Is the United States becoming a police state? Incredibly the answer is yes, and both sides of the aisle agree. The only difference is that each accuses the other of seeking to establish a police state. Who’s right? This film resolves the question by defining what a police state is, and showing how it got started, how it operates, and who’s in charge. Working with Dan Bongino, Dinesh D’Souza has created his scariest and timeliest film!

https://rumble.com/v3rodbv-police-state-...souza.html

https://rumble.com/v3sdcbj-police-state-...earcy.html

The Final Pieces Of The 'Police State' Puzzle Are Being Rammed Into Place: With Hillary Clinton Pushing 'Concentration Camps' To 'Deprogram' Conservatives, 2024 Will Be A Year Like Never Before
- Democrats Are Using Their Own 'Secret Police' To Strike Fear In 'The People'
By D. Parker and All News Pipeline
October 27, 2023

Mail-in voting has made the secret ballot a thing of the past. That will be the 'death of democracy,' with new threats from the far left.

Loss of secrecy is one of the worst but hardly ever discussed dangers with mail-in voting. What do you think is going to happen in light of recent reports of leftists openly threatening to “deprogram” and persecute Trump voters?

Do leftists ever feel any shame for what they have done to this country by voting for the current regime and tacitly supporting it with their silence?

Dinesh D’Souza was recently on the Glenn Beck Program discussing his new film, Police State, going through the features of this kind of regime, with many uncannily already in place, as brought on by Biden or his hidden handler therein.

This is from people who still have the chutzpah to falsely label themselves as “liberals.” We’ve noticed that most of the pro-freedom side has refrained from calling them that, but leftists persist in maintaining the lie.

https://www.glennbeck.com/st/podcast

https://dcs.megaphone.fm/BMDC1262563756....3&source=3

https://policestatefilm.net/

Recent weeks have also seen Hillary Clinton go full authoritarian in declaring that she wants to “deprogram” her political opponents — in other words, more than half the country, presumably in some camps, where we would be “concentrated.” Meanwhile, there was a report that the FBI, the once pre-eminent law enforcement organization in the world, has its eye on Trump-supporters — moving this once august organization into the realm of infamous secret police organizations used to strike fear in the people: KGB, Gestapo, Stasi, AVO, MSS, Sabine.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2023...tm-vpx.cnn

https://www.newsweek.com/2023/10/13/excl...31836.html

https://www.britannica.com/topic/secret-police

Naturally, the national socialist media denied this report with one-line editorials such as “The obvious holes in the ‘FBI targets Trump supporters’ story.”

For those unfamiliar with the obfuscation tactics of the fascist far left, you can always tell when they don’t have the goods as promised in the headline when they “bury the lede.” In other words, they ramble on about tangential subject matter before trying to make their point.

The problem with these abject denials is that they are plausible only if taken in isolation. In the case of Mr. Trump, we have this report in the context of the FBI ignoring the actions of the fascists of Antifa and the BLM riots...as well as the same FBI investigating parents as terrorists who attended school board meetings or Catholics attending church.

You would have to be blind not to see the dark direction the fascist far left is taking the country, with the over-the-top persecution of President Trump while Beijing Biden and his crime family have gone way beyond the appearance of impropriety, showing that we have a two-tier justice system.

Now add into the mix what are at best unsubstantiated reports of FBI persecution of Trump voters with the loss of secrecy of mail-in voting. Discussions surrounding this “democratic” abomination usually center on the potential for voter fraud, as in the words of former Democrat president Jimmy Carter on the danger of mail-in voting.

Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.

But the loss of secrecy is even worse in light of the Hillary asseveration and the Newsweek report on the FBI in context with their other “activities” as in this article in Real Clear Politics on the subject: “What Americans Lost When We Abandoned the Secret Ballot.”

Ballot secrecy is not just a right of the individual but also a guarantee to all that my vote was not wrung from me by bribery or intimidation.

Out of a desire to make voting “easier” and perhaps exaggerated fears of public gatherings during the pandemic, most U.S. jurisdictions permitted unrestricted mail-in balloting in 2020. What did Americans lose when ballot secrecy was attenuated or vanished altogether?

Make no mistake, ballot secrecy is incompatible with secure mail-in balloting. At the polls, we each go into a little booth and make our choices in private. By contrast, no one knows where a mail-in ballot was filled out, or if a party or union activist hovered over the voter or even filled in the circles. Nobody knows what inducements, whether cash or threats, were offered to ensure that the person voted “correctly.” And if the ballot was “harvested” – turned in to the vote-counters by activists instead of by voters themselves – our suspicions deepen.

How many people are going to be intimidated out of voting for President Trump if it’s known that the FBI and the fascist far left are openly talking about going after them to “deprogram” them? And in the best-case scenario, that there are merely reports that the FBI is going to investigate and put them on a list if they dare vote for President Trump?

Naturally, the national socialist media have “fact-checked” this issue, as they always do, with assertions against the fascist far left, with a laughable proviso that doesn’t even get close to passing the smell test:

Fact-checking William Barr: Is your vote no longer secret with mail-in ballots?

Washington (CNN) — Attorney General William Barr has become one of the staunchest supporters of the President’s campaign against mail-in voting. Speaking in Phoenix on Thursday, Barr continued to push false and negative narratives about mail-in voting.

“There’s no more secret vote, there’s no secret vote,” Barr said. “Your name is associated with a particular ballot. The government and the people involved can find out and know how you voted. And it opens up the door to coercion.” ...

Of Barr’s claim that “governments and the people involved” can find out how someone voted, Charles Stewart, a political science professor at MIT, said “that’s just incorrect, if people follow the law.”

“If people follow the law”? Sometimes you just have to laugh at the little rhetorical escape clauses leftists stick in their “fact-checks.” Sure, we can always trust the far left to follow the law, just as we can trust leftists always to tell the truth. If you buy that, you’ll buy anything.

We now see the closing of the trap. The COVID crisis provided the authoritarians with the perfect opportunity to force mail-in voting down our throats. And they’ve debased the language so much that if you question their election wins (but only theirs), you are an “election denier,” which linguistically and logically doesn’t make any sense.

Thus, the final piece of the puzzle is in place. They assert that support for President Trump should be illegal and suppress his support out of fear that this will be discovered during the insecure mail-in voting process.

There is an infamous ballot from the dark days of Germany and the iron-fisted rule of the Third Reich that has only one slot...for that “swashbuckling little politician,” Adolf Hitler.

Isn’t that what the fascist far left is striving for today? Leftists want one-party authoritarian rule, like a certain National Socialist Labor Party, and they still have the cojones to project that on the pro-freedom right.

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/The_Fina..._Place.php

(Note by Hissil: also see these links)
https://hyperspacecafe.com/Thread-Paul-McCartney
https://hyperspacecafe.com/Thread-Paul-I...er-Is-Paul
https://hyperspacecafe.com/Thread-Paul-M...ly-Is-Dead
https://hyperspacecafe.com/Thread-Ringo-...ed-in-1966
https://hyperspacecafe.com/Thread-Paul-M...ut-at-Last
https://hyperspacecafe.com/Thread-Paul-M...-Operation
https://hyperspacecafe.com/Thread-Paul-M...e-Harrison
https://hyperspacecafe.com/Thread-THE-AS...-MCCARTNEY

Quote:Was Paul McCartney Murdered for Opposing the Deep State?
Henry Makow (October 21, 2023):
It's the weekend. As a change of pace, I present an article by a reader, Clare Kuehn, that casts Paul McCartney's murder and replacement in a new light. "Mark Lane said Paul was convinced "Oswald couldn't have done it," and wanted to write his very first film score for Lane's upcoming film of his book, Rush to Judgment. Had Paul written his first film score and backed such a film, in the heady days for the Beatles, in 1966, and only three-and-a-half years after the assassination of JFK, the dam against JFK-assassination conspiracy case-making would have broken."

Brian (October 22, 2023):
It's all too apparent that Paul McCartney was replaced by one "Billy Shears." His eye color changed from brown to blue, and he grew 2-3 inches in height at the age of 23. There are many well-done YouTube videos that cover the many differences. The best book about the replacement of Paul is Tina Foster's 'Plastic Macca,' where she has a chapter covering the new "Paul" getting the real Paul's history wrong. I'm uneasy about a sinister end to Paul's life, and stick to the accidental car crash theory. But, anything is possible in our controlled/backward society.

https://henrymakow.com/2023/10/was-paul-...ed-fo.html

All Wars Are Bankers Wars
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
October 23, 2023

https://rumble.com/v3jj4nw-documentary-a...-wars.html

The video above features a 2013 documentary, “All Wars Are Bankers Wars,” written and narrated by Michael Rivero,1 founder of whatreallyhappened.com. As explained by Rivero, all wars can be traced back to the private central bankers.

“The more you study this, the more you’ll realize that ALL wars are wars for the private central bankers,” he says. American soldiers have fought and died in wars initiated for no other purpose than to force private central banking on nations that didn’t want them.

Usury — The Birth of Money From Money

The philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BC) once said:

“The most hated sort [of moneymaking], and with the greatest reason, is usury, which makes a gain out of money itself, and not from the natural use of it. For money was intended to be used in exchange, but not to increase at interest.

And this term ‘usury,’ which means the birth of money from money, is applied to the breeding of money, because the offspring resembles the parent. Wherefore of all modes of making money this is the most unnatural.”

What Aristotle described is the business model of all central banks. They make money out of thin air by lending money at interest, and in the process, they drain a nation of its wealth. The first bankers war example illustrated in the film is that of the American Revolution, fought between 1775 and 1783.

Thirteen of Great Britain’s North American colonies revolted against British rule and established the sovereign United States of America, founded with the Declaration of Independence in 1776.

American Revolution Was Fought to Prevent Central Banking

However, as explained by Rivero, the American Revolution was instigated by the King George III Currency Act, which forced the North American colonists to conduct business using Bank of England banknotes borrowed at interest:

“If you go back to the writings of Ben Franklin … [here’s] a direct quote: ‘The refusal of King George III to allow the colonies to operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, was probably the prime cause of the revolution.’

That’s Ben Franklin. Our public schools don’t teach that because you’re not supposed to know that the bankers were really behind the American Revolution.

After the revolution, the United States adopted a revolutionary radically different economic system in which the government issued its own value-based currency, so that private banks couldn’t skim the wealth of the people through interest bearing banknotes. So the American Revolution was fought primarily to free the American people from King George the third’s Currency Act …”2

When Corruption Fails, Threats Are Made

Unfortunately, it’s easy to corrupt people, and the central bankers know that better than most. Just one year after Mayer Amschel Rothschild uttered the now-infamous quote, “Let me issue and control the nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws,” private bankers succeeded in setting up a private central bank, called The First Bank of the United States.

This bank was founded in 1791, and within 20 years, it had gutted the U.S. economy while enriching the bank owners. As a result of its obvious failures, Congress refused to renew the bank’s charter. The intention was to return to a state-issued, value-based currency, for which Americans would not have to pay any interest. In response, Nathan Mayer Rothschild issued the following threat:

“Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war.”

Despite that threat, Congress held firm and refused to renew the bank’s charter. Nathan Mayer Rothschild railed against the decision, stating:

“Teach those impudent Americans a lesson! Bring them back to colonial status!”

And that’s exactly what Great Britain did — or tried to do. The Rothschild-controlled Bank of England financed Britain’s War of 1812, the aim of which was to either a) recolonize the United States and force Americans to use Bank of England banknotes, or b) plunge the nation into so much debt, they’d have no choice but to accept a new private central bank.

“And the plan worked,” Rivero says. “Even though the United States won the war of 1812, Congress was forced to grant a new charter for yet another private bank, issuing the public currency as loans at interest.

Once again, private bankers were in control of the nation’s money supply and cared not who made the laws or how many British or American soldiers had to die for it. And once again, the nation was plunged into debt, unemployment and poverty by the predations of the private central bank.

In 1832, Andrew Jackson successfully campaigned for his second term as President under the slogan, ‘Jackson and No Bank.’ True to his word, Jackson succeeded in blocking the renewal of the charter for the Second Bank of the United States of America …

Shortly after the charter for the Second Bank of the United States expired, there was an assassination attempt on Andrew Jackson. It failed when both pistols used by the assassin, Richard Lawrence, failed to fire.

Later on, Lawrence explained the motive for the assassination by saying that, with President Jackson dead, money would be more plenty. So, it was an assassination motivated by the interests of the bankers.”

Debt Is an Enslavement System

The reason you never learned this in school is because the public school system is subservient to the bankers, who want certain history to remain hidden. When the Confederacy seceded from the United States, the bankers offered to fund Lincoln’s efforts to bring them back into the union — at 30% interest.

Lincoln replied that he would “not free the black man by enslaving the white man to the bankers,” and instead issued a new government currency, the greenback. The following quote from the London Times is a telling one:3

“If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become endurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost.

It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”

France and Britain considered invading the United States in support of the Confederacy, but were held at bay by Russia, which came to the aid of Lincoln’s Union.4 The Union won the war, but Lincoln was assassinated in 1865. The interest-free greenbacks were pulled from circulation, and America was again forced into banknotes borrowed at interest from private central bankers.

In 1913, the private central bankers of Europe met with their American collaborators on Jekyll Island, Georgia, where they formed a new American banking cartel. Rivero explains:

“Owing to hostility over the previous banks of the United States, the name of this third bank was changed to the Federal Reserve, in order to grant the new bank a quasi governmental image. But in fact, it is a privately owned bank. It’s no more federal than Federal Express …

So 1913 proved to be a transformative year for the nation’s economy. First with Congress’ passage of the 16th income tax amendment, and the false claim it had been ratified. Here’s another direct quote [from U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox, in Sullivan v. United States 2003]:

‘I think if you were to go back and try and find and review the ratification for the 16th amendment, which was the Internal Revenue, the income tax … you would find that a sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment.’”

Later that year (1913), President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act, in exchange for campaign contributions — a decision he later regretted. In 1919, Wilson wrote:

“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country, a great industrial nation is now controlled by a system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”

World War I and II Were Bankers Wars

According to Rivero, the real reason behind World War I — which began as a squabble between Austria, Hungary and Serbia and only later shifted to focus on Germany — was Germany’s industrial capacity, which posed an economic threat to Great Britain, the currency of which was in decline due to its lack of focus on industrial development.

After Germany’s defeat, the private bankers seized control of Germany’s economy, which resulted in hyperinflation. After the collapse of the Weimar Republic, the National Socialist party came into power and issued a new state currency not borrowed from central banks.

“It was based on a unit of value, not a unit of debt. Freed from having to pay interest on the money in circulation, Germany blossomed and quickly began to rebuild its industry. It was an amazing transformation to see. The media called it the German Miracle.

Time Magazine lionized Hitler for the amazing improvement of life for the German people and the explosion of German industry. They even named him Time Magazine’s Man of the Year in 1938.

And then, once again, Germany’s prosperity and freedom from a private Central Bank loaning the public currency at interest became a threat to other nations and other powers …

Germany’s state-issued value-based currency was also a direct threat to the wealth and power of the private central banks around the world, and as early as 1933, they started to organize a global boycott against Germany to strangle this upstart ruler who thought he could run his nation without a private central bank.”

World War II was basically a repeat of World War I, in that quashing Germany’s economic and industrial power was the chief goal. In a March 1946 note from Winston Churchill to Harry Truman, the reason for World War II was made clear:

“The war wasn’t only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have if we had intended so prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn’t want to.”

According to Rivero, Churchill also made the following statement in his book series “The Second World War”:

“Germany’s unforgivable crime before World War II was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system, and to build up an independent exchange system from which the world finance couldn’t profit anymore. We butchered the wrong pig.”

Our Military Are ‘Muscle’ for the Bankers

Rivero goes on to tell the story of how, in 1933, Wall Street bankers recruited Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler to lead a coup against the U.S. government, with the intent of installing a a fascist dictatorship. At the time, President Roosevelt’s “New Deal” threatened to redistribute wealth to the working middle class, which they were intent on preventing.

The idea was to get rid of the U.S. government in its entirety, and install a Secretary of General Affairs who would answer to Wall Street alone, and not the people. Butler pretended to go along with the plot, and then exposed it to Congress before it could be carried out.

Roosevelt tried to have the plotters arrested, but was told that if any of the central bankers were sent to prison, their remaining Wall Street buddies would deliberately collapse the economy and blame Roosevelt for it. Butler, in his 1935 book “War Is a Racket” also confessed the following:

“I spent 33 years and four months in active military service as a member of our country’s most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major General, and during that period, I spent more of my time being a high class muscle man for big business, for Wall Street and for the bankers.

In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I’m sure of it. Like all members of the military profession, I never had an original thought until after I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of the higher-ups.

This is typical with everyone in the military service. Thus, I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in.

I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909 through 1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China in 1927, I helped see to it that the Standard Oil wound its way unmolested.

During those years I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. I was rewarded with honors, medals and promotions. Looking back on it, I feel I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was operate his racket in three city districts. I operated on three continents.”

The Why Behind the Kennedy Assassination

In 1963, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, who understood the predatory nature of private central banking, signed executive order 11110, which ordered the U.S. Treasury to issue a new public currency called the United States note. These banknotes would not be borrowed from the Federal Reserve but rather created by the U.S. government and backed by silver.

This represented a return to the system of economics the United States had been founded on. “All told, some $4.5 billion went into the public circulation, which eroded interest payments to the Federal Reserve and loosened their control over the nation,” Rivero says. Five months later, Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, and the United States notes were pulled from circulation and destroyed. Rivero continues:

“Following Kennedy’s assassination, John J. McCloy, president of the Chase Manhattan Bank and president of the World Bank, was named to the Warren Commission. Now, I don’t care how good a banker he is, he’s not qualified to be investigating a murder, which is what we were told the Warren Commission was all about …

We all know that the Warren Commission was there to cover up what was going on. And, obviously, we can safely presume that John J. McCloy’s presence on the Warren Commission was to make sure the American public never got even a hint of the financial dimensions behind the assassination.”

The Rise and Fall of Bretton Woods

In July 1944, at the end of World War II, once it became obvious that the allied forces were winning and would be able to dictate the post-war political environment, the world economic powers met at Bretton Woods in New Hampshire to hammer out what became known as the Bretton Woods agreement for international finance, which was ratified the following year.

Under this new agreement, the U.S. dollar replaced the British pound as the global trade and reserve currency, and signatory nations were obligated to tie their national currencies to the dollar. As explained by Rivero:

“The nations that ratified Bretton Woods did so on two conditions. The first was that the Federal Reserve would refrain from over-printing the dollar as a means to loot real products … from other nations, in exchange for ink and paper.

It was basically an imperial tax imposed by the U.S. economic system on the rest of the world. That assurance of no over-printing was supposedly backed up by the second requirement, which was that the U.S. dollar would always be convertible back to gold by the U.S. government at $35 an ounce.

