Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Controlled Opposition Clarification
#41
I agree Hissil, that being consciously aware is much better than having no awareness of what ‘may’ happen, it is always a choice to take any type of drug, even when that choice can be influenced by your mates, the ego or emotional turmoil.

I see your point that DMT is naturally produced, yet it can not be naturally re-created, it is not the same.

Raising your awareness through hallucinates or psychedelics is a way for holes to be produced in the Auric field, because once you enter another realm of energy that you are not spiritually ready for, the energy enters your body, this journey may provide insight to other realms and knowledge, yet there is often a price to pay, because attachments have locked into your field when you are not ‘consciously’ in control of that journey. ‘Most’ people who contact other beings while under the influence are actually contacting entities that are in disguise.
Reply

#42
Let us not be limited by filters of paranoia or sabotage. Let us be open to everything with only the exercise of a healthy skepticism.

We should not accuse David or Stewart or Janet and so on without a strong background, nor should we close ourselves to these possibilities. We should only be open to all possibilities.

Let us simply ask and be guided by our selves and Oversouls. We need to balance, center, and use objectivity to come to the most accurate conclusions. When using the left brain we should use our objectivity in logic, not our ego.

David Icke is intelligently wise, has offered many profound logics and his time consuming research. It is hard to lie where absolute logic or knowing is concerned, if its absoluteness is concerned. At the same time we see although he tries to control himself he is passionate about what he does and shows a genuine concern. I believe he has come this far because he is following the path he is supposed to, not because he is not and he is one of them. In his own unique way, ironically he was one of the disinformation distributors (news reporter) then became the opposite. However being first known as a news reporter means if anyone sees a news reporter who suddenly goes mad telling a bunch of non truths - then is killed for saying allegedly, a bunch of "non truths" even an idiot should become suspicious. Therefore he has been publicly scrutinized/humiliated - and he has endured this for the sake of STANDING UP, for the sake of TRUTH. Since we should be open to all possibilities... and consider he could not be one of them whilst still unknowingly and indirectly working his efforts only to serve their purpose through the course of programming I am not going to stand by saying we should 100% accept David ignoring these other possibilities. But much reasonability tells us how much we can accept him. If he is channeling that certainly makes him more suspect, but only on grounds we accept what Stewart and Janet tells us about channeling... Do we not after all accept the programming which Stewart and Janet warn and teach us about? But Stewart and Janet are each a different story... (and fascinating ones...)

Stewart and Janet has offered us what no other allegedly disinformation distributor has distributed. (Especially together, WOW.) They have taught/told and given us all of the teachings/techniques/truths we need to discern OURSELVES, whether ANYONE is trustworthy or not - and how much, and how so, and so forth. They have gotten thus far because they use the ultimate, the paramount, the MIND PATTERN, COLOR, TONE, and ARCHETYPES to remain safe and out of reach of the government. As for programming, they have told us that they themselves question each other! They do this to remain ahead. We can test these so-taught techniques ourselves all we want. Let us take the truth we can get and discern the TRUTH from the LIES. Yes, I could be working for the government too, or I could be working without them knowing it, but I want YOU to try for YOURSELF like I have tried for MY self Stewart and Janet's valuable and versatile tool, "affirmations" and found they worked. They change the mind patterns. The mind is the energy and focus and creativity - it creates our realities. Have you seen Janet's "truth-seeker" affirmations? Have you tried them? Do you practice knowing and discerning? Let us evaluate all this information by going through one person at a time, and also putting all their teachings together to see where they contradict, where they make sense, where we can use one's techniques to discern another's, where the truth is, where the non truth is, all to get a better and fuller picture of the truth - and non truth.

Are you up for it? We can start a new thread right now.

Let us STOP making EXCUSES. The time to CHANGE is NOW.
Reply

#43
I'm up for it. Start the thread.
Reply

#44
you know the one thing I find common is that those who have been dis-info agents in the past are,somewhat,trying to change that.As well there are others who put out dis-info. since we're dealing with things not seen by humans for a long long time,discernment is necessary. Yet there are some things that have been passed that remain a basis for belief to discern. for example,if I were to actually meet a Reptillian,how would I truly know they are telling the truth? If it was things not known to humanity,what baseline could I possibly have,other than the nature of their species is deception? As well with the Grays,as they have a separate agenda that is still nefarious. If they told me the Rep's were evil, and they were good,what could I base that on? Other than what's been said many times over.They are working together against humanity. They HATE the religion we have been given,and do not worship or even thank the same god we do. How would the average person process and interpret this all?
Personally my belief's/faith is all I have,and it's gotten me through some serious shyte.
My point is,that without a baseline,you have no basis to believe what's told. They are actively seeking to change that in their favor. I see it everyday. I also see some who've run in those circles trying [at least appearing to] get the word out about them. Things would be soooo much better without them,but they won't leave. Not without a fight at least,which probably won't be much of one. Their concealment is their greatest strength thus far. And those offering knowledge of them for money,only benefits those who can afford it. I think it should be free if our survival depends on it.
Reply

#45
"I'm up for it. Start the thread."

Awww, why?!

LOL, just kidding, no excuses, (just a little complaining.)

I just got through plenty thinking/typing as you might see from the main General Discussion thread board.

I will start the topic, (since you guys are too lazy apparently!) and it will be called Discerning Deception. (But how are you gonna get motivated if you're all lazy? Lol just come to the board whenever, we'll work it out.)

Anu-021413, I appreciate your comments, the questions I might as well address in "the new thread." (The new thread that shoulda' been made a longtima'go.)

(Okay now how do I get my lazy butt outta' here?)
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.