Amazon to begin testing Digit – a six-foot-tall humanoid robot that might end up REPLACING human warehouse workers

10/22/2023 // Arsenio Toledo

Tags: Amazon, Amazon warehouses, automation, Big Tech, Digit, job losses, jobs, mass layoffs, robotics, robots, tech giants, technocrats

Amazon is testing the use of humanoid, six-foot-tall robots at their warehouses, causing more fears of employee displacement. The experiment will be conducted at Amazon's BFI1 experimental facility in Sumner, Washington.

The robot, known as Digit, is a two-legged robot that is capable of grasping and lifting items at Amazon facilities. Digit has two arms, two legs, a blue chest and two square lights for eyes. It can move forward and backward, turn around and bend down. It can reach, grab and lift the iconic yellow tote boxes of Amazon.

The company claims Digit will help human warehouse workers with tote recycling by picking up and moving empty totes once all items in them have been removed.

To create Digit, Amazon's robotics subsidiary, Amazon Robotics, partnered with the tech startup Agility Robotics. This startup, based in Oregon, focuses on creating robots for logistics and warehouse businesses. Amazon, through the Amazon Industrial Innovation Fund, provided Agility Robotics with $150 million in funding to help create Digit.

At the end of the trial period for Digit, Amazon plans to put the robot to work "in spaces and corners of warehouses in novel ways."

"We believe that there is a big opportunity to scale a mobile manipulator solution, such as Digit, which can work collaboratively with employees," Amazon added.

Amazon claims human warehouse workers are "irreplaceable"

Amazon noted that Digit is still in the very early stages of development, and so it will be some time before the company will be able to deploy them on a large scale on warehouse floors.

"They won't strike, ask for more pay or annoy higher-ups with requests for 'rights,'" commented Steve Watson for InfoWars. (Related: Workers in warehouses could soon lose their jobs to HUMANOID ROBOTS.)

Amazon Robotics Chief Technologist Tye Brady claimed that Amazon's human workers are "irreplaceable," and what Digit will be doing is eliminating "all the menial, the mundane and the repetitive" tasks inside Amazon's warehouses. He denied that Digit's deployment would lead to job cuts, claiming that the increasing automation in warehouses "does not" mean Amazon will require fewer staff.

"There's not any part of me that thinks that would ever be a reality," said Brady, referring to the possibility of a fully automated Amazon warehouse. "People are so central to the fulfillment process; the ability to think at a higher level, the ability to diagnose problems."

"We will always need people," he continued. "I've never been around an automated system that works 100 percent of the time. I don't think you have as well." Brady added that the end goal for Digit is to have it "collaboratively" work with Amazon employees.

"Collaborative robotics involves people. How can we have people be the stars, the spotlight, the center of the show when it comes to the jobs that we have to do?" said Brady. "When we do our job really, really well, our robotic systems just kind of blend into the background to become ubiquitous. You don't talk about your dishwasher too much in your kitchen. It's an amazing robot. It's such a great robot that I don't even call it a robot."

Watch this video of financial analyst John Williams discussing how Amazon is about to conduct a "climate stress test" on its suppliers – and those who don't follow along may pay a big price.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-10-22-a...rkers.html

Facing the Beast: Courage, Faith and Resistance in a New Dark Age
By Dr Naomi Wolf
October 24, 2023

Please pre-order here: https://www.amazon.com/Facing-Beast-Cour...1645022366

Introduction:
This story begins in the “Before” world.

“Before” the years 2020 to 2023, when a set of policies based on abject lies posed an existential threat to our democracy and our way of life. “Before” this likely AI-deployed set of lies, dispensed globally, targeted our West with its core traditions of free speech—and in the US, with its First Amendment—with arrant censorship.

“Before” the Left—the subculture that used to stand for human rights, freedom of speech, real science, critical thinking, and skepticism about Big Government and Big Corporations, let alone about their merger, and that used to fight against discrimination and inequality—fell into a trance in which that same group became champions of censorship, and of a two-tier society in which some people, as the pigs declared in Animal Farm, are “more equal” than others; and fell prey to magical thinking and cultlike behavior.

“Before” the media—which used to see itself as the source of investigation of elite powers; which used to ask questions about received narratives; which used to demand that its journalists produce evidence and independent verification before drawing conclusions in print—were bought out by Big Government via the CARES Act, and by Big Pharma directly, and by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to the extent that almost all legacy media became unquestioning stenographers for interested parties aligned with the global powers who dictated the harmful nonsense.

I miss the “Before Times.”

Because I have studied the histories of the overthrowing of past democracies, and learned that many democracies have died incrementally; that tyrants’ attacks on liberty are often executed surreptitiously, or attributed to benign motives, and thus succeed in draining people’s freedoms; or by enforcing bit by bit tiny compliances that add up to huge compliances, any of which would never have been considered by the same population without revolt, if the curtain was brought down all at once—I thought it was important to keep a kind of journal of these changes as I witnessed them. This book is a memoir of how our “Before” world—that lasted up until March 2020—became, through a slow boil and through various shocks to its core institutions—this “After” world of tyranny, sadism, and forced inequality.

I have been an activist defending the Constitution for the past three-plus decades. As a result of my work identifying and fighting earlier threats to democracy and free speech, I was able to see, early in 2020, the inevitable implications for our democracy and for our country as a whole, in the rollout of pandemic and lockdown and then mandate narratives and policies.

Given my previous work, it was easy to guess what all these policies would quickly do to us. It was easy for me to foretell that the immediate deployment of mass censorship of critics of these policies; the ramped-up State surveillance; the forced closures of schools, places of worship, and businesses; the unconstitutional declarations that we must not assemble, beyond a certain small number of people, even in private homes; the violation of the Nuremberg Laws and the most basic international human rights laws that guarantee bodily integrity and informed medical consent, represented mRNA vaccine mandates—would utterly transform our nation, and the nations of the West, into post-democratic societies; into societies that may look pretty much the same on the surface (as I argued in my 2008 bestseller The End of America that post-democratic societies would)—but that the heart of their freedom would be annihilated, leaving intact pretty-looking vassal states, with no real autonomy left for their citizens, where the nations of the free West so recently prevailed.

I saw early what a dangerous time it was and is: 2020 to 2023.

In my 2008 book about dying democracies, I had described the threats to liberty that prevailed at that time, in the George Bush Jr. era, as deriving primarily from the Right. But even then I was not deceived by partisanship assumptions about fascism, as I learned from my study of earlier totalitarian and fascist regimes and leaders that authoritarians of the Left and the Right are exactly the same; they take the same ten steps to ensure the death of democracies, and do the same things to propagandize their subject people, to silence dissent, to arrest opposition leaders, to create surveillance societies and prisons outside the rule of law, and eventually to bring about emergency law, which is Step Ten.

Since 2020, in America at least, these threats to our country have been deployed largely from the Left. Though I come “from the Left,” I had no problem recognizing this.

The threats to liberty worldwide had no partisan quality as they were “metapartisan,” being handed down from the WEF (World Economic Forum), the WHO (World Health Organization), the CCP (Chinese Communist Party), nongovernment foundations such as Bill Gates’s, and allied Big Tech leaders, as I described in my 2022 book The Bodies of Others. You could see the exact same pandemic, lockdown, and mandate policies rolled out in conservative-led Australia, in conservative-led UK, in liberal-led Canada, in liberal-led France, and so on.

Other people also spoke up, as the dark shadow of fascism descended on our nation under the cloak of a “public health emergency.”

Some others who had been identified with the US Left were also speaking out against the public health response to the pandemic. They also spoke out about the censorship regime that so visibly descended on us. Glenn Greenwald, Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying, Joe Rogan, Robert Kennedy Jr., and others, though identified with the Left, held the principles of the Constitution and basic human rights above partisanship. Other heroes, too, arose in this dark time, in ways that also transcended partisanship. Many of these were heroes of real medicine, real science, real public health. Some were doctors: Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Paul Alexander, Dr. Henry Ealy, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, and many others. Some were scientists and economists; the signatories and the convener of the Great Barrington Declaration, for instance: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, and economist Jeffrey Tucker. These all refused to tolerate, or even accept as settled “science,” policies that they knew would destroy schooling, damage the development of children, and lead to mass starvation.

Some heroes for truth came from the world of finance—critics such as Ed Dowd, formerly of BlackRock, who raised an early alarm about data showing excess deaths and disabilities post-mRNA vaccination. Or Steve Kirsch, an entrepreneur who also crunched the numbers on these harms, independently confirming the “democide”—death by government—that Mr. Dowd had found. These critics, whose training was in the world of hard data, perhaps spoke out because they simply could not tolerate the fibs and bad math that undergirded “the narrative”; as well as out of concern for their fellow human beings’ health, and even survival.

There were—are—many heroes and heroines. But not nearly enough.

There were—are—many millions more quislings and colluders, as I learned upon this painful journey.

****

My own life changed utterly, because of my taking actions that would have suited the “Before” world, but that I took in an “After” reality.

Until the COVID era, I had lived a fortunate life. I had been a well-known feminist nonfiction writer for thirty-five years; I’d published eight bestselling books. I had lived in Washington, D.C., and served as a campaign consultant to President Bill Clinton’s re-election campaign; I had advised Vice President Al Gore. I’d later moved to a charming apartment in Manhattan’s West Village, where I’d eventually, as a single mom, raised a beautiful family. I appeared on every news outlet, wrote for every major media platform, and was a columnist for outlets ranging from the Guardian, to the Soros-funded Project Syndicate, to the Sunday Times of London.

In addition to these professional validations, I was privileged to be part of the cultural “scene” made up of influencers on the progressive Left. It was a satisfying lifestyle: film premieres and art openings, book parties and galas. All these events reassured those of us attending that we were at the center of the universe, and for good reason; and that our worldview was the right one—indeed, the only one.

I had been treated as a media fixture for those thirty-five years, for doing what I had always done—speaking up for civil liberties and the Constitution and reporting on women’s health issues—especially on sexual and reproductive health issues, my beat.

During the pandemic and the lockdown, then, I did what I have always done; I investigated the myths and narratives that I saw forming online and in news outlets and asked public questions about them. For me, this was nothing new. By doing so, I realized that many of the diktats of the period were untrue. I saw quickly that the COVID-19 maps on the front pages of the New York Times, and the Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 map cited by almost every other news outlet in the US, were all produced without giving the reader any access to the underlying datasets, for example. As a tech CEO whose website specializes in presenting the same kind of government data (application programming interfaces—APIs), I saw immediately that there was no way to trust these COVID-19 maps.

I knew from having written The End of America that the fact that we were, in July of 2020, already at Step Ten of the Ten Steps to Fascism—emergency law—represented a very dangerous situation. I knew from having read my way, as a former graduate student, through many of the last 400 years’ worth of English memoirs and novels, that waves of infectious diseases, ranging from yellow fever to typhus to cholera, had passed over both Britain and America, but that these diseases had never been treated as we were treating this purportedly serious infectious disease, COVID-19. Never had multiple generations been advised to crowd together into closed indoor spaces, only to be denied light, air, and exercise, during an epidemic. Indeed, from Florence Nightingale in the Crimean War, to the reformers of the Progressive Era, health pioneers knew well that doing this was, in fact, deadly.

So many “truths” of the COVID narrative made no sense to me.

As I have always done with official narratives, I questioned these “truths.” But the world had changed. My questioning, instead of continuing to solidify my cultural status, called forth waves of bots and trolls, threats and harassment. My right-on, progressive friends let me know that they did not approve of the issues that I was raising.

Then came late 2020 and early 2021: the launch of the presentation of the mRNA injections as “the only way out” of the lockdowns. I recall reading Moderna’s website, which boasted that the company’s mRNA technology, and the spike protein in the vaccine formulation, would enter every cell in the human body.

I am an English major—not a medical doctor or a scientist. But I remember thinking: Every cell? In your ovaries? Your heart? Your liver? Your digestive tract? Your eyelashes? I have a neurological condition—spina bifida occulta; and I knew from experience how delicate was the nearly miraculous activity of healthy nerve conduction and how easily it could go awry. The nerves? I wondered. The myelin sheaths of the nerves? And I wondered how that—spike protein and mRNA entering the cells of the myelin sheaths of the nerves—would affect the fragile electrical conduction that allows for healthy nerve processes; and I decided to pass.

This personal, rational decision about my own body—one related to my own private health issues—abruptly thrust me into a new social and even legal category; one that was created in the start of 2021: that of second-class citizen; “anti-vaxxer” (note the trashy double xs); dissident; weirdo; “conspiracy theorist”; and, though I remained a classical liberal, “Trumper.”

The moment I began asking basic questions on my Twitter feed specifically about the novel mRNA injections—the kinds of questions I had asked for three decades about silicone breast implants; about high estrogen levels in birth control pills; about dangerous IUDs; about vaginal mesh, or industrial hospital birthing practices and high for-profit C-section rates—my bio changed everywhere, online, and all at once. Instead of being described as a leading voice of Third Wave feminism, with a string of honors, degrees, and awards after my name, I was now identified from the first sentence, on Wikipedia and everywhere else, as a “conspiracy theorist.” Not being aware yet that AI had already been deployed journalistically, I did not even understand how that overnight change in my reputation had been accomplished.

I began to be left out of the social events that had resumed, in New York, after almost everyone had rushed to get vaccinated; I was cut off the guest lists that had once sought to have me. Hostesses told me that I was no longer welcome, as the hosts were “being careful.”

Many journalists who had been my colleagues and some even my friends, and who had had no problem in the “Before” world seeking out favors and book endorsements from me, remained silent as I was portrayed as a lunatic and a QAnon aficionado. Others, who knew me and knew better, even joined in the melee.

    ******

After President Joe Biden gave his notorious and factually baseless December 2021 speech about how the unvaccinated were bringing “severe illness and death” onto themselves and everyone else, my friends and even some of my relatives began to shun me—and my equally scandalously unvaccinated husband.

But it’s here now and it’s spreading and it’s gonna increase. . . . We are looking at a winter of severe illness and death for the unvaccinated—for themselves, their families and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm.1

There was no place left for us in communities that aligned with nonsense. We had left New York City at the start of the pandemic and had moved into a little house in the woods in the Hudson Valley. Despite our physical separation from the heart of the culture, this bizarre ostracism really stung. And it went on and on. We were left out of family Thanksgivings. One of my best friends moved out of the city to another country, without saying goodbye; later she explained in an email that she had been “disappointed” in me for my position on the vaccine and the lockdowns. Another one of my oldest friends told me that I could not have dinner with him because “he does not sit indoors with unvaccinated people.” A beloved elderly relative told me I could not even see him outside because he “does not sit outside with unvaccinated people.” A family Christmas vacation was canceled at the last minute, after the President told all our loved ones that we would kill them with our very presence. No one in that world could hear me when I kept explaining that the vaccines did nothing to affect transmission.

It was as if a hex had been cast over everyone I loved, and over the entire culture in which I had, till so recently, felt so at home.

The nail in the coffin came on about June 19, 2021. I had posted a tweet warning that women were experiencing menstrual dysregulation—to say the least—upon having received mRNA vaccines. You don’t have to be a biologist to know that this is a serious signal of something going very wrong with a woman’s health. And it was obvious that if women were having horrible problems with their periods in 2021, there would be fertility issues—as there are—in 2023.

But after I posted this tweet, my world turned upside down. I was deplatformed from Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. A wave of mocking news articles—centering on tweets that did not even exist, tweets I had immediately deleted as being badly worded—appeared simultaneously, in multiple languages, around the globe. Editors at the Sunday Times of London and the Guardian and the Daily Mail—editors who had commissioned my work for decades—ran similar hostile stories; some depicted me falsely as interested in QAnon (I barely knew what that was) and others as “unhinged.” Matt Gertz of Media Matters and CNN mocked my tweet, and did a hit piece on me, for my daring to speak with Tucker Carlson on Fox News about my concerns regarding women’s health. Former New York Times journalist Alex Berenson called me “batshit crazy.” And so on.

Overnight, my world closed. No editor who had formerly commissioned me took my calls or replied to my emails now. An investor in my company withdrew a six-figure investment. I was persona non grata. And it seemed like a blanket fiat. No one who used to invite me to the glittering events of yesterday dared to contact me; not a single legacy media producer would cross the invisible no-go line that cordoned me off from the culture as a thinker. I was radioactive, for telling the truth; for telling the truth about women, as I have always done; for telling the truth about women—related to something unbelievably important.

When the Missouri and Louisiana attorneys general successfully sued the Biden administration,2 we learned that this fiat had been so massive and so absolute because the administration—for whom I had voted—had coordinated with Twitter and Facebook attacks on “misinformation” online. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the Bureau of the Census, Twitter, and Facebook had all colluded to review lists that included my poor, brief, important, accurate tweet. Carol Crawford, “Chief, Digital Media Branch” of the CDC, on May 10, 2021, had sent out a “BOLO (Be On the LookOut)” alert about tweets and had included mine. I was put on a “misinformation” hit list. And so the CDC and the biggest tech companies in the world used the millions of dollars and gargantuan power at their disposal to close down my voice, along with other dissidents’ voices.3 “The below are just some example posts. We do plan to post something shortly to address vaccine shedding and I can send that link soon. Our census team, copied here, has much more info on it if needed. Also, we are standing up a BOLO COVID misinformation meeting and inviting all tech platforms,” wrote Ms Crawford.

My tweet, written in response to someone worried about abnormal bleeding post–mRNA vaccination, which Ms Crawford singled out, read: “Well hundreds of women on this page say they are having bleeding/clotting after vaccination or that they bleed oddly being AROUND vaccinated women. Unconfirmed, needs more investigation. But lots of reports.”

That warning turned out to be accurate and important.

America First Legal also filed a lawsuit, and in July of 2022, they published documents confirming that my tweet, along with other tweets from other commentators warning women about miscarriages and menstrual damage suffered after mRNA injection, was in the CDC’s “BOLO” email alert to tech companies.4

This global reputational attack proved to be both a heartbreak and an opportunity. My life completely changed. I thought that no one would ever want to hear from me again; but, paradoxically, conservative, libertarian, and independent news outlets and podcasters—a whole world of citizens who cared, as I did, about the Constitution, and about women and babies—sought me out. My life changed even more powerfully when in early 2022, the Pfizer documents were released via court order—the FDA had asked the court to keep them hidden for seventy-five years—and I was prompted by Steve Bannon on his podcast, WarRoom, to organize scientists and physicians into a phalanx of experts to read through the highly technical documents and to write reports explaining what was in them.

I was joined, rather miraculously, by the only person whom I can imagine running such a complex, important undertaking: Amy Kelly, the program director overseeing the dozens and then hundreds and finally thousands of experts who sought to join this historic undertaking. She is also now my company DailyClout’s chief operating officer. A petite, lovely woman with shoulder-length blonde curls like those of a heroine in an Edwardian novella, her steely mind and inexplicably effective organizational genius defy every stereotype. She turned thousands of experts into an unstoppable truth machine, capable of confronting and ultimately overcoming phalanxes and battalions of lies.

At last, 3,250 distinguished doctors and scientists, including pathologists, oncologists, radiologists, cardiologists, sports medicine physicians; registered nurses and nurse practitioners; biologists; lab clinicians; medical fraud investigators; biostatisticians; and other experts joined our project. These experts—all working as volunteers, simply for the sake of real science and medicine, and for the good of humanity—produced what I consider to be some of the most important journalism of our time: the eighty-four reports that reveal that Pfizer committed the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history; with a special focus on destroying the reproductive capacity of human females.5

“As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result,” concludes Joseph, in Genesis 50:20.6 The highest levels of power in this country sought to silence me; yet I was sent by this cancellation on a journey that brought me new friends, new insights, new questions, and the privilege, along with Amy Kelly and these courageous volunteers, of alerting the world to a danger that put humanity itself in jeopardy.

Today Pfizer has lost 89 percent of its manufacturing demand, and at least a substantial portion of humans are going to survive its assault.

What readers will find in this book is a story of a world that changed, bit by bit, into its dark opposite. I am sure it mirrors many of their own stories.