Now, of course, the Federal Reserve, being a private bank and not answerable to the U.S. government did in fact start over-printing paper dollars, which were sent to other nations around the world, and under Bretton Woods, they had to send back products and produce and raw materials at full value.

Much of the perceived American prosperity in the 1950s and ‘60s was the result of these foreign nations having to send real raw materials, goods, produce back to the United States in exchange for the these little pieces of paper … because they were forced to accept these paper notes as being worth $35 per ounce of gold.

Then, in 1970, France started looking at this huge pile of printed paper notes sitting in their bank vaults, for which real French product like wine and cheese had been traded, and it notified the United States government that they would exercise their option under Bretton Woods to return all those paper notes for gold at the agreed upon $35 per ounce exchange rate.

The problem was, the United States had nowhere near the gold to redeem all those paper notes. So, on August 15, 1971, Richard Nixon temporarily — nudge, nudge, wink, wink — suspended gold convertibility of the U.S. Federal Reserve notes. This … effectively ended Bretton Woods and many global currencies started to delink from the U.S. dollar.”

Land Grabs and the Birth of the Petro Dollar

Nixon’s suspension of Bretton Woods also created another problem. Rivero explains:

“The United States had been collateralizing their loans — money borrowed from other governments and foreign investors — with the American nation’s gold reserves, and with the awareness that there wasn’t enough gold to redeem all the Federal Reserve notes, lenders to the U.S. were starting to wonder: Did the U.S. government have enough gold to cover … their outstanding debts?

Foreign nations began to get very nervous about the loans to the United States and they were understandably reluctant to loan any additional money without some form of collateral.

So what Richard Nixon did is he founded the environmental movement, with the EPA and its various programs, like wilderness zones and roadless areas, inherited rivers, wetlands, and all these other programs, which all took vast areas of public lands and made them off limits to the American people who are technically the owners of all those lands.

But Nixon had no concern for the environment. The real purpose of this land grab under the guise of the environment was to pledge those pristine lands and their vast mineral resources as collateral on the outstanding national debt.

The multitude of all these different programs was simply to conceal the scale of the land grabbing, the collateralization of the American people’s heritage … Almost 25% of the entire nation is now locked up by these EPA programs and pledged as collateral on government borrowing.

Now, with available lands for collateralization already in short supply, the U.S. government embarked on a new program to shore up sagging international demand for the dollar. The United States approached the world’s oil producing nations, mostly in the Middle East, and offered them a deal in exchange for only selling their oil for dollars.

The United States would guarantee the military safety of those oil-rich nations, and the oil rich nations would agree to spend and invest their U.S. paper dollars inside the United States, particularly in U.S. Treasury bonds, which would be redeemable through future generations of US taxpayers.

The concept was labeled the petro dollar. In effect, the United States, no longer able to back the dollar with gold, was now backing it with other people’s oil, and that necessity to keep control over those oil nations to prop up the dollar has dominated America’s foreign policy in the region ever since.”

Wars and Murders to Prop Up the Petro Dollar

Over time, America’s focus on finance over manufacturing led to a situation in which oil-producing countries were flush with U.S. cash, but the U.S. wasn’t manufacturing or selling anything that these nations wanted to buy. Europe made better cars and aircraft, and didn’t allow genetically engineered foods.

In 2000, Iraq demanded the right to sell their oil for euros, and in 2002, the United Nations agreed they could do so under the oil for food program. A year later, the United States re-invaded Iraq, Saddam Hussein was publicly lynched and Iraq’s oil could once again only be sold for U.S. dollars.

A similar scenario took place in Libya. In 2000, Muammar Gadhafi proposed the adoption of a new gold-backed currency, the gold dinar. He then announced that Libya’s oil would only be sold for gold dinars. As noted by Rivero:

“This move had the potential to seriously undermine the global hegemony of the dollar. French President Nicolas Sarkozy reportedly went so far as to call Libya a threat to the financial security of the world. So, the United States invaded Libya under the the guise of supporting a popular rebellion.

They brutally murdered Gadhafi — apparently because the object lesson of Saddam’s lynching had not been enough of a message — imposed a private central bank and returned Libya’s oil output to dollars.

According to General Wesley Clark, the master plan for the dollarization of the world’s oil nations included seven targets: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran and Venezuela …

What is notable about those original seven nations targeted by the U.S. is that none of them are members of the Bank of International Settlements. This is the private central bankers private central bank located in Switzerland.

That meant that those seven targeted nations were deciding for themselves how to run their nation’s economies, rather than submitting to the international private central bankers.

Now … the bankers gunsights are on Iran, which dares to have a government central bank and sell their oil for whatever currency they choose. The war agenda for Iran is … to force Iran’s oil to be sold only for dollars, and to force them to accept a privately owned central bank.

You have been raised by a public school system and a media that constantly assures you that the reasons for all these wars and assassinations are many and varied. ‘We’re bringing democracy to the conquered lands.’ We hear that a lot, when actually the U.S. hasn’t. The usual result of a U.S. overthrow is the imposition of a pro-business, pro-Wall Street, pro-U.S.-dictatorship.”

The Real Agenda of the Bankers

In closing, the real agenda of the central bankers is a simple one. It’s to rob people of their wealth and enslave them to this predatory system by creating a false sense of obligation.

“That obligation is false because the private central banking system, by design, creates more debt than money with which to pay the debt,” Rivero explains. “There is no way out, the way it’s set up. It’s impossible to escape as long as you’re playing by their rules. And you need to understand, private central banking is not science. It is a religion.

It’s a set of arbitrary rules created to benefit the priesthood, meaning the bankers, and is supported only because people believe this is the way it’s supposed to be. The fraud persists with often lethal results only because the people are brainwashed into believing that this is the way life is supposed to be and no alternative exists or should even be dreamt of.”

The Path to Freedom — Abolish Central Banks

The reality is, we do not “need” central banks. Not in the slightest. A country, or even individual states, can create their own currency and run their own banks, either without usury, or with very low interest rates. That’s the path to freedom, and all that is required is the decision to do so, and the guts to carry it though.

Ideally, captured nations around the world would break free all at once, as this would best guarantee everyone’s safety. As noted by Rivero:

“Private central banks do not exist to serve the people, the community or the nation. Private central banks exist to serve their owners to make them rich beyond the dreams of Midas, and all for the cost of ink, paper, the right bribe to the right official and the occasional assassination.

Behind all these wars and all these assassinations … lies a single policy of financial dictatorship. The private central bankers only allow rulers to rule on the promise that the people of a nation be enslaved to the private central banks.

Rulers who do not go along with that will be killed and their nation invaded by those other nations still enslaved to the private central banks. The bankers themselves don’t fight these wars. Their children are not in these wars.

This so-called ‘clash of civilizations’ you are being told about by the corporate media is really a war between banking systems, with the private central bankers forcing themselves on to the rest of the world, no matter how many millions must die for it …

Now we’re going into the third [world war] in the nuclear, bioweapon age. That is very dangerous. We have to ask ourselves. Are the private central bankers willing to risk incinerating the whole planet to feed their greed? Apparently.

So, you, as parents, as siblings, as spouses, need to ask yourself, ‘Do you really want to see your loved ones in uniform killed and crippled, all for a bank balance sheet? …

As long as private central banks are allowed to exist … there will be poverty, hopelessness, millions of deaths in endless world wars … The path to true world peace lies in the abolishment of all private central banking everywhere, and to return to state-issued, value-based currencies that allow nations and people to become prosperous through their own labor and development and efforts.”

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/10/jose...kers-wars/

The 'Invasion And Destruction' Of America As Prophesied By Henry Gruver And Dumitru Duduman And Revealed In Plans Of Russia And China Is Being Carried Out Before Our Eyes
By Brother Scott and All News Pipeline
October 20, 2023

As Christians we are children of light and of the day—living in an ever-more-darkening world—but if we walk about with our eyes closed, light does us no good at all. Our country has not seen war on its lands since the terrible Civil War in the mid-1800s. There were reports of a Japanese submarine spotted off the Los Angeles County, San Pedro coastline during the WWII timeframe, and supposedly sunk, but we have not had foreign military invaders on U.S. soil since the British were expelled during the Revolutionary War.

But this is soon to change—you need to know that, believe it as true, and make plans and preparations to live through it as a Christian.

Right to the point: One or more of the following list of possible events will be the prelude to an invasion by foreign forces—their effects being a distraction, chaos, and the weakening of law enforcement and military effectiveness, strength, and numbers. You should know that such an invasion is prophesied by Henry Gruver and Dumitru Duduman, as well as the revealed plans of Russia and China.

Possible events include:

1 - Something within the U.S. or staged somewhere else that becomes the catalyst for military action against others (consider events such as Japan/Pearl Harbor, Viet Nam/Gulf of Tonkin, 911/Iraq).

2 - A civil war breaking out in the U.S.

3 - Some form of nuclear or radiological device or suicide bombers being used to begin disruptions in our society.

4 - An electromagnetic pulse that permanently takes down all or large portions of our power grid.

5 - A catastrophic natural disaster of an intensity never before imagined.

6 - Our nation’s economy collapsing and its peoples having no money, food, jobs, or medical care and medications.

7 - A hard lock-down of the country due to any of these events or a new and lethal virus.

8 - Resistance to the visible arrival of U.N. forces for “humanitarian reasons”.

Things that will happen when an invasion begins—things that are normal military tactics and the first events when war erupts in a country:

1 - All or nearly all means of communication will be disabled (TV programming, landline phones, cell service, Internet, possibly satellite phone availability; and also, CB and ham-radio transmissions can be interfered with and tracked). You will not be able to communicate with family or friends by such means or others to find out what’s happening or coming your way. TV and radio broadcasts can be used for propaganda purposes benefitting those in control.

2 - Travel will be stopped by military and in other places by armed civilian roadblocks, some roads, bridges, and aircraft runways will be bombed, and fuel supplies confiscated and no longer available, including natural gas and propane. For many people, wherever they are when these more serious things suddenly happen will be where they will have to stay.

3 - The power grid will go down by one means or another. No electricity means no lights, no heat in the cold, no air conditioning when it is hot, no refrigeration for food, no water in the faucets, toilet tanks, or hot water heaters, city sewer services will fail to work, and no electric cars! These things will be especially bad for hospitals, and convalescent or retirement-home facilities.

4 - All food and medical supply deliveries will cease and local grocery and pharmacy supplies will run out—not within days but hours. What you have at home is all you will have to make-do with for an extended period of time. Oh, my! Can you imagine a city with no psych-drugs, bipolar or pain medications!

5 - The already bad people will begin ravaging markets, travelers, anyone found on the streets, and even homes. Many good people will descend into desperation and do things for food and water that they would not have before. (My YouTube message: When Good People Go Bad)

6 - When the invading military gets to your town, they will do anything they want to, take whatever they want, and show no mercy. Block-by-block and house-by-house searches will happen as they look for firearms, valuables, certain persons, women, food and fuel.

7 - Explosions, gunfire, screams for help, and fires will become commonplace. There will be no police or other emergency services—no agency will come to your aid.

8 - The cities will be the first to be affected, then the urban areas and eventually the rural regions as the invasion forces become available to spread out.

9 - Friends and even some family members will turn on one another because of these conditions and many will die.

Why this uncomfortable discussion? As you have heard for months now, the nations of the world are preparing for the next world war. China’s economy is decelerating from a recession into a very soon depression. Reports are that it cannot feed all its 1.4 billion citizens even one simple bowl of rice a day, and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has become very aggressive toward all her neighbors with not the least being neighboring Taiwan. Russia is rising up against the western nations and has the military prowess to defeat several substantial militaries all at once. In general terms—this bear just wants to be left alone but the US and NATO are poking it and others are throwing rocks at it from a distance.

What does the Bible say about the end of the age, which is somewhere at the 6,000-year mark since creation? We know from Daniel, from what Jesus taught us in the Gospels, and what John wrote in the book of the Revelation that the most terrible of times will arise leading to the death of several billion of the now 8 billion people on the earth, and an almost total destruction of the planet. A time like has never been nor will be ever again.

And yes, the USA is going to be a main target for several reasons as the judgment of God for its abominations is released. What are you and I to do before war comes home? What should we be doing right now and until then? We should be spiritually and physically preparing our hearts and minds and our homes and families. A man, parents, and all response-able-adults will give an account before God for having heard but not acted on such advance warnings as this one.

So where will your thoughts go when the news is heard that a war involving several powerful nations has just broken out? More to the point: What will you do when reports come-in that the United States of America has come under siege by one means or another especially on the day when we have been invaded by foreign military forces?

Will you:

- Sit in unbelief that it is true until you see our big cities being burned and bombed?

- Rush to the grocery store for the supplies you should already have only to be shocked by the several hundreds of people that got there ahead of you?

- On the way you notice your fuel tank is down to a quarter-tank and the gas stations already have lines 25 cars long—and you can’t spend the time in line for a 10-gallon limit—you need to get food first!

- Will you dash off to the bank to get your money out only to find the doors locked, the ATMs down, and all stores’ credit-card readers not working and you have no cash to speak of at home?

- Try calling family members in other states but there is no phone service?

- By The Way: Your extended family members will be coming to your place from the bigger cities—what will you do for food, and where will you get drinking water when the grid goes down (and it will go down if it hasn’t already)?

- Your spouse is spooked and your children are scared by the news and all the confusion—what do you say since you are, too? Your neighbors are running around the neighborhood looking for answers that you need also.

- Will you pack up your tent, dump all your stored food and water in the trunk, and rush the family into the SUV and head for a safer location—oh, but you don’t have any of these things and no gas to go?

When World War II broke out the U.S. stayed out of it still stinging from the effects of WWI—that is until Pearl Harbor was attacked because of the very same economic conditions we have imposed on Russia today. Almost overnight we went from a peace-time goods and services producing nation to a war-time economy making aircraft and tanks, bullets and bombs, and other needed military goods. We were a major military power capable of inserting huge amounts of equipment and manpower into two war-fronts: Europe and the far western-Pacific regions.

We can no longer effectively do that today but have become nearly flightless sitting ducks in a pond that many want for themselves—not the least of those is China’s Communist Government. We have these militarily powerful countries of China, Russia, Iran, Venezuela, and North Korea making final preparations to come to America—and not for our Frappuccino's and trips to our museums and national parks. You should watch both versions of the movie “Red Dawn” to wake up your mind and heart about what is coming.

Your mission, if you choose to accept it (Mr. Phelps), is to ready your spiritual and physical life and your household for what I have described today. Stop squandering your money on new technology, new cars, new entertainment means, and new clothes (unless they are warm-weather clothes and footwear), and (if you haven’t already begun) start this week to set aside the means for you and your family to face the sure and certain loss of the lifestyle you have known. People that see these dangers for what they are realize that when these things happen, when war comes home to our land, cities, and small towns, they will either be killed or men used for a time as workers and women as sex-slaves.

A small eyes-wide-open population in America is preparing to have to leave their homes and flee to a safe place with the basics of what they will need to survive. They have a large tent (tarp), plenty of blankets or sleeping bags, wood-burning cooking equipment, defensive weapons, stored food, some water and a good quality water filter, and they have plans on where they will go that is out of the reach of gangs and armies. And, by the way, how does one defend against a well-armed ground or airborne force(?) but by their well-developed spiritual life and trust in God! Have I described you and your household? I dearly hope so. After having done at least these very basic things then you can stand on the Word of God for what you will need that you could not have prepared for.

War is coming home and when it strikes it will be so fast that there will be no time and nothing left to go buy that you should have had already.

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/The_Inva...hesied.php

As The US Government Prepares 'False Flags' For America,  Americans Should Be Angry & Alarmed With Joe Biden Abusing The American People The Same Way He Abuses His Dogs
- America will be judged for the way it treats the Elderly, Children and Animals
By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die
October 20, 2023

With the terrorist regime 'occupying' Washington DC that knows nothing but endless death and wars, a 'two-party crime cabal' that has been at war for nearly my entire lifetime, despite having fooled some back in the 1960's and 70's that 'democrats' were somehow the 'party of peace and love,' they've shown their true faces to the world since, and it's one of hatred, death and war while they proclaim to the world they're 'benevolent'.

Spending well over $8 trillion taxpayer dollars on the US military and wars since 9/11 alone according to this Brown University 'Costs of War' study, oh what they could have done for 'humanity' had those dollars been spent upon America and the American people, rather than lining corrupt warlord pockets in Ukraine or in the Middle East or even here in the United States of America.

With joe biden now demanding $100 billion more taxpayer dollars to spend on endless wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, and what could start as a 'Holy War' in the Middle East quickly turning into an 'End Times Apocalyptic War' that goes global, remember that it is biden and the US taxpayers funding and arming both sides of that Middle East war, more proof the US govt is in a mad race to 'Armageddon.'

And with all of the madness unfolding now leading to the US govt preparing for a massive terrorist attack upon Washington DC, remember that we've got documented proof that the US government is more than happy to carry out what appear to be 'terrorist attacks' upon itself, blaming those attacks upon others, if it helps them to complete their political objectives, such as getting them into a new war that they so insanely yearn for. Remember, what you read below is documented fact that shows us the face of evil within our own government. 

Operation Northwoods was a proposed false flag operation that originated within the US Department of Defense of the United States government in 1962. The proposals called for CIA operatives to both stage and commit acts of terrorism against American military and civilian targets, blaming them on the Cuban government, and using it to justify a war against Cuba.

The possibilities detailed in the document included the remote control of civilian aircraft which would be secretly repainted as US Air Force plane, a fabricated 'shoot down' of a US Air Force fighter aircraft off the coast of Cuba, the possible assassination of Cuban immigrants, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, blowing up a U.S. ship, and orchestrating terrorism in U.S. cities. The proposals were rejected by President John F. Kennedy.

With President Kennedy then assassinated by the same treasonous scumbags that run America now because he wouldn't go along with their 'false flag terrorism' plans that would have allowed the US military to get into a war against a country because of the false flag terrorist actions the US government itself had carried out, we've reached the point where the entire 'deep state' and the whole US govt should be tried, convicted and executed for the crimes they committed back in 1963 and everything else they've done since then in selling out America and the American people. 

Think about this documented fact about 'Operation Northwoods' before we continue.:

The operation proposed creating public support for a war against Cuba by blaming the Cuban government for terrorist acts that would be perpetrated by the U.S. government. To this end, Operation Northwoods proposals recommended hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of false evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. Sound familiar in 2023? 

According to German 'Age of Enlightenment' philosopher Immanuel Kant, "We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." A phrase I remember hearing numerous times while growing up from a friend who'd decided to become a vegetarian in attempting to 'shame' others into her way of thinking, while none of us fell for her manipulation, I none-the-less agreed with Kant's statement overall, although not in the way my friend was trying to push in her attempt to turn all of us into vegetarians.

