Icke

[xanthas]

Far as Xanthas- if you thought I was lecturing you, well, I wasn't. I was posing a question, not just directed at you, but in general. which is what forums are about?

Along with Andrea, I was wondering what being Jewish had to do with a David Icke thread. I was asking for clarity and opinions.  

The reason I mentioned how long I have been a member is made clear in that post.

No need for the attack type response? I was not attacking you.

If you say so. I'm not digging in my heels. Feel free to feel attacked. It wasn't my intention, but I'm not interested in getting into a funk over a reply to somebody else's comment.

Maybe it is an opportunity to reflect on why you came across as lecturing me?

As can be seen via your reply, you maintain the same vibration.

I couldn't care less as far as religions or religious programming & [color="#0055aa"]indoctrination[/color] are concerned because they have created more misery, bloodshed, hatred, heartache and separation than politics ever did.

Unfortunately a lot of Jewish people are serious pains-in-the bums. I worked with Israelis both in the US as well as in my country of residence and they unfortunately 'lived up' to their negative reputation. I also lived in a Jewish community in London and the very same exact 'modus operandi'. Very unappealing, to say the least.

We are Goyim to them after all. If you are Jewish maybe it is an opportunity to ponder if it is a genuinely humane (compassionate) mind-heart-soul 'teaching'... allowing all  to be equal and not 'expulsed' or 'rejected' friendship or refused inclusion because 'the others' are not "like us". Thank God there are Jewish people that are against Israhell as well as Zionism - they are what I feel to still be genuinely in line with their teachings - even if that restricts them still within their respective line of faith.

Christian indoctrination is just as bad - the child abuse sex scandals over the last few years that were 'condoned' by the Roman Catholic church are nothing to be boasting about or proud of - not to mention that the Vatican allowed a lot ex-Nazis to be 'shipped over' from Germany to the US, and so many 'conquistadores robbing the indigenous nations and peoples of their inner connection to their own spiritual heritage in the name of 'Crown and Church' is absolutely horrifying..

Religion and their extention - 'purity of race' (being "Jewish" or Sunnyi or whatever else...) - is the shield by which one can commit crimes as much as Catholic or Buddhist monks (yep, there are also violent Buddhists - alas!), or or any other of the many religious sects or their gurus, leaders and 'special agents' such as David Icke - as an Illuminati disinformer - or Alex Jones.

It's the old adage of 'divide and conquer'.

Your comment proves you stepped right into that trap.

The mindf*cks are the same across the board - none is 'better' or 'worse'. The result can be seen here as we speak.

Good weekend to you Lone Wolf.

We're all on the same journey to wake up to our own BS and delusions...

Every day.

[Lone Wolf]

Xanthas

I was a member of a certain "cult", the leader of which used to say to anyone who confronted him or made a comment that he didn't like, that they needed to look at themselves as to the origin of their comments. That's how he would deflect any inquiry and he rarely owned anything. Again, I did not judge you. I merely asked a question. Please do not judge me, (or my "energy") or tell me what I need to look at.

 

[xanthas]

Please do not judge me, (or my "energy") or tell me what I need to look at.

It is not so much 'judging' as not responding in the same fashion.

Your emphasising that you've been a member since 2005 carried within it the energetic imprint that conveyed something to the order of 'Well, I've been here longer than you and who are you to tell me xyz' (authority) - slightly patronising, even if that was not your intention.

Besides, you took issue with the fact that I replied to Auriga, insisting it had nothing to do with DI. I was merely making a comment to their response. Why you re-acted to that (because it was specifically addressed to Auriga, not anybody else necessarily) has led to where we are now.

Strange or what? Looping about issues, becoming 'distracted' ends up in rhetorical fisty fights that add nothing constructive to the debate. It's silly really. Let's just forget this and get over ourselves, eh?;) We are on the same page after all (i.e., this website....!icon_computer)

[Lone Wolf]

Ok, Xanthas,

It's forgotten.

[xanthas]

BTW, I love wolves... :)

[Lone Wolf]

Yeah, I love them too. Awesome creatures! I have a dog that looks sorta like a black mini wolf. He's a Schipperke. :)

[Mercy Now]

[user=1710]Auriga[/user] wrote:

Icke, The Swerdlows, Alex Jones, etc. are all CIA operations, some with their awareness and some without.   

And other international intelligence agencies.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACdY4C1hV...re=related

note...1:33-@1:50



http://www.scribd.com/doc/33083790/Chang...titute-SRI



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tp5XyjKsV...er&list=UL

[Auriga]

Thanks for posting those videos Mercy Now. What I've experienced is if you have a good website/forum discussing conspiracy material, that often 'agents' will come on there, become members and try to infiltrate your board and try to steer it in a certain direction. Often they will do this by intrducing a new philosphy different than the prevailing one on the board that seems to make more sense. Many people latch to it and it becomes the dominant theme of the board. Then if someone tries to introduce something else they are 'policed' by the members because their ideas are 'outdated' or whatever. It's quite clever how this is done.

[PurplePebble]

[user=1710]Auriga[/user] wrote:

Thanks for posting those videos Mercy Now. What I've experienced is if you have a good website/forum discussing conspiracy material, that often 'agents' will come on there, become members and try to infiltrate your board and try to steer it in a certain direction. Often they will do this by intrducing a new philosphy different than the prevailing one on the board that seems to make more sense. Many people latch to it and it becomes the dominant theme of the board. Then if someone tries to introduce something else they are 'policed' by the members because their ideas are 'outdated' or whatever. It's quite clever how this is done.

What I like about this forum, is that the information posted here at times raises a lot of important questions about the people who claim to be one thing, when they are clearly another....

What I especially like about the forum, is that there are posters here who have plenty of proof that their experiences and insights are valid, real and authentic when it comes to some of the people in question.

And exposing them.

Without getting censored or banned for doing it.

I for one have had a lot of questions and have had the answers confirmed by other members post's here..

I value that. Any covert distractions and attempts to pollute the truth are stopped. Spies and infiltrators are stopped in their tracks for the best part

And if the members on this forum might have overlooked a few, then those that are overlooked will hang themselves in the end . We ain't scared of you fuckers . Got it?

[Auriga]

[user=1710]Auriga[/user] wrote:

Thanks for posting those videos Mercy Now. What I've experienced is if you have a good website/forum discussing conspiracy material, that often 'agents' will come on there, become members and try to infiltrate your board and try to steer it in a certain direction. Often they will do this by intrducing a new philosphy different than the prevailing one on the board that seems to make more sense. Many people latch to it and it becomes the dominant theme of the board. Then if someone tries to introduce something else they are 'policed' by the members because their ideas are 'outdated' or whatever. It's quite clever how this is done.

What I like about this forum, is that the information posted here at times raises a lot of important questions about the people who claim to be one thing, when they are clearly another....

 

Yeah, like the Swerdlows. ;)