Posts: 2,758
Threads: 130
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
7
01-11-2012, 08:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-11-2012, 08:43 PM by Octahedron.)
Posts: 2,265
Threads: 58
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
30
<p>Interesting Octa. When you think about it, symbols abound everywhere in life. Our moods/feelings are being "tweaked" and manipulated all the time by symbols, colors, sounds and images while we're out in the world. The Swerdlow's et al. have just taken this nonsense to a whole other level. They've found major POWER symbols and want that the public NOW have access to them! WHY?</p>
<p>It's certainly not for our "health."</p>
<p> </p>
Posts: 327
Threads: 14
Joined: Jun 2011
There are two things I would like to comment here, regarding the symbolism, both in real life, and with Expansions.
The first is that symbolism is omnipresent and in that what the Swerdlows talk about in terms of archetypes is correct, in that there is a way to read reality through symbols. This said, most archetypes which the Swerdlows discuss, are to a great extend self-fabricated. They are either taken from other sources and then modified, or they are produced in the same disturbed manner as Stewart analyses current affairs. This means that there is a problem in two ways: first the symbols may not be correct, i.e. look differently in reality, and second, the meaning is certainly not correct in all cases. This means that by using the archetype index from their writings you'd have a hard time to actually derive anything from what you see in real life. Observe also how confused and incoherent Stewart himself is when he discusses archetypes. I thought it was curious to see how one particular user on their forum explained the archetypes better then the Swerdlows themselves, while they were busy plastering advertising for their silly products underneath... Interesting also that his sons seem to see archetypes much more clearly than Stewart; and not surprising that one of them does the 'personalized healing archetype cards' for them, as neither Stewart or Janet can actually deliver here...
The second point is that from what I was shown, most archetypes from Expansions are indeed designed to harm you, not help you. Many are designed to program you. Effects can be noticed almost immediately in form of headaches, fatigue, dizziness, etc. Above all, they are designed to confuse more than anything else, in order to keep you wanting to consult further. This actually marketing, similar to any other cult or sect. I have also been told that some of them act as antenna, the merging archetype is one such antenna.
Symbols are a part of our life yes, but let's be real: nobody ever got rich by observing symbols! You still have to live your life on your own! The archetypes at most will only help you in observing and understanding the world you live in, but they cannot replace rational thinking.
Posts: 2,758
Threads: 130
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
7
01-13-2012, 08:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-13-2012, 08:44 AM by Octahedron.)
<p> (01-13-2012, 03:54 AM)Jacaranda Wrote: There are two things I would like to comment here, regarding the symbolism, both in real life, and with Expansions. The first is that symbolism is omnipresent and in that what the Swerdlows talk about in terms of archetypes is correct, in that there is a way to read reality through symbols. This said, most archetypes which the Swerdlows discuss, are to a great extend self-fabricated. They are either taken from other sources and then modified, or they are produced in the same disturbed manner as Stewart analyses current affairs.</p>
<p> Some are modified, yes; it's the challenge to find out which and how, so it reveals some agenda details.</p>
<p> Quote:This means that there is a problem in two ways: first the symbols may not be correct, i.e. look differently in reality, and second, the meaning is certainly not correct in all cases. This means that by using the archetype index from their writings you'd have a hard time to actually derive anything from what you see in real life. Observe also how confused and incoherent Stewart himself is when he discusses archetypes. I thought it was curious to see how one particular user on their forum explained the archetypes better then the Swerdlows themselves, while they were busy plastering advertising for their silly products underneath... Interesting also that his sons seem to see archetypes much more clearly than Stewart; and not surprising that one of them does the 'personalized healing archetype cards' for them, as neither Stewart or Janet can actually deliver here...</p>
<p>
The errors are also in the use of the symbols without understanding the spiritual meaning of them when the soul is open or recognizing the symbolics.</p>
<p>I tend to say S leads his customers with the hyperspace exercises to a more astral/physical application for the soul, instead of a more spiritual application. I think hyperspace symbolics (the correct ones) can be used for strenghtening the soul in the direction of the spiritual; The other way (to astral/physical) is like the story of the fall of the soul in the darkness by temptation and uncontrolled desires..</p>
<p> Quote:The second point is that from what I was shown, most archetypes from Expansions are indeed designed to harm you, not help you. Many are designed to program you. Effects can be noticed almost immediately in form of headaches, fatigue, dizziness, etc. Above all, they are designed to confuse more than anything else, in order to keep you wanting to consult further. This actually marketing, similar to any other cult or sect.
good points, I think there are many explanations; even some exercises can be good while also creating headaches etc; some are bad and can give a terrific feeling. i.e. Some are working for the short term/beginning, like "'S' lion frequency" and do disturb in the long term. So, the lion frequency of S is a trap in the long term; there really is a good lion frequency; it is difficult from the version of S, and it is to be used only for spiritual growth.</p>
<p> Quote:I have also been told that some of them act as antenna, the merging archetype is one such antenna. Symbols are a part of our life yes, but let's be real: nobody ever got rich by observing symbols! You still have to live your life on your own! The archetypes at most will only help you in observing and understanding the world you live in, but they cannot replace rational thinking.
</p>
<p>Jacaranda, good point.</p>
<p>If I am allowed to add: .. the soul has the ability to find out which symbolics are working or useful; it's an individual choice like everybody has his own DNA, taste of music or food. It's like the same principal of why amulets etc. do work. The symbolics or cards don't do anything, they are only a crutch for the soul, to remind and help the soul in the correct spiritual direction to work.</p>
<p>the brown merger is dangerous in the sense when using it in deprogramming a trauma it connects the trauma to the current phyical and astral conditions. The brown merger is to be used only with simple exercises related to a clean simple physical condition with no any negative or traumatic item related in them ; like grounding or balancing. Anyway, I don't want to promote it; it has a meaning in 2 ways: it can disturb you or it can ground you. After what I had seen what is discussed about it for years, I think it's better not to take the risk with using it by most of us, to my opinion.</p>
<p>I tend also to say the brown merger can act as an antennae; it causes mind/astral energies transforming in physical/earthly energies at the location of the exercise; so the auric field of the earth is affected immediately with this; and thus electronic devices or radionics are able to monitor the subtle change of the earthly local energies. It also depends on ley lines and energy points where the exercise is executed. I also think the brown merger is an archetype that is related to lower sexual energies, a powerful archetype that brings the lowest physical male and female energies into physical reality to each other; without judging it.</p>
Posts: 11,157
Threads: 4,145
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,276
Linked Accounts
Posts: 327
Threads: 14
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 327
Threads: 14
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 65
Threads: 4
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation:
0
I've been thinking lately about T bars. Where did Stewart come up with this idea? Is there any truth to it? If so, how and why do these 3 symbols relate to genetics? He never offered any real explanation for it, probably because he didn't know himself -and those of us, loyal Stewbots, just assumed it was true.
Posts: 11,157
Threads: 4,145
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,276
Linked Accounts
Posts: 11,157
Threads: 4,145
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,276
Linked Accounts
|