https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2022-02-0...me-reality


Uttering the phrase "eugenics program" or "depopulation agenda" is a sure-fire way to get yourself cast as an alt-right conspiracy theorist who listens to misinformation from Joe Rogan en route to driving your 18-wheeler as part of a convoy that's clearly protesting to promote white supremacy. Yet, as is typically the case, the caricaturization of those premises into an idea constructed in the form of a straw man that can easily be defeated is done to control the narrative enveloping those subjects so that they aren't examined in good faith.

Time and time again, these supposed "conspiracy theories" end up becoming ostensible realities. The recent deterioration of diplomatic relations between the United States and Russia illustrates this point in spades. Years, if not weeks or even days ago, anyone forewarning of a "false flag" attack would branded as someone wearing a tinfoil hat who has been watching too much InfoWars. That vapid attempt of character assassination completely rejects any examination about the idea that a nation would stage a crisis to create a cassus belli. In this instance, that tendency to overlook facts to focus on ostracizing dissent occurred time and time against despite the declassification of Operation Northwoods, a document which literally proves the long-standing use of this tactic, years ago. Now, the Pentagon and community of US intelligence agencies have cited the formerly outlandish "conspiracy theory" as a provocation for military engagement against the Russian Federation, an adversary its been guilty of concocting many of its own actual conspiracy theories against. How quickly the tables turn.

With that in mind, it's fair to say that typecasting the idea that a global political entity would be focused on population control as another baseless conspiracy theory without actually investigating the claim would be naive. A premise that was once epitomized by outlandish things like speculation of Operation Bluebeam unfolding or FEMA camps emerging ends up being, as typically is the case, rooted in a nuanced explanation emerging from an examination of events in recent history.

The global response to the COVID-19 pandemic since 2020 puts the once veiled facts surrounding organized efforts at population control into the plain light of day. Appropriately, many of the supranational non-governmental organizations, government officials, and magnates of industry who have been entrusted as the leaders tasked with constructing a pandemic response have evident ties to a worldview and political ideology that centers around the need population control enacted through global governance.

The World Economic Forum's unexpected rapid ascent following its surreptitious origin in 1971 was accelerated by the influence of another NGO veiled in secrecy: The Club of Rome. The club was founded in 1968 by the duo of Aurelio Peccei and Alexander King who themselves held ties to the Bilderberg Group that was created in 1954. The central tenant motivating the two to found the Club of Rome was Peccei’s philosophical world view which he succinctly titled Problematic. In essence, Peccei’s ideology viewed the disparate problems afflicting humanity as a singularity which needed to be controlled accordingly by constructing a comparably monolithic global political apparatus tasked with arriving at a resolution. Core components of the WEF platform espoused today from environmental crises, poverty, disease, and population size, originate from the Club of Rome’s intent to envelop every crisis facing humanity to act as the crucible through which a future molded to serve their interests would emerge from.

The focus on global population growth became an especially important focus of the Club of Rome that lead it to assimilate its own interests with Schwab’s burgeoning World Economic Forum in its early days. Though its first meeting in Davos in 1971 was convened under the WEF’s initial moniker, the European Management System, Schwab’s political ties to the likes of his Harvard mentor Henry Kissinger to European Commissioner for Economic and Financial Affairs Raymond Barre would prove to be invaluable as the conference attracted approximately 450 attendees from countries around Europe as well as the United States despite the organization's nascent state. This auspicious beginning, coupled with the WEF’s pan-European political ideology garnered the attention of those leading the Club of Rome.

By 1973, now operating under the title of the World Economic Forum, Aurelio Peccei used the third annual Davos’ conference as an opportunity to advance the theories set forth in a 1972 report commissioned by the Club of Rome titled The Limits to Growth. The report (abstract available here) was authored by Donella and Dennis Andrews along with Jørgen Randers and William W. Behrens III, who represented a team of 17 researchers who were acolytes of MIT scientist Jay Forrester. Limits to Growth was a seminal work examining the problematic consequences of population growth accelerated by the technological and industrial achievements of modernity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qdzpppzLM0

Peccei, a man who would refer to the huddled masses whose fate he fought to control as "peasants," would harness the neo-Malthusian perspective asserted in The Limits of Growth at the WEF's third annual meeting. Actionably, the Club of Rome co-founder would use the report as the basis for advocating the need for an adaptive political model for global governance that would reorganize the world into ten political and economic regions laid out in a subsequent report published in 1973 titled Rationalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System authored by Eduard Pestel and Mihajlo Mesarovic. This report laid out a structure of global political governance which the World Economic Forum itself has become a harbinger of, all made possible by its ingratiation into the Club of Rome’s axis following Peccei’s keynote address at Davos that Schwab would recollect years later as one of the most formative events in his organization’s history.

The Club of Rome’s philosophy on global governance as a mechanism of population control is evident in everything from Schwab’s theory of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to the WEF’s leading role in organizing a global pandemic response. In order to construct the model for global governance deemed to be essential to addressing the global Problematic, the WEF launched its Forum of Global Young Leaders to mold many who would become leaders of industry, academia, and politics. The indoctrination of the worldview shared by the WEF and Club of Rome has influenced alumni of the WEF’s Forum of Global Young Leaders including French President Emmanuel Macron, New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, and former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, among others.

In 2017, Schwab would wax poetically about that amalgam of his alumni's influence on the global political sphere, admitting they were integral to the WEF strategy of “infiltrating” the cabinets of executive branches of sovereign governments across the world as a mechanism to galvanize those countries under the umbrella of an apparatus for global governance controlled by the WEF and its allies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbVD4tB4cVQ

As evidenced from the pandemic response efforts fledged by each of those aforementioned world leaders, a singular model for governance has been tirelessly advanced by those emissaries of the WEF, even when it violates the constitutions of the nation’s they are elected to lead. The Orwellian landscape of policy making enforcing compulsory vaccinations, enacting government-initiated lock downs, and facilitating massive wealth redistribution following the controlled demolition of economies across the world emerged in lockstep as the events of 2020 unfolded. This confluence of policy making between disparate nations did not emerge by mistake as it’s clear that the leaders of those countries were groomed to act in accordance with the supra-national ideology of the WEF instead of in adherence to the interests of the nations and people they were elected to represent.

In contrast to the idea that a globalist depopulation agenda would be the result of the die-off of billions and billions of people across the world, the actual realization of this pursuit appears to be much more subtle. That realization is also becoming harder and harder to deny. This is demonstrated in part by recent revolutions from England and Wales from the United Kingdom's Office for National Statistics ("ONS"). The ONS recently found that more than 50% of women in England and Wales born in or after 1990 were childless by the time they turned 30 in 2020. The literal majority of 50.1% drastically increased from a rate of just 18% measured in 1971. Additionally, the ONS report chronicles that the average number of children born to that same demographic of women has fallen to its lowest-ever level since record keeping began of 0.96 children per mother. This data from the ONS is a microcosm of the population decline occurring across developed nations the world over.

The reduction of birthrates is one of the many clear ramifications of the misguided pandemic responses executed by countries across the globe. From the harsh economic realities of lockdowns to the impact on reproductive health that COVID-19 vaccines have, it's clear that a multitude of factors are what have effected changes in projected population. Given the Club of Rome's philosophy of Problematic and the globalist political apparatus constructed by the WEF to advance that holistic compass for policy making, its clear that the very fabric of our society has become irrevocably altered by their pervasive influence. The agenda for population control is just one of many missions of that cabal which has been enacted, with others that are perhaps less apparent in this moment certain to be underway concurrently. Though the fruits of that labor have yet to be harvested, the seeds that have been sown. Ultimately, the reality they will bear appears to be another instance a possibility that was once unthinkable ultimately becoming a reality that humanity will find difficult to reconcile.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx2FFPhb...WL&index=6

COVID Cases Inflated for Profit: ‘The Guy Went in for Multiple Gunshot Wounds and he was Coded as COVID’
• Jeanne Stagg, a whistleblower who worked in Inpatient Utilization Management, approached Project Veritas after seeing cases coded as COVID-19 that she says should not have COVID-19 listed as the “primary diagnosis.”
• Stagg: “I’ve tried to raise awareness to my leadership and even with the Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Department, and it just kind of fell on deaf ears.”
• The Chief Medical Officer for United Healthcare of Louisiana (Medicaid) opined in a recorded phone conversation that the Medicaid rate for reimbursement of COVID-19 patients, which is faster and significantly higher, could be the motivation for the improper “primary diagnosis” codes.
•  “Oh, yes. Yeah. I would think that there’s some motivation that it’s driving higher rates of reimbursement or quicker reimbursement, or something, because otherwise there’s no reason to put, you know, something like that as a leading diagnosis in an asymptom-- basically asymptomatic patients,” said Dr. Morial, Chief Medical Officer for United Healthcare of Louisiana.
•    The Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals has suspended utilization review which is the process of determining whether health care is medically necessary for a patient or an insured individual. The whistleblower says this could be a major contributing factor to spikes in COVID numbers, which then influence public health decisions.

[Baton Rouge, La. – Feb. 2, 2022] A source who works for United Healthcare of Louisiana’s Inpatient Utilization Management Department is blowing the whistle on COVID-19 cases possibly being inflated for financial incentive. The brazen instance of such potential abuse was a patient who had multiple gunshot wounds with his primary diagnosis listed as COVID-19.

United Healthcare of Louisiana is the states’ Medicaid arm, and as the whistleblower Jeanne Stagg points out in a conversation with the Chief Medical Officer of United Healthcare of Louisiana, Dr. Julie Morial, there are several financial incentives for hospitals to prefer to code patients as COVID-19 hospitalizations.

“Well maybe that’s… maybe that’s driving some of the motivation,” said Dr. Morial before stating that the Medicaid rate for reimbursement of COVID-19 patients is both higher and faster.

Project Veritas also published footage of a leadership call within United Healthcare of Louisiana wherein the whistleblower’s attempt to discuss the improper primary diagnoses she is seeing was dismissed.

A major element of this story is the fact that recent actions by public officials have allowed the problem to persist, and the whistleblower believes erroneous codes could be the cause of COVID-19 spikes which influence major public health decisions. 

A health plan advisory, which announced that all utilization management for all medical hospitalizations [including but not limited to initial service authorization and concurrent reviews], must be suspended was the action taken -- which is in question.

“Now, this is not specific to COVID-19. This is every single hospital admission. We’re not allowed to do medical necessity review. So, it gives the hospitals free reign to admit anything they want. Code it however they want,” says the whistleblower, Jeanne Stagg.

United Healthcare of Louisiana’s Dr. Morial was contacted for comment on this story and said, “When I see a patient, and if a patient is presenting other symptoms that aren't suggestive of a COVID infection, even though they may test positive for COVID, that's not my primary diagnosis.”

https://truth11.com/2022/02/04/doctors-a...-and-aids/

Doctors are testifying that COVID-19 vaccines are giving people cancer and AIDS
NaturalNews.com / Arsenio Toledo

(Natural News) More individuals fully vaccinated against the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) are developing cancer and even AIDS. This is according to prominent physicians Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko.
Cole, a board-certified pathologist and owner of a diagnostics lab in Idaho, was called to participate in Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson’s Senate panel called “COVID-19: A Second Opinion.”
This discussion panel featured world-renowned doctors and medical experts who were given a chance to provide alternate opinions regarding the experimental and dangerous COVID-19 vaccines. (Related: Fully vaccinated people make up 71% of new cases and 60% of COVID hospitalizations in US.)
Cole, who was originally invited to talk about early at-home COVID-19 treatments, also provided his testimony.
According to Cole, he conducts around 40,000 biopsies a year as a pathologist and he has been seeing more cancers pop up in people who ordinarily would not be susceptible to developing the kinds of cancers he has been seeing. The only similarity between all of these people is that they have all been vaccinated.
Cole collected all of his data and attempted to contact other laboratories to aggregate a bigger dataset. For pointing out what he has observed, Cole said he was ridiculed and maligned.
“I have oncologists, I have radiation oncologists [tell me] ‘I am seeing an uptick in cancers,’ ‘I’m seeing these odd stable cancers take off like wildfires after the vaccines,’” said Cole. “It is happening. We need federal funding. The NIH [National Institutes of Health] isn’t looking at this. Getting a grant to look at anything related to the vaccines is next to impossible.”