On looking back, I see that I sought to describe three things. First, I wanted simply to be an accurate and reliable witness to a world in a state of degradation and, I hope, also to testify to seeds of its rebirth. In this task, I bore in mind a work by an “ordinary citizen,” a German scholar of French literature, Victor Klemperer, who kept a journal during the descent into barbarism of the Nazi years. It was published as I Will Bear Witness: A Diary of the Nazi Years, 1933–1941.7 When I read that book, I realized how important it was to have such journals, since they record indeed how fascism does not descend overnight, but moment by moment, loss by small loss. I was also very moved by and related to Klemperer’s stance squarely in the ideals of the Enlightenment—in his belief that culture and literature, the ideals of civilization, cannot be abandoned and must ultimately surely save us again. His faith in the ideals of the Enlightenment, and of a civilized culture, heightened his shock and outrage when those ideals were trampled before his eyes. I too feel, as I witness the destruction of our world today in the West, that we must cherish the memories of a civilized and literate society if we are to save one another and rebuild. So, one task I set myself was simply to, as Klemperer did, “bear witness.”

A second theme that drove the writing of this book was my slow-dawning realization that we were not in a normal time of normal bad human politics and normal bad destructive material choices. I realized gradually that the degradation taking place on the material plane simply reflected or manifested a much larger battle—indeed a spiritual battle; one between Good and Evil themselves, and that God—whom till now I hesitated to mention in public—was of course central to what we were witnessing; and He is central, I slowly realized, to whether or not we will survive.

Lastly—relatedly—this book is about how I realized that the pandemic, lockdown, and mandate policies strove to destroy human love, care, and intimacy; that it was human love, care, and intimacy that have saved us, individually and collectively, and that will save us again, if we are to be saved. And I discovered that it is only in human love, care, and intimacy, ultimately, that God lives, and moves in, and rescues, if they are to be rescued, our lives.

Will we live through this? I have concluded, as you will see, that that is up to choices we now make. The attack on humanity is far from over. Pfizer and Moderna may have crashed as stocks, as I write, in August of 2023,8 but on the near horizon are other existential threats to our liberty and survival, ranging from GMO mosquitoes bearing malaria released intentionally in Texas and Louisiana, to arson-set or negligence-enhanced wildfires that are destroying communities in Canada and Maui as I write, to explosive derailments on our transport systems, to grid outages, to attacks on our food supplies, to the rollout of a central bank digital currency worldwide that can track our spending and cut us off for “social credit” violations; to the debanking of dissident voices, such as Dr. Joseph Mercola’s, recently, by Chase Bank.9 A drumbeat of scary stories about scary COVID variants is audible as well.

Most alarming of all is the insistence by our leaders of a global adherence to a WHO framework that supersedes national sovereignty; if that goes through, anything can be done to us.

I have long been predicting that all of this would unfold, around now. My predictions of all these kinds of attacks, which I made in public over the past two years, are all coming true, and not because I am prescient. They are inevitable now based simply enough on my reading of past histories. The bad guys are not done with us. Their goal is still a global feudalism.

Despite these horrors, and these escalating dangers, I think you will find as you read that I believe that we are also are in a time in which we may witness and receive incredible potential blessings—and experience incredibly rapid evolution—depending on what we choose to do; morally, and as humans fighting for humanity.

This is the story of my cancellation, my survival, my witnessing of an all-out attack on humanity, and my stumbling into an awareness of what holds us and upholds us all.

And this is an account of the unseen gifts and energies and presences along our way; the help and resources—especially as they derive from within our own hearts, deeds, and consciences, human actions that apparently call forth angels—that I believe, in spite of it all, still can save us.

Quote:From New York Times bestselling author Naomi Wolf, Facing the Beast is a devastating, detailed account of wrongthink, deplatforming, and an unexpected political, personal, and spiritual transformation that followed during one of the most divisive times in American history.

In this uncompromising investigation into today’s most urgent issues, Naomi Wolf uses her own wildly politicized pilgrimage―from New York Times bestselling author and high-level Democratic consultant to a journalist cast out from the elite political and social circles she once moved through―as a stunning narrative framework that is both chilling and incisive.

Wolf’s sin? Doing the job that good journalists once prided themselves on: asking questions, challenging authority, and, during one of the most politically divisive moments in modern history, exposing the many failures of the public health response during the COVID-19 pandemic by chronicling the dangerous descent of our democracy into tyranny, censorship, and totalitarianism.

Unable to remain silent in the shadows and unwilling to collude with the mainstream, Wolf bravely covers topics that few other writers dare to address critically for fear of being deplatformed. Facing the Beast explores reproductive rights, medical freedom, the uncurious thought-policing of the “progressive” left, the Second Amendment, the criminal relationship between the FDA and Pfizer―Wolf’s clear writing repeatedly shines light in the dark corners of our fractured society.

A decades-long champion of free speech, freedom of the press, and the Constitution, Wolf found herself not only in the midst of a political rebirth but a spiritual transformation as well―one in which the events of the day could only be described in terms of good, evil, and a metaphysical quest on the nature of reality.

For readers of Matt Taibbi, Glenn Greenwald, and Bari Weiss, Facing the Beast is a fearless indictment of legacy media and the political class, as well as a brutal reminder that searching for and defending the truth can be dangerous.

Review
“Naomi Wolf is one of the bravest, clearest-thinking people I know. The reason you hear the forces of repression so desperately trying to dismiss her is because she is right.”―Tucker Carlson

“When Western leaders abandoned reason and embraced the ideology of force several years ago, Naomi Wolf was one of few who understood instantly what was happening. She decided to tell the full truth about it all the time, no matter what. The result has been a thrilling inspiration to those of us who’ve followed it, and for the first time is collected here in one place. Read Facing the Beast to understand what bravery looks like.”―Tucker Carlson

“In the crisis of our lives and of everything we call civilization, Naomi Wolf has been a prescient observer, a keen analyst, and brave fighter for truth and freedom. Everything in her life and career prepared her for this moment. We all owe her a debt of gratitude for what she has done and continues to do for the great cause. Like her last book, Facing the Beast stands as a testament to truth in times gone mad.”―Jeffrey Tucker, president, Brownstone Institute

“Today’s world has been constructed to divide us. Naomi Wolf has seen through the lies and deception. In her personal journey, described in Facing the Beast, she unequivocally came to understand the universal principle―that all of humanity is connected. Dr. Wolf fights for our God-given rights and freedoms. I am honored to call her friend.”―Edward Dowd, author of Cause Unknown

The Virus Challenge: A Guide for the Purple-Pilled
The Expose | Patricia Harrity
Oct 26, 2023

Biomedical Scientist, Simon Lee argues, that there are those who understand that “the globalist establishment is rotten to the core,” they have gone down the rabbit holes and completed the deep dives on everything from the Titanic to the Moon landings, but “if you try to tell them that viruses are not real they will lose their minds.” This is what is termed “purple pilled” and having a foot in the red camp and another in the blue. A challenge has been issued, to settle the Virus, no virus debate and as yet there are no scientific takers,”are you ready to take the red pill, “he asks.
The Virus Challenge: A Guide for the Purple-Pilled

Simon Lee, Science Officer, Anew UK
Are you Purple-Pilled?

James Delingpole recently wrote a brilliant and thought provoking piece titled “Discrediting Our Cause” in which he introduced the concept of the “purple-pilled”. Who are, according to Delingpole:

“Fairweather Awake types – I call them the ‘purple-pilled’ because though they’ve taken the red pill more or less they still want to keep one foot in the blue-pilled camp for old times’ sake – that there are some conspiracy theories out there which are simply beyond the pale. They are so silly, these more outre conspiracy theories, that even to talk about them just discredits ‘our’ cause.”

This got me thinking (as thought provoking articles do) about the virus wars.

I used to believe in viruses. I even did diagnostic tests for viruses in a hospital lab for many years. I never believed any of the covid nonsense when it kicked off in 2020, but at that stage i did still believe that Coronaviruses were real. However, I didn’t believe that they could cause anything more serious than the common cold.

I was aware that some people did not think that viruses were real and that the pictures of alleged viruses were in fact usually exosomes which are particles produced by cells that are damaged and are dying.

So i decided to investigate these claims for myself and began to do some detailed research into the foundational science that supposedly underpinned the diagnostic testing that i used to do.

I discovered some brilliant people like the Kiwi couple Dr Sam Bailey MD and Dr Mark Bailey MD, Mike Stone and his brilliant viroLIEgy website, Dr Thomas Cowan MD, Dr Andrew Kaufman MD, Christine Massey MSc, Dr Stefano Scoglio PhD. There are many others too (see the signatories to the virus challenge further down). I quickly came to recognise that virology is a fraudulent pseudoscience and that there is no good evidence for the existence of pathogenic human viruses.

I’m used to arguing with the “normies” and “sheeple” about all things covid related but now most of the arguing is with so called “truthers” who consider themselves to be red-pilled. In reality these virus believers are what Delingpole calls the “Purple-pilled”.

Yes, they understand that the globalist establishment is rotten to the core and they may have done their research on some real conspiracies like the JFK assassination, the moon landings, 9/11, the Titanic (yes really! Look into it.) etc but if you try to tell them that viruses are not real they will lose their minds.

“If you accept – as all the red-pilled must because it is the foundation of Awake awareness – that the world as it has been sold to us is a tissue of lies, half-truths and deceptions, then it naturally follows that everything we think we know about the world is potentially fallacious.” James Delingpole

Apparently, the fallacious nature of virology is a red pill too many for some. The lab leaked genetically engineered SARS-CoV-2 bioweapon is a great story but it is complete science fiction nonsense.

The conspirators and their mainstream media accomplices are very happy for people to believe this nonsense which is why they are now allowing this narrative to be pushed. They really don’t care whether you believe the “virus” was naturally occurring or was genetically engineed in a lab. All they care about is that you believe that this imaginary virus is real.

They will most likely never admit to the full extent of their lies and deception, especially as it seems likely that they are planning on pulling the same trick again and again and again. Instead, they have opted for the limited hangout lab leaked genetically engineered SARS-CoV-2 bioweapon science fiction story.

This is why it is so important that people are prepared to reassess all the things that they thought they knew to be true by looking at the evidence. Knowledge that contradicts the official version of events is hard won because “You’re up against a vast, intricate, well-funded system of organised deception”.

Your belief system should never be unshakeable and you should always be open minded, especially when you are presented with new evidence. Its quite shocking to see how people who believe themselves to be red-pilled think like normies when it comes to the issue of viruses.

It is no longer intellectually tenable for anyone with a reasonable degree of curiosity, scepticism, and intelligence to still believe in pathogenic human viruses. As Delingpole puts it:

“If you have accepted the truth of even one conspiracy theory, no matter what it is,then you have abnegated the right to declare any other conspiracy off limits.”

If you have already accepted that “there are forces out there so corrupt, powerful, devious, entrenched and malign that they have happily and gleefully lied to you about something really big” then why can’t you accept that they are lying about viruses too? Why is that a step too far?

Many supposed red-pilled people dogmatically cling to the false belief that the “no virus” position is a Psy-op designed to discredit “our cause”. These people have evidently not put in the necessary research to understand the full extent of the lies deployed to create a pseudopandemic.

A degree of humility might be in order for some people who might have to admit to having been wrong ( as Dr Mike Yeadon PhD has graciously done) but “put in the hours and you’ll get there in the end” and the truth will out.

“Far from uniting the resistance, the broad front ‘pragmatism and unity’ strategy has divided and neutralised that resistance by luring a significant portion of it into containment pens. All those people out there who have sensed that something is wrong and are now eager for guidance on what it is are being led into a trap…That trap, essentially, is a state of controlled ignorance.”

James Delingpole

It is claimed, by some, that the “no virus” position might alienate potential allies. The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth should never alienate any decent person especially those who consider themselves to be “truthers”.
The No “Virus” Challenge

The No “Virus” Challenge was originally thought up by Dr. Tom Cowan in conjunction with Dr. Mark Bailey and Dr. Kevin Corbett. It now has many other like minded signatories.

It was established to challenge virology, in order to put their methods to the test, and is designed to meet virology halfway.

The signatories want virology to demonstrate, using their own methods, that they can actually independently reproduce and replicate the exact same results while blinded to the different samples that they would be testing.

If virologists are really interested in following the scientific method and performing the proper control experiments ( that should have been carried out from the very beginning) then there is absolutely no reason for them not to accept this challenge.
Settling the virus debate

Central to the covid pseudopandemic is the accepted wisdom that viruses, defined as replicating, protein-coated pieces of genetic material (either DNA or RNA) , exist as independent entities in the real world and are able to cause disease that can be transmitted from person to person.

These alleged particles, with the protein coating and genetic material inside, are commonly believed to infect living cells, replicate inside these living cells, cause tissue damage as they leave the cell, and, in doing so, can cause disease and sometimes the death of the host. These alleged virus particles are then said to be able to transmit to other people, causing disease in them as well.

Billions have been spent during a century of experimentation, studies, and interventions in this “war against viruses”. This belief has fundamentally changed the trajectory of our world and negatively impacted large sections of humanity, so its way past time that this theory was put to the test.

For several decades, many objective doctors and scientists have been arguing that virology is based on some fundamental misconceptions. They have been arguing that the pictures of “viruses” are in fact the natural and inevitable breakdown products of stressed and/or dead and dying tissues and are not independent, exogenous, pathogenic entities as is commonly claimed.

Therefore they are not pathogens, they are not harmful to other people, and there are no rational or scientific reasons to take measures to protect yourself or others from them.
Data accumulation is not science

Controlled and falsifiable hypothesis-driven experiments are central to the scientific method. In contrast, publications in virology are mostly of a descriptive nature.

Dr Edward R. Dougherty, the Scientific Director of the Center for Bioinformatics and Genomic Systems Engineering, wrote about the epistemological crisis in genomics in 2015:

“High-throughput technologies such as gene-expression microarrays have lead to the accumulation of massive amounts of data, orders of magnitude in excess to what has heretofore been conceivable. But the accumulation of data does not constitute science, nor does the a postiori rational analysis of data.”

Dr Dougherty warned that “contemporary genomic research often fails to satisfy the basic requirements of that epistemology, thereby failing to produce valid scientific knowledge.”

Data accumulation is not science. The collection of data does not replace the requirement for evidence that adheres to the scientific method which requires a valid independent variable (i.e. purified/isolated particles) in order to determine cause and effect. Indirect computer-generated evidence can not take the place of having the necessary direct physical proof. The strings of DNA and RNA letters in a data bank tells us little or nothing of value.
Virus particles have not been isolated

The main argument that the pathogenic viral theory is wrong, is that no published scientific paper has ever shown that particles fulfilling the definition of viruses have been directly isolated and purified from any tissues or bodily fluids of any sick human or animal.

There is general agreement that true “isolation” of these particles is not acheived by virologists, who misuse this term to mean something other than the separation of one thing from all other things.

Proponents of the viral myth have difficulty understanding the meaning of the word “isolation”. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary it is defined as “the act of separating something from other things: the act of isolating something” and isolate is defined as “to select from among others especially: to separate from another substance so as to obtain pure or in a free state”.

Isolation does NOT mean the combination of many elements together. No dictionary defines isolation/isolate as meaning the mixing of many substances together in a cell culture. That is what virologists take it to mean.

Particles that have truly been isolated and purified have not been shown to be replication-competent, disease-causing and infectious, so they do not meet the definition of a virus.

The “evidence” of viruses presented in the form of “genomes” and animal experiments is derived from methodologies lacking sufficient controls as per the scientific method.
Fake genomes

We are supposed to believe that A,C,T,G’s in a computer database is all the evidence that is needed in order to prove the existence of a “virus.” No purified and isolated “virus” is necessary if the computer assembles a theoretical genome of an invisible entity.

Dr Charles Calisher and 13 other experienced virologists warned in 2001:

“A string of DNA letters in a data bank tells little or nothing about how a virus multiplies, which animals carry it, how it makes people sick, or whether antibodies to other viruses might protect against it. Just studying sequences, is like trying to say whether somebody has bad breath by looking at his fingerprints.“

The original “SARS-COV-2” genome is a fraudulent assembly produced from the unpurified bronchial alveolar lavage fluid from one person living in a heavily polluted Chinese city. Every other supposedly mutated genome has been built upon this fraudulent construction. These samples contain genetic material from numerous bacteria, fungi, parasites, as well as the human patient. If the sample has been cell cultured, they also contain the added animal DNA from the cell line as well as the fetal bovine serum used in the medium.

All “viral” sequences are most likely nothing more than a mixture of human, animal, bacterial, fungal, and other unknown sources of genetic material. These mixtures of RNA are claimed to be “viral” and added to a database in order to build a “viral” library. There is no evidence whatsoever that any of this RNA ever came from a “virus.”

It is not possible to buy purified and isolated particles of “SARS-COV-2” which comes directly from the fluids of a sick human, but you can buy lab created cell cultured concoctions supposedly containing this elusive entity known as “SARS-COV-2.”

As far as “viral” RNA is concerned, some companies are selling lab-created cell cultured concoctions and claim that “viral” RNA is contained within it. Interestingly, they do not stand by the accuracy of any claims, as noted in the product sheet for the “viral” RNA product. A company claiming it is selling “viral” RNA, is not proof that they are really selling “viral” RNA, especially when the company will not back the accuracy of any of its claims about its products.
Logical fallacy

A logical fallacy often deployed by virus believers is to shift the burden of proof. They demand that those of us questioning virology must provide an alternative hypothesis to explain why people become ill. In fact, the onus is on those that claim “viruses” exist to back up their assertion with evidence proving the existence of these transmissible pathogenic particles.

The challenge is to test their hypothesis that “viruses” exist and cause disease by performing the proper controlled experiments that should have been performed by virologists from the very beginning.

It is not necessary to provide an alternative hypothesis as to what is causing disease in order to disprove the current “viral” hypothesis.

There are numerous factors which can cause disease. Covid-19 is not a single disease with just one cause, it is a misdiagnosis based on no new or specific symptoms, as well as fraudulent and unreliable test results.

PCR test results are 100% inaccurate as no PCR test has ever been calibrated and validated against purified and isolated particles assumed to be “viruses.” The FDA had “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV virus” and Drosten developed the fraudulent PCR miraculously “without having virus material available.” but instead used “synthetic nucleic acid technology”.
Dr Sam Bailey Throws Down the Gauntlet 



According to Dr Sam Bailey MD, the following experiments would need to be successfully completed before the viral theory can be deemed factual: 

1. A unique particle with the characteristics of a virus is purified from the tissues or fluids of a sick living being. The purification method to be used is at the discretion of the virologists but electron micrographs must be provided to confirm the successful purification of morphologically-identical alleged viral particles.

2. The purified particle is biochemically characterized for its protein components and genetic sequence. 

3. The proteins are proven to be coded for by these same genetic sequences. 

4. The purified viral particles alone, through a natural exposure route, are shown to cause identical sickness in test subjects, by using valid controls.

5. Particles must then be successfully re-isolated (through purification) from the test subject at 4 above, and demonstrated to have exactly the same characteristics as the particles found in step 1.

All attempts to demonstate the above have so far failed.

Virologists claim that “viruses” cannot be found in sufficient numbers in the tissues of any sick person or animal to allow such an analysis. This makes no sense at all. These particles are supposedly present in sufficient numbers to cause illness in the individual and also to transfer the illness to other people. So why can’t they be found in-situ?
The virus challenge proposes to meet the virologists half way:

“In the first instance, we propose that the methods in current use are put to the test. The virologists assert that these pathogenic viruses exist in our tissues, cells and bodily fluids because they claim to see the effects of these supposed unique particles in a variety of cell cultures. This process is what they call “isolation” of the virus. They also claim that, using electron microscopy, they can see these unique particles in the results of their cell cultures.

Finally, they claim that each “species” of pathogenic virus has its unique genome, which can be sequenced either directly from the bodily fluids of the sick person or from the results of a cell culture. We now ask that the virology community prove that these claims are valid, scientific and reproducible.

Rather than engaging in wasteful verbal sparring, let us put this argument to rest by doing clear, precise, scientific experiments that will, without any doubt, show whether these claims are valid.”
The Virus challenge proposal

The signatories to the virus challenge propose the following experiment as the first step in determining whether such an entity as a pathogenic human virus exists…

“STEP ONE  5 virology labs worldwide would participate in this experiment and none would know the identities of the other participating labs. A monitor will be appointed to supervise all steps. Each of the 5 labs will receive five nasopharyngeal samples from four categories of people (i.e. 20 samples each), who either:  1) are not currently in receipt of, or being treated for a medical diagnosis;  2) have received a diagnosis of lung cancer;  3) have received a diagnosis of influenza A (according to recognized guidelines); or who  4) have received a diagnosis of ‘COVID-19’ (through a PCR “test” or lateral flow assay.) 