Perfectly explained in this 2007 piece over at the Gainesville Sun reporting that 'how people treat their animals reveals their true character,' or this 2014 LinkedIn piece which argued a Society should be judged by the way they treat their Elderly, Children and Animals, we don't have to look too far to see how America treats all of those groups as it insanely rushes into more wars, and it should tell us a lot.

Seen in this story of numerous, elderly pro-life women who've been arrested for protesting at abortion clinics facing 11 years in prison, or the insane globalists teaching young children that it's 'normal' to want to have their body parts chopped off if they think 'God' got their sex wrong while in their mothers wombs, we also see a perfect story about 'animal abuse' in this story and in this brief video on Tik Tok as well as this one over at Instagram featuring none other than joe biden 'kicking' his dog Commander in the head in an attempt to get him to 'move along.'

With one website asking why biden hasn't been charged with animal abuse for his actions that were caught on film, another claims maybe biden should get a gold fish after a series of at least 11 'biting events' involving his dogs, at least those that have been acknowledged. And with biden proving to America and the world that he's an 'animal abuser,' just think about what he thinks about us 'little people.' This pos should have NEVER gotten into a position of power. Briefly, from this American Military News story.:

A new report coinciding with a resurfaced video claims that President Joe Biden kicked and punched his German Shepherd dogs.

Pointing to a new report by Judicial Watch, a government watchdog group, Collin Rugg, co-owner of Trending Politics, tweeted a video that appears to show the president kicking his dog. Rugg captioned the video, “REPORT: President Biden has ‘mistreated’ his dogs by punching and kicking them according to sources close with Judicial Watch. Biden’s dogs are just like his son: Poorly trained.”

With Rugg continuing with:

Documents from the United States Department of Homeland Security, reveal injuries from attacks involving the dogs and Secret Service agents.

In an email exchange between a Uniformed Division officer and a November 3rd attack victim, the pair discussed an attack.

“My leg and arm still hurts. He bit me twice and ran at me twice.”

“What a joke [redacted] - if it wasn’t their dog he would already have been put down - freaking clown needs a muzzle - hope you get to feeling better.”

And several comments from this Tik Tok video show that people around the world see what's going on.

Dirt diggler: Arrest this pos for animal abuse

user8162184976616: Imagine if Trump kicked his dog on camera? You'd see it 24/7. Then again that's all the dirt they would have on him total.

JB: Now we know why his dogs are so aggressive and bite secret service agents.

And then when we compare the behavior of joe biden with his dogs to what we've seen all over the comment sections from ANP readers, many photographs that have been posted showing the outright love and affection they have for their own pets, it becomes extremely easy to see in ANP readers what Immanuel Kant spoke of, something totally absent from America's 'Commander in Chief'.

And thus with a madman pretending to be in charge here in America who 'kicks and punches' his own dogs according to reports and videos, allowing us to judge the 'heart' of joe biden and finding it empty and full of hatred, biden becomes a perfect 'front man' for the global wars we're being led into, a demon heartless and without a soul, full of anger and hatred, treating the American people the same we he does his dogs.

With biden making millions if not billions of dollars off of China according to this NY Post story after "China Used Their 'Elite Capture' Program To Buy 'China Joe' Away From America," as we reported in this August ANP story, "Never Has A President So Harmed America While Helping Another Country As Joe Biden."

Quite literally handing over huge chunks of America to a foreign nation which happens to be one of our enemies, as we'd warned in this March of 2023 story on ANP, "With The Communist Coup & Overthrow Of America All But Complete, A Full-Scale Invasion Is On With Illegal Border Crossings By Chinese Military-Aged Men Up 900% On Biden's Treason." And that 'invasion' of America through our Southern border has continued unabated since we'd written that story.

It's really very simple. If you are a 'Commander in Chief' of a country and one of your duties is to 'protect' the nation, you don't leave the gates wide open to those who intend to do us harm. If your duty is to PROTECT a country, or just home and your family for that matter, you don't leave the doors to 'your house' or wide open. You leave the gates wide open when you're intentionally inviting in danger.

Yet all of these wars, and a borderless America, fulfill the goals of the globalists and their 'New World Order.' With that new 'order' requiring wars to destroy what they, in their warped minds, no longer need, and all of the endless chaos they've initiated allowing them to carry out the destruction of the old so that they can bring in the new, and that 'new' looking a lot by their actions like a worldwide dictatorship and global tyranny, beware EVERYTHING in the coming days and weeks as the globalists rush to complete that 'new world order,' an 'order' which requires YOUR compliance to them, as they kick you to the ground, for them to reach their goals of worldwide slavery.

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/Biden_Ab...s_Dogs.php

The Tyranny Running America And The World Has Gone Way Beyond Orwell's Warnings From '1984' And 'Animal Farm' With 'High Tech' Enabling The Lynching And Annihilation Of America
By Scott S. Powell and All News Pipeline
October 22, 2023

Just a few generations ago, most Americans understood that George Orwell’s classics Animal Farm and 1984 were written as a warning about how freedom is lost to the tyranny and intolerance of totalitarianism.

Animal Farm and 1984 were particularly apt for teaching young people at a time when the shocking revelations about Nazism and Soviet communism that were coming out in the 1950s and 1960s were hard to digest. Most important, what these works revealed was that a defining feature of totalitarianism is mind control. First, propaganda warps and destroys people’s grasp on reality. Second, propaganda is designed to foster groupthink, conformity, and collectivism, which marginalizes critical and independent thinking.

Orwell described the scope of the totalitarian enterprise, noting in one section of 1984 that, “Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, and every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”

In 1984, Orwell wrote, “Who controls the past controls the future.” Orwell’s introduction of concepts and terms such as “newspeak, doublethink and thought police” are what we now experience as political correctness, misinformation, and cancellation. The analogs of “thought police” in 1984 are now the enforcers of political correctness and closed political narratives.

As Orwell notes, “the whole aim of newspeak and doublethink is to narrow the range of thought.” Political correctness has the same goal and that’s why its adherents are so intolerant -- seeking to silence, cancel, and delegitimize people with whom they disagree.

As it turns out, social media and information technology have great power to narrow the range of acceptable thought. Google, which controls 90% of Internet searches, utilizes an AI-driven search ranking that can manipulate not only consumer preferences but also election outcomes. According to Robert Epstein, a Harvard Ph.D. who has studied Google for more than decade, Google’s ability to manipulate its search ranking algorithms has the power to change the choices of 15% of undecided voters, more than enough to change many recent close election outcomes.

The COVID-19 lockdowns and the death of George Floyd in May 2020 created an environment of fear. And fear of going to the polls gave Democrat activists and lawyers the opportunity to change election laws and protocols in key swing states to expand the utilization of mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting, and lengthening vote counting deadlines. These initiatives enabled paid activists to manipulate voter registration and the vote count through fraudulent ballots -- undertaken to deny Donald Trump a second term.

Simultaneously, a full-blown cultural revolution came to America. What had been going on at many college campuses for decades came to cities across the country. With activism that created division, fear, and people turning on each other, it was as if Mao’s Chinese Communist Cultural Revolution 1960s and 70s had come to America.

First came hordes instigated by Antifa and Black Lives Matter smashing windows, looting, and burning down neighborhoods resulting in the destruction of $2 billion of urban property across America. Then, as if on cue or following a plan, marauding mobs appeared with ropes seeking to topple historic statues and monuments. Columbus and Confederate Civil War heroes were the first to go, but no one should doubt that the Founding Fathers -- the drafters of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution -- will be next. No history, no borders, no country.

Future historians may well look back and mark 2020 as the year America’s greatest threat began, for what happened that year and continued over the two and half years radically changed the country, effectively depriving American citizens of their First Amendment rights more completely than ever before, resulting in a questionable presidential election and the subsequent foreign invasion across the southern border.

In 2020 the main issues for Deep State influence and control of the American people were the COVID-19 pandemic and the November national election. The CIA, FBI, and DHS, which all had personnel who were hired by such social media companies as Google, Facebook, and Twitter, also had information-and-influence portals to these social media companies. However, directly influencing the election through censorship was perceived to be constitutionally problematic.

In June of 2020, the Election Integrity Partnership was formed by Alex Stamos, who was then a “research professor” at Stanford University, after resigning his role at Facebook as chief security officer in 2018. Stamos’ first endeavor at EIP was to meet with the Chris Krebs, the head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) at the Department of Homeland Security to identify what EIP needed to do to influence the upcoming election, particularly regarding censorship, which CISA was reluctant to do.

Although Stamos had a staff of some 120 at EIP, keeping up with flagging and censoring the tens of millions of social media posts deemed to have “misinformation” would be impossible. His solution was for Stanford’s EIP to undertake persuading all the major social media companies to change their customer terms of service policies to incorporate language about “delegitimization,” which would enable mass censorship and cancellation.

Within six weeks of getting its operation up and running, EIP succeeded in getting Facebook to change its terms of service to adopt delegitimization. On September 10th, Twitter also incorporated delegitimization into its terms of service. Other social media platforms followed suit.

Once the new terms of service that included delegitimization were in place, EIP had a two-fold approach to bring all social media companies into compliance to deplatform and cancel discussion/coverage of delegitimized topics: 1) Remind social media firms that there could be consequences from government regulatory agencies if they were noncompliant with their terms of service; and 2) Noncompliance with their written terms of service would also likely result in negative PR for the company.

There were slight changes to the words and subjects identified for delegitimization before and after the November national election. Mike Benz, Executive Director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, has itemized a partial summary of prohibited subjects for discussion on social media that would trigger cancellation or deplatforming: new election protocols and processes; issues and outcomes; mail-in ballots; early voting; drop boxes; “Stop the Steal”; “Sharpiegate”; Poll Watcher; Postal Service; dead voter rolls; and Antifa. And when the Hunter Biden laptop story broke in mid-October, it was immediately delegitimized.

By EIP’s own admission, Twitter was forced to cancel 22 million tweets that contained “misinformation” that violated the company’s terms of service prior to the November 2020 election. After the election, when many Americans felt disenfranchised and had many questions about perceived irregularities, they found that social media effectively checked discussion about election fraud, just as social media had done with COVID-19 policy abnormalities.

In many ways social media has taken the place of the town hall, the marketplace, and traditional media. Whatever the cause, whether government agencies who have direct portals to convey one-sided information to social media, or NGOs like the Election Integrity Partnership, when they block, cancel, or deplatform voices and information, the result is a narrowing of the range of acceptable thought. This censorship is of course a violation of First Amendment free speech. Worse, it is an assault on the Constitution and a betrayal of government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/Way_Beyo...l_Farm.php

It Will Be A Time Of Civil Chaos And The Collapse Of Civil Of Our Financial Imposition In 'Tribulation Wealth' The Physical Destruction And The Death Of Multiplied Millions
By Brother Scott and All News Pipeline
October 23, 2023

The topics that I present weekly are usually developed from the title that the Lord drops into my heart. A few weeks back the term “Tribulation Wealth” just popped up in my mind and I immediately understood what it was to be about—it is this: The world, our country, and our households are sliding more swiftly by the week toward what the Bible calls “great tribulation.”

It will be a time of civil chaos, the collapse of our financial systems (to include both our income sources and nearly all commerce in our land), an extreme scarcity of the needed things of life, (sadly) the physical destruction and the death of multiplied millions by natural calamities and by wars, and eventually the imposition of the antichrist system of buying, selling, and the demanded worship of false gods.

These things should not be news to you as many have talked about them for years. In this write-up I earnestly coach you to prepare your household for such things. Personally, I do not doubt that we are in the preceding time of growing “sorrows”, which means what is ahead at some point are 42 months of the greatest trouble that has ever been for all people on the earth.

The good news is that at the end of these 1260-1335 days—the Lord Jesus Christ returns to the earth to put an end to it all.

You may be wondering that with all this trouble and hardships and dangers how the concept of wealth for the common person (especially the hated Christian) can be planned for and prepared for [for] use during the tribulation! With believers in Jesus Christ being shut-out of whatever buying and selling that might be going on—what good is wealth? Well, the answer is that we must first redefine what wealth is during that time of great trouble. Tribulation wealth will not be in the traditional dollars or diamonds, or huge estates, or even a vault containing envious amounts of precious metals, although gold and silver will be useful, if one has any in the smaller denominations. Consider this as to how tribulation wealth will be defined during the near-future years of the dearth of nearly all things—everything except the air that we breathe:

Wealth: Anything that has utility and is capable of being appropriated or exchanged. Anything owned that has value to its owner or to others that are in need of that thing. Having accumulated something in terms of real goods or skills that are of value. Something possessed by one person that is needed for sustenance during hard times and that is also useful to others.

Barter: To trade by exchange of commodities or services rather than by the use of traditional money. The act or practice of trading goods or services for other goods or services.

Let me go over some examples of things that will be of value to you and to others during great trouble when there is no money and or we as Christians are expelled from society. Of things that are skills:

- Medical training and experience and having the basic supplies and equipment to help others (nursing, doctors, dentists, therapists)

- Skills and supplies to make or repair clothes, and other sewing needs

- Building skills—the ability and experience to build, expand, or repair basic shelters and having the tools and materials to do so

- Domestic farm animal and household pet-care experience

- How to dress a meat-animal for food (chickens, goats, cattle, foul, etc.)

- Security force and defense services; knowing how to use firearms, other defensive techniques, useful military training and experience

- Gas or diesel engine mechanic skills with the tools to do simple repairs

- Having the means to grow and prescribe herbs for health reasons

- Large-group food preparation experience (prepping, cooking, clean-up)

- Camping skills and experience instruction (campfire, cold-weather, security)

- Barbers, gardeners, wood choppers, knife sharpeners, gunsmiths, butchers, numismatic specialist, K-12 teachers, experienced child care, mid-wives, canning/jerkying/dehydrating food, etc.

For people that can do these kinds of things (and others not mentioned) [they] are parts of one’s wealth in a broken society. Whether trading for other things of value or provided with a charitable heart to the poor, if you have such skills prepare as much as you can right now to offer them when the time comes.

Of things that are possessions or tradable assets of value in a barter system:

- Small denominated gold and silver coinage, other hard and needed assets

- Laying chickens, portable incubator to hatch more chickens

- Cows and goats for milk, excess stock for meat

- Farm equipment for services to others

- Having the means to provide modest electric power by existing solar, wind, or man-powered generator equipment

- Having access to potable water via a well or other water purification means

- Ground coffee, large supplies of salt and sugar, large supply of aspirin, allergy or sleep aids, access to lots of firewood, a well-stocked seed vault

By now you should have a good idea about what I am speaking to under the caption “tribulation wealth” and might have already done a quick survey of your life. If you’ve recognized skills, possessions or assets that you now have that can help you and others in times of great need, I urge you to further develop those things (check your tools and equipment, upgrade some things, add more to your supplies, etc.). If you do not have anything to offer, then think about a significant need that will arise that you can fill and do what you can do now to be ready to serve in that way.

How does one use his or her tribulation wealth—things heretofore described?

Three suggestions:

- Trade it for something else that one needs but cannot otherwise get

- Exchange a physical possession for someone’s service or work (bring firewood or water, dig a hole, fix a shelter, deliver a meal, plow for a garden) or vice versa

- Give it away as you would a cup of water in Jesus’ name

With tribulation wealth in mind—recommendations and what to do quickly:

- If you have the professional training or a specialty skill, acquire the tools and equipment needed to do that work or service (barber, seamstress, cook, wood-cutter, builder, etc.); perhaps pickup up-to-date manuals

- Add to your needed things a back-up of all critical tools, equipment or supplies (Prepper’s motto: 2=1, 1=0) and refresh or upgrade your training

- In the case of needing to evacuate your home, have your tools, equipment and other supplies assembled in a BOT (bug-out-tub or suitcase or crate).

Now I’ve said a lot today that I know was hard to keep up with. But all you need to remember and act on are these questions to ask yourself: What skills do I have or what can I do that will be useful when serious trouble or especially when great tribulation begins—what do I have to offer? What 1 or 2 things can I provide that will help others and perhaps be a source of return-provision for me and my loved ones? Without money, what can I do or have that will be tradable for other things that I might need for me and mine?

After answering these questions then prepare now for what you can do; have things ready for that day when money fails, stores close, chaos and danger reigns in our land, and might even you end up in a small refugee camp somewhere in the mountains where the things that you are prepared to do will provide a blessing to others and maybe even some form of useful payback for you.

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/It_Will_...llapse.php

Crescendo Is Building To World War 3 - We Are On The 'Knife's Edge Of Nuclear War' And America Is Not Prepared To Take on The Hostile Nations That Will Side With Iran
By Susan Duclos - All News Pipeline
October 23, 2023

The Middle East has always been a powder keg, but since the Hamas terrorist attack against Israel, and Israel's ongoing response, we are closer to WWIII than at any time in our history.

No matter ones personal feelings regarding the War between Israel and Hamas, a group America designated a terrorist group on October 8, 1997, along with 13 other groups, as shown at the State Department list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, no one wants to see WWIII, which inevitably would turn into a nuclear war.

The fact is nuclear powers are taking sides, which has happened before without resulting in a world war, but this time we are seeing attacks against U.S. embassies and U.S. military bases in the Middle East. We see our warships being deployed, as well as additional troops and missile systems, into an area on the brink of explosion.

As a quick disclaimer: Personally I don't think we should have military bases in foreign countries, after all, we do not allow other nations to do so in America.

That is a discussion for another day though as we have so much happening, all at once in the Middle East, that we need realize that war barreling it's way towards us like an out-of-control train.

Below we will take a look at how fast that train is moving.

U.S. embassies in Beirut, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Lebanon, and others have seen attacks, or bomb threats, while multiple others nations are seeing massive demonstrations, many violent. U.S. military bases and/or soldiers in Iraq and Syria have been attacked.

There are travel advisories from the U.S. State Department for Iraq, which says "do not travel," and as of October 23, a "worldwide caution advisory" for U.S. citizens traveling abroad.

More worrisome is the amount of military force being deployed to the Middle East, not only by the U.S. but by china as well. Of course we are told by China that their warships are there on "routine escort missions."

Both the U.S., China  and Israel, are nuclear powers.

Perhaps the most concerning bit of new is that the U.S. is not only sending more missile systems to the Middle East but we are deploying additional troops. While our support is understandable since more than 30 American citizens were killed in the Hamas attack in Israel, it is a very bad sign when we start accruing troops in the Middle East, especially while a war is raging.

    The Pentagon overnight said it will send two of its most powerful weapons against missiles to the Middle East and prepare an unspecified number of troops to deploy overseas after “recent escalations by Iran and its proxy forces” continue to threaten a wider war in the region.

    The U.S. will send a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system and additional Patriot air defense missile system battalions "to locations throughout the region," Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said in a statement, adding that he has placed an “additional number” of American troops on prepare-to-deploy orders.