This is not the first time Cole has spoken about the rise in cancers among those vaccinated against COVID-19. In Sept. 2021, Cole went viral after a video of him talking about seeing a rise in cancers and autoimmune diseases among the fully vaccinated was made public.
“Since Jan. 1 [2021], in the laboratory, I’m seeing a 20 times increase of endometrial cancers over what I see on an annual basis,” said Cole in the video. “I’m not exaggerating at all because I look at my numbers year over year. I’m like, ‘Gosh, I’ve never seen this many endometrial cancers before.’”
Vaccine’s immunity-killing properties cause immune deficiency problems among the fully vaccinated
On Jan. 11, Zelenko, a Ukrainian-American family physician, was interviewed by Clay Clark, host of the Thrive Time Show on Brighteon.TV to talk about how the fully vaccinated patients he has been seeing are experiencing immune deficiency problems.
“They have AIDS. But it’s not HIV-induced AIDS,” said Zelenko. “HIV damages your killer T cells and weakens your immune system. So, that syndrome is called AIDS. But there are other things that damage your immune system.”
“By taking a shot that damages your natural killer T cells, damages your tumor suppressor genes, what’s happening is your innate immune system is getting shot,” he continued.
Zelenko then explained that this “vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome” is the reason that he and many other doctors have seen a massive surge in debilitating illnesses like cancer, autoimmune diseases and other “opportunistic infections” and conditions like heart attacks, strokes and miscarriages.
Ben Armstrong, a journalist working for the New American pointed out on his show, “The Ben Armstrong Show,” that all of this information blows up the entire narrative people have been fed regarding the COVID-19 vaccines. His hope is for this kind of information to be aired worldwide so that more people can see it.
“But of course, that’s never going to happen. That’s a pipe dream,” he said. “So, we’ll have to push it out grassroots style, as we’ve been doing with the truth the whole time. It’s always through the grassroots, [through] people like you spreading this type of information.”
More related articles:
Leaked DoD database shows U.S. military illnesses skyrocketing due to covid jabs.
Miscarriages and cancer up 300%, neurological problems up 1,000% due to covid “vaccines.”
Government whistleblowers warn about rises in miscarriages and cancer since the introduction of COVID vaccines.
ACT OF WAR: Thanks to covid “vaccines,” the military’s cancer rate has more than TRIPLED.
Mayo Clinic-trained doctor says covid “vaccines” are locking in suppressed immunity, making people more prone to HIV, HPV, shingles, herpes.
Watch the Jan. 25 episode of “The Ben Armstrong Show” detailing how the COVID-19 vaccines make people more susceptible to cancer and AIDS.
This video is from the channel TruthChannel on Brighteon.com.
Learn more about COVID-19 vaccines and how they cause debilitating illnesses at Vaccines.news.


https://truth11.com/2022/02/04/american-...d-madness/

American Teens Stand Up Against Covid Madness
Infowars.com

As protests against Covid lockdowns, vaccine passports, vaccine mandates and other measures spread worldwide, America’s next generation is making its voice heard.
High school students in multiple states are engaging in peaceful civil disobedience to express their disapproval with their schools’ mask mandates.
Footage out of Washington shows a Washougal High School student leading others in a demonstration.
The teen protester told “freshman and sophomore” students to be respectful to teachers when entering the campus without masks on, because, if not, “that makes us look bad.”
“We want this to be a peaceful, respectful movement,” he said to the group. “We are just trying to gain back our rights as citizens. The teachers, in the end, are just doing their jobs, it doesn’t come from them… it comes from the state.”
Next, the high school demonstration spokesperson told his fellow protesters that they want the school’s faculty kick them off campus.
“This sounds bad, but we’re hoping that they kick us out,” he explained. “Because they have to report that attendance to the state. And, if the state sees a day where a hundred kids are absent, they’re going to start asking questions. Our hope is that we can get this going statewide.”
The students acknowledged that they might get into trouble for their stunt, but vowed to continue demonstrating the following day.
“They can get me in trouble, they can suspend me,” the boy speaking to the crowd said. “I don’t care, we’re done with this. And, obviously all of you are too.”
Again, the protest leader reminded students participating to tell teachers “No, thanks” when offered a mask and to “go home” if staff ordered them to.
Video of the crowd attempting to enter the school, being offered face masks, and getting told to leave campus was also uploaded online.

Quote:#WashougalHSWalkout
Looks like this is Part 2
I am not familiar with anyone involved with this video. It popped up on a local Telegram group.
Like everyone else, I am SO impressed by the young man speaking, along with the students who participated from Washougal High School. pic.twitter.com/k6ULXygY15
— Casper the Deplorable Ghost (@XJCasper) February 3, 2022

Quote:Approx count of unmasked students per site in Oakdale Unified
Oakdale high school 200
Oakdale junior high 150
Sierra View Elementary 20
Cloverland Elementary 20
Fair Oaks Elementary 30
Magnolia Elementary 20
They’re threatened with not graduating + not being able to play sports pic.twitter.com/sLXxKFdPqz
— LET THEM BREATHE (@letthem_breathe) February 3, 2022

Kill Shots Murdering the Unborn
Stephen Lendman / stephenlendman
Kill shots are a death sentence for the fetuses of pregnant women.
Defying scientific reality, the Pharma-controlled CDC falsely reported the following last week:
Flu/covid mass-jabbing “is recommended for people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future (sic).”
“People who are pregnant should receive a…booster shot when it’s time to get one (sic).”
“Evidence about the safety and effectiveness of (jabs) during pregnancy has been growing (sic).”
“(D)ata suggest that the benefits of (mass-jabbing) outweigh any known or potential risks of (jabs) during pregnancy (sic).”
“There is currently no evidence that any vaccines, including (flu/covid jabs), cause fertility problems in women or men (sic).”
According to the Pharma-supporting NYT, the industry-controlled CDC “found no evidence that (mass-jabbing) poses serious risks during pregnancy (sic).”
There’s “no evidence that (mass-jabbing) is unsafe during pregnancy (sic).”
“A false claim has been circulating online that (mass-jabbing) will threaten women’s fertility by harming the placenta (sic).”
“(S)tudies show that (mass-jabbing) does not trigger miscarriages (sic).”
“There are no documented risks to the fetus” from jabs (sic).
According to a Pharma-linked obstetrician quoted by the Times:
“Not offering pregnant women the opportunity to be (jabbed) is not a wise strategy (sic).”
A Pharma-linked immunologist the Times quoted defied science by claiming that “women’s lives depend on” jabs (sic).
In its rigged, rushed trials, Pfizer excluded pregnant women for good reason.
I’ve written before about vital analysis conducted by Dr. Jessica Rose, PhD (in computational biology), MSc (in immunology), and BSc (in applied mathematics).
She provided indisputable evidence of devastating harm to health from kill shots, saying the following:
“Analysis suggests that (covid jabs) are likely the cause of reported deaths, spontaneous abortions, and anaphylactic reactions in addition to cardiovascular, neurological and immunological AEs.”
Because of hazards posed by jabs, “extreme care should be taken when making a decision to participate in this experiment” —that’s highly likely to turn out very badly, far worse than already.
Together with researcher Matthew Crawford, she said the following:
“Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database can be used to estimate the number of excess deaths caused by (flu/covid jabs).”
“A simple analysis shows that it is likely that over 150,000 Americans have been killed by (jabs) as of August 28, 2021.”
“Anaphylaxis (a severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction) is a well known side effect” from jabs.
Pharma-controlled CDC VAERS data “underreport(ed) (it) 50X to 123X” — to cover up numbers of deaths from jabs.
Estimates of underreporting and numbers of deaths following jabs “were validated multiple independent ways.”
“There is no evidence that these (jabs) save more lives than they cost.”
“Pfizer’s own study showed that adverse events consistent with (its mRNA jabs) were greater than the lives saved…”
“Without an overall statistically significant all-cause mortality benefit, and evidence of an optional medical intervention, (it’s) likely (that jabs) killed over 150,000 Americans” in 8 months.
Yearend 2021 estimates put the number at over 400,000 after one year of mass-jabbing — in the US alone.
Jabbing “mandates are not justifiable and should be opposed by all members of the medical community.”
“Early treatments using a cocktail of repurposed drugs with proven safety profiles are a safer, more effective alternative which always improves all-cause mortality in the event of infection, and there are also safe, simple, and effective protocols for prophylaxis.”
In late January, Rose’s analysis showed an epidemic of spontaneous abortions from toxins in flu/covid jabs that number over 416,000.
CDC VAERS data reported a tiny fraction of this total.
Commenting on Rose’s analysis, researcher Steve Kirsch called it “medical malpractice to recommend (flu/covid jabs) to pregnant women.”
The Pharma-controlled agency defied indisputable science by calling them safe for most everyone, including in all age groups.
According to a Public Heath and Medical Professionals for Transparency Lawsuit — based on Pfizer’s documents — all pregnant women jabbed with its mRNA drug miscarried.
None gave birth to a live baby.
Claims by the company, the CDC, the NYT and other MSM otherwise on this and related safety issues consistently suppress evidence of devastating harm to health.
Kill shots are designed to cause irreparable harm to health on the phony pretext of beneficial protection not gotten.
In killing over 416,000 fetuses in the US alone — in one year — Pharma firms, their anti-public health handmaidens and MSM press agents are guilty of mass murder.
Original Article: https://stephenlendman.org/2022/02/03/ki...he-unborn/

https://truth11.com/2022/02/04/crimes-ag...redefined/

Crimes Against Humanity Redefined
Stephen Lendman / stephenlendman
All things flu/covid were made-in-the-USA with the worst of diabolical aims in mind.
The mother of all state-sponsored scams inflicted more harm on more people over the past year throughout the US/West alone than all NATO wars on invented enemies combined since the alliance was formed nearly 75 years ago.
Reality about what’s gone on since seasonal flu was renamed covid should terrify everyone.
Eminent Professor of Medicine, practicing physician, public health expert Peter McCullough MD earlier called flu/covid jabs “the most lethal, toxic, biologic agent ever injected into a human body in American history.”
In world history, it should be stressed because what’s going on is happening worldwide.
On Friday, America’s Frontline Doctors for medicine as it should be practiced — for “honest healthcare solutions” over polar opposite practices by US/Western regimes — reported the following:
“Doctored data” show that countless numbers of hospitalized flu/covid patients were misdiagnosed.
Related data leave no doubt mass-jabbing produces diseases instead of protecting against contracting them.
Why does the mask-wearing scam continue?
Dr. Vernon Coleman’s book, titled “Proof that face masks do more harm than good” can be downloaded and read from his website (vernoncoleman.org).
He named a “new disease” he calls “chronic maskitis.”
Wearers self-inflict harm.
Mask-wearing doesn’t protect as falsely promoted.
Coleman cited speech therapists.
They’re “seeing a massive increase in children needing help with delayed speech.”
Masking young children in schools compromises their ability to develop language skills — to communicate properly with others.
Masking in schools at all levels, at work and elsewhere adversely affects interactions with others.
So why does the scam continue?
Why are health-destroying kill shots mandated?
Why do many businesses mandate destruction of health as a condition for employment?
Why does the same apply in other public places?
Why hasn’t mass rebellion arisen to stop the madness once and for all?
According to independent NTD television on Wednesday:
US attorneys “report(ed) an alarming uptick in calls for help from families of patients hospitalized with” what’s diagnosed as flu/covid — true or false.
Some family members “were arrested after trying to visit a loved one or speak with a doctor after communications with the hospital were cut off.”
Attorneys explained a range of draconian abuses.
They include “hospitals preventing visits from family, failing to provide nutrition and fluids, and coercing patients to agree to (health-destroying) treatments they’d already refused multiple times.”
Attorney Jeff Childers explained the following:
“In many cases, hospitals refused to release the patient, citing their unstable condition, meaning that at some point it can become impossible to get off the (flu/covid) express” to oblivion.
“The most common complaints we get include that patients are being pressured to accept (health-destroying) remdesivir.”
They’ve “been (involuntarily) given (the drug) even though they objected to it, or the hospital will not administer alternative widely-used treatments even though the patient is in critical condition where side effects are less risky than imminent death.”
“I have personally seen hospitals spend tens of thousands of dollars on lawyers to keep patients in their facility.”
What’s going on throughout the US is “medical kidnapping” — including by the Mayo Clinic and other top-rated hospitals.
It’s slow-motion, state-sponsored murder on an unparalleled scale.
US hospitals nationwide are complicit with the highest of high crimes.
They’re hazardous to the health and well-being of patients diagnosed as ill from flu/covid.
Included are countless numbers who’ve been misdiagnosed — to artificially inflate numbers for greater compensation gotten.
Hospitals are financially incentivized to maximize numbers of flu-covid patients — including by inventing them.
So unrelated illnesses are included. Any will do.
Whistleblower nurse Jeanne Stagg explained the following to Project Veritas:
Flu/covid cases are invented for maximum profits.
One patient was admitted “for multiple gunshot wounds and was coded as” flu/covid.
Raising the issue with superiors “fell on deaf ears,” she explained.
Misdiagnoses in large measure come from false positive test results.
A personal note. In January 2021 I dodged a bullet.
Hospitalized for a possible blood clot not found, I was administered a PCR test.
What could have produced a false positive was negative.
No reason was found to keep me hospitalized.
In around 48 hours, I was discharged and back home, none the worse for wear.
It might have been otherwise.
I easily could have been misdiagnosed, prevented from leaving and heavily pressured to take drugs I’ve written about and know harm health.
I dread becoming ill enough to need inpatient care.
If occurs for any reason, I might not survive draconian mistreatment — what’s more likely than my year ago experience.
For inpatients diagnosed ill with flu/covid — right or wrong — US hospitals are killing fields, not institutions of healing with the rights of patients in mind.
They’re prisons that profit hugely by keeping maximum numbers of patients interned for what’s diagnosed as flu/covid.
Incentivized by a bonanza of big bucks to go along with the worst of things for patients comes at the expense of medicine as it should be practiced.
That’s the disturbing reality of what’s been going on for over two years.
If ever a popular revolution was needed to turn things around, it’s now.
Original Article: https://stephenlendman.org/2022/02/04/cr...redefined/

https://rielpolitik.com/2022/02/03/big-p...es-deaths/

INSURANCE: A FOLLOW UP
The last two weeks we have spent some time looking at the health insurance industry with particular focus on the campaign of… ahem, injections.
The UK government now oddly admits that vaccines have damaged the natural immune system of those who have been double-vaccinated. 
(Also Read: Vaccinated people are walking biological time bombs…- By Mike Adams @ https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-03-26-s...ombs.html#

The UK government has admitted that once you have been double-vaccinated, you will never again be able to acquire full natural immunity to Covid variants… or possibly any other virus.
Do we now get a “real” pandemic? In its Week 42 “COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report”, the UK Department of Health admits on page 23, that “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of vaccination.” 
It goes on to say that this drop in antibodies is essentially permanent. What does this mean? We know that vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus (indeed, the report elsewhere shows that vaccinated adults are now much more likely to be infected than unvaccinated ones).
The Brits now find that the vaccine interferes with the body’s ability to make antibodies after infection not only against the spike protein but also against other parts of the virus.
In particular, vaccinated people do not appear to form antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein, the envelope of the virus, which is a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people. In the long term, the vaccinated are far more susceptible to any mutations in the spike protein, even if they have already been infected and cured once or more. The unvaccinated, on the other hand, will gain lasting (if not permanent) immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being naturally infected with it even once.
Sure, we don’t expect the corrupt media to cover this, but it’s there for us to read in the government’s own reports. What’s been stunning to watch during the last two years is how the government’s various bodies put out data, independent non-mainstream journalists report on it and are immediately censored, demonized, and/or discredited with hit pieces done, while the MSM ignores it and instead provides narratives that are completely opposite.
It is, therefore, crucial to read the source material yourself so as to not be hoodwinked by propaganda.
The first insurance companies may well be the first to bring this into the open as they’ve real money at stake, and I can’t see them coughing up for claims which threaten their existence.
Here, take a look… over in the land of the guillotine an insurance company has been backed up in court after refusing to pay out a life insurance policy after the insured died from the vaccine.
Here it is important to understand legal precedent.[/url]
Remember the “conversation” you had after telling your wife you’d be back for dinner, only to then spend the night having beers with your friends, stumbling in at 2am?
Yeah, that’s a precedent set.
Courts are like that, too. Once courts have established reasoning and subsequent judgements, these are relied upon in future legal battles. In short, they form the established norms.
It is therefore highly probable that in France at least deaths resulting from vaccines will be treated as suicides.
The court allegedly justified its ruling as follows:

