … that tried to escape the content moderation policies with Big Tech. But what started to happen is, those social media companies, like Parler, were completely destroyed.

    Parler was de-platformed from, basically, the entire internet, when the president had just moved there, after being kicked off Twitter. That was a very instructive moment, and one that censorship insiders have reflected on, I should say, many, times as a moment of, ‘Should we have done that? We did it, but it costs us a lot of political capital.’

    Parler was kicked off of Amazon Web Services. They were kicked off of all of the banks. They were banned from email providers. They could not hook to the internet, essentially, to even maintain the ability to post anything there. So, it went from build your own social media company to build your own bank.

    Now you need to build your own bank and get a banking license for the payment processors. You need to build your own email distribution. You need to build your own cloud servers.

    You need to build your own software service providers. And, eventually, are you going to need to lay your own subsea cables across the Atlantic and Pacific oceans? The social media companies didn’t invent the internet. They are superimposed on Pentagon infrastructure.”

The House Needs to Defund the Censorship Industry

Without doubt, there will be another crisis, whether it be another pandemic or war or something else, that will send the censorship machine into full gear yet again. Right now we’re in a lull, so this is the time to think ahead and get prepared. The question is, what can we do? How do we prepare and fight back?

According to Benz, one of the most effective strategies that would have immediate effect, and could be done right now, would be to strip the censorship industry of its government funding. He explains:

    “Right now, there’s a Republican controlled House. The advantage of the House is that it controls appropriations, the purse strings of the federal government. If the House Appropriations Committee took seriously the government subsidization of censorship networks in the private sector, you could defund the speech police, even though, on the AI side, it only takes one good coder to be able to take out an entire political philosophy.

    The fact is, they can only do that job because of an army of social science folks across 45 different U.S. colleges and universities who get paid. There are tens of thousands of them who are paid through the National Science Foundation, through DARPA grants and State Department grants, to map communities online as a matter of social science, and then provide that to the computer scientist to censor it.

    My foundation, the Foundation for Freedom Online, has detailed $100 million, just in the past 18 months, that have gone from the federal government institutions directly into social media censorship insiders. Censorship is not an act anymore, it’s an industry, and you can cripple their capacity building.

    When you pump it full of money, you go from having a couple of people do it, to tens of thousands of people doing it. The censorship capacity is built on an infrastructure of an industry that relies on government to pay for it, and it relies on government to spearhead their penetration into the institutions.

    Right now, there are about eight different congressional committees trying to solve this problem from different aspects. I’ve personally briefed eight different congressional committees … But only a few of those committees are taking it seriously enough to pursue the issue deeply, and where that will shake out remains uncertain.

    CISA worked with dozens of social media companies and private sector cutouts to launder censorship from the government into the private sector, but the institution I worked with more than anyone was the University of Stanford, the Stanford Internet Observatory in particular.

    Jim Jordan’s Weaponization Subcommittee just subpoenaed Stanford for what I call the perfectly preserved First Amendment crime scene. Stanford meticulously kept logs of all of its censorship activities with government officials for the COVID-19 pandemic, and for two election cycles.

    They detailed 66 narratives that they censored online, having to do with everything about vaccines, efficacy of masks, opposition to lockdown mandates. And then, they had a fourth category for conspiracy theories, basically anything that someone said about the World Economic Forum, or Bill Gates.

    They’re now refusing to comply with that subpoena. But the stakes keep getting escalated, because who’s going to enforce that subpoena? Steve Bannon, regardless of your opinion of him, just got indicted for not complying with a subpoena, but is this Justice Department going to pursue criminal penalties against Stanford, for withholding congressional subpoena for their government?

    This is for their government, because they were the formal partners. They had a formal partnership with the DHS. That stuff should be FOIA-able, first of all. You shouldn’t even need a subpoena for it. The only reason you can’t FOIA it is because they laundered it through Stanford. Standord holds the records rather than DHS.

    I tried to FOIA that from DHS, and DHS says, ‘We don’t have it, even though they were our communications.’ So this is the way the CIA structures in an operation, through a web of cutouts and offshore banks, so you can never really get transparency. They’re now doing that for the censorship industry at home …

    Whether they will continue to raise the stakes is now a terrifying open issue. And the fact that it’s the inside guys who are running the censorship situation means there may be other tactics that need to be pursued here, which is why I talked about, simply, going to the appropriations committee and zeroing it out, so you don’t even need to enforce subpoenas, necessarily.”

Building a Whole-of-Society Solution

As explained by Benz, the censorship industry was built as a so-called whole-of-society effort. According to the DHS, misinformation online is a whole-of-society problem that requires a whole-of-society solution. By that, they meant that four types of institutions had to fuse together as a seamless whole. Those four categories and key functions are:

    Government institutions, which provide funding and coordination
    Private sector institutions that do the censorship and dedicate funds to censorship through corporate-social responsibility programs
    Civil society institutions (universities, NGOs, academia, foundations, nonprofits and activists) that do the research, the spying and collecting of data that are then given to the private sector to censor
    News media/fact checking institutions, which put pressure on institutions, platforms and businesses to comply with the censorship demands

What the Foundation for Freedom Online is doing is educating people about this structure, and the ways in which legislatures and the government can be restructured, how civil society institutions can be established, and how news media can be created to support and promote freedom rather than censorship.

https://www.truth11.com/how-the-censorsh...n-stop-it/