Posts: 440
Threads: 80
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation:
0
I havent considered myself a big time contributor to this thread or topic.
I honestly don't want to deal with any of this crap, i also find it quiet 'negative', and i don't want it in my life.
But after i read Stew's phoney, moronic website 'therealhyperspacecafe' you pissed me off, i take that website as a personal threat, and you pissed off the wrong mofo.
SJ pretty much declared war on every single person that has ever posted on this forum, with discusting threats. And you even lied and said you were based out of 'europe' lol WTF was that?
Big mistake.
If you think you have more connections to powerfull people, more so then all of the people combined on this forum, then you are delusional. That is why you are bottom feeding the patriot radio networks with YOUNG naive radio show hosts who have no real idea who you are 'jacky'.
BTW not for long, as these young, naive radio hosts are smart cookies and won't buy into your lies for long. Especailly after people like us tell them wtf is up.
ps, you thought you had a hard time getting into Canada, before?
:)
Swerdlows, repent for every evil and dishonest deed you have ever done and we will forgive you in time, if you refuse, buckle up, you are in for a fu*king ride.
Posts: 440
Threads: 80
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation:
0
how bout a live audio debate between the swerdlows and yukesam, richard, and myself as a referee ? lol
seriously lets talk this sh*t out like adults.
Posts: 113
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
Posts: 440
Threads: 80
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation:
0
the Swerdlows have literally a created a fu*king ARMY of people they have ripped off and PISSED OFF in the past.
overtime the high number of people have accumlated to form a fu*king army of pissed off people.
there's pissed off people like me, who only paid for the books and never sent a dime to the cult for 'consultations' or any of that bs and there are more hardcore ex cultists who got literally fucked by the swerdlows, financially and physically.
also i spent countless hours promoting the Swerdlows written works on the internet, in person, and on the radio.
as punishment, in repayment, i demand the Swerdlows repay me, by promoting my writings and works of art, hours a day, months, and even years, promoting my works of art with a chain to their legs, as they promote my art to the free people of planet earth.
Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
Posts: 127
Threads: 1
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
A couple of things:
Firstly, yes, this thread has a lot of ranting which is basically a turnoff to people who don't feel the same way or who are just looking for facts or personal experiences. As I've been reading through this website, I found a great deal of information offered by people over the years which has been pushed under the more recent postings, which is factual rather than emotional (can't recall where it's all located, though).
How big a project would it be to create a "digest" thread where the "meat" of all the various threads could be placed, devoid of the emotional, non-specific ranting or personal attacks? I feel like that thread would be the MOST helpful to those wondering what's going on and who have no clue as to the dishonest nature of those two people.
If it was decided to create such a thread, it would need to be actively monitored to make sure none of the negative comments that turn people off got posted there. Just objective, factual, personal experience postings.
This is the kind of thread I would have liked to have seen originally because some of us don't have the time to weed through the bigger threads and we get turned off by the negativity. We want facts, we don't want to be brought down by negativity, and we want to choose for ourselves rather than have people pushing us to buy into taking sides. People are intelligent enough to make their own informed decisions when presented with facts and personal stories.
Thoughts, anyone?
Posts: 11,323
Threads: 4,259
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
60
All Accounts Posts: 16,442
Linked Accounts
Posts: 127
Threads: 1
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
Okay, well I didn't know that Yukesam had created a thread like that and that no one cared to post on.
When I used the word emotional, I guess I should have been more specific. What I meant was that in telling one's personal story, those emotions are natural and necessary to share. But just the angry ranting with no specificity makes this site look like a hater site that does nothing other than spread negativity. And any new person looking to research true stories that people have experienced with Expansions could get defensive of Expansions or just turned off.
I don't think, as a rule, people would come to this site who are still in the throes of learning from Expansions. There seems to be a natural defense up during the intense time of learning. Only later, when one has a chance to digest and synthesize some of the teachings with the heart, might one be open to coming to a site like this.
BTW, Mercy Now, the stuff you have posted over the years has been very informative and helpful. I think what may have happened to the people that have been posting here a long time is that perhaps it gets tiresome rehashing the same old, same old. That's why I suggested a digest of the really good information that's been posted on this topic over the years. Newer posters get to understand the longer term posters' experiences in more depth.
Posts: 58
Threads: 1
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
The people that at least take the effort to read a little will still change over time. Like a seed is planted in the earth it takes time for it to sprout. That is why SJ are so scared of this site even existing. Sure people can turn their heads and write it off as hate and angry rants, but on some level something starts to change.
As long as we keep this site alive we are making a change, so that is the whole clue here, to continue spreading the information. A person might get turned off the first time he/she reads it, but when the person comes back for the third or fourth time they will pay much more attention to what is being said and look more at what is being said, not how it is being sad.
|