    Austin did not say how many battalions would be sent or exactly where they would be going, nor did he specify the number of troops under new orders—the U.S. has already sent two aircraft carriers, their support ships and about 2,000 Marines to the Middle East, Reuters reported.

With the war not just between Israel and Hamas, as the U.S. has intercepted missiles coming from Yemen, and Hamas is in discussions with Iran, who controls both Hamas and Hezbollah in Syria.

    Lebanon's Hezbollah has been exchanging fire with Israel across the border for days in the deadliest escalation since they fought a major war in 2006, threatening to expand a conflict between Israel and Palestinian group Hamas.

    Backed by Iran, Hezbollah has said it is ready to help when the time comes in the war between Israel and Hamas, which is also backed by Tehran. Sources said last week Hezbollah's attacks so far had been designed to be contained and so avoid another major war.

We also have Iran now warning that the Middle East is about to go "out of control."

That is a lot to happen in just 16 days, and this war is projected to go on for months, with some estimates up to 18 months.

SLEEPER CELLS IN AMERICA.....

The other day I wrote about the danger lurking right around the corner, meaning sleeper cells in America, waiting for the call to attack Americans in cities across the U.S.

Today we see Representative Kevin McCarthy, the former Speaker of the House, expressing concern about the same issue.

    Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., warned Sunday of potential terror "sleeper cells" in the United States amid the Israel-Hamas war.

    Throwing support behind Rep. Tom Emmer, R-Minn., for his old job as the lower chamber of Congress has remained without a speaker for three weeks, McCarthy said that whoever takes on the role must prioritize border security. Appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press," McCarthy pointed to a new report released by U.S. Customs and Border Protection that shows 18 people on the FBI's terror watch list were apprehended at the southern border in September, accounting for the more than 160 caught so far this year.

As a side note, Emmer must be defeated, he is another RINO.

Lora Ries, director of the Border Security and Immigration Center at The Heritage Foundation, agrees with McCarthy that sleeper cells are a direct threat to America.

    Absolutely," Lora Ries, director of the Border Security and Immigration Center at The Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital this week when asked if the Hamas attack on Israel serves as a warning that the southern border with Mexico is not secure and is vulnerable to national security threats.

    "Particularly the 1.7 million known ‘gotaways,' those who evaded the Border Patrol because they didn't want to be fingerprinted because they're either known or suspected terrorists themselves, convicted aggravated felons, smuggling drugs or some combination thereof.

    "So, when you combine 1.7 million with the 7.4 million CBP has encountered, we have to assume that the sleeper cells of terrorists are here inside the U.S., and Congress needs to wake up and preempt."

We have to ask how many crossed without being caught? Aside from those trying to cross now, we have huge Middle Eastern/Muslim populations in America already, with no idea how many "sleeper cells" are already amassed. The last numbers available are from 2017 as to the Muslim population living in America, and that was 3.45 million, and while President Trump banned many from terrorist connected countries, which the media labeled a "Muslim ban," yet only covered a small percentage of Muslims worldwide, Biden rescinded those bans, so we have no idea how many more from the Middle East have crossed our borders over the last nearly three years.

A sleeper cell is defined as "a group of operatives, spies or terrorists, living in secret among a targeted community waiting for instructions or an opportunity to act," by Dictionary.com.

Now I am not suggesting for a minute that all Muslims are part of sleeper cells, but America has previously foiled attacks by Hezbollah, here in America.

BOTTOM LINE

We know the situation in the Middle East will get far worse before it gets better, if, and that is a big IF, it gets better at all, and we also know the Biden regime is all in, which puts America in the cross hairs, especially if we put boots on the ground to fight in the Middle East.

The bottom line here is that we are on the knife's edge of nuclear war, and many hostile nations will side with Iran. The government will be too busy trying to survive, so no help will be one the way. In an interview with Mike Adams of Natural News and Brighteon,  Steve Quayle says in the only video below, "all the world events are pointing to a crescendo that's going to build," taking us to WWIII.

Americans need to be prepared, and we have seen some great suggestions in the comment section over the past few days.

Big Moe mentioned "Alternative forms of communication will be critical. Satellite phones. Radios for getting information ( locally) and transceivers to communicate."

Another comment I saw this morning from El Gato Blaco, stating "Good article about stocking beans & bullets. Have been prepping since about 2014 when a dearly departed friend showed me how totally unprepared I was. Immediately bought a 2 year dehydrated supply which I still have and more. Making sure to have access to drinking water is one of the most underrated preps. I had two backup hand-pump wells drilled on two separate properties."

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/Knife_Ed...ar_War.php

Biden Regime 'Rattled' As Confluence Of Crises Poses 'Historical Danger' - When SHTF, Americans Will Have To Survive Without Government Help
By Susan Duclos -  All News Pipeline
October 25, 2023

Since Joe Biden started occupying the White House we have seen a series of events that has destabilized the world itself.

From the Russia/Ukraine war, to increased nuclear capable missile tests in Iran, the disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal where we left Americas, and allies behind, China & Russia's strengthening of their anti-American alliance, China's rapid expansion of their nuclear force, along with their moves concerning Taiwan, and the Hamas attack against Israel, and Israel's ongoing response, White House officials are starting to buckle under the pressure.

How do we know this? Because these officials are speaking to the left-leaning Axios to tell us how unnerved the White House is.

None of this happened under the Trump administration, but once the Biden regime took over America's foreign affairs policy, it is like the world itself is rushing towards World War III.

Now we are seeing via  a report from Axios, after speaking with multiple White House officials, that the regime is "rattled"  over this "this confluence of crises" which they say "poses epic concern and historic danger."

    Behind the scenes: Officials tell us that inside the White House, this was the heaviest, most chilling week since President Biden took office just over 1,000 days ago.

        • Former Defense Secretary Bob Gates — who ran the Pentagon under presidents of both parties, George W. Bush and Barack Obama — tells us America is facing the most crises since World War II ended 78 years ago.

Critics of Joe Biden would point to his weakness, not only looking like a frail old man that publicly stumbles  and falls often, and mumbles through most of his speeches, but his willingness to weaken the U.S. military strength in the name of "wokeness," while leaving our offensive and defensive capabilities limited because we have sent so tens of billions in equipment to Ukraine since February 2022, and now to Israel.

While helping our allies has always been part of America's foreign policy, to do so to the point of sacrificing the American military's readiness for combat, leaves the U.S. as weak as Biden appears to be every time he makes a public appearance.

More from Axios:

    Vladimir Putin meeting in China this week with Xi Jinping to further strengthen their anti-America alliance. In a new Foreign Affairs article that top officials are sharing, Gates argues that both leaders believe America and other big democracies "are past their prime and have entered an irreversible decline." Putin and Xi sniff weakness and are activating on many fronts, top administration officials tell us.

        • This Reuters headline says it all: "Russia says it is coordinating Middle East policy with China."

Read the rest at Axios. The fact is that when the people at the highest levels of government are "rattled" aka scared of what is happening, not just regarding one issue, one war, but global issues, while at home the economy is putting people in food lines, then we know now is the time to prepare to sav yourself because the government certainly isn't going to be able to help you.

DAMAGE AMERICA MAY NEVER RECOVER FROM

Externally we are watching the world getting ready to explode in war as nuclear countries take sides in the ongoing wars, and America loses its strength in the world, no longer accepted as the "leader of the free world."

Other external factors include:

• Escalation of Attacks Against U.S. Troops in Middle East

• Yemen’s Houthi army emerges as a major threat to Israel and US

• Drone attacks on American bases injured two dozen U.S. military personnel

• North Korea on track to overpower US nuclear defenses

• North Korea raises the specter of nuclear strike over US aircraft carrier's arrival in South Korea

• US Identifies Six Scenarios That Could Prompt China to Invade Taiwan

• Biden’s minimalist Middle East policy is a stunning failure

Internally we have the majority of Americans living paycheck to paycheck, food 20% more than it was in 2020, inflation causing people to strip their savings and accrue massive credit card debt, and a lack of trust in our government.

Unprecedented crime in liberal cities from one end of the country to the other, war protests, hate crimes, racial hoax crimes, all weakening the nation from within.

• Americans' Weak Economic Ratings Slip Further in September

• Americans ran up $105 billion in credit card interest last year alone

• Americans Are Burning Through Savings To Keep Biden’s Economy Afloat, Experts Say

• Fed up Americans leaving crime-ridden cities, blame Biden

• Encounters with Middle Eastern migrants up at border: CBP

The point here is America is at its weakest point in history, and if SHTF, it will be up to American citizens to survive without government help.

WHEN SHTF.......

Globally sh*t is already hitting the fan, and for many within the U.S. the same thing is happening as they wonder if they are going to be able to pay their monthly bills and eat, with some elderly having to chose between their medications and food.

That should be a crime. There is no reason on earth that people who have worked their whole lives paying into social security, to now have the cost of living so high they cannot afford to live comfortably because of the high cost of living.

That is a story for another day though, as we have to accept that when SHTF here in America, whether civil unrest, a terrorist attack, or outright war on U.S. soil because America is seen to be so weak, the government, and the depleted U.S. military under Biden, won't be able to help American citizens.

It will be American gun owners, preppers, farmers and ranchers that will be the backbone of America.

According to the American Gun Facts website, "46% of American households own at least one firearm according to a study by the University of Chicago. 32% of Americans say they personally own a firearm according to the 2021 National Firearms Survey. This means that more than 81.4 million Americans own guns. This number only includes adults over 18."

As of 2021there were 436.4 million guns in the United States, and in 2023, the number of firearms in America is around 466 million due to record breaking sales during the pandemic.

American gun owners will be our "militia" when all hell breaks loose. They'll be our defense force, for lack of a better term. Just as our farmers and ranchers, will be our food sources, along with the preppers that have stocks saved up for just this purpose, and have bartering items.

We went over this the other day, but since events continue to worsen almost daily, within the country and around the world, we need to once again encourage personal protection for those that are uncomfortable with firearms.

Starting with the non-lethal, the products below are affordable and have some very good reviews.

Pepper Sprays: Note - This seems to be best used for outdoors, but not advisable for indoor use unless absolutely necessary as some of the reviews were clear that the rate of dissipation ended up affecting the user as well as the attacker.

Out of all the products researched, when it came to pepper sprays, the SABRE brand received the best reviews with 4 and 5 stars.

Stun Guns

Tasers: (Note- Tasers are a little more expensive, but rather than just stunning the attacker from up close, they fire barbs attached by wires to batteries, which will incapacitate them temporarily.)

Batons, Bats & Tactical Pens:

While many ANP regular readers already have a good stock of foods, getting anything that is missing, or that needs topping off, or just doubling what you have, seems to be getting more critical by the day.

I won't blow smoke up your bum and claim that we know when or how everything is going to fall apart, we don't. But from what we see in the comments, chat forums and social media, it is like everyone just "knows" something big is coming and we all need to be prepared to deal with the consequences of whatever happens.

Get right with God. Be Prepared.

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/Biden_Re...attled.php

America Has Fallen In To The Mouth Of Marxist Madness As The Next Globalist War Has Been Launched Into The War To Deceive And Destroy Christians And Americans
By J.B. Shurk and All News Pipeline
October 25, 2023

At the beginning of October, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán denounced the European Union’s 1984-inspired manipulation of language: “Brussels is creating an Orwellian world in front of our eyes. They buy and supply weapons through the European Peace Facility. They want to control the media through the Media Freedom Act. We didn’t fight the communists to end up in 1984!” The “Peace Facility” is responsible for transferring billions of dollars worth of artillery and ammunition to Ukraine. The “Media Freedom Act” gives European bureaucrats extraordinary powers to censor any speech or ideas they dislike.

Although Orbán is absolutely correct in his assessment of European madness, there is no sign that his warning will have any corrective effect. The Eurocrats are so steeped in self-deluding propaganda that it would be not at all surprising to see them pull another page straight out of 1984 by carving on one of their marble government buildings the same three slogans that adorned Orwell’s “Ministry of Truth”: “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” Such is the depth of the rabbit hole into which the European hive mind has descended that too many ordinary citizens would miss the depressing irony.

As if recognizing that Europe’s embrace of censorship, surveillance, and social control inconveniently mirrors Orwell’s condemnation of Big Brother and Big Government to perfection, the British “ruling class” attempted this month to “cancel” Orwell by using an article in The Telegraph to accuse the prophetic genius of being “sadistic, misogynistic, homophobic, and sometimes violent” — in other words, someone who should not be “tolerated” and no longer “deserves” to be read. If “cancelling” the author who warned the world about such forms of slithery government tyranny is not “peak Orwell,” then the crazy train still barreling down the tracks promises to be a doozy.

Americans, of course, are similarly under siege from an Orwellian deep state that manipulates the public by distorting history and undermining the meaning of words. In a nation that celebrates George Floyd as a hero, clings to the “Hands up, don’t shoot” lie as a sacred “truth,” and blames Hillary’s election loss on Russian bots, propaganda is king.

The U.S. government fights racism by institutionalizing racial preferences. It supports Black Lives Matter and Antifa domestic terrorists while locking up American patriots as “domestic enemies.” It replaces impartial justice with “social justice” and equality under the law with “equitable” special privileges. “Climate change” communism kills property rights. Meme-makers are imprisoned, but Russia collusion hoaxers are not. Gene-altering serums are called “vaccines.” And generations of judges have replaced the U.S. Constitution with their own postmodern revisions.

When President Trump was elected in 2016, movie theaters in cities across the country actually ran the 1984-released movie version of Orwell’s masterpiece, starring John Hurt and Richard Burton, as some sort of cinematic censure of Trump’s rise to power. At the time, the spectacle seemed bemusing. Trump — the outsider — was clearly beholden to no Big Brother deep state.

Far from participating in the insidious programs of “political correctness” that 1984 so effectively damns as the building blocks of totalitarianism, Donald Trump has always been one of the most plainly spoken — and, at times, brutally frank — Americans to take the world stage. Instead of hiding behind riddles, insinuations, and other verbal contortions, President Trump tells anyone who is listening exactly how he feels. Yet the same Marxists whom Orwell criticized used Orwell to criticize their political boogeyman. It was confounding.

Seven years later and the language games have just gotten worse. Anytime a majority of the American people express a preference for something at odds with the permanent “ruling class” occupying D.C. — curbing illegal immigration, profligate government spending, and endless wars, as examples — the U.S. government rejects the public’s wishes as “threats to democracy.” The government insists that its bureaucrats represent the people’s will while expressing dismay that the people’s will could differ from that of the bureaucrats. In other words, an “oligarchy” of “elites” now calls itself a “democracy,” and majority public opinion is ridiculed as “anti-democratic.”

Pretending that authoritarianism is “democratic” makes it much easier to assist dictators overseas who do the same thing. While Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shuts down opposition political parties, church services led by priests pleading for peace, and the prospect of free speech, the U.S. government claims that support for Ukraine is support for “Western values.” While the Gazan people overwhelmingly support Hamas terrorist attacks on helpless Jewish civilians, European and American leaders falsely claim that their bloodlust is actually “peaceful” in nature.

While Iran’s theocratic dictatorship threatens Israel’s existence and supports the torture and killing of girls accused of violating Shia law, Barack Obama, John Kerry, and Joe Biden have spent the last fifteen years doing the murderous ayatollah’s bidding. In Orwellian fashion, tyranny is defended as “democratic” and “Western” — which should serve as a warning to Western citizens of the direction their “leaders” are heading.

Of course, if Orwell prophetically captured the malicious spirit of our present age, it was Aldous Huxley who foresaw its moral degradation. He understood that promiscuity, drug addiction, and other pleasure-seeking obsessions are not only gateways to eroding religious conviction but also the perfect tools for any authoritarian government seeking to keep the public mentally enslaved and subdued. If a free-thinking individual can be relegated to a hallucinogenic state of narcotic dependency, then that person will never again possess the free will to challenge anything.

If adolescents can be taught to embrace a revolving door of sexual partners while joyfully “shouting their abortions,” then they can be prevented from ever creating stable families of their own. Healthy marriages produce happy families with thoughtful children who, in turn, grow to be self-sufficient, productive adults. Governments that require their citizens to be obedient are strongest when those citizens remain dependent upon government for life. Drug-addled, psychologically confused adults who are incapable of taking care of their own families are the perfect candidates for government enslavement.

In Brave New World, Huxley describes a tyrannical society where sex has been stripped of love, intimacy, and its childbearing purpose. In a scene where an authority figure attempts to explain the West’s forgotten notions of morality to a group of astonished children, he explains: “[E]rotic play between children had been regarded as abnormal (there was a roar of laughter); and not only abnormal, actually immoral (no!): and had therefore been rigorously suppressed.” In a world where babies are “decanted” in “hatcheries,” women use abortion to end pregnancies, and people are fed a diet of pills to keep them docile and compliant, the government has no trouble maintaining control over people’s lives.

Compare Huxley’s dystopian world in which the drug Soma is used to tranquilize the public to our own world today. Recent figures show that nearly a quarter of Scotland’s adult population is being prescribed anti-depressants, while fifteen percent of Americans are being similarly prescribed some form of powerful selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors known to cause dangerous side-effects — including loss of sexual function, insomnia, brain fog, suicidal ideation, and self-harm. In the U.S., fifty percent of the population over twelve has used illegal drugs. Overdose deaths have tripled since 2000. And fifty-five million American adults currently use marijuana. Whether through alcohol, opioids, marijuana, or hallucinogens, Americans are walking around in a Soma-like haze.

We are in the mouth of Marxist madness where Orwell’s “Ministry of Truth” and Huxley’s recipe for enfeebling the masses in a hedonistic stupor have combined to usher in a twisted new era of Western totalitarianism. The real danger, though, is that their dire warnings will be accepted as fait accompli.

Instead, they should be used as stark rallying cries for resisting government tyranny.

Furthermore, I consider that Marxist Globalism must be destroyed.

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/America_...adness.php

Renewed Calls From Left To Ban AR-15 Just As The Globalists Are Rushing Head First Into Full-Scale Global Tyranny And World War 3 - Maine Massacre Used To Hide Biden Family Crimes
- The Globalists Are Setting Americans Up For The Kill
By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die
October 26, 2023

Sure enough, just as pointed out last night by several ANP readers, it didn't take long for the calls from the left to outlaw and ban the AR-15 following the devastating mass shooting in Lewiston, Maine that led to the deaths of at least 22 with more than 60 injuries.

With this shooting having all of the earmarks of an MKUltra, mind-controlled event, with the shooter, Robert Card, a US Army Reservist and firearms instructor who was recently hospitalized after 'hearing voices' and threatening to blow up a US Army Training facility, take note that this is all happening as joe biden and the globalists rush head first into World War 3.

Also happening at a time when the Middle East is on fire and ready to explode, take note that this attack happened at a time when President Donald Trump recently warned the United States is more vulnerable from terror attacks from the inside of the USA than ever before, though the reason for that warning according to Trump is America's wide open southern border, not someone who was supposed to be serving his country.

