Icke

[Mercy Now]

[user=1710]Auriga[/user] wrote:

Thanks for posting those videos Mercy Now. What I've experienced is if you have a good website/forum discussing conspiracy material, that often 'agents' will come on there, become members and try to infiltrate your board and try to steer it in a certain direction. Often they will do this by intrducing a new philosphy different than the prevailing one on the board that seems to make more sense. Many people latch to it and it becomes the dominant theme of the board. Then if someone tries to introduce something else they are 'policed' by the members because their ideas are 'outdated' or whatever. It's quite clever how this is done.

Yes Auriga there's that to some degree.

When folks become disgruntled, disappointed the most common tactic is to steer to a change of management.

It's the same company. The facade is different ,
sometimes different words,in some cases more dazzling technology or special effects but the same wizards behind the curtain.

Same farm ,different barn.

[Mercy Now]

Oh ..FWIW..."StarSeed" is agency speak.

[Auriga]

[user=1710]Auriga[/user] wrote:

Thanks for posting those videos Mercy Now. What I've experienced is if you have a good website/forum discussing conspiracy material, that often 'agents' will come on there, become members and try to infiltrate your board and try to steer it in a certain direction. Often they will do this by intrducing a new philosphy different than the prevailing one on the board that seems to make more sense. Many people latch to it and it becomes the dominant theme of the board. Then if someone tries to introduce something else they are 'policed' by the members because their ideas are 'outdated' or whatever. It's quite clever how this is done.

When folks become disgruntled, disappointed the most common tactic is to steer to a change of management.

 

Well I wasn't talking about disgruntled members, I was talking about people put there on purpose to disrupt the forum.

 

 

[Mercy Now]

[user=1710]Auriga[/user] wrote:

[user=1710]Auriga[/user] wrote:

Thanks for posting those videos Mercy Now. What I've experienced is if you have a good website/forum discussing conspiracy material, that often 'agents' will come on there, become members and try to infiltrate your board and try to steer it in a certain direction. Often they will do this by intrducing a new philosphy different than the prevailing one on the board that seems to make more sense. Many people latch to it and it becomes the dominant theme of the board. Then if someone tries to introduce something else they are 'policed' by the members because their ideas are 'outdated' or whatever. It's quite clever how this is done.

When folks become disgruntled, disappointed the most common tactic is to steer to a change of management.

 

Well I wasn't talking about disgruntled members, I was talking about people put there on purpose to disrupt the forum.

 

 

Yes I understood that completely. I simply pointed out a common tactic used .

[Auriga]

[user=1710]Auriga[/user] wrote:

[user=1710]Auriga[/user] wrote:

Thanks for posting those videos Mercy Now. What I've experienced is if you have a good website/forum discussing conspiracy material, that often 'agents' will come on there, become members and try to infiltrate your board and try to steer it in a certain direction. Often they will do this by intrducing a new philosphy different than the prevailing one on the board that seems to make more sense. Many people latch to it and it becomes the dominant theme of the board. Then if someone tries to introduce something else they are 'policed' by the members because their ideas are 'outdated' or whatever. It's quite clever how this is done.

When folks become disgruntled, disappointed the most common tactic is to steer to a change of management.

 

Well I wasn't talking about disgruntled members, I was talking about people put there on purpose to disrupt the forum.

 

 

Yes I understood that completely. I simply pointed out a common tactic used .

 


Okay. I see.

 

 

[Mercy Now]

And another FYI....

"New Earth" = agency speak.

Sift it out for yourself.

[Hissil]

I really enjoyed reading Icke's newest book. Learned a lot from it. The first 200 pages are pretty much dedicated to exposing zionism and explaining how jews are not semites.

[Andrea]

[user=1314]Hissil[/user] wrote:

I really enjoyed reading Icke's newest book. Learned a lot from it. The first 200 pages are pretty much dedicated to exposing zionism and explaining how jews are not semites.

Well I guess I should read that book because I don't get this. Jews are not semites or zionists are not semites?

BY THE WAY : what is a zionist? EXACTLY.....
This is a very ambiguous word to me and I am asking for clarity.

[Richard]

A Zionist is a follower of the political movement of Zionism — the effort to support and establish, or continue to support, the state of Israel. In parts of the Old Testament, or Torah, both Jerusalem and Israel are referred to as Zion. Zionism, the idea of providing an independent Jewish nation, began in the 19th century with the writings of journalists like Theodor Herzl. However, the idea that the state of Israel belongs to the Jewish people dates well before that. Judaism was born in the area now known as Israel and, as a result, Jews dating well before the common era (CE) claim Israel as their home.

The bottom line is Zionist believe it's ok to steal land from the Palestinians and claim it for themselves. Pretty much the same thing Americans did to the native Americans.

[Andrea]

Thanks Richard. Someone told me Zionists are people who say they are Jews in order to disguise their true identity, or to gain whatever benefits they can as a Jew..