Quote:The side effects of the experimental vaccine are published and the deceased could not claim to have known nothing about it when he voluntarily took the vaccine. There is no law or mandate in France that compelled him to be vaccinated. Hence his death is essentially suicide.

https://rielpolitik.com/2022/02/02/high-...-genocide/


Will The “Dirty 16” Be Convicted of Genocide?
Neenah Payne




By Neenah Payne
The following articles show a growing case against those who implemented the COVID “health” policies:

1. Will Shocking Discovery End COVID Coup Now?
   
2. Congress Demands Info On Fauci’s COVID Funding Role
   
3. COVID Premeditated Mass Murder Case Against Big Pharma?
   
4. Why Joe Rogan’s Interviews on Mass Psychosis “Broke The Internet”
   

1. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID
   
2. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance
   
3. Bill Gates
   
4. Melinda Gates
   
5. Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
   
6. Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna
   
7. Pascal Soriot, CEO of AstraZeneca
   
8. Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson & Johnson
   
9. Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO
   
10. Boris Johnson, U.K. prime minister
    
11. Christopher Whitty, U.K. chief medical adviser
    
12. Matthew Hancock, former U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
    
13. Sajid Javid, current U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
    
14. June Raine, U.K. chief executive of Medicines and Healthcare products
    
15. Rajiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation
    
16. Klaus Schwab, president of the World Economic Forum
    

Vaccine Failure Skyrockets To Over 6 Million!
By Dr. Henry Ealy

In This Edition

• Experimental COVID Inoculations have failed to protect over 6 million ‘fully vaccinated’ Americans from infection, an increase of more than 3.5 million confirmed failures in only 1 month and with only 28 state health departments reporting.
  
• More than 138,000 ‘fully vaccinated’ Americans have been hospitalized due to COVID, with only 28 state health departments reporting.
  
• More than 32,000 ‘fully vaccinated’ Americans have died due to COVID, with only 28 state health departments reporting.
  

• In November 2021 there were a grand total of over 1.4 Million confirmed vaccine failures.
  
• By December 2021 that number had grown to almost 2.6 Million confirmed vaccine failures.
  
• And now in January 2022 that number has skyrocketed to more than 6.0 Million confirmed vaccine failures!
  

http://82.221.129.208/

NEW DATA: 1 in 191 people who get the MRNA vax die on the spot

This chart from New Zealand lays it bare. If you get the MRNA shot you have a 1 in 191 chance of dying that day. New Zealand had no Covid, and this chart shows the "above mean" deaths when the shots were administered to the 60+ age group. Supposedly the younger you are, the bigger the chance the shot will kill you to boot. That's why so many athletes are falling over on the field now.

http://198.46.190.126/images/mrnanew.jpg

See all the data HERE.
https://hatchardreport.com/relationship-...mortality/

There is a good Youtube video on this HERE



My comment: I think all of this is lowballing the total (still) but at least this is a fairly good look at what is going on.

Imagine Putin looking at Biden

Imagine him knowing that "Biden" will be "in charge" if there is a war. By the way, Biden did not drive that truck in the recent photo op, it was set up like a drivers ed car and someone else was driving. Biden cannot drive. Putin is watching this charade, no doubt wondering who he will really be going to war with. I think that worries him, everyone has a fear of the unknown.

http://www.jimstone.is/1/bidenbrowse.jpg

VAXTASTROPHE IN THE SKY

This was real easy to fact check, it is legit

I have fact checked this, it is legit. In-flight emergency sqwaks, (sqwak 7700) have indeed increased by about 124X (12,400 percent) since the vax. Gosh, that matches the previous percentage increase of pilot deaths too. Pretty soon we are going to start having planes with both pilot and co-pilot disabled.

A while ago I posted a list of all the commercial pilot deaths post vax. Pilots are quite healthy so usually the list only has a few per year. However, after the vax there were hundreds on the list for 2021, and now we have THIS from a pilot:
"Something HUGE and really scary is going on with aviation. You can see for yourself. I am a former airline captain, I am out of the industry but I still keep tabs of what is going on. I have an app on my phone, it's a free app that you can download yourself, it is called flightradar24. One of the really cool features of this app is you can have alerts set up so if an aircraft somewhere in the world declares an emergency, in the industry we call it squawking 7700, you can get a notification. I've had this app for years and usually you would see one to four emergencies pop up every month. That's how it's always been, aviation is pretty safe, there's not a whole lot of emergencies worldwide on the monthly basis. But over the last couple of months I have been getting notifications sometimes up to 10 times a day. I've already had four this morning! Something huge and scary is going on out there and nobody is talking about it. I am seeing so many aircraft declaring emergencies on a daily basis, and I don't know what is going on. You don't have to believe me, you can download the app for yourself and set up the notifications. A lot of emergencies happening these days, I don't know if I want to fly commercially anymore.

My comment: Posted anonymously but was VERY EASY to confirm. I frequently look at flightradar24. so I suspected this was legit and sure enough, there really are that many planes declaring emergencies. I did not know how many was normal, so I looked for precedent and found it. Normally there really are only a few sqwaks per month, here is a post from six years ago where a pilot is wondering why there were suddenly 1-4 per week. I wonder what he would think of 10 per day. This is on Aviation.stackexchange. before the shot, a few a week was a lot. WTH is going on????

https://www.flightradar24.com/52.8,0.84/8#
https://aviation.stackexchange.com/quest...00-squawks

Partial list of Covid symptoms

If a coffee cup feels warmer than usual in your hands in the morning, You may have Covid. * If you dropped your keys more than normal today, You may have Covid. * If, while running, you notice a pain in your foot from one of the small bones having a stiff joint You may have Covid. * If you think your period was off by a day, You may have Covid. * If your attention is a little off, enough to get honked by a car, You may have Covid * If "the same amount of sugar" tastes a little bit sweeter today, You may have Covid. * If you had trouble getting a jar lid off, You may have Covid. * If anything sounded a little bit louder than usual today, You may have Covid. * If you accidentally locked your keys in the house, It may be because you have Covid. * If the sun really bothers you while driving, especially around sunrise and sunset, You may have Covid. * Did you sneeze? Better get tested for Covid. * If for any reason a certain pair of pants does not fit right today, You may have Covid. * Don't be a super spreader. If you think you are not one, YOU MAY HAVE COVID.

"They" are pulling out all the stops with regard to Covid symptoms now, because the narrative is failing and needs to be rescued any way possible. ADMIT YOU HAVE COVID AND TRUST "THEM" TO FIX IT, because if you don't, BIG BAD RUSSIA is going to send the nukes!!! Then it won't matter if you have Covid!!!

More evidence the Covid narrative is collapsing

The WHO is asking countries to lift travel bans and restrictions, as well as lifting requirements for travelers to be vaxxed

Watch "them" start apologizing to avoid being lynched. Sad thing is that people are probably suckers enough to forgive them. That is definitely a weakness an enemy will exploit.

http://198.46.190.126/images/deadnarrative.png

https://www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-digest...a-60485256

Canada is putting up a barrier around the Parliament building in Ottawa just like the one at the white house

UPDATE: A reader corrected me and said that barrier has been in place since march.

I searched for that and came up with nothing before posting the short video. It seems not all search results are created equal!! I specifically searched for when that wall went in and absolutely no results came back when this reader said it is easy to search. That alone is a big story. However, even if the wall did go up in March, presumably for renovations, it could still be timed to provide protection from public outrage if things boil over, Canada was a LOT worse about pushing the corona scam on the people than the U.S. was, and probably needed a wall sooner. Officially it is for renovations. They have an excuse. Quite convenient.
ORIGINAL POST: I am calling this "credible rumor" but cannot find any MSM source to back it up yet

There is only one reason why such barriers would go up. It is because they expect to need that barrier. Why would they expect to need that barrier? Is it because too many people are going to start dropping dead from the vax? Is it because there will be a war? I doubt that because such a barrier is useless against a real military, that type of barrier is for the little people . . . . .
So what is it? Are they going to release the next plague? Are they going to turn the lights off? WHAT? Any way you cut it, having barriers go up in both the U.S. and Canada is ominous, it proves the barrier at the white house was not a fluke, and that the same fate is planned for both places. They are both expecting the same action. Why?

My guess is there is going to be a LOT of rage soon, once people truly figure out what that vax was and that Covid was cover for an enormous con job. I have been in Ottawa several times and normally you can walk right up to the parliament building (for the Americans who don't know that) it was even more exposed than the white house.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ibdJtaKoqtrB/

NEVER FORGET: THEY KNEW DAMN WELL THAT SHOT WAS ONLY A MURDER WEAPON BEFORE IT EVEN HIT THE SHELVES.

They then censored, banned, de-funded, and slandered ANYONE who dared tried to post about their maimed and dead loved ones in alt and social media, while they murdered, un-licensed and de-platformed any doctor that spoke up well enough to get noticed. They gave ENORMOUS pay to people in the medical field who saw it happen, but were corrupt enough to keep giving the shots because they would get a bonus. Don't go to the hospital now, especially in the U.S. because you are guaranteed to meet a staff that is a morally depraved piece of sh*t that already murdered for money. That is where we are at. A "recall" is simply not going to cut it.

And NO, the Jews did not get the MRNA shot in Israel, it is well known there were 3 variants of the MRNA shot and that one was completely fake while bearing the same label. No matter how much they scream about "being hurt more than anyone" it will only be cover to hide the fact they did this to everyone - their "modus operandi" - a load of sh*t.

Rumor: Shots to be recalled

There is a lot floating around about this and nothing solid yet. The prevailing perspective is that the shots are "not working" and will be recalled due to a "labeling error" or whatever. The reality is THEY GOT BUSTED. Too many people have woken up and know exactly what those damn shots are, so the "elite" that tried to destroy everyone with them and only got 60 percent of everyone are trying to shape the narrative in their favor before THIS CHART HAPPENS:

This chart is one I did based on CDC data calculated forward to show when TS is really going to hit TF from these shots. Is it accurate??? Time will tell, but even if the numbers are not that extreme something will definitely happen. This is American deaths, per month, in millions, for the age group 25-34.

http://www.jimstone.is/1/chartfuture.png

So now they are shaping the narrative, bracing for this becase too many of us are still intact and TOTALLY awake. I certainly hope that chart ends up being fiction.

If that chart happens, they are shaping the narrative so they get a slap on the wrist, rather than being lynched. FOLKS, YOU DO NOT FORGIVE LEADERS FOR THIS, YOU KILL THEM. IF THIS SH*T ACTUALLY HAPPENS, IT WILL BE A CATASTROPHE IF THE PEOPLE PERMIT THEM TO LIVE. All the world's leaders, who are predominantly hoax elected J's will cower behind "Experimental" and whatever else AFTER anyone with an ounce of sense said the shots would do this just based on empiricle evidence, THEY KNEW. THEY KNEW WHAT THOSE SHOTS WERE 100 PERCENT, NO ESCAPING THAT and they did it intentionally while throwing out "cover" to provide plausible deniability just in case enough people refused the shots to one day hold them accountable. Those shots were for ONE THING, and ONE THING ONLY:

http://198.46.190.126/images/guidestonecrop.jpg

J media combined with J medical companies combined with J sleeper cells in the government combined with a legal system heavily seeded with J's are exactly what made that shot happen. There is ONE GROUP that needs to be held accountable for this, a group which has a long history of making nations hate them so much they inevitably get hunted until they have to flee. OH, IT IS FICTION UNTIL THAT CHART HAPPENS. They had damn well better hope it does not!!!

when they recall a product, it means they take it back. How then, will they get that vax out of everyone's veins???

A reader wrote and said "We are already over a million dead, Rense has the numbers"

My response: I have said repeatedly we have to have 10 - 20 million dead already if the job stats are legit, a number arrived upon based on a near depression level economy, with far fewer jobs available that still cannot be filled to the tune of at least 10 million. Less jobs, and they still cannot be filled.

My chart was based on probably fraudulent data from the CDC which lowballed it, calculated forward. There's no way we are going to be able to overlook the number of dead by April/May

Now there are rumors that "they" want a nuclear exchange so they can explain where all the vaxxed dead went. That would not surprise me AT ALL. "They" are hopelessly busted in their Corona con job, and they will be perfectly happy to murder their way out of accountability, no matter what it takes, including nukes. That happens to be a big problem and a big reality when society allows itself to be ruled by psychopaths one way or another, in this case via rigged elections that have been going on for 30 years.

Probably rumor: Wal-Mart getting rid of price tags

Additionally, the in-store scanners are rumored to be missing in some locations now.

It all started with one social media post, and now I am seeing more. According to rumor, Wal Mart is getting rid of price tags and you are supposed to use your phone to scan a barcode under the item instead for the price. This is only getting started, most areas still have the prices listed as usual. HOWEVER:
If this ends up being true, it could be because:

1. They expect such runaway inflation that prices will be changing too fast for stock people to keep up with, so a scan with the phone shows the latest electronically updated price and:

2. It could be integrated with social credit score so the price you pay is an individual price, with others paying more or less for the same item. You scan YOUR price and someone else gets a different price.

4 All of this is too early to know what is going on, prices change a lot in Mex and the stores seem to all keep the prices listed. Some of them use digital price tags in the better areas where they won't get stolen, Wal Mart surely could too

This is only a rumor or a "heads up", there might be nothing to it at all.