And with joe biden, of course, wasting no time at all calling for 'gun control,' as mentioned previously, this latest mass shooting definitely appears to have been set up by 'the powers that be' as they wage another attempt to outlaw the AR-15 and other 'assault weapons' with the gunman still on the loose and the state of Maine on lockdown. Briefly, from this Daily Mail story.:

The person of interest in the Maine mass shooting that left at least 22 people dead has been identified as a trained firearms instructor who spent two weeks in a mental health facility over the summer.

Robert Card, 40, is the subject of a police manhunt in connection to the massacre in the city of Lewiston last night.

Card is from Bowdoin, Maine - a town with a population just over 3,000 - and is believed to be an Army Reservist stationed out of Saco.

Card grappled with mental health issues, recently reporting 'hearing voices' and threatening to shoot up the military training base.

Over the summer, he was committed to a mental health facility for two weeks.

A criminal background check retrieved by local media suggested that in 2007, he was charged with a misdemeanor offence for driving under the influence, which he was found guilty of.

Yet as two of the top-voted comments on that Daily Mail story pointed out, millions of guns are in criminal hands and not a single workable proposal to seize them, just plans to disarm the innocent civilians that need them to protect themselves against the criminals. How do you propose to disarm the armed criminals? and If the AR-15 is banned, the disturbed will use another model - what's the point?

And sure enough, the 'legacy media' immediately attempted to tie Robert Card to President Donald Trump and Conservatives.

As if they're attempting to set up their future moves, while demonizing President Trump and Conservatives in the process, check out the following lines from the same Daily Mail story we quoted above.:

His X account, now suspended, revealed that he followed and liked posts by several prominent conservative pundits, including Donald Trump Jr., Tucker Carlson and Dinesh D'Souza.

In March, he liked a post by Donald Trump Jr. that read, 'Given the incredible rise of trans/non-binary mass shooters in the last few years… by far the largest group committing as a percentage of population… maybe, rather than talking about guns we should be talking about lunatics pushing their gender affirming bullsh** on our kids?'

He also liked a post by Dinesh D'Souza that read: 'Ban assault weapons? Well, cars kill more people than guns do. But we blame the drivers. We don't ban large or fast cars. We understand that cars, like guns, don't act by themselves. The blame lies with the people who operate these mechanical devices. Common sense 101.'

Yet as we've reported previously on ANP, the globalists love carrying out psychological warfare upon Americans, and this latest mass shooting in the US has immediately been 'weaponized' in an attempt to get politicians to go along with their sinister plans. From another Daily Mail story titled "Latest mass shooting horror in Lewiston Maine that leaves at least 22 dead brings renewed calls to ban America's favorite gun the AR-15" within which they warn "Tuesday's mass shooting at a bowling alley and bar in Maine is leading to liberal activists calling for some kind of ban on assault rifles."

There are renewed calls for AR-15 rifles to be banned in the US as the weapon is was used by the gunman in Lewiston, Maine, who killed at least 22 people and injured dozens more on Tuesday night.

The weapons have been used in massacres that have horrified the nation, including one that left 10 people dead at a grocery store in Buffalo and another where 19 children and two teachers were shot to death in Uvalde, Texas.

The gun first came to national prominence when it was thought to have been used by deranged gunman Adam Lanza when he massacred 20 children and six teachers at Sandy Hook Elementary school in Connecticut in 2012.

The weapon used by Lanza, was an 'AR-15-style rifle' which was made by Remington known as a Bushmaster.

Since then, activists have used images of the weapon to symbolize the need for gun control, arguing that the assault rifle a weapon of war and that there is no need for members of the public to own them.

Gun violence prevention activist Shannon Watts epitomized the reaction from activists tweeting repeatedly on Tuesday night: 'It's harder to buy Sudafed than an AR-15 in Maine.'

So since the US Army and law enforcement knew about Robert Card's mental health issues, why was he even allowed to purchase and own guns, as well as being a firearms instructor for the US Military? As numerous ANP readers had pointed out in previous comment sections, something here stinks to high heaven. And it's NOT the 2nd Amendment.

With America under joe biden and the globalists quickly moving towards a tyranny, we've warned numerous times previously on ANP about false flag events 'weaponized' to complete the globalists objectives and as this State of the Nation story points out, this is looking more and more like a 'staged event' with this happening at the same time as Mike Johnson was elected Speaker of the House. From that story.:

Oh really, the very day conservative Freedom Caucus member Mike Johnson is elected Speaker of the House, the homicidal Deep State gun control freaks stage a mass shooting in the independent-voting state of Maine where gun ownership is very common throughout the rural areas.

Now that a seemingly authentic conservative hard-liner and serious gun rights advocate is Speaker, the New World Order globalist cabal just had to send him this ugly message during his first full day on the job!

“Mike Johnson entered Congress in 2017 and in 2020 helped lead the effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Father of four likes taking his family to the gun range, go hunting and is a football fanatic who supports Louisiana State University…..”

DISTRACTION ~ DISTRACTION ~ DISTRACTION

You know that, whenever the NWO perps pull off these highly dramatic and totally captivating mass shootings, there’s something very BIG going on that the cabal needs to distract the entire body politic from.

And quite interestingly, this mass shooting happened the very same day a story went viral about how the FBI halted an investigation into the 'biden crime family corruption,' despite having more than 40 confidential sources who provided them with criminal information relating to Joe Biden, James Biden, and Hunter Biden.

With biden clearly putting a stop to that investigation himself, if we no longer have a POTUS who follows the rule of law, what does that mean for the rest of us? And with all of this also happening at a time when the world is blindly rushing into World War 3, can you imagine them now going for American's guns in the coming days? It appears that they're setting us up for the kill.

So as Thomas Jefferson pointed out years ago in words that still hold true, "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms, is as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government". And that warning is as true today, or even more true, than it was nearly 250 years ago. 

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/Maine_Ma...Crimes.php

Biden Says The U.S. Will Build A “New World Order”
By Mac Slavo
October 24, 2023

The current system of totalitarian control is failing as the slave class slowly figures out the game, and the masters know it. Joe Biden said that the United States-led world order has “sort of run out of steam,” but Washington will shape the “New World Order” system that will replace it.

If you think a new system designed by the sociopaths that created the current system will be better, you’re delusional. The new system, or new world order, will remove the illusion of freedom and ensure permanent inescapable slavery for all but a few human beings on this planet. The current head ruler,  Joe Biden, told supporters on Saturday that the U.S. has the opportunity “to do things.”

Leaders in Moscow and Beijing, however, have argued otherwise. According to a report by RT, while speaking at a campaign reception in Washington, Biden bragged about how he convinced Japan and South Korea to send financial aid to Ukraine, and how he signed a rail and ports deal with the European Union, India, and Saudi Arabia at the G20 summit in New Delhi last month.

“So, I think we have an opportunity to do things if we’re bold enough and have enough confidence in ourselves, to unite the world in ways that it never has been,” Biden declared. “We were in a post-war period for 50 years where it worked pretty damn well, but that’s sort of run out of steam. Sort of run out of steam. We need a new, new world order in a sense,” he continued.

The U.S. is flailing as it attempts to fund two separate wars and control the slave class domestically. With Beijing expanding its nuclear arsenal and modernizing its military, President Xi Jinping has referred to the U.S.-led West as “declining” on multiple occasions, and hailed the emergence of a “multipolar world,” in which international relations are governed by laws and treaties, rather than U.S.-enforced “rules.”

The ruling class is continuing to decide how many rights other human beings are entitled to. That, in and of itself, is slavery. We all need to start to see this system for what it is and the damage it has done to humanity.

“We proceed from the fact that all people are equal, everyone has the same rights, the rights and freedoms of one country and one people end where the rights and freedoms of another person or of an entire state start. This is how a multipolar world should gradually be born,” Putin told the Chinese network.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/10/mac-...rld-order/

Biden Election Strategy: ‘Let’s Fight Three Wars at Once!’
By Ron Paul, MD
October 24, 2023

President Joe Biden announced last week that the United States would be funding – and possibly fighting – three wars in three different parts of the world at the same time. It is an ambitious foreign policy for a president who doesn’t even seem to be able to express a coherent thought without the help of a teleprompter.

Nearly every word of Biden’s speech was untrue, including the preposterous suggestion that “American leadership is what holds the world together. American alliances are what keep us, America, safe.”

US interventionism in Ukraine for over ten years and in the Middle East for decades has brought those two regions to the brink of an explosion unlike anything seen before. And if that is not enough, Biden’s neocons are also determined to take us to war with China over Taiwan. The world is literally falling apart in front of us as Biden claims we are the only thing holding it together!

After a brutal attack on Israel by Hamas earlier this month, Israel declared war not just on the terrorists who attacked its territory, but on the entire population of Gaza itself. Israel’s policy of collective punishment – razing Gaza to the ground – has inflamed Muslims from the Middle East to Asia to Western capitals. The anger rages more fiercely than we have seen in decades, perhaps since the founding of Israel in 1948.

Yet instead of trying to help facilitate a ceasefire and a peaceful solution, Biden has poured gasoline onto the fire, sending two US carrier groups and at least 15,000 troops, while threatening war on Lebanon, Iran, and Syria if they intervene in Israel’s war on the Palestinians. What might Russia do if the US attacks Russian forces in Syria or Russia’s allies in Tehran?

Biden also repeated the line that “Israel has the right to defend itself.” While that may be true, it is not Israel defending itself. It’s the US government intervening to defend Israel. And as the entire Muslim world rages against Israel over the destruction of Gaza, how do we think they will feel about us as the financiers and facilitators of that destruction?

By dragging the United States into this war, President Biden has planted the seeds of innumerable 9/11-style blowback attacks on the US. Yet he has the audacity to claim that all of this is keeping us safe.

Recent polls show that most Americans disagree with Biden. A CBS/YouGov poll taken last week shows that the majority of Americans oppose sending weapons to Israel. His Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen assured us that “we can afford” to finance two wars because the US economy is doing “exceptionally well.” Maybe the American people know something Yellen and the elites do not.

As Biden demands another $105 billion to fund the wars in Ukraine, Gaza, and Taiwan, his speech seemed to have a touch of campaign rhetoric in it. “I’m told I was the first American [president] to enter a warzone not controlled by the United States military since President Lincoln,” he said in his speech. The statement is blatantly false, but he must believe it gives him an air of bravado.

They say that it is advantageous to be seen as a “wartime president” when elections roll around, but Joe Biden may have miscalculated the level of support he will get for being a “World-War-Three-time president.”

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/10/ron-...s-at-once/

On Centralization, Decentralization, and Self-Defense - Hans-Hermann Hoppe
By: Hans-Hermann Hoppe
October 22, 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCOllFkXtBM

States, regardless of their constitution, are not economic enterprises. In contrast to the latter, states do not finance themselves by selling products and services to customers who voluntarily pay, but by compulsory levies: taxes collected through the threat and use of violence (and through the paper money they literally create out of thin air). Significantly, economists have therefore referred to governments—i.e., the holders of state power—as stationary bandits. Governments and everyone on their payroll live off the loot stolen from other people. They lead a parasitic existence at the expense of a subdued “host population.”

A number of further insights emerge from this.

Naturally, stationary bandits prefer larger loot to smaller loot. This means that states will always try to increase their tax revenue and further increase their spending by issuing more paper money. The larger the loot, the more favors they can do for themselves, their employees, and their supporters. But there are natural limits to this activity.

On the one hand, the bandits have to be careful not to burden the “hosts” whose work and performance make their parasitic existence possible so much that the latter stop working. On the other hand, they have to fear that their “hosts”—and especially the most productive among them—will migrate from their dominion (territory) and settle elsewhere.

Against this background, a number of historical tendencies and processes become understandable.

First of all: It becomes understandable why there is a tendency towards territorial expansion and political centralization: with this, states succeed in bringing more and more “hosts” under their control and making it more difficult for them to emigrate to foreign territories. This is expected to result in a larger amount of loot. And it becomes clear why the end point of this process, the establishment of a world state, while certainly desirable from the standpoint of the ruling gang, would by no means be a blessing for all of mankind, as is often claimed. Because one cannot emigrate from a world state, and hence, there exists no possibility of escaping state looting by emigration. It is therefore to be expected that with the establishment of a world state, the scope and extent of state exploitation—indicated, among other things, by the level of state income and expenditure, by monetary inflation, the number and volume of so-called public goods and persons employed in the “public service”—will continue to increase beyond any previously known level. And that is certainly not a blessing for the “host population” that has to fund this state superstructure!

Second: A central reason for the rise of the “West” to become the world’s leading economic, scientific, and cultural region becomes understandable. In contrast to China in particular, Europe was characterized by a high degree of political decentralization, with hundreds or even thousands of independent dominions from the early Middle Ages up until the recent past. Some historians have described this state of affairs as “ordered anarchy.” And it is now common among economic historians to see in this quasi-anarchic state a key reason for the so-called European miracle. Because in an environment with a large variety of independent, small-scale territories in the immediate vicinity of each other, it is comparatively easy for the subjects to vote with their feet and escape the robberies of state rulers by emigration. To avert this danger and to keep local producers in line, these rulers are under constant pressure to moderate their exploitation. And this moderation, in turn, promotes economic entrepreneurship, scientific curiosity, and cultural creativity.

Third: In combining these two insights, the grand course of modern history becomes intelligible. Territorial expansion requires war – wars between rival gangs of stationary bandits. But the conduct of war requires means (economic resources), and bandits do not produce anything. They parasitically draw on the means produced and provided by others. They can influence the overall volume of production and the size of their own loot indirectly, however, through the treatment of their “host population.” Other things being equal, the more “liberal” – the less exploitative – the ruling gang, the more productive will be the host population; and parasitically drawing on a more productive host population, then, it is internally “liberal” gangs that tend to win out in war and drive the centralization process. I have called this the paradox of imperialism: internally liberal regimes tend to conduct a more aggressive foreign policy and are the central promoters of imperialism.

This helps understand not only the rise and long-lasting economic and financial supremacy of the collective “West” over and above all of the “Rest.” It helps in particular also to understand the sequence and the progressive stages of Western imperialism. From sizable Spain and Portugal as leading imperialist powers (but broke at last ), the center of economic gravity moves to the small liberal Low Countries (Netherlands), and it is from there that the next major imperialist ventures are launched. The Low Countries are then cut to size, set back and surpassed as the leading imperial power by a liberal Britain with some world-wide Empire. Finally, after more wars, Britain’s former colony, the break-away US takes over and expands on Britain’s erstwhile role. Owing to its ultra-liberal (in comparison) internal policies, US-America grows to become the world’s greatest economic power, and sitting and drawing on such cushy economic foundation, then, the US government has risen to become the world’s foremost imperial power, with a world-wide network of military bases and of foreign vassals and a US-paper-dollar that functions as the international reserve currency (allowing the US gang to have a free lunch – to spend and consume – at foreigners’ expense).

Fourth: These imperialist ventures may initially have liberating effects: a relatively more liberal – less exploitative or more capitalist – regime may be exported to a comparatively less liberal society. However, the further the process of imperial expansion and of political centralization advances, i.e., the closer one gets to the ultimate goal of a one-world government with a global central bank issuing a single universal fiat currency, the less pressure there is on the ruling gang to continue in its former internal liberalism. Internal exploitation, taxation, inflation and regulation will increase and economic crises, stagnation or even impoverishment and decline will result.  And with the economic failure of political centralization becoming increasingly obvious/dramatic, then, the opposite tendency toward de-centralization gains in strength. The lesson of the “European Miracle” is remembered, and the vision of a radically decentralized world, brought about by means of territorial secession – the very anti-thesis to a world-state – gains in popularity. The vision of a world made up of thousands upon thousands of Liechtensteins, Swiss cantons and independent free-holds (dominiums), all linked by free trade and an international gold standard and all seeking, in competition with other places, to retain and attract productive people with favorable local conditions.

One central, regularly presented challenge to this secessionist project – the challenge I will take up in the following – is this: Secession implies that a larger territory is split into two or more smaller parts. Yet how are small and increasingly smaller units to protect and defend themselves against the imperialist desires on the part of some larger state neighbor? Are not small states run by small gangs in constant danger of being conquered and taken over by larger states and larger gangs? And isn’t the only lasting safety and security to be found then as part and parcel of a large state and ultimately a world-state?  Similarly, and directed against the anarchists in particular, it is queried: How can a state-less territory possibly defend itself against an invasion by some neighboring state? Isn’t a state necessary in order to defend against another state? And does this not show the inevitability of states and statism?

First off: Notwithstanding all political centralization going on in the contemporary world, there are still many small or smaller states side by side with large or larger states, in peaceful coexistence. Why hasn’t France taken over Monaco, or Germany Luxemburg, or Switzerland Liechtenstein, or the US Cuba or Costa Rica, or Brazil Uruguay? The reason is certainly not, that the leaders of the large® gangs have any scruples regarding conquest, confiscation, imprisonment or even killing of innocent victims. They owe their very own position as gang leaders to such acts, and they continue to perform them on a daily basis. Rather, what constrains the conduct of the gang leadership and prevents it from giving in to its imperialist desires and going to war, is public opinion.

Unlike the good-old-days, when rival gang leaders went mano-a-mano to fight it out in public with their own weapons, in modern wars the gang leadership stays protected behind, outside the battlefield, and the actual fighting is done by other people, and with other people’s means (money and property). It is not sufficient that the leadership calls for war, then. Others (many others), from the military high-command up high all the way down to the soldier pulling the trigger and the worker producing tanks and ammunition, must be willing to execute its orders. And for such obedience to become possible a reason, a justification must be given by the gang-leadership. There must be a provocation on the part of the take-over target, some outrageous misconduct, that can be presented at home as a justification for an invasion.

Moreover, in addition to domestic (and international) public opinion, the gang leaders are constrained of course in their imperialist desires and their willingness to go to war by the defensive capabilities of the to be conquered and subjected rival gang. The stronger and better armed the rival gang, the higher are the costs of war (and the better must appear the reasons to go to war nonetheless).

In light of this, two guiding principles must be followed by small states and even more so by secessionist movements, whether leading to another, smaller state or a state-less territory (an anarchic social order): First, do not provoke, and second, be armed. I will take up and elaborate on both requirements in turn.

From the viewpoint of the larger gang, secession is in and of itself a provocation and the secessionists deserve to be crushed. But it can crush the secessionists and go to war against its own people only if it has public opinion on its side. In order to prevent this and to help bring about instead a public opinion favorable, sympathetic or at least neutral to their cause, then, the secessionists should declare their independence in the least provocative way. To that purpose, the secession should be presented as a separation solely and alone from the large® government gang and as motivated by some particular grievance against this gang – but not, and by no means also as a separation from the people residing in the territory controlled by this gang, with whom one is to maintain normal relations.

