Simultaneous Existences

[Octahedron]

Good Sariel, I also don't want to waste  my time to repetitive things we have discussed already here, and that good example of Bobbydigital is also remembered by me, I'll have to evaluate that.

But let me first go to the history facts, I can counterspeak already 3 claims of you.

- there were many wars in Germany between Romans and pagans in 0-400 A.D. there are many monuments and ruines at near the river Rhine that can show you this. I am even sitting on one of them behind my laptop now ! You should have a visit to Nijmegen, Xanten, Cologne and Trier.

- Spanish pirates and Dutch pirates were often targeting esp. on English and French fleets in 1670-1720. Pirates also sometimes were mutineers against their own country. They had some of their bases near Cuba and the Antilles. Holland and Spain were often close together in that period, and Spain had a colony in the Southern Netherlands (Belgium now)

 - The Romans (Western Empire) did still exist around 486 A.D. ., they even had a base in Northern France that time (leaded by commander Syagrius) very close to the British Islands. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syagrius

But these details are not very relevant; relevant is the quality of the sim. exist. scans.

In all the things you already wrote about sim. existences, it seems that you are mostly concerned that the scans or reports of S seem to give you a low selfworth or these reports are to undermine you. I've read that different times here from you. Richard also wrote somewhat about this, but I see here that you are the most very angry person about this.

[Sariel]

Good Sariel, I also don't want to waste my time to repetitive things we have discussed already here, and that good example of Bobbydigital is also remembered by me, I'll have to evaluate that. But let me first go to the history facts, I can counterspeak already 3 claims of you. - there were many wars in Germany between Romans and pagans in 0-400 A.D. there are many monuments and ruines at near the river Rhine that can show you this. I am even sitting on one of them behind my laptop now ! You should have a visit to Nijmegen, Xanten, Cologne and Trier.

There was no war in 100AD on the territory of Germany.

- Spanish pirates and Dutch pirates were often targeting esp. on English and French fleets in 1670-1720. Pirates also sometimes were mutineers against their own country. They had some of their bases near Cuba and the Antilles. Holland and Spain were often close together in that period, and Spain had a colony in the Southern Netherlands (Belgium now)

Those were ships from Holland, they were called Dunkirkers.

- The Romans (Western Empire) did still exist around 486 A.D. ., they even had a base in Northern France that time (leaded by commander Syagrius) very close to the British Islands. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syagrius

There was no communication between Rome and Britain from around 400AD.

But these details are not very relevant; relevant is the quality of the sim. exist. scans.

Rubbish.

In all the things you already wrote about sim. existences, it seems that you are mostly concerned that the scans or reports of S seem to give you a low selfworth or these reports are to undermine you. I've read that different times here from you. Richard also wrote somewhat about this, but I see here that you are the most very angry person about this.

Hahaha, it's again. It's not problem on idiotic Stewart, but it's in us who question his diabolic nonsense.

He thought that he can deceive me, but he can't. And what then this speaks about you? Trying to defend Stewart's every whim and scam? You must to have some masochistic tendencies then.

At least, this can help people to open their eyes to some truth.

And regarding my self-worth, I do have a very high selfworth opinion about myself, indeed.

[Dejjan]

[user=14]Sariel[/user] wrote: 

And regarding my self-worth, I do have a very high selfworth opinion about myself, indeed. 

It is not hard to notice that

[Octahedron]

..There was no war in 100AD on the territory of Germany.

So, what were the Roman legions doing there in 100 A.D. ? Playing Basketbal ?

No, Sariel, 1-0 for me here.

- Spanish pirates and Dutch pirates were often targeting esp. on English and French fleets in 1670-1720. Pirates also sometimes were mutineers against their own country. They had some of their bases near Cuba and the Antilles. Holland and Spain were often close together in that period, and Spain had a colony in the Southern Netherlands (Belgium now)

 Those were ships from Holland, they were called Dunkirkers.

The name Dunkirkers is from Duinkerken, see: i.e. it became French territory in around 1660-1665.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunkirk 

and there is a difference between pirates and privateers or commerce raiders.

But between 1600-1800 there were everywhere pirates in the Caraibic, from most sea countries in Europe. So, Spanish pirates were as normal as Spanish priests.

makes 2-0 for me.