I would be happy to use self checkout with this system and scan the items at the self checkout and then abandon half the cart if need be RIGHT THERE. They could calculate the mayhem, plug it into whatever formula they have and then decide whether or not price tags are not such a bad idea after all.

This looks like A great way to cover up vax deaths
https://www.daytondailynews.com/local/da...2CVZGECLE/

Yeah, the houses pictured DID look like they were somewhat acceptable to be torn down, but they were the worst 3 examples out of 850. Any random group of 850 not-so-premium homes would have houses like that. And 850 will be torn down in DAYTON ALONE, which is not a big city. That's a significant number of homes for that town.

Mexico just sent out a public service announcement stating the pandemic is over

UPDATE: This has been rescinded because I finally saw those PSA's and they don't qualify.

That said, this was in Montreal. Though a printer is in the background this is confirmed legit, the signs are also in French.

http://198.46.190.126/images/vaxmandate.png


We probably won this battle

But the war is not over. And our losses will continue as those who got the shot continue to die off. Claudia said this morning "It feels like World War 3 is over". It is an accurate statement to call it world war 3, where you got shot with a fluid rather than lead, but I don't think it is over because the people who perpetrated it are still in power, with not even ONE removed ANYWHERE. That's not a good place to be sitting when we know what they did and they STILL have power.
And we cannot vote them out.

Rest assured that any subsequent actions they will definitely take will be well planned to dump all losses squarely on us, while they hide in the corner watching. I have repeatedly said who is doing this to us, why repeat it?

YES, we won the Corona battle with only the worst scammers who have the most to lose holding onto it wherever they are, with the United States and Canada being notable cases. But when Britain announces it is over and Mexico announces it is (soon to be) over and others announce it is over, that's sort of a checkmate.

So what next? Will we get the BIG ONE Gates has repeatedly mentioned? How about that monkey story? That followed the plot precislely like the movie "Outbreak", right down to the species. Are "they" now smearing ATM screens with the big bad new disease we have already been threatened with? With an incubation period of 2 weeks we can't know that. We would not know for a month or two. Then what? And that is precisely why it is completely wrong to leave the people who pulled the first corona scam in positions of power, even if it means taking them out by force. We cannot sit around and wait for them to make the next move, and have it be the same move just because "they would never do that again", if we sit and do nothing they definitely will.

I think they are too chicken to actually push Russia to nuking us. They have their monkey story and we already know they have smallpox where it is not supposed to be . . . . yes they were CDC monkeys on their way to a CDC quarantine facility. Do you trust the CDC??

So that's where we are at - waiting for the next battle in this war because the bastards who launched the first one are still in power, after only WE took losses. That's not a good place to be, no, not at all

Vaxxed with bad smell??

I saw this all over the forums but I figured it might be confirmation bias so I did not mention it. Then, I got this in the mail from a reader who is a native spanish speaker who obviously would not have hit the same forums. I have cleaned up the English version that reader sent, here it is:
What is that smell?

A few months ago, I started smelling it. It was something I have never smelled before, something so different that I don't even know how to describe it. It is an unnatural smell - a smell that stays in the nose and mouth for a day or more after
I figured it must be from a new teflon spray on the belt of a nearby tortilla machine in the town . . . but recently I went to a nearby town using public transport and I smelled that strong smell on the bus, and then only around certain people who are probably vaccinated - I know a girl who works in the internet cafe has already been vaccinated several times because of her talks with other people. The last time I saw her she was sneezing and seemed to have the flu, and she smelled strongly of that odor.

I am pretty sure now the smell is from the artificial proteins produced by the bodies of those who received the real injection, which changes the RNA to produce those spike proteins endlessly until it clogs and kills - Now there has been enough time since they started injecting them here in Mexico for many people to be loaded with spike proteins and who logically are already shedding those proteins.

As in Ecuador where the "vaccination" program began a little earlier and the streets and beaches are now covered with corpses, it must be that there are people here who are approaching the end of their lives with their bodies already completely full of that poison. It is likely that few people talk about it because the smell is so different it is hard to label what it is . . . .

http://198.46.190.126/images/easterneurope.png

BOOOM: IF RUMOR HOLDS, THEY ARE GOING TO BLAME THE VAX DEATHS ON THE MONKEYS

RUMOR: THE WOMAN WHO CAME IN CLOSE CONTACT WITH ONE OF THE MONKEYS IS TRIPLE JABBED AND "SHOWING SYMPTOMS". I KID YOU NOT, YOU CANNOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP!!!!

Update: I traced the story down to what appears to be a local paper near the accident scene but the site is so messed up I consider it low credibility. Looking over it real well it is definitely a local paper but it probably has 3 people on staff and they are all biased.
https://hbg100.com/2022/01/24/witness-at...nt-page-1/

We will have to see how this plays out, but that's the rumor at this point. Dime to a dollar I called it day one: the monkeys are going to be the excuse for the vax damage and they'll probably mandate a new vax for it to double their winnings.

Great report! I regret getting the vaccine
https://www.dailyveracity.com/2022/01/23...han-covid/

Many testimonies of vax damage. Obviously the dead are not posting about it.

Wow, watch Klaus Schwab brag about placing world leaders, including Trudeau!

This is VERY important info right before a war, it proves Klaus is king and they are ALL ON THE SAME TEAM!!! Putin is the enemy too!!!

http://198.46.190.126/videos/klausteam.mp4

Check out where "12 monkeys" was filmed

Just down the road from where the new batch of monkeys got loose!!! Coincidence???

HUGE BLACKOUT IN CENTRAL ASIA

UPDATE: Russia is the backup power source and it is not working.
UPDATE: A probable Stuxnet attack was used to cause electrical explosions in 530,000 volt switch gear, they are down for the count, just like Venezuela.
Three of the 'stans are in a blackout. Looks like the ball is rolling, just look at the next item . . . . whoah.

WHITE PEOPLE ARE RACIST BECAUSE BLACK PEOPLE CAN'T SWIM

I KID YOU NOT, THAT'S THE NEW MSM RACE HATRED LINE, SEE THIS.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/8xbyax/m...ts-history

When black people are thrown in water, they drown at a rate of 10:1 more than whites. Vice admits this is a real phenomenon, and then invents an outrageous story to blame whitie.
Reality: Blacks don't like swimming in public pools because the chlorine wrecks their hair and causes skin problems. Blaming whitie because blacks don't use public pools is like claiming blacks stole all the basketball courts and that's why white people can't jump. It all boils down to the small hats pushing race hatred themes via the media they stole or control, there's no reality to any of it other than that small hats perceive they are strong when they divide others. All of this is learned in Jewish culture and parallel education their victim populations do not get. They are indeed the ultimate social slime balls.

Austria is ending the lockdowns

Well that's good news, but this is only happening because someone has something bigger planned. By the way, only 15 percent of Americans would support a war if Russia went into Ukraine. There has already been one major blackout most likely caused by a Stuxnet type attack on switchgear. And the poisonings have already started . .

Wisconsin voted to recall 2020 elections

A good sheriff there eventually prevailed and prevented them from covering up the fraud. However, I don't think we have Trump anymore, they got to him. I would be skeptical if at this point they backed off and let Trump take it to quell public outrage. Trump just is not Trump anymore.

BOOM: ANOTHER METHOD OF COVERING UP VAX DEATHS

The claim is going to be that you can die from Covid MONTHS after all symptoms disappear and that you never even had to notice symptoms to begin with. HOW CONVENIENT!!!

They specifically state "deaths from all causes" will increase because of "long Covid" and then state a few causes that are known to be vax induced.

http://82.221.129.208/1/longcovid.png

WELL WELL, HERE IS HOW THEY WILL INSTALL HILLARY:

1. Get Supreme Court Justice Breyer to step down.
2. Use the Supreme Court as a trash bin to throw Kamala into
3. Appoint Hillary vice president.
4. Remove Biden for medical reasons.
That's the plan, HERE IT IS. MSM source too. In this case, they won't lie.

http://82.221.129.208/1/hillary4thewin.png

Someone brought graphene back into the spotlight

I won't say who, I will just say this: When the initial claims were that the shot was 99 percent graphene (impossible, that would not go through a syringe, and the stuff that would had to be emulsified, and reduced to about 8 percent,) AND THEN "bubbles in a microscope slide" were presented as "graphene balls", if there IS graphene in the Pfizer shot (and there probably is) by the time all the bullshit was spewed no one of any creedence was paying attention anymore.
The woman that hoaxed the graphene balls had too good of a microscope to not know FULLY what she was doing, it was an intentional scam. I stand by what Rense posted on this topic 100 percent. He could not have nailed it better.

So does graphene get into nerves and make it possible for them to pick up a 5G signal and be controlled by it? Possibly, and it is too bad mister air bubbles said it. NO ONE who is ANYONE in the medical community is going to care. That's pure damage. I am not even a doctor and the stupid air bubbles totally turned me off.

Posting sh*t like that will generate hits. It might even make people avoid the vax. But on a professional level, with the people who matter, it is PURE DESTRUCTION because ALL OF THEM have seen this:

The only difference is when this was hoaxed as graphene it was done on purpose so the bubbles had a uniform size. And what would ANYONE in the medical community do that knew anything at all? They'd laugh at the "internet graphene hoax" and "God, what kind of sh*t will they post tomorrow" and BOOM: VAX MANDATE.

LIE: (not rumor, LIE:) Trudeau is hiding out after being exposed to Covid

REALITY: That un-vaxxed p*cker has consistently been hopped up on a triple dose of Hydroxychloroquine while he enjoys a daily Ivermectin apple punch.

REALITY: HE IS HIDING FROM THE TRUCKERS WHO ARE SMASHING OTTAWA WITH 50,000+ TRUCKS (probably 100,000) AND OVER A MILLION WALKING SUPPORTERS.

He's hiding because he is SCARED. He is NOT ISOLATING DUE TO COVID. WHAT A PR*CK for even suggesting that. What's wrong with "I am scared, so I am going to bug out for a while??" At least if he exhibited even that small level of honesty it might warrant a grain of respect. Instead he hid behind "Covid". HE HAS NO HONOR.
Airplane view of one small part of the convoy in Eastern Saskatchewan, about 1,300 miles away from Ottawa. Trucks are arriving in packs like this from all over Canada:

http://198.46.190.126/videos/convoy.mp4
There was even a cement truck in that group, this has GOT TO BE HUGE.

IT IS MORE THAN CLOTS. Actual images from a coroner, and they are awful. The goods are delivered before 3 minutes in this half hour video.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uWZucDetxS4T/

The chart I posted earlier showing catastrophe in April/May is probably SPOT ON.

If you are prominent and anti vax, and you get vaxxed, they will give you an intentional kill shot and then say you died of covid, HERE IS PROOF
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/other-spo...d-26051796

They just gave him a death jab and then claimed he died of Covid before he had antibodies from the shot. Ridiculous transparent con job murder B.S.

FRENCH COURT RULES DEATH BY VAX IS SUICIDE IN LIFE INSURANCE CLAIMS

UPDATE: Judgedredd wrote and said it was an Italian court, not a French court, but with that considered everything checked out accurate. My response: The French make Renault. The Italians make Ferrari . . . .
You can't make this stuff up, AND THAT COURT IS RIGHT. Since the vax is experimental, taking it is suicidal and insurance companies don't have to cover that. I found this here.

"Picked this story up at La Quinta Columna TV's Telegram account, popped it into Google Translate (maybe the censors will learn something), et voila - - a qui esta: A Spanish newspaper, Noticiero Universal, reports that a French court has agreed with an insurance company that death after experimental vaccination is "suicide."
Is it possible? Seems too rational to be true, but here's the headline: "La justicia francesa exime a una compania de seguros de cubrir la muerte de un vacunado por considerar un suicidio que se inyectara un producto experimental"
Google translate is a bit clunky, but the gist is clear:
French justice exempts an insurance company from covering the death of a vaccinated person for considering suicide who injected an experimental product.
Follow the money, but in this case it leads not to a corrupt den of killers 'n' cash but to a ruling of bottom-line-logic. Taking an experimental shot of gene-altering nano-wiring is, yes, suicidal.
Here's the rest of the translation.
A French citizen dies two weeks after receiving the vaccines, but the life insurance does not cover his death, arguing that he volunteered to inject himself with an experimental product that had not been properly tested.
The court in charge of the case has accepted the objections of the insurer considering, "in law, that adherence to the experiment of phase three, in which the proven innocuousness is non-existent", makes the death of the French citizen to be considered a "fatality". "voluntary", that is, risk not covered by the contract and legally admitted as suicide.
The family appealed this decision, but the insurer's defense was admitted as "founded and contractually fair", considering that "this known and public taking of mortal risk is legally like suicide", since the client had sufficient information and , however, "has voluntarily accepted to run the risk of dying without being forced to do so."
Consequently, death after vaccination is considered suicide by the French courts, which sets a disturbing precedent. For their part, the insurers will not repay the loans either because the lethal risk of the vaccine makes the contract null and void.
"This judicial decision came after the filing of a lawsuit (Recourse to Law 210/92) to obtain compensation, damages and interest after a death by vaccination, confirmed by autopsy. The request was not accepted because vaccination is not mandatory", explains a source familiar with the case.
"Hence the race to impose the health pass on us, because the governments have signed leonine secret contracts with the laboratories, in which they have demanded that they not be held responsible in the event of adverse effects. These governments have therefore blackmailed the populations to avoid being responsible themselves", he adds.
Of course, a few details more would be helpful -- the insurance company, the court, stuff like that. If/when they show up, I'll update."
My comment: My guess is that American insurance companies are doing the same thing, but it is so completely censored no one has been able to get the word out.