Each person’s diagnosis (or “non-diagnosis”) will be independently verified, and the pathology reports will be made available in the study report. The labs will be blinded to the nature of the 20 samples they receive. Each lab will then attempt to “isolate” the viruses in question (Influenza A or SARS-CoV-2) from the samples or conclude that no pathogenic virus is present.

Each lab will show photographs documenting the CPE (cytopathic effect), if present, and explain clearly each step of the culturing process and materials used, including full details of the controls or “mock-infections”.

Next, each lab will obtain independently verified electron microscope images of the “isolated” virus, if present, as well as images showing the absence of the virus (presumably, in the well people and people with lung cancer). The electron microscopist will also be blinded to the nature of the samples they are analyzing. All procedures will be carefully documented and monitored.

STEP TWO  ALL of the samples will then be sent for genomic sequencing and once again the operators will remain blinded to the nature of their samples. It would be expected that if 5 labs receive material from the same sample of a patient diagnosed with COVID-19, each lab should report IDENTICAL sequences of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 genome.

On the other hand, this genome should not be found in any other samples. (Note: this statement is a brief outline of the suggested experiments – a fully detailed protocol would obviously need to be developed and agreed upon by the laboratories and signatories.)

If the virologists fail to obtain a satisfactory result from the above study, then their claims about detecting “viruses” will be shown to be unfounded. All of the measures put in place as a result of these claims should be brought to an immediate halt. If they succeed in this first task then we would encourage them to proceed to the required purification experiments to obtain the probative evidence for the existence of viruses.

It is in the interest of everyone to address the issue of isolation, and the very existence, of alleged viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. This requires proof that the entry of morphologically and biochemically, virus-like particles into living cells is both necessary and sufficient to cause the appearance of the identical particles, which are contagious and disease causing.

We welcome your support and feedback for this initiative.

Signatories,

Thomas Cowan, MD  Mark Bailey, MD  Samantha Bailey, MD  Jitendra Banjara, MSc    Kelly Brogan, MD  Kevin Corbett, PhD  Mufassil Dingankar, BHMS Michael Donio, MS  Jordan Grant, MD  Andrew Kaufman, MD  Valentina Kiseleva, MD  Christine Massey, MSc    Paul McSheehy, PhD  Prof. Timothy Noakes, MD  Sachin Pethkar, BAMS  Saeed Qureshi, PhD  Stefano Scoglio, PhD  Mike Stone, BEXSc    Amandha Vollmer, NDoc Michael Yeadon, PhD”

Any takers?

So the challenge has been issued. Are there any scientific takers? So far, apparently not.

And what about you? Are you ready to swallow the no virus red pill yet? It’s not a bitter pill to swallow so a spoonful of sugar is not required to help it go down. Just a pinch of humility in some cases.

References

1) James Delingpole: How red-pilled arbiters of truth discredit our cause BY RHODA WILSON ON AUGUST 30, 2023 The Expose. https://expose-news.com/2023/08/30/how-r...our-cause/

2) SETTLING THE VIRUS DEBATE 14 July 2022 https://drsambailey.com/resources/settli...us-debate/

3) On the Epistemological Crisis in Genomics. Edward R Dougherty. Curr Genomics. 2008 Apr; 9(2): 69–79. PMID: 19440447 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2674806/

4) The “Virus” of Sin. Mike Stone. https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/26/the-virus-of-sin/

5) The No “Virus” Challenge. Mike Stone. https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/15/the-no-...challenge/

https://expose-news.com/2023/10/25/the-v...le-pilled/

Covid Vaccines: The Great Travesty Against Mankind
By Vasko Kohlmayer
October 21, 2023

“More than 5.55 billion people worldwide have received a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, equal to about 72.3 percent of the world population,” observed the New York Times in March of this year.

In other words, in the space of twenty-seven months (since the beginning of the rollout), the vaccinators had managed to inject nearly two thirds of the world’s inhabitants with their COVID medicaments. Furthermore, the majority of the vaccinated were subjected to more than one dose. In total more than 13.5 billion injections were administered across the planet.

To pull this off in such a short period of time makes the COVID vaccination campaign one of the most impressive logistical and organizational feats ever accomplished.

A fatal flaw, however, has marred the whole COVID vaccination enterprise: it was a blatant fraud from beginning to end.

To begin with, the whole thing was based on a false premise. We were told that in SARS-CoV-2 we were up against a highly dangerous virus that posed a potentially lethal threat to those who contracted it and that vaccines were the only sure way to escape the scourge. This was a lie. For healthy people of productive age the infection fatality rate was about as high as that of the seasonal flu. For healthy children and young people the danger of a serious outcome was virtually nil.

Lauded as both “safe and effective,” the vaccines turned out to be anything but that. To begin with, it quickly became quite clear that the vaccines would not protect against infection. Only some five months after the start of the vaccination campaign, the authorities started speaking about the need for a booster. This obviously meant that the initial two doses of Pfizer and Moderna (one in the case of Johnson & Johnson) failed to protect their recipients from the SARS-CoV-2 virus beyond a very limited amount of time.

But the first booster also failed to confer any lasting protection and soon a second booster was required. The second booster, however, proved as ineffective as the first booster and a third booster was said to be necessary. But the third booster also failed, and a fourth booster was needed.

Currently, we are on the sixth shot and counting. And this less than 34 months after the COVID vaccines were first introduced. In other words, to keep fully vaccinated as per recommendations from our health authorities, one would have had to have been injected every five months or so.

But even those who got every booster on schedule were not protected against contracting COVID-19. We learn from the website of the Mayo Clinic: “People who are up to date on their vaccines can get breakthrough infections. They can then spread the virus to others.”

When pressed about this issue during a hearing of the European Parliament in October of last year, a Pfizer representative admitted that the company had never tested the vaccines to see whether they would prevent transmission.

What an astonishing admission that was. The objective of vaccines has always been to protect their recipients from the disease for which they were administered thus limiting the spread of infection in the population.

The COVID-19 “vaccines” are the first vaccines in history that do neither protect against infection nor slow its spread.

Do you remember when Joe Biden promised us during a Townhall meeting in 2021 that “you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.”

Turns out this was a massive lie. It was brazen disinformation coming from the very top of the US government.

The majority of the injected came down with COVID and most of them more than once. In fact, it appears that getting “vaccinated” against COVID increases one’s chances of contracting COVID. Just ask Joe and Jill Biden who despite being jabbed multiple times have been repeatedly sickened with the disease.

We must ask ourselves, “What kind of vaccines are these?” Never has the world witnessed such a thing — vaccines that require a booster every few months and apparently make their recipients more likely to fall ill with the very disease against which they are supposed to protect.

Neither will the vaccines protect people from serious COVID outcomes. The majority of people who get serious COVID or die of COVID have been vaccinated. That the vaccines are grossly ineffective is becoming clear even to most of those who were previously brainwashed by our corrupt governments and medical authorities. A study published earlier this month found that “uptake of boosters has stalled in the United States at less than 20% of the eligible population.” Please note that the 20% uptake figure refers to only the eligible population. This means that only a small fraction of the whole population has opted to receive the COVID injections. Only 17% of Americans chose to receive the previous booster. This time around the number will be even lower. By now most people have seen through the fraud.

Not only are the vaccines ineffective, but they are also very dangerous. Since the rollout of the vaccination campaign, there has been an explosion of adverse reaction reports across the world. In the United States, the reports related to the COVID shots in the VAERS database exceed those related to all the other vaccines combined. There is no doubt that the COVID vaccines are the most dangerous vaccines ever devised and that by a long shot.

Already early in 2022, there were more than one thousand articles and studies published in scientific journals discussing the adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccines. Some of the effects listed include conditions such as pericarditis, myopericarditis, death, Guillain-Barre syndrome, acute venous thromboembolism, lymphadenopathy, acute thrombosis of the coronary tree, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, T-cell lymphoma, aphasia, and thrombophilia among others.

The wider public, however, was never informed about these studies by our government and the medical establishment, both of which are corrupted to the core.

According to a survey conducted by Rasmussen at the end of last year, nearly 30 percent of Americans thought they knew someone who had been killed by a COVID vaccine. This number is undoubtedly much higher today as we keep hearing the news of healthy people who keep inexplicably dying. The stories of hundreds of healthy athletes who have been collapsing and dying since the beginning of the vaccination campaign are especially revealing.

According to researcher Steve Kirsch the death rate of the COVID vaccines is roughly 1 in 1000 doses. This translates into 676,000 dead Americans. It turns out, however, that Kirsch’s analysis, which is based on a breakdown of VAERS figures, may be too conservative. Working with data from 17 countries on all-cause mortality, researchers with Canada-based Correlation Research in the Public Interest have come to the conclusion that the death rate of the COVID-19 shots is somewhere in the region of 1 in 800 doses. They estimate that the vaccines have killed some 17 million people worldwide.

As a point of comparison, the number of people exterminated by the Nazis in the Holocaust was about 6 million.

If even the most conservative estimates are correct, the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, the bulk of which was carried out under false pretences and coercive mandates, constitutes the greatest crime ever committed against humanity.

Unbelievably, so far no one — either in government or in the medical establishment — has been held responsible for this travesty.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/10/vask...t-mankind/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/KKmfRS3Eir9G/

It’s October and this is video 330.

Everything I’m going to tell you is true and so, since it’s all provably honest, accurate and significant it’s almost certainly illegal for me to continue with this video. Worse still, it’s almost certainly also illegal for you to listen to me. And on top of that you’re probably not old enough to hear what I’m going to tell you.

Still there? OK. I take no responsibility if you get into trouble for hearing any of this. Because, believe me, they – that’s the conspirators and the collaborators - don’t want you to hear any of this.

For years now the authorities have been banning me with malice aforethought. Early in 2020 my newly founded YouTube channel was closed and banned and all my videos were deleted. I was actually told that I was banned for life and that I couldn’t even look at other people’s videos. That was no great loss since everyone on YouTube is obviously either a gerbil or part of the problem. I moved to Brand New Tube and they closed that down. Facebook refused to let me join because they said I would be a threat to their community. And if their community is frightened of me but not of Mark Zuckerberg then they’ve got problems and I don’t want to join. Every social media site refused to let me join and punished anyone who dared share my videos or articles. I used to have an account with Linkedin – heaven knows why – and that was closed without warning. The Royal Society of Arts expelled me because I had been telling the truth and been attacked by the BBC on Panorama – without being given the opportunity to appear on the programme. I was banned from speaking at a conference for NHS staff. I was hired to speak about drug side effects but after drug companies objected to my presence I was replaced with a drug industry spokesman. I used to have foreign publishers in over 50 countries – producing books in 26 languages. The Chinese Government stopped my publishers there from publishing my books – and actually forbad all Chinese publishers from producing books by Western authors. That was all because of a column criticising vaccination which I wrote for a Chinese newspaper. My German publishers dumped big selling books. Attempts were made to block a reprints of my book The Medicine Men – first published in 1975 and `Paper Doctors’ from 1976. Today, none of my former agents or publishers dares talk to me so now I proudly publish my books myself. I’m banned by all mainstream media and libelled by what I suspect are CIA controlled thugs at Wikipedia and Google. The last time I tried to speak anywhere, three or four theatre owners cancelled the gig. People don’t dare interview me because if they do they lose their PayPal account or whatever. The last time I did an internet radio interview 17 minutes mysteriously disappeared from the programme before it was aired. My videos used to have millions of views. These days they are hidden away, suppressed and difficult to find because they contain commercially and politically inconvenient truths.

And on and on it goes. You get the message. Oh, and don’t try to visit my website vernoncoleman.org because that’s gone and won’t be coming back. It was a slow death. A few months ago, over 25 million people a month were visiting that site alone. That’s more than three times as many as watch the BBC’s flagship Newsnight programme. But suppression and shadow banning cut that in half – still far more than Newsnight. Now my vernoncoleman.org site has gone.

However, my other site vernoncoleman.com is still alive. Or it was when I started this video. You can find articles, videos and books there. That website has been there since 1992 – long before anyone thought of Google – and in those days 75% of the website’s visitors were the American army, the CIA and the FBI.

It’ll soon be four years since the covid fraud – I originally called it a hoax – was first launched and since I called out the fraudsters, the liars and the scaremongers. Since then the suppression, censorship, bans and abuse have been endless.

Now why would that be?

If you said because I’ve been telling the truth you’re right. Everything I’ve said in 330 videos, several thousand articles and all my books on covid and the Great Reset has been absolutely accurate. Hundreds of so-called fact checkers have huffed and puffed and lied a good deal but they still haven’t found one error.

And there’s another way I can prove I can telling the truth – no one supporting the official line has dared accept my constantly repeated challenge to debate with me. I challenged the Government and its advisors. I challenged the BBC. I challenged the BMA.

Silence from all of them. They dare not debate because they know they’ll lose the debate and their lies will be exposed. The fact is that in 2020 there were no more deaths than in any ordinary year. The flu officially disappeared because covid-19 was the flu. The number of deaths alleged to be caused by covid-19 was wildly exaggerated because everyone who had a positive PCR test was labelled a covid patient – even if they’d been run over by a bus.

The covid hoax was the biggest medical fraud of all time. Every doctor who injected anyone with the covid vaccine is a criminal who should be struck off the medical register and sent to prison. That’s what I said back in 2020 and I’m going to show you why I was right.

It’s time for a cold, hard look at the evidence that has accumulated.

The first piece of crucial evidence appeared in March 2020 when the British Government’s own advisors announced that the new infection – the coronavirus which was being promoted as the new plague was, in fact, no more dangerous than the annual flu.

That’s what they said. And the link to their advice is on www.vernoncoleman.com

Naturally, the Government ignored its own advisors and instead listened to a mathematical modeller called Ferguson, and his team, whose ability to get things very wrong was already legendary. He’d already been very pessimistic and completely wrong about foot and mouth disease, mad cow disease, bird flu and swine flu.

You’d have thought that any doctor with functioning brain tissue would have spotted the warning signs by now.

But no, the entire medical establishment – most of it linked by brain and wallet to the pharmaceutical industry in general and the bit that makes vaccines in particular – joined in the scaremongering and put their trust in the man who got things wrong for a living instead of the expert medical committee which had said it’s just the flu.

And before long, as I’d warned back in February and March 2020, there was talk of a compulsory vaccination programme.

And that’s where everything got very, very dirty and quite insane. And that’s when 99.99% of GPs and hospital doctors abandoned the Hippocratic Oath, the ethical guidelines handed down at Nuremburg and every ethical code in existence, and started injecting everyone who stood still for two minutes with an experimental, toxic pseudo-vaccine which never did what they said it would it do but which turned out to be the most dangerous single substance since the rise to popularity of napalm. Actually, I apologise for that because I don’t want the manufacturers of napalm to sue me. The vaccine which doctors started injecting will kill far, far more people than napalm – if it hasn’t done so already.

In the summer and autumn of 2020 I made a series of widely banned videos in which I warned about the side effects that would be associated with the new covid-19 jabs. I didn’t base my warnings on something I’d read on a cornflake packet. I got hold of the warnings issued by the Food and Drug Administration – the FDA – which is usually regarded as a fairly dull but reliable body.

And this is the Working Draft List of health problems (it’s available on this website) which the FDA – and then I – warned about in the later stages of 2020 – before doctors began earning an extra £50,000 a year each by jabbing people with a vaccine which was too dangerous to use as landfill. These are the side effects I warned about.

Guillain-Barre syndrome
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Transverse myelitis
Encephalitis
Myelitis
Encephalomyelitis
Meningoencephalitis
Meningitis
Encephalopathy
Convulsions
Seizures
Stroke
Narcolepsy
Cataplexy
Anaphylaxis
Acute myocardial infarction
Myocarditis
Pericarditis
Autoimmune disease
Death
Pregnancy, Birth outcomes
Other acute demyelinating diseases
Non anaphylactic allergy reactions
Thrombocytopenia
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
Venous thromboembolism
Arthritis
Arthralgia
Joint pain
Kawasaki disease
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

That’s the list. Not my list. That was the list the FDA in the US produced. You can find the video warning about all this on www.vernoncoleman.com and dated December 2020.

Not one doctor in a 1000 knew about those dangers because they didn’t bother to look at the evidence. They preferred to listen to Dolly Parton and the Queen. Doctors, politicians and journalists insisted that the vaccine – which had been shown not to stop people getting the new flu – was entirely safe. The BBC said it was safe for children. Every celebrity with a book, TV show or record to promote said the covid-19 vaccine was the safest, most effective, most wonderful thing since the hula hoop and platform shoes. YouTube was full to the brim with people telling you that the vaccine was going to save the world and that everyone should have one straight away. And some of those YouTube promoters were making an absolute fortune. For the record I never monetised my short-lived YouTube channel because I didn’t want my videos contaminated with ads and I thought the whole subject too important to be contaminated with ads flogging hearing aids and curtains.

And, of course, every honest doctor with a brain was condemned and thrown into the wilderness to be eaten by the media jackals who had forgotten the basic principles of journalism – if they’d ever known them – and who were now merrily defending lies and kicking the life out of anyone who dared to tell the truth.

Since then the evidence proving that the covid jabs were useless and dangerous has mounted. Two to three years ago I produced videos showing that the vaccine was going to cause brain damage and increase the risk of cancer recurring in patients in remission. I warned about the extra hazards if the needle went straight into a blood vessel. And I talked about pathogenic priming and explained how and why those who had been jabbed would have damaged immune systems and would be susceptible to infections.

And constantly, my videos and articles were banned, condemned and censored.

Now just look at the death rates linked to the vaccine. Look at the figures in the UK and the US. The figures are readily available.

Today, there are doctors all around the world who agree that the covid-19 vaccine should never have been given. It’s a pity they’ve come to the party a little late, having to step over the piles of bodies to get to the drinks, but I suppose we should be gracious and welcome them.

On the other hand, there are still armies of doctors and nurses who are merrily jabbing patients with the stuff. In the last week or so I’ve had an email, a text and a letter telling me to get jabbed. And now they’re giving children an attenuated flu vaccine. If the attenuated virus becomes live then how many Grannies and Grandads are going to die this winter?

It’s funny isn’t it. The media quite rightly had a fit of the hysterics when a young nurse was accused of killing babies. But doctors and the BBC can promote a vaccine that kills babies and everyone thinks that’s fine and dandy. Knighthoods and book contracts all round.

I have, by the way, sent copies of my first two books about covid to the UK’s covid inquiry. But you will be astonished to hear that I haven’t been invited to give evidence.

Still, there’s one good thing that has come out of all this.

The distrust of the covid jab is spreading and the uptake of the scores of childhood vaccines which are promoted by evil governments and dangerous doctors is down massively. All around the world parents are saying `No’ when doctors want to jab their children with vaccines which, let me tell you, have never been properly tested. No one has ever tested to see what effect all these different vaccines have on a growing child. Over a decade ago I wrote a book called `Anyone who tells you vaccines are safe and effective is lying’. And although there have been many attempts to ban the book it’s still around because it’s all true and you can’t bury the truth.

There’s evidence, for example, showing that when the polio vaccine was introduced the number of people with polio went up, not down.

Naturally, the nutters – the same people who think climate change is real – want more vaccines.

We have to stop them. Vaccination is one small part of the global conspiracy.

Thank you for listening.

If the men in cheap suits come round and try to arrest you for listening, just tell them you thought you were at a lecture on the significance of 17th century poetry. Or that you were having a sandwich and didn’t listen.

Thank you for watching. And a special thanks if you managed to find and watch the other, mostly very successfully, suppressed 329 videos. You probably feel as weary as I do.

If you want to keep in touch in future please do so by visiting vernoncoleman.com. There are no adverts and no fees and we’re open 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You’ll always be very welcome. Just wipe your feet as you enter the website please and if you have difficulty getting through, please try again.

Finally, please remember you are not alone. More and more people are waking up. And once they’re awake they don’t go back to sleep.

