07-12-2006, 11:23 AM
I did a little reading on the 13th sign and came accross this.
Quote:On the 21st January 1995, astronomers announced the 'discovery' of a new constellation named Ophiuchus or Serpentarius, the serpent bearer. The Royal Astronomical Society promptly issued statements claiming that this was the final proof that astrology was rubbish, since astrologers were, they said, not taking account of this 'new sign'. Unfortunately, as is so often the case, the astronomical greats and goods have failed to understand the very basis of astrology.
Astrologers have known about Ophiuchus for centuries, just as we know about other constellations like Pegasus and Hercules. A constellation is not the same as a 'sign'. The two are quite separate things. Astrologers use the zodiac signs as a kind of shorthand to describe the degrees of the ecliptic, that's all. This is why the other favourite astronomical 'debunk' theory, the precession of the equinoxes, also has no effect on astrology.
The sun travels through the *constellation* of Ophiuchus between approximately November 30th and December 17th each year, thus it falls between the *astronomical constellations* of Scorpio and Sagittarius. It has no effect on modern astrology whatsoever, and most certainly is not a 13th sign of the zodiac.
http://www.elysian.co.uk/askastrologerarchives3.htm