I gotta admit, the undertaker video from yesterday has me worried

Worried that this chart I did is right. To be clear, in case people missed the point of this chart this chart is based on CDC data showing an upward trend in overall non-covid related deaths for the age group 25 - 34. The upward trend corresponds with the introduction of the vax. The upward trend became so obvious in the data that they stopped releasing it. The chart is based on a calculated progression for what that data would do if allowed to continue on the same path as the data from 6 months before July, when the vaxxes were released. It shows what the CDC is refusing to allow the public to know. It shows when we go into the hockey stick.
Six months of data is enough to get an idea where things will go, but it was not enough to nail the date with precision. What is in this chart is simply what the math did with limited input, the math said catastrophe before the end of april but I put in a gray zone for possibly as long as September because the initial sample was not enough to pin "when" down exactly, despite it being good enough to clearly state it "will" happen. HERE IS WHERE WE ARE GOING FOR AGE GROUP 24-35, READ IT AND WEEP. This is the same chart I have posted before, it is too important to post only once.

This is when the MRNA vax deaths will skyrocket.

http://www.jimstone.is/1/chartfuture.png


Here is what embalmers are pulling out of the vaxxed. This crap is stuck in the veins of the vaxxed and prevents the embalming fluid from going in, so they have to get it out to do their work. This is what is going to make the chart above come true, people can't survive having this happen.

http://82.221.129.208/1/embalmclot.jpg


People in the medical community who are pushing the shots need to look at this and decide where their morals are. The video this was taken from is HERE and this is shown before the three minute mark so you won't have to wait long to see it. There are other similar images presented throughout the video.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uWZucDetxS4T/

TO THOSE IN THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY WHO ARE TOO STUPID TO REALIZE THERE REALLY COULD BE A CONSPIRACY: There is a monument in Georgia that was placed by the "elite" from the World Economic Forum that spells out the killing of 7.5 billion people in 12 languages. The guidestones are what that DNA "vax" is for. They are not even keeping it a secret.

http://198.46.190.126/images/guidestonecrop.jpg

WAKE THE HELL UP. This is so well known by "nutcases" it has been presented like this on this site for 10 years:

http://82.221.129.208/1/guidestonegroup1.jpg

To the idiots in the medical community: Look at that "clot". Are we still nutcases???

Obviously we are, because the "fact check" you'll no doubt look for, a fact check approved by the "guidestone group" will say so!!!

http://82.221.129.208/1/lightfoot.jpg


Ummmm, NO.

http://82.221.129.208/1/embalmclothi.jpg

This is the type of thing you see when enemies run the state.

Biden is showing up right by this bridge to "talk infrastructure" today. How convenient!!!

http://82.221.129.208/1/bridgeblowout.png


http://82.221.129.208/1/convoyrussia.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpR8H-J2AGE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXohRZHrRXo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlGAEfqnhKM

https://www.orwell.city/2021/11/MAC.html

Quote:Dr. Luis De Benito shares an advance of his report on the MAC address phenomenon in inoculated individuals
HOME ARCHIVE SPECIAL PROGRAM FINAL REPORT BY DR. CAMPRA ANTIOXIDANTS DETOX VERSIÓN EN ESPAÑOL DONATE
Dr. Luis De Benito shares an advance of his report on the MAC address phenomenon in inoculated individuals
NOVEMBER 24, 2021

Dr. Luis Miguel De Benito, a digestive physician with a Ph.D. in molecular biology, presents an excerpt of the research on the mysterious MAC addresses detected in vaccinated individuals with Bluetooth apps.

It's a brief report that he has sent to different research teams worldwide and will be released in its entirety on the 31st of this month.

In this short preview, Dr. De Benito explains what he has observed and what could be the possible causes of this phenomenon.

Orwell City brings the summary of his presentation below.

Dr. Luis De Benito: I'm going to tell you today the findings of this summer, which go along the lines of what may be behind all this attempt to vaccinate.

Why so much interest in jabbing? What's the reason? I'm going to tell you.

The international organizations that are also investigating this matter asked me for a brief report on what I had done during the summer. And I'm going to read it to you as it is. I'm going to make glosses of what I'm saying. But this is what I've written to them. And the different teams that are investigating this are seeing what part of it is right and what part is not. They're translating it into several languages. I say this because, probably, by the 31st it's going to be made public in other places or whatever.

It's been hard for me to get here to read it. Do you know why? Because it does weigh a little bit the fact of taking out of the medical issue. All this, you know, started as a channel to discuss the evolution of the pandemic, the affected, the treatments, the virus, how the ICUs were. Well, and this no longer makes sense. All that's part of the past. And now, what we're going to is a recognition of a desire, on the part of the authorities, to take away freedoms from human beings.

I don't care if you think I'm raving or not. But as I have a moral obligation to report what I have done, I tell you today. And whoever wants to believe it will believe it, and whoever doesn't will judge, criticize and compare it. As I say, I've written it, and I have already sent it to the teams that are studying this subject in different parts of the world.

If from the medical point of view there's no need to administer any preventive measure for a disease with the lethality of 2 per thousand, why so much insistence that everyone should be inoculated? What's the vaccine going to give me that I don't already have? Well, this experiment arose from this reflection.

Although there are many consultations, during the summer of 2021, in the afternoons, I was the only operative. There wasn't even administrative staff in the afternoons in that building. Under my office, I occasionally parked an ambulance from SUMA, from the emergency service, because they have a base there. Those were the only "interferences" I detected. Most of the observations were carried out without that artifact. I started the consultation at 15:00 and had patients listed every 20 minutes.

Due to COVID measures, it was recommended that they come alone and, if possible, at the appointed time. Not before or after. Before starting the consultation, I'd connect the Bluetooth application on my cell phone and invariably check that there was no device available to contact. There was no electronic device in range to connect to. When a patient appeared, often already up the stairs or at the beginning of the corridor, about 20 meters away from the practice, on my cell phone, I could see if one or two devices to connect to with Bluetooth appeared. One or two or none.

On my phone, I could check to see if the Bluetooth was detecting something or nothing. And if it was something, it was a device with a MAC Address (Media Access Control) code. This is a unique identifier that electronic device manufacturers assign to a card or item that can be networked.

After attending to the patient's medical requirements, I'd ask him whether or not he had been vaccinated for COVID. If the answer was affirmative, it was usually quick and without hesitation. And if it was negative, it was often accompanied by a certain wariness, if not anger at the question. A reaction that explained to me that, in general, those who hadn't wanted to be vaccinated had been subjected to some kind of adverse social situation. After reassuring the patient, whatever his response, I'd write down on a sheet of paper the answer he gave me.

None of the 137 patients I asked refused to answer. If the answer was affirmative, I'd ask them what type of vaccine they had received, when, and if they had had any adverse reactions. I'd then ask them if they had any cell phones or electronic devices such as wireless headsets or tablets on them, and if so, I'd ask them to turn it off for a moment. When they turned it off, on my cell phone, usually, one of the devices that registered to Bluetooth would disappear.

Out of hundreds... Here are the results.

Of the 137 patients questioned, 112 said they had been vaccinated, and 25 said they hadn't been vaccinated. None of the patients who said they hadn't been vaccinated registered on my cell phone any device available for Bluetooth connection, having ensured the disconnection of their cell phone, if they had one. In 96 patients of the 112 who said they had been vaccinated, 96 of the 112 having switched off their electronic devices if they were carrying them, a MAC code remained on the screen of my cell phone, which I had already noted in my notes next to the patient's medical history.

I interpreted that it was a code that the patient himself was carrying and that, in fact, when he left the office, leaving the building, it disappeared from my cell phone. With this simple observation throughout July and August, I've been able to verify that 100% of the patients who say they aren't vaccinated don't raise any contact device with my cell phone via Bluetooth. But 86% of those who said they were vaccinated generated a MAC address on my cell phone. These are the observations made, and many doubts and questions arise from them.

Among them, the ones that seem to me be the most significant are: First, does the signal detected on my cell phone come from the vaccinated person? Well, precisely the isolated environment and not being interfered with by other signals has meant that there's no other source of contamination. In fact, when the SUMA ambulance arrived, apart from other devices such as "SUMA base" and several MAC addresses that I attributed to ambulance personnel who could be vaccinated, I noticed that these signals disappeared when the ambulance left. And when there were suspicions about whether there was some other distorting element, for example, patient escorts in the corridor, accidental operators in the corridor that could be the source or origin of other markers, then I dismissed that case. It's not within the 137 that I have confirmed.

Second, do all cell phones detect Bluetooth devices with equal capability? My answer is no. My experience is that they don't.

Third, does the detectable MAC Address on a person allow interaction with him? To what extent? At least I'm sure of one thing: it allows me to know where he is because I knew that someone vaccinated was coming to my office before he showed up.

The fourth question I asked myself: If the MAC Address is something personal, individual, and unrepeatable, how is it possible that the five people who were injected with the contents of the same vial, from the same distribution of the same batch, don't have 5 different MAC addresses? Well, I consulted with some computer technicians, roboticists and fellow biologists and engineers, experts in computer science, and nanorobotics. And they advocate the possibility that this code is generated as a result of the interaction of what's injected with the genetic material of the patient. Perhaps not so much with their DNA as with the larger compatibility complex, the HLAs, which are ultimately derived from the genome.

If the MAC address is generated by the vaccine, why do only 86% of those who claim to be vaccinated have it? Different answers have been considered to answer this question.

The first one: some of the vials could be placebo.

Second: some vials could be denatured.

Third: a lack of response. In other words, the expected results are not always obtained when a product is applied.

And the fourth, which seems very important to me, is because the patient lies and says he is vaccinated when he isn't to avoid problems or controversies.

I have many doubts. These are the findings that I've made. They're outside my medical knowledge. I simply attest that when you're in consultation with a person in an isolated environment, that comes up on my cell phone. What does it mean? I have no idea. But I don't like it.

Quote:A well defined and carried out study proves the vax is installing bluetooth
I have not hit the bluetooth topic hard because all of the studies done so far were not
done in a way that could truly pin down what was going on in a scientifically credible
way. But for me, today that changed. I finally stumbled across work by Dr. Luis De
Benito that was released a month and a half ago that proves it is indeed happening, and
the proof was arrived upon in a way that was properly done.

There is no question the elite are using the vax to put the mark of the beast into people. We are there, at that
phase in the timeline that is in the bible. Dr. Benito never mentions this, he just says people are identifiable
from 20 meters away, but we all know what that means. Usually on this site I try to get all the facts out,
everything relevant, with a short read by editing stuff down to the basics and only writing what needs to
be said. I am not going to do that this time, the doctor's entire statement will be posted IN FULL, don't worry about the long read because despite the intro, the read is worth it.

Read this, ALL OF IT, to the end. There's no way out of it, the shot is not a vax, it is an
attempt to get everyone wired into "the internet of things".

Dr. Luis Benito: The vaxxed are definitely transmitting
A video of Dr. Luis giving this testimony is HERE and you know this one is not a psy op because he's not some sort of kook.
Dr. Luis Benito explains what he has observed and what could be the possible causes of the phenomenon of the "MACcinated" individuals.
https://rumble.com/vppv0h-dr.-luis-de-be...enon-.html

My comment: Let's do a little math: 41 out of 137 people did not generate a mac address. that's 29.992 or 30
percent of the population in his area DID NOT GET A SHOT, including those who lied about it. Though that
number is a bit low compared to the 40 percent non vaxxed figure I have posted repeatedly, Doc is in a city
where vaxxed rates are likely to be higher and that much of a swing fits. Yes, some of the people likely lied
about being vaxxed and it is probable that virtually ALL the vaxxed are generating bluetooth, with the few that
are not equaling a malfunction in their device.

Toxic vaccine batch numbers - howbad.info

https://howbad.info/
https://howbad.info/incremental.pdf
https://howbad.info/deathbylottery.pdf
https://howbad.info/moderna20A21A.pdf
https://howbad.info/modernatoxicity.pdf
https://howbad.info/pfizertoxicity.pdf
https://hillmd.substack.com/p/vaccine-ba...n-toxicity
https://needtoknow.news/2021/12/scientis...tch-app-2/
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/breakin...rculation/
https://rielpolitik.com/2021/11/13/cover...ment-data/
https://rielpolitik.com/2021/12/23/cover...e-whitney/
https://truth11.com/2022/01/14/pfizer-fd...-genocide/
https://truth11.com/2022/01/14/video-rei...d-to-kill/
https://rielpolitik.com/2022/01/25/cover...f-vaccine/

Quote:https://www.bitchute.com/embed/g62gcjrOuOyu
The most toxic Covid vax batch numbers end in 20A or 21A
This does not mean the others are OK, it just means that those two are the ones that make people complain. But
based on Britain's stats, they are ALL bad. Just some are (a lot) worse than others, to such an extent they look like
they are probably outright weapons given to "the right people".
Since there are now known to be 3 different vax variants ­ one for politicians and "elite", one for general nobodies,
and one for "bad people", it is probably safe to assume that you can delete 2/3 of the vaxxes from the column he
shows and conclude that your personal chance of getting a bad one are much much higher than it looks on screen.
The killer batches are probably produced in higher numbers than the rest of the batches

Quote:UK Scientist Reveals Bombshell Data Analysis: Tracks Batches Of Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen, Finds “..Some Batches Are 50 Times Worse Than Others”

I was told about the work of Craig Paardekooper by my friend of many years, PhD bio-chemist Dr. Dave Rasnick a few days ago; Today came this email from Dave, clarifying his shocking findings:

“ I’m following the very important work of Craig Paardekooper at Kingston University London. Recently, I introduced Craig’s work to our email group.

Three of his conclusions:

The companies purposely manufactured non-uniform formulations of their vaccines while representing to the public that all COVID-19 vaccines from a given manufacturer were uniform in their formulation.
Over 20,000 different batches (lots) of Pfizer, Moderna, J & J injections total.
1 in 200 lots contain deadly ingredients. He urged me to watch a series of videos, in which he lays out the unthinkable. One video here:
Another, “Death By Alphabet: Moderna Batch Codes And Associated Deaths:” here

“Please share with those you know, and also with doctors, nurses and teachers – who may soon be pushing the vax onto children. Doctors and nurses need to see that some batches are 50 x worse than others – before they prescribe them.”

Quote:How Bad is My Batch Are some batches more toxic than others?