Distrust the Government, avoid mass media and fight the lies.

And thank you for watching an old man in a chair.

https://www.vernoncoleman.com/hidthecovid.htm

The Lockdown Has Changed People
October 24, 2023

People Are Different Since The Pandemic
Is it just me?

Makow - Whether it's COVID, Migrants, Trannies, Ukraine, or Gaza, the Satanists have found many ways to slice and dice society. It's time to UNITE around our common enemy, the Rothschild WEF, which is responsible for most of our woes.

"People seem different, I absolutely loathe retail shopping now. Rude, selfish, and inconsiderate people are everywhere that give you the death stare. It feels like they're in their own world and nothing else outside of it matters. The same goes for driving, I love driving but now I loathe that too.

It's like people have very short fuses, always reacting to things that should never be a problem in the first place. Everyone I speak to has constant brain fog and it's like they're in a trance.

I used to enjoy being out in the city. Now I don't; it's very much a different vibe."

EDIT 1: Wow, it's quite clear that I'm not alone here. Maybe we who see things outside of the consortium can clearly see things going down hill.

EDIT 2: Did not expect it to blow up with so many like-minded individuals. I guess now is the time to form strong communities within the areas we live.

Comments are from this site:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comm..._pandemic/
---
"Whether people knew the pandemic was BS, or whether they thought it was real, everyone has unresolved trauma.

I'm still angry that nobody wants to discuss it hold people accountable, and see how to prevent this from happening again.

People who thought it was real (or at least couldn't emotionally allow themselves to accept it was BS) want to just move on like nothing happened.

Unresolved trauma, on a worldwide scale.

-----
"People are in extremely deep denial about the fact that it's being revealed openly that they just got played for fools for the past 3.5 years. Not to mention the psychological effects of masking, which was never healthy or necessary. There was so much research in behavioral psychology regarding the human need for expressive communication in faces. Everyone acted like that was a "conspiracy theory" in 2020, like the Stillface experiment never existed. All of the cognitive dissonance is coming home to roost and the worst part is that most of these people still don't even understand what's been done to them."

---
YES. and also what happened was a big trauma installment program. A traumatized broken people are easier to control. they use MKUltra techniques on everyone and it's quite effective. trauma is how you break people.
-
This is what happens when everyone is locked into jobs to pay bills, and those jobs barely pay the bills anymore. People literally exude scarcity on all levels; mood, physical movement, everything. This is what the elite wanted and they're getting it. It's a shame we have to live with AND pay for it at the same time.
--
People have become so immersed in their gadgets that it seems nobody exists outside of their gadgets.

It simply coincides with everyone being broke, overworked (or no work at all but still no $), not only ridiculous, but IMPOSSIBLE cost of living, and very little hope in this world. So every time you go out in public, the chances are high that you're gonna encounter a sh*t ton of mad/desperate people who simply have zero time or patience for pleasantries.
---
The greatest trick the elite ever pulled was convincing every family that both the mom and dad had to work, under the guise of women's rights. Instead, it should have been acceptable for the mom or dad to work. We destroyed families and stagnated wage growth for a generation by doubling the size of the workforce.
----
More importantly: They NEED there to be a huge difference between what they have and what you have. It's important that a large number of us have basically nothing. Neofeudalism requires this to keep the peasants too poor to organize against them.
---
100%... people are ruder, on edge & have no time for anyone. Just yesterday, I was in a drive-through queue & the woman in the car behind me was losing her sh*t, shouting at me & others for no reason. It's a daily occurrence to come across angry, rude people post-pandemic.
---
I see it every single day. People are entitled and rude as hell. The pandemic has also caused even the most mundane of tasks to take longer and be more difficult. I try to remind myself that we are all fighting unseen battles and trying to just do the best we can but there is no reason for all the rudeness. This world needs more kindness so I attempt to treat everyone with respect and save my breakdowns and hissy fits for the privacy of my own home.

-

societal-breakdown.jpeg
There has been a disturbance in the force and I think everyone can definitely feel it. I believe we all have PTSD from covid, lockdowns, and the shitshow that has been the last few years. This has been a long time coming but COVID was the straw that broke the camel's back now add in inflation and fear for what the future holds with WWIII right around the corner and it's no wonder why everyone is tense, angry, depressed, demoralized, and ready to throw down at a moments notice. I have to admit I am extremely cautious of others and try to keep interacting with strangers at a minimum.
--

Yeah no sh*t. The elite are aware of the torment their policies cause to the masses. As the rich get richer and the poor get poorer the poor will become more and more angry. Because they are continually getting fucked over and are stuck.
--

Spike protein is lodged in all our brain stems and pre-frontal cortex. Affects both autonomic function and planning/decision-making. Perfect storm.

-

Yeah, people's brains broke. I worked in a nursing home in NY and saw all logic and reason leave peoples' heads in real time.
--

I find everyone now is guarded; you don't want to offer any opinions that aren't in line with the MSM if you don't want an instant argument.
-

I have been wanting to make a post about this. I really think lack of sleep is a primary cause of this. Humans truly need 7-8 hours and almost no one I know is getting it. It's worse since the pandemic and the increased stickiness of social media algorithms for our attention at night. When I started to make a deliberate effort to always get 8 hours of sleep, it made such a difference to me cognitively. When I go out in public, I see how most people are not fully awake, and I think it's an apt description. Sleep deprived so they are not fully wakeful.

--

I stayed home all day yesterday to avoid the overwhelming negative energy that almost feels tangible at this point it's so thick amongst crowds. I'd rather cuddle with my dog and read a book/Reddit. I feel like I need to protect my mental health from the populace I'm surrounded by on a regular basis.

-

Dogs are great. they haven't changed. I admire their optimism and their openness to life.

-

and it's like people purposely get in my way to then have to make a deal about getting out of the way,

Holy sh*t, so it's not just me. This microaggressive move is SO irritating. Noticed this one a lot more too. People will clearly see you in their peripheral and then like get in your way or occupy a space in front of you. From driving to grocery store shopping. Forcing you to have to either wait for them (where they then proceed to move extra slow on purpose) or interact (usually negatively) to have them move or disperse. It's so unnecessary and aggravating. Definitely notice it too.

-
Sign of the times

2 Timothy 3:1-5 King James Version

3 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.

2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,

3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,

4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

-

smile2.png
Everyone's changed. I think they ruined our life. I want out of the town I live in, it's so depressing. Vaxxed zombies mostly. I'm hanging out in small towns just to see a few people who smile once in a while and have some emotions left.

--
As someone who didn't take the vax (including my spouse and children), and lives in a very blue state, I especially felt a monumental shift in the collective psyche of people around me. People became programmed to irrationally hate. These type of people actually seemed happier for a while during COVID-19 as they rode the wave of the moral high ground and the false belief that they were this noble and wise group that was so right and so educated that they were saving the world like good little world citizens.

I think after a while, they started realizing that maybe things weren't going the way their narrative and their government had promised. What a letdown that the maligned and disgusting "conspiracy theorists" may have been right. That's disparaging. Also having unknown amounts of experimental juice in your body has got to be disparaging. How do you mentally deal with something like that? And for people like me and my family who were threatened with total social and financial annihilation, how do we not become a little bit afraid to socialize with new people? I know I am always wary of things now like, "Would this person have loaded my family onto a train to the concentration camp if they could have?"... because as insane as that sounds, that's where things would have headed if we didn't have a mostly Conservative Supreme Court. And the majority of people didn't even care.

How do we come back from this?

-

Everyone's broke and miserable.

-

I always wondered if the vaccines have made people more neurotic. I've heard others bring it up too, so I know it's not just me that thinks this.
-

The government broke the social contract

-

Finally, people are suspicious. Let's face it: most folks fell for the propaganda and now they're embarrassed or angry. Not only did everybody get Covid, but many got injured from the shots as well. Plus, everyone but the boomers abandoned state media for social media and it's so easy to see the mountain of lies, deception, and plain fraud. People have woken up but at a cost.

-

natural-beauty-reminder.jpeg
(we live in the Kingdom of Heaven)

Constant narcissism and rage as if the world belongs to them, I'm seeing this EVERYWHERE I go and it's unlike anything I've seen before.

I've noticed a lot of people seem to have brain fog or just their brains turned off? It's happening a lot in public spaces and on the roadways, almost as if people are glitching out of reality. Spooky stuff

https://henrymakow.com/2023/10/-people-a...since.html

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/msu-profess...exonerated

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-died-su...s-unvaxxed

Quote:Archbishop Viganò: Priests and Bishops Who Promoted ‘Lethal’ COVID Jabs Must Answer to God
Carlo Maria Viganò
23 October 2023

Three years ago I was among the first – and certainly the first Bishop – to denounce pandemic and vaccination fraud. Expressed with arguments that today emerge as true and well-founded are the critical issues and immorality of an experimental gene treatment, which aborted fetuses were and are used to produce. I also wrote two open letters to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which remain unanswered.

There were those in conservative circles who went so far as to attack me personally and resorted to the unproven and clearly false statements of a doctor who worked with her husband for Big Pharma.

I expressed my dismay at the silence of the bishops, priests, and parish pastors, of many religious workers involved in hospitals, and at the servile zeal with which the Catholic Hierarchy conformed to the crazy and criminal health regulations and Bergoglio’s promotion of the serum. I was publicly insulted on television and in the media, while my brother bishops were silent. Faced with a crime against humanity that has continued to take place before our eyes for three years with the approval and encouragement of Bergoglio, I would have thought that many Pastors would have found the courage to raise their voices and join in my denunciation of the plan of world depopulation implemented by the Word Economic Forum, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the WHO, and the UN, while the funds of these criminals were also given to the Vatican, transforming Bergoglio into a vaccine salesman and a supporter of climate fraud, which has now become “magisterium” with Laudate Deum and with the “Amazonian and synodal church.”

Nemo propheta in sua patria. But if today some priests surrender to the evidence and ask Catholic journalists to tell the truth about the adverse effects, I wonder with what serenity they have so far silenced their conscience, and if their silence and fearful silence – like that of the doctors, police forces, magistrates, teachers and governors – has not turned into a timid protest today just because they see the showdown approaching and fear for their own reputation more than for the health of the billions of people subjected to the inoculation of a product that was known from the beginning to be dangerous and even lethal.

Their silence on the pandemic fraud is identical to that on the apostasy of the Catholic Hierarchy. And the moral responsibility that weighs on them will remain as an indelible stain for which they will have to answer to God, to men, and to History.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/archbishop...od/5837814

The Globalist Shadow Cult Exposed by Archbishop Viganò, Dr. Mercola & AllNewsPipeline
By Allan J. Feifer, Archbishop Viganò, Rob Pue, Dr. Joseph Mercola and Philip Crossing

The Cult That Rules Over America And The World, Operating In The Shadows, Is Tightening The Nooses Around Our Necks - Their Fantasy Has Become Reality All Across Europe And We're Next
By Allan J. Feifer and All News Pipeline
October 15, 2023

What could be the single overriding thread superseding all others, tying all narratives together?

It is that we face a ruling cult with no moral rudder and no identifiable corporate or organizational hierarchy, and that allows it to operate in the shadows. This cult exists to accumulate power and destroy its enemies.

So why do we call them a cult and not a conspiracy? What are the symbiotic relationships they constantly groom? What is the one thing they can't allow you to possess? And how can we can fight them and win?

The Cult of Our Betters (COOB) is a loosely organized group of individuals, companies, governments, and others who have adopted common objectives that grant the participants immense power and control over much of the free world. And, while tightening the noose, the collective learns from its mistakes but eases off when there is broad non-compliance. Additionally, the collective elicits the help of our most malleable citizens, giving them muscle to scare us as they keep us occupied while the collective goes about their stratagem of control. They have a feedback loop in the mainstream media.

There are no secret handshakes required. There are no banks of supercomputers located under some bunker, or Star Chamber needed to destroy Western Civilization. The cult openly convenes frequent one-on-one meetings in places like Davos to establish common actionable tactics and objectives by groups like the World Economic Forum (WEF). That group sponsors and summons select invitees each year. There are many other opportunities for the 'In' crowd to determine how you will be allowed to live. Why is this difficult to believe? Read this link and see what our future looks like. This fantasy is becoming reality all over Europe; we're next.

https://www.weforum.org/

https://www.euronews.com/green/2023/04/2...he-climate

The continued success of this cult, which is a progressive cult, requires never-ending indoctrination on subjects like 'sustainability' (code for the climate change agenda), 'shared' governance, and an end to conflict. This is to be achieved through pacification of the masses, controlling their ability to exist as independent, free-thinking citizens.

Our freedoms began eroding decades ago as we allowed our leaders to bargain away our economy, sovereignty, individual rights, and more. Not a whit of this could have happened without the media's complicity and the death of investigative journalism. My conservative friends will point out the duplicity of both parties as they enjoy the benefits of collaboration with the enemy. No good end will come to them as, in the end, they too will be consumed by the whirlwind, probably first!

The Cult of Our Betters is not a conspiracy in the classic sense because there is no central bad guy. The conspirators support each other, but mainly at the philosophical level. Over time and with more divisions exploited in individual countries, you will witness groups of countries begin to coalesce into larger mega-countries. Look at the European Union as an example of where national governments are redundant.

Given enough time, commonality of cult interests will overpower national pride, as has happened within the EU. The European Union is the model many malign players look at when gaming out world domination. It's obvious to some now that wars of domination, like in Ukraine, can't be replicated worldwide. There is no assurance of victory, as Russia has discovered, and the political reality of brutal old-style war creates unreliable alliances. The uncertainty can be overwhelming.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union

The most closely held freedom to destroy is your privacy. That threatens them. They know and understand that they cannot succeed without knowing your innermost secrets. If control is desired, there must be perfect knowledge about those you wish to enslave. Individual privacy is a dagger to the heart of COOB. To that end, governments allow and partner with large tech companies to collect and monetize data on their subscribers.

How many understand that virtually all the big mega-media companies read all your mail and rob you of your privacy, even mining your contacts simultaneously? That allows them to create individually accessible data points defining your life in over two hundred searchable metrics, which can be bought for the right price or used to support secret government FISA Court warrants. It can also be for an international warrant, a Justice Department warrant, or even your local prosecutor.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2...you-switch
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta...ance_Court

Remember, your information is commercial property for sale to any number of companies and groups, and your control or ability to opt out is limited in practice. Sometimes, it is given to third parties to further this or that cause, as Facebook did in the last presidential election when Mark Zuckerberg spent $400 million to help defeat Trump.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/12/the...uckerberg/
https://nypost.com/2021/10/14/zuckerberg...2020-vote/

People fall into one of two camps:

- They believe the government is trustworthy and positively impacts their life

- They believe the government is untrustworthy and, consequently, exists for its own purposes

I'm from Camp B.

If you believe as I do, then you are left with limited choices for vital communications. No one can fight the government alone. Fighting the government means everything from passive to active resistance. The surveillance state exists on a multitude of public and private plains, and they have very sharp teeth.

The right to free speech is explicit in the Constitution. Regardless of whether we indulge in questionable facts, over-the-top references to violence, or even discuss whether our government is legitimate, all such topics are protected speech. Anyone who tells you otherwise is wrong. This is especially true as we speak to each other privately. Free speech becomes questionable when it translates into actual action or near-term threats. That's Constitutional Law 101.

While there is no constitutional guarantee of privacy, there are several fundamental protections that the government frequently ignores. The Bill of Rights implies privacy in the Constitution, including freedom from unreasonable searches. The Ninth Amendment is the most interesting: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." That pretty much says it all!

https://constitutionus.com/constitution/...stitution/

Privacy is a central theme for me. You can't have freedom without being free in your thoughts, opinions, and associations.

Do we want to be led by those who consider themselves our betters? You choose.

God Bless America.

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/The_Cult..._World.php

Archbishop Viganò: Fight back against the Satanic globalist elite holding the US hostage
October 17, 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akouE6daI54

In this spiritual battle, the globalist elite, however powerful it may seem, obeys Satan – the Adversary, the one who is a murderer from the beginning – while We the People, with all our weaknesses, are aligned with the Almighty God.

Dear friends,

Praised be Jesus Christ!

Allow me to address you first of all to thank you for the witness you are giving to your fellow Americans. The awakening of consciences is the first step towards liberation from the subversive leadership that has usurped the highest places in both national and international institutions. Because opening one’s eyes and looking at reality is essential if you are to understand what is really happening, denounce the globalist coup d’état, and regain the national sovereignty and fundamental freedoms that have been taken away from you.

You have all witnessed, in recent years, a radical change in society. A change planned by people without any electoral mandate and imposed by sold-out rulers. The United States of America, like many other nations hostage to the Agenda 2030, is facing a very serious crisis: inflation, an out of control, self-induced migration crisis, human trafficking and child trafficking, rampant crime and the weakening of law enforcement, the liberalization of crime and impunity, social degradation everywhere, new drugs that ruin the people who take them, the aberrations of woke ideology, the LGBTQ+ agenda imposed in schools, discrimination against Whites. And there is still more: the war against President Donald Trump, the electoral fraud in the presidential election, the Great Reset plans that seem to be proceeding smoothly, and the bottomless pit of funding and military aid that seeks to prolong the conflict in Ukraine, thereby covering up the crimes of the Biden family and the Democrats. And finally, a very disturbing new scenario of war in the Middle East. This multi-pronged siege has all the hallmarks of an unconventional war that is far more devastating than an armed conflict.

This elite wants us to believe that the changes they are imposing on us without any democratic legitimacy are for our good. This seemingly inexorable process has been planned for decades, and those who have desired it and are implementing it belong to openly anti-Christian and antichristic lobbies. Divorce, abortion, euthanasia, “gender transition,” pedophilia, moral corruption, “cancel culture,” immigration and manipulated crises, a way to eradicate every trace of Christian morality from our societies and to deliberately create the impoverishment of the population and favor civil war. Their purpose is to divide us, make us enemies of each other, and see us fighting against each other instead of uniting and fighting them. And ultimately, all this chaos serves as a pretext to suppress protests with new restrictions. These subversives want at all costs to make us think that there is no alternative, that the crises they provoke – the pandemic farce, the climate emergency, the energy and water crisis, the proxy wars – are irreversible and inevitable.

Today, we know that it is not so. We have the ability to escape from this hell on earth – and we must – but we can do it only if we understand two important and interconnected things.

First: the globalists are certainly very well organized and have enormous economic means, but they are very few, and the members of this tyrannical elite have a name and a face, starting with the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, with Bill Gates, George Soros, and Klaus Schwab. All their wealth and profits derive from the exploitation of the peoples and the complicity of the rulers who have been corrupted and bought out. Here too the names are well known: many politicians and representatives of the leading institutions in various nations have participated in the “Young Global Leaders for Tomorrow” program, the school of subversion, run by the World Economic Forum. How are the exponents of supranational organizations whose purpose is their own enrichment and our enslavement different from the mafia? What prevents us from rebelling against them in the same way that we would rebel against mafia leaders?

The second important thing to keep in mind is that, in this spiritual battle, the globalist elite, however powerful it may seem, obeys Satan, the Adversary, the one who is a murderer from the beginning, while We the People, with all our weaknesses, are aligned with the Almighty God. Do we believe that their master, Satan, is more powerful than the Lord God? Our Lord Jesus Christ, the Only Begotten Son of God, became incarnate and faced his Passion and Death on the Cross precisely in order to break the chains of sin and death with which Satan holds us captive. By the Redemption, we have been ransomed from the yoke of the devil, and through Grace, we have supernatural assistance in fighting the holy battle against the Adversary of mankind. If we understand that victory has already been won and that God is truly Almighty, we also understand that if we side with the Lord and fight with Him against His and our enemies, we will share in the victory. The question is not “whether” God will win over Satan – His victory is certain because Satan has already been conquered on the Cross. The question is whether we want to win with God or inexorably lose with Satan.

It is God, Almighty God, who holds the destiny of the world in his hands. He is the Lord, the Giver of Life. We must obey Him and Him alone, because He is a good Father who wants our good, to the point of giving the life of His Only Begotten Son for us! We must believe only in God, because He is the Truth and He does not deceive us!