To further help their cause, and to justify and emphasize their declaration of independence as a universal human right, the secessionists are advised to explicitly allow also for secession from the secessionist territory. That is, people within the secessionist territory should be permitted also, for instance, to stay with the old, larger gang and continue to subscribe and submit to its legal framework if they so desire. As for the secessionists, to declare their independence is to declare that the rules and regulations of the ruling gang do no longer automatically apply also to the secessionist territory. Many old, traditional rules may be kept by the secessionists – such as much or even most of existing private law (including criminal law) – but other rules or commands – mostly public law provisions – may be rejected, changed or nullified. In any case, to minimize the risk of a violent reaction from the ruling gang, the separation should occur in a decidedly peaceful manner and in a cooperative spirit.

That is, for instance, the secessionists should not touch the properties within its territory that are claimed as “their own” by the central government gang (offices, administrative buildings, etc.). Independence only implies that central government agents working within the secessionist territory are no longer permitted to perform any executive function at the places where they are. This may lead to the relocation of some such agents or else it may lead to a change in their employer or their occupation – all peacefully. Moreover, to further help avoid any possible “provocation,” the secessionists should declare their commitment to a policy of non-intervention regarding the internal affairs of the rest-territory and to free and unhampered interregional trade, and they should make it clear that they are prepared to pay for the use of any goods or services provided by the larger gang on and off its territory (water, electricity, streets, etc.) the same price, based on the same itemized bill, that also domestic residents must pay. (As far as capital endowment is concerned, the secessionist supposedly had already contributed their part to it before seceding; after the secession, then, only the current usage of such goods and services can be billed.)

Further, in order to minimize the risk of a violent crack-down by the central gang, it is advisable also to abstain from any internal policies that could be construed as provocations. A prohibition  of secession from the secessionists, for instance, can be easily construed as such by the smitten central gang. However, more generally – and more interestingly – it is the very institution of a state – a small state, but nonetheless a territory governed by a monopolist of law and order – that entails reasons and grounds for complaints that can always be used against it, whether by a well-intentioned party such as an anarchist or by an ill-intentioned one, such as the ruling central gang. Even the most liberal small state has a monopoly of jurisdiction and taxation and thus cannot but create some victims, who, properly stylized as “victims of human rights violations,” may provide the “excuse” for an invasion. And as for the actual world, there are countless of “victims” and of the “oppressed” to be found everywhere, and they may even be paid to cry out loud for outside help and intervention.

Far more difficult for a central gang, then, to find fault and to discover a reason for a violent reaction against the secessionists, if these do not institute another state, however small, but a free territory, a state-less private law society. On the secessionist territory all sorts of social relations, of hierarchies and of rank-orders exist; there exist a multitude of private households, enterprises and associations, each with its own internal rules; and there are also services and institutions such as police, insurance and arbitration in place – but, importantly, there exists no territorial monopolist of ultimate decision-making that could issue commands that were binding on all of the territory’s residents and private properties. Any fault, any provocation or aggression to be discovered in a private law society by a ruling central gang, then, is someone’s private fault, provocation or aggression, and as such cannot be used to justify an attack on the collective secessionists. Indeed, if (and to the extent that) there are provocative and aggressive acts committed, these are most likely the acts of criminals – of con-artists, thieves, burglars, rapists, murderers or plain frauds – and criminals will be treated as criminals in a private law society, of course, and be swiftly and effectively punished there. And this result: the treatment of criminals as criminals and the effective containment or reduction of crime, then, is almost impossible for a central government gang to portray to its home public as a provocation and a good enough reason for an invasion of the secessionist territory.

What, however, if the larger gang still decides to attack, all accommodating efforts and peace offerings on the part of the secessionists    notwithstanding? In that case, especially when the secessionists are small in numbers and they are confronted with a huge and mighty gang, it might be best to simply give up and surrender and hope for better times. That way, at least no death and destruction occurs. The motto “rather dead than red” – or more generally: “rather dead than conquered” – and the fighting spirit that it implies may be appropriate sometimes and for some people. But at other times, in particular whenever not only the fighter’s own life but also that of family and friends is at stake, it may be plain stupid and irresponsible, empty heroism.

Even if sometimes advisable, however, surrender is by no means the only option available to secessionists vis-à-vis a big neighboring gang intent upon re-taking its lost territory. They can of course also arm themselves and thus increase the cost of war for an attacker.

What, then, makes for deterrence?

For one, there is certainly strength in numbers. The larger the number of secessionists the more difficult to beat them into submission. But more important than sheer numbers is the cohesion of the secessionists. It is not diversity that gives strength to the secessionists (or the inhabitants of independent small states), but homogeneity: linguistic and cultural commonality, a culture of reciprocity, mutual trust and community spirit.

Still more deterrence can be built up by the secessionists if they allow and promote the institution of an armed citizenry and the establishment of people militias, organized and led by military professionals trained and providing training especially in the conduct of partisan and guerilla warfare. To further strengthen their defensive capabilities and make for still more deterrence, the secessionists may also join or form alliances with various external providers of logistic and military intelligence, assistance, services and equipment (mercenaries). In this endeavor, however, great care must be taken not to lose control over one’s own destiny to some other, foreign entity or institution. That is, the secessionists should stay strictly away from what Thomas Jefferson warned about long ago as “entangling alliances,” i.e. any permanent alliance that may involve or implicate them in foreign quarrels, conflicts or wars that are not, and that are not regarded by them as their own quarrels, conflicts or wars. (NATO is such an entangling alliance: an attack on any one member is supposedly an attack on all members and requires that all members must go to war against the attacker, even if the attacker had been provoked by the attacked.)

Moreover, almost totally ignored and forgotten today, in an atmosphere of heightened militancy and belligerence manufactured in connection with the war in the Ukraine, the “small” can also defend themselves against the “big” by means of civil disobedience. Provided the secessionists – and more generally: the “small” – have the will to be free of the conquerors, the effectiveness of civil disobedience as a defense strategy can hardly be overestimated. The disobedience can take many forms and come in countless degrees. It can range from ostentatious acts of defiance to some completely unobtrusive conduct, thus allowing almost everyone to participate in the defense effort: the courageous and the timid, the young and the old, the leaders and the followers. One may publicly refuse to obey certain laws, or evade and ignore them. One may engage in sabotage, obstruction, negligence, or simply display a lack of diligence. One may openly scoff at orders or comply only incompletely. Tax-payments may be refused or evaded. There may be demonstrations, sit-ins, boycotts, work-stoppages or plain slacking-off. The conquerors may be maltreated, molested, chided, ridiculed, laughed-at or simply ostracized and never assisted in anything. In any case: all of this contributes to the same result: to render the conquerors powerless. The conquerors will leave or they will be absorbed and assimilated by the conquered.

Last but not least, the secessionists – the small – may defend themselves against some bigger invader and raise the level of deterrence for him also in being ready for retaliatory action and counterattack. Any such retaliation should never be directed against the “people,” i.e. the citizenry residing in the territory controlled by the invading gang, while the gang leadership itself is considered off-limits, however, as is current practice and legal opinion. Rather and to the contrary: in order to be effective as a deterrent, any retaliation should be explicitly and exclusively directed against the gang leadership. The leadership, from the king, president and prime minister up high on successively downward should come to fear, wherever they are, that they may be personally targeted as aggressors and be brought down by long- or short-range precision weapons, assassination commandos or secretive poisoning. At the same time, all collateral damage to the property of innocent civilians should be avoided or at least minimized, so as to raise sympathy for the secessionists (the small) and sow doubt and skepticism regarding the war policy of one’s big home-gang, potentially endangering the gang leadership’s legitimacy in the public mind and thus bringing about a situation to be averted at all costs.

Contrary to popular opinion, then, the unitary, top-down command structure of a state is not necessarily a strength in war, but it leaves an Achilles heel open to any adversary. Once the top are toppled the war is essentially over. So, whenever under attack (and unwilling to surrender), go for the top of the attacking gang. Yet this does not just hold for the (small) attacked, however, but also for the (big) attacker. He, too, will go for the top of the secessionists (the small) to accomplish his conquest or re-conquest. And the institution of a state is also the Achilles heel in the defense of the secessionists – the small – against a take-over by the big central gang – and it is once again the anarchic, no-state private law society that turns out as offering the best protection and defense against such contingency.

If the secessionists institute another, smaller state on a smaller territory (rather than a private law society), the decision of how to defend against an invasion by some bigger neighboring gang will fall to the leadership of the secessionist state. As the monopolist of ultimate decision-making, the leadership of the new small(er) gang decides, bindingly for everyone on the secessionist territory, whether to resist or not; if to resist, whether in the form of civil disobedience, armed resistance or some combination thereof, and if of armed resistance, of what form. If it decides to put up no resistance, this may be a well-meaning decision or it may be the result of bribes or threats by the invading state – but in any case, it will be contrary to the will of many who would have liked to resist and who are thus put in double jeopardy because as resisters they now disobey their own state as well as the invader. On the other hand, if the state decides to resist, this again may be a well-meaning decision or it may be the result of pride or fear – but in any case, it too will be contrary to the preferences of many who would have liked not to resist or to resist by different means, and who are now entangled as accomplices in the state’s schemes and subjected to the same collateral fallout and victor’s justice as everyone else.

Weakened by various internal divisions and opposing forces and factions, then, the central gang may be able to crush the secessionists and retake its lost territory with just one surgical strike or one decisive victory over the secessionist government gang. Once this gang is defeated, the entire secessionist movement is finished (at least for the time being).

Matters are distinctly different, however, if the secessionists establish instead  a private law society on the seceded territories. There is no government, no central gang in place that makes one all-binding decision on matters of war and peace. Instead there are numerous interconnected individuals and institutions who choose their own defense strategy, each in accordance with their own risk assessment. Consequently, the attacking gang has far more difficulties conquering the territory. It is no longer sufficient for the attacker to “know” the secessionist (small) government and to win one decisive victory over it to end the war. Because in a private law society there exists no one central decision-maker – and hence, there exist, from the perspective of the attacker, no one clearly identifiable enemy, but there exists instead a multitude of mostly “unknown” private parties, some big, some small, some hostile, some friendly or neutral, some armed and insured and others not. In that situation there is simply no reason to be found to “sell” to one’s invading soldiers or to the public at home (that is to finance the whole endeavor) as to why a collective war must be waged against the secessionists, if, after all, these are just a bunch of independent private parties, associations and institutions. Then, as noted already before, a case can possibly be made for the punishment of some particular party, but nothing constituting a casus belli could ever arise out of such a constellation. Indeed, faced with some neighboring free territory, the abandoned central ruling gang may well be happy to keep control of the territory that it still has and not to lose too many productive people to the secessionists (due to emigration) rather than engage in the violent reconquest of some lost territory and thereby running the risk of losing all of its legitimacy in the eyes of the general public, at home as well as abroad.

To sum up: From the nature of the state as a parasitic gang a tendency toward political centralization can be deduced. As well, based on a few elementary economic considerations, the “paradox of imperialism” and the “dialectic of centralization” can be explained. That is, the fact that political centralization reduces interregional competition and hence tends to lower economic welfare; and yet, that centralization insofar as it is driven by the most “liberal” gang leadership can have a liberating effect at first, and only eventually, the closer a ruling gang comes to the position of a global hegemon, shows its true colors of increasing oppression, social strife, economic crises and civilizational decline. Having about reached this point, the opposite tendency toward political de-centralization has increasingly gained in popularity in recent times. Consequently, the prospects of secessionist movements were analyzed: their difficulties, what mistakes to avoid, and how best to defend against a foreign take-over. In conclusion – as confirmed also empirically by the long-lasting peaceful coexistence of small and large states and by multiple examples of peaceful secession (USSR breakup, Czechia, Slovakia, Malaysia, Singapore, Brexit) – there is, all central gang objections notwithstanding, no principal argument to be made against a process of successively progressing secession. To the contrary, the further this process advances and the larger the number of independent territories the better for the all-around economic well-being. Nor is there any principal argument against the complete dissolution of the state and the establishment and the successful defense of a private law society, as the logical end-point of the process of secession and of political de-centralization. After all, a private law society, exemplified by hierarchically ordered families and by every small, family-centered face-to-face community, logically and temporally preceded any state and all political centralization; and notwithstanding all distortions and perversions of private law brought about in the meantime by state-legislation and so-called public law, the common, private (and criminal) law notions of right and wrong have not been wiped out entirely and forgotten. Hence, the establishment of a private law society via the lengthy detour of a history of statism is like a return to normal, to something old and familiar, from a long period of aberrations – albeit a return on a different level of social and economic development now, of course, than that prevailing when the process of state-formation and political centralization first took off, way back in history.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHImsm9satA

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/09/hans...rspective/

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/10/hans...f-defense/

Evil Walks Among Us: Monsters with Human Faces Wreak Havoc on Our Freedoms
By John & Nisha Whitehead | The Rutherford Institute
October 24, 2023

    “But these weren’t the kind of monsters that had tentacles and rotting skin, the kind a seven-year-old might be able to wrap his mind around—they were monsters with human faces, in crisp uniforms, marching in lockstep, so banal you don’t recognize them for what they are until it’s too late.” ― Ransom Riggs, Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children

Enough already.

Enough with the distractions. Enough with the partisan jousting.

Enough with the sniping and name-calling and mud-slinging that do nothing to make this country safer or freer or more just.

We have let the government’s evil-doing, abuses, power grabs, brutality, meanness, inhumanity, immorality, greed, corruption, debauchery and tyranny go on for too long.

We are approaching a reckoning.

This is the point, as the poet W. B. Yeats warned, when things fall apart and anarchy is loosed upon the world.

We have seen this convergence before in Hitler’s Germany, in Stalin’s Russia, in Mussolini’s Italy, and in Mao’s China: the rise of strongmen and demagogues, the ascendency of profit-driven politics over deep-seated principles, the warring nationalism that seeks to divide and conquer, the callous disregard for basic human rights and dignity, and the silence of people who should know better.

Yet no matter how many times the world has been down this road before, we can’t seem to avoid repeating the deadly mistakes of the past.

This is not just playing out on a national and international scale. It is wreaking havoc at the most immediate level, as well, creating rifts and polarities within families and friends, neighborhoods and communities that keep the populace warring among themselves and incapable of presenting a united front in the face of the government’s goose-stepping despotism.

We labor today under the weight of countless tyrannies, large and small, disguised as “the better good,” marketed as benevolence, enforced with armed police, and carried out by an elite class of government officials who are largely insulated from the ill effects of their actions.

For too long now, the American people have rationalized turning a blind eye to all manner of government wrongdoing—asset forfeiture schemes, corruption, surveillance, endless wars, SWAT team raids, militarized police, profit-driven private prisons, and so on—because they were the so-called lesser of two evils.

Yet the unavoidable truth is that the government—through its acts of power grabs, brutality, meanness, inhumanity, immorality, greed, corruption, debauchery and tyranny—has become almost indistinguishable from the evil it claims to be fighting, whether that evil takes the form of terrorism, torture, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, murder, violence, theft, pornography, scientific experimentation’s or some other diabolical means of inflicting pain, suffering and servitude on humanity.

At its core, this is not a debate about politics, or constitutionalism, or even tyranny disguised as law-and-order. This is a condemnation of the monsters with human faces who walk among us.

Many of them work for the U.S. government.

This is the premise of John Carpenter’s film They Live, which was released thirty-five years ago and remains unnervingly, chillingly appropriate for our modern age.

Best known for his horror film Halloween, which assumes that there is a form of evil so dark that it can’t be killed, Carpenter’s larger body of work is infused with a strong anti-authoritarian, anti-establishment, laconic bent that speaks to the filmmaker’s concerns about the unraveling of our society, particularly our government.

Time and again, Carpenter portrays the government working against its own citizens, a populace out of touch with reality, technology run amok, and a future more horrific than any horror film.

In Escape from New York, Carpenter presents fascism as the future of America.

In The Thing, a remake of the 1951 sci-fi classic of the same name, Carpenter presupposes that increasingly we are all becoming dehumanized.

In Christine, the film adaptation of Stephen King’s novel about a demon-possessed car, technology exhibits a will and consciousness of its own and goes on a murderous rampage.

In In the Mouth of Madness, Carpenter notes that evil grows when people lose “the ability to know the difference between reality and fantasy.”

And then there is Carpenter’s They Live, in which two migrant workers discover that the world is not as it seems. In fact, the population is actually being controlled and exploited by aliens working in partnership with an oligarchic elite. All the while, the populace—blissfully unaware of the real agenda at work in their lives—has been lulled into complacency, indoctrinated into compliance, bombarded with media distractions, and hypnotized by subliminal messages beamed out of television and various electronic devices, billboards and the like.

It is only when homeless drifter John Nada (played to the hilt by the late Roddy Piper) discovers a pair of doctored sunglasses—Hoffman lenses—that Nada sees what lies beneath the elite’s fabricated reality: control and bondage.

When viewed through the lens of truth, the elite, who appear human until stripped of their disguises, are shown to be monsters who have enslaved the citizenry in order to prey on them.

Likewise, billboards blare out hidden, authoritative messages: a bikini-clad woman in one ad is actually ordering viewers to “MARRY AND REPRODUCE.” Magazine racks scream “CONSUME” and “OBEY.” A wad of dollar bills in a vendor’s hand proclaims, “THIS IS YOUR GOD.”

When viewed through Nada’s Hoffman lenses, some of the other hidden messages being drummed into the people’s subconscious include: NO INDEPENDENT THOUGHT, CONFORM, SUBMIT, STAY ASLEEP, BUY, WATCH TV, NO IMAGINATION, and DO NOT QUESTION AUTHORITY.

This indoctrination campaign engineered by the elite in They Live is painfully familiar to anyone who has studied the decline of American culture.

A citizenry that does not think for themselves, obeys without question, is submissive, does not challenge authority, does not think outside the box, and is content to sit back and be entertained is a citizenry that can be easily controlled.

In this way, the subtle message of They Live provides an apt analogy of our own distorted vision of life in the American police state, what philosopher Slavoj Žižek refers to as dictatorship in democracy, “the invisible order which sustains your apparent freedom.”

Tune out the government’s attempts to distract, divert and befuddle us and tune into what’s really going on in this country, and you’ll run headlong into an unmistakable, unpalatable truth: what we are dealing with today is an authoritarian beast that has outgrown its chains and will not be restrained.

We’re being fed a series of carefully contrived fictions that bear no resemblance to reality.

Despite the fact that we are 17,600 times more likely to die from heart disease than from a terrorist attack; 11,000 times more likely to die from an airplane accident than from a terrorist plot involving an airplane; 1,048 times more likely to die from a car accident than a terrorist attack, and 8 times more likely to be killed by a police officer than by a terrorist , we have handed over control of our lives to government officials who treat us as a means to an end—the source of money and power.