Batch codes and associated deaths, disabilities and illnesses for Covid 19 Vaccines


home | Booster Warnings by Month | Moderna | Pfizer | Janssen | Moderna (outside USA) | Pfizer (outside USA) | Janssen (outside USA) | Severe | Lethal | Size Matters | Time till onset | Causality | All or Nothing | Clusters | Lot Sizes | Lot Expiry Dates | Data Cleaning | Symptom | Paralysis | Children | Gender | States | Geography | Japan | Sweden | Case Reports | Whistle Blowers | Video Library | Treatment | Background | Download Source Code | Donate


This site may slow down due to high traffic. A backup site has been created - HowBadisMyBatch.com to reduce overload Thankyou.


!! NEW : A Study of Paralysis Following C19 Vaccination. See Paralysis

!! NEW : C19 Vax vs Flu Vax. See C19 v Flu

!! NEW : Size matters - how injuries increase in direct proportion to numbers vaccinated - a causal link. See Size Matters

!! NEW : Vaccine injury / death differs by state. See States

!! NEW : Lot expiry list reveals which lots are biologically active vs placebo. See Lot Expiry Dates page.

!! NEW : Gender differences in response to vaccine. See Gender

!! NEW : Revelations from Sweden See Sweden

!! NEW : Documents submitted "People vs MHRA" See Prosecution docs

!! NEW : Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA technology, talks about his vaccine injury.





Some batches/lots are associated with excessive deaths, disabilities and adverse reactions. This variation could be due to -

variation in the amount, meaning the number of doses distributed for a particular lot, OR
variation in the toxicity of the doses
Both factors may play a part. Until we know for certain, it is best to be cautious.

You can use this website to find out the number of deaths, disabilities and illnesses associated with your particular batch code. The sheer number of deaths and disabilities is cause for concern - far exceeding the adverse events associated with flu vaccine lots of equal size.


Check out your batch code (lot number)

Moderna Batch Codes

Pfizer Batch Codes

Janssen Batch Codes

Moderna (outside of USA)

Pfizer (outside of USA)

Janssen (outside of USA)

Latest Info on Boosters

Bad Batches of the Month

Variation in Toxicity

Interview with Craig Paardekooper on C-VAR

C19 Vax vs Flu Vax

% Severity varies between Moderna Lots

% Severity varies between Pfizer Lots

Cumulative Toxicity over Time PDF

VIDEO : Variation in Toxicity between Batches

Death by Lottery PDF

VIDEO : Non-GMP Compliant Batches Associated with Death and Disability

VIDEO : Team Enigma - Covid Vax Variability

VIDEO : VAERS reveals super-toxic batches

Do the Batch Codes Code for Toxicity?

Moderna's 20A-21A Classification of Toxicity for Covid Vaccines PDF

Moderna : Alphabetic Labelling of Different Toxicities PDF

Pfizer : Alphabetic Labelling of Different Toxicities PDF

VIDEO : Do Pfizer Batch Numbers Code for Toxicity Part 1 ?

VIDEO : Do Pfizer Batch Numbers Code for Toxicity Part 2 ?

VIDEO : Do Moderna Batch Numbers Code for Toxicity ?


VAERS Database

Covid Science Library

Medical doctors talking about VAERS

VaersAnalysis.info

Data Source

USA Data : All data is sourced from VAERS, a public database of over 700,000 adverse reaction reports for Moderna, Pfizer and Janssen Covid 19 vaccines in the USA.

Foreign Data : VAERS database now also includes data for Moderna, Pfizer and Janssen Covid 19 vaccines in countries outside of the USA. This data can be found here - Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) - the last table listed. This non-domestic data has been submitted by foreign regulatory agencies and consists of approximately 1,000,000 adverse reaction reports.

Our intention is to present the VAERS data in an accessible and unadulterated form, that can be easily verified using the links below

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

Video Tutorial 1 : Extracting Bad Batch Data from VAERS - Deaths, Disabilities, Hospitalisations

Extracting non-domestic data from VAERS - the steps I took

Quote:On page 3 is a table showing
• Column 1 : Moderna batch numbers
• Column 2 : Number of adverse reaction reports for each batch
Column 2 is ordered largest first
1. Notice that all the most toxic Moderna batches end with the letters 20A. These batches have a toxicity from
1780 – 5000 x the mean
2. Below the 1780x toxicity level, there is an ABRUPT change in Moderna batch codes – they end with 21A
instead.
What this looks like
It looks as if the most toxic batches all received a specific code within their batch numbers – all of the Moderna
batches above the orange line are in excess of 1780 x toxicity, and their batch numbers end in the letters 20A.
29 different batches were deployed within this range of toxicity by Moderna.
The majority of toxic batches below this line – in the toxicity range 100-1700x have batch numbers ending in the
letters 21A

Observations
THE BATCHES RANKED MOST TOXIC FROM 1 TO 29
28 out of the 29 most toxic Moderna batches end in 20A
The exception ends in 20-2A which just happens to be very similar to 20A
These batches all have a toxicity in the range 1780 - 4985 x
THE BATCHES RANKED MOST TOXIC FROM 30 TO 59
23 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 21A
7 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 20A
These batches have a range of toxicity of 1237 - 1767 x
THE BATCHES RANKED MOST TOXIC FROM 60 TO 89
25 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 21A
4 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 20A
1 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches ends in 21B
These batches have a toxicity range of 894 - 1215 x
THE BATCHES RANKED MOST TOXIC FROM 90 TO 119
28 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 21A
1 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches ends in 20A
1 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches ends in 20 -2A
These batches have a toxicity range of 568 to 889
THE BATCHES RANKED MOST TOXIC FROM 120 TO 149
27 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 21A
2 end in 20-2A
1 ends in 93902
These batches have a toxicity range of 321-566 x
THE BATCHES RANKED MOST TOXIC FROM 150-179
20 out of 30 of these Moderna Batches end in 21A
1 batch ends in 21-2A
1 batch ends in 93906
1 batch ends in 93901
3 batches are unknown
These batches have a toxicity in the range 121-297x

Quote:Many are wondering why some geographic areas, such as those surrounding Silicon Valley are not seeing nearly as many adverse reactions to the vaxx as other areas, with Prudential reporting a 87% increase in death benefits paid out in the third quarter of 2021, compared the third quarter of 2020. Pacific Life and Annuity is reporting that claims are up by over 80% and other insurers reporting increases of between 12% and 40%.

According to Dr Jane Ruby, we the people of Planet Earth are being subjected to mass unethical drug testing, without informed consent, against all ethical and regulatory rules; tests that are supposed to be reserved for rats and mice.

ATTACK ON AMERICA: COMPANIES INTENTIONALLY DEPLOYING TOXIC BATCHES

Dr Ruby joins Stew Peters to relay how she spent 3 hours with researchers who have been painstakingly identifying the lot numbers of the most deadly vials that are now in circulation.

She says that hackers were able to break into the systems of Pfizer and Moderna and the researchers were able to put together a comprehensive list of all the lots and the code numbers of the most toxic batches.

According to the hackers, 5% of the batches have generated the 21,000 deaths reported to VAERS.

She says that in the Moderna analysis, the death rate in the United States was 10 times higher than in the EU and that the EU had ten times more disabilities, as compared with the US. She says that it is clear that this was by design.

She says they’re not testing doses within the therapeutic range, they’re testing lethal doses. She says she will be coming back with a more in-depth report but says, “Before you let your child get in line for these bioweapon shots, if you don’t believe anything we’ve said, at least ask them for the lot numbers.” The lot numbers can then be checked on the researchers’ website, HowBad.Info.

Dr Ruby says, “What they’re telling us is that this is a worldwide human experiment, it’s intentional and there’s a subplot to this; that there is an attack on the American People.

“What they basically told me is that all three companies, Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson – which is essentially Janssen – are testing. They’re actively testing and it’s worse than we thought, because there’s evidence that these companies are intentionally deploying toxic batches.

“They’ve also identified what they call ‘super toxic’ batches and they’ve released these lot numbers. And I felt like this was an emergency to get this to the American People and the people of the world.

“I want to show you what they found, in terms of most dangerous lots. And when we’re done with this segment, I urge everyone to go to HowBad.Info, where you can check the lots and you can know which lots are deadly and dangerous if you’re thinking or on the fence about getting any of these bioweapon injections.

“When you look at the first column here, for Pfizer, I want you to know that the most deadly, dangerous lot [for children] will begin with ‘EW’. Second to that is ‘FA’ and then ‘FC’…

“The most harmful lot for children, under this EW, FA, FC…the whole lot number is: EW0182 but you can go to HowBad.Info and look up the company and put your lot number in.

“Under Pfizer for adults, the most toxic, deadly batches begin with ‘EN’ and then, second to that is ‘ER’…

“Under Moderna [all ages]…their toxic, deadly batches end in ’20A’.

“Their ‘supertoxic’, under Moderna, have in the middle section – they got very clever…all companies coded their lot numbers so that they would know where the most toxic batches are and I’m going to share with you why that’s important in a little bit.

“But Moderna took it a step further, with a little cleverness, because they embedded their code for their most toxic amount, either in dose or chemical composition under the letters in the middle of that lot number, J, K, L, M.

“The analysts were a team that included the well-known [former Pfizer VP] Dr Michael Yeadon, Craig Partikooper from Africa, a woman named Alexandra Ladipova, who’s in California, our well-known Jessica Rose, who we’ve interviewed on the Stew Peters Show before and another analyst named Walter Wagner.

“Look, this ‘EW’ lot for children – anything that starts with ‘EW’ is responsible for almost all adverse events in children, all ER visits, all hospitalizations, all life-threatening events, disabilities and all deaths.

“This is serious. And here’s the kicker, Stew: All of these deadly lots that we’re going to show you are all already in circulation, remembering that there could be up to 1.5 million doses per lot. This quantification is set by each company. And the way they know that is because they have looked at the companies and they’ve gotten into their systems to see how the companies have laid this out.

“They made the assertion, Stew – and this was shocking – that what these companies are doing is they’re exporting ‘disability’, as defined by the VAERS system, itself out to Europe; ex-USA. And what they’re doing is they’re exporting, if you will, death. More death, more lethal doses in the United States.

LETHAL DOSE STUDIES WITHOUT INFORMED CONSENT

“Now, let me share with everyone – there’s another chart with a scatter plot, it’s called ‘Pfizer Batches’. And when Pfizer batches were arranged alphanumerically along the X axis, the following patterns emerged. And you can see these dots, these vertical dots represent batch numbers.

“And again, there’s that ‘EW’, you can see the green stack of dots. Those are children’s doses. Even though the company claims that the amount is less than the adult dose, supposedly, we have no idea what’s in there…

“They are conducting what we call ‘lethal dose studies’. Now, in pharmaceutical drug development, lethal dose studies look at how much you need to cause death and obviously, they’re not done in humans, in people. They’re always done in animals, though they’ve slowed down in recent years, because people have become concerned. Even though they’re rats and mice; they’re ‘lower forms’, people are concerned about the cruelty to animals. But they’re never done in people.

“And what’s happening here is they are basically, from the analysis, these analysts tell us that these three companies are actively, right now conducting lethal dose studies.

“Let me explain ‘lethal dose’. They take the highest amount of chemical, in terms of dosage and chemical and what they do is that they determine what lethal amount to test half the population.

It’s one of the means to assess acute toxicity prior to going into human studies. And like I aid, it has been largely phased-out. They are conducting it without informed consent, it’s against all ethical and regulatory rules. In other words, we believe these companies are just proceeding with impunity, because there is nothing stopping them.

SIGNIFICANCE OF NUMBERS IN BATCH CODES

“I want to also show people something – before we get into a larger look at the lots and what’s happening and how these analysts are so sure that this is not by randomization, that this is not by chance, I want to take a look at the parts of a Moderna batch code.

“I mentioned earlier that Moderna got a little ore complex and clever. Remember, these companies, we now know are actually embedding into their lots a code to tell THEM which lots are toxic, which ones are causing disabilities and what types of disabilities! This is absolutely outrageous!

“When you look at the parts of a Moderna batch code, you see ‘011’, the letter ‘L’, and ’20A’.

“’20A’, as we mentioned before, in the first chart I showed…denotes the most lethal batch of lot codes in the Moderna program right now. And remember, all of these numbers I’m going to show you are from the middle of November, all the way up until s late as December 16, just a couple of weeks ago.

“So when you look at this number, 011-L-20A, what you’re looking at in the ‘011’ is the temporal batch order; so how it’s being developed over time and deployed by the company.

“The ‘L’ is the concentration. It tells he company the toxicity and number of adverse reactions.

“And then, the ’20A’ is qualitative; it’s the ingredient. And either ’20A’, which was the most toxic of their batch lots or ’21A’ came up, as well.

“So this is their clever scheme…The reason they’re not concerned with safety issues is because this is an a priori design. This is designed ahead of time to send out toxic batches and then, to gather their information.”

PROFESSIONAL HACKERS GOT INTO PFIZER & MODERNA

Dr Ruby explains that professional hackers got into Pfizer and Moderna’s systems and they were able to verify the whole lots. Dr Partikooper has a list of all the Moderna batches deployed so far. And Moderna also has a web tool for checking the expiration dates for the batches and these computer guys hacked into the Moderna and Pfizer websites and got entire lists of all their batches and batch code numbers.

She says, “I just want to make something very clear: This exporting death to the USA and disability to the EU, what they found, for example, in the Moderna analysis. There was ten times the death rate in the United States than in the EU and in the Moderna group, there were ten times more disabilities in the EU group compared with the USA.”

Dr Ruby says they’re clearly not testing doses within the therapeutic range, they’re testing lethal doses. She says she will be coming back with a more in-depth report and says, “Before you let your child get in line for these bioweapon shots, if you don’t believe anything we’ve said, at least ask them for the lot numbers.”