Come forth, in the name of God! Come forth from this horrendous infernal theater set up by subversive criminals who want us dead! Do not allow the deception of this house of horrors to become a dystopian reality. Do not let yourselves be killed in body and soul by those who hate all that is Good, True, and Beautiful because it is an image of God and His greatness! React and get up!

Wake up, dear friends. Wake up from your slumber and rediscover the pride of serving the Good, knowing that God is at your side and that, however powerful His and our enemies may seem, He has already won, but He wants us all to participate in this spiritual battle in order to make us sharers in His victory and triumph.

And if, in this battle, you also want to help the priests and religious who courageously resist the tyranny of a corrupt and apostate Catholic hierarchy, you can do so with a donation to Exsurge Domine, the international association founded by me that helps pastors faithful to Christ and fights so that the Word of God is not silenced, so that the light of the Gospel shines in the darkness, so that there may always be priests who offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass to the Divine Majesty. May the Blessed Virgin Mary, Our Lady and Queen, and Saint Michael the Archangel, the Prince of the Heavenly Host, help us in this endeavor.

Do not be deceived, dear friends: Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus imperat!

And may God bless you all.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop
Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America

    Catholic ChurchFreedomGlobalismPolitics - U.S. AbortionAgenda 2030AmericaArchbishop Carlo Maria Viganòbiden familyBill GatesCancel CultureCarlo Maria ViganòChild TraffickingChristian MoralityClimate Changeclimate ideologyDemocratsDivorceEuthanasiaGender TransitionGeorge SorosGlobalist eliteGlobalistsGreat ResetHuman TraffickingJesus ChristKlaus Schwablgbtq agendaMiddle EastMigration Crisismoral corruptionPedophiliaPoliticsPresident Donald Trumprampant crimeReawaken America TourRockefellersRothschildsspiritual battleUkraineUnited StatesUnited States Of AmericaUsUsaWokeWoke Ideology

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/vig...ist-elite/

With Non-Stop World-Wide Chaos, It Won't Be Long Before America Is Taken Over And Destroyed By Foreign Military Forces Already Here And We'll Be Living A Real Life 'Red Dawn'
By Rob Pue of Wisconsin Christian News for All News Pipeline
October 17, 2023

Many have asked me what my thoughts are on the “surprise” attack on Israel by Hamas on October 7. Thousands of missiles began raining down on indiscriminate targets in Israel just before dawn that day. At the same time, hundreds of armed fighters descended on Israel — using motorboats, paragliders and motorcycles. Bulldozers also breached border fences between Gaza and Israel.

It was truly a scene of “shock and awe” as militants marched through the streets, burst into homes and began shooting residents. Others, including women, children and the elderly were taken hostage. Hamas is threatening to kill the hostages one by one and film the executions.

As of October 16, the official death toll was at more than 1,400 and at least another 3,400 were injured in Israel. At least thirty Americans were killed and an undetermined number of Americans were taken hostage.

Israel began to take immediate retaliatory action, and in Gaza, at least 2,750 people are dead, with at least 10,000 wounded so far. Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed that Israel will “demolish” Hamas. Nearly a half million Israel Defense Force soldiers have been mobilized for a ground offensive in Gaza.

A little history here: Hamas was formed in 1987 at the start of the first Palestinian uprising against Israel and is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, made up of Sunni Muslims from multiple countries. Their goal is to create a Palestinian state and Hamas refuses to recognize any “peace deal” with Israel. They’re funded by Islamic countries, including Iran, which, as we all know, has been and is well-funded by the United States. Remember the pallets of cash Barack Hussein Obama gave to Iran? In 2016, we sent Iran thirteen separate payments of $100 million — and an additional $400 million was sent by cash.

In 2016 alone, the US, under the direction of Obama, sent $1.7 Billion dollars to Iran. This figure was not disputed by the Obama administration. If you think the US is no longer an Iranian “cash cow” you’d be mistaken. We continue to fund our enemies. How does it feel knowing that nearly half your paycheck goes directly to federal taxes, and is then sent to our enemies, used to support illegal invaders on US soil, and also sent to places like Ukraine, where the money is “laundered” and returned back into the pockets of the so-called “lawmakers” (our “public servants”) who sent it there in the first place? In case you missed it, the Pentagon just recently announced yet another $200 million in never-ending “aid” for Ukraine.

And if you wondered where all the military equipment Biden left for our enemies in Afghanistan ended up... recent events should give you a good idea.

Today, it seems that war is everywhere. In addition to the wars in Israel and Ukraine, China has its eyes on the world as well. Then there’s North Korea, the rest of the middle east, and multiple South American countries. And I hope you don’t think all this war is going to remain “over there,” somewhere, because it’s already here as well.

After years of our borders being wide open, complete with the red carpet treatment for illegals invading our nation, we now have multiple major crises all around the United States. On October 11, the mayor of New York City sent out a stern warning regarding possible “lone wolf” attacks, while simultaneously, thousands of Muslims — also illegal aliens, invited in, flown here, settled and well fed by the Regime in the White House — were celebrating the killing of Jews in Times Square and calling for Jihad in the US.

We’ve also seen record numbers of Chinese nationals coming in over our southern border in recent years — mostly all single, military-age men. Once here, they settle in at the location of their choice, and like other illegal so-called “immigrants,” are treated to “free everything,” from healthcare to food and housing. We’re also surrounded by Chinese military encampments and training grounds, operating openly on our northern border in Canada and our southern border in Mexico. Not to mention those operating in semi-secrecy right here on American soil. In those cases, these military training camps are operating under the protection of the American government.

So it’s not a matter of if war is going to come to the streets of the United States, or to our own doors. It’s just a matter of when. And with another presidential so-called “election” coming up in ‘24, it doesn’t take a brain surgeon to figure out it’s coming by this time next year. In fact, I believe by this time next year, disastrous attacks and chaos will be so intense in this country, it will be unlike anything we could possibly imagine now.

Our “leaders” have openly aided and abetted virtually every hostile enemy of the United States for countless years now. Hard working Americans obediently pay their taxes and subsist paycheck-to-paycheck to do so, and all that tax money goes directly to our enemies and those who wish to kill us. But the tax money ran out long ago. Now they’re simply printing more fiat currency and handing it over, which is also working to destroy our once-great nation, with hyper-inflation.

It’s all been done deliberately. We see the victims of war in other countries, and we mourn for the innocent citizens there. But under the current Regime in power in the US, our country has become so evil and wicked, I wonder if anyone will mourn for us when the destruction of our cities — now already well underway — is complete, and our country is occupied by foreign military forces.

Friends, this has nothing to do with “Democrat” or “Republican.” Yes, the Democratic party is more evil than we know, but so is the Republican party — and our “good, conservative” Republicans have done absolutely nothing of any significance to stand against the evil. On the contrary, most of them are complicit in it.

But getting back to the attack on Israel. I have some questions, as I always do, with the “official narrative” that’s pushed by the mainstream media. First, why were Israeli defense forces ordered to stand down for seven hours during the attack, in spite of thousands of calls for help? The television network Al Jazeera aired live stream operations of the attack, but the IDF supposedly remained oblivious, for hours.

And in one of the most volatile places in the world, Hamas paratroopers parachuted into Israeli towns in broad daylight, completely unchallenged, until it was too late. How could that be? Israel has, arguably, the most advanced technology to detect and stop such an attack, but it was not implemented or utilized. Even the missile-stopping “Iron Dome” system suddenly failed to work.

These are just a few of the questions I have, but I think they bear investigating. It’s much like the situation we saw in August when the Globalists burned down the town of Lahaina on Maui, Hawaii. No warnings, despite Lahaina having the most technologically-advanced early warning system in the world. No electricity. Water to fight the fires was turned off. Police deliberately blocked roads to assure people would die in the inferno. The governor of Hawaii, who has long been on board with the Great Reset Agenda, has spoken about a “sustainable SMART city” in Hawaii — at the UN and World Economic forum — multiple times, and just weeks before the fire, signed a declaration making it easier for the government to seize land and “build back better” in the way the government sees fit.

Then look at all the train derailments here in America. Look at all the food processing facilities that have burned to the ground in the last couple of years — amazing that not one of those facilities had an operational sprinkler system or fire mitigation system in place. Look at foreign nationals planting flags of their native countries on American soil. Look at the private money involved. Look at all this stuff, and the best word I can come up with to describe it is “CHAOS.”

The Globalist rulers of this world have now reached a point where we’re literally going from one crisis of Biblical proportions to another without even giving us a chance to catch our breath. They’ve achieved non-stop, world-wide chaos, and I don’t see any “white hats” coming to save us.

The destruction we’re seeing today in Israel is coming soon to our own country. Sleeper cells are already in place, settled in quite comfortably, mind you, in places formerly occupied by elderly veterans and former home-owners who’ve lost everything due to “Bidenomics.” They’re just waiting for the signal to launch the “hot” war — and don’t be deceived into thinking they’re not prepared. They’re far more prepared than our own now-“woke” military is.

Yes, Americans have guns. There are still plenty of patriots and hunters and “good guys” with guns. If you’re not one of them, I’d suggest you start making friends. You’re going to need them. I only learned recently that citizen militias are actually ILLEGAL in all 50 states. Did you know that? So yes, the second amendment guarantees our right to keep and bear arms, but it’s illegal for us to do so in any kind of organized way.

Something very, very bad is coming to our doors, and I don’t see how the regime cannot insist that it begins sometime before this time next year. As censorship of the truth continues to grow, as innocent Americans continue to be persecuted and jailed for crimes they didn’t commit, as the flood of enemies continues to pour in over our borders — all paid for and financed by each one of us obedient taxpayers, and as the wicked politicians and communists continue to ramp up the speed with which they’re lining their own pockets with dirty money...blood money, I can see that time is quickly running out for the United States of America.

Sorry to be the one to give you the bad news. But all this has been well planned for a very long time. Recent surveys now show that even self-identifying “liberals” feel the country is headed dangerously in the wrong direction. Such ones are living in fear of what the future holds, even as they double-down on their Leftist ideologies; they’re so brainwashed they can no longer reason or think. Their foolish hearts are darkened. They’ve been given over to reprobate minds, as they continue to choose to believe the lies. And so they fear.

I fear too. For my children and grandchildren. So precious. I’m sure there are many parents and grandparents around the world, in war-torn countries, who feel the same. So friends, don’t think it can’t happen here. It’s already here. All it’s going to take is for the signal to go out on all those free cell phones the illegals have been given and then we’ll be living a real-life “Red Dawn.” It’s not going to go well for us. But so many chose to do nothing while there was still time. So many chose to ignore obvious truth when it was presented to them, and instead called it all “crazy conspiracy theories.”

The world rulers are orchestrating non-stop chaos. And America is not “untouchable.” America is the primary target now. But our Creator is not a God of chaos, but of order. I believe He’s returning soon, and will crush “chaos” under His feet. Meanwhile, we’ve been commanded to occupy until He returns, being a restraining influence against evil. We must speak the truth, even when no one wants to listen. We must never give up our quest for the truth and never stop being righteous witnesses for Christ. Remember, only he who stands firm ‘til the end shall be saved.

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/American...d_Dawn.php

The Rise of the Global Police State
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
October 18, 2023

At this point in time, it’s crucial to realize that the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are part of the plan to implement a One World Government, where the entire world will be run by unelected bureaucrats beholden to technocratic ideals.

https://takecontrol.substack.com/p/patri...echnocracy

In a two-part Unlimited Hangout investigative series,1,2 independent journalists Iain Davis and Whitney Webb expose how Sustainable Development Goal No. 16 (SDG16), which claims to advance “peaceful and inclusive societies” and “justice for all,” is really about consolidating authority, exploiting threats to advance regime hegemony, and forcing a “centrally controlled global system of digital identity3 (digital ID) upon humanity.”

As explained in Part 1,4 the term the globalist alliance of technocrats use to describe its network is a “global public-private partnership,” or G3P:

“The G3P is toiling tirelessly to create the conditions necessary to justify the imposition of both global governance ‘with teeth’ and its prerequisite digital ID system. In doing so, the G3P is inverting the nature of our rights. It manufactures and exploits crises in order to claim legitimacy for its offered ‘solutions.’

The G3P comprises virtually all of the world’s intergovernmental organizations, governments, global corporations, major philanthropic foundations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and civil society groups. Collectively, these form the ‘stakeholders’ implementing sustainable development, including SDG16.”

The following chart, sourced from IanDavis.com,5 illustrates how the G3P operates.

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/pu...er/g3p.jpg

What SDG16 Is Really About

The central objective of SDG16 is to strengthen the UN-led regime, and of all the subgoals included in this SDG, the establishment of “a legal identity for all” (SDG16.9), is the most crucial, as other goals rely on the use of digital identity. As noted by Davis and Webb:6

“Universal adoption of SDG16.9 digital ID will enable the G3P global governance regime’s to establish a worldwide system of reward and punishment. If we accept the planned model of digital ID, it will ultimately enslave us in the name of sustainable development …

SDG16.9 ‘sustainable development’ means we must use digital ID … Otherwise we will not be protected in law, service access will be denied, our right to transact in the modern economy will be removed, we will be barred from participating as ‘citizens’ and excluded from so-called ‘democracy.’”

Understanding Digital Identity

The World Economic Forum (WEF), founded by Schwab, has for years promoted the implementation of digital identity. The problem with calling it “digital ID” is that people misunderstand it to be something it’s not. There’s a huge difference between identity and identification.7

Identification refers to documents that prove you are who you say you are. A digital identity is NOT merely a form of identification. Your “identity” is who you actually are, and a digital identity will keep a permanent record of your choices and behaviors, 24/7.

Your identity encompasses everything that makes you unique, and that’s what the globalist cabal is really after. Step out of line, and every social media interaction, every penny spent and every move you’ve ever made can be used against you.

Indeed, having access to everyone’s digital identity is the key to successful manipulation and control of the global population. The graphic below, from the WEF, illustrates their idea of how your digital identity will interact with the world.

Everything you can think of is to be connected to your digital identity, and your behavior, beliefs and opinions will dictate what you can and cannot do within society. It will unlock doors where someone like you is welcome, and lock the ones where you’re not.

If you think the idea of vaccine passports is insane, wait until your access to critical infrastructure and services is dependent not just on your vaccination status, but also what books you’ve bought, what ideas you’ve shared, and who you’ve given money or emotional support to.

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/pu...ty-img.jpg

Interoperability Will Link Disparate Systems Together

As people are coming to understand the threat of a One World Government, resistance against digital ID and the social credit score that comes with it has started to mount. The G3P’s answer to that dilemma is the construction of an interoperable system that can link disparate digital ID systems together. As explained by Davis and Webb:8

“This ‘modular platform’ approach is designed to avoid the political problems that the official issuance of a national digital ID card would otherwise elicit.

Establishing SDG16.9 global digital ID is crucial for 8 of the 17 UN SDGs. It is the linchpin at the center of a global digital panopticon that is being devised under the auspices of the UN’s global public-private partnership ‘regime.’”

You Have No Rights, Only Permits, Under the New World Order

You may be wondering where human rights enter into all of this. If your digital ID records every move you make, which can then be used against you, won’t that violate some of your basic rights as a free human being? Well, that depends on how human rights are defined — and who defines them. Davis and Webb explain:9

“… the Universal Declaration of Human Rights … was first accepted by all members of the United Nations on December 10, 1948. The preamble of the Declaration recognizes that the ‘equal and inalienable rights’ of all human beings are the ‘foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.’

After that, ‘inalienable rights’ are never again mentioned in the entire Declaration. ‘Human rights’ are nothing like ‘inalienable rights.’

Inalienable rights, unlike human rights, are not bestowed upon us by any governing authority. Rather, they are innate to each of us. They are immutable. They are ours in equal measure. The only source of inalienable rights is Natural Law, or God’s Law.

No one — no government, no intergovernmental organization, no human institution or human ruler — can ever legitimately claim the right to grant or deny our inalienable rights. Humanity can claim no collective authority to grant or deny the inalienable rights of any individual human being.

Beyond the preamble, the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) concerns itself exclusively with ‘human rights.’ But asserting, as it does, that human rights are some sort of expression of inalienable rights is a fabrication — a lie.

Human rights, according to the UDHR, are created by certain human beings and are bestowed by those human beings upon other human beings. They are not inalienable rights or anything close to inalienable rights.

Article 6 of the UDHR and Article 16 of the UN’s 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights … both decree: ‘Everyone has the [human] right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.’

Note: We put ‘[human]’ in brackets … to alert readers that these documents are NOT referring to inalienable rights. While the respective Articles 6 and 16 sound appealing, the underlying implications are not.

Both articles mean that ‘without legal existence those rights may not be asserted by a person within the domestic legal order.’ As we shall see, the ability to prove one’s identity will become a prerequisite for ‘legal existence.’ Thus, in a post-SDG16 world, persons without UN-approved identification will be unable to assert their ‘human rights’ …

Article 29.3 of the UDHR states: ‘These [human] rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.’

In plain English: We are only allowed to exercise our alleged human ‘rights’ subject to the diktats of governments, intergovernmental organizations and other UN ‘stakeholders.’ The bottom line, then, is that what the UN calls ‘human rights’ are … government and intergovernmental permits by which our behavior is controlled.”

COVID Was an Opportunity to Reset the Playing Field

Our behavior is also controlled through censorship and control of information. In its “COVID-19 and Human Rights” document,10 published in April 2020, the UN presents human rights as policy tools and openly admits that “securing compliance” with health measures that severely restrict (or outright eliminate) human rights will depend on “building trust,” and that includes censoring that which might undermine trust in authorities.

Censorship of “misinformation” and “disinformation” is also required under the proposed International Treaty on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response, which places the World Health Organization at the center of all pandemic-related agendas, and in the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHRs). Importantly, both of these instruments will be binding. As noted by Davis and Webb:11

“The current proposed amendments12 to the IHR illustrate how ‘crises’ provide unique opportunities for the UN and its partners to control populations — through purported ‘human rights’ — by exploiting those ‘rights’ as ‘a powerful set of tools.’

Here is one example of the proposals being put forth: The WHO wishes to remove the following language from IHR Article 3.1: ‘The implementation of these Regulations shall be with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons.’

It intends to replace that regulatory principle with: ‘The implementation of these Regulations shall be based on the principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with the common but differentiated responsibilities of their States Parties, taking into consideration their social and economic development.’

This proposed amendment signifies that the UN and its partners wish to completely ignore the UN’s own Universal Declaration of Human Rights whenever any of these agencies declares a new ‘crisis’ or identifies a new ‘international threat.’ This exemplifies the ‘course-correction’ the UN envisioned would arise from the ‘unique opportunity’ presented by the COVID-19 crisis.”

The UN Has Already Assumed Authority; No One Granted It

Right now, the WHO appears to be set up to become the de facto global government, but the UN is also a contender, and it has openly assumed this authority.

For example, in its “UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda” document,13 published in 2013, it states that “A global governance regime, under the auspices of the UN, will have to ensure that the global commons will be preserved for future generations.”
The United Nation’s Charter establishes a global governance regime that stands against freedom, justice and peace, and all of the UN’s SDGs need to be understood within this context.

As noted by Davis and Webb:14

“The UN calls itself a ‘global governance regime.’ It is arbitrarily assuming the authority to seize control of everything (‘the global commons’), including humans, both by enforcing its Charter — citing its misnamed ‘Human Rights’ declaration — and by fulfilling its ‘Sustainable Development’ agenda.

Note that the ‘global governance regime’ will ultimately ‘translate into better national and regional governance.’ This means that the role of each national government is merely to ‘translate’ global governance into national policy. Electing one political party or another to undertake the translation makes no material difference. The policy is not set by the governments we elect.

As nation-states one by one implement SDG-based policies, the regime further consolidates its global governance. And since the ‘global governance regime will be critical to achieve sustainable development,’ the two mechanisms — global governance and sustainable development — are symbiotic.

Again, by the UN’s own admission, inalienable rights are the ‘foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.’ Yet the UN’s entire Charter-based human rights framework comprehensively rejects the principle of inalienable and immutable rights.

The UN Charter is, therefore, an international treaty that establishes a global governance regime which stands firmly against ‘freedom, justice and peace in the world.’ All of the UN’s ‘sustainable development’ projects should be understood in this context …

You may wonder what Sustainable Development Goal 16 … has to do with protecting the planet and its inhabitants from the predicted ‘climate disaster.’ The answer is: nothing at all. But then, ‘climate change’ is merely the proffered rationale that purportedly legitimizes and lends urgency to sustainable development.

