Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Expansions.com exposed
#91
<p>
(01-25-2012, 05:50 AM)Jacaranda Wrote: </p>
<p>This comment refers to Stewart's podcast where he "addresses" the current events around the Costa Concordia, which the captain sunk out of sheer stupidity and arrogance. I am addressing Stewart's pathetic podcast here, in the hope that people will wake up!</p>
<p>There are not many people whom I consider persona non grata, but these I would not miss Stewart and Janet at all if they were gone. They are both on first rank in this very short list of mine. I suppose Francesco Schettino, the captain of the Costa Concordia, would be held by many people these days in similar regards. His actions killed 16 people so far - deaths which could and should have been avoided, with 20 more missing. Most likely, the death toll will be 36 people, and not 33.</p>
<p>Interesting to learn then that Stewart and Janet were also on that ship and had met (and liked) the captain! Of course they consider the captain a good man, who was most likely programmed and triggered to go off-course on that day. We feel sorry for him too. What else would or could they say, after all? I am starting to think that they must have a very limited vocabulary indeed and I can see how they would complain at a local supermarket about whatever problem and later claim the cashier was mind-programmed (and indeed they do), but that is going off-topic here...</p>
<p>Not surprising though that someone equally pathetic and incompetent as the captain would claim (and do so with the benifit of hindsight) that the captain was in fact competent. The facts of course point towards a different direction. The captain literally fled his own ship, claiming to have fallen "by accident" into an auxiliary life saving boat. That's the sort of action Stewart would do and the sort of excuse that Janet would give.</p>
<p>Question therefore is this: did the Swerdlows program the captain which led same to be triggered lateinto sinking his own ship as a symbolic ritual sacrifice for the Illuminati? One thing I do know, if there are not precisely 33 deaths, as Stewart claims there will be, that would really take the piss! And be show of immense disregard for the victim's that lost their lives and the families that are grieving.</p>
<p>As said before, Stewart, if you have nothing to say it really is best to say nothing... Notice how he is decreasing the amount of his moron articles to copy and paste youtube videos instead, which most likely some teenager created out sheer boredom.</p>
<p>I feel very sad for both of you, Stewart and Janet.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Well, it's gets even better!! My own research through the press articles has revealed that Francesco Schettino was <strong>not</strong> the captain on the Costa Concordia while Stewart and Janet were on board. The captain at the time was Cpt. Giorgio Moretti. He was also the one who baptised the vessel in 2006. Except that Stewart claims to have met with the Cpt. Francesco Schettino in his video podcast and that this was the same captain who led the vessel during their tour. Oups!</p>
<p>This shows just how they think and how people need to be careful of the information they give out, as they usually put a twist on it to suit their own needs. Ladies and gentlemen, here is your <em><strong>proof</strong></em> that Stewart's posts on analysing the news are completely made up, poorly researched, if at all, and are absolutely meaningless. They just make it up as they go along... Imagine now that they do this during seminars, on their DVDs, in their books! If you consider that bullshitting is all they do day in day out, suddenly paying US$ 10'000 for an OMG class seems less attractive, doesn't it?</p>
<p>It would appear, Stewart, that you just got caught with your trousers down!</p>
Reply

#92
<p>
(01-25-2012, 10:27 AM)Jacaranda Wrote: </p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;">Ladies and gentlemen, here is your <em><strong>proof</strong></em> that Stewart's posts on analysing the news are completely made up, poorly researched, if at all, and are absolutely meaningless. They just make it up as they go along... Imagine now that they do this during seminars, on their DVDs, in their books! <strong>If you consider that bullshitting is all they do day in day out, suddenly paying US$ 10'000 for an OMG class seems less attractive, doesn't it?</strong> This shows just how they think and how people need to be careful of the information they give out, as they usually put a twist on it to suit their own needs.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:small;">It would appear, Stewart, that you just got caught with your trousers down! <img class="smilie" src="images/smilies/emoticons/icon_steckenpferd.gif" alt="Icon_steckenpferd" border="0" /></span></p>
<p>
</p>
<p><em><strong>WELL DONE JACARANDA!</strong></em></p>
Reply

#93
From a coup,e of days ago the wisdom of Mrs. s

"Depression is for illuminati mind controlled slaves" ....



Well, I guess it is just as well that Expansions has all the answers for that sweeping generalization...

Cast the net far and wide....