-

In the pharmaceutical world of economic durable competitive advantages, having a patent on a best-selling drug is about as good as it gets. The next best thing is having a monopoly on selling a country’s national health program the vaccines it needs for its childhood inoculation programs.Both of these businesses are hugely profitable and GSK excels in both these categories.
The vaccine business is particularly attractive because an individual shot (or jab) costs GSK approximately 1.50 USD to manufacture and it sells to national vaccine programs for approximately 9USD a shot. That gives GSK a net profit of approximately 7.50 USD a shot. This markup gives GSK a very healthy profit margin that improves with and every new disease that the company develops a vaccine for. Consider this: GSK’s profits rose 10% with the 2009 Swine Flu outbreak – a disease for which the company had a state-of-the-art vaccine ready to inoculate the masses.
In addition to its patents and the durable competitive advantage GSK has with the vaccines, it also established the relationship with the world’s governments, and it has the financial capital to create, manufacture and sell vaccines on a world scale. If you were in charge of the health of a nation’s 30 million-plus children, who would you buy your vaccines from? Every year? Year after year? You’d pick the biggest and the best. There are only four pharmaceutical giants that control most of the vaccine production in the world and GSK is one of them.
There is another component to the vaccine equation that also spells BIG MONEY: Every year, women all over the world give birth to approximately 133 million new babies, 4.3 million in the US alone. With the United States Centers for Disease Control recommending that children aged birth through six receive thirty four individual vaccine shots/jabs, that means the market for those thirty-four vaccine shots/jabs increases every year by 4.3 million in just the US alone. This in turn means that the vaccine manufacturers selling in the U.S. have the potential to earn a profit of 1.09 billion USD every year. (4.3 million x 34 x 7.50USD = 1.09 billion). Consider the number of yearly vaccines worldwide and the numbers are staggering – approximately 34 billion a year (133 million x 34 x 7.5 = 33.9 billion USD). After ten years, in the U.S. alone vaccine manufacturers will see more than 10 billion USD in net profit. On a world scale, the number jumps to a potential 340 billion USD in profits.
And wait, it gets even better. With the invention of each new vaccine comes a patent that is good for twenty years and guarantees that no one else can make the vaccine. In other words, the company has a monopoly.
And wait, it gets even better. With the invention of each new vaccine comes a patent that is good for twenty years and guarantees that no one else can make the vaccine. In other words, the company has a monopoly.
And last but not least, vaccine manufacturers in the U.S. are completely immune from lawsuits. Back in the 1980s several bad batches of vaccines injured so many children that the resulting successful lawsuits threatened to bankrupt the manufacturers, so the manufacturers lobbied a bill through Congress making them a protected class.

Quote:Death by Lottery - 5% of V Batches are Highly Toxic
a summary by Craig Paardekooper
Definition
The toxicity of a batch is defined by the number of deaths and adverse reactions associated with it’s
batch number, as recorded in the VAERS system.
Some time back in April I posted this idea
- https://web.facebook.com/groups/352273635911627/search/...
namely that -
"When an adverse reaction occurs too frequently for it to be chance, then people begin to see a
significant connection. So the government strategy is to keep the perceived occurrence below the level
of significance. With thousands becoming seriously ill after the V in plain sight of their relatives, the
only way to lower the perceived frequency is to make out that they are the only ones – that they are
the unfortunate few.
The same strategy was used during the war. The Allies had decoded ENIGMA and knew the location
and movements of all the U-boats. But they could not attack all of them, because then the Germans
would know that Enigma had been cracked. Instead they had to keep the frequency of attack below
the level of significance – often leaving a U-boat alone, even when that U boat would subsequently
attack an allied ship.
In the same way, the perceived frequency of adverse reactions to the V must be kept low, so that the
public remain barely aware that each attack of illness is by design.
Such a strategy could be implemented by varying batches, so only 7% receive a toxic V during each V
round – the remainder receiving a placebo. 7 % is very close to the 5% significance level. If 2 V rounds
occur each year, then after 7 years the mortality will be 7 x 2 x 7 = 98% - almost total depopulation."
Now, as it turns out, an in depth analysis of frequency of adverse reactions as they relate to different
batches of the V has been carried out. And they have found that 5% of the batches are extremely toxic,
whilst the remaining 95% are only mildly toxic.
For Pf-izer
96% of lots produced 0 deaths;
4% of lots accounted for all the deaths.
For Mode-rna
95% of lots produced 0 deaths
5% of lots accounted for all the deaths
It is found that the frequency of adverse reactions for all the batches cluster into two distinct groups – two
completely distinct distributions – whereby one group has an average that is 500 times greater than the
other group, and the extremes of the distribution do not overlap.
It has also been found that the number of adverse reactions per lot for the Pfizer and Moderna Vs has a
100 fold greater range than the number of adverse reactions per lot for the flu vax
Flu V
Range of Number of adverse reactions per lot 1-26
Pf-izer V
Range of Number of adverse reactions per lot 1-3563
Mode-rna V
Range of Number of adverse reactions per lot 1-4967
Furthermore, it has been found that the highly toxic batches were distributed to all states/regions of a
country, whereas the low-toxic batches are generally distributed to just one or two regions - the
differences in distribution are strongly significant.
2.9% of Pf-izer lots distributed to more than 12 states
and account for 96.5% of all the deaths
and account for 95.5% of all hospitalisations
and account for 94.7% of all adverse event reports
97.1% of Pf-izer lots were distributed to less than 12 states
and account for 3.5% of all the deaths
and account for 4.5% of all hospitalisations
and account for 5.3% of all adverse event reports
Summary
These data support the contention that batches /lots of two different toxicities are being rolled out. 5% of
the batches / lots are highly toxic and account for 95% of all fatalities and injuries. These batches are being
widely distributed to more than l2 regions of a country.
Conversely, 95% of the batches are of a lower toxicity, and account for only 5% of fatalities and injuries.
Each of these batches is distributed to less than 12 regions of a country – typically 1 or 2 states.
Conclusion
Deaths are frequently attributed to old age or co-morbidities, rather than to the V. If this were the case
then there should be no significant difference in adverse effects between batches - since the V should have
no effect on the adverse reaction frequency.
However, in reality what we find is that adverse reactions are strongly determined by particular batches.
What is more, these highly toxic batches appear to have been deliberately distributed to a far wider
population.
Reference
The investigation can be viewed here
https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/31/100-perc...EVvToW4PX4

Quote:Vaccine batches vary systematically in toxicity and are distributed to unsuspecting Americans by three companies: researcher
One company allegedly performed toxic dose range finding without consent (Updated 1/9/22)

James Hill, MD, JD
Dec 6, 2021
38
69

Researcher Craig Paardekooper (Kingston University, London) claims US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data show vaccine batches are sequentially marked by varying toxicity.

Read here about his batch lookup site, howbad.info.

Paardekooper claims:

VAERS shows about 1 in 200 vaccine batches (~ 0.5%) are “highly toxic,” having a high number (1000-5000 times the baseline rate) of severe adverse reactions — including hospitalization, disability, and death — in the short term, i.e., within a few days or weeks of injection.
70% have only one short-term adverse event reported.
80% have only one or two short-term adverse events reported.
The toxic batches are distributed among all 50 US states.
You can look up VAERS data on batch toxicity at http://howbad.info, at least unless and until they change the batch numbering system to conceal toxic batches.
Ex-Pfizer VP and Chief Scientific Officer Michael Yeadon, PhD:

Dose range finding for lethal outcomes

There are 4-5 different sets of lots … in the US showing this DRF [dose range finding] effect.

Worse, there is a quiet period between each of the lethal batches, the purpose of which is clearly baseline establishment.


Source: https://t.me/robinmg/12207

The final, chilling observation is all three companies are doing similar, sinister studies.

They’re operating so as to not run over each other. When company A is deploying lethal batches, companies B & C are deploying only harmless batches.

Source: https://rense.com/general96/toxic-01.pdf

If Paardekooper is correct, the implications are profound: we could be facing mass murder through coercion of Americans to play Russian roulette by vaccination.

This warrants investigation by Congress, the Department of Justice, and state attorneys general.

Paardekooper‘s VAERS analysis should be replicated or refuted by others, including government investigators, as soon as possible.

Here is the video presentation by Craig Paardekooper recommended by Dr. Yeadon:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/keoCmPh3vuiG/


Pardekooper: Patterns of Deployment of Toxic Covid Vaccine Batches::

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6xIYPZBkydsu/


Paardekooper on batch codes and toxicity:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/3RtUTid1XCqi/


Quote:

There is a striking change in batch numbers for the Moderna deployment once toxicity exceeds 1780 x. The batch number changes to ending with 20A. Below this range, almost all the batches in the toxicity range of 100-1780 x have batch numbers ending with 21A.

How to download VAERS data to Excel for analyzing batch toxicity and verifying Paardekooper’s findings:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/EPQPrWBQzi6d/


Paardekooper:

It appears adverse effects are not random, but are rather the product of dosage testing within various toxic ranges, each denoted by a particular alphanumeric sequential code.

Source: https://t.me/CovidScienceLibrary/371

Moderna used the alphabet to label vaccines of varying toxicity, claims Paardekooper:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/vImdZ7WsV9iW/


Paardekooper video (12/7/21) claims VAERS data show deaths vary by batch.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/OG1NLvZQ4JFu/


He says deaths decrease “in a linear fashion as the alphabetic [batch] designation ascends. Batches can cause 1x [to] 7x the number of deaths, depending on their alphabetic designation.”

Quote:

In this video I show how number of deaths per batch also decreases as the alphabetic designation ascends.

This video demonstrates that -

1. There are different ranges of toxicity for different batches.
2. These ranges of toxicity are distinct from each other.
3. These ranges of toxicity are each labelled with a different letter of the alphabet
4. Toxicity decreases in a linear fashion as the alphabetic designation ascends

As a result, batches can cause 1x, 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, 6x, or 7x the number of deaths, depending on their alphabetic designation.

Moderna has labelled their vaccine batches in accordance with their toxicity [including deaths].


Source: https://t.me/CovidScienceLibrary/377

Paardekooper video (12/10/21) claims VAERS data show disabilities vary by batch.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/C4UJNsiH82sR/


Quote:

The difference in adverse reactions between batches ranges from 5000 to 100, so we have a 50x difference. There is also a 50x difference in rates of death, disability, and life-threatening illness when we compare the least harmful batches to the most harmful. It is hard to attribute such a large difference to throttling.

On the face of it , it appears that the batches vary greatly in toxicity.

And the discovery that each intermediate level of toxicity is represented by a different letter of the alphabet, only raises more suspicions.

Dr. Jessica Rose points out the batch numbering sequence corresponds to date of vaccine manufacture, not of injection into people. This is an important observation that could nullify Dr. Yeadon’s assumption that “there is a quiet [time] period between each of the lethal batches.”

Nevertheless, this does not invalidate Paardekooper’s findings on batch numbering by degree of vaccine toxicity.


James Hill MD’s Newsletter
Rose article does not negate Paardekooper’s finding of systematic vaccine batch toxicity
Dr. Jessica Rose’s December 2021 article Is someone staggering the more 'toxic' Vax Lots? makes the important point about Craig Paardekooper’s findings on toxic Covid vaccine lots (batches) that batch production dates don’t necessarily correspond to administration (injection) dates…
Read more
a month ago · 4 likes · James Hill, MD
An international team of independent researchers claims to have confirmed widely varying toxicity among US vaccine lots.

Twitter avatar for @jhillmd
James Hill, MD
@jhillmd
Toxicity varies by batch.

Independent researchers:

“Covid vaccines have huge variation, with many lots [distributed to 38 or more US states] producing 5 or fewer severe adverse reactions, but many others producing 1000-5000 severe adverse reactions.”
bitchute.com/video/4HlIyBmO…
Image
December 18th 2021

7 Retweets12 Likes
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4HlIyBmOEJeY/


Paardekooper Telegram post (12/18/21):

The batches causing most problems in children are the Pfizer batches in the EW series, shown in green above. The EW series has a toxicity of 1200 to 2500. Historical records show a large number of EW batches having this toxicity. Yet the regulators failed to investigate.

They are destroying these childrens lives. Injecting these toxins into children will cause them suffering that they cannot escape from. Internal injuries and damage will leave them crying almost continually in constant pain...trapped in a hell body.

We need to take direct action against those administering this evil.


Source: https://t.me/CovidScienceLibrary/418

Paardekooper says VAERS data indicate the Moderna L hot batch series, deployed in January 2021 primarily to prioritized older people, had 2,700 adverse event reports, including 33 deaths and 27 disabilities.


Source: https://t.me/CovidScienceLibrary/409

Quote:

100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data
An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.

But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.

The data used in the investigation was pulled from the publicly accessible VAERS database which can be viewed here. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a United States programme for vaccine safety, co-managed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The programme collects information via reports made by doctors, nurses, and patients about adverse events (possible harmful side effects) that occur after administration of vaccines to ascertain whether the risk–benefit ratio is high enough to justify continued use of any particular vaccine.

The reports pulled from the database were ones that had been submitted up to October 15th 2021 and they included all adverse reactions reported against the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injections, as well as all adverse reactions reported against the influenza vaccines; which were used to generate a control dataset .


The VAERS database showed a total of 1,608 adverse event reports against the flu vaccines alongside 15 deaths and 73 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 494.

The ‘lot number’ is a specific string of numbers and letters that tracks a specific batch of vaccine from production and into a persons arm and it is usually found on a vaccine label or accompanying packaging.


The above chart shows the number of adverse event report made to VAERS against the influenza vaccines sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event.

Except for a few spikes the number of adverse events per lot number was generally the same, with no more than 26 reports being made against a single lot number of influenza vaccine.


The above charts shows the count of lots by number of reports of adverse reactions per lot for the influenza vaccines. It shows that 33% of the lots (165 / 494) only had a single adverse reaction report made against them, whilst just 0.6% of the lots (3 / 494) had at least 20 adverse reaction reports made against them.


The above chart shows how many times a specific lot number was identified in an adverse reaction report of which the person had died following vaccination against the Flu. Ninety-seven-percent of the lots (480 / 494) were associated with zero deaths, whilst 13 lots were associated with a single death and 1 lot was associated with 2 deaths.


The above chart shows the number of states within the USA a specific log number of the influenza vaccine was distributed to.