- The Romans (Western Empire) did still exist around 486 A.D. ., they even had a base in Northern France that time (leaded by commander Syagrius) very close to the British Islands. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syagrius

There was no communication between Rome and Britain from around 400AD.

With such a little distance between England and France ?  there was a smoothy conversion process during 400-700 A.D.  You have to reread history. see i.e.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Brita...Roman_rule

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-Roman_Britain

that makes 3-0 for me, Sariel.

....

Hahaha, it's again. It's not problem on idiotic Stewart, but it's in us who question his diabolic nonsense.

He thought that he can deceive me, but he can't. And what then this speaks about you? Trying to defend Stewart's every whim and scam? You must to have some masochistic tendencies then. 

 

It speaks nothing about me. I am not defending Stewart with these history points; I am only checking your 3 claims on history, and I am convinced they are not correct and you have to admit your history viewpoints are not accurate in these 3 claims because of my given information that anybody here is able to check freely.

At least, this can help people to open their eyes to some truth.

I have never problems with people doing that.

And regarding my self-worth, I do have a very high selfworth opinion about myself, indeed. 

That is not so relevant here. You wrote many times you think S was busy to make his clients feeling less valuable or S is busy to undermine the selfconfidence among his clients by his reports and scans about sim. existences.

and that is a thing I am going after seriously. Forum Member "myself" (not you) wrote also something about the accuracy rate or the nonsense rate about the s.e. scans of S. Maybe he comes back in this forum part.

[Sariel]

F*ck this sh*t. I wrote a message and get a blank space.

Now I have to write it again.

[Sariel]

So, what were the Roman legions doing there in 100 A.D. ? Playing Basketbal ?

What are doing American military forces stationed on the border of Canada and the US?

and there is a difference between pirates and privateers or commerce raiders.

That's what I am saying. Those were privateers, not pirates.

But between 1600-1800 there were everywhere pirates in the Caraibic, from most sea countries in Europe. So, Spanish pirates were as normal as Spanish priests.

No, pirates are legends. Most were a bunch of underfeed dogs who plundered ships with cattle and wheats. Only privateers had gun power and ships to make  some damage  and greater profits.

With such a little distance between England and France ? there was a smoothy conversion process during 400-700 A.D. You have to reread history. see i.e.

I studied British Roman history very extensively. There was no communication between Rome and Britain after 400.AD. Those who didn't left after 400AD  had to stood there and mixed with local population.

It speaks nothing about me. I am not defending Stewart with these history points; I am only checking your 3 claims on history, and I am convinced they are not correct and you have to admit your history viewpoints are not accurate in these 3 claims because of my given information that anybody here is able to check freely.

You are defending him even when he's wrong.

That is not so relevant here. You wrote many times you think S was busy to make his clients feeling less valuable or S is busy to undermine the selfconfidence among his clients by his reports and scans about sim. existences.

Yes, those reports are designed in that way.

and that is a thing I am going after seriously. Forum Member "myself" (not you) wrote also something about the accuracy rate or the nonsense rate about the s.e. scans of S. Maybe he comes back in this forum part.

No, he won't.

[Richard]

and that is a thing I am going after seriously. Forum Member "myself" (not you) wrote also something about the accuracy rate or the nonsense rate about the s.e. scans of S. Maybe he comes back in this forum part.

No, he won't.

This is true, forum member "myself" was banned for making threats in PMs to other members.

[Octahedron]

That is not so relevant here. You wrote many times you think S was busy to make his clients feeling less valuable or S is busy to undermine the selfconfidence among his clients by his reports and scans about sim. existences.

Yes, those reports are designed in that way.

 

There we are at the core of the discussion, finally.

The sim. ex. reports he wrote about me are mixed between "bad" and "good" "value" (I don't say now, they are true reports, I'm just giving the report results)

i.e. 

- one s.e. in Atlantis is a thing that was very exciting and gave me a lot of insights in the last years at this forum.

- a very unlucky s.e. in Holland

- a very simple s.e. in Germany

- one s.e. in Spain that was also interesting for historical and cultural aspects I am now busy with.

[Octahedron]

As far as his simultaneous existences is concerned.... I think he is right on. Very accurate. I will not give examples but I was able to verify this.

Well Sariel .....

 

[infrared]

I checked twice if the Magdalene incarnation was mine,the answer was affirmative.I will check a 3rd time,in the highest possible way.

MC, what if this insight is resultant of a cross-reception with an unfair entity/satellite beam?