Establishing firm global governance — in effect, a world dictatorship — through the implementation of SDGs is the United Nations’ real objective. ‘Climate change’ is just the excuse.”

‘One Health’ — The Global Takeover of Everything

The pandemic treaty and IHR amendments, once enacted, will form the foundation for the WHO’s legal authority to act as a global governing body. Both are broadly focused on pandemic preparedness, planning and response, but there are built in loopholes that can easily be invoked by the WHO to turn it into a de facto global dictatorship.

The central instrument that will allow for the vast expansion of the WHO’s power is something called the One Health Joint Plan of Action, officially launched in October 2022 by the WHO, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH).

This initiative amounts to multiple globalist organizations synchronizing their plans, while at the same time combining their resources and power.

The “One Health”15,16 agenda recognizes that a broad range of human and environmental aspects can impact health and therefore fall under the “potential” to cause harm. For example, this is how the WHO will be able to declare climate change as a health emergency and subsequently require climate lockdowns.

The graphic17 below illustrates how the WHO’s scope of control is expanded under the One Health agenda to cover vast aspects of everyday life.

https://lrc-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/assets/...20x601.jpg

On paper, the One Health Joint Plan of Action “seeks to improve the health of humans, animals, plants and the environment, while contributing to sustainable development.”18 Its five-year plan, which spans 2022 to 2026, intends to expand capacities in six key areas, including health care systems, the environment and food safety.

https://takecontrol.substack.com/p/who-o...-of-action

The plan includes a technical document that covers a set of actions intended to advance One Health at global, regional and national levels. As reported by the WHO:19

“These actions notably include the development of an upcoming implementation guidance for countries, international partners, and non-state actors such as civil society organizations, professional associations, academia and research institutions.”

In other words, the goal is to create health, environmental and food safety rules to be followed on a global scale.

The Endgame and How to Stop It

In an April 16, 2023, Substack article,20 Jessica Rose, a postdoctoral researcher in biology, tried to make sense of the last three years. Starting at the end, she believes the endgame is the “conversion of the majority of human beings into workers … like ants.”

To get there, the globalists must dehumanize us, systematically chip away at the human spirit, render us infertile and destroy all notions of bodily autonomy and national sovereignty. The plan has worked well so far, but cracks are beginning to show. More and more people are starting to put the puzzle pieces together, as Rose attempts to do in her article.

The COVID pandemic was the set-up, Rose suggests. It was geared to “test compliance levels” and set the scene for the next act, which was to normalize all things abnormal. The trans movement, which completely overwhelmed the social consciousness in a single year, is a continuation and expansion of that “normalization of the abnormal” phase.

It’s also a major component of the agenda to dehumanize and sterilize the population. After all, trans youth — who are also among the most brainwashed individuals in society right now — are the future of humanity. A brand-new report by legal experts backed by the United Nations is also seeking to normalize pedophilia,21 which would further dehumanize and de-spirit our youth for generations to come.

Adding insult to injury, the report was published March 8, 2023, “in recognition” of International Women’s Day. Never mind the fact that young girls and women are the primary victims of this sick mindset.

The “manmade climate change” hysteria and subsequent war on carbon is another fabricated “emergency” that is unhinged from science and reality. And the UN’s SDGs are perfectly tailored to enable the endgame. Under these goals, human freedom, human health and quality of life are sacrificed to “protect the environment and save the planet.”

As Rose notes, if the WHO pandemic treaty goes through, we can expect to be locked down indefinitely under the guise of “some climate catastrophe, likely linked to some ‘deadly pathogen’ passed to humans via some insect vector like mosquitoes.”

By then, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) will also be in place, which will enable the unelected totalitarian regime to enforce whatever restrictions the WHO and its funders dream up, be it related to the food you’re allowed to eat based on your carbon footprint, the drugs you’re forced to take, what causes you’re allowed to fund, what businesses you’re allowed to buy from, when and how far you’re allowed to travel or anything else.

“A practical way I can think of to stop the endgame from being realized is to stop the CBDC,” Rose writes. “Use cash. Insist upon it. Do not give business to stores that only use cashless systems. Supply equals demand, so demand the use of CASH.”

Other Strategies to Reclaim Our Freedoms

Other ways to prevent the WHO’s power grab, include the following:

• Call your congressman or congresswoman and urge them to sponsor H.R.79 — The WHO Withdrawal Act,22 introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs, which calls for defunding and exiting the WHO. The Sovereignty Coalition’s Help the House Defund the WHO page will allow you to contact all of your elected representatives with just a few clicks.

Simply fill out the required field, click submit, and your contact information will be used to match you with your elected representatives.

• Also urge your congressman or congresswoman to sponsor H.R.1425,23 which would require the pandemic treaty to be approved by the Senate.

• Call your senators and urge them to sponsor the Senate version of H.R.1425, which is S.444, the No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act.24

• Share Door To Freedom’s educational poster,25 which explains how the IHR amendments will destroy national sovereignty, and increase surveillance and censorship. See doortofreedom.org for more information.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/10/jose...ice-state/

The Globalists Are At War With God As They Transform 'People' Into A Pool Of 'Nobody-Nothingness,' Where Death, Destruction And The Collapse Of Humanity Are Their Biggest Goals
By Philip Crossing and All News Pipeline
October 18, 2023

The world is in upheaval as the old cultures that built modern civilization succumb to socialism. Nobody knows where it will take us as we watch helplessly the implosion of our Anglo-centric structures.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles...s_yet.html

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles...times.html

The plain-sight goal of hegemonic progressives is to collectivize property and people into a global pool of nobody-nothingness, while middle-class private ownership (responsible self-sufficiency) and the existence of meaningful persons shrink toward zero.

Socialism is often mistakenly reduced to an economic construct, or to one of its scientific sub-theories such as Marxism or communism. However, in its essence, it is a spiritual condition with a structural narrative that can be summarized as follows:

A chosen people are called to destroy the old world and liberate society from its cultural captivity, ushering in a new Golden Age.

This is achieved through the abolition of private property and family, hostility toward religion, and a general push for commonality or “sameness,” which is mischaracterized as “equality.”

The underlying motivation behind socialism is a loss of faith in a person’s intrinsic worth and a bitter spiritual craving for its destruction and death. It is an inevitable result of a humanist-existentialist view of human origins and existence.

The modernist worldview embraced by the West over the past couple of centuries has rejected the supernatural Christian God in favor of an immanent, rationalist, man-centered or “humanist” version of reality. This has resulted in a philosophical collapse due to the insoluble tension between the “One” and the “Many.” Within this worldview, the person cannot be both individual and communal at the same time and subsequently becomes an irrelevant and meaningless “concept.”

The meaningless individual draws power and authority toward itself at the expense of the collective. The meaningless collective welcomes authoritarianism as the source of ultimacy, at the expense of the individual.

Power is then concentrated into the hands of ever fewer individuals, who direct authoritarian control over a meaningless human collective.

Perhaps because he spent his life within the stranglehold of the USSR, Igor Shafarevich’s thesis on socialism failed to make a religious connection with socialism’s inherent nihilism. However, from a Christian perspective, socialism becomes comprehensible, and even curable.

https://archive.org/details/TheSocialistPhenomenon1980

Socialism as viewed within a Christian context becomes the antithesis of Christianity. To use the word in its broad sense, socialism is a form of anti-Christ.

It is clearly so in an ontological sense, given that Christology is about creation, life, and love of humanity, whereas socialism seeks destruction, death, and the collapse of humanity.

What is even more striking are the eschatological and soteriological parallels between socialism and Christianity. Socialism effectively replaces God’s salvation as the solution to humanity’s problem with ultimate meaning.

Within the Christian axiom, the problem of the meaningless person is resolved by rejecting death and raising humanity to an essential life. God’s chosen one is the key to deliverance through humble sacrifice, leading to the destruction of a rebellious death-culture, so that God can renew creation according to the rules of God. The repentant and faithful will inherit the Earth in this new society.

Within the humanist axiom, the problem of the meaningless person is resolved by rejecting an essential life and reducing humanity to death (equality). Self-chosen humans are the key to deliverance through authoritarianism, leading to the destruction of a despised life-culture, so that humans can create a utopia according to the rules of men. The powerful and faithless will inherit the Earth in this new society.

The Christian alternative to what Shafarevich suggests is an incurable spiritual condition is not just a pleasant counter-story, but is grounded in a unique Trinitarian philosophy that promotes the flourishing of humanity and culture. According to Scripture, the ontological Trinitarian nature of God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit passes into biblical revelation and creation itself. The Gospel according to John is the outstanding example of this Trinitarian total reality. Jesus is the Word through whom the world was created; if you know the Son, you know the Father; if you’ve seen the Son, you’ve seen the Father; Jesus is the Way, the Truth, and the Life.

The One and the Many no longer cancel each other and dissolve. Instead, they exist in a harmonious reality in which the individual remains distinct from the collective, but both are equally and inseparably human. In nature, the parts and the whole, the attributes and the meaning, are harmoniously reliant upon each other and exist within each other, because of their Trinitarian creator. Not only is a supernatural cause necessary to maintain philosophical and logical harmony, but that cause must necessarily be Trinitarian by nature. It is no accident that all Christian heresy stems from a subordination of the persons of the Trinity.

When mankind fell into sin, this perfect symbiosis was broken, and humanity’s vain challenge is to piece it back together. We do this through our families, churches, and social clubs, or as nations. None of this is justifiable from within an existential humanist philosophy, which, while appreciating the virtue of these relationships, inevitably destroys them with more socialism.

Therefore, we see that socialism is the sinful human’s antidote to, firstly, the ontological meaning of Christology; second, to its soteriological praxis in Christ; and finally, to Trinitarian philosophy as the solution to the dialectic of the one and many. It is humanity’s spiritual solution to Christ — a spiritual anti-Christ.

If socialism is merely the futile attempt of sin to replace salvation, and if the Triune God is the only philosophical solution to the disintegrating person, then the cure for the sickness of socialism becomes clear.

For the individual to successfully resist socialism in its current manifestation, the pursuit of Christian anti-socialism is a given. This involves acknowledging the God-created sanctity of all individuals and living accordingly, in vassalage to God and with self-sacrificial love for all men. It also requires a willingness to serve and contribute to the corporate entities in which we find collective meaning. The collective is rooted in God’s church, which brings individuals together in common cause and meaning, as one body.

Although the Western church is being overwhelmed by apathy and socialism, the nature of God is a concept that it gives scant attention. It was the focus of debate for several centuries within the early church, with the issue fully resolved at the Council of Chalcedon in A.D. 456, bringing with it the advent of modern Western civilization.

Chalcedon confirmed the nature of God in the Trinity, and of Jesus as both truly human and truly God, while his two natures remain both distinct and as one. We know from the history of the church upon which our civilization was built, and its socialist antithesis, that to focus on a Trinitarian God is the only way to rebuild a robust and free civilization.

Then Jesus said to those Jews who believed Him, “If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed. And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” John 8:31-32 (NKJV)

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/The_Glob...th_God.php

Lies of Men and Gods - Exposing the Fallen Angel Agenda by Stephen Quayle

As in the Days of Noah... In the twilight of mankind's existence, the War Against God's Creation Rages. Boldface Lies Aggregated deceit and accumulating falsehoods from our governments, our militaries

https://rumble.com/v2vxzm0-lies-of-men-a...ntary.html

https://www.stevequayle.com/imgs/lies-backcover3.jpg

https://www.stevequayle.com/imgs/lies-frontcover2.jpg

Is Putin in Cahoots with the Globalists?
By Riley Waggaman and Mike Whitney
Global Research, October 13, 2023

Mike Whitney (MW): In many parts of the world, Vladimir Putin is admired for his outspoken defense of national sovereignty. But on the domestic front, many of Putin’s policies seem to align with those of the Western globalists. As you note in a recent post at Substack Putin just “signed a decree on the creation of a ‘digital’ domestic passport,” which many people think will pave the way to technocratic tyranny. Am I exaggerating the risks of digital ID here, or does this development pose a serious threat to personal freedom?

Riley Waggaman (RW): Imagine if the United States started issuing digital driver’s licenses that could be used as an official form of ID. What would the reaction be? I suspect a lot of Americans would feel “worried”, for lack of a better term. And not without good reason.

The digital passport system being implemented in Russia is deserving of the same skepticism.

First some context: Russia has a “domestic passport” that basically functions as a national ID. You use your domestic passport to open up a bank account, and for when you have to interact with the local bureaucracy. It’s an important document that you need to do ordinary, everyday things.

The digital passport has been billed as an electronic copy of the domestic passport, accessible via smartphone (via the State Services portal, Gosuslugi). The government is still deciding in what situations/scenarios the digital passport will be accepted as a valid form of ID.

Proponents of this digital document say it’s more convenient than a paper ID, and perhaps they’re right. The problem of course is that modern conveniences can lead to all sorts of unpleasantness, and with time these unpleasant things can even become “normal”.

The fact that this ID will be linked to the State Services portal (Gosuslugi) is certainly cause for concern and it’s easy to imagine how digital passports could be used (and abused) by the Russian government—or any government, for that matter. All in the name of convenience.

Of course, the authorities promise that digital IDs will never be made mandatory. Well, I’m old enough to remember when the Russian government promised that Covid vaccination would be 100% voluntary.

MW: Russia appears to be spearheading the transition to Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) with its creation of the “digital ruble”. In your opinion, what are the potential pitfalls of such a plan?

RW: Excluding the possibility of imposing a full-spectrum digital gulag, the digital ruble has no obvious benefits. I would say the same of all CBDCs, of course.

Some claim that the digital ruble is a very necessary, prudent, and brilliant way to bypass Western sanctions. This is untrue. The Bank of Russia has a fully functional Financial Messaging System (SPFS) that operates independently from SWIFT. Here are a few RT.com headlines for your consideration:

    March 2017: “Russia’s banking system has SWIFT alternative ready”
    February 2018: “Russian banks ready to switch off SWIFT – official”
    October 2019: Russia, China & India to set up alternative to SWIFT payment system to connect 3 billion people”

All of these articles are about SPFS and were published long before the Bank of Russia announced its intention to develop the digital ruble in October 2020.

I’m puzzled as to why so many westerners who claim to understand the dangers of CBDCs think the digital ruble is somehow “different”. The Bank of Russia’s CBDC has been almost unanimously condemned by the country’s most prominent commentators in the alternative/conservative media space. Even mainstream outlets like Tsargrad have published scathing take-downs of the digital ruble.

Meanwhile, in English-language “alternative media”, we are blessed with the profound postulations of deep thinkers like Simplicius who write nipple-hardening purple prose about how amazing and anti-globalist the Bank of Russia is, and why the digital ruble is super hip and cool.

I just don’t understand why English-language commentary (all non-Russian commentary, actually) is so far removed from what patriotic Russians living in Russia are saying about their own country, in Russian.

By the way: The Bank of Russia has already reneged on its promise that it will never, ever “color” digital rubles so that they can only be used to purchase certain items. The central bank’s deputy chairman recently said that placing restrictions on how digital rubles can be spent is a real possibility—and one that will be explored in the future. (link)

The digital ruble hasn’t even entered circulation yet, and the Bank of Russia is already open to “exploring” how this fun new tool of total control—endorsed by Davos, the IMF, the G20,–can be used to curb and stomp on basic human dignity.

MW: Is Russia moving closer to mandatory vaccinations?

Note: Here’s a quote from one of your recent posts:

Russia’s Ministry of Health wants to amend the National Preventive Immunization Calendar so that COVID vaccination could be mandatory for “vulnerable categories of citizens” whenever the country’s benevolent health authorities believe the “epidemiological” situation warrants another round of coercive injections…..

Of course, any new mandatory vaccination decrees would also apply to state employees, including teachers, doctors, military personnel, etc. Edward Slavsquat, Substack

RW: If Russia’s enterprising health ministry—which works tirelessly to safeguard public health—decides that “Covid” is “spreading” at an unacceptable rate, various categories of citizens will have to choose between getting vaxxed or losing their jobs. This is of course still voluntary vaccination because Russians get to choose whether they want to be employed or inject themselves with an unproven genetic goo developed in cooperation with AstraZeneca.

There are many highly intelligent intellectuals—like Aussie Cossack —who continue to pretend that Russia never had mandatory Covid vaccination, which is very brave considering that as of January 2023, there were still hundreds of Russians who were barred from working because they refused to be injected.

The Gamaleya Center continues to “update” its Covid vaccine, and the Russian government continues to shill this dangerous and barely tested trash to children. Whether Covid vaccination will become as ubiquitous and “normal” as the annual flu shot (which is even shoved into the little arms of Russian children every year; I know because I had to sign a document forbidding the kindergarten nurse from injecting my 6-year-old son) is an open question.

But you have to be impressively credulous to believe that the Russian government wants to keep Covid vaccination a purely voluntary affair. Russia’s health bureaucracy has a very poor track record when it comes to calling out Big Pharma/WHO scams. Did you know that you have to get an HIV test (an old school 1980s Fauci scam) to get a work visa in Russia? Well, now you know.

MW: Here’s an excerpt from one of your recent posts that will surprise many readers who think that President Putin actually opposes the Davos crowd and their globalist agenda:

“To defeat globalism, Moscow is reluctantly but responsibly adopting the globalist agenda….

There is no way to stop the technological “progress” promoted by Davos, the G20, the IMF, the World Bank, the UN, and the WHO, which is why Moscow must closely collaborate with all of these globalist organizations in order to maintain globalist parity with the Collective West—otherwise Russia won’t be able to protect herself from the globalists.”

And, here’s more from another post:

“…almost every joint declaration Moscow signs (whether it be a G20 Declaration, a BRICS Declaration, or just some word salad authored with the help of Beijing) includes a passage praising the vital roles of the World Health Organization, the World Trade Organization, and the International Monetary Fund? This seems like relevant information.

The Russian government has repeatedly said it has no intention of withdrawing from the WHO, the WTO, or even the IMF. It would be nice if Cerise could update his article to reflect this undeniable reality. Edward Slavsquat, Substack

You appear to be saying that—even though Russia is fighting the western oligarchy in Ukraine—it is still marching in lockstep with the globalists on matters of social policy. Can you expand on this a bit? And how does Putin fit in with all of this? Is he an unwitting accomplice or an eager participant?

RW: Is Moscow fighting the western oligarchy in Ukraine? Gazprom has been pumping gas across Ukraine since Day 1 of the Special Military Operation (SMO). And that’s not the only natural resource that Russian “entrepreneurs” are desperately transiting through Ukrainian territory.

I have yet to read about a western-backed Ukrainian oligarch having his home vaporized by a Russian missile. Actually, it’s doubtful that a single western oligarch, anywhere, has been inconvenienced by the SMO. On the contrary, it has been a wonderful money-making opportunity—for Russian oligarchs as well.

But to address the second part of your question: Anyone who follows Russian-language media knows that Moscow is in near-total lockstep with the West when it comes to soul-crushing technocracy and other forms “safe and convenient” societal progress. Actually, an objective observer would recognize that Russia is far ahead of the West in implementing “digitalization” shilled by Davos and other celebrated globalist organizations.

Putin has done nothing meaningful to slow this process down. Actually, by allowing glorious patriots like Herman Gref to spearhead AI, biometrics, QR-coded cattle-tagging, facial recognition systems, “sustainable development”, and other trendy tech-development in Russia, Putin is an unapologetic accomplice in all the unsavory madness pestering Russia and every other country.

Seriously, just look at how the Russian government treats schoolchildren(like diseased, suspicious cattle), and you will begin to understand where this country is headed. Children are the future, after all!

MW: Can you summarize your views on the Covid-19 vaccine?

RW: It’s bad.

MW: You say that “Russians are not too keen on Russia’s Central Bank chief Elvira Nabiullina”. According to you: “The socialists, the monarchists, the neo-soviets, the conservatives, the military hardliners—with few exceptions,… all despise Elvira and her digital rubles.”

Later in your article you say: “(Elvira) Nabiullina is a symbol of pursuing an economic policy contrary to Russia’s interests.”

