Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What Was Stewart's Purpose in Your Life?
#31
[color=#0000ff Wrote:iqhunk[/color]]

Janet has never had her detailed natal chart made, Linda dedicated most of her life to Astrology.

I have done her chart, and I do see the similarities between the two women, it’s just that they have totally different philosophy which makes it hard for me to compare them at all. However I do get your point.
Reply

#32
I do not intend to disrespect anyone but I am human and I will say I have issues getting over many things in my life and I want to move on and heal...I saw a post here implicating how we shouldn't trash the ones we learn from...but its a fine line from where though we may see that logically, maybe emotionally I may not be resolved in it a peaceful way.
I was drawn to this thread...its clear I have not worked on reconciling this thoroughly within myself.
I devoted several years of my life to studying their stuff..but now I no longer do it, yet there are things that they have taught everyone that I adhere to...
yes I believe in self responsibility, being your own guru, following your inner direction on whats right to eat...and that ultimately all things are neutral(I'm learning shiatsu and chinese theory..we learn that same thing in different words..about yin and yang that are two supposedly polar opposites--yet they're intermingling into oneness so that there really is no polarity in everything..if you break it down--its neutral..this i have experienced..after years of reading..i have experiential knowledge that for me its my perception and emotional reaction to things that define everything in my mind).

i have never met them--but there was a tie there--why was i drawn to them to begin with. not sure if i ever will meet them properly. and i know now that i won't go back to studying their teachings.----i dont believe in many things they talk about..its my choice...and my life in some ways(despite current difficulties) is better in that way.

a part of me is like this: even if i cut off ties with people, a part of me still would love it if things were resolved/reconciled.....that i'd still be somehow in contact with everyone later on..when i've figured it out, found whatever it is that i wanted--when i grow up--when i've gotten to a better level in my life(what appears better)...and that i can view the other person in a different light..they can view me in a different light. i make this as a general statement...yet i also know about attachment...and the contrary that everyone is a part of this grand scheme of things(the universe) and that all is connected.

there were my two cents here...
if my heart could really emanate love and peace beyond words just typed routinely on this screen...then so be it.
peace and love
Reply

#33
Hello PP,

How are you, you have just reminded me that we have not spoke for some time.

Nicely written and very happy to hear that you are doing so much with yourself and progressing in leaps and bounds.
Reply

#34
plus one to what Aj said to PP  :)
Reply

#35
[color="#0000ff Wrote:iqhunk[/color]]Hi Karen,
I agree with you that this is a polarized topic.

I dont want to say that the Swerdlows are angels but merely that it is unfair to label them as satanic. I dont think anyone here who has tried a regression can affirm that they have spent all their lifelines without causing harm to others. If we are on Earth, we have done something terrible in one or more lifelines.


I wish to substantiate on Janet and Linda, Linda in Star Signs and Janet in Decoding your Life (the work started in 1986 almosty parallel to Star Signs.)

1. Linda Speaks of Higher Self outside of the body connected by a cord. Janet calls this Oversoul.

2. Both speak of reincarnation, in the end of the book, Linda calls it "Simultaneous" and "Lexigrams" it to say that Simultaneous has "No Time" in it. Janet directly calls it simultaneous existence.

3. Color Visualization Therapy has a complete chapter devoted in Star Signs, the exact same as in DCYL.

4. Both advocate affirmations and abundance. Linda specifically speaks of a seedmoney principle of giving
1/3rd extra away whereas Janet speaks of receiving what we put out mentally.

5. Violet is Janet's favourite colour of protection, Linda uses "Purple PLates" of violet colour for magical acts.

6. Both talk of the "Song of the Soul".

Where they differ most outside this body of work:
ASTROLOGY.

Janet has never had her detailed natal chart made, Linda dedicated most of her life to Astrology.

My point is, if we end up trashing Janet's research as satanic, then it trashes Linda's philosophies then Emerson (originator of Higher Self philosophy) and practically most of Higher Self oriented study. Which leaves the non-sheeple with the alternatives like Drunvalvo-Mt Shasta Channeled stuff, Chaos Magickians, OTOs, Masonry, Kundalini Tantrism and the like which are not exactly very beneficial for safe, independent spiritual transformation.

Let us not trash the message because of the messenger's unpopular traits.
Iqhunk, I agree totally with you about reincarnations and no one is really "Satanic" or "Demonic", it is only a 'perceived' state-of-mind. Many, if not ALL Humans in different Life Journeys have done horrendous things, created horrendous actions and so forth, so therefore it is all 'relative' within the mentality of the Lord Creator.
Reply

#36
Hey AJ! I will send you a pm/email when I get the chance...will pm a few others here too.just am busy these days and i stop in here once in a while..ttyl! hope you are well too.

peace and love
Reply

#37
For whatever it is worth, I think without Stewart I'd not be so much diverse in my open-mindedness to spiritual concepts. This maturity of my mind to allow mental synthesis of concepts has allowed me to balance out metaphysical claims for the best ones to test. Then I would hypothesize the mechanics that I can conceive from my past psychic experiences and test the metaphysical claims. In the end, I look more confused than ever, but that's because I'm not blindly accepting what's out there, but proddly testing with whatever means and no compromise with time even if it takes so long that one may mistaken me for confused.
Reply



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 Melroy van den Berg.