Reply

#94
I read Stew's newest snow report and had to laugh. He sure is an idiot when it comes to snow. He acted like it was so unusual to get wet heavy snow. That's very common around here. If it's above 30 degrees you get wet heavy snow. If it's below 30 degrees you get light fluffy snow. No mystery to it. Just simple science.
Reply

#95
<p>
(01-29-2012, 02:31 AM)Richard Wrote: I read Stew's newest snow report and had to laugh. He sure is an idiot when it comes to snow. He acted like it was so unusual to get wet heavy snow. That's very common around here. If it's above 30 degrees you get wet heavy snow. If it's below 30 degrees you get light fluffy snow. No mystery to it. Just simple science.
</p>
<p>They wanted heavy solid snow to make an igloo with White Wolf, so they were able to program their female OMG members in it and getting them on Snow Wolf frequency.</p>
Reply

#96
<p>Here is a post from another forum..I thought it was good enough to share here....</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This, I think is in reference to a conference in Daytona late 90's.</p>
<p>From the editor at Nexuss.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I was a speaker at the Global Science Congress, in Florida in the mid-late 90s, which is not long after Swerdlow came out of jail and reinvented himself. In a closed meeting of speakers only, where all the 20 or so speakers stood up and told us who they were, and what they were going to talk about, Swerdlow told us his story. He told the stunned group of speakers, that he had been in jail, and that the CIA had identified him as one of the most powerful psychics on the planet. He claimed they came to him in jail and let him out on the condition that he helped them in their 'experiments'. Swerdlow told us that he was taken to a secret facility at Montauk and that he was used to sodomize to death, hundreds and hundreds of kidnapped young boys (mostly streetkids and orphans). He told us that the 'energy' from this activity was harnessed via some sort of 'chair' and used to open portals, through which demons and aliens could be contacted.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>He doesn't like people knowing this part of his 'history' nowadays, but that is what he told us back then. At this same conference, Al Bielek told me that Swerdlow approached him, asking him to 'modify' his Philadelphia Experiment story to include being at Montauk and seeing Swerdlow. Bielek was outraged that Swerdlow was such a liar. At least Al Bielek believed his own story, whereas it was obvious that Swerdlow just made up what people wanted to hear. Soon afterwards, Peter Moon got hold of Swerdlow, and his tales became even more outrageous - which was great for selling books. And then came the period when Swerdlow became a 'famous psychic' - one who left a trail of financially burnt rich new age women who took sympathy on poor Stewart being used so harshly - and who Swerdlow took money from until they had none left. For those who think I am making this up, this is Swerdlow's prison details: ------------- Federal Inmate Locator - from 1982 to present Name: STEWART SWERDLOW Register #: 29938-053 Age-Race-Sex: 54-White-M Release Date: 08-18-1994 Location: RELEASED Victoria ------------- The guy is a known and convicted con man and fraud. Everything he has claimed about Montauk was fabricated after he watched videos of Preston Nichols, Duncan Cameron and Al Bielek. He pretends to have psychic powers, and it costs you a lot of money to find out that he doesn't. It is all bullshit - so please don't give this fraud any extra free advertising! </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1750975/pg1</p>
<p> </p>
Reply

#97

Duncan Roads has Stew pretty much figured out but like Stew he fabricates lies like Stew. For example he said his team of investigators found out Swerdlow isn't his real last name. He pretty much thinks Montauk never happened. I told him I was in a men's group of survivors that got together every week. Duncan says no such group exist. Duncan has this attitude that he's the all seeing eye that sees everything that happens on this planet and there's nothing he doesn't know about.

Reply

#98
<p>
(02-06-2012, 09:05 PM)Richard Wrote: </p>
<p>Duncan Roads has Stew pretty much figured out but like Stew he fabricates lies like Stew. For example he said his team of investigators found out Swerdlow isn't his real last name. He pretty much thinks Montauk never happened. I told him I was in a men's group of survivors that got together every week. Duncan says no such group exist. Duncan has this attitude that he's the all seeing eye that sees everything that happens on this planet and there's nothing he doesn't know about.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Great link, PP!  Richard,  Don't you think Stewart was at Montalk as a programmer at least? Duncan Cameron doesn't think Montauk happened?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bielek.com/duncan.htm">http://www.bielek.com/duncan.htm</a></p>
Reply

#99
I only remember reading that one article he posted about Stewart.. ( it has been posted here somewhere already)...


Figured he was a bit of an ass...I liked his post though.


Reply

I should have made it clear I was talking about Duncan Roads. Editor of Nexus magazine.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.