That’s pretty harsh criticism. Can you explain what’s going on? Why would Putin reappoint someone to such an important position who –many feel– is implementing a globalist agenda?

RW: The second quote is actually from Nakanune.ru, which is a left-leaning independent news outlet based in Yekaterinburg. Excluding state-funded media, every news outlet in Russia hates Elvira Nabiullina and thinks she’s a globalist stooge who is actively working to destroy Russia. The conservatives, the Orthodox hardliners, the Communists, the Neo-Bolshiviks, the nationalists—they all despise Nabiullina. This is a fact and why it is never conveyed to non-Russian “alternative news” consumers is a massive mystery.

I haven’t the slightest idea why Putin nominated this Yale World Fellow graduate for another term as the Bank of Russia’s governor, even though she is awful and nobody likes her. Probably this is part of Putin’s ingenious strategy to defeat the globalists with a programmable CBDC 100% controlled by an IMF-obedient central bank that operates independently from the Russian state.

MW: In our last interview, you delivered a stirring summary of our current epoch saying:

“I am often reminded of that unsettling line from Alexis de Tocqueville: “I go back from age to age up to the remotest antiquity; but I find no parallel to what is occurring before my eyes: as the past has ceased to throw its light upon the future, the mind of man wanders in obscurity.”

With each passing day it seems we are being forcibly severed from our own past. We are being “retrained” to accept a new civilizational model. It’s happening at the local, regional, national and global level. It is tearing apart families.

I do believe we are facing an evil that has no equal in human history.” Edward Slavsquat Substack

Judging from the response, I think there are a great number of people who feel the same as you do… My final question to you is this: Do you still feel as pessimistic as you did then?

RW: Mike, I would like to thank you (again) for that interview—it remains the most-read post on my blog. As you probably recall, the realities of Russia’s “public health” policies lacked “accuracy” (I’m trying to be charitable here) in 2021, and I think our internet exchange paved the way for a more fact-based, nuanced discussion about Russia’s “Covid response”.

Actually, I’m quite optimistic in the sense that I have accepted that there isn’t a 5-dimensional omnipotent white hat Twitter account that will save me from the Western Satanists, and I will have to save myself—which is actually relatively painless, easy, and even fun. I would even describe my current outlook as hopeful. But I fully understand the pessimism of someone who is sick of the US government, or any western government; someone who looks longingly at the Russian government as an alternative.

The problem with this curious way of thinking is that according to official data, around 30% of Russians live on less than $10 a day, Russia is facing a catastrophic demographic crisis (and it’s hard to think of a more basic metric for gauging the health and of a nation), and the Russian government is a fanatical proponent of policies that are chipping away at the last vestiges of basic human dignity.

But again, I am an optimist. I have been able to connect with like-minded individuals here in Russia, and all over the world, and my life has greatly improved as a result. I am able to live the life I want to live without having to make obscene excuses for the inexcusable.

We should all be guided by truth, friendship, and love, and why the so-called “alternative media” is so obsessed with carrying water for governments who offer the world nothing but more of the same (sadness) is truly amazing. Enough already. We have everything we need.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/putin-caho...ts/5836121

The Triumph Of The Apocalyptics
Oct 13, 2023
Jeffrey Tucker | The Brownstone Institute

In the course of almost four years, and really dating back a decade and a half, I’ve managed to read most of the writings of the intellectuals, titans of industry, and government officials who constructed the strange reality of 2020 and after. They wanted to conduct a science experiment on the human population. Because infectious disease knows no borders, they knew for sure it would have to be a global one.

They had every detail worked out in their models. They knew how far apart people would need to stand. They knew that the best way to stop any common virus from spreading would be total isolation of the whole human population insofar as that was possible. Families could not do that of course but they figured that they could live in different rooms or simply stay six feet apart. If they couldn’t do that, they could mask up.

It goes without saying – but they said it anyway because their models told them so – that indoor and outdoor venues where people gathered had to be closed (those were the exact words issued by the White House on March 16, 2020). The scheme was deployed first in China, then Northern Italy, then the United States, and the rest of the world fell in line, all but a handful of nations including Sweden, which faced many months of brutal criticism for allowing freedom for its citizens.

It’s truly hard to imagine what the architects of this barbaric policy believed would happen next. Is it as simple (and ridiculous) as believing that a respiratory virus would just disappear? Or that a potion would show up in time to inoculate the whole population even though no one has ever successfully come up with something like that before? Is that what they believed?

Maybe.

Or maybe it was just fun or otherwise remuneratively advantageous to try out a grand and global experiment on the human population. Certainly it was profitable for many, even if it wrecked the social, cultural, economic, and political lives of billions of people. Even as I write those words, it’s hard to believe they are not out of some dystopian fiction. And yet this is what happened.

Almost immediately, the idea of human rights took a back seat. Obviously so. So did the idea of equal freedom: that was immediately on the chopping block. By edict, the human population was divided into categories. It began with essential and nonessential, distinctions drawn from military protocols that suddenly pertained to the whole of the civilian world.

That was only the beginning of the stark divisions. The stigmatization of the sick began immediately too. Were they sick because they were insufficiently compliant? Did they disobey the protocols? In a hundred years of public health, we’ve not seen this level and scale of demarcation. Some of this was attempted during the AIDS crisis (pushed by none other than Anthony Fauci) but not this aggressively or comprehensively.

In those days, you could feel the concern for basic rights and freedom slipping, and with it the moral conscience of the public mind. From the beginning, it felt like martial law and the population was being divided: sick vs. well, compliant vs. noncompliant, essential vs non-essential, elective surgeries vs. emergencies needing medical services. And so on.

And this expanded dramatically over the coming months. When face coverings came along, it was masked vs unmasked. When some states started opening, it became red vs. blue. Us vs. them.

When the vaccine came along, the ultimate division hit, piling upon and swamping all the others: vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. The mandates massively disrupted the labor force. The public accommodations of whole cities were shut off to the unvaccinated, so that noncompliant citizens could not go to restaurants, bars, libraries, theaters, or other public places. Even houses of worship went along even though they didn’t have to, breaking their congregations into two parts.

Behind all of this was a political motive that traces to a text that every high expert still celebrates as a prescient and decisive refutation of liberal values: Carl Schmitt’s Concept of the Political from 1932. This essay is utterly dismissive of human rights on grounds that such notions do not sustain robust states. He was of course a Nazi jurist and his thought laid the groundwork for the demonization of the Jews and the march of the totalitarian state.

In Schmitt’s mind, the friend/enemy distinction is the best method of rallying the people around a grand cause that gives life meaning. This impulse is what gives strength to the state. He goes further: the friend/enemy distinction is best ignited in the reality of bloodshed:

    “The state as the decisive political entity possesses an enormous power: the possibility of waging war and thereby publicly disposing of the lives of men. The jus belli contains such a disposition. It implies a double possibility: the right to demand from its own members the readiness to die and unhesitatingly to kill enemies.”

If for years, you have asked the question “Where does this end?” we now have our answer, which seems inevitable in retrospect: war. We are looking at the deaths of innocents and probably this as just the beginning. The lockdowns broke not only the old moral codes and agreed-upon limits to state power. It broke the human personality and spirit the whole world over. It gave rise to a bloodlust that was barely beneath the surface.

States went crazy in bullying and dividing their citizens. It happened nearly everywhere but Israel was a leading case in point, as Brownstone has pointed out repeatedly. The citizenry has never been more divided and the state never more distracted from security concerns. The delicate peace was shattered in shocking ways on October 7, 2023 in a ghastly attack that revealed the worst security failure in the vulnerable state in its history.

That incident then encouraged and further unleashed the apocalyptics, whole peoples determined to take the next step in the dehumanization of the population and the use of appalling means of doing the unthinkable: extermination, a word now thrown around as if it is fine and normal to speak this way. This conflict has now reached further into the politics of every country and down to every civic association, communities of intellectuals, and personal friendship. As Schmitt might have loved – and what Bret Weinstein calls Goliath (the unity of administrative state, media, corporate power, and elite tech platforms) surely celebrates – everyone is being turned into the category of friend and enemy.

We are reminded at last of how incredibly fragile civilization – and the peace and freedom that gives rise to it – truly is. We should worry that in the drama of the moment, the history recounted above will be discarded from human memory. The plans for virus eradication failed so badly that many of its perpetrators are desperate for a dramatic change of subject so that they can avoid responsibility. Again, this is the desire, and it might even be the plan.

This simply cannot be allowed to happen. Those of us with memories of civilized life, including universal rights and freedoms, cannot stay silent or get emotionally drawn in to the point that we are willing to forget what was done to us, the damage it inflicted on public culture, and the moral conduct a civilized people expect.

Every war is preceded by a period of demoralization (I don’t matter), demotivation (there is nothing I can do), and dehumanization (those people are not worth saving). From there it is a simple matter of flipping the switch.

Brownstone was founded in light of the above history to shine a light on higher ideals, not a Schmittian war between friends and enemies but societies of compassion, dignity, freedom, rights, and the exercise of human volition against all threats and uses of violence public and private. This is our guiding light now and always. Apocalypticism builds nothing; it only destroys. It’s the instantiation of the philosophy of The Joker. No nation and no community can survive it.

Few of us knew or fully understood the depth of depravity just beneath the thin veneer of civilization that had previously dominated the large expanse of our lives. It was the maniacal experiment in disease control only a few years ago that triggered this bout of man’s inhumanity to man. There is a burning need to know how this came about and why, and take measures, now desperate ones, to put back into the Pandora’s box all that was released.

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-triu...calyptics/

https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content...0x401.jpeg

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e....16-AM.png

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_14...4x1552.png

Brainwashing Techniques Used to Increase COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake
October 16, 2023
Dr. William Makis | Global Research

I wish I had read this literature early on in the pandemic to realize and understand how truly evil and psychopathic the COVID-19 Propaganda and the Psychological Warfare on the population was.

From the brainwashing techniques outlined here, some of my observations:

    The appeal to “protect the community” was probably the most effective brainwashing technique – mainly to protect family, friends, the community, the healthcare system – they knew that this would pressure many vaccine hesitant to get the shots (especially concern about family members with medical conditions)
        this worked even better then they attached an emotion to it
    “The increased observability” was the most effective brainwashing technique to get people to adopt a brand new technology (LNP/mRNA), a technique that was used by Apple and its Ipod – and this was employed via “DIGITAL BADGES” on facebook that we now use to identify vaccine status of the thousands who are dying suddenly from COVID-19 Vaccine injuries.
        This also involved “PHYSICAL BADGES” which were in the form of vaccine cards that people proudly photographed and displayed on social media
    Finding a common enemy – went from a “novel Coronavirus” to the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” and this was tied in with:
        judging negatively those who refused to be vaccinated, the “free riders” who benefited from the herd immunity created by the vaccinated
        the unvaccinated once identified as “the common enemy” were punished and sanctioned by being excluded from society
        the poor treatment of the unvaccinated undoubtedly forced some to get vaccinated to avoid such a fate
    reputation concerns – doctors and scientists who did not conform to the Propaganda had their reputations smeared and destroyed and were made examples of by mainstream media to keep other doctors scared and sticking to the narrative, even at the cost of their or their own patients’ lives
        Justin Trudeau created a smear campaign of the unvaccinated, calling them names such as “fringe minority” and claiming that they were racists and misogynists
        thus “reputation destruction” was a strong brainwashing tool that probably forced some to get vaccinated
    vaccine scarcity was leveraged as first responders were given “hero” status and were the first ones lined up to get the vaccines as a sign of honor and a reward
        they were basically held up as examples for the rest of the population to follow
    REWARDS – ability to travel, go to restaurants, go to stadiums, concerts, participate in physical activities and sports – that, for a time, were only given to the vaccinated as “rewards” for being “good citizens”
        donuts, burgers & fries, ice cream for kids – predatory behavior
        $100 incentive or entry into a million dollar lottery
    PUNISHMENTS – vaccine mandates, employment termination, removal of unemployment benefits, decreased ability to travel, inability to find new employment, etc.
    Fear of loss of freedoms – this was another major driving factor, people didn’t want to lose the freedom to travel, the freedom to enjoy life (restaurants, concerts, sports, stadiums), the freedom to take care of loved ones
        this is now being contemplated as one of the key fear tactics in getting people to take COVID-19 boosters again.
        people will be reminded of lockdowns and the message will be: “you don’t want us to bring lockdowns back, do you? Then get vaccinated”
    Brainwashing by a trusted doctor – this is currently seen as one of the few plausible avenues to bring the COVID-19 vaccine hesitant back into the fold and get them to start taking mRNA vaccines regularly again.
        There will be huge pressure on doctors to get COVID-19 vaccine uptake up to 85% again
        this will be tied to regular doctor visits, physicals, annual doctor visits, etc.

Papers Reviewed:

    2023 Jun – Steffens et al – “Testing persuasive messages about booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines on intention to vaccinate in Australian adults: A randomised controlled trial”
    2023 Apr – Kleitman et al – “The Psychology of COVID-19 Booster Hesitancy, Acceptance and Resistance in Australia”
    2023 Mar – Limbu et al – “Why Some People Are Hesitant to Receive COVID-19 Boosters: A Systematic Review”
    2023 Jan – Fisher et al – “Impact of a physician recommendation on COVID-19 vaccination intent among vaccine hesitant individuals”
    2021 Dec – Erin James et al – “Persuasive messaging to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions”
    2021 Sep – Kachurka et al – “Persuasive Messages Will Not Increase COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance” (Polish people say fu*k you to propaganda)
    2021 Jun – Scott Ratzan et al – Missing the Point — How Primary Care Can Overcome Covid-19 Vaccine “Hesitancy”
    2021 Feb – Stacy Wood et al – “Beyond Politics — Promoting Covid-19 Vaccination in the United States”

2023 Jun – Steffens et al – “Testing persuasive messages about booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines on intention to vaccinate in Australian adults: A randomised controlled trial”

    Four propaganda messages were tested:
        1. Personal health benefits – booster gives you protection
        2. Community health benefits – booster reduces your risk of giving virus to your family, or people in the community who could get sick and die
        3. Non-Health Benefits – travel, go to weddings, see family and friends, getting a booster reduces chance that restrictions will return
        4. Personal agency – getting booster is a personal choice that give you control of your health and lets you protect people you care about.
    RESULTS:
        “messages emphasizing non-health benefits of getting a COVID-19 booster dose, like travelling, enjoying family occasions like weddings, and seeing family and friends, may increase intention to vaccinate, especially in hesitant populations.”
        “At the time, the Australian population had endured almost two years of public health restrictions, including lockdowns and international and domestic border closures. Being able to live more normally, free from restrictions, may have been top of mind, and hence what participants found the most persuasive.”
        “messages emphasizing personal agency may have negative impacts, especially with hesitant individuals.”
        “Hesitant individuals may have reacted negatively (psychological reactance) to suggestions about how they ought to behave, and what others approve or disapprove of regarding vaccination decisions”

2023 Apr – Kleitman et al – “The Psychology of COVID-19 Booster Hesitancy, Acceptance and Resistance in Australia”

    Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) identified three subgroups: Acceptant (61%), Hesitant (30%) and Resistant (9%).
    Hesitant and Resistant groups were less worried about catching COVID-19, used fewer official sources of COVID-19 info, checked the news less, were lower on the agreeableness personality dimension and reported more conservatism, persecutory thinking, amoral attitudes and need for chaos.
    Hesitant group (30%) also reported checking the legitimacy of information sources less, scored lower on the openness to new experiences personality dimension and were more likely than the Resistant and Acceptant groups to report regaining freedoms (e.g., travel) and work requirements or external pressures as reasons to get a booster
    Resistant group (9%) were higher on reactance, held more conspiratorial beliefs and rated their culture as being less tolerant of deviance than the Hesitant and Acceptant groups

Vaccines 11 00907 g004

Vaccines 11 00907 g007

2023 Mar – Limbu et al – “Why Some People Are Hesitant to Receive COVID-19 Boosters: A Systematic Review”

    COVID-19 Booster Vaccination Hesitancy Rate:
        North America is highest at 41%
        Europe 35%
        Asia 28%
        South America 28%
    younger people more reluctant to take boosters
    single or never married adults were more likely to be booster hesitant
    research on education and men vs women is mixed
    Compared to other occupations, health care workers, allied health professions, housewives, administrative staff & service workers were more likely to be booster hesitant.
    Vaccine Adverse Events were the most frequently reported predictor of hesitancy
    Reduced booster hesitancy: government mandates, booster recommendations from family or health care and community workers
    Increased booster hesitancy: when social networks or social media served as an important info source, or other factors:
        political messages discouraging boosters
        belief in natural immunity
        boosters are unnecessary
        personal health is in God’s hands
        COVID-19 is similar to seasonal flu
    “interventions that can harness normative social influence should be powerful. For example, information campaigns that rely on recommendations from celebrities, political figures, or groups trusted by the target audience should be more effective at reducing hesitancy”
    “Additionally, campaigns can explain how to overcome booster hesitancy among family and friends by providing information and strategies for effective normative influence on the booster hesitant from those close to them.”

2023 Jan – Fisher et al – “Impact of a physician recommendation on COVID-19 vaccination intent among vaccine hesitant individuals”

    Physicians and other healthcare providers are the most trusted source of information about the COVID-19 vaccine
    Recommendation from a physician has consistently been associated with higher rates of vaccine uptake for other vaccines such as the human papillomavirus (HPV) and influenza vaccines
    strong recommendation from a physician or healthcare provider may be influential in increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake and an important tool in fostering COVID-19 vaccine acceptance
    A presumptive style recommendation (e.g., “you are due for a flu shot”) is associated with increased vaccine uptake compared with a participatory style recommendation (e.g., “are you interested in getting a flu shot?”)
    Results: 33% became less hesitant following a doctor message
        39% “as safe as the flu shot” message was most effective in reducing hesitancy
        36% “I acknowledge your concerns, I’ve reviewed the studies”messag
        35% “protect others” message
        34% “I recommend that you get it”
        20% “What do you think?” message was least effective in reducing hesitancy
    Conclusion: “Encouraging physicians to provide an explicit recommendation is a promising means of increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the US”

2021 Dec – Erin James et al – “Persuasive messaging to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions”

    “Vaccination is both a self-interested and pro-social action – people protect themselves, but they also reduce chance of spreading disease to others”
    “people view vaccination as a social contract and are less willing to cooperate with the unvaxxed”
    “highlighting the reputational costs of choosing not to vaccinate could be an effective strategy for increasing uptake”
    “appeals to herd immunity and the pro-social aspect of vaccination have been shown to increase uptake”
    “messages that explain herd immunity increase willingness to receive a vaccine”
    “effective public health messages would also increase people’s willingness to encourage those close to them to vaccinate and to hold negative judgments of those who do not vaccinate”
    “by encouraging those close to them to vaccinate, people are both promoting compliance with social norms and increasing their own level of protection”
    “by judging those who do not vaccinate more negatively, they apply social pressure to others to promote cooperative behavior.”
    “free riders should be punished or ostracized for their past actions, to encourage pro-social outcomes” (a FREE RIDER is an unvaxxed person who is getting a “free ride” by getting protection from herd immunity that was created by the vaccinated around them who did the right thing”)

The Experimental Propaganda Messages

    baseline info = to end COVID-19 outbreak, must get jabbed, stops transmission, safe and effective, save millions of lives
    self-interest = reduces your risk of getting sick and dying, or long term disability
    community interest = reduces risk that members of your family and community could get sick and die (vaccination is a cooperative action to protect others)
    community interest + guilt = how guilty would you feel if you didn’t jab and gave COVID to someone you care about? (invoke emotion)
    community interest + embarrassment = how embarrassed and ashamed would you be if you didn’t jab and gave COVID to someone you care about? (emotion)
    community interest + anger = how angry will you be if you didn’t jab and give COVID to someone you care about? (invoke emotion)
    not bravery = military, doctors, firefighters risk their lives to serve others, that’s bravery. Not getting jabbed is reckless, you risk health of your family, friends and community. To get jabbed is to show strength. (reputation, social image concerns)
    trust in science = unvaxxed are ignorant or confused about science, and you’ll show others how ignorant or confused you are (reputation, social image concerns)
    personal freedom = unvaxxed increase risk we lose our freedoms or govt lockdowns will return. We all keep our freedom by getting jabbed.
    economic freedom = unvaxxed increase risk of govt lockdowns returning, getting jabbed means we all keep our ability to work and earn a living.
    community economic benefit = getting jabbed strengthens national economy

Most Effective Brainwashing Techniques

    to increase your willingness to jab: embarrassment, community, not bravery
    Guilt and embarrassment were most effective to increase your willingness to advise a friend to vaccinate
    Not bravery message was most effective to increase your negative judging of the unvaxxed.
    women responded more to the Trust in Science and Embarrassment, than men
    men responded more to the Not Bravery and Community Interest(without embarrassment) messages.
    Democrats were most easily brainwashed and responded to all messages
    Republicans appeared to react only to Community Interest, embarrassment
    Those high in vaccine confidence responded to all messages (all types of brainwashing)
    those low in confidence responded only to the Community Interestmessages
    CONCLUSION: Experiment findings support the “idea that vaccination is often treated as a social contract in which people are expected to vaccinate and those who do not are sanctioned”
    “messages that invoked reputational concerns were successful at altering judgment of those who would free ride on the contributions of others”
    propaganda must be tailored to target women differently than men

2021 Sep – Kachurka et al – “Persuasive Messages Will Not Increase COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance” (Polish people reject propaganda)

    6000 Polish internet users were sampled
    Propaganda Messages tested:
        reputation of vaxx makers: they’re American Pfizer and German Biontech
        efficiency: over 90%
        safety: European Medicines Agency confirms they’re safe, mild side effects
        others want it: 75% of people want to get jabbed as soon as possible
        Science authority: scientists say it’s the only rational choice
        vaccine passport convenience: vaxxed will be able to travel, not wear mask, not quarantine, will make everyday life easier
        scarcity: not enough jabs for everyone
        thoroughly tested: over 100,000 people were tested in clinical trials
        Price (they show you one): jab is free, free and you get 15 Euro, costs 2 EUR, costs 15 EUR
    RESULTS: 45% of respondents were unwilling to get vaccinated
        none of the messages were effective in reducing this hesitancy
        politically aligned left or center meant 60-80% were willing to get jabbed
        politically right or “ultra-right” or “none” or “other” 30-50% were willing to get jabbed
        up to 70% said they didn’t trust the government.