As the Bearded Man in They Live warns, “They are dismantling the sleeping middle class. More and more people are becoming poor. We are their cattle. We are being bred for slavery.”

We have bought into the illusion and refused to grasp the truth.

From the moment we are born until we die, we are indoctrinated into believing that those who rule us do it for our own good. The truth is far different.

The powers-that-be want us to feel threatened by forces beyond our control (terrorists, pandemics, mass shootings, etc.).

They want us afraid and dependent on the government and its militarized armies for our safety and well-being.

They want us distrustful of each other, divided by our prejudices, and at each other’s throats.

We are little more than expendable resources to be used, abused and discarded.

In fact, a study conducted by Princeton and Northwestern University concluded that the U.S. government does not represent the majority of American citizens. Instead, the study found that the government is ruled by the rich and powerful, or the so-called “economic elite.” Moreover, the researchers concluded that policies enacted by this governmental elite nearly always favor special interests and lobbying groups.

In other words, we are being ruled by an oligarchy disguised as a democracy, and arguably on our way towards fascism—a form of government where private corporate interests rule, money calls the shots, and the people are seen as mere subjects to be controlled.

Rest assured that when and if fascism finally takes hold in America, the basic forms of government will remain: Fascism will appear to be friendly. The legislators will be in session. There will be elections, and the news media will continue to cover the entertainment and political trivia. Consent of the governed, however, will no longer apply. Actual control will have finally passed to the oligarchic elite controlling the government behind the scenes.

Sound familiar?

Clearly, we are now ruled by an oligarchic elite of governmental and corporate interests.

We have moved into “corporatism” (favored by Benito Mussolini), which is a halfway point on the road to full-blown fascism.

Corporatism is where the few moneyed interests—not elected by the citizenry—rule over the many. In this way, it is not a democracy or a republican form of government, which is what the American government was established to be. It is a top-down form of government and one which has a terrifying history typified by the developments that occurred in totalitarian regimes of the past: police states where everyone is watched and spied on, rounded up for minor infractions by government agents, placed under police control, and placed in detention (a.k.a. concentration) camps.

For the final hammer of fascism to fall, it will require the most crucial ingredient: the majority of the people will have to agree that it’s not only expedient but necessary.

But why would a people agree to such an oppressive regime?

The answer is the same in every age: fear.

Fear makes people stupid.

Fear is the method most often used by politicians to increase the power of government. And, as most social commentators recognize, an atmosphere of fear permeates modern America: fear of terrorism, fear of the police, fear of our neighbors and so on.

The propaganda of fear has been used quite effectively by those who want to gain control, and it is transforming the populace into fearful, compliant, pacified zombies content to march in lockstep with the government’s dictates.

This brings me back to They Live, in which the real zombies are not the aliens calling the shots but the populace who are content to remain controlled.

When all is said and done, the world of They Live is not so different from our own. As one of the characters points out, “The poor and the underclass are growing. Racial justice and human rights are nonexistent. They have created a repressive society, and we are their unwitting accomplices. Their intention to rule rests with the annihilation of consciousness. We have been lulled into a trance. They have made us indifferent to ourselves, to others. We are focused only on our own gain.”

We, too, are focused only on our own pleasures, prejudices and gains. Our poor and underclasses are also growing. Injustice is growing. Inequality is growing. A concern for human rights is nearly nonexistent. We too have been lulled into a trance, indifferent to others.

Oblivious to what lies ahead, we’ve been manipulated into believing that if we continue to consume, obey, and have faith, things will work out. But that’s never been true of emerging regimes. And by the time we feel the hammer coming down upon us, it will be too late.

So where does that leave us?

The characters who populate Carpenter’s films provide some insight.

Underneath their machismo, they still believe in the ideals of liberty and equal opportunity. Their beliefs place them in constant opposition with the law and the establishment, but they are nonetheless freedom fighters.

When, for example, John Nada destroys the alien hypno-transmitter in They Live, he delivers a wake-up call for freedom. As Nada memorably declares, “I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I’m all out of bubblegum.”

In other words: we need to get active and take a stand for what’s really important.

Stop allowing yourselves to be easily distracted by pointless political spectacles and pay attention to what’s really going on in the country.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, the real battle for control of this nation is taking place on roadsides, in police cars, on witness stands, over phone lines, in government offices, in corporate offices, in public school hallways and classrooms, in parks and city council meetings, and in towns and cities across this country.

All the trappings of the American police state are now in plain sight.

Wake up, America.

If they live (the tyrants, the oppressors, the invaders, the overlords), it is only because “we the people” sleep.

https://www.rutherford.org/publications_...r_freedoms

Junk Food Shills: Why FDA-Approved Food Can Be Poison
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
October 19, 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHrY2QNrCQk

Foods that are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration are passed off as the gold-standard or, at the very least, safe. Meanwhile, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND), which claims to be “your source for science-based food and nutrition information,”1 is deemed the “authority” on food policy and the development of U.S. dietary guidelines.

But if you rely on FDA and AND seals of approval to guide your food choices, you’re likely to be led astray. Both entities — and other preeminent public health organizations — represent textbook cases of corporate capture. Beholden to industry, they’re unable to represent the best interests of the American, and global, public. Just look at what happened with aspartame.

WHO Sends Mixed Messages About Aspartame

In May 2023, the World Health Organization released a new guideline advising not to use non-sugar sweeteners (NSS), i.e., artificial sweeteners, for weight control because they don’t offer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.2

What’s more, the systematic review suggested “potential undesirable effects from long-term use of NSS, such as an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and mortality in adults.” Bladder cancer was also among the potential risks.3

Then, July 14, 2023, WHO released its hazard and risk assessments of aspartame,4 in which WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified aspartame as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.” I warned about aspartame’s cancer-causing potential in an article I wrote for The Huffington Post, now HuffPost, back in 2010.5 It’s since been deleted — but you can see just how long this danger has been known.

U.S. Right to Know (USRTK) has also compiled decades of science showing that aspartame poses serious health risks.6 The Joint WHO and Food and Agriculture Organization’s Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), which was in the process of updating its aspartame risk assessment,7 however, released a recommendation that doesn’t line up.

Despite its possible carcinogenicity, JEFCA reaffirmed that aspartame could be safely consumed at an acceptable daily intake of 40 mg/kg of body weight.8

Coca-Cola Sways WHO Aspartame Review

“Why the split decision?” asked Gary Ruskin, USRTK executive director. “One possible answer: at least six out of 13 JECFA panel members have ties to the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI), a longtime Coca-Cola front group. Both the chair and vice chair of the JECFA panel have ties to ILSI.”9

ILSI is a nonprofit organization founded by former Coca-Cola senior vice president Alex Malaspina.10 Coca-Cola has also contributed funds to ILSI. According to a case study published in Public Health Nutrition:11

“Previous research shows that ILSI has been an important vehicle for Coca-Cola to exert influence around the world, on policy, researchers, events, policymakers and practitioners, taking a role in promoting messaging that can further commercial interests.

ILSI supported 30 of the events we identified. Sometimes, ILSI offered to act as a conduit to reimburse public health scientists through Coca-Cola by having them deliver presentations with selected topics.”

ILSI has been exposed as a shill for the junk food industry, and internal documents revealed ILSI embedded itself in public health panels across Europe and the United Nations in an effort to promote its own industry-focused agenda to raise profits at the expense of public health worldwide.12

With Coca-Cola behind ILSI, and aspartame being the sweetener used in Diet Coke, anyone with ties to ILSI should not have been involved in the JECFA aspartame ruling. Yet, here we are. Ruskin says:13

“JECFA panelists ruling on a chemical that is important to Coca-Cola should not be affiliated with a longtime Coca-Cola front group. This is an obvious conflict of interest. Because of this conflict of interest, JECFA’s conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them.”

US Nutrition Guidelines Are Corrupted by Corporations

In the video above,14 James Li, host of 51/49 with James Li and a contributor to Breaking Points With Krystal and Saagar, also details the blatant conflicts of interest that have sabotaged Americans’ health by corrupting dietary advice and guidelines. This includes corporate capture of nutrition professionals via AND.

USRTK, along with public health scholars, conducted a five-year investigation into AND’s uncomfortably close ties to junk food manufacturers like Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, General Mills and Kraft, among others.15

Published in Public Health Nutrition in October 2022, the analysis included documents from 2014 to 2020 obtained through freedom of information requests.16 A symbiotic relationship between AND, the AND Foundation (ANDF) and corporations was revealed, with industry giants assisting AND and its foundation with financial contributions.

Not surprisingly, AND acts as a pro-industry voice as a result,17 one that cannot, in this capacity, represent the best interests of Americans’ health. According to the study:18

“The AND, AND Foundation (ANDF) and its key leaders have ongoing interactions with corporations. These include AND’s leaders holding key positions in multinational food, pharmaceutical or agribusiness corporations, and AND accepting corporate financial contributions.

We found the AND has invested funds in corporations such as Nestlé, PepsiCo and pharmaceutical companies, has discussed internal policies to fit industry needs and has had public positions favoring corporations.”

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Supports Aspartame

Given this information, can you guess what the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics had to say about aspartame? While announcing that IARC had classified the artificial sweetener as “possibly carcinogenic to humans,” it stood behind it nonetheless, stating in a news release:19

“The Academy will continue to support the recommendations of registered dietitian nutritionists, the food and nutrition experts, who accept the use of non-nutritive sweeteners, including aspartame, by their patients and clients within accepted daily limits until further evidence can be generated … No one ingredient or food increases cancer risk.”

It’s not as though aspartame is an essential nutrient the body needs. It’s a food additive that can easily be excluded from the diet — one that may cause cancer. So why would any nutrition authority suggest people take the risk of consuming it?

The fact is that the junk food culture runs deep at AND, beginning in academic institutions and continuing on through regular appearances at corporate conferences and direct monetary contributions.

From 2011 to 2017, AND received more than $4 million in donations from junk food and ultraprocessed food companies like Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Nestlé, Hershey, Kellogg’s, and Conagra.20 AND also invested in junk food industries, supporting the very corporations at the root of failing public health in the U.S. In one example from 2015 and 2016, AND had stock in PepsiCo, Nestlé and J.M. Smucker valued at more than $1 million.21

“You could argue free market but, funny enough, emails once again obtained through FOIA revealed that some of the Academy’s leadership were aware that this presented a potential conflict of interest,” Li says.22

In the video, he presents an email from AND spokesperson Donna Martin, who wrote, “Everything looks good to me. The only flag that I saw was that PepsiCo is one of our top 10 stocks. I personally like PepsiCo and do not have any problems with us owning it but I wonder if someone will say something about that.”

“Well Donna, it’s not a great look,” Li says.23 Additional egregious findings include the following, reported by USRTK:24

    AND received millions of dollars from companies in the food, pharmaceutical and agribusiness industries. In exchange for these gifts, AND “had policies to provide favors and benefits in return.”
    AND leaders have acted as employees of or consultants for multinational food, pharmaceutical and agribusiness corporations.
    AND discusses policies to “fit the needs of its food, agribusiness and pharmaceutical industry sponsors.”

Registered Dietitians Paid to Promote Aspartame’s ‘Safety’

There are influencers on social media for just about every conceivable product — including food. Among them are registered dietitians promoting artificial sweeteners and other junk foods while on the industry’s payroll.25

Some of these health professionals are spreading the hashtag #safetyofaspartame, while blasting WHO’s aspartame-designation as “clickbait” and “fear mongering headlines.”26 A joint investigation by The Washington Post and The Examination revealed this wasn’t coincidence but a coordinated campaign by trade group American Beverage, which resulted in at least 35 social media posts from health professionals. According to The Washington Post:27

“The trade group paid an undisclosed amount to 10 registered dietitians, as well as a physician and a fitness influencer, to use their social media accounts to help blunt the WHO’s claims that aspartame, a mainstay of Diet Coke and other sodas, is ineffective for weight loss and “possibly carcinogenic.”

The campaign, which the beverage group acknowledged organizing, highlighted a little-known tactic the multibillion-dollar food and beverage industry is using to sway consumers faced with often-contradictory health messages about popular products.”

The investigation found that out of 68 dietitians who had 10,000 or more followers on social media, about half had promoted food, beverages or supplements to about 11 million followers over the last year. Messages included those encouraging the consumption of candy and ice cream while minimizing the health risks of ultraprocessed foods.28

While The Federal Trade Commission tells social media influencers to disclose when they’re being paid for promotions,29 the investigation found that many influencers weren’t making their corporate ties clear.

Marlene Schwartz, the director of the University of Connecticut’s Rudd Center for Food Policy and Health, told The Washington Post, “They’re getting these dietitians to essentially do their marketing for them.”30 Li showed another example in the video — an article published on the Food Network, written by a registered dietitian, that’s titled, “This Dietitian Wants You to Eat More Processed Food.”31

“This is how the whole processed food industry tunnels in and gets legitimacy for the standard American diet that is causing us so much pain and suffering,” Ruskin says.32

Since you can’t rely on conflicted public health agencies like AND and their registered dietitians or the FDA to provide unbiased nutrition advice, seek it out from sources that put human health ahead of profits. And support those who are working to raise awareness about the widespread corruption tainting public health. Li says:33

“Whether you think the academy is or isn’t able to stay independent and objective given their close financial ties to Big Food, Big Pharma and other agribusiness corporations, the fact is Americans are getting sicker year after year. Obesity, skyrocketing. Type 2 diabetes — on the rise. Cardiovascular disease, after a brief decline, it’s on the rise again.

All the while, definitely not coincidentally, health care is quickly becoming America’s largest industry.

… we must continue to advocate for transparency — support the work of organizations that worked tirelessly to obtain documents previously hidden from the public — to arm ourselves with knowledge and to seek the unvarnished truth, because our health literally depends on it.”

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/10/jose...be-poison/

Globalists Fear Spartacus and His Slave Rebellion
By J.B. Shurk
October 19, 2023

Something intriguing is happening with bitcoin.  What started as a series of perplexing data “inscriptions” containing classified files from the U.S. government has now been confirmed by Bitcoin Magazine as an ongoing effort to cement information in the public record beyond the reach of government censorship.

An anonymous guardian of free speech has begun using bitcoin to republish all of the information originally published by Julian Assange’s WikiLeaks back in 2010.  Codenamed “Project Spartacus,” the operation seeks to take advantage of several inherent bitcoin attributes:

(1) It utilizes bitcoin’s Ordinals protocol that allows users to add personalized data to units of the cryptocurrency’s blockchain.

(2) Because data within integrated parts of the blockchain cannot be subsequently removed, it forms a part of the cryptocurrency’s permanent record.

(3) Because the blockchain of transactions operates on a decentralized, global network of sovereign nodes, there is no tech CEO or other middleman who can intervene to do governments’ censorship bidding. 

Decentralized blockchain technology, in other words, is about much more than cryptocurrencies.  It is a powerful tool that will continue to allow ordinary people to evade government authority.

Project Spartacus is just the beginning.  Imagine new social media networks built from decentralized blockchains of information.  Imagine an entirely new internet operating beyond the reach of corporate search engines, regulated addresses, and government permissions.  With no corporation in control of the networks or in singular possession of communicated data on privately held servers, the problem of State-directed censorship disappears.  No longer could corporate oligarchs operate in concert with government dictators to silence public dissent and magnify government propaganda.  No longer would it matter what the Marxist Globalists at Facebook or Google think is true — or what they think should be falsely presented as truth — once ordinary people have a dependable workaround technology that allows them to share information free from Big Brother’s menacing intervention.

Discreetly shared samizdat has returned.  It will soon run on decentralized blockchain.

This gets to another important point: while Western governments continue to expand their use of cutting-edge technologies to monitor and control the public, ordinary citizens are finding ways to use these same technologies to become more independent.  The reason governments have gone all in on mass surveillance and censorship, after all, is because they are losing their shadow monopolies over public perception, shared information, and financial control.

Think about the soft power that ordinary people have gained in the last twenty-five years.  In the past, even the “freest” Western governments exercised quiet control over their citizens in ways the citizenry largely did not comprehend:

(1) Market Manipulation

By mandating the use of national fiat currencies that have over the last century become completely untethered from tangible long-term stores of value such as gold, governments have conspired with central banks to secretly tax their citizens with steady inflation arising from unchecked government spending and currency-printing.  By forcing citizens to transact with paper monies vulnerable to central bank manipulation, governments have effectively taken over the means of a nation’s production, the valuation of its capital assets, and the long-term worth of an hour of labor.  With a dependable currency, a worker would be able to store two years’ worth of labor as savings in a bank, pull those savings out in fifty years, and find that they still equaled two years’ worth of comparable labor.  With central bank funny money severely eroding the value of labor saved in fiat currencies, that worker’s previous two years of labor wouldn’t even afford a week’s bills at today’s prices.  Even as Western governments applaud “free markets,” they have pursued socialist policies that give them direct control over what is in every citizen’s pockets.

In a short time, the public’s financial I.Q. has grown substantially.  Public day trading has introduced ordinary consumers to the vagaries of the stock market.  The emergence of cryptocurrencies has heightened the public’s understanding of the government’s regular manipulation of money.  If enough people eventually choose to adopt a commodity-backed cryptocurrency or similarly independent workaround, they will effectively set up a market system beyond the reach of investment bank speculators, central bank money-printers, and government spendthrifts.  They would upend global financial power.

(2) News, Mass Communication, and Public Perception

Even in the United States, where free speech has long been celebrated and the blunt retort — “It’s a free country, isn’t it?” — has endured as an unofficial motto, freedom has never been as it seems.  For most of the last century, a handful of broadcast news anchors and national newspapers unilaterally determined what was newsworthy and what should be kept a State secret.  Ordinary citizens lacking privilege or celebrity had practically no means of expressing their points of view to the broader public.  The government had little trouble influencing public perception when it could corral the country’s original “influencers” in a small White House Briefing Room and spoon-feed the press daily “narratives.”  Hollywood and the book-publishing cartels easily controlled the country’s cultural leanings. 

With the rise of the internet, the government lost both its monopoly over information and its illusion of being kept honest by an independent press corps.  Citizen journalists fundamentally weakened the government’s power by allowing the public to determine what is newsworthy.  Simultaneously, normal Americans found new megaphones for publicly communicating ideas that had never been expressed beyond the family home.  Private webpages, blogs, self-published books, social media posts, videos, and other sources of knowledge and entertainment have empowered ordinary people to communicate on a mass scale and shape public perception.  This free speech revolution has upended governments’ enduring power over citizens’ minds.