The VAERS data shows that 44% of the lots (219 / 494) were sent to just a single state within the USA, whilst a further 17% (86 / 494) were sent to 2 states, 10% (50 / 494) were sent to 3 states, 5% (24 / 494) were sent to 4 states, 3% (17 / 494) were sent to 5 states, 2% (11 / 494) were sent to 6 states, and just 0.4 (2 / 494) were sent to 12 states within the USA.

All of the above data was then used as a control dataset to compare against VAERS data for the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.


The VAERS database showed a total of 171,463 adverse event reports against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,828 deaths and 14,262 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 4,522.

This data alone shows that there have been 106 times as many adverse reactions, 189 times as many deaths, and 195 times as many hospitalisations due to the Pfizer Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.


The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event. We do not have reliable information about standard lot size, but news articles indicate an average lot size of 1000 vials (approx. 6000 doses).

The highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the influenza vaccine was 26. Which makes it all the more shocking to discover that the highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine up to October 15th 2021 was 3,563, and this isn’t an anomaly.

Thousands of adverse event reports have been made against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine numerous times, and unfortunately the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine hasn’t fared any better.


The VAERS database showed a total of 188,998 adverse event reports against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,603 deaths and 10,225 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 5,510.

This data alone shows that there have been 118 times as many adverse reactions, 174 times as many deaths, and 140 times as many hospitalisations due to the Moderna Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.


The above chart shows the number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine sorted by the lot number of vaccine that was administered prior to the adverse event, and it shows that the Moderna jab fared even worse than the Pfizer jab in this department with the highest number of adverse event reports against a single lot number of Moderna Covid-19 vaccine totalling a staggering 4,967.


The above chart shows the count of lots against the range of adverse events reported per lot of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. The data reveals that 2,908 lots (64%) had just a single adverse event report made against them, whilst 2 specific lots had over 3000 adverse event reports made against them.

Shockingly we can also see from the data that 30 lots of Pfizer vaccine had between 1,000 and 1,499 adverse event reports per lot, another 20 lots had between 1,500 and 1,999 adverse event reports per lot, and another 23 lots had between 2,000 and 2,499 adverse event reports per lot.

This suggests that there were a small quantity of dangerous batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine and a large quantity of seemingly harmless (at least in the short term) batches of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.


But the investigation of VAERS data also revealed that reported deaths due to the Pfizer vaccine were again only associated with certain batches of the jab. The chart above shows that 96% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,828 reported deaths were associated with just 4% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine.

Five lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each, a further 5 lot numbers were associated with 81-100 deaths each, and just 2 separate lot numbers were associated with over 100 deaths each.


The same can be seen for the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine. Ninety-five-percent of the lots of Moderna vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,603 deaths were associated with just 5% of the lots of Moderna vaccine.

Thirteen lot numbers were associated with 41-60 deaths each, 2 lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each and 1 lot number was associated with 81-100 deaths.

The investigation of VAERS data also found that specific batches of the pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines which were distributed to between 13 and 50 states across the USA had an unusually high number of adverse event reports and deaths compared to lots that were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA


As you can see from the above table 4,289 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA, recording 9,141 adverse event reports against them alongside 99 deaths and 657 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 2 adverse event reports per lot and 0 deaths and hospitalisations.

However, a further 130 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to between 13-50 states across the USA, recording 166,170 adverse event reports, 2,799 deaths, and 14,155 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 1,278 adverse event reports per lot number, alongside 22 deaths and 109 hospitalisations.

This data therefore shows that each lot from the 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people.


The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘EK9231’; causing over 3,500 adverse event reports.


The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘EN6201’ causing almost 120 deaths.


The above chart on the left shows the number of adverse event reports against the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13 or more states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘039K20A’; causing over 4,000 adverse event reports.

The second most harmful batch of Moderna vaccine was assigned lot number ‘041L20A’, and media reports show that it was actually recalled by the Orange County Healthcare Agency in January 2021 following reports of allergic reactions.


Source

The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Moderna vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘039K20A’ causing almost 100 deaths.

Conclusion
This investigation of VAERS data reveals several concerning findings which warrant further investigation, but it also leads to questions of why authorities within the USA which are supposed to monitor the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines have not discovered this themselves.

The data clearly shows that the Covid-19 vaccination campaign has been significantly more harmful and deadly than the influenza vaccination campaign. This fact alone begs the question as to how the FDA advisory committee could possibly vote Seventeen to Zero in favour of approving the Pfizer vaccine for use in children aged 5 to 11.

One voting member of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee admitted that it will not be fully known whether Pfizer’s vaccine is safe for 5 to 11-year-old children, until it begins being administered.

Dr Eric Rubin of Harvard University said – “We’re never going to learn how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes”.

But the investigation of VAERS has also identified the specific batches of Pfizer and Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm across the USA, which leads to other extremely serious questions requiring urgent answers.

Why is it that certain batches of the vaccine have proven to be more harmful than others?

Why is it that certain batches of Covid-19 vaccine have proven to be deadlier than others?

Why is it that the most harmful and deadly Covid-19 vaccines were distributed across the entire USA, whilst the least harmful and deadly were only ever distributed to a few states? Was this done on purpose?

Could this just be a quality control issue?

A Pfizer whistleblower from a Kansas manufacturing facility did after all reveal that “People are being made to sign off on things that normally they wouldn’t, and then they wonder why their own employees won’t take it”

https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/31/100-perc...-produced/

Quote:

COVER-UP: Report Links Ballooning Fatalities to “Specific Batches” of the Covid-19 Vaccine – By Mike Whitney

"“Dr. Fauci is likely responsible for a preponderance of the total 802,000 US Covid deaths…. It was Dr. Fauci who organized the suppression of easily marshaled and inexpensive early treatments… Fauci who promoted the protocol of sending sick patients home from the ER without any treatment … Fauci who is responsible for the emergency use authorization on the mRNA “vaccines” that may have killed hundreds of thousands more Americans… And .. Fauci who wants to vaxx up all the children in America, despite evidence that the mRNA shots permanently disable children’s innate natural immune systems and can cause lasting heart, blood vessel, brain, and reproductive damage…” James Howard Kunstler, “Where Do You Stand?”"

Question– Can the deaths that are reported on VAERS be linked to specific batches of the Covid-19 vaccine?

Answer– Yes, they can.

Question– Are you sure of that? What you’re suggesting is that particular lots of the vaccine are toxic.

Answer– That appears to be the case.

Question– I want to make sure I understand what you’re saying: Are you accusing the drug companies of murder?

Answer– That possibility can’t be ruled out, although it cannot yet be proven “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Not surprisingly, however, neither industry leaders, regulators or the FBI have shown the slightest interest in examining the evidence that has been meticulously compiled by reputable researchers. The fact is, there is already sufficient statistical evidence that something very sinister is going on that requires an immediate and thorough investigation. It’s a matter of gravest concern, after all, people are dying.

Question– I’m still can’t believe what you’re saying. Do you really think that corporations kill for money?

Answer– Have you ever heard of Vioxx, Paxil or Oxycodone or have you been living under a rock for the last 40 years? Are you at all familiar with the abysmal record of these serial felons that masquerade as respectable pharmaceutical companies but have inflicted horrible suffering and injury on the population? Yes, I realize that liberals love these drug companies and believe they operate with the purest of intentions, but I’m telling you that they’d cut your heart out in a split-second if they thought it would fatten their bottom line. I suggest you expand your reading and figure it out for yourself.

Question– Let’s cut to the chase: What proof do you have that the drug companies are deliberately distributing these “toxic” batches of vaccines?

Answer– Wait a minute: What I’m saying is there’s enough evidence to warrant an investigation. I’m also saying that if industry shills, like Fauci, were really on the up-an-up, they’d temporarily halt the vaccination campaign until this business is sorted out. Now check out this blurb from The Expose’:

“An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.

But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations.” (“EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data”, The Expose)



“The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number ‘EN6201’ causing almost 120 deaths.” (The Expose’)

Answer– Think about that for a minute. The “deadly” vaccines were widely distributed across the US but they’re all identifiable by a simple lot number. That’s astonishing, don’t you think? So, we know that specific lot numbers are killing and injuring people but Fauci and Co. still haven’t alerted the public, notified the FBI, called for an investigation or stopped the vaccination campaign. Why? And why is the media ignoring this story? If they were genuinely interested in saving lives, this would be headline news, wouldn’t it?

Question– But that’s all just speculation. You still have not produced a lick of evidence to back your claims.

Answer– You’re right. So far, it’s all just theory, so let’s get back to the article:

“Scientists compared variability between Flu vaccine lots with variability between Covid vaccine lots, and were shocked to find EXCESSIVE and HIGHLY UNUSUAL degree of variation between different lots of the Covid vaccines. When 22,000 flu vaccine lots were examined, almost all of them produced 5 or fewer severe adverse reactions per lot…

When the same number of Covid vaccines were compared, there was found to be huge variation – with many lots producing 5 or fewer severe adverse reactions , but many others producing 1000-5000 severe adverse reactions.” (The Expose’)

How does that happen? How does one batch generate almost zero adverse reactions and another batch generates 1,000-times that amount? Is it just a quality control issue or is there more here that meets the eye?

And this is not a trivial matter since it appears that these particular batches may be responsible for the bulk of the 20,000 fatalities listed on the VAERS reporting system. Also, as the author points out:

“Under FDA regulations, such high variation between different lots and between different manufacturers means the drugs are ADULTERATED, and carries significant legal penalties. Such variation may also negate EUA authorization – which is only granted based on consistency of the product.” (The Expose’)

Question– I agree that it’s all very concerning, but you still haven’t produced any hard evidence yet. Show me the proof of wrongdoing or admit that you’re jumping the gun.

Answer– Look; we’re building a case here without access to the labs where these vaccines were manufactured and without access to any forensic evidence whatsoever. The best we can do is provide circumstantial and statistical evidence that a thorough investigation is warranted. Got it? We don’t have a smoking gun. What we have is compelling evidence that something very sinister is going on. People are dying and their deaths are directly connected to specific vaccine lots that can be positively identified and traced back to their source. Isn’t that enough to justify an independent probe?

I think it is but, naturally, the people who have something to hide are not going to support an investigation.

Now, get a load of this video that gives an excellent rundown of what we’re dealing with. The whole thing is worth watching, but for our purposes, we’ll focus on minute 14: 35. Here’s what they say:

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/4HlIyBmOEJeY/ Video Link

“With 2,244 batches shown on the graph, 40% had only 1 adverse reaction, whereas the top 20% were causing over 1,000 adverse reactions per batch… Which shows that the top 20% is 1,000 times worse than the bottom 40%.” That’s exactly correct. Only a small percentage of lots are causing almost 100% of adverse events and deaths in our data sets.. There can be 1,000% difference in the experience of someone who gets a shot from one lot, than from someone who gets a shot from another.” It’s a very disturbing situation, no product should be varying like this when it is being given to masses of otherwise healthy people, (including) pregnant women and children. We are exposing them to a gigantic amount of risk. …

…People who think (these vaccines ) are safe and effective like all the traditional vaccines you are familiar with, you should think again, because this variability exposes a large number of people to excessive risk.

…Sometime manufacturers are exempt from good manufacturing practices if the FDA deems it is a public health emergency, but in that case, the public should be aware of what they are taking. They should not be equating these injections to traditional vaccines.” (“Covid 19 Vaccines by Lot Number”, Bitchute)

Answer– Allow me to state the obvious: “1,000% difference” is more than a rounding error. It suggests that certain lots are contaminated even though they are still being used. That is flat-out scary.

Also, while this analysis does not prove a criminal conspiracy, it certainly strengthens the case for those who– like myself– believe that that’s exactly what’s going on, a conspiracy. Naturally, any depopulation scheme would have to appear randomized and sporadic. Such a scheme would not play out in a year or even two years, but over the course of a decade or more. Vaccines would play a critical role in that scheme as they provide direct access to the physical biology of all 7 billion people on earth. A small portion of those people would die shortly after inoculation, which is what we are seeing here. The vast majority of fatalities, however, would only show up in the excess mortality data which has been steadily rising in all the countries that launched mass vaccination campaigns earlier in the year. The trajectory of these excess deaths suggest that the depopulation agenda will only be achieved over a protracted period of time, perhaps, a decade or more. What that shows, is that –while our rulers may be evil– they’re not stupid, in fact, they are disturbingly calculating. Here’s how analyst Steve Kirsch summed it up on his Substack account:

“It is exceptionally clear that criminal activity within the vaccine community has caused an adulteration of 1% of the vaccine batches, which is why overall we get such poor results…. This is exceptionally clear when you see that about 99% of the vaccine batches produce typically 0-3 adverse events in the VAERS database, whilst the other 1% produce typically hundreds to many-thousands of AE (Adverse Events), including almost all of the deaths and serious disabilities, which aren’t present in the other 99%.”

Repeat: “Criminal activity… has caused an adulteration of 1% of the vaccine batches.”

As former Pfizer VP Mike Yeadon points out in another post, there are only two options we need to consider regarding this matter. Either:

1. No one noticed. (Not the manufacturers, nor FDA, nor CDC, HHS, insurers etc.)

2. (Or) They know. (what’s going on, that is.)

Which is it?

Yeadon concludes that it would be impossible for the people in charge NOT to know. So, yes, they DO know; they know there are “adulterated” batches that are killing and injuring people, just as they know they’re not going to do anything that would rock the boat and change the ultimate outcome. So, the fatalities will continue to mount; that’s what we’re left with. Here’s more from Yeadon:

“Given VAERS is publicly accessible & is specified as a tool for detecting the unexpected, there must be someone in a three-letter agency tasked with monitoring VAERS…. The he adds this, “I don’t care what your general view is of vaccines broadly or covid19 vaccines specifically, you cannot accept this huge degree of output vaccination from lot to lot. It’s injected Russian roulette.”

Not surprisingly, that’s the term that keeps popping up everywhere: “Russian roulette”; spin the chamber and hope you don’t blow your brains out. Is it too much to expect that vaccination should be more than a (potentially) life-ending roll-of-the-dice? Is that too much to ask?