Authors suggest methods to increase vaccine uptake:

1. Focus on individual reasons – have their doctors try to convince them.

2. Turn those willing to be jabbed into “champions of the campaign” – through facebook stickers and physical stickers – and encourage them to talk to family and friends

3. Use reminders to ensure those who want to vaccinate actually follow through.

2021 Jun – Scott Ratzan et al – Missing the Point — How Primary Care Can Overcome Covid-19 Vaccine “Hesitancy”

    Among unvaccinated patients, there is a spectrum of vaccine “hesitance,” ranging from being “vaccine ready” to “vaccine neutral” to “vaccine resistant
    “vaccine ready” – must have ready access to vaccine to get them vaccinated
    “vaccine neutral” – may accept vaccination when seeking care for other problems, if vaccine is available and they get a “nudge” from a trusted clinician
    “vaccine resistant” – they must have “regularly scheduled doctor visits” – family doctors have a “core responsibility” to make preventive services including vaccination available, and persuade patients.
    “Primary care clinicians and trusted health care organizations often have the working relationships with community leaders to create solutions that fit local needs and preferences.”
    when boosters come, must put more focus on doctors, nurses, and community leaders who know how to create access, convey persuasive messages, and deliver care.

2021 Feb – Stacy Wood et al – “Beyond Politics — Promoting Covid-19 Vaccination in the United States”

    “Any successful marketing strategy will be multifaceted”
    “Consumer research and behavioral economics suggest 12 key strategies for an effective vaccine-promotion effort”
        1. Segment public by identity barriers – must tailor propaganda to various groups (some incorporate masks into self-image as symbol of community responsibility, others see wearing masks as cowardice or weakness)
        2. Find a common enemy – try to make the virus threat the common enemy
        3. Use analogy – “war against COVID”
        4. Increase observability – make vaccine status observable – vaxxed should wear tokens, bracelets, stickers, pins (like those given to voters), or “DIGITAL BADGES” – such as frames or banners for one’s social media profile photo – consumers’ ability to observe others’ choices can increase rate of adoption
        5. Leverage Vaccine Scarcity – frame early access to vaccines as a mark of honor or respect for people we want to protect (first responders, older Americans, medical staff, teachers, essential workers). First responders who are healthy – getting vaccine priority is a sign of respect awarded to them.
        6. Predict Negative Attributions – delays can be seen as govt incompetence, deployment in poor neighbourhoods can be seen as “experimentation” – must address these
        7. Prompt Anticipated Regret – push fear that someone you love will die from the illness, potential guilt of losing a family member, or guilt of getting Long COVID
        8. Avoid conveying piecemeal risk info – get bad info out there in one piece, instead of an ongoing trickle of information
        9. Promote compromise options – coffee shops use three serving sizes because consumer research shows it helps people make decisions – make vaccination a three option choice to avoid depicting jabs as the most extreme of two.
        10. Create FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) – employees can offer incentives like a day off, Universities can offer tickets to sports events or cultural events, tax benefits, insurance rebates, etc. Create “fear of missing out” on perks and benefits.
        11. Combat Uniqueness Neglect – many people believe they’re unique, so a once-size-fits-all option to mass vaccinate may not appeal to them – train medical professionals to identify these people, offer them unnecessary modifications to vaccine delivery (create “special treatment” to trick them into vaccination)
        12. Neutralize the Case versus Base-Rate Heuristic – people put more weight on anecdotes, especially on vaccine injury – force medical personnel to counter this with their own anecdotal stories (the pregnant woman who died because she didn’t get vaccinated, etc)

In the next part I will closely examine the DIGITAL BADGES that were used as propaganda to convince and pressure others into getting COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/propaganda...ke/5836502

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e....58-AM.png

Four Agreements Between Israel And Pfizer Have Been Released Via FOI Lawsuit That Prove The Israeli Government Conducted Forced Experiments On People
SASHA LATYPOVA | Substack
Oct 16, 2023

Israeli government “found” lost Pfizer agreements! Four agreements between Israel and Pfizer have been released via FOI lawsuit, still in a heavily redacted form. They prove that the Israeli government conducted forced experiments on people.

Israeli news article with detailed analysis and history of these FOI: The new documents reveal: 4 agreements and partial disclosure of redactions – more questions than answers

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e...dments.pdf

https://cdn.getmidnight.com/6908ab1f9a9e...ements.pdf

There are at least four key agreements/documents that the Israeli Ministry of Health (IMOH) signed with Pfizer, and the release of these documents after legal wrangling that went for months reveals that all four were signed even before the vaccine received the EUA from the FDA. The government attempted to conceal the real dates of the signing, and apparently created a false representation that it was signed later in order to lie to the people that the product was “authorized” by the FDA and EMA.

The four agreements that were released include:
The data sharing agreement with Pfizer

A copy was published by the IMOH on January 17, 2021, as the “Israel-Pfizer Agreement” or “Real-World Epidemiological Evidence Collaboration Agreement”. This is the agreement that specifies the terms of information sharing between the State of Israel and Pfizer in a “real world” study to be conducted in Israel – on Israeli citizens. The stated purpose of this agreement was to collect and analyze epidemiological data resulting from the vaccination of the Israeli population, and to determine whether herd immunity would be achieved as a result of the vaccine.

As a result of the FOI lawsuit, a signed copy of this agreement was found by the Israeli government. Previously, the government stated they “lost” it or could not locate it, but now they have found it. The most important finding from these two documents is the real date of signing of this agreement. In the latest released version (see link in this paragraph, p.4 of the pdf), the IMOH admits that this agreement was signed on December 1, 2020 – about five weeks earlier than was claimed before (i.e. January 6, 2021).

This proves that the IMOH actively concealed the true date of the signing of the agreement and lied about it while claiming a later date. This deception is important since the Israeli government relies entirely on FDA and EMA for approvals of medical products in the country and has little to no capacity to formally verify the completeness and rigorousness of the data used in making decisions by these ex-Israel government agencies. Thus, the Israeli public was entirely misled by the Israeli government. The EUA was granted to Pfizer by the FDA only on December 11, 2020. An EUA by the FDA simply means “we have no real evidence this works or is safe, but you can use it if you are desperate” – an EUA product is unlicensed and unapproved for anything. Thus, “The Information Sharing Agreement” with Israel was signed about ten days before even an emergency permit was received from the FDA for this product, and the IMOH tried to hide it and lied about it.

The released version of the agreement has many redactions and even the page numbers in the new copy are also redacted. The parts about liability waiver/potential pledge of state assets to Pfizer (US DOD/central bank owners?) are 100% redacted. There is a concern that the copy of the agreement may not include all of its pages.

The production and supply agreement with Pfizer (aka “Manufacturing and Supply Agreement”)

This agreement has been released for the first time; however, its existence has been known since the unsigned copy of “The Information Sharing Agreement” was first published in January 2021. It is now clear that the purchase transaction itself was signed on December 1, 2020, at the same time as “The Information Sharing Agreement”.
Confidentiality Agreement

It appears that this agreement was signed by the Ministry of Health and Pfizer on July 12, 2020. In fact, this agreement was signed three months before Pfizer submitted an application, and even before the company began the phase 3 study on its product.

    “The series of agreements signed with Pfizer thus includes at least four agreements/documents: a Confidentiality Agreement signed on July 12, 2020; a Principles document signed on November 13, 2020; a Production and Distribution Agreement signed on December 1, 2020; and an Information Sharing agreement also signed on December 1, 2020. As shown in the timeline diagram attached below, all four agreements were signed before the vaccine received the EUA, and the Principles document was even signed before Pfizer submitted the request for approval. Additionally, the confidentiality agreement was signed before the company began its Phase 3 study, says Attorney Gur. “Under such circumstances, it is very difficult to take seriously the claim that this is not a real human experiment”.

The main conclusion from the above is the following:

The Israeli Ministry of Health “approved” the import of Pfizer mRNA injections before even the superficial FDA’s issuance of the EUA! At the same time they agreed to give Pfizer the medical data on the effects of this “black box” substance on the Israeli population. Then they lied to the people, claiming the product was tested and approved by the FDA, and furthermore, forced the injections without informed consent by using extremely harsh and coercive measures.

If this doesn’t say “forced medical experimentation without consent” I don’t know what does.

I would like to state that I am very much anti- the anti-Semitism that is evidently practiced by the Israeli government against the population of Israel. I am having hard time identifying material differences between the actions of the Israeli government towards the Israeli people and what happened under the Nazi rule in Germany 1941-1945. CIA library Wiki is not a reliable source, but one key difference stands out – there were about 15,000 victims of Nazi medical experiments in Germany, perhaps more. With the current mRNA injected atrocity in Israel, we have millions of victims who were forced into the mRNA transfection experiment, including pregnant women and children. The population of Israel is around 9 million, and coerced covid injections uptake was high (approx 4 million received 3 shots):

    within 2 months about half of the total population had received a vaccine dose. As of 1st June 2021, 81% of the population aged ≥16 years had received the second vaccine dose. Vaccine uptake was high, exceeding 75% among those aged 20 years and increasing with age, surpassing 90% in individuals aged ≥60 years.

The numbers of the medical experimentation victims (deaths, disabilities and injuries) is likewise very high. The vaccine injured group on Facebook in Israel has 42,000 participants according to this article. If the estimated short-term death numbers from worldwide data apply in Israel (~1/800 – 1/1000 injections), that we can expect at least 100,000 deaths from these shots (a conservative estimate).

On a more technical note, the Pfizer-Israel contracts refer to “Rule 29”, i.e. the covid injections were expected to be imported into Israel under this rule. Confirming that the government was knowingly signing off on a dangerous mass experiment. The rule is an “exception” to marketing of approved medical products, including for what appears to indicate use of chemical and radiological weapons. This is equivalent to the “countermeasures” provisions in the US and EU law.

Exceptions to pharmaceutical marketing authorization procedures “Rule 29”(source describing regulations of pharmaceuticals in Israel):

    In special circumstances, a medicine may be exempt from registration in Israel if it falls within one of the exemptions listed in Regulation 29(a) of the Pharmacists Regulations (Preparations), as implemented by the MOH’s Director General. This includes where:The medicine is to be used as part of a compassionate useprogramme.The medicine is intended for the treatment of a serious disease or medical condition and no alternative medicines for treating the same disease or medical condition are registered and marketed in Israel.The medicine is designated for the medical treatment of Israeli residents in relation to an epidemic or other contagious disease.The medicine concerns protection from chemical or radioactive substances.

Finally, my educated guess on what happened in Israel, and worldwide, with regard to knowingly pushing poisonous injections across various state borders: the top government/intelligence officials probably knew that the covid exercise was a global population control/enslavement/NWO plan.

That’s just a few people per country, however, who are fully briefed on the real reasons. The rest of the officialdom were sold the ostensible reasons, the CIA-Pentagon story of e.g., “engineered lethal virus/lab leak from China” and thus all the military style responses, countermeasures and associated secrecy + panic + forced lockstep measures propagated from WHO were deemed ok throughout the many layers of bureaucracy. Down below that are the layers which were sold Hollywood bullshit about pandemics from bats and monkeys and told to be healthcare heroes: “doing their jobs” and “we are in it together” and “protect grandma or our precious socialist healthcare system”. My readers are well aware by now that a large scale atrocity is very easily committed by nice people as long as the tasks are compartmentalized enough, and minimally plausible narratives supplied to provide the excuse for the moral cowards to go along.

I may be paranoid or too jaded, but I can’t help but see the connections to the most recent “screw-up” of the Israeli intelligence somehow missing the Hamas attack along what is supposed to be some of the most secure and surveilled border in the world.

https://i0.wp.com/substackcdn.com/image/...#038;ssl=1

Riiight, they just “missed” the breach of that super-wall for 20+ hours.Was it intentional? This means everything happening now was planned. The Israel Government has refused to explain why the Israel Defense Forces, with 173,000 active personnel, 193 fighter jets, 38 attack helicopters and 1,760 tanks on standby, and advance warning of an attack, took almost 3 days to cross the 77 miles from Jerusalem to Gaza.

Was this orchestrated attack precipitated by the truth about the global covid atrocity coming out and people realizing what has been done to them and why – the ultimate goals of the cabal? Is the globalist cabal behind the puppets in the Israeli government (and all other major governments) unhappy with the population reduction numbers achieved so far, e.g. far short of the Deagel predictions (population reduction targets were US -70%, Israel -63%) and now needs to push for the next phase of destruction – the kinetic global war?

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/isr...al-israeli

“Second Nuremberg” lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, who sought to hold COVID bioweapon culprits accountable, SEIZED by German government in Mexico
10/18/2023 // Ethan Huff

Tags: arrest, badhealth, badmedicine, Big Pharma, bioweapon, conspiracy, corruption, COVID, covid-19, deep state, enslaved, Germany, humanitarian, jail, Mexico, obey, pandemic, persecution, prison, Reiner Fuellmich, Second Nuremberg, Suppressed

https://leohohmann.com/2023/10/16/intern...in-mexico/

While he and his wife were visiting Mexico over the weekend, German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich was seized by the German government and taken back to Germany where he was arrested and taken to a jail in Frankfurt.

Fuellmich is leading the "Second Nuremberg" project to hold the purveyors behind the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "pandemic" and its associated "vaccines" responsible for their crimes against humanity, making him an enemy of the state.

According to reports, Fuellmich lost his passport and scheduled a visit to the Germany embassy in Tijuana. When he arrived, German officials were ready and waiting for him, along with a 30-page document full his charges, which as of now have not been revealed publicly.

"When he entered the embassy on Friday, there were six men waiting to detain him," explains Leo Hohmann on his blog.

"The charges, as his attorney Dagmar Shoen found out when she received the official papers, were 30 pages long, so this was something carefully planned and executed. The charges are related to allegations of Viviane Fischer, a former team member of Fuellmich's on the Corona Committee, who accused him of financial wrongdoing."

(Related: At the height of COVID, researchers published a study clearly showing that Fauci Flu shot spike proteins damage heart cells while altering heart function.)

Is Reiner Fuellmich being punished by the deep state for outing and pursuing justice for crimes against humanity?

Three different people signed the charges against Reiner, which is strange considering the money in question is currently – or at least was – in the bank account of one of these three.

Apparently, Fuellmich was lured to the German embassy in Tijuana where he was then kidnapped, seeing as how there is no extradition treaty between Mexico and Germany. Protests in support of Fuellmich are already being scheduled in Germany and elsewhere.

Fuellmich heads up the International Crimes Investigative Committee, which is working to unveil everything surrounding the release of COVID and the subsequent launch of Operation Warp Speed, which allowed for COVID jabs to be mandated in many countries around the world.

Speaking in support of Fuellmich, Emanuel Pastreich, former president of the Asia Institute, wrote that the general public needs to take a stand for not just Fuellmich but the thousands of other people just like him who are "standing up against the efforts to turn governments into the puppets of corporations, international banks, and the billionaire class, the parasite class, that lurks behind them.

"We know that if we do not stop this effort to destroy the rule of law, at every level, to create a separate realm that belongs only to the very wealthy and powerful, that we are guaranteed a global fascistic system which will, if it can, exterminate us in precisely the way that was attempted in Europe in the 1940s," Pastreich warns.

"I want to also stress that this effort to suppress someone working so hard to enforce the rule of law and to bring the truth to everybody, at precisely the moment that a drive is on to start a world war between Israel and Iran, including the United States, and conceivably many other countries, is no coincidence, but in fact they are parallel."

"If we cannot name the crimes, if we cannot identify the enemy, there is no way that either beautiful words, or rapid action, can have any possible positive outcome. And we know all too well that these invisible powers have already set up for us a baited gambit, giving us false choices, whether it be between Trump and Biden, or Hamas and Israel ... choices which are intended to confuse us and to divide us against each other so that we cannot come together in opposition to this domination of the entire world by the billionaire class."

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-10-18-s...exico.html

Letters to the Editor
By Windlander
October 16, 2023

The mass murdering Khazarian Mafia think they can avoid war crimes trials by arresting lawyers like Reiner Fuellmich on trumped up charges. Chancellor Olaf Scholz  and Ursula von der Leyenwill will be held personally responsible for this atrocity. So will the agents involved in his kidnapping.

UPDATE on REINER FUELLMICH’S ARRESTE

ELSA
OCT 15, 2201
How did Reiner Fuellmich get arrested in Frankfurt? What was he doing in Frankfurt?
I’ve listened to the live broadcast, Dagmar Schoen on Bittel.tv. In German.
Here’s the translation.
Reiner and his wife lost their passports and visas quite some time ago, needed to get them replaced. As they have been staying in Mexico, this led to their needing to go to the German embassy in Tijuana, Mexico. The first time they went, on Monday, they needed to come back. Dagmar was already uneasy, but everything seemed all right.
A time was arranged, for Friday, for them to pick up the documents. So the embassy knew exactly when they would be arriving.
When they went back on Friday, Reiner’s wife got her documents and was allowed to go. Reiner was arrested. He had nothing with him, only the clothes he was wearing. No toothbrush, even.
A warrant for his arrest had been issued in March. A second warrant was issued in May. One was from Germany and the other from the EU. Obviously he was not informed.
As Reiner was in Mexico, which is outside the jurisdiction of the EU, the warrants could not be enforced.
So there needed to be a way to get him onto German soil.
Reiner’s needing a new passport and visa gave those who wanted him arrested the perfect opportunity.
When he entered the embassy on Friday, there were 6 men waiting to detain him, take him to the airport, escort him to Germany.
The charges, as Dagmar found out when she had the official papers opened, were 30 pages long – so this was something carefully planned and executed.
They related to allegations of Viviane Fischer, a former team member on the Corona Committee, about financial wrongdoing.
Three people signed the charges against Reiner.
Perhaps the craziest aspect of the charges is that the money Reiner allegedly took is in the bank account (or anyway, was in the bank account) of one of the 3 people.
_________________
Source: https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/break...taken-from

https://benjaminfulford.net/2023/10/16/l...editor-39/