Today’s totalitarianism has sprung up in national capitals not just because Marxist globalists have risen to power throughout the West; it is a direct reaction to the tremendous technological changes that have shifted power away from government authorities and to the people over the last few decades.  In losing their traditional monopolies of control, these governments are now thrashing about in desperation to reacquire power.  If they must force everyone to use worthless central bank digital currencies by exacerbating current economic crises and confiscating gold, so be it.  If they must turn their backs on protections for free speech by claiming that all dissent is either “disinformation” or illicit “hate,” they will do so.  If they must construct a system of domestic surveillance and social credit scores that can reinvigorate governments’ lost control mechanisms of the past, they will jump at the opportunity. 

Western governments were horrified by the Soviet Union’s Iron Curtain not because it deprived those imprisoned of free will and liberty, but rather because its machinery of coercion was so inartfully blunt.  Western oligarchs have always preferred to build their systems of control as beautiful — if not invisible — crystal prisons that trap citizens inside alluring cages without their knowledge.  When ideas and markets are controlled and ordinary people are none the wiser, illusions of freedom persist.  With the era of such illusions now shattered and more people thinking for themselves than ever before, Deep State praetorians of formerly “free” nations are frantically yanking at the rusty chains of twentieth-century tyranny in hopes of dropping a new Iron Curtain around their peoples before time runs out!

That is the game we see today and the source of all the chaos and confusion that keeps beating us in the heads in the forms of new national emergencies, risky wars, censorship campaigns, and unfettered domestic surveillance.

Western governments are taking revenge against their own people for having the temerity to think and speak freely — and the audacity to reclaim power from the permanent “ruling class.”  This aggression is consequently creating a public revolt.  Project Spartacus is but one example.  As more slaves break free of the government’s chains, the real rebellion begins.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles...llion.html

With Its Power To Plunge An Entire Country Into An 'Information Black Hole,' An 'Internet Kill Switch' Is A Tyrants Best Friend And A Canary In The Coal Mine Of A Nation's Descent Into Tyranny
- Rand Paul Recently Warned America Could Be Plunged Into Digital Darkness
By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die
October 22, 2023

Sometimes during conversations between people who still get their news via watching TV or the 'approved topics' websites such as facebook 'allow' to be discussed, and people who get their news online and from independent news websites, it feels like the people having the conversation are living in completely different universes or alternative realities, as topics such as the Maui Fires, all of the people who 'Died Suddenly' following getting 'vaxxed' or the 'rampant crime spree' carried out by the 'biden crime family' will receive wide eyed looks or blank stares and total silence from those who still believe the MSM.

With such experiences proving the mainstream media is covering up massive global crimes and treason by our so-called 'leaders' since they're not discussing the most important topics of the day, it also shows us once again why the internet is still a grave threat to the rule of the globalists, with anyone who reads stories about the globalists treason, and then bothers to spend a little bit of time to investigate things themselves, immediately agree with the reports published by the 'independent media.'

And with those reasons alone a good reason why Americans all across the country are now living in 'alternative realities,' one where people get the stories corrupt politicians don't want people to know about and one full of propaganda and lies, a story recently came to our attention from the website 'Not The Bee' which helps explain how biden and the treasonous turncoats that inhabit much of the US govt could make many of their problems go away in one fell swoop, with Rand Paul recently warning of the Presidents 'internet kill switch.' From this story over at Wired Conservative which takes a look at this recent development.

As American citizens, it seems to be hardwired in us not to want the government to control us in pretty much any way. And that means things like an “internet kill switch” in the hands of the president is very scary.

It’s also precisely why Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky is bringing attention to and opposing a 1930s law that does just that.

Paul brought it all up during a recent interview with Dr. Scott Atlas on the latter’s podcast. (Which you can hear in the 1st video at the bottom of this ANP story!!)

He noted that, like most control-seeking laws, this one was put in place to be used in very rare and serious situations, you know, like in an emergency or national crisis.

But as Paul points out, the COVID-19 pandemic proved just how easily most of those “emergency powers” could be abused.

For example, a law from the 1930s gives the CDC “emergency powers” do “this and this for certain diseases, quarantine, and then it had a clause in there ‘and whatever else is necessary,’” Paul said.

By now, most of those “emergency powers” are no longer in play. But the very idea that they could still be used is quite terrifying.

And it’s even more terrifying that one of those emergency powers also supposedly gives the sitting US president the power to “shut down all communications and control all communications in the US.” This is according to the Communications Act’s Section 706.

As Paul says, it’s basically an “internet kill switch,” given how important the internet is to our daily lives.

It’s also something he and others are working hard to either add some serious limits to or completely get rid of.

“No president of either party should have this kind of power.”

And in 2023 or 2024 or 2025 or at any point in the future, such a 'kill switch' could easily be used to shut the whole thing down, despite the consequences since almost the entire 'system' now runs off of it, to avoid 'too many people' finding out about their crimes and treason through a story that somehow goes mega-viral through the internet on independent media that the mainstream media chooses not to cover; an 'internet kill switch' could stop everything it its tracks.

A wannabe tyrants best friend, as we'd warned in numerous stories on ANP, including this one from September of 2021 titled "Globalists Hint At 'An Event' To 'Cut Off Internet Communications' To Usher In Their End Game As 'The Free Flow Of Information' Is Needed For Freedom's Last Stand;" this one from December of 2020 titled "Killing The Internet To Hide The Truth? Prepare For Them To Shut It All Down - Imagine Awakening To No Internet As Hacks, Censors And 'Convenient' Outages Are Increasing;" and as this one from September 2021 titled "'Operation Starfall' Introduced By Republicans In Congress Warns Of 'Rogue Regimes Shutting Down The Internet' And 'Tyrants Shutting Off The Lights' - Is The 'Internet Kill Switch' About To Go Live?," NEVER THINK IT CAN'T HAPPEN HERE!

As this September of 2022 story over at the website Rest Of World points out in an eye-opening story, over a period of only seven years, 60 different countries carried out at least 935 different internet shutdowns, showing us all just how easy it is for authoritarian regimes to shut down 'dissent.'

With tyrants all across the planet using the internet to 'police' speech, leading to prison terms being issue in numerous countries for people speaking out or sharing information that was 'unapproved' by the government, as we've warned over and over and over again on ANP, we have absolute proof here in the US that US politicians and the US govt have used widespread censorship to shut down conversation on topics such as Hunter Biden's laptop, thus helping joe biden and democrats steal the 2020 election.

As this August 29th of 2022 story over at the Guardian titled "Flicking the kill switch: governments embrace internet shutdowns as a form of control" had warned, "from Sudan to Syria, Jordan to Jaipur, the trend towards digital authoritarianism is deepening." And while that story didn't mention the United States of America or joe biden, as we'll see in the excerpt below from it, an internet kill switch being used will immediately throw a country or a continent into an 'information black hole'.

On 1 February 2021, reporter Ko Zin Lin Htet received a panicked phone call from a source in Yangon, Myanmar’s most populous city. The caller said the military had seized power and was arresting opposition politicians, then hung up. Ko Zin Lin Htet remembered what he did next: “I checked my phone and my internet connection. There was nothing there.”

He got on his motorbike and drove to the parliament, where he saw military personnel, not police, guarding the buildings. At that moment, Ko Zin Lin Htet realized there had been a coup – and that by cutting internet access, the new junta had thrown the country back into the pre-internet era.

For months the military had been questioning the results of the November 2020 election, won in a landslide by Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy. The coup took place on the day the new parliament was due to be sworn in.

In the early hours of the morning, the junta had sent soldiers to the country’s internet providers to force engineers to shut down connections to the outside world. It was the first stage of a digital coup designed to exert control over communications by slowing and strategically shutting off the internet.

Nathan Maung was another Burmese journalist who recalls the confusion and disbelief on the day of the military takeover. “The internet was out.” He looked for his most recent texts – “The last messages from my friends said, ‘Sh!t happened’. I have no clue what sh!t happened.”

The whole country had been plunged into an information black hole.

‘Cloak of darkness’

From Ukraine to Myanmar, government-run internet outages are picking up pace around the world. In 2021, there were 182 shutdowns in 34 countries, according to Access Now, a non-government organization that tracks connectivity around the world. Countries across Africa and Asia have turned to shutdowns in a bid to control behavior, while India, largely in the conflict-ridden region of Jammu and Kashmir, plunged into digital darkness more times than any other last year.

The increasing use of the kill switch underlines a deepening global trend towards digital authoritarianism, as governments use access to the internet as a weapon against their own people. Internet shutdowns have also become a modern canary in the coalmine.

“The internet going off is well known in many countries to be a sign or a signal that something bad is about to happen,” says Simon Angus, an economist from Monash University whose Monash Internet Observatory tracks global internet connectivity in real time. “That seems to be aligned closely with human rights abuses because it really is a cloak of darkness.”

And with this 'Not the Bee' story comparing biden's 'internet kill switch' to 'Order 66' of Star Wars and 'Darth Sidious' proclaiming to "Execute Order 66," for those who are unaware.:

Order 66, also known as Clone Protocol 66, or simply "the Order," was one of top-secret contingency orders that identified all Jedi as traitors to the Galactic Republic and, therefore, subject to summary execution by the Grand Army of the Republic.

The order was programmed into the Grand Army clone troopers through behavioral modification biochips implanted in their brains, making it almost impossible for the clones to disobey the command to turn against their Jedi Generals.

The Kaminoan scientists who designed the clone troopers believed it was only to be used as a contingency protocol against renegade Jedi. In secret, Order 66 was the means by which the Sith intended to bring about the long-awaited fall of the Jedi Order.

As this Guardian story also pointed out, the impacts of the internet being shutdown by various governments are widespread and severe, effecting just about every area of life, with the internet being 'shut down' suddenly casting the people of a country back into the 'pre-internet era'. Can you imagine if suddenly and without warning, you no longer had any internet service, and could not reach any websites at all, including your bank account, your electricity provider, none of them?

Without an internet, you can almost guarantee the globalists would have been able to get a much higher percentage of Americans and people around the world to 'take the kill shot,' too, if there weren't an endless number of people 'dying suddenly,' captured on video for the whole 'awakened' world to see.

So would you put it past 'biden' and his 'Grand Army clone troopers' from 'flipping the switch' if they found out that things were going to come crashing down all around them? As we've warned many times on ANP, we truly believe that if this 'cabal' found out they were going to be held accountable for their crimes of treason and genocide, they'd 'burn it all down' so they'd NEVER be held accountable.

So why now, all of a sudden and out of the blue, and at a time when the world is falling apart all around them, and they're rushing insanely into another World War, is Rand Paul suddenly warning about joe biden and his cabal having an 'internet kill switch'? We pray that everybody is prepared for the madness to come because its looking more and more like everything's ready to 'go hot' in the coming days. In the 2nd video below, Mike Adams talks with us about the absolutely critical importance of health and nutrition in this day and age we live in as the world rushes into more war and never-ending chaos.

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/Internet...l_Mine.php

Internet Censorship Reaching Epic Proportions As Globalists Censor 'How To Forecast An Earthquake' As Part Of Big Tech's Efforts To Silence Independent And Conservative Voices
By Alan Barton -  All News Pipeline
October 26, 2023

We all know that the world is pushing for more censorship on the internet, and that is actually happening. Let me show you one very recent example of this using an online entity that many of us that are interested in earthquakes and related topics love to watch. I have posted many times his YT videos on earthquakes, prognostications and explanations of related topics such as heat markers showing up near volcanic active regions that the government services show as fires yet they deny that those fires exist. Except for those times when they do exist, which they hate admitting. Yep, if you guessed Dutchsinse you get the gold medal for the day.

It has been about two weeks since his last video and although that occasionally occurs, he is very good at keeping new activities posted on his YouTube channel and almost daily updates on his Twitch feed. For a better idea of what I am speaking about, let’s do a step by step of the timeline on how I got to this present point. Not having watched any of his YouTube updates for a couple weeks, I decided to see if he had any that I somehow missed and when I got to his YT channel I found a link to his newest from one day ago (this being Wednesday October 25th as I write) and is given as the first video at the bottom. You will note that it is not his usual update but a computer voice reading a statement regarding how to forecast our own earthquakes, also given in text at the extended view of the statement portion of the web page. Fascinating, but also well known to those of us that watch him regularly.

Confused, I looked at his Twitch account that shows his live presentations (the link ishere), and found that it had been four days since his last video was live streamed from there where I watch his live updates when I can. Nothing shown and the only notice is the standard one saying he is offline. So I went back to YT and looked through his other tabs and under the Community tab found this interesting bit. First post was the one linking How to Forecast an Earthquake as given in the above paragraph and in the first video below. Second post down shows the same idea. It is the third post that most intrigued me and led to this column. Please allow me to repost the important part here (emphasis is mine):

dutchsinse1 day ago (edited)

    “I am not being allowed access to the internet at all.

    Someone with a lot of authority (gov) or hacking power (criminal) or both have shut down my home connections completely.

    It may be via a court order, idk.

    I'm having to use a different connection just to make this text post here.

    Starlink = off, shut down by someone

    Cable = off, shut down by someone

    DSL = off, shut down by someone Mobile internet not an option living rural in the woods

    Fiber = off, shut down by someone

    Power to home = variable depending on if they can hit all at once. If they can't hit all the internets, they just hit the power to the whole subdivision or just my house.

    In the off-time occasion when I was able to connect, I started using a VPN, they shut those down too, and then my home connection after hitting the VPN connections. 

    I have (had) all the above at once, now I'm down to using a 1 mb phone DSL connection intended for someone else.

    Since I'm reduced down to 1mb per second, I can't stream earthquake information or upload HD videos (takes 2 days to upload multiple Gigabyte videos on a slow connection).

    Law enforcement won't help and isn't interested... which makes me think it’s authorized by the gov or a court order. Just guessing on that.

    NO earthquake info coming in, no info going out. It's done.

    This is being done to me by what I consider to be straight up evil people.”

Agreed sir.

His Twitter feed is blank, his FaceBook page is blank, nothing on Instagram (maybe because I have no accounts with any of them?).

Let’s take another look at some of the reasons he suspects may be the problem as he mentioned above. With Starlink, Cable, DSL and Fiber internet links shut down, we can assume that it is far more than just a normal interruption of service; rather it is an intentional denial of service. The fact that it appears that he tried them and then noted that he tried a VPN and then his home connection was shut down appears to be a coordinated attack on his personal communications via the web. That is a complete denial of service, not just slowing his connections or stopping one aspect or another. That is a methodical and coordinated attack, and I assume his thoughts that it is government are most likely correct. Whether from the U.S. Geological Survey NEIC getting angry about his constant showing that they lie about real earthquakes and even changing the numbers and censoring them so that he does not have correct data to try and dislodge his very accurate forecasting (that so embarrasses them “professionals”) or perhaps something in the asides that he mentions that may infuriate other government agencies – let’s give one example. The satellite video proof that they are testing/using space based high energy weapons that he later refused to even speak about from fear they would get after him but still pointed out that something looks weird here and there. There is a web page that has a few of his best ideas shown and one portion especially geared specifically towards that concept or Directed Energy Weapons. There are many pages of these things and if you have not watched them, you may want to do so quickly before they are scrubbed. The direct link is here. One of his more interesting videos that shows inconsistencies in the official stories of heat flare-ups and DEW weapons testing/usage is the second one below, found on page two of the above link.

Perhaps some large corporations and gov agencies are angry that he proves that mass drill sites (oil, gas steam, radioactive waste and fracking injection sites) and geothermal generation areas are more often hit and that earthquakes follow the very high tension power lines and generation locations. Maybe showing the near perfectly coordinated massive fire attacks in California, Canada, and elsewhere had someone that is starting those fires upset. Or perhaps “they”, whoever the hell “they” are, do not want him noticing and advertising something that they may have planned and want to censor anyway of alerting the general public that something is being done to harm them. Suggestive ideas abound, and we may be seeing soon enough if anything in that idea has validity.

https://earthquakes.berkeley.edu/map/index.html

There are various websites that show recent earthquake activity and we can all check in on them to see for ourselves what and where they are occurring, and various feeds from different nations produce different results not just in slight variations in magnitude, but more importantly some censorship by one agency (usually the USGS it appears) of certain quakes or another so it is wise to check more than one source. One that I like to reference is the University of Berkley Seismology Lab map as it shows the majority of them, with the news ones marked by color if they are from the past hour, past day, or past week. That map can be found here.

Another aspect of the internet censoring is included in the usual ANP Emergency Fundraiser where they state “The globalists war on ANP is all part of the globalists 'Big Tech' effort to silence conservative and independent voices, allowing them to maintain a monopoly on the flow of information. As George Orwell made clear to us decades ago, "The further a society drifts from the truth, the more they will hate those who speak it." But, with your amazing help, we at ANP promise to keep 'speaking truth to power' because, as Orwell also reminded us, "If liberty means anything at all it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."  And as I normally do, the emphasis is mine for purposes of this column. It appears that Dutchsinse has told of things that someone does not want us to hear. That also works in the reverse order; they can track back to you and get after you for what they do not want you to see but that is easily corrected and effective in most instances if cone correctly. Although there is no method that can absolutely secure your web gazing as attested by the war against Edward Snowman, there are various techniques that can eliminate most tracking of what stories you want to read and what sites you want to peruse.

Briefly, the strategy of hiding your personal identity on the internet means not doing things that can be easily traced. Using a VPN (Virtual Private Network) to hide you own computers unique identity by passing through other servers that produce new ID’s is the easy way for casual usage. For a bit more privacy, use the Onion webs TOR browser (The Onion Router) that randomizes and hides your identity well. For further protection, us a VPN to access TOR and very few would have the ability to break down who you are and where you may be located. For even more security, use virtual machines to hide your computer along with the aforementioned methods and leave no traces of any browsing history, as Edward Snowdon does. Virtual machines can be loaded on a thumb drive and you can boot your computer using the operating system on the thumb drive. There are special OP systems that are made for just this purpose. This can all be defeated if you do stupid things like giving out your ID while online or logging into our accounts, and do not join any blogs or such while connected securely. Even things like using full screen can give away what computer you may be using because they can trace who uses screens with those resolutions. But for normal usage, just using a VPN and using something like the Brave browser and its built in TOR private window can help for non-critical usage.

I am not going to go through a full description of how to do those things so you can look it up for yourselves. Step by step procedures are all over the internet on how to stay secure but remember, like I said before, even Edward Snowdon was caught and he used the most secure options available. Let’s just hope that you are not wanted as badly by the feds as he was; it took the CIA a lot of time on the world’s most powerful super computers to figure out how to catch him, and are you wanted that much to account for millions spent in super computer usage to find? In most instances you can research what the government and secret societies are doing to us using just the normal security measures of a VPN and maybe a TOR browser. There are also secure email methods, but that will have to depend on your own research as well.
Whatever the cause of Dutch’s disappearance from the web, it can happen to anyone, even ANP and all of us individually.
God Bless

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTONWLDIpQs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqYE1Pi334I

https://www.allnewspipeline.com/Internet...rtions.php

https://rumble.com/v3rb1b1-video-top-